The present invention relates to the interconnection of electrical distribution elements and, in particular, to the interconnection between a loadbreak elbow terminator and a bushing.
Electrical distribution equipment, such as a deadfront switch gear arrangement, typically includes fixed electrical bushings which are to be connected to external electrical cables. The fixed bushings are mounted in a wall of the electrical equipment and have their outer ends arranged to be connected to the cables.
One way of achieving this connection is by inserting an elbow terminator onto the bushing, the terminator being coupled to the cable. The elbow terminator, which typically comprises a tapered socket in which an electrical probe is mounted, is intended to be inserted onto the fixed bushing such that a tapered tongue of the bushing enters the socket. In so doing, a conductive tube disposed within the tongue makes electrical connection with the probe, thereby connecting the cable to the fixed bushing.
The elbow terminator is secured to the bushing by means of a latching ring disposed at an inner end of the socket. That latching ring snaps into an annular latching groove formed in the outer periphery of the leading end of the tongue when the elbow terminator is pushed onto the fixed bushing.
The elbow terminator is maneuvered onto the bushing by means of a hand-held shotgun stick which grabs a hook eye affixed to the elbow terminator. It may occur, however, that the tongue does not completely enter the socket, whereby the latching ring does not tightly grip the latching socket. That unlatched condition, which is potentially dangerous, is difficult for the operator to visually detect, especially since the operator will likely be standing remotely (e.g., at least three to five feet) from the terminator and bushing, for safety reasons.
It would therefore be desirable to facilitate the ability of the operator to detect an unlatched condition, especially when standing remotely of the terminator and bushing.
The present invention relates to the combination of an electrical terminator and an electrical bushing component. The terminator includes a socket, and the bushing component includes a tongue receivable in the socket to electrically interconnect the terminator and bushing. The tongue and socket include a latching arrangement for positively latching the bushing component and terminator together when the tongue enters the socket to a prescribed depth. First and second visual indicators are disposed on outer peripheries of the bushing component and the terminator, respectively. The first and second visual indicators are arranged so that when the terminator is longitudinally inserted onto the bushing, the first and second indicators longitudinally approach one another sufficiently to at least become radially aligned with one another in order to provide a visual indication of positive latching. One of the first and second indicators is situated radially outside of the other of the indicator and is visible when the combination is viewed in a radially inward direction passing through the one indicator.
In another aspect of the invention, an indicator is defined by a color band formed on one of the terminator and bushing component (preferably on the bushing component) and is arranged to be radially covered by an indicator in the form of a covering portion of the other of the terminator and bushing component (preferably the terminator) when the tongue enters the socket to the prescribed depth, thereby providing a visual indication of positive latching.
The present invention also relates to an electrical bushing component which-possesses the color band, and also to a method of connecting an electrical terminator to an electrical bushing component which involves causing the color band to be covered when positive latching occurs.
The objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment thereof in connection with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals designate like elements and in which:
Depicted in
The tongue 22 is configured to make an interference fit within the socket 14. Adjoining the tongue 22 is a cylindrical enlargement 24 configured to enter the cylindrical portion 15. The tongue 22 is hollow and includes a contact tube 26 (see
An end of the tongue 22 includes a latching groove 32. When the elbow terminator is pushed onto the bushing 12, the latching groove 32 receives, by snap fit, a latching ring 34 formed on a semiconducting insert 35 at an inner end of the socket 14. In that fashion, the bushing becomes secured to the elbow terminator.
As thus far described, the elbow terminator 10 and bushing 12 are conventional. The elbow terminator is maneuvered onto the bushing 12 by a conventional shotgun stick (not shown) which is manipulated manually by an operator. The shotgun stick includes a hook which grips a hook eye 38 carried by the elbow terminator. As explained earlier, it may occur that the tongue does not fully enter the socket, so that the latching ring 34 does not completely enter the latching groove 32. In that event, the bushing could become dislodged from the elbow terminator 10.
That problem is avoided by the present invention which involves the addition of a visual indicating arrangement which visually indicates when the tongue has entered the socket to a sufficient longitudinal depth to ensure latching. The visual indicating arrangement comprises cooperative visual indicators positioned on the bushing and elbow terminator such that the location of the visual indicators relative to one another in the longitudinal direction is readily visible to the operator. When the visual indicators attain a certain longitudinal relationship, it is ensured that positive latching has occurred. The edge 56 is visible when the bushing 12 is viewed in a radially inward direction D passing through the edge 56, as is evident from
The visual indicators comprise an indicator gauge 40 disposed exteriorly on the bushing 12, and an indicator ring 42 disposed exteriorly on the elbow terminator 10. The indicator ring 42 encircles the outer periphery of the elbow terminal at the entrance to the cylindrical portion 15 and forms a shoulder 44 which defines a mark in the form of an annular edge indicator or witness line 46.
The indicator gauge 40 includes an annular base portion 48 which encircles the outer periphery of the bushing at a location remote from the leading end thereof, remote from the latching groove 32 for the preferred version.
Projecting radially inwardly from an inner diameter of the base portion 48 is an annular ridge 50 configured to snap into a corresponding annular depression formed in the bushing. The semiconductive ground shield 52 could be modified to provide an appropriate surface in which the annular depression can be formed. Alternatively, the semiconductive ground shield 52 could be modified to include the spaced tabs 54 as an integral, i.e., one-piece, part.
Projecting longitudinally from the base 48 is a plurality of circumferentially spaced tabs 54. Each tab 54 includes a beveled free end 55 which defines a mark in the form of a circumferentially extending indicator edge 56 at a radially inner portion of that free end 55. The tabs 54 are of a prescribed length so that when the tongue 22 enters the socket 14 to a longitudinal depth sufficient to ensure positive latching by the latching ring 34 and latching groove 32, the indicator edges 46, 56 will either be radially aligned with one another (as shown in
The beveling of the free ends 55 of the tabs makes it easier for the operator to observe the indicator edges 56. By forming the tabs 54 on an annular base 48, the tabs can be conveniently mounted as a unit on the bushing. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that, depending upon the configuration of the outer periphery of the bushing, it may be possible to mold the bushing with tabs in lieu of providing a snap-on base 48 to which the tabs are mounted.
It may also be desirable to reverse the parts, i.e., to provide the gauge tabs 54 on the terminator and provide the indicator ring 42 on the bushing.
The indicator ring 42 could comprise an integral, one-piece portion of the terminator housing, or a separately attached piece.
It may be desirable to color the gauge tabs 54 differently from the indicator ring 42 in order to contrast the edges 46, 56 as much as possible and thereby, facilitate a proper observation by the operator. While in the disclosed preferred embodiment the indicator gauge 40 is disposed on a bushing, it will be appreciated that the indicator gauge could also be disposed on a bushing insert which is to be mounted to a bushing. Bushings (such as, for example, LBC devices, standoffs, and one-piece bushings) and bushing inserts can be generically referred to as “bushing components”.
A second embodiment of the invention, depicted in
The visual indicator 114 on the bushing is in the form of an annular color band of width W formed directly on the outer surface of the tongue 118 of the bushing. The color of the band 114 sharply contrasts with that of an adjacent portion 120 of the tongue 118 and also with that of the outer surface of the flange 116. Preferably, the band color is of a highly visible nature, such as a bright dayglow color like yellow, orange, lime green, etc., which is readily visible from at least a three to five foot distance. The color of an adjacent-portion of the tongue would be formed of a contrastingly dark color such as brown or gray.
The band 114 forms an edge indicator or witness line 122 at its junction with the adjacent portion 120 of the tongue. Likewise, the end flange 116 of the terminator defines an edge indicator 124.
The relationship between the edge indicators 122, 124 is such that when the terminator is longitudinally inserted onto the bushing sufficiently far for positive latching to occur in the manner described earlier herein, the edge indicators 122, 124 will have longitudinally approached one another sufficiently to be at least radially aligned with one another. That is, when positive latching has occurred, the color band 114 will, be completely disposed within the socket portion 115 and no longer visible.
That indication will be discernable by an operator who views the bushing in a radial direction (i.e., radially with reference to the longitudinal axis thereof), from a distance of at least three to five feet. This enables the operator to maintain a safety distance while determining that latching has occurred.
The color band 114 can be applied in any suitable manner, preferably by applying a colored ink by means of a roller traveling around the outer periphery of the tongue. The band 114 is preferably circumferentially continuous, but it could be interrupted as well, since it is only required that the band be at least partly visible when there is no positive latching, and be invisible when there is positive latching.
The radial distance between the color band 114 and the longitudinal center axis of the tongue is larger than the radial distance between the axis and all portions of the outer circumferential surface of the tongue 118 situated between the color band and a free end 130 of the tongue, as is clear from
Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modification, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/623,802, filed Nov. 23, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,399,771; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/275,491, filed Jan. 10, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,642,465; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/412,683, filed Apr. 14, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,984,791; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/198,963, filed Jul. 22, 2002, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/821,760, filed Mar. 20, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,103; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/262,460, filed Jun. 20, 1994, now abandoned all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1752865 | Thorpe | Nov 1927 | A |
1783062 | Trencham | Nov 1930 | A |
1997081 | Reynolds | Apr 1935 | A |
2688498 | Wilson | Oct 1951 | A |
2605389 | Kimball | Jul 1952 | A |
2667532 | Ewer | Jan 1954 | A |
2914344 | Anthes | Apr 1955 | A |
2892991 | Beebee | Jun 1959 | A |
3392363 | Geis, Jr. et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
3474386 | Link | Oct 1969 | A |
3509518 | Phillips | Apr 1970 | A |
3513425 | Arndt | May 1970 | A |
3652975 | Keto | Mar 1972 | A |
3663928 | Keto et al. | May 1972 | A |
3670287 | Keto | Jun 1972 | A |
3678432 | Boliver | Jul 1972 | A |
3720904 | De Sio | Mar 1973 | A |
3727951 | Shire | Apr 1973 | A |
3826860 | De Sio et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3835439 | Yonkers | Sep 1974 | A |
3860322 | Sankey et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3915534 | Yonkers | Oct 1975 | A |
3953099 | Wilson | Apr 1976 | A |
3955874 | Boliver | May 1976 | A |
3957332 | Lambert, III | May 1976 | A |
3960433 | Boliver | Jun 1976 | A |
4067636 | Boliver et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4113339 | Eley | Sep 1978 | A |
4123131 | Pearce, Jr. et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4210381 | Borgstrom | Jul 1980 | A |
4223179 | Lusk et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4260214 | Dorn | Apr 1981 | A |
H280 | Thingpen | Jun 1987 | H |
4722694 | Makal et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4793637 | Laipply | Dec 1988 | A |
4822291 | Cunningham | Apr 1989 | A |
4863392 | Borgstrom et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4867687 | Williams et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4911655 | Pinyan | Mar 1990 | A |
4972049 | Muench | Nov 1990 | A |
5002315 | Bartholomew | Mar 1991 | A |
5114357 | Luzzi | May 1992 | A |
5130495 | Thompson | Jul 1992 | A |
5213517 | Kerek et al. | May 1993 | A |
5221220 | Roscizewski | Jun 1993 | A |
5230640 | Tardif et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5248263 | Sakurai et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5266041 | De Luca | Nov 1993 | A |
5356304 | Colleran | Oct 1994 | A |
5358420 | Cairns et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5393240 | Makal et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5433622 | Galambos | Jul 1995 | A |
5492487 | Cairns et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5641306 | Stepniak | Jun 1997 | A |
5641310 | Tiberio, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5655921 | Makal et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5795180 | Siebens | Aug 1998 | A |
5816835 | Meszaros | Oct 1998 | A |
5857862 | Muench et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5957712 | Stepniak | Sep 1999 | A |
6168447 | Stepniak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6213799 | Jazowski et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6504103 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6585531 | Stepniak et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6984791 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
8399771 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2254493 | Oct 1992 | GB |
62-198677 | Dec 1987 | JP |
S6393081 | Jun 1988 | JP |
1-175181 | Jul 1989 | JP |
H-3-88279 | Sep 1991 | JP |
H-4-54164 | May 1992 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Ex Parte Reexamination Decision on Petition, Reexamination Control No. 90/008,386, Patent No. 6,504,103, mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
Ex Parte Reexamination Decision on Request for Rehearing, Appeal 2011-008241, Reexamination Control No. 90/008,386, Patent No. 6,504,103, mailed Jul. 25, 2012, 26 pages. |
Inter Parte Reexamination Decision on Petition, Reexamination Control No. 95/000,209, Patent No. 6,984,791, mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
Inter Parte Reexamination Decision on Request for Rehearing, Appeal 2011-008268, Reexamination Control No. 95/000,209, Patent No. 6,984,791, mailed Jul. 25, 2012, 26 pages. |
Declaration of Larry Siebens, 2nd Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, 4 pgs. |
Thomas & Betts Corp. et al v. Hubbell Inc.et al., Complaint filed Apr. 11, 2005. |
RTE Corporation—“RTE Transformer Components,” Mar. 30, 1978. |
Amerace Corporation Elastimold Division “New Dimension in Loadbreak,” Feb. 1, 1974, pp. 1-8. |
Steve Larson, “3.5kV Elbow Backoff & Loadbreak Problems”, Pacific Power Internal Correspondence, Aug. 24, 1987, 17 pages. |
Roger Provencal, “35kV LB Switching Working Conference” Elastimold Division, Amerace Corporation, Aug. 8, 1998, 1 page. |
Thomas Champion, “An Overview of Failure Analysis”, Sep. 17, 1996, pp. 1-17. |
Frank Stepniak, “Effects of Partial Vacuum on 35kV Seperable Connector Switching Performance”, Sep. 16, 1996, 8 pages. |
Steve Larson, “Elastimold 35kV Elbow/Bushing Interface Failures”, Pacific Power Internal Correspondence, Jan. 29, 1988, 2 pages. |
“Cooper Posi-Break Elbow and Cap”, Cooper Power Systems, 1988. |
“Get Smart, A Current Issues Newsletter for the Utility Products Salesforce”, Egal Industries, Inc.—Utility Group, Jun. 1994, 4 pages. |
John Makal, “ICC Task Force 10-50, Meeting Minutes Nov. 5, 1991”, Apr. 22, 1992, 1 page. |
“Joy Break Safe Bushing Plug 15kV, 200 amp, Operation and Warranty,” Joy Manufacturing Company, Dec. 1971, 3 pages. |
“Loadbreak Apparatus Connectors,” Cooper Power Systems, 200 A 25kV Class Loadbreak Bushing Insert, Jan. 1997, 7 pgs. |
“200 A 25 kV Class Cooper POSI-BREAK Loadbreak Elbow Connector,” Cooper Power Systems, Jan. 1998, 6 pages. |
J.M. Makal, “Low Current Switching Phenomena,” Sep. 1996, Cooper Power Systems, 23 paggs. |
“Minutes of the 100th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Nov. 3-6, 1996, 43 pgs. |
“Minutes of the 101st Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 20-23, 1997, 5 pgs. |
“Minutes of the 102nd Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Nov. 2-5, 1997, 52 pgs. |
“Minutes of the 84th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 26-23, 1989, 7 pages. |
“Minutes of the 86th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 29-May 2, 1990, 6 pages. |
“Minutes of the 90th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 26-29, 1992. |
“RTE Transformer Components—8.3 V o—GND Air SBT Bushing” RTE Corporation, Section 1110, Jan. 3, 1978, 3 pgs. |
“Minutes of the 92nd Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Nov. 8-11, 1992, 4 pages. |
“Minutes of the 95th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, May 22-25, 1994, 6 pages. |
“Minutes of the 97th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 9-12, 1995, 3 pages. |
“Minutes of the 99th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 14-17, 1996, 5 pages. |
“Notice—Elastimold Product Bulletin,” PB: 400-10-91, Oct. 21, 1991, 1 page. |
Gail Shaw, “Operation of 35kV Underground Systems,” Pacific Power & Light Company, Jun. 27, 1984, 10 pages. |
Letter from Kevin Jakel to David H. Tannenbaum; Response to Request for Sworn Testimony from Steve Larson, Frank Stepniak, and Roger Provencal; Jun. 25, 2007, 3 pages. |
Frank Stepniak, “Resolution of the Flashover Problem,” Elastimold Correspondence, Feb. 27, 1998, F. Stepniak, 18 pages. |
Letter from David H. Tannenbaum to Kevin Jakel; Request for Sworn Testimony from Steve Larson, Frank Stepniak, and Roger Provencal; Jun. 13, 2007, 2 pages. |
“Safe-T-Ring Collar—An Anti-Vacuum Device,” 9U02RING, Advertisement;Jan. 2000, Hubbell Power Systems Inc., 3 pgs. |
“Seperable Insulated Connector Systems for Power Distribution Systems Above 600V” American National Standard [ANSI] IEEE Standard, Jun. 25, 1985,29 pages. |
Plaintiff's Markman Claim Construction Brief, including Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9, filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Dec. 17, 2007, 125 pgs. |
Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Certain Documents are Not Printed Publications Under 35 U.S.C. §102 filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 26 pg. |
Amended Agreed Protective Order executed by Charles Everingham IV, U.S. Magistrate Judge in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Nov. 20, 2007, 15 pgs. |
Declaration of Frank Muench with Exhibit A, Submitted under 37 CFR 1.131, Mar. 12, 2007, 10 pages. |
Declaration of Frank Muench with Exhibit A, Submitted under 37 CFR 1.131, Jun. 11, 2008, 70 pages. |
Declaration of Elizabeth Ducote with Exhibits A-D (A, B, C are Redacted), Nov. 30, 2007, 38 pages. |
Declaration of Henry Hecker with Exhibits A-D, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 6, 2007, 44 pages. |
Declaration of Craig Wahlgren with Exhibits A-M, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 12, 2007, 45 pages. |
Declaration of Andrew Meyer with Exhibit A, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 12, 2007, 6 pages. |
Declaration of Andrew Meyer with Exhibits A-B, Submitted under 37 CFR 1.131, Jul. 12, 2007, 35 pages. |
Declaration of John Makal, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 12, 2007, 47 pages. |
Declaration of Larry Siebens with Exhibit A, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 13, 2007, 12 pages. |
Declaration of Frank Stepniak with Exhibits A-D, 1st Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Dec. 18, 2006, 39 pages. |
Declaration of Frank Stepniak with Exhibits A-G (E Redacted), 2nd Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 8, 2007, 86 pages. |
Declaration of Frank Stepniak with Exhibits A-F (F Redacted), 3rd Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Dec. 21, 2007, 53 pgs. |
Declaration of William A. Thue with Exhibit A, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 3, 2007, 15 pages. |
Declaration of William A. Thue in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 28, 2008, 128 pages. |
Declaration of Kevin W. Jakel, Jul. 28, 2008, 66 pages. |
Declaration of Steve Larson with Exhibit A-B, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 9, 2007, 24 pages. |
Declaration of Steve Larson with Exhibit A in Request for Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,504,103B1, Nov. 30, 2006, 20 pgs. |
Declaration of Roger Provencal with Exhibit A-B, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 9, 2007, 11 pages. |
“Elastimold, New Dimension in Loadbreak,” Section No. 410-50, Elastimold Div. Amerace Corporation 1974. |
Exhibits 1-17 Filed With the Requests for Reexaminations Application No. 90/008,386 and Application No. 95/000,209. |
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,984,791, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,209 Dec. 21, 2006, 130 pgs. |
Request for Ex Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,504,103, U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,386; Dec. 21, 2006, pp. 1-55. |
“RTE Safe Break Terminator—Electrical Application and Operating Instruction,” Manual 1067, RTE Corporation, 1967. |
Second Supplemental Reply to Office Action filed Mar. 4, 2009 in U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386, 4 pages. |
Request for Reconsideration of Entry of Supplemental Replies filed Apr. 8, 2009 in U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386 4 pages. |
Petition to Enter Supplemental Reply filed Apr. 7, 2009 in U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386 6 pages. |
Cooper Technologies Company v. Hubbell, Inc., Complaint filed in Civil Docket No. 06-cv-0520, Apr. 26, 2006, 23 pgs. |
“Qualitative Evaluation of 15kV Loadbreak Designs,” R.J. Stanger, Elastimold Division, Amerace Corporation, Aug. 16, 1973. |
Defendant's Claim Construction Brief and Opposition to Plaintiff's Claim Construction Brief filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 11, 2008, 37 pages. |
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 8, 2008, 9:00 a.m., pp. 1-92, inc. glossary, pp. 1-13. |
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 8, 2008, 1:30 p.m., pp. 1-166, inc. glossary, pp. 1-23. |
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 9, 2008, 8:30 a.m., pp. 1-160, inc. glossary, pp. 1-19. |
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 9, 2008, 1:15 p.m., pp. 1-200, inc. glossary, pp. 1-24. |
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 10, 2008, 8:30 a.m., pp. 1-156, inc. glossary, pp. 1-19. |
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 10, 2008, 1:15 p.m., pp. 1-180, inc. glossary, pp. 1-23. |
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 11, 2008, 8:30 a.m., pp. 1-173, inc. glossary, pp. 1-23. |
Verdict Form, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-cv-242, 9 pages. |
Memorandum Opinion and Order (claim construction) filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Feb. 15, 2008, 14 pgs. |
Plaintiff's Reply Markman Claim Construction Brief and Opposition to Defendants' Claim Construction Brief filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 22, 2008, 20 pgs. |
Claim Construction Chart-Disputed and Agreed Terms Pursuant to P.R. 4-5(d)(1) filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 18, 2008, 19 pgs. |
Deposition of Frank Muench, Mar. 26, 2008, pp. 1-292; Index pp. 1-33. |
“Minutes/Meeting Notice on Application Guide for Separable Connectors” IEEE Distribution Subcommittee, Feb. 1994, 12 pages. |
Order Granting Motion to Dismiss in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 23, 2009, 1 page. |
Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 22, 2009, 4 pgs. |
Defendant's Sur-Reply; Supporting Opposition to Cooper Motion for Partial Summary Judgement; Certain Documents under USC 102 in Civil Dkt No. 2:06-CV-242, Aug. 20, 2008, 15 pgs. |
Affidavit (James Beebe Declaration) in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgement; including Exhibits 1-3 in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 19 pages. |
Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Aug. 8, 2008, 18 pgs. |
Defendant's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Aug. 8, 2008, 40 pgs. |
Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 28, 2008, 190 pgs. |
Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Jul. 28, 2008, 1 pg. |
Exhibits B-H in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Due to Anticipation and Obviousness filed in Civil Dkt No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 65 pages. |
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Due to Anticipation and Obviousness filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 50 pages. |
Affidavit of Henry Hecker in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 7, 2008, 4 pgs. |
Notice of Abandonment dated Dec. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333. |
Non Final Office Action dated May 6, 1994 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/038,335. |
Notice of Abandonment dated Jan. 9, 1995 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/038,335. |
Notice of Abandonment dated Apr. 11, 1997 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460. |
Advisory Action dated Mar. 6, 1997 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 1996 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460. |
Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 17, 1996 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460. |
Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 1995 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460. |
Notice of Abandonment dated May 30, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 17, 2001 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 1997 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 1998 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Notice of Abandonment dated Jun. 2, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/198,963. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 14, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/198,963. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 13, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,683. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,683. |
Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,683. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 21, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 18, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 26, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Non Final Office Action dated May 14, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333. |
Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333. |
Examiner's Answer dated Sep. 24, 1998 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Decision on Petition dated Sep. 26, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Issue Notification dated Jul. 25, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Notice of Withdrawal from Issue dated Aug. 9, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Response to Amendment under Rule 312 dated Nov. 13, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491. |
Decision on Appeal dated Aug. 22, 2001 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760. |
Examiner's Answer dated Dec. 24, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,386. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2009 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386. |
Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2008 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386. |
Action Closing Prosecution dated Nov. 1, 2007 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 95/000,209. |
Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2007 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 95/000,209. |
Examiner's Answers dated Mar. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,209. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130149892 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12623802 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13762490 | US | |
Parent | 11275491 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 12623802 | US | |
Parent | 10412683 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 11275491 | US | |
Parent | 10198963 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10412683 | US | |
Parent | 08821760 | Mar 1997 | US |
Child | 10198963 | US | |
Parent | 08262460 | Jun 1994 | US |
Child | 08821760 | US |