The present application is generally related to processing measurement data of VNAs to compensate for the transmission line delay and attenuation.
Vector network analyzers (VNAs) are devices that are used to determine the radio frequency (RF) characteristics of various devices under test (DUTs). For a number of VNA operations, the pertinent performance measurements depend upon both the magnitude and phase of the signals applied to and received at each port. However, the delay and attenuation to a DUT may vary on a per port basis. For example, fixture-based test set-ups and “on wafer” set-ups may cause such differences to occur. Specifically, transmission line characteristics can significantly effect the phase and amplitude measurements of a DUT.
Most commercially available VNAs include some functionality to address transmission line effects. An example of such functionality is referred to as “port extensions” that adjust the phase and/or amplitude of measurement data according to an electrical length parameter. Known port extension functionality assumes that a linear relationship exists between the electrical length of a transmission line to the DUT and the delay. However, many transmission lines are dispersive and, hence, their phase characteristics are not linear with respect to frequency. The use of a linear model to compensate for transmission line characteristics can result in significant inaccuracies for higher frequency applications. Another example of such functionality is referred to as “adapter removal” that attempts to remove the magnitude and phase response of an adapter.
Some representative embodiments are directed to compensating for transmission line effects in VNA measurement data. In some representative embodiments, a suitable module of an VNA calculates loss and/or phase response associated with ports of the VNA and a device under test (DUT). In one embodiment, the module employs functions to calculate transmission line phase response and loss by using respective sums of multiple transmission line models. The multiple models preferably include a coaxial transmission line model, a rectangular waveguide transmission line model, and a microstrip transmission line model. Additionally, the functions are functions of controllable variables that are related to transmission line lengths associated with each of the transmission models.
The processing by the module of the VNA may occur in different contexts. For example, when VNA calibration occurs, parameters defining the transmission line characteristics of a calibration standard may be provided to the module. When calibration measurements are made using the standard, the correction of the measurement data may occur by processing of the module. The greater accuracy in the calibration data enables a greater degree of accuracy in calculating the systematic error terms of the VNA. In another mode of operation, when measurements of a device of interest occurs, the processing of the module may occur to support automatic port extension functionality to enable transmission line effects in measurement data to be addressed in real-time. Also, when adapter removal calibration is appropriate, the transmission phase of the adapter may be computed more accurately to achieve a valid solution.
In general, the phase response of a transmission line can be modeled as follows:
where L=length, c=speed of light in a vacuum, and εref=effective relative dielectric constant. Let δ≡electrical delay=L/c. Then, θ=2πƒ√{square root over (εref)}δ+θ0
The effective relative dielectric constant εref of the transmission media is typically a frequency dependent term and modeled as a function of frequency (G(f)). The phase response of a transmission line can then be modeled by:
θ=2πƒ√{square root over (G(ƒ))}δ+θ0 (2)
The general equation of transmission line loss is given by:
IL≡transmission loss=K e−αl (3)
where α=propagation loss constant, l=length of transmission line. Taking the natural log, further derivations may be made as follows:
In(IL)=−αl+K0
IF α≅A*F(f)
Then In(IL)=−A*F(f)*l+K0 (4)
Thus, transmission lines can be characterized by two respective functions (G(f) and F(f)) that define their phase response and loss characteristics.
In some embodiments, the following equations are used to model a low loss single metal coaxial transmission line:
Gc(ƒ)=εr; Fc(ƒ)=K√{square root over (ƒ)} (5)
In some embodiments, the following equations are used to model a low loss rectangular waveguide:
In some embodiments, the following equations are used to model a microstrip transmission line:
where εre=F(w, h, t); fp=H(w, h, t, f);
w=width of trace; t=thickness of trace; h=height of trace from ground Fms(ƒ)=αc+αd
In some embodiments, a module of a VNA employs functions to calculate transmission line delay and loss by using respective sums of the preceding transmission line phase and loss models. In some embodiments, the functions are given by:
G(ƒ)=δcG′c(ƒ)+δwgG′wg(ƒ)+δmsG′ms(ƒ)+ . . . +G0
F(ƒ)=ρcF′c(ƒ)+ρwgF′wg(ƒ)+ρmsF′ms(ƒ)+ . . . +F0 (12)
G0, F0=sum of all the offset terms
G′(ƒ), F′(ƒ)=G(ƒ), F(ƒ)—offset terms
where
ρx=αxlx; x=propagation loss constant, l=length
δx=lx/c; c=speed of light in vacuum
In other embodiments, any combination of transmission line models can be employed. Multiple functions within the summation may also represent the same transmission line type with different physical characteristics. For example, a transmission line of three waveguide segments of differing physical characteristics can be modeled as follows:
G(η)=δwg1G′wg1(ƒ)+δwg2G′wg2(ƒ)+δwg3G′wg3(ƒ)+ . . . +G0
F(η)=ρwg1F′wg1(ƒ)+ρwg2F′wg2(ƒ)+ρwg3F′wg3(ƒ)+ . . . +F0 (13)
The summation of the phase and loss functions models test set-ups, test-fixtures, calibration standards, and/or the like as components that comprises respective coaxial, rectangular waveguide, and microstrip segments. The offset terms (G0 and F0) are used to account for phase wrapping and loss for applications that are far from DC and for high pass devices that do not have a solution at DC. Additionally, equations (12) are advantageous, because the coefficients have physical meaning. The coefficients of the phase function (G(f)) are the estimated delays of each transmission line segment. The coefficients of the loss function (F(f)) are related to the estimated loss of each line segment. Upon the determination of the coefficients, equations (12) can then be used in conjunction with equations (2) and (4) to address transmission line phase response and loss associated with VNA measurements. Moreover, given the delay values from the G(f) coefficients, the loss constants of each transmission line segment can be determined. If the propagation loss constants have been determined, length can be determined and used as a cross check against the solution from the G(f) function.
Referring now to the drawings,
Each of modules 106, 107, and 108 achieves a greater degree of accuracy using transmission line compensation module 105. Specifically, when measurement data is obtained (e.g., from a device of interest or a calibration standard), the measurement data is provided to transmission line compensation module 105. Transmission line compensation module 105 uses the offset terms, the coefficients, and equations (2), (4), and (12) to provide phase compensation and amplitude compensation. For example, when calibration procedures occur, transmission line parameters associated with an electronic calibration device may be retrieved from data file 109 and provided to transmission line compensation module 105. As measurement data is generated by applying a stimulus signal to the calibration device, the phase and amplitude corrections are applied to the measurement data by transmission line compensation module 105. Auto-calibration module 107 then calculates systematic error terms using the corrected measurement data.
Some representative embodiments may provide a number of advantages. For example, calibration methods that rely on accurate phase information (e.g. TRL, unknown thru, offset load, adapter removal, and/or the like) will exhibit improved performance. Additionally, some representative embodiments do not exhibit issues associated with computational round-off errors as would occur if higher order polynomial solutions were applied.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4024460 | Vifian | May 1977 | A |
5434511 | Adamian et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5715183 | Grace et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6300775 | Peach et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6396285 | Blackham | May 2002 | B1 |
6396287 | Kapetanic et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6529844 | Kapetanic et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6643597 | Dunsmore | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6826506 | Adamian et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20040064774 | Fabry et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040150411 | Liu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050030047 | Adamian | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2273364 | Jun 1994 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060226856 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |