Visual indicating device for bad breath

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8702618
  • Patent Number
    8,702,618
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 16, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 22, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
The invention provides a breath testing device which includes a visual indicating agent which changes color in the presence of an odor associated with bad breath, such as sulfur and ammonia odors. An example of the visual indicating agent is 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)-benzhydrol (Michler's hydrol or BDMB) and related dyes having a similar chemical structure. The indicating agent is applied to a substrate which is then inserted into a tube or straw, or which covers one end of a straw. When a user with bad breath blows into the tube or straw, the indicating agent will change color. The breath testing devices provide a quick and affordable means for a user to test their breath, and they may be packaged in discreet, pocket-sized dispensers which can be carried in a pocket or purse.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the literature, bad breath is usually referred to as halitosis or oral odor. The term halitosis comes from the Latin Halitus, meaning breath and the Greek -osis, meaning abnormal condition. On one hand most people are not aware of their own breath (whether sweet or bad), while on the other hand most people usually feel too uncomfortable to inform a person that they have bad breath.


The breath freshening and oral hygiene areas are large markets which are continuing to grow. For example, market research has shown that consumers in the USA spent US$1.8 billion on toothpaste in 2000, around US$715 million on oral care gums, almost US$740 million on mouthwash and other dental rinses, and almost US$950 million on toothbrushes and dental floss. Although many of those products are primarily for the maintenance of oral health, consumers also buy them to ensure that their breath is pleasant. The US$625 million spent on breath fresheners other than gums and mouthwash, for example breath mints, is directly for this purpose.


The mouth and nasal passages are home to hundreds of bacterial species with various nutritional preferences. In otherwise healthy people, the very back of the tongue, rather than the teeth and gums, is the main source of bad breath. This region is poorly cleansed by saliva and contains numerous tiny invaginations in which bacteria can hide. These bacteria putrefy postnasal drip and other oral debris that can collect there. These tiny organisms thrive on proteins, and the chemical compounds that result from the digestion of these proteins include some fetid compounds. At any given time, oral bacteria may be producing hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg smell), methyl mercaptan and skatole (also present in feces); indole; cadaverine (associated with rotting corpses); putrescine (found in decaying meat); and isovaleric acid (the smell of sweaty feet).


Additional oral sources of bad breath include poor oral hygiene (especially if proteinaceous particles are left between teeth), gum inflammation, faulty dental work, unclean dentures and abscesses. Because a steady flow of saliva washes away bacteria and its resultant odorous chemical products, anything that promotes dryness (for example, breathing through one's mouth, fasting, prolonged talking, stress and many medications) can exacerbate the situation.


Some bad breath seems to be associated with actual periodontal disease and is therefore a useful clue to physicians and dentists. The presence of several key bacteria such as Treponema Denticola, Porphyromonas Gingivalis and Bactericides Forsythesis can be founding plaque or the tongue.


The chemical composition and concentrations of the odorous compounds associated with bad breath have been studied and reported in the literature (Krotoszynski et al, 1977; Tonzetich, 1971). The most common odorous compound in levels above the human detection threshold is hydrogen sulfide (>250 ppb), followed by other sulfur containing compounds such as methyl mercaptan and dimethylsulfide. The human nose can detect hydrogen sulfide levels as low as 0.02 ppm (v/v), and levels of 0.025 ppm and greater are deemed to be characteristic of bad breath in a person.


While there are numerous products and technologies that cure or treat bad breath, there are surprisingly few devices available on the market to help identify and alert a user to bad breath.


One clinical instrument which is currently used to measure ppm levels in patients' breath is the Halimeter™ breath tester (available from Interscan Corporation, Chatsworth, Calif.), which costs US$1200 and is not portable. Another device is the BreathAlert™ breath tester (available from Tanita Corporation, Arlington Heights, Ill.). This is a small hand-held unit which costs about US$25. It uses a heated wire to detect sulfide compounds in a person's breath and gives a read-out in four levels.


The Halimeter™ breath tester has high sensitivity for hydrogen sulfide but low sensitivity for methyl mercaptan, which is a significant contributor to halitosis caused by periodontal disease. The BreathAlert T™ breath tester unit was sensitive to sulfide concentration, but gave different numbers depending on the position of the meter from the mouth and how the user breathed or blew into the unit's intake area.


There are also other devices which use oral bacteria measurements to indicate bad breath (for example, a device available from Soft Lines International), but these are very expensive and take time to provide an indication of bad breath, and are therefore not particularly useful to a user who wants to conduct a “spot check” on their breath.


It would be very useful if users were able to check their breath before meetings or dates, while at the office or after a meal.


There is therefore a clear need for an affordable, portable and rapid indicator for testing for bad breath.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

As used herein the terms “odorous compound” and “odor” refer to any molecule or compound detectable to the olfactory system. The term “bad breath” refers to unpleasant odors which are present in a person's breath in levels which are detectable by another person. The term “visual indicating agent” refers to a substance, a composition or a material that gives a visual indication when a bad breath odor is present in a person's breath in a sufficient concentration.


Visual indicating agents that are sensitive to very low levels (>10 parts per billion (ppb)) of sulfur and/or amine containing odors were identified. On exposure to low levels of these odors the color indicating agents change color, thereby indicating the presence of bad breath to the user.


Suitable visual indicating agents are 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)-benzhydrol (BDMD or Michler's hydrol (MH)) and related dyes having the general formula (I) or (II).




embedded image



Michler's hydrol was identified and demonstrated to be sensitive to very low levels (˜20 ppb) of sulfur and/or amine volatile compounds, the major odorous components of bad breath. This dye was tested for its sensitivity to the various odors in bad breath (sulfurs and amines in particular, including bad breath caused by fish, garlic, onions and the like), and was determined to be a good visual indicating agent for bad breath detection.


Simple breath testing devices which contain at least one of the indicating agents were also developed, wherein the indicating agent changes color when a user has bad breath. The visual indicating agent is color sensitive to at least one odor present in bad breath.


The device includes a simple carrier portion defining a passage, such as a substantially transparent tube or straw, containing the visual indicating agent and which is open on at feast one end. While the invention will be described hereinafter with particular reference to straws and tubes, it will be understood that the invention is useful with various other shapes as well. For example, the shape of the passageway may be cylindrical, triangular, square, almond-shaped and so forth.


The visual indicating agent may be in the form of a powder, in solution, or may be coated onto a substrate, such as cellulose tissue or paper, a non-woven polypropylene/polyethylene substrate, a woven substrate, glass fibre, cotton, silk, rayon and so forth. The straw may be substantially flattened to allow for easier storage, while still permitting a patient to blow through the passage in the tube. The device may include a zone with at least one reference color to allow the user to compare the color of the indicating agent after exposure to his or her breath with the reference color, and so easily determine if there has been a color change.


In one embodiment, the device includes a conveniently sized and discreet plastic tube, such as a clear drinking straw containing the color indicating agent. The color indicating agent can be applied to a strip which is inserted into the straw or over an end of the straw, can be used in powder form or can be incorporated into a solution inside the straw.


In order to test his or her breath, the user breathes or blows into or onto the device, and a change in color of the indicating agent (which may be the fading of color, the development of color or a change from one color to another) indicates that the user has bad breath. This breath testing device therefore alerts the user of his or her bad breath and allows them to take appropriate action, such as to brush his or her teeth, use mouthwash or eat a breathmint.


A dispenser for containing and dispensing the breath testing devices was also developed, and in one embodiment, the dispenser with the breath testing devices is designed so that it can be sold together with, or later attached to a dispenser for at least one breath freshening agent, such as toothpaste, breath mints or the like.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a standard curve for the detection of furfuryl mercaptan by Michler's Hydrol-dye;



FIG. 2 shows a standard curve for the detection of ammonia by MH-dye;



FIG. 3 shows simple breath testing devices according to one embodiment of the invention in an unassembled state, and a color change of the indicating agent in response to bad breath (right);



FIG. 4 shows the simple breath testing devices of Example 8, where the control tubes (a) and (e) have not been exposed to odor and tubes (b) to (d) have been exposed to breath odor (Tube (b): exposed to breath odor at BreathAlert™ detector reading of 2; Tubes (c) and (d): exposed to breath odor at BreathAlert™ detector reading of 3);



FIG. 5 shows a second embodiment of a breath testing device according to the invention with a color reference before (right) and after (left) exposure to bad breath odors;



FIG. 6 shows a third embodiment of the breath testing device according to the invention;



FIG. 7 shows a fourth embodiment of the breath testing device according to the invention;



FIG. 8 shows a dispenser for the breath testing devices (right) which is attachable to a dispenser for breath mints (left); and



FIG. 9 shows the dispensers of FIG. 8 when attached to each other.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides simple visual breath testing devices which are able to detect levels of sulfur and/or ammonia compounds in a user's breath which are indicative of bad breath. Thus, the breath testing devices include a visual indicating agent that changes color in the presence of bad breath. The breath testing device is portable, discreet, disposable and relatively inexpensive to produce.


In one embodiment, the visual indicating agent is 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)-benzhydrol, also known as “BDMD”, “Michler's hydrol” or “MH”. This indicating agent is sensitive to both sulfur-containing and ammonia-containing odors, changing from blue to colorless in the presence of these odors. Michler's Hydrol reacts with amine or sulfur compounds according to the following reaction:




embedded image


In alternative embodiments, the visual indicating agent may be an indicating agent represented by the following general formula (I) or (II):




embedded image



where,
















Indicating



Indicating


Agent
R
R′
R″
Agent for







Michler's Hydrol
(CH3)2NC6H4
(CH3)2NC6H4
H
Thiols, Mercaptans,


(MH)



Ammonia, Amines,






Diamines and Polyamines


Pararosaniline
(NH2)C6H4
(NH2)C6H4
(NH2)C6H4
Ammonia, Amines,


(PAB)



Diamines and Polyamines





Alpha- naphtholbenzein (ANB)
C6H4


embedded image




embedded image


Ammonia, Amines, Diamines and Polyamines





Naphthochrome Green (NCG)
C6H4


embedded image




embedded image


Ammonia, Amines, Diamines and Polyamines









The dye may change color by fading to a lighter color, by deepening in color or by actually changing from one color to another.


The degree of the color change will depend on the concentration of the indicating agent or the concentration of sulfur or ammonia compounds in the patient's breath. Therefore, in order to observe a color change in response to sulfur and/or ammonia levels >10 parts per billion (ppb), more preferably >20 ppb, and most preferably >25 ppb, the concentration of indicating agent which is used is preferably in the range of from 0.001 to 15% wt/wt, more preferably from 0.005 to 2% wt/wt, and most preferably from 0.1 to 0.5% wt/wt.


The substrate, typically a cellulose tissue, may be coated with nanoparticles to provide a high surface area coating on the substrate, i.e., higher than the cellulose fiber by itself. Thus, the cellulose tissue may be given a boost in surface area by coating it with the nanoparticles. The treated substrate may be then coated with the visual indicating dye. It's believed that this high surface area coating spreads the dye over the silica surface to provide a thinner coating and thus improving the sensitivity of the device.


The average size of the nanoparticles is generally less than about 100 nanometers, in fact it may be from about 1 to about 50 nanometers, and from about 4 to about 20 nanometers. As used herein, the average size of a particle refers to its average length, width, height, and/or diameter.


The nanoparticles may have a surface area of from about 50 square meters per gram (m2/g) to about 1000 m2/g, in some cases from about 100 m2/g to about 600 m2/g, and in some cases, from about 180 m2/g to about 240 m2/g.


In addition, the nanoparticles may also be relatively nonporous or solid. That is, the nanoparticles may have a pore volume that is less than about 0.5 milliliters per gram (ml/g), less than about 0.4 milliliters per gram, less than about 0.3 ml/g, and even from about 0.2 ml/g to about 0.3 ml/g. It is believed that the solid nature, i.e., low pore volume, of the nanoparticles may enhance the uniformity and stability of the nanoparticles.


Examples of commercially available alumina nanoparticles include, for instance, Aluminasol® 100, Aluminasol® 200 and Aluminasol® 520, which are available from Nissan Chemical America Corporation, Houston, Tex., USA. Alternatively, silica nanoparticles may be utilized, such as Snowtex-C®, Snowtex-O®, Snowtex-PS® and Snowtex-OXS® nanoparticles, which are also available from Nissan Chemical.


Snowtex-OXS® nanoparticles, for instance, have a particle size of from 4 to 6 nanometers, and may be ground into a powder having a surface area of approximately 509 square meters per gram. Also, alumina-coated silica particles may be used, such as Snowtex-AK® nanoparticles available from Nissan Chemical.


The breath testing device includes a simple supporting member, such as a substantially transparent tube or straw containing the visual indicating agent. The straw or tube may be substantially flattened to allow for easier storage, while still permitting a patient to blow through the passage in the tube.


The visual indicating agent may be in the form of a powder, in solution, or may be applied in solution onto a substrate, such as cellulose tissue or paper, cotton, a non-woven polypropylene/polyethylene substrate, a woven substrate, glass fiber, silk, rayon, fabric, fiber, spunbond, synthetic polymer and so forth, and dried, leaving a dried residue. The indicating agent may also be printed in solution onto the substrate, for example by using an inkjet printer. The term “in solution” as used herein refers to a liquid solution of the indication agent in water, an aqueous solution or solvent such as alcohol or toluene.


The breath testing device may include a zone with at least one reference color or shade of color to allow the user to compare the color of the indicating agent after exposure to his or her breath with the reference color, and so easily determine if there has been a color change.


In one embodiment, the visual indicating agent is coated onto a cellulose substrate which is then inserted into a straw. In another embodiment, the visual indicating agent is again coated onto a cellulose substrate, but is placed over one end of a straw.


In both embodiments, when a user blows into the tube, their breath will pass through the tube and over or through the substrate, thus causing the indicating agent to change color if levels of sulfur and/or ammonia compounds which are indicative of bad breath (generally >=25 ppb) are present in the user's breath.


According to another embodiment, the breath testing devices described above were made smaller in size so that several of the breath testing devices could be easily packaged together in a pocket-sized container. A straw was cut to about 4 cm in length, and a dye-treated substrate was either inserted into the straw or was placed over one end of the straw. The straw was then substantially flattened by laminating it in a standard business card heated laminator so that air was still able to pass through the tube of the straw.


A dispenser for containing and dispensing the breath testing devices was also developed, and in one embodiment, a pocket-sized dispenser for containing and dispensing several breath testing devices was designed so that it can be sold together with, or later attached to, a dispenser for a breath freshening agent, such as toothpaste, breath mints or the like.


Unless otherwise specified, chemicals and biochemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich of Milwaukee, Wis. Absorbance readings were measured using a microplate reader from Dynex Technologies of Chantilly, Va. (Model 4 MRX).


The most widely used color test is called CIELAB and is discussed in Pocket Guide to Digital Printing by F. Cost, Delmar Publishers, Albany, N.Y. ISBN 0-8273-7592-1 at pages 144 and 145. This method defines three variables, L*, a*, and b*, that correspond to three characteristics of perceived color based on the opponent theory of color perception. The three variables have the following meaning:


L*=Lightness, ranging from 0 to 100. Where 0=dark and 100=light,


a*=Red/green axis, ranging approximately from −100 to 100. Positive values are reddish and negative values are greenish.


b*=Yellow/blue axis, Ranging approximately from −100 to 100. Positive values are yellowish and negative values are blueish.


Because CIELAB color space is somewhat uniform, a single number can be calculated that represents the difference between two colors as perceived by a human being. This difference is termed ΔE and is calculated by taking the square root of the sum of the squares of the three differences (ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*) between the two colors. In CIELAB color space, each ΔE unit is roughly a just-noticeable difference between two colors. So that the two colors have a difference of, for example, 4.4, the human eye can perceive the difference in color between the two colors. CIELAB is therefore a good measure for an objective device-independent color specification system that can be used as a reference color space for the purpose of color management and expression of changes in color.


Color intensities (L*a*b* values) herein were measured using a handheld spectrophotometer from Minolta Co. Ltd. of Osaka, Japan (Model #CM2600d). This instrument utilizes the D/8 geometry conforming to CIE No. 15, ISO 772411, ASTM E1164 and JIS Z8722-1982 (diffused illumination) 8 degree viewing system, The D65 light reflected by the specimen surface at an angle of 8 degrees to the normal of the surface is received by the specimen-measuring optical system.


An acetate buffer containing 40 mM sodium acetate and 4 M guanidine HCl, pH 5.1, was used for preparations of the indicating agents.


Paper towels or KIMWIPES® tissues from Kimberly-Clark Corporation of Dallas, Tex., USA were coated with Snowtex-O® nanoparticles (pH 4.1), available from Nissan Chemical, and were used in the examples described herein with Milchler's hydrol dye (MH or BDMB) where dye was added without acetate buffer, unless otherwise indicated.


The invention will now be described in more detail by way of the following non-limiting examples.


Example 1

1 ml of a reaction mixture was placed into each of 6 vials containing 10 μl of furfuryl mercaptan (0, 0.228, 0.456, 0.912, 1.824 and 3.648 ppm, respectively), 980 μl of buffer containing 40 mM sodium acetate and 4 M guanidine chloride, pH 5.1 and 10 μl of 0.65 mg/ml MH dye (BDMB). After incubation of all the vials at room temperature for less than 5 minutes, a 200 μl portion from each vial was transferred to a microtiter plate well, and the absorbances at 590 nm were measured using a microtiter plate reader. The absorbances can also be measured in the range of 580-615 nm.


As shown in FIG. 1, a standard curve was derived using furfuryl mercaptan as a model thiol odorous compound detectable by MH dye. In FIG. 1 the x-axis is the concentration of furfuryl mercaptan in ppm from 0 to 4 and the y-axis is the inverse of the absorbance at 590 nm. The sensitivity of thiol detection was found to be very high in this method.


Example 2

As garlic is a common cause of bad breath, Michler's Hydrol (MH) was tested to see if it is a sensitive indicating agent for garlic odors. Garlic vapor has a sulfur compound (diallyl thiosulfinate (allicin)) as its major odorous component. Fresh-cut garlic was placed in a jar with a MH-dyed Scott® paper towel, and the jar was sealed. The paper towel in the garlic containing jar was observed to change color (from blue to colorless) within 3-5 minutes, whereas no color change was observed in a control jar.


Example 3

The experiment was repeated, but instead of using MH dye only, the MH dye was mixed with dyes which are not color sensitive to the odors present in bad breath, such as food dyes, in order to create alternative indicating colors. Exposure of the mixed dye to bad breath odors caused the MH-dye to become colorless, thus resulting in the area coated with the mixed dye to change from the mixed color to the food dye color (Table 1).









TABLE 1







Combinations Of MH-dye and non-odor sensitive dyes












Color Before
Color After



Dye
Odor
Odor Exposure






Food Red No. 40
Red
Red



Food Red 40/
Purple
Red



Michler's Hydrol





Food Yellow No. 5
Yellow
Yellow



Food Yellow No.5/
Green
Yellow



Michler's Hydrol









Example 4

As an alternative to coating a solution of the indicating agent onto a cellulose substrate as described in examples 1 to 3 above, a solution of the indicating agent was formulated into an inkjet printable ink. Inkjet printing deposits a thin coating of dye on top of the substrate, potentially allowing a more sensitive color coating on the substrate. The Michler's Hydrol dye solution was formulated with inkjet additives shown in Table 2 below.









TABLE 2







Inkjet formulation










INK COMPONENT
VOLUME (ml)













Water (deionized)
0.85



Ethylene Glycol
3.0



Glycerol
1.5



Polyethylene Glycol (200 MW)
3.0



1,3-Propanediol
1.5



Michler's Hydrol (1.5 mg/ml)
40.1



in 40 mM sodium acetate




and 4M guanidine HCl, pH 5.1




TOTAL
50









The ink solution was loaded into empty Margarita™ cartridges (part no. 0900400-300) obtained from McDermid-Colorspan of Eden Prairie, Minn. and printed using a wide format McDermid-Colorspan printer (Model XII). Good inkjet printing on Scott® paper towel substrate was demonstrated. A strip of the printed Scott® paper towel was then exposed to garlic odor and the blue color was observed to decolorize in 10 seconds (compared to 3-5 minutes taken to observe the color change of a Scott® paper towel saturated with MH according to one of the previous examples). Higher sensitivity to the odor was thus observed by inkjet printing the indicating agent onto the substrate.


Example 5

As shown in FIG. 2, a standard curve was derived using ammonium hydroxide solution as an ammonia odor source in order to determine whether MH is a suitable indicating agent for ammonia.


Into each of 8 vials, 50 μl of a specific concentration of ammonia solution (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32, and 0.64%, respectively) was mixed with 150 μl of MH solution (20 μl of 10.0 mg/ml MH in CH3CN with 5.0 ml of 40 mM sodium acetate and 4 M guanidine HCl, pH 5.1) and the vials were sealed and incubated for less than 4 min.


The solutions were then transferred to microtiter plate wells and the absorbances were measured at 590 nm. The absorbance readings were plotted against the concentrations of ammonia solutions, with the concentrations being represented as parts per billion (ppb). In FIG. 2, the x-axis is the concentration of ammonia in parts per billion (ppb) from 0 to 400 and the y-axis is the absorbance at 590 nm from 1 to 0.7. The sensitivity of MH to ammonia was very high, and it was shown that the sensitivity could be altered by varying the MH-dye concentration.


Example 6

As shown in FIG. 3, breath testing devices 10 were made using a simple drinking straw into which a rolled dye-coated paper towel was inserted. The dye content on the paper towel varied depending on the sensitivity required for bad breath testing. Accordingly, 1 mg/ml stock solution of MH-dye 16 was applied on a Snowtex™-O nanoparticle-coated Scott® paper towel and allowed to air dry. The dye-coated paper towel was then cut into 2 cm×4 cm strips 12 which were rolled up and each strip 12 was inserted into a clear plastic drinking straw 14 from Glad Products Company of Oakland, Calif.


The breath testing devices 10 were tested by injecting known concentrations of ethyl mercaptan into the straws 14 to determine their sensitivity to sulphur odors. A color change 18 was noticed and was clearly visible in the presence of sulphur odors.


Several volunteers were also given a number of these straws and were asked to blow into them with one lung-full of breath. The tubes demonstrated bad breath sensitivity, typically with morning breath or after a spicy meal. Color change of the indicator articles was easily observable with an unaided eye, and the color intensities (La*b*) were measured using a handheld Minolta spectrophotometer from Minolta Co. Ltd, Osaka, Japan, Model #CM-2600d. An example of the data obtained from one sample is shown in Table 3 below.









TABLE 3







Color intensities of indicating article into which a person


with bad breath has blown (expt.) compared with a control


article which has not been exposed to bad breath













SAMPLE
L
a*
b*
Δ E
















Control
66.32
7.27
−38.98




Expt.
74.42
−9.51
−26.69
22.7









Example 7

The simple breath testing devices were tested in a laboratory by having volunteers test their breath using the breath testing devices described in Example 6, a clinical Halimeter™ breath tester and a BreathAlert™ breath tester.


Each volunteer first blew into the Halimeter™ and BreathAlert™ breath testers, and then blew through the visual breath indicating devices twice, each time with a full lung-full of breath.


The visual indicator devices containing the Michler's hydrol showed different degrees of decolorization of the blue dye. This could be read by the spectrophotometer and the color change measured by comparison of the before- and after-exposure samples was expressed as ΔE (the human eye can only distinguish between samples having differences in ΔE of 3 or greater).


The analytical readings taken from the Halimeter™ and BreathAlert™ breath testers were then compared to the color change of the straw. The results are shown in Table 4 below.









TABLE 4







Comparison of Halimeter ™, BreathAlert ™ and


visual indicator devices of example 6











Color Change of
BreathAlert ™
Halimeter ™



Indicator Tube
Handheld
Reading For


SAMPLE
(ΔE)
Meter Reading
Sulfur (ppb)













Control
0.0

10


Volunteer 1
3.0
1
37


Volunteer 2
15.0
2
58









It should be noted that BreathAlert™ breath tester readings of 1 and 2 are low bad breath levels, hence the low hydrogen sulfide concentration readings from the Halimeter™ breath tester.


Example 8

Following on from the study of Example 7, a larger, more detailed study was conducted.


As in the previous study described in Example 7, volunteers were requested to blow into a BreathAlert T™ breath tester and then into two breath testing devices 10 as described in Example 6. This study obtained higher levels of bad breath than the previous study, and the results are shown below in Table 5. The breath testing devices used in the study are shown in FIG. 4.









TABLE 5







Correlation of color intensities (La*b*) of the indicator tubes


with bad breath detector (BreathAlert ™) readings














Type of







Tube
indicator
BreathAlert ™



ΔE


#
tube
reading
L value
a* value
b* value
value
















a
Control

60.84
13.04
−46.93
32.1





63.01
9.83
−44.91
27.8


e
Control

63.51
8.57
−42.80
25.4





62.95
10.48
−45.54
28.6



Control

62.15
9.87
−43.75
27.5





62.09
9.99
−43.84
27.6


b
Sample
2
71.34
−0.17
−32.33
10.3





70.13
1.66
−34.44
13.2


c
Sample
3
71.92
−2.49
−30.81
7.5





72.72
−2.69
−28.65
6.54


d
Sample
3
71.06
−4.44
−30.71
6.18





70.51
−2.36
−33.58
9.53









The above color change readings, expressed as ΔE, show the sensitivity of the dye to the bad breath odor. The readings were calculated by comparing the sample to the white standard. Thus the larger the ΔE value, the more colored the sample. As the sample decolorizes on exposure to bad breath, the blue becomes paler in color and this is reflected in the smaller ΔE value, i.e. the color is moving closer to white. The human eye can distinguish between samples having differences in ΔE of 3 or greater. Thus, the eye can easily tell the difference between samples which had bad breath levels of 2 and 3 (as measured using the BreathAlert™ device), as well as the difference between the control and a sample having a bad breath of level 2.


As a result of this sensitivity, it is possible to produce a color scale which can inform the user of the intensity of his or her bad breath. For example, a panel on the side of a container containing the breath testing devices could include a color graduation scale, similar to the universal pH indicator. This scale would inform the user as to mild, moderate or intense bad breath readings.


The color-based technology was not found to give false negatives, unlike the electronic devices.


Example 9

KIMWIPES® tissues were coated with a 5% Snowtex-O® nanoparticle solution from Nissan Chemical and then air-dried. 5.0 mg/ml stock solution of MH-dye in acetonitrile was applied to the Snowtex-O® nanoparticle-coated KIMWIPES® tissues and a blue color was observed to develop as the applied dye solution dried.


As illustrated in FIG. 5, a drinking straw 20 from Glad Products Company of Oakland, Calif., was placed on a cardboard strip 22, and a piece of the dye-nanoparticle coated tissue 24 was placed over a first end 25 of the straw 20. Thus, when a person breathes into the second end 28 of the straw, their breath would pass through the tissue 24 at the first end of the straw. The straw was placed between two sheets of polyethylene 28 which were then heat-sealed so that only the second end 26 of the straw was exposed. A reference (or control) color strip 30 was also placed between the polyethylene sheets near, but separate from, the first end 24 of the straw and sealed when the polyethylene sheets were heat sealed. This reference strip was a piece of the dye-coated tissue and allows the user to compare the color of the strip over the first end of the straw with the reference strip to see if there has been a color change, and hence to determine whether he or she has bad breath (right). The reference strip could also include a scale of two or more shades of blue so that the user could compare the change of color of the tissue over the straw with the scale, and so determine the degree of his or her bad breath. For example, a slight change in the color could represent mild bad breath, a more pronounced fade to a lighter blue could represent medium bad breath, and a complete change from blue to colorless could represent very bad breath.


A simple study was carried out with 15 volunteers to test whether the bad breath testing device was suitable for indicating whether or not they had bad breath. The test was a simple “Yes” or “No”, where a color change would indicate that the volunteer had bad breath (“Yes”) and no color change would indicate that they did not have bad breath (“No”).


Each volunteer was given 3 breath testing devices and was asked to breathe two full lung volumes into the second end of the straw first thing in the morning when getting out of bed (the most common time for bad breath). The volunteers were then asked to mark on the tube whether they thought they had bad breath.


Of the 45 devices which were handed out, 32 were returned and the results of this first test are shown in Table 6 below.









TABLE 6







Results from a test to determine the existence of bad


breath using the breath testing article described above









Results









False Assumptionc)












Volunteer
# Tested
True
True
False
False


Code
Samples
Positivea)
Negativeb)
Positived)
Negativee)















A
3
2

1



B
3
3





C
3
2
1




D
2
1

1



E
3
1

2



F
2
2





G
3
2

1



H
2
2





I
3
1
1
1



J
3
2

1



K
2
1


1


L
3
3





Total
32
23
2
7
1





KEY:



a)True Positive = Color change occurred when the user had bad breath.




b)True Negative = No color change occurred when the user did not have bad breath.




c)False Assumption = False assumption of the user




d)False Positive = User did not believe they had bad breath when in fact they did.




e)False Negative = No color change occurred when user believed they had bad breath.







These results indicate that the bad breath visual indicator devices are very sensitive and accurately inform the user of the presence of bad breath. Of the 32 devices tested, 22 showed a clear visual color change when the user thought they had bad breath. Interestingly, 7 color changes were recorded when the user did not think they had bad breath, but in fact they had bad breath. This finding matches the literature percentage of people who cannot detect their own bad breath: 22% of people in this study were unaware that they had bad breath, and the literature reports 25%. Only one breath testing device did not show a change in color when the user believed that they had bad breath.


Example 10

While the breath testing devices described in the previous examples were shown to be suitable for indicating the existence of bad breath, they were still believed to be slightly too large in size to be easily portable and to be able to be carried around discreetly. Further modifications to the breath testing devices were therefore made to miniaturize them further, in particular so that they were small enough so that several could fit into thin breath strip containers which could be carried in a pocket or handbag.


Two miniaturized breath testing devices were therefore developed:


a) The first breath testing device (FIG. 7) was prepared by taking the article of example 8 (i.e. a drinking straw 40 into which a dye-treated tissue 42 had been inserted) and making the tube of the drinking straw shorter, for example, 4 cm long. The straw was then placed into a standard business card heated laminator (from Kinko's of Dallas, Tex.) so that the tube was flattened but air was still able to pass through the tube.


b) The second breath testing device (FIG. 6) was prepared by taking the article of example 9 (i.e. a drinking straw 44 having a dye-treated tissue strip 46 covering one end), and again cutting it to a length of approximately 4 cm. The straw was laminated as above.


Example 11

A dye-coated paper towel was attached to a 25 mm×50 mm strip of an adhesive-coated card material. The dye content on the paper towel varied depending on the sensitivity required for bad breath testing. Accordingly, 1 mg/ml stock solution of MH-dye was applied on a Snowtex®-O nanoparticle-coated Scott® paper towel and allowed to air dry, before being attached to the strip. A small straw was also placed onto the card and the device was packaged in a polyethylene film cover and the edges were heat sealed. A removable, peal-back polyethylene tab was then used to cover and temporarily seal the dye-coated paper towel. When the tab was pealed back and a user with bad breath exhaled onto the paper towel, the MH-dye turned colorless.


Example 12

Suitable dispensers for the breath testing devices were designed. These dispensers were relatively small, so that they could discreetly fit into a pocket, purse or handbag. Dispensers should also be inexpensive as the breath testing devices are intended to be disposable.


A small plastic rectangular dispenser (approximately 35 mm×60 mm×15 mm) which can hold about six breath testing devices of the type described in Example 10 was designed (FIG. 8), and a slightly larger dispenser for holding 12 breath testing articles is also envisaged. However, it should be clear that a dispenser could be sized to store any number of breath testing articles.


The dispenser 50 of this example was designed to be attachable to another dispenser 52 for breath mints, chewing gum, cigarettes or the like (FIG. 9). The dispensers are permanently attached to each other by means of a glue or double-sided tape in one embodiment. In an alternative embodiment, the dispenser 52 for the breath testing articles may have temporary attachment means, such as a magnet 54, or hook and loop fasteners (not shown) and can be attached to the second dispenser 52 as shown in FIG. 9, by means of an oppositely polarized magnet 56 attached to the other dispenser 52. Thus, the dispensers can be sold individually so that only one may be replaced at a time.


While the invention has been described in detail with respect to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various alterations, modifications and other changes may be made to the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the claims cover or encompass all such modifications, alterations and/or changes.

Claims
  • 1. A breath testing device comprising a substrate and a visual indicating agent contained on the substrate, wherein the visual indicating agent is color sensitive to at least one odorous compound present in the breath of a user, wherein the visual indicating agent contains 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)-benzhydrol, further wherein the substrate is configured to detect the odorous compound in a breath sample.
  • 2. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the odorous compound contains sulfur.
  • 3. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the odorous compound contains an amine.
  • 4. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the substrate contains nanoparticles.
  • 5. The breath testing device of claim 4, wherein the nanoparticles have an average length, width, height, and/or diameter of less than about 100 nanometers.
  • 6. The breath testing device of claim 4, wherein the nanoparticles have a surface area of from about 50 to about 1000 square meters per gram.
  • 7. The breath testing device of claim 4, wherein the nanoparticles include silica, alumina, or combinations thereof.
  • 8. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the substrate contains a fibrous material.
  • 9. The breath testing device of claim 8, wherein the fibrous material contains cellulosic fibers.
  • 10. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the substrate is planar.
  • 11. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the substrate is located within a passage of a carrier portion.
  • 12. The breath testing device of claim 11, wherein the carrier portion is a cylindrical structure.
  • 13. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the substrate covers an end of a carrier portion.
  • 14. The breath testing device of claim 1, wherein the visual indicating agent is applied to the substrate as a solution.
  • 15. The breath testing device of claim 14, wherein the concentration of the visual indicating agent is from about 0.001 to about 15% wt/wt.
  • 16. The breath testing device of claim 1, further comprising a zone having a reference color, the reference color being the color to which the indicating agent will change upon exposure to the odorous compound.
  • 17. A dispenser containing the breath testing device of claim 1.
  • 18. The dispenser of claim 17, further comprising at least one breath freshener, wherein the breath testing device and breath freshener are contained in different compartments of the dispenser.
  • 19. A breath testing device comprising a carrier portion defining a passage that is open at least one end, wherein the device contains visual indicating agent that is color sensitive to at least one odorous compound present in the breath of a user, wherein the visual indicating agent contains 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)-benzhydrol.
  • 20. The breath testing device of claim 19, wherein the substrate is located within a passage of a carrier portion.
  • 21. The breath testing device of claim 20, wherein the carrier portion is a cylindrical structure.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/134,547, filed on Jun. 6, 2008, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/687,270, filed on Oct. 16, 2003, which are incorporated herein in their its entirety by reference thereto.

US Referenced Citations (337)
Number Name Date Kind
2015864 Müller et al. Oct 1935 A
2429694 King Oct 1947 A
2534229 Carhart et al. Dec 1950 A
2593146 Howard Apr 1952 A
3033655 Grosskopf May 1962 A
3193404 Davis Jul 1965 A
3266973 Crowley Aug 1966 A
3338992 Kinney Aug 1967 A
3341394 Kinney Sep 1967 A
3381688 Satas May 1968 A
3494821 Evans Feb 1970 A
3502538 Petersen Mar 1970 A
3502763 Hartmann Mar 1970 A
3507269 Berry Apr 1970 A
3542615 Dobo et al. Nov 1970 A
3615478 Hoshino et al. Oct 1971 A
3692618 Dorschner et al. Sep 1972 A
3794497 Pratt Feb 1974 A
3802817 Matsuki et al. Apr 1974 A
3836633 Beschke Sep 1974 A
3849241 Butin et al. Nov 1974 A
3919437 Brown et al. Nov 1975 A
3960494 Verma et al. Jun 1976 A
3971665 Suzuki et al. Jul 1976 A
4006030 Yoshida et al. Feb 1977 A
4038101 Thompson Jul 1977 A
4041203 Brock et al. Aug 1977 A
4078029 Yoshida et al. Mar 1978 A
4100324 Anderson et al. Jul 1978 A
4101638 Inoue et al. Jul 1978 A
4144370 Boulton Mar 1979 A
4172781 Walk et al. Oct 1979 A
4297233 Gualandi Oct 1981 A
RE30797 Davis Nov 1981 E
RE30803 Davis Nov 1981 E
4313820 Farha, Jr. et al. Feb 1982 A
4340563 Appel et al. Jul 1982 A
4375448 Appel et al. Mar 1983 A
4407960 Tratnyek Oct 1983 A
4467012 Pedersen et al. Aug 1984 A
4469746 Weisman et al. Sep 1984 A
4488969 Hou Dec 1984 A
4494278 Kroyer et al. Jan 1985 A
4494629 Raeburn Jan 1985 A
4517308 Ehlenz et al. May 1985 A
4522203 Mays Jun 1985 A
4525410 Hagiwara et al. Jun 1985 A
4548906 Sekikawa et al. Oct 1985 A
4575556 Byrne et al. Mar 1986 A
4604313 McFarland et al. Aug 1986 A
4640810 Laursent et al. Feb 1987 A
4643801 Johnson Feb 1987 A
4655757 McFarland et al. Apr 1987 A
4701218 Barker et al. Oct 1987 A
4715983 Ota et al. Dec 1987 A
4725415 Kidd Feb 1988 A
4734324 Hill Mar 1988 A
RE32649 Brandt et al. Apr 1988 E
4769216 Chandler et al. Sep 1988 A
4775585 Hagiwara et al. Oct 1988 A
4777018 Auchincloss Oct 1988 A
4780448 Broecker et al. Oct 1988 A
4781858 Mizukami et al. Nov 1988 A
4783220 Gamble et al. Nov 1988 A
4798603 Meyer et al. Jan 1989 A
4802473 Hubbard et al. Feb 1989 A
4804630 Bhattacharjee Feb 1989 A
4818464 Lau Apr 1989 A
4823404 Morell et al. Apr 1989 A
4823803 Nakamura Apr 1989 A
4844867 Bäther Jul 1989 A
4853186 Mura et al. Aug 1989 A
4854332 Hanakura Aug 1989 A
4904304 Watanabe et al. Feb 1990 A
4947861 Hamilton Aug 1990 A
4969457 Hubbard et al. Nov 1990 A
4978615 Aoyama et al. Dec 1990 A
4988505 Watanabe et al. Jan 1991 A
5000746 Meiss Mar 1991 A
5020533 Hubbard et al. Jun 1991 A
5057302 Johnson et al. Oct 1991 A
5064473 Kubo et al. Nov 1991 A
5094962 Snyder et al. Mar 1992 A
5100581 Watanabe et al. Mar 1992 A
5100702 Maeda et al. Mar 1992 A
5108739 Kurihara et al. Apr 1992 A
5122418 Nakane et al. Jun 1992 A
5133803 Moffatt Jul 1992 A
5145518 Winnik et al. Sep 1992 A
5145727 Potts et al. Sep 1992 A
5169706 Collier, IV et al. Dec 1992 A
5174959 Kundu et al. Dec 1992 A
5178931 Perkins et al. Jan 1993 A
5183656 Uesaka et al. Feb 1993 A
5188885 Timmons et al. Feb 1993 A
5196177 Watanabe et al. Mar 1993 A
5204429 Kaminsky et al. Apr 1993 A
5209998 Kavassalis et al. May 1993 A
5220000 Theodoropulos Jun 1993 A
5221497 Watanabe et al. Jun 1993 A
5225374 Fare et al. Jul 1993 A
5230953 Tsugeno et al. Jul 1993 A
5238518 Okubi et al. Aug 1993 A
5245117 Withers et al. Sep 1993 A
5266289 Tsugeno et al. Nov 1993 A
5284703 Everhart et al. Feb 1994 A
5286624 Terashima et al. Feb 1994 A
5292868 Subramanian Mar 1994 A
5294717 Theodoropulos Mar 1994 A
5300365 Ogale Apr 1994 A
5322061 Brunson Jun 1994 A
5332432 Okubi et al. Jul 1994 A
5338713 Takagi et al. Aug 1994 A
5342876 Abe et al. Aug 1994 A
5350624 Georger et al. Sep 1994 A
5366947 Müller et al. Nov 1994 A
5382400 Pike et al. Jan 1995 A
5383450 Hubbard et al. Jan 1995 A
5389338 Fish Feb 1995 A
5397667 Law et al. Mar 1995 A
5407442 Karapasha Apr 1995 A
5407600 Ando et al. Apr 1995 A
5420016 Boguslaski et al. May 1995 A
5420090 Spencer et al. May 1995 A
5427844 Murai et al. Jun 1995 A
5429628 Trinh et al. Jul 1995 A
5432094 Delente Jul 1995 A
5451450 Erderly et al. Sep 1995 A
5458864 Tsugeno et al. Oct 1995 A
5467778 Catt et al. Nov 1995 A
5472775 Obijeski et al. Dec 1995 A
5480636 Maruo et al. Jan 1996 A
5486356 Yim Jan 1996 A
5487938 Spencer et al. Jan 1996 A
5488126 Subramanian et al. Jan 1996 A
5527171 Soerensen Jun 1996 A
5538548 Yamazaki Jul 1996 A
5539124 Etherton et al. Jul 1996 A
5540916 Parks Jul 1996 A
5547607 Ando et al. Aug 1996 A
5553608 Reese et al. Sep 1996 A
5554775 Krishnamurti et al. Sep 1996 A
5580655 El-Shall et al. Dec 1996 A
5583219 Subramanian et al. Dec 1996 A
5591797 Barthel et al. Jan 1997 A
5597512 Watanabe et al. Jan 1997 A
5657762 Coley et al. Aug 1997 A
5661198 Inatani et al. Aug 1997 A
5663224 Emmons et al. Sep 1997 A
5679138 Bishop et al. Oct 1997 A
5679724 Sacripante et al. Oct 1997 A
5695868 McCormack Dec 1997 A
5733272 Brunner et al. Mar 1998 A
5773227 Kuhn et al. Jun 1998 A
5795985 Hüsler et al. Aug 1998 A
5813398 Baird et al. Sep 1998 A
5817300 Cook et al. Oct 1998 A
5833952 Grigor et al. Nov 1998 A
5837352 English et al. Nov 1998 A
5843509 Calvo Salve et al. Dec 1998 A
5855788 Everhart et al. Jan 1999 A
5861144 Peterson et al. Jan 1999 A
5871872 Matijevic et al. Feb 1999 A
5874067 Lucas et al. Feb 1999 A
5880176 Kamoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5880309 Suzuki et al. Mar 1999 A
5882638 Dodd et al. Mar 1999 A
5885599 Peterson et al. Mar 1999 A
5897541 Uitenbroek et al. Apr 1999 A
5902226 Tasaki et al. May 1999 A
5905101 Fujiki et al. May 1999 A
5916596 Desai et al. Jun 1999 A
5948398 Hanamoto et al. Sep 1999 A
5948483 Kim et al. Sep 1999 A
5962566 Grandfils et al. Oct 1999 A
5964926 Cohen Oct 1999 A
5972389 Shell et al. Oct 1999 A
5985229 Yamada et al. Nov 1999 A
5989510 Abe et al. Nov 1999 A
5989515 Watanabe et al. Nov 1999 A
5989840 D'Angelo et al. Nov 1999 A
6004625 Ohshima Dec 1999 A
6007592 Kasai et al. Dec 1999 A
6024786 Gore Feb 2000 A
6039923 Klemm et al. Mar 2000 A
6045900 Haffner et al. Apr 2000 A
6047413 Welchel et al. Apr 2000 A
6057162 Rounbehler et al. May 2000 A
6060410 Gillberg-LaForce et al. May 2000 A
6073771 Pressley et al. Jun 2000 A
6075179 McCormack et al. Jun 2000 A
6096299 Guarracino et al. Aug 2000 A
6111163 McCormack et al. Aug 2000 A
6123676 Anapliotis Sep 2000 A
6171811 Becerro De Bengoa Vallejo Jan 2001 B1
6172173 Spencer et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177608 Weinstrauch Jan 2001 B1
6190814 Law et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193844 McLaughlin et al. Feb 2001 B1
6225524 Guarracino et al. May 2001 B1
6228605 Marshall May 2001 B1
6234974 Catt et al. May 2001 B1
6238767 McCormack et al. May 2001 B1
6254894 Denkewicz, Jr. et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264615 Diamond et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277346 Murasawa et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277772 Gancet et al. Aug 2001 B1
6291535 Watanabe et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294222 Cohen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299867 Aoyagi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309736 McCormack et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312918 Ito et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315864 Anderson et al. Nov 2001 B2
6334988 Gallis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344218 Dodd et al. Feb 2002 B1
6344272 Oldenburg et al. Feb 2002 B1
6358537 Hoshino et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358909 Ochomogo et al. Mar 2002 B1
6369290 Glaug et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376741 Guarracino et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387495 Reeves et al. May 2002 B1
6391262 Brinton et al. May 2002 B1
6398827 Ota et al. Jun 2002 B1
6403380 Catt et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406669 Duan et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410765 Wellinghoff et al. Jun 2002 B1
6425530 Coakley Jul 2002 B1
6427693 Blackstock et al. Aug 2002 B1
6428814 Bosch et al. Aug 2002 B1
6433243 Woltman et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440187 Kasai et al. Aug 2002 B1
6451619 Catt et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454726 Catt et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460989 Yano et al. Oct 2002 B1
6461735 Furuya et al. Oct 2002 B1
6467897 Wu et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468500 Sakaguchi et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475601 Sakaki et al. Nov 2002 B1
6479150 Liu et al. Nov 2002 B1
6479278 Marshall Nov 2002 B2
6491790 Proverb et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498000 Murasawa et al. Dec 2002 B2
6509169 Ratcliff et al. Jan 2003 B2
6517199 Tomioka et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531704 Yadav et al. Mar 2003 B2
6533826 Gessner et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536890 Kato et al. Mar 2003 B1
6544492 DeBerry Apr 2003 B1
6548264 Tan et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551457 Westman et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562441 Maeda et al. May 2003 B1
6575383 Dobler et al. Jun 2003 B2
6578521 Raymond et al. Jun 2003 B2
6585663 Coley et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589562 Shefer et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589761 Freadman et al. Jul 2003 B1
6607711 Pedersen Aug 2003 B2
6617488 Springer et al. Sep 2003 B1
6623848 Brehm et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627377 Itatani et al. Sep 2003 B1
6638918 Davison et al. Oct 2003 B2
6639004 Falat et al. Oct 2003 B2
6645569 Cramer et al. Nov 2003 B2
6693071 Ghosh et al. Feb 2004 B2
6706537 Ignacio et al. Mar 2004 B2
6818194 DeBerry et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821786 Rupp Nov 2004 B2
6825040 Scaringe et al. Nov 2004 B2
6927064 Catt et al. Aug 2005 B1
7014612 Hubbard et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022285 Arai et al. Apr 2006 B2
7052854 Melker et al. May 2006 B2
7101340 Braun Sep 2006 B1
7141518 MacDonald et al. Nov 2006 B2
20010000889 Yadav et al. May 2001 A1
20010023338 Guarracino et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010031248 Hall-Puzio et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010056246 Rodriguez-Fernandez Dec 2001 A1
20020005145 Sherman Jan 2002 A1
20020066542 Jakob et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091071 Fischer et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106466 Hausmann et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020110686 Dugan Aug 2002 A1
20020111561 Kaga et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128336 Kolb et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020142937 Carter et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020149656 Nohr et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150678 Cramer et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020176982 Rohrbaugh et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177621 Hanada Nov 2002 A1
20020182102 Fontenot et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020182658 Polak et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030003589 Khalil et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030013369 Soane et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021983 Nohr et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030050211 Hage et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056648 Fornai et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030070782 Proverb et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030082237 Cha et al. May 2003 A1
20030100842 Rosenberg et al. May 2003 A1
20030130631 Springer et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030147956 Shefer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030147966 Franzen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181540 Quellet et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030203009 MacDonald Oct 2003 A1
20030211618 Patel Nov 2003 A1
20030216660 Ben-Oren et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030235605 Lelah et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040029171 Wagner et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040033269 Hei et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034157 Ghosh et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040043688 Soerens et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040077093 Pan Apr 2004 A1
20040120904 Lye et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040120921 Quincy, III et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122387 Long et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040142041 MacDonald et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040175556 Clark et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040235183 Coley et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050012085 Lavi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050084412 MacDonald et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084438 Do et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084464 McGrath et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084474 Wu et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084632 Urlaub et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084977 Boga et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050112085 MacDonald et al. May 2005 A1
20050113771 MacDonald et al. May 2005 A1
20050124072 Boga et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050130311 Coley et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131363 MacDonald et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050164320 McDevitt et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171454 Catt et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186109 Nakamura et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050191704 Boga et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196812 Williams Sep 2005 A1
20060003336 Song et al. Jan 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
0103214 Mar 1984 EP
0232141 Aug 1987 EP
0251783 Jan 1988 EP
0282287 Sep 1988 EP
0339461 Nov 1989 EP
034897 Jan 1990 EP
0376448 Jul 1990 EP
0389015 Sep 1990 EP
0389023 Sep 1990 EP
0389023 Sep 1990 EP
0483500 May 1992 EP
0510619 Oct 1992 EP
0749295 Dec 1996 EP
0972563 Jan 2000 EP
10134800 Sep 2000 EP
1053788 Nov 2000 EP
1157672 Nov 2001 EP
1162172 Dec 2001 EP
1188854 Mar 2002 EP
1214878 Jun 2002 EP
1216675 Jun 2002 EP
1298071 Apr 2003 EP
1315526 Jun 2003 EP
62149322 Jul 1987 JP
3221142 Sep 1991 JP
WO8902698 Apr 1989 WO
WO9111977 Aug 1991 WO
WO9112029 Aug 1991 WO
WO9112030 Aug 1991 WO
WO9619346 Jun 1996 WO
WO9619346 Jun 1996 WO
WO9705482 Feb 1997 WO
WO9725076 Jul 1997 WO
WO9820915 May 1998 WO
WO9826808 Jun 1998 WO
WO9826808 Jun 1998 WO
WO9947252 Sep 1999 WO
WO0003797 Jan 2000 WO
WO0029036 Mar 2000 WO
WO0029036 Mar 2000 WO
WO00137764 Mar 2000 WO
WO0059555 Oct 2000 WO
WO0076558 Dec 2000 WO
WO0106054 Jan 2001 WO
WO0226272 Apr 2002 WO
WO0249559 Jun 2002 WO
WO02055115 Jul 2002 WO
WO02062881 Aug 2002 WO
WO02064877 Aug 2002 WO
WO02083297 Oct 2002 WO
WO02084017 Oct 2002 WO
WO02094329 Nov 2002 WO
WO02095112 Nov 2002 WO
WO03000979 Jan 2003 WO
WO03025067 Mar 2003 WO
WO03032959 Apr 2003 WO
WO03088931 Oct 2003 WO
WO03092885 Nov 2003 WO
WO04000986 Dec 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (72)
Entry
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP04255767 Sep. 10, 1992.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP05098185 Apr. 20, 1993.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP1262868 Oct. 19, 1989.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP198610366 Jan. 11, 1986.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP2001208753 Mar. 8, 2001.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP2157039 Jun. 15, 1990.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP3195562 Aug. 27, 1991.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP4335141 Nov. 24, 1992.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP5106199 Apr. 27, 1993.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP5261246 Oct. 12, 1993.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP57135360 Aug. 20, 1982.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP6285140 Oct. 11, 1994.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP63072337 Apr. 2, 1988.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP7256025 Oct. 9, 1995.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP8152409 Jun. 11, 1996.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP9143872 Jun. 3, 1997.
Abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP92067913 Oct. 29, 1992.
Abstract of SU834073 May 30, 1981.
Abstract of Article—Non-hydrothermal synthesis of copper-, zinc- and copper-zinc hydrosilicates, T. M. Yurieva et al., Materials Research Innovations, vol. 5, No. 1, Jun. 2001, pp. 3-11.
Article—A new method for predicting and confirming ovulation, Albrecht, B.H. et al., (1985), Fertility and Sterility, 44(2), 200-5.
Article—A Relationship Between Human Oral Bacteria and the Menstrual Cycle, Prout, R.E., et al, (1970), The Journal of Periodontology, pp. 30-33.
Article—A sorbent tube for oral malodour monitoring, Julia Rodríguez-Fernández et al., Talanta, vol. 62, 2004, pp. 421-426.
Article—Adsorption of Dyes on Nanosize Modified Silica Particles, Guangwei Wu et al., Journal of Colloid and Interface Sciences, vol. 195, 1997, pp. 222-228.
Article—Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers, Stephen Brunauer et al., The Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 60, Feb. 1938, pp. 309-319.
Article—Adsorption of Proteins and Antibiotics on Porous Alumina Membranes, Yi Hua Ma et al., Fundamentals of Adsorption, vol. 80, 1992, pp. 389-396.
Article—Ammonia vapour in the mouth as a diagnostic marker for Helicobacter pylori infection: preliminary “proof of principle” pharmacological investigations, C. D. R. Dunn et al., British Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 58, 2001, pp. 66-76.
Article—Applicability of a SPME method for the Rapid Determination of VOCs, Bénéet al., Chimia, vol. 56, No. 6, 2002, pp. 289-291.
Article—Breath biomarkers for detection of human liver diseases, preliminary study, Sehnert, S.S. et al., (2002), Biomarkers, 7, 174-187.
Article—Breath pentane analysis as an index of lipid peroxidation, a functional test of vitamin E status, Lemoyne, M. et al., (1987), American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, 267-272.
Article—Changes in Concentration of Volatile Sulfur Compounds of Mouth Air during the Menstrual Cycle, Tonzetich, J. et al., (1978A), Journal of International Medical Research, 6, 245-254.
Article—Characterisation of novel modified active carbons and marine algal biomass for the selective adsorption of lead, Malik et al., Water Research, vol. 36, 2002, pp. 1527-1538.
Article—Comparison of non-invasive tests to detect helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents, results of a multicenter European study, Megraud, F. et al., (2005), Journal of Pediatrics, 146, 198-203.
Article—Development of novel dye-doped silica nanoparticles for biomarker application, Swadeshmukul Santra et al., Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 6, No. 2, Apr. 2001, pp. 160-166.
Article—E-nose technologies promise new diagnostic instruments, Skelley, D.S., (2000), IVD Technology, Jan.-Feb. issue.
Article—Exhaled nitric oxide, the missing link between asthma and obesity, de Winder-de Groot et al., (2005), Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 115, 419-420.
Article—Fe-MCM-41 for Selective Epoxidation of Styrene with Hydrogen Peroxide, Qinghong Zhang et al., The Chemical Society of Japan, Chemistry Letters 2001, pp. 946-947.
Article—From Cyclodextrin Assemblies to Porous Materials by Silica Templating, Sebastian Polarz et al., Angew. Chem. Int., vol. 40, No. 23, 2001, pp. 4417-4421.
Article—Grafting of Poly (ethylenimine) onto Mesylated Cellulose Acetate, Poly (methyl methacrylate) and Poly(vinyl chloride), Christopher J. Biermann et al., Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 12, 1990, pp. 323-327.
Article—Immobilization of (n-Bu4N)4W10O32on Mesoporous MCM-41 and Amorphous Silicas for Photocatalytic Oxidation of Cycloalkanes with Molecular Oxygen, Andrea Maldotti et al., Journal of Catalysis, vol. 209, 2002, pp. 210-216.
Article—Immunization of mice with peptomers covalently couopled to aluminum oxide nanoparticles, Andreas Frey et al., Vaccine, vol. 17, 1999, pp. 3007-3019.
Article—Increase in exhaled carbon dioxide during exacerbations of cystic fibrosis, Antuni, J.D. et al., (2000), Thorax, 55, 138-142.
Article—Increase of acetone and ammonia in urine headspace and breath during ovulation quantified using selected ion tube mass spectrometry, Diskin, A.M. et al., (2003), Physiological Measurement, 24, 191-199.
Article—Increased carbon monoxide in exhaled air of asthmatic patients, Zayasu, K. et al., (1997), Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, 156, 1140-1143.
Article—Increased carbon monoxide in exhaled air of subjects with upper respiratory tract infections Yamaya, M. et al., (1998), Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, 158, 311-314.
Article—Increased levels of exhaled carbon monoxide in bronchiectasis, a new marker of oxidative stress, Horvath, I., et al, (1998), Thorax, 53, 867-870.
Article—Ion-trap detection of volatile organic compounds in alveolar breath, Philips, M. et al., (1992), Clinical Chemistry, 38, 60-65.
Article—Mesoporous Sieves with Unified Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Frameworks, Brian J. Melde et al., Chem. Mater., vol. 11, No. 11, 1999, pp. 3302-3308.
Article—Nanoparticles based on polyelectrolyte complexes: effect of structure and net charge on the sorption capability for solved organic molecules, H.-M. Buchhammer et al., Colloid Polym. Sci., vol. 278, 2000, pp. 841-847.
Article—On-Line Detection of Volatile Compounds in Human Breath, Bischoff, et al., (2000), 4thEuropean Congress of Oto-Rhino Laryngology, head and neck surgery, pp. 1369-1375.
Article—Optical fibre sensor for hydrogen sulphide monitoring in mouth air, Julio Rodríguez-Fernández et al., Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 471, 2002, pp. 13-23.
Article—Oral malodour: an indicator of health status and oral cleanliness, Tonzetich, J., (1978B), International Dental Journal, 28, 309-19.
Article—Ovulation prediction from cyclic changes in salivary electrical conductivity, Loweit, K. et al., (1990), American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 163(2), 708-710.
Article—Pitfalls in the use of breath pentane measurements to assess lipid peroxidation, Springfield, J.R. et al., (1994), Journal of Lipid Research, 35, 1497-1504.
Article—Purification and Characterization of Urease from Helicobacter pylori, Bruce E. Dunn et al., The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, No. 16, Jun. 5, 1990, pp. 9464-1990.
Article—Relationship between stressful situations, salivary flow rate and oral volatile sulfur-containing compounds; Queiroz, C.S. et al., (2002), European Journal of Oral Sciences, 110, 337-340.
Article—Sanguinaria extract, a new agent for the control of volatile sulfur compounds in the oral cavity, Boulware, et al., Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, 1985, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 297-302.
Article—Saponins and Sapogenins. VIII. Surface Films of Echinocystic Acid and Derivatives, C. R. Noller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 60, 1938, 3 pages.
Article—Shaping exhale durations for breath CO detection for men with mild mental retardation, Rea, J. et al., (2002), Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 415-418.
Article—Significance of Ammonia in the Genesis of Gastric Epithelial Lesions Induced by Helicobacter pylori: An in vitro Study with Different Bacterial Strains and Urea Concentrations, P. Sommi et al., Digestion, vol. 57, 1996, pp. 299-304.
Article—Significance of ammonia produced by Helicobacter pylori, Shigeji Ito et al., European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 6, No. 2, 1994, pp. 167-174.
Article—Sniffing Sinusitis, Felton, M.J., (2004), Today's Chemist At Work, Jun. 2004 (http://www.tcawonline.org).
Article—Spectrophotometric Assay of Thiols, Peter C. Jocelyn, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 142, 1987, pp. 44-67.
Article—Standard Practice for Obtaining Spectrometric Data for Object-Color Evaluation, Published by ASTM International, Designation: E 1164-02.
Article—Structure and properties of silica nanoclusters at high temperatures, I. V. Schweigert et al., The American Physical Society, Physical Review B, vol. 65. No. 235410, pp. 1-9.
Article—Study of the urea thermal decomposition (pyrolysis) reaction and importance to cyanuric acid production, Peter M. Schaber et al., American Laboratory, Aug. 1999, pp. 13-21.
Article—Synthesis of porous Silica with help from cyclodextrin aggregates, Markus Antonietti, Max-Planck-Institut für Kolloid-und, Germany, 1 page.
Article—The Colloid Chemistry of Silica, American Chemical Society 200thNational Meeting, Aug. 26-31, 1990, pp. 22-23 and pp. 52-59.
Article—Validation of13C-Urea Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in the Singapore Population, T. S. Chua et al., Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 43, No. 8, 2002, pp. 408-411.
Paper—Uniform Deposition of Ultrathin Polymer Films on the Surfaces of Al2O3Nanoparticles by a Plasma Treatment, Donglu Shi et al., University of Cincinnati and University of Michigan, Jun. 2000, pp. 1-15.
Pocket Guide to Digital Printing, Frank Cost, Delmar Publishers, Albany, NY, ISBN 0-8273-7592-1, pp. 144-145.
Product Information Sheet for Snowtex®, 6 pages.
Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2004/027626 dated Jul. 13, 2005, 17 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130261486 A1 Oct 2013 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12134547 Jun 2008 US
Child 13549550 US
Parent 10687270 Oct 2003 US
Child 12134547 US