The present invention is directed to a folder system and method of making folders with index tabs.
File folders, hanging file folders and other paper storage systems are of great utility in an office setting. The most common storage system, the common manila folder, for example are widespread and relatively inexpensive, and have convenient tabs suitable for writing. Such folders may be available in hanging or non-hanging versions. There are many other types as well, but of particular interest is their ability to display indicia on a tab by marking/applying data to a region of the folder which is visible when the folder is closed (i.e. the leaves are generally parallel with documents therebetween).
In addition, typically tabbing systems are on the top or side of the file folder. The amount of data which can be displayed is a function of the label size, but there are practical limitations on label size. There are many reasons for wanting to have the maximum writing space available on a file. Obviously the more that is written, the more the user will know about the contents. There are other reasons. Space may be needed for bar coding or color coding. Bar coding usually requires at least 3-5 mm of height for a successful scan. That leaves perhaps 15-20 mm left for human readable indicia. If bar and color coding are used, there may be little or no space left for words and numbers.
On the other hand, it is not practical to increase the overall height of the file folder because the file drawers and other containers built for folders is already standardized and making the tabs taller will simply not be acceptable to users who require backward compatibility to existing systems.
In the prior art, Jonas U.S. Pat. No. 2,037,579, proposes a solution which exposes more of the tab surface by cutting a notch into the front panel, but that solution still leaves the user with a very limited amount of visible area when folders are stacked against each other, such as in a file cabinet, because the notched portion (34 in Jonas) is occluded when in a file drawer.
The Jonas reference goes back to 1936, which illustrates that much time has passed without a substantial improvement despite the long felt need for improvement. The problem has been that there seemed no way to increase the label size without exceeding the space limits of standard file cabinets.
So a solution needs to be found to provide a simple way to make tabs larger without exceeding existing norms for folder file cabinets or the like. There are other issues relevant to the solution of the present invention and they are detailed below.
Reference should be had to the claims for the scope of invention.
The invention includes a file folder, with increased writable tab surface having a back panel surface having a top edge including a tab, a front panel surface overlying at least a portion of the back panel, said front panel having a cut out portion adjacent said tab and being at least as large as the tab, so that said tab has a portion of its writable surface visible thru the cut out portion of said front panel.
The present invention also includes a method of manufacturing a file folder to have enhanced visual indicia tab space without increasing the overall folder size including providing a folder blank of predetermined dimensions having a front and back panel, the back panel including a tab extension portion extending from an edge of, the back panel said tab having a predetermined height and the front panel likewise having a predetermined height; the front panel overlying the back panel when the folder is in use thereby covering most of the back panel; and reducing the coverage of the back panel at that portion of the back panel which is adjacent to the tab extension by cutting a portion of the front panel away thereby exposing more of said tab.
A further aspect of the invention is a method for making a file folder to have enhanced visual indicia tab with a writable visible tab space larger taller than a predetermined industry standard tab height without increasing the overall folder height by providing a folder blank of predetermined dimensions having a front and back panel, the back panel including a tab extension extending upwardly from an edge of the folder generally equal to a predetermined industry standard tab height above the front panel height, the front panel overlying the back panel when the folder is folded thereby covering most of the back panel, and deleting a portion of the front panel which would lie adjacent to the tab extension on the back panel, said deletion creating a recess in the front panel roughly equal to the predetermined standard tab height; so that the exposed portion of the tab extension is roughly equal to twice the predetermined industry standard tab height allowing additional indicia to be written on said exposed portion.
The present invention has many facets and only a few are set forth in this summary. Reference should be had to the detailed description and the claims for a full definition of the invention.
The present invention is directed to a variety of folder-like products which have tabs, most prominently, a tabbed folder (hanging, plain or any other formulation of a pair of substantially planar sidewalls, with one sidewall taller than the other thereby forming a tab which may receive indicia). The tabs may be 2 or 3 dimensional. The term folder is intended to encompass a range of other office requisites, such as binders, folios, clip boards, pockets and similar items, which may have tabs capable of receiving indicia (markings, labels, etc.)
For the sake of brevity, the embodiments in the figures will be discussed simultaneously and the same reference numerals will be used whenever the elements are the same or similar. More information about folders can be learned from the commonly owned patent application Ser. No. 60/835,373 filed on 3 Aug. 2006 titled INTEGRATED TAB HANGING FILE SYSTEM which is incorporated herein by reference.
Folder 10 has front substantially planar face 12 and a rear face 14. In this case they are joined at the bottom (not shown) though they may also be joined at either side.
The tab 16 has, in this case a label affixed thereon as a way to display the indicia.
Notice that the visibility of the tab depends on height 30 which is the height of the tab, but more importantly the height of the tab is limited by height 32 which is the depth to which the front face 12 is cut to expose the tab face 16. The full height of the folder from the top of the tab to the bottom of the folder (not visible) is identified schematically by numeral 40. It is a length equal to or less than the allowed height for by standardized file cabinets. This height 40 cannot be changed without creating problems with existing standards. Thus to solve the long felt problem of inadequate labeling space on the tabs, another solution was needed.
Folder 10a has front substantially planar face 12a and a rear face 14a. In this case they are joined at the bottom (not shown) though they may also be joined at either side.
The tab 16a has, in this case a label affixed thereon as a way to display the indicia.
Notice that the visibility of the tab is enhanced by the deep cut illustrated by height 30a which is the height of the tab, but more importantly the height of the tab is limited by height 32a which is the depth to which the front face 12a is cut to expose the tab face 16a.
The height 40a represents the top to bottom height of file folder 10a. This height is standardized in the commerce in different countries, taking into account the typical height of file cabinets and other storage systems. Thus, in resolving the problem of providing greater visible indicia placement space on the tab, it is not possible to increase the height of the tab 16a or overall height 40a without causing problems with storage in standardized containers. The available visible indicia (labeling) space is defined as the distance from the top of the tab (folder) to the point at which the front face (12a) ends and exposes the tab. In
To achieve the necessary increase in visible indicia space, the present invention creates a void/notch/recess/cut away portion in the top edge 38a of panel 12a. The reduction in the front panel 12a height is indicated by gap 36a so that top edge 44a and 38a are at different levels, thereby exposing a greater portion of the back panel 14a, and hence the visual indicia space of the back panel 14a is increased without violating the rule against increasing the overall height 40a. Another embodiment (not shown) is where gap 34a (between the top edge of the back panel not at the tab), is equal to the top edge of the front pane, not at the cut out, so that gap 34a is substantially zero. The preferred construction has edge 35a being lowered to what is currently indicated as edge 38a. This provides maximum visibility of the tabs behind 22a and 21a in
To further increase the utility of the folder, it may also be desirable to cut down the top edge 38a of front face 12a so that the differential in heights 36 and 36a are keep relatively the same. Therefore, in the preferred embodiment, the front panel 12a, would have two heights 52a and 50a (below the tab location, whether left, right or center placed) with a differential between the two of 36a, which may correspond generally to the same differential (36a) as found in the prior art folder 10, face 12. This will give the improved folder the appearance of the prior art folder.
It is also desirable to increase the cut down of the back panel 14a, to insure that other such enlarged tab files (21a, 22a) can be seen from behind folder 10a. This cut down as measured from the top of tab 16a to the top of front face 12a, but not at the portion having tab 16a is indicated as distance 60a. Relative to a prior art folder 10, the cut down is of the same general proportion such that tabs behind folder 10a are visible. Therefore, the amount of cut down of face 12a relative to the maximum height 40a (indicated as 60a) is sufficient that the enlarged tab behind the folder, but not overlapping will be fully visible with respect to their marking indicia area. So if distance 40a is denoted as X, and distance 36a is denoted as Y, then the total visible tab area is 32a+36a, denoted as Z.
In more general terms, one embodiment of the present invention is achieved by making two cuts deeper than traditionally found in the prior art. This has produced a result by unexpected means (the expected means of making tabs larger is to make them taller, but this violates height restrictions of file cabinets).
In the present invention, where the overall height of the folder is a predetermined X, and the normal tab window (the part of the tab which is visible thru when the front face is overlying) is Y, the improvement is to reduce the height of the front face adjacent to the tab to more than Y, such as Z. In
A method of achieving the invention of creating a oversized tab without increasing overall file height, therefore includes, a) providing a front and back panel joined to form a folder; b) cutting a portion of the front panel away corresponding to the desired height of the visible writing/labeling surface desired. In
In this embodiment however, it is necessary to modify the front support rod 80 to include a visual aperture 82 created by offsetting the path of rod 80 to provide the necessary visible indicia space. This “cut down” or “cut out” is accomplished by modifying the path of bar 80 as shown in
The support bar/rod has an offset portion at the recessed portion formed of two jogs and a linear section and an offset section and the rod is covered by the material which forms the front panel. The material closely follows path of the jog in the rod, thereby allowing for visibility of the back panel tab. Specifically, the material is folded/formed directly over/around the support rod so that closely tracks the path of the support rod and does not substantially occlude the view of the tab regardless of its location on the back panel. In short, the material does not substantially increase the height of the top edge of the front panel beyond the height of the rod.
It is not essential that the support element be a rod or bar in either the front or back panel. It may also be a plate or other rigidified section of the panel 12b so long as it is cut down to create the visible indicia space for the label 16b (which in
In fact,
A method of making a folder with increased visual indicia tab space is also disclosed according to the disclosure above. In a further embodiment, the folder is made from a blank (a larger sheet of material which is usually die cut to specification). The blank is cut to have the following characteristic. The tab on the back panel is exposed by increasing the depth to which the upper edge of the front panel is cut down to expose the back panel. In the region of the tab on the back panel, the front panel cut is made deeper to expose more of the tab. In particular, the cut (usually by a die) is made roughly as deep into the front panel to create a void sufficient to allow the tab section of the back panel to be folded over into the void and not overlap the front panel. The fold line of the tab could be the top edge (38a) of the folder. Therefore distance 33a in
This construction method will result in the tab 16a being foldable onto the back panel without engaging the front panel. Of course the tab is not intended to be folded in normal use, but this geometry is one way to define the depth of the cut on the front panel, though this invention is not limited to such geometric analysis.
Another method involves reducing or sinking the front back panel top edge 35a (not at the tabbed area) and 38a so that it is cut down roughly to expose the maximum amount of tab. This provides maximum viewability of the tabs behind 21a and 22a. The limitation is that if the cut down is too low, the papers stored in the folder will be visible or exposed. The point at which papers placed in folder would interfere/block viewing of a portion of the tab, the cut is, for practical purposes, too deep. In the preferred method, the “cut down” is a method of forming rather referring only to cutting material away. In the case of a non fiber material (such as plastics) the exact shape can be formed or die cut, so the cut down refers to the depth of exposure, not how it is achieved. Prior art methods, such as Jonas mentioned above, could not provide for a folder system where different folders had tabs located in different positions (known as multiple “cut” folders). The present invention recognizes the importance of a cut down region across the face of the front panel (at least where all tabs might be located) rather than a cut down only in front of the tab of interest.
A further method for making a file folder to have enhanced visual indicia tab with a writable visible tab space larger taller than a predetermined industry standard tab height without increasing the overall folder height. The industry standard tab height 30 in the USA is roughly one-half inch or 12.5 mm. It is not the intention of the inventor to limit the invention to that size or its approximation. The method provides for a folder blank of predetermined dimensions having a front and back panel, the back panel including a tab extension extending upwardly from an edge of the folder generally equal to a predetermined industry standard tab height above the front panel height, the front panel overlying the back panel when the folder is folded thereby covering most of the back panel, and deleting a portion of the front panel which would lie adjacent to the tab extension on the back panel, said deletion creating a recess in the front panel roughly equal to the predetermined standard tab height; so that the exposed portion of the tab extension is roughly equal to twice the predetermined industry standard tab height allowing additional indicia to be written on said exposed portion. The importance is that by deleting (cutting away, forming, molding, etc) the front panel to have a void/recession area which extends downwardly away from and adjacent to the tab extension on the back panel, thereby exposes the tab extension (16a) to allow increased writable area without increasing the overall height of the folder 40a. The writable portion would therefore be roughly double a predetermined amount and/or industry standard, one half of the height coming from the upward tab extension 30, and the remainder from the downward deletion 34a+36a in the front panel. The result is a folder product with vastly superior usefulness to the customer who often needs a larger writable area on the tab but is constrained by the height limitations of standard file drawers.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/467,380 filed 9 May 2012 which is a Continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/497,243 filed 2 Jul. 2009, now abandoned, which is a Continuation In Part of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/965,896 filed 28 Dec. 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,813, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/877,534 filed 28 Dec. 2006, which hereby is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
815214 | Rand | Mar 1906 | A |
1206442 | Johnson | Nov 1916 | A |
1221884 | Martin | Apr 1917 | A |
1490344 | Poulin | Apr 1924 | A |
1803823 | Wittlenmyer | May 1931 | A |
1922213 | Middleton | Aug 1933 | A |
2037579 | Jonas | Apr 1936 | A |
2248027 | Maass | Jul 1941 | A |
2318077 | Jonas | May 1943 | A |
2345793 | Chapel | Apr 1944 | A |
2484453 | Halverson | Oct 1949 | A |
2874699 | Dunleavy | Feb 1959 | A |
3249111 | Vincens | May 1966 | A |
3288144 | Hyams | Nov 1966 | A |
4477013 | Herrin | Oct 1984 | A |
4523775 | Reist | Jun 1985 | A |
D298265 | Snider et al. | Oct 1988 | S |
4923111 | Down | May 1990 | A |
4932683 | Perazza | Jun 1990 | A |
D337784 | Wyant | Jul 1993 | S |
5722692 | Abramov | Mar 1998 | A |
6039473 | Bond | Mar 2000 | A |
6138900 | Zeiler | Oct 2000 | A |
D438904 | Reynolds | Mar 2001 | S |
6453589 | Schwartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6926158 | Brown | Aug 2005 | B1 |
D530743 | Ong | Oct 2006 | S |
7210659 | Lawson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
D622320 | DeCarlo et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7900813 | Dodson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8746539 | Dodson | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20050000839 | Densley | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060278686 | Rittmann | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080197176 | DeCarlo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140283659 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60877534 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13467380 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14299720 | US | |
Parent | 12497243 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13467380 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11965896 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 12497243 | US |