Visual latching indicator arrangement for an electrical bushing and terminator

Abstract
An elbow terminator has a socket in which an electrical probe is disposed. The terminator is insertable onto an electrical bushing such that a tongue of the bushing is received in the socket of the terminator, and the probe of the terminator is electrically coupled to a contact sleeve disposed within the tongue. A latching mechanism produces positive latching between the tongue and socket when the tongue has been inserted to a predescribed depth within the socket. In order to enable an operator to visually observe that the tongue has been inserted to the prescribed depth, the bushing carries a color band which becomes completely disposed (invisible) in the socket when positive latching occurs. Alternatively, the bushing can be provided with gauge tabs which become aligned with a witness line formed on the terminator when positive latching occurs.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the interconnection of electrical distribution elements and, in particular, to the interconnection between a loadbreak elbow terminator and a bushing.


Electrical distribution equipment, such as a deadfront switch gear arrangement, typically includes fixed electrical bushings which are to be connected to external electrical cables. The fixed bushings are mounted in a wall of the electrical equipment and have their outer ends arranged to be connected to the cables.


One way of achieving this connection is by inserting an elbow terminator onto the bushing, the terminator being coupled to the cable. The elbow terminator, which typically comprises a tapered socket in which an electrical probe is mounted, is intended to be inserted onto the fixed bushing such that a tapered tongue of the bushing enters the socket. In so doing, a conductive tube disposed within the tongue makes electrical connection with the probe, thereby connecting the cable to the fixed bushing.


The elbow terminator is secured to the bushing by means of a latching ring disposed at an inner end of the socket. That latching ring snaps into an annular latching groove formed in the outer periphery of the leading end of the tongue when the elbow terminator is pushed onto the fixed bushing.


The elbow terminator is maneuvered onto the bushing by means of a hand-held shotgun stick which grabs a hook eye affixed to the elbow terminator. It may occur, however, that the tongue does not completely enter the socket, whereby the latching ring does not tightly grip the latching socket. That unlatched condition, which is potentially dangerous, is difficult for the operator to visually detect, especially since the operator will likely be standing remotely (e.g., at least three to five feet) from the terminator and bushing, for safety reasons.


It would therefore be desirable to facilitate the ability of the operator to detect an unlatched condition, especially when standing remotely of the terminator and bushing.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the combination of an electrical terminator and an electrical bushing component. The terminator includes a socket, and the bushing component includes a tongue receivable in the socket to electrically interconnect the terminator and bushing. The tongue and socket include a latching arrangement for positively latching the bushing component and terminator together when the tongue enters the socket to a prescribed depth. First and second visual indicators are disposed on outer peripheries of the bushing component and the terminator, respectively. The first and second visual indicators are arranged so that when the terminator is longitudinally inserted onto the bushing, the first and second indicators longitudinally approach one another sufficiently to at least become radially aligned with one another in order to provide a visual indication of positive latching. One of the first and second indicators is situated radially outside of the other of the indicator and is visible when the combination is viewed in a radially inward direction passing through the one indicator.


In another aspect of the invention, an indicator is defined by a color band formed on one of the terminator and bushing component (preferably on the bushing component) and is arranged to be radially covered by an indicator in the form of a covering portion of the other of the terminator and bushing component (preferably the terminator) when the tongue enters the socket to the prescribed depth, thereby providing a visual indication of positive latching.


The present invention also relates to an electrical bushing component which-possesses the color band, and also to a method of connecting an electrical terminator to an electrical bushing component which involves causing the color band to be covered when positive latching occurs.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment thereof in connection with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals designate like elements and in which:



FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of an elbow terminator and a bushing according to a first preferred embodiment of the invention, in a separated condition; and with the elbow terminator depicted in vertical section;



FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1 after the terminator has been inserted onto the bushing, a portion of the terminator being broken away;



FIG. 3 is a longitudinal sectional view taken through the bushing depicted in FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a plan view the terminator and bushing after they have been joined together;



FIG. 5 is a side elevational view of an elbow terminator and a bushing according to a second embodiment of the invention, in a separated condition, and with the elbow terminator partially broken away; and



FIG. 6 is a view similar to FIG. 5 of the second embodiment, after the terminator has been inserted onto the bushing.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Depicted in FIG. 1 is a loadbreak elbow terminator 10 and a bushing 12 adapted for connection therewith. The bushing can be of a type which is fixed to a stationary panel such that a tongue 22 is externally exposed. The elbow terminator includes a socket 14 formed in an electrical insulative material 16. The socket 14 includes a tapered portion 13 and merges into a cylindrical portion 15. Extending centrally along the socket is a probe 18 which carries an arc follower 20. The probe 18 is electrically connected to a cable 19.


The tongue 22 is configured to make an interference fit within the socket 14. Adjoining the tongue 22 is a cylindrical enlargement 24 configured to enter the cylindrical portion 15. The tongue 22 is hollow and includes a contact tube 26 (see FIG. 3) in which are disposed an arc interrupter 28 and a contact sleeve 30.


An end of the tongue 22 includes a latching groove 32. When the elbow terminator is pushed onto the bushing 12, the latching groove 32 receives, by snap fit, a latching ring 34 formed on a semiconducting insert 35 at an inner end of the socket 14. In that fashion, the bushing becomes secured to the elbow terminator.


As thus far described, the elbow terminator 10 and bushing 12 are conventional. The elbow terminator is maneuvered onto the bushing 12 by a conventional shotgun stick (not shown) which is manipulated manually by an operator. The shotgun stick includes a hook which grips a hook eye 38 carried by the elbow terminator. As explained earlier, it may occur that the tongue does not fully enter the socket, so that the latching ring 34 does not completely enter the latching groove 32. In that event, the bushing could become dislodged from the elbow terminator 10.


That problem is avoided by the present invention which involves the addition of a visual indicating arrangement which visually indicates when the tongue has entered the socket to a sufficient longitudinal depth to ensure latching. The visual indicating arrangement comprises cooperative visual indicators positioned on the bushing and elbow terminator such that the location of the visual indicators relative to one another in the longitudinal direction is readily visible to the operator. When the visual indicators attain a certain longitudinal relationship, it is ensured that positive latching has occurred. The edge 56 is visible when the bushing 12 is viewed in a radially inward direction D passing through the edge 56, as is evident from FIGS. 3 and 4.


The visual indicators comprise an indicator gauge 40 disposed exteriorly on the bushing 12, and an indicator ring 42 disposed exteriorly on the elbow terminator 10. The indicator ring 42 encircles the outer periphery of the elbow terminal at the entrance to the cylindrical portion 15 and forms a shoulder 44 which defines a mark in the form of an annular edge indicator or witness line 46.


The indicator gauge 40 includes an annular base portion 48 which encircles the outer periphery of the bushing at a location remote from the leading end thereof, i.e., remote from the latching groove 32 for the preferred version.


Projecting radially inwardly from an inner diameter of the base portion 48 is an annular ridge 50 configured to snap into a corresponding annular depression formed in the bushing. The semiconductive ground shield 52 could be modified to provide an appropriate surface in which the annular depression can be formed. Alternatively, the semiconductive ground shield 52 could be modified to include the spaced tabs 54 as an integral, i.e., one-piece, part.


Projecting longitudinally from the base 48 is a plurality of circumferentially spaced tabs 54. Each tab 54 includes a beveled free end 55 which defines a mark in the form of a circumferentially extending indicator edge 56 at a radially inner portion of that free end 55. The tabs 54 are of a prescribed length so that when the tongue 22 enters the socket 14 to a longitudinal depth sufficient to ensure positive latching by the latching ring 34 and latching groove 32, the indicator edges 46, 56 will either be radially aligned with one another (as shown in FIG. 4) or pass one another (i.e., the indicator edges 56 would be disposed to the left of the indicator edge 46 in FIG. 4). Thus, an operator can tell, merely by a visual inspection of the relative longitudinal locations of the edges 56, 46 whether positive latching has occurred.


The beveling of the free ends 55 of the tabs makes it easier for the operator to observe the indicator edges 56. By forming the tabs 54 on an annular base 48, the tabs can be conveniently mounted as a unit on the bushing. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that, depending upon the configuration of the outer periphery of the bushing, it may be possible to mold the bushing with tabs in lieu of providing a snap-on base 48 to which the tabs are mounted.


It may also be desirable to reverse the parts, i.e., to provide the gauge tabs 54 on the terminator and provide the indicator ring 42 on the bushing.


The indicator ring 42 could comprise an integral, one-piece portion of the terminator housing, or a separately attached piece.


It may be desirable to color the gauge tabs 54 differently from the indicator ring 42 in order to contrast the edges 46, 56 as much as possible and thereby, facilitate a proper observation by the operator. While in the disclosed preferred embodiment the indicator gauge 40 is disposed on a bushing, it will be appreciated that the indicator gauge could also be disposed on a bushing insert which is to be mounted to a bushing. Bushings (such as, for example, LBC devices, standoffs, and one-piece bushings) and bushing inserts can be generically referred to as “bushing components”.


A second embodiment of the invention, depicted in FIGS. 5 and 6, involves a loadbreak elbow terminator 100 and a bushing 112, wherein a visual indicator or mark 114 is provided on the bushing to cooperate with a visual indicator 116 provided on the terminator. The visual indicator 116 on the terminator is defined by an end portion or end flange of the terminator which surrounds the cylindrical portion 115 of the terminator socket into which a tongue 118 of the bushing is to be inserted.


The visual indicator 114 on the bushing is in the form of an annular color band of width W formed directly on the outer surface of the tongue 118 of the bushing. The color of the band 114 sharply contrasts with that of an adjacent portion 120 of the tongue 118 and also with that of the outer surface of the flange 116. Preferably, the band color is of a highly visible nature, such as a bright dayglow color like yellow, orange, lime green, etc., which is readily visible from at least a three to five foot distance. The color of an adjacent-portion of the tongue would be formed of a contrastingly dark color such as brown or gray.


The band 114 forms an edge indicator or witness line 122 at its junction with the adjacent portion 120 of the tongue. Likewise, the end flange 116 of the terminator defines an edge indicator 124.


The relationship between the edge indicators 122, 124 is such that when the terminator is longitudinally inserted onto the bushing sufficiently far for positive latching to occur in the manner described earlier herein, the edge indicators 122, 124 will have longitudinally approached one another sufficiently to be at least radially aligned with one another. That is, when positive latching has occurred, the color band 114 will, be completely disposed within the socket portion 115 and no longer visible.


That indication will be discernable by an operator who views the bushing in a radial direction radially with reference to the longitudinal axis thereof), from a distance of at least three to five feet. This enables the operator to maintain a safety distance while determining that latching has occurred.


The color band 114 can be applied in any suitable manner, preferably by applying a colored ink by means of a roller traveling around the outer periphery of the tongue. The band 114 is preferably circumferentially continuous, but it could be interrupted as well, since it is only required that the band be at least partly visible when there is no positive latching, and be invisible when there is positive latching.


The radial distance between the color band 114 and the longitudinal center axis of the tongue is larger than the radial distance between the axis and all portions of the outer circumferential surface of the tongue 118 situated between the color band and a free end 130 of the tongue, as is clear from FIG. 5. As a result, the color band can easily be viewed by an operator who is located to the left of the bushing 112 in FIG. 5 while applying the terminator. In particular, the outer circumferential surface of the tongue 118 includes a first portion 131 extending from the free end 130, and a second portion 132 disposed radially outwardly of the first portion and separated from the first portion by a radial wall 134 of the tongue which is oriented perpendicular to the center axis of the tongue. The color band 114 is disposed flush on the second portion.


Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modification, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An electrical equipment comprising: a terminator including a first latch structure, an arc follower, and a probe; anda bushing including a second latch structure, an arc interrupter, a contact sleeve, a tongue, a shoulder, and a color indicator,wherein: the arc follower, the probe, the arc interrupter, and the contact sleeve being arranged such that when the terminator and bushing are being mated, the arc follower and the arc interrupter contact each other before the probe and the contact sleeve contact each other;the first and second latch structures have complementary shapes;along an outer surface of the bushing, the color indicator lies between portions of the tongue and the shoulder and has a different color as compared to each of the tongue and the shoulder; andthe color indicator is arranged, such that when the first and second latching members are securely latched, a portion of the terminator covers the color indicator to provide a visual indication that the terminator and the elbow are securely latched.
  • 2. The electrical equipment of claim 1, wherein the terminator has a single principal conduction path.
  • 3. The electrical equipment of claim 1, wherein: the terminator is an elbow connector and further comprises a conductor, an insulator, and a semiconducting insert;the conductor includes a first portion and a second portion, wherein the first portion and second portion define an intersection; andthe semiconducting insert is disposed between the conductor and insulator at the intersection of the conductor.
  • 4. The electrical equipment of claim 3, wherein an angle formed at the intersection by the first portion and the second portion is substantially 90°.
  • 5. The electrical equipment of claim 1, wherein the bushing further comprises a semiconducting ground shield disposed along the shoulder.
  • 6. The electrical equipment of claim 1, wherein: the tongue has a first end and a second end opposite the first end; andthe second latch structure is disposed closer to the first end than the second end.
  • 7. The electrical equipment of claim 1, wherein the color indicator is in a form of a color ring that is yellow, orange, or green.
  • 8. The electrical equipment of claim 1, wherein the terminator further comprises an eye hook disposed along a line defined by a central axis of the probe.
  • 9. An electrical equipment comprising: a terminator including a first latch structure, a conductor, an insulator, and a semiconducting insert disposed between portions of the conductor and the insulator; anda bushing including a second latch structure, a tongue, a shoulder, and a color indicator,wherein: the first and second latch structures have complementary shapes;along an outer surface of the bushing, the color indicator lies between portions of the tongue and the shoulder and has a different color as compared to each of the tongue and the shoulder; andthe color indicator is arranged, such that when the first and second latching members are securely latched, a portion of the terminator covers the color indicator to provide a visual indication that the terminator and the elbow are securely latched.
  • 10. The electrical equipment of claim 9, wherein the terminator has a single principal conduction path.
  • 11. The electrical equipment of claim 9, wherein: the terminator is an elbow connector;the conductor includes a first portion and a second portion, wherein the first portion and second portion define an intersection; andthe semiconducting insert is disposed between the conductor and insulator at the intersection of the conductor.
  • 12. The electrical equipment of claim 11, wherein an angle formed at the intersection by the first portion and the second portion is substantially 90°.
  • 13. The electrical equipment of claim 11, wherein the terminator further comprises a probe and an eye hook disposed along a line defined by a central axis of the probe.
  • 14. The electrical equipment of claim 9, wherein the bushing further comprises a semiconducting ground shield disposed along the shoulder.
  • 15. The electrical equipment of claim 9, wherein the color indicator is in a form of a color ring that is yellow, orange, or green.
  • 16. An electrical equipment comprising: a terminator including a first latch structure;a bushing including a second latch structure, a tongue, a shoulder, a ground shield, and a color indicator,wherein: the first and second latch structures have complementary shapes;the ground shield is disposed along the shoulder;along an outer surface of the bushing, the color indicator lies between portions of the tongue and the shoulder and has a different color as compared to each of the tongue and shoulder; andthe color indicator is arranged, such that when the first and second latching members are securely latched, a portion of the terminator covers the color indicator to provide a visual indication that the terminator and the elbow are securely latched.
  • 17. The electrical equipment of claim 16, wherein: the terminator is an elbow connector and further comprises a conductor, an insulator, and a semiconducting insert;the conductor includes a first portion and a second portion, wherein the first portion and second portion define an intersection; andthe semiconducting insert is disposed between the conductor and insulator at the intersection of the first and second portions of the conductor.
  • 18. The electrical equipment of claim 17, wherein the terminator further comprises a probe and an eye hook disposed along a line defined by a central axis of the probe.
  • 19. The electrical equipment of claim 16, wherein: the tongue has a first end and a second end opposite the first end; andthe second latch structure is disposed closer to the first end than the second end.
  • 20. The electrical equipment of claim 16, wherein the color indicator is in a form of a color ring that is yellow, orange, or green.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/175,491, filed Jan. 10, 2006, now allowed: which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/412,683, filed Apr. 14, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,984,791; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/193,963, filed Jul. 22, 2002, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/821,760, filed Mar. 20, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,103; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/262,460, filed Jun. 20, 1994, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/083,335, filed Mar. 10, 1993, now abandoned, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (65)
Number Name Date Kind
1752865 Thorpe Nov 1927 A
1783062 Trencham Nov 1930 A
1997081 Reynolds Apr 1935 A
2688498 Wilson Oct 1951 A
2605389 Kimball Jul 1952 A
2667532 Ewer Jan 1954 A
2914344 Anthes Apr 1955 A
2892991 Beebee Jun 1959 A
3392363 Geis, Jr. et al. Jul 1968 A
3474386 Link Oct 1969 A
3509518 Phillips Apr 1970 A
3513425 Arndt May 1970 A
3652975 Keto Mar 1972 A
3663928 Keto et al. May 1972 A
3670287 Keto Jun 1972 A
3678432 Boliver Jul 1972 A
3720904 De Sio Mar 1973 A
3727951 Shire Apr 1973 A
3826860 De Sio et al. Jul 1974 A
3835439 Yonkers Sep 1974 A
3860322 Sankey et al. Jan 1975 A
3915534 Yonkers Oct 1975 A
3953099 Wilson Apr 1976 A
3955874 Boliver May 1976 A
3957332 Lambert, III May 1976 A
3960433 Boliver Jun 1976 A
4067636 Boliver et al. Jan 1978 A
4113339 Eley Sep 1978 A
4123131 Pearce, Jr. et al. Oct 1978 A
4210381 Borgstrom Jul 1980 A
4223179 Lusk et al. Sep 1980 A
4260214 Dorn Apr 1981 A
H280 Thingpen Jun 1987 H
4722694 Makal et al. Feb 1988 A
4793637 Laipply Dec 1988 A
4822291 Cunningham Apr 1989 A
4863392 Borgstrom et al. Sep 1989 A
4867687 Williams et al. Sep 1989 A
4911655 Pinyan Mar 1990 A
4972049 Muench Nov 1990 A
5002315 Bartholomew Mar 1991 A
5114357 Luzzi May 1992 A
5130495 Thompson Jul 1992 A
5213517 Kerek et al. May 1993 A
5221220 Roscizewski Jun 1993 A
5230640 Tardif et al. Jul 1993 A
5248263 Sakurai et al. Sep 1993 A
5266041 De Luca Nov 1993 A
5356304 Colleran Oct 1994 A
5358420 Cairns et al. Oct 1994 A
5393240 Makal et al. Feb 1995 A
5433622 Galambos Jul 1995 A
5492487 Cairns et al. Feb 1996 A
5641306 Stepniak Jun 1997 A
5641310 Tiberio, Jr. Jun 1997 A
5655921 Makal et al. Aug 1997 A
5795180 Siebens Aug 1998 A
5816835 Meszaros Oct 1998 A
5857862 Muench et al. Jan 1999 A
5957712 Stepniak Sep 1999 A
6168447 Stepniak et al. Jan 2001 B1
6213799 Jazowski et al. Apr 2001 B1
6504103 Meyer et al. Jan 2003 B1
6585531 Stepniak et al. Jul 2003 B1
6984791 Meyer et al. Jan 2006 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2254493 Oct 1992 GB
62-198677 Dec 1987 JP
S6393081 Jun 1988 JP
1-175181 Jul 1989 JP
H-3-88279 Sep 1991 JP
H-4-54164 May 1992 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (140)
Entry
Non Final Office Action dated May 6, 1994 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/038,335.
Notice of Abandonment dated Jan. 9, 1995 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/038,335.
Notice of Abandonment dated Apr. 11, 1997 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460.
Advisory Action dated Mar. 6, 1997 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 1996 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460.
Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 17, 1996 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460.
Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 1995 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/262,460.
Notice of Abandonment dated May 30, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 17, 2001 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 1997 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 1998 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Notice of Abandonment dated Jun. 2, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/198,963.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 14, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/198,963.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 13, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,683.
Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,683.
Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,683.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 21, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 18, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 26, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Non Final Office Action dated May 14, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333.
Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333.
Examiner's Answer dated Sep. 24, 1998 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Decision on Petition dated Sep. 26, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Issue Notification dated Jul. 25, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Notice of Withdrawal from Issue dated Aug. 9, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Response to Amendment under Rule 312 dated Nov. 13, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/275,491.
Decision on Appeal dated Aug. 22, 2001 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/821,760.
Examiner's Answer dated Dec. 24, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,386.
Declaration of Larry Siebens, 2nd Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, 4 pgs., Dec. 21, 2007.
Thomas & Betts Corp. et al v. Hubbell Inc. et al., Complaint filed Apr. 11, 2005.
RTE Corporation—“RTE Transformer Components,” Mar. 30, 1978.
Amerace Corporation Elastimold Division “New Dimension in Loadbreak,” Feb. 1, 1974, pp. 1-8.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2009 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386, 2009.
Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2008 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386, 2008.
Action Closing Prosecution dated Nov. 1, 2007 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 95/000,209, 2007.
Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2007 for U.S. Re-Examination No. 95/000,209, 2007.
Examiner's Answers dated Mar. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,209, 2009.
“Qualitative Evaluation of 15kV Loadbreak Designs,” R.J. Stanger, Elastimold Division, Amerace Corporation, Aug. 16, 1973.
“RTE Safe Break Terminator—Electrical Application and Operating Instruction,” Manual 1067, RTE Corporation, 1967.
Request for Ex Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,504,103, U.S. Appl. 90/008,386; Dec. 21, 2006, pp. 1-55, 2006.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,984,791, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,209 Dec. 21, 2006, 130 pgs, 2006.
Exhibits 1-17 Filed With the Requests for Reexaminations U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,386 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,209, Dec. 21, 2006.
Ex Parte Reexamination Decision on Petition, Reexamination Control No. 90/008,386, Patent No. 6,504,103, mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 5 pages.
Ex Parte Reexamination Decision on Request for Rehearing, Appeal 2011-008241, Reexamination Control No. 90/008,386, Patent No. 6,504,103, mailed Jul. 25, 2012, 26 pages.
Inter Parte Reexamination Decision on Petition, Reexamination Control No. 95/000,209, Patent No. 6,984,791, mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 5 pages.
Inter Parte Reexamination Decision on Request for Rehearing, Appeal 2011-008268, Reexamination Control No. 95/000,209, Patent No. 6,984,791, mailed Jul. 25, 2012, 26 pages.
Steve Larson, “3.5kV Elbow Backoff & Loadbreak Problems”, Pacific Power Internal Correspondence, Aug. 24, 1987, 17 pages.
Roger Provencal, “35kV LB Switching Working Conference” Elastimold Division, Amerace Corporation, Aug. 8, 1998, 1 page.
Thomas Champion, “An Overview of Failure Analysis”, Sep. 17, 1996, pp. 1-17.
Frank Stepniak, “Effects of Partial Vacuum on 35kV Seperable Connector Switching Performance”, Sep. 16, 1996, 8 pages.
Steve Larson, “Elastimold 35kV Elbow/Bushing Interface Failures”, Pacific Power Internal Correspondence, Jan. 29, 1988, 2 pages.
“Cooper Posi-Break Elbow and Cap”, Cooper Power Systems, 1988.
“Get Smart, A Current Issues Newsletter for the Utility Products Salesforce”, Egal Industries, Inc.—Utility Group, Jun. 1994, 4 pages.
John Makal, “ICC Task Force 10-50, Meeting Minutes Nov. 5, 1991”, Apr. 22, 1992, 1 page.
“Joy Break Safe Bushing Plug 15kV, 200 amp, Operation and Warranty,” Joy Manufacturing Company, Dec. 1971, 3 pages.
“Loadbreak Apparatus Connectors,” Cooper Power Systems, 200 A 25kV Class Loadbreak Bushing Insert, Jan. 1997, 7 pgs.
“200 A 25 kV Class Cooper POSI-BREAK Loadbreak Elbow Connector,” Cooper Power Systems, Jan. 1998, 6 pages.
J.M. Makal, “Low Current Switching Phenomena,” Sep. 1996, Cooper Power Systems, 23 paggs.
“Minutes of the 100th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Nov. 3-6, 1996, 43 pgs.
“Minutes of the 101st Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 20-23, 1997, 5 pgs.
“Minutes of the 102nd Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Nov. 2-5, 1997, 52 pgs.
“Minutes of the 84th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 26-23, 1989, 7 pages.
“Minutes of the 86th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 29-May 2, 1990, 6 pages.
“Minutes of the 90th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 26-29, 1992.
“RTE Transformer Components—8.3 V o—GND Air SBT Bushing” RTE Corporation, Section 1110, Jan. 3, 1978, 3 pgs.
“Minutes of the 92nd Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Nov. 8-11, 1992, 4 pages.
“Minutes of the 95th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, May 22-25, 1994, 6 pages.
“Minutes of the 97th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 9-12, 1995, 3 pages.
“Minutes of the 99th Meeting,” IEEE Power Engineering Society—Insulated conductors Committee, IEEE, Apr. 14-17, 1996, 5 pages.
“Notice—Elastimold Product Bulletin,” PB: 400-10-91, Oct. 21, 1991, 1 page.
Gail Shaw, “Operation of 35kV Underground Systems,” Pacific Power & Light Company, Jun. 27, 1984, 10 pages.
Settlement and License Agreement—Cooper Technologies Company and Hubbell Incorporation, Dec. 2006, 20 pgs.
Frank Stepniak, “Resolution of the Flashover Problem,” Elastimold Correspondence, Feb. 27, 1998, F. Stepniak, 18 pages.
Fax communication from John Makal Jul. 15, 1991, 9 pgs.
“Safe-T-Ring Collar—An Anti-Vacuum Device,” 9U02RING, Advertisement; Jan. 2000, Hubbell Power Systems Inc., 3 pgs.
“Seperable Insulated Connector Systems for Power Distribution Systems Above 600V” American National Standard [ANSI] IEEE Standard, Jun. 25, 1985,29 pages.
Plaintiff's Markman Claim Construction Brief, including Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9, filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Dec. 17, 2007, 125 pgs.
Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Certain Documents are Not Printed Publications Under 35 U.S.C. §102 filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 26 pg.
Amended Agreed Protective Order executed by Charles Everingham IV, U.S. Magistrate Judge in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Nov. 20, 2007, 15 pgs.
Declaration of Frank Muench with Exhibit A, Submitted under 37 CFR 1.131, Mar. 12, 2007, 10 pages.
Declaration of Frank Muench with Exhibit A, Submitted under 37 CFR 1.131, Jun. 11, 2008, 70 pages.
Declaration of Elizabeth Ducote with Exhibits A-D (A, B, C are Redacted), Nov. 30, 2007, 38 pages.
Declaration of Henry Hecker with Exhibits A-D, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 6, 2007, 44 pages.
Declaration of Craig Wahlgren with Exhibits A-M, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 12, 2007, 45 pages.
Declaration of Andrew Meyer with Exhibit A, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 12, 2007, 6 pages.
Declaration of Andrew Meyer with Exhibits A-B, Submitted under 37 CFR 1.131, Jul. 12, 2007, 35 pages.
Declaration of John Makal, Submitted by Patent Owner in 95/000,209 Reexam, Jul. 12, 2007, 47 pages.
Declaration of Larry Siebens with Exhibit A, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 13, 2007, 12 pages.
Declaration of Frank Stepniak with Exhibits A-D, 1st Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Dec. 18, 2006, 39 pages.
Declaration of Frank Stepniak with Exhibits A-G (E Redacted), 2nd Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 8, 2007, 86 pages.
Declaration of Frank Stepniak with Exhibits A-F (F Redacted), 3rd Declaration, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Dec. 21, 2007, 53 pgs.
Declaration of William A. Thue with Exhibit A, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 3, 2007, 15 pages.
Declaration of William A. Thue in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 28, 2008, 128 pages.
Declaration of Kevin W. Jakel, Jul. 28, 2008, 66 pages.
Declaration of Steve Larson with Exhibit A-B, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 9, 2007, 24 pages.
Declaration of Steve Larson with Exhibit A in Request for Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,504,103B1, Nov. 30, 2006, 20 pgs.
Declaration of Roger Provencal with Exhibit A-B, Submitted by Third Party Requester in 95/000,209 Reexam, Aug. 9, 2007, 11 pages.
Alleged drawings from 1986, 2 pgs. (TB 0073233-0073234).
Alleged drawings from 1987, 10 pgs. (TB 0073239-0073248).
Deposition of John Makel dated Feb. 12, 2008, with Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 25, 292 pgs.
Memorandum from D.E. Crotty to D.W. Britton (TB 0156967-0156971) dated Apr. 10, 1986, 4 pgs.
Deposition of Craig Wahlgren dated Feb. 13, 2008, 45 pgs.
Second Supplemental Reply to Office Action filed Mar. 4, 2009 in U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386, 4 pages.
Request for Reconsideration of Entry of Supplemental Replies filed Apr. 8, 2009 in U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386 4 pages.
Petition to Enter Supplemental Reply filed Apr. 7, 2009 in U.S. Re-Examination No. 90/008,386 6 pages.
Cooper Technologies Company v. Hubbell, Inc., Complaint filed in Civil Docket No. 06-cv-0520, Apr. 26, 2006, 23 pgs.
Defendant's Claim Construction Brief and Opposition to Plaintiff's Claim Construction Brief filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 11, 2008, 37 pages.
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 8, 2008, 9:00 a.m., pp. 1-92, inc. glossary, pp. 1-13.
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 8, 2008, 1:30 p.m., pp. 1-166, inc. glossary, pp. 1-23.
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 9, 2008, 8:30 a.m., pp. 1-160, inc. glossary, pp. 1-19.
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 9, 2008, 1:15 p.m., pp. 1-200, inc. glossary, pp. 1-24.
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 10, 2008, 8:30 a.m., pp. 1-156, inc. glossary, pp. 1-19.
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 10, 2008, 1:15 p.m., pp. 1-180, inc. glossary, pp. 1-23.
Transcript of Trial, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Sep. 11, 2008, 8:30 a.m., pp. 1-173, inc. glossary, pp. 1-23.
Verdict Form, Cooper Technologies Company v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, Civil Docket No. 2:06-cv-242, 9 pages, Sep. 11, 2008.
Memorandum Opinion and Order (claim construction) filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Feb. 15, 2008, 14 pgs.
Plaintiff's Reply Markman Claim Construction Brief and Opposition to Defendants' Claim Construction Brief filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 22, 2008, 20 pgs.
Claim Construction Chart—Disputed and Agreed Terms Pursuant to P.R. 4-5 (d)(1) filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 18, 2008, 19 pgs.
Deposition of Frank Muench, Mar. 26, 2008, pp. 1-292; Index pp. 1-33.
“Minutes/Meeting Notice on Application Guide for Separable Connectors” IEEE Distribution Subcommittee, Feb. 1994, 12 pages.
Order Granting Motion to Dismiss in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 23, 2009, 1 page.
Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jan. 22, 2009, 4 pgs.
Defendant's Sur-Reply; Supporting Opposition to Cooper' Motion for Partial Summary Judgement; Certain Documents under USC 102 in Civil Dkt No. 2:06-CV-242, Aug. 20, 2008, 15 pgs.
Affidavit (James Beebe Declaration) in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgement; including Exhibits 1-3 in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 19 pages.
Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Aug. 8, 2008, 18 pgs.
Defendant's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Aug. 8, 2008, 40 pgs.
Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 28, 2008, 190 pgs.
Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Jul. 28, 2008, 1 pg.
Exhibits B-H in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Due to Anticipation and Obviousness filed in Civil Dkt No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 65 pages.
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Due to Anticipation and Obviousness filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 9, 2008, 50 pages.
Affidavit of Henry Hecker in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in Civil Docket No. 2:06-CV-242, Jul. 7, 2008, 4 pgs.
Notice of Abandonment dated Dec. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,333.
Letter from Kevin Jakel to David H. Tannenbaum; Response to Request for Sworn Testimony from Steve Larson, Frank Stepniak, and Roger Provencal; Jun. 25, 2007, 3 pages.
“Elastimold, New Dimension in Loadbreak,” Section No. 410-50, Elastimold Div Amerace Corporation 1974.
Letter from David H. Tannenbaum to Kevin Jakel; Request for Sworn Testimony from Steve Larson, Frank Stepniak, and Roger Provencal; Jun. 13, 2007, 2 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100068907 A1 Mar 2010 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 11275491 Jan 2006 US
Child 12623802 US
Parent 10198963 Jul 2002 US
Child 10412683 US
Parent 08262460 Jun 1994 US
Child 08821760 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 10412683 Apr 2003 US
Child 11275491 US
Parent 08821760 Mar 1997 US
Child 10198963 US
Parent 08038335 Mar 1993 US
Child 08262460 US