This application claims the benefit of the Spanish Patent Application No. ES P200930378, filed on Jun. 30, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to the field of mobile telecommunications, and more specifically to allocating timeslots dedicated to voice calls for optimizing the downlink dual carrier.
Scarce spectrum and growing customer demand for faster data throughput are challenges perceived by almost all mobile operators. The existing approaches squeeze the spectrum by enhanced spectrum efficiency algorithms like higher order modulation, but it implies big impact on existing network and handsets, so that in most cases new and expensive hardware has to be introduced.
On the other hand there is already a GSM feature standardised in 3GPP which addresses higher throughput needs without hardware impact at all in the network: downlink dual carrier (DLDC). With DLDC the mobile station is able to receive data over 2 frequencies simultaneously instead of only 1, so that the data rate is doubled.
Dual carrier allows to double the number of timeslots per user and hence the throughput. A description of dual carrier can be found including the 3GPP specification in 3GPP 45.912 Chapter 7.
In GSM data connections, number of timeslots allocated per user is defined in the terminal class, which defines the maximum number of timeslots in downlink (DL), uplink (UL) and DL&UL. Although it is possible to have non adjacent timeslots for data it is hardly limited by the terminal capability (i.e., if a terminal supports 4 timeslots in downlink, it will be able to have at the same time timeslot 7 and 4 as timeslot separation is 4, but not timeslots 7 and 3).
However, in order to be able to use the DLDC capability, several timeslots in different TRXs (transceivers) need to be empty at the same time (i.e. if a cell has 4 TRX there must be at least two TRXs empty within the range of timeslots supported by the mobile). This solution enables to allocate voice resources so empty resources can be used for DLDC.
In order to comply with both the scarce spectrum in one band and the customer demand for faster data throughput, the DLDC feature with a simple but ingenious addition is taken into account. DLDC will use timeslots in different TRXs that are empty at the same time. In order to have that situation as many times as possible the algorithm will allocate voice traffic in contiguous timeslots.
BSC (Base Station Controller) will monitor every x seconds the status of the different timeslots used for voice calls. Voice calls will be located either on the low or high timeslots, and data calls will be located in the other side, e.g. Timeslot 0 has highest priority for voice calls but lowest for EDGE evolution calls. BSC will check if there are empty timeslots with higher priority for voice calls than the ones being used. If that is the case, those voice calls will be moved to the empty timeslots. This will free timeslots in different TRXs that can be used together with DLDC feature.
It is well-known that abbreviations and acronyms are frequently used in the mobile telephony field. Below is a glossary of acronyms/terms used throughout the present specification:
Embodiments of the invention relate to methods for voice call resource reallocation in the downlink dual carrier.
For example, a disclosed method comprises:
The priority for voice calls of each empty timeslot can be obtained as a whole, considering all the TRXs of the BTS.
The priority for voice calls of each timeslot dedicated to voice calls can be obtained as a whole, considering all the TRXs of the BTS.
The priority for voice calls is preferably assigned as follows:
In one embodiment, in TRXs of the same type, the timeslot belonging to a first TRX with more empty timeslots than a second TRX have higher priority for voice calls than the timeslot at the same position belonging to the second TRX.
In another embodiment, the lower the number of the timeslot in a TRX the higher the priority for voice calls. In another embodiment, the higher the number of the timeslot in a TRX the higher the priority for voice calls.
The step of monitoring the status and the subsequent steps of the voice call resource reallocation method can be repeated periodically.
An example system for voice call resource reallocation in the downlink dual carrier comprises a BSC configured for:
The priority for voice calls of each empty timeslot can be obtained as a whole, considering all the TRXs of the BTS.
The BSC can be configured to obtain the priority for voice calls of each timeslot dedicated to voice calls as a whole, considering all the TRXs of the BTS.
The BSC can be also configured to assign the priority for voice calls as follows:
The BSC can be configured to assign higher priority for voice calls to a timeslot belonging to a first TRX than to a timeslot at the same position belonging to a second TRX, the first TRX having more empty timeslots than the second TRX and being said first and second TRXs of the same type.
In a disclosed embodiment the BSC is configured to carry out periodically the monitoring of the status of the timeslots dedicated to voice calls for repeating, if necessary, the voice call resource reallocation.
A series of drawings which aid in better understanding the invention and which are expressly related with an embodiment of said invention, presented as a non-limiting example thereof, are very briefly described below.
A new algorithm is defined in order to allocate voice calls in a way that it is more efficient for data connections. This new algorithm will be used in admission control (i.e. whenever a voice call is allocated a new channel) and also on a periodic basis in order to reduce problems for oncoming data calls.
In wireless networks, voice is the highest priority service so in most cases voice call will get the resources and data calls will have the resources that are left. Whenever there is a conflict between voice and data, usually voice has the priority.
This algorithm will define a number of channels which are more suitable for data calls, although they do not have to be necessarily reserved for data calls. In order to define these channels there will be some parameters defined by the operator:
This algorithm is focused on enhancing data performance by modifying the voice call resource allocation. Data calls allocation is not under the scope of the present invention.
Timeslots Priority Order
When a new voice user is going to be allocated a new channel in one cell, the algorithm shall take into consideration that the new voice channel should be allocated as close as possible to the other voice channels in order to free consecutive timeslots for data users. Available timeslots will be ordered based on an allocation priority as follows:
1. Timeslots in TRXs (transceivers in charge of transmitting) that are not preferred for data.
2. Timeslots in TRXs that are preferred for data.
3. In any TRX, the timeslots that are farther away from the timeslots preferred for data will have higher priority.
4. For timeslots located at the same position belonging to TRXs in same conditions, the timeslot belonging to TRX with more empty timeslots will have higher priority.
An example of an initial situation in the downlink dual carrier is shown in
Timeslots priority allocation in this example (according to the timeslots priority order) is represented in
According to the method, the goal is to move timeslots dedicated to voice calls that are in the packet area (higher timeslots) to the voice call area (lower timeslots). The order of the voice call timeslots to be allocated is indicated by an ordinal number (the lower the number, the higher the order to be allocated). Free timeslots priority order (the priority order for the free timeslots where the voice call timeslots are to be allocated) is indicated by an underlined ordinal number (the lower the number, the higher the priority of the free timeslot to be used for the allocation).
The first step of the voice timeslots reallocation process is indicated in
In every step of the reallocation process the reallocation will be carried out only if there is an improvement in the allocation process (that is, if the free timeslot would have a higher priority order than the voice call timeslot supposing it were free); if that is not the case the reallocation process ends. In the example shown in
Congestion Control
As a protection (congestion control) there will be an algorithm that will repack the voice communications in order to free space for upcoming data calls.
There is a parameter that will control the periodicity of the algorithm in seconds (repacking period).
Algorithm
Three parameters can be defined in the algorithm:
The pseudocode of the algorithm can be the following:
Free Data Timeslots is the number of current free data timeslots and Free_Voice_Timeslots is the number of current free voice timeslots.
The function Order (Timeslots) will order the timeslots according to the timeslots priority order, as shown in
The function Reallocate Timeslot (i) will reallocate voice call in timeslot i to another timeslot following the timeslots priority order, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200930378 | Jun 2009 | ES | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5491741 | Farwell et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
6006092 | Ward | Dec 1999 | A |
6418317 | Cuffaro et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
20030035434 | Le et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050070295 | Horanieh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060092877 | Niemela | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121946 | Walton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165122 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070104134 | Pecen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090168797 | Danielson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090245224 | Iyer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110077017 | Yu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007072341 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007116224 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report issued on Oct. 27, 2010 in connection with corresponding European Patent Application No. 10167928.0. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100331005 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |