Voice enhancement system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5471527
  • Patent Number
    5,471,527
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 2, 1993
    30 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 28, 1995
    28 years ago
Abstract
A telecommunications network (120) is provided with adaptive gain control (AGC) of the voice signals in network (120). Network (120) includes an input (12) for receiving a voice signal, an output (14) for receiving the voice signal, and a coupling between input (12) and output (14) including at least one switch (124) or (126). Network (120) also includes voice enhancer (10) including power averager (18) for measuring and determining the average power of an input signal. Voice enhancer (10) also includes bass band equalizer (16) to attenuate a predetermined portion of the input signal to provide an equalized input signal. From the average power of the input signal is determined a scaling factor from a gain/attenuation look-up table (28). Voice enhancer (10) also includes output scaler (30) coupled to output (14), output scaler (30) scales the equalized input signal with the scaling factor and provides the scaled signal to output (14). Voice enhancer (10) also includes bass to treble power comparator (20) for detecting tandem enhancement and voice-band data detector (22) which cause enhancer (10) to be disabled appropriately.
Description

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates in general to the field of voice signal processing in a telecommunications network, and more particularly to an improved method and apparatus for enhancing the quality of voice signals in a telecommunications network.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Modern telecommunications networks are comprised of input and output devices, e.g., telephone sets, local central offices, and one or more telephone switches which are used for processing voice signals in the network. Voice signals can be characterized as containing two regions, including the bass region and the treble region. The bass region is typically considered to be that part of the voice signal below 300 hertz (Hz), and the treble portion is that part of the signal above 300 Hz. Voice signals may be attenuated in the bass band region by one or more of the elements in a telecommunication network.
The Electronic Industry Association (EIA) standard RS-470, published January 1981, recommends that the input voice signal be attenuated below approximately 300 Hz by the codec in the input telephone station. This attenuation of the amplitude of the bass portion of the input voice signal is recommended because background noises in a telecommunication network lie in the bass region. By decreasing the amplitude of the bass portion of the input signal, the background noises of the network are also diminished.
Additionally, central offices of a telecommunication network may also attenuate the bass band region of a voice signal. Within a central office may be located a channel bank which converts the analog input voice signal to its digital equivalent. The digital voice signal is coupled to the receiving telephone set by a digital telephone switch or switches. Before the signal is provided to the receiving telephone set, it is converted back to analog format at another central office located between the last switch and the receiving telephone set. A channel bank may attenuate the bass portion of the input voice signal during the analog to digital conversion process.
Some networks, therefore, attenuate the bass region of the input voice signal twice; in the input telephone set and in the central office. Attenuation of the bass region of the input signal results in a voice signal at the receiving telephone set that is not a true representation of the speaker's voice. Techniques have thus been proposed to compensate for the loss of bass in a telephone speaker's voice.
One prior approach for providing an enhanced voice signal in a telecommunications network utilizes a fixed gain technique. In the fixed gain approach, the bass portion of the voice signal is amplified while the signal is in the telecommunications network and before it is supplied to the receiving telephone set. This approach compensates for attenuation of the input signal with a fixed gain at some point within the network. This approach also amplifies the previously noted network background noises within the bass band region.
Moreover, if the input voice signal is a loud signal, i.e., the speaker is speaking at a high decibel (dB) level, the fixed gain enhancement approach will further amplify the high decibel signal, thus resulting in a signal at the receiving telephone set which can be uncomfortable to listen to. Alternatively, applying a fixed gain to a high decibel input signal can result in over-driving/saturating different network elements, making the signal less clear than it would have been if the fixed gain had not been applied.
An additional problem associated with the fixed gain technique for voice enhancement occurs when data is transmitted over the telecommunications network in the voice-band. This is becoming a more frequent occurrence for telecommunications systems as the use of facsimile machines and modems coupling computers continues to grow. A modem or facsimile machine transmits voice-band data at a high amplitude and at a high-frequency, e.g., 2700 Hz. Therefore, should the fixed gain technique be applied to a voice-band data signal, it will be unnecessarily amplified, thus resulting in a voice-band data signal that is difficult to use on the receiving end.
Detectors for sensing the transmission of voice-band data have been employed to solve the problems associated with voice-band data transmissions. These detectors are remote to the fixed gain enhancement circuitry, requiring an external control link to the enhancement circuitry for disabling the circuitry. This ensures that the voice-band data is not amplified.
Another problem associated with previously developed voice enhancement systems occurs when an input voice signal travelling in a telecommunications network encounters or must pass through multiple network elements (tandem network) that include fixed gain voice enhancement circuitry. Current fixed gain voice enhancement systems cannot detect when a input voice signal has already been adjusted by the fixed gain technique. Therefore, a voice signal amplified in a first element of a tandem network may be subsequently again amplified by the second element in the network. This additional amplification can result in the saturation of the voice signal, or at a minimum, make the signal uncomfortable to listen to on the receiving telephone set. Also, multiple enhancements to a voice signal can result in oscillation of the voice signal in the tandem network.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Therefore, a need has arisen for a voice enhancement system which eliminates the problems associated with prior voice enhancement systems.
A need exists for a voice enhancement system which does not amplify the background noise of the telecommunications network during periods of silence on the network.
A need further exists for a voice enhancement system that does not amplify higher level voice signals.
An additional need exists for a voice enhancement system that will not over-drive or saturate higher level voice signals.
A need exists further for a voice enhancement system that detects the transmission of voice-band data without requiring a separate external detector.
A further need exists for a voice enhancement system that works effectively in a tandem network.
An additional need exists for a voice enhancement system that does not cause oscillation of the voice signal.
Therefore, one aspect of the present voice enhancement system prevents the amplification of background noise during periods of silence on the network call.
Another aspect of the present system adaptively changes the amplification of the voice signal so that voice signals of sufficient strength are not amplified.
An additional aspect of the present system ensures that high level voice signals are not over-driven or saturated.
Another aspect of the present invention is that it internally detects the transmission of voice-band data and disables signal enhancement appropriately.
An additional aspect of the voice enhancement system of the present invention is that it can successfully be employed in a tandem network.
Yet another aspect of the present system is that it minimizes opportunity for causing oscillation of the voice signal.
In accordance with the present invention, a voice enhancement system is provided which substantially eliminates or reduces disadvantages and problems associated with prior fixed gain enhancement systems.
A system including the adaptive gain control voice enhancer of the present invention includes an input for accepting voice signals and an output for receiving voice signals with a coupling between the input and output. The coupling includes a voice enhancer which contains a power averager for determining the average power of the voice signal. The voice enhancer also includes an equalizer for attenuating a predetermined portion of the voice signal and an output scaler for scaling the equalized voice signal in response to the determined average power and providing the scaled signal to the output.
Specifically, the voice enhancer of the present invention includes a voice-band data detector and a tandem voice enhancement detector, either of which can disable the voice enhancer appropriately.
A method for providing adaptive gain control with the voice enhancer of the present invention includes determining the average power of an input voice signal, and determining a scaling factor in response to the average power of the input signal. The present inventive method also includes equalizing the input voice signal by attenuating a predetermined portion of the input voice signal. The present method includes scaling the equalized input signal with the determined scaling factor and coupling the scaled voice signal to an output.
More specifically, the present method for providing adaptive gain control voice enhancement includes decoupling the scaled voice signal from the output upon detecting voice-band data or tandem enhancement.
A technical advantage of the adaptive gain control (AGC) voice enhancement system of the present invention is that it provides an enhanced voice signal which sounds more like the speaker's voice. The present adaptive gain control voice enhancement system is compatible with either voice signals or voice-band data signals being transmitted in a telecommunications network.
The present voice enhancement system also provides a technical advantage of eliminating problems associated with currently available fixed gain control voice enhancement systems. The adaptive gain control of the present system attenuates high level input voice signals and amplifies low level input voice signals. The present invention will, therefore, not saturate an input voice signal that is initially at a high level.
An additional technical advantage of the present adaptive gain control voice enhancement system is that it will not amplify periods of silence in a ongoing conversation between remote telephone sets. Therefore, the present system will not amplify network background noise when voice signals are not being transmitted.
Another technical advantage of the present invention is that it is capable of detecting in a tandem network a voice signal which has been previously enhanced. Upon detecting a tandem configuration, the present system disables itself so that a previously enhanced signal is not again amplified. This provides a technical advantage of preventing an oscillation condition of a signal in the network.
Yet another technical advantage of the present system is that it is capable of detecting the transmission of voice-band data and disabling the adaptive gain of the signal as required. The present invention is also self-disabling upon detection of a tandem network or voice-band data and does not require an external control link or detector.
An additional technical advantage of the present invention is that it can be implemented in existing telecommunications equipment, for example in the echo canceller of a network, the present system is also compatible with existing telecommunication networks.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like features and wherein:
FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of the adaptive gain control circuitry of the voice enhancement system of the present invention;
FIG. 2 shows a representative flow chart of the steps executed by the adaptive gain control circuitry for voice enhancement;
FIGS. 3a through 3d illustrate representative voice signals at different stages of the adaptive gain control process of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram depicting a possible location of the voice enhancement system of the present invention within a telecommunication network; and
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a telecommunications network incorporating the adaptive gain control system for voice enhancement of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the FIGURES, like numerals being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram for implementing the adaptive gain control (AGC) voice enhancement system of the present invention. Voice enhancer 10 of the present invention is coupled to an input 12 and an output 14. Input 12 is typically any device which would provide an input voice signal from a telephone set. Output 14, likewise includes any device used to produce an output voice signal to a telephone set.
Input 12 is coupled in parallel to a bass band equalizer 16, power averager 18, bass to treble power comparator 20, and voice-band data detector 22 on the input side of voice enhancer 10. Bass band equalizer 16 (or equalizer) equalizes an input voice signal by attenuating the amplitude of the treble portion of the input signal. Bass band equalizer 16 can be embodied in a digital filter which decreases the amplitude of the treble portion of an input voice signal. A typical demarcation between the bass and treble regions of the input voice signal is approximately 300 Hz, though other demarcations are possible without deviating from the inventive concepts of the present invention. Bass band equalizer 16 essentially equalizes the bass band distortion of the input signal introduced by an input telephone set and/or from analog to digital conversion of the signal in the channel bank of a central office.
Power averager 18 of voice enhancer 10 measures the average power of an input signal. This is accomplished with a variety of methods, and one embodiment of power averager 18 is a low pass filter through which the rectified input signal from input 12 is passed.
Also included in the input side of voice enhancer 10 is a tandem voice enhancement detector or bass to treble power comparator 20. Bass to treble power comparator 20 detects potential tandem enhancement of an input signal within a telecommunications network. Bass to treble power comparator 20 continually monitors the ratio of bass to treble power of the input signal. It is known that for an average input signal, the bass to treble power ratio is generally within a predetermined range. It is also known that the input telephone set and channel bank of a central office in a network attenuate the bass signal, thereby decreasing this ratio. Bass to treble power comparator 20 continuously monitors this ratio in the input signal. If the monitored bass to treble power ratio is much lower than expected for an enhanced signal then bass to treble power comparator 20 discerns that no tandem enhancement circuit is present. Conversely, if the monitored power ratio is comparable or higher than expected, then bass to treble power comparator 20 discerns that a tandem voice enhancement circuit is present. Bass to treble power comparator 20 provides a technical advantage of detecting when an input voice signal has been previously enhanced so that voice enhancer 10 can be used in tandem networks.
Voice-band data detector 22 also analyzes the input signal. Voice-band data detector 22 determines whether the input voice signal is voice-band data. Voice-band data detection methods are well known in the art and will not be elaborated here. Voice enhancer 10 incorporates one of the prior art methods of detection so that the adaptive gain control of the input signal can be disabled when voice-band data is detected. Voice-band data detector 22 provides a technical advantage of detecting the transmission of voice-band data internally to voice enhancer 10 without requiring external control links and detectors.
Coupled to bass to treble power comparator 20 and voice-band data detector 22 is AGC enhancement disable 24. Based on the inputs of bass to treble power comparator 20 and voice-band data detector 22, AGC enhancement disable 24 determines whether voice enhancer 10 should be disabled by switch 26. The default position of switch 26 enables voice enhancement of the input signal, and will be disabled when AGC enhancement disable 24 determines that either the input signal has been previously enhanced or that the input signal is voice-band data.
Gain/attenuation look-up table 28 is coupled to power averager 18. Once the average power of an input signal is determined at power averager 18, a signal representative of the average power is sent to gain/attenuation look-up table 28. Gain/attenuation look-up table 28 contains scaling factors that are applied to the input voice signal within the inventive concepts of the present invention. Gain/attenuation look-up table 28 is organized such that if the average power of the input signal is high, then the corresponding scaling factor is low. This provides a technical advantage of preventing the over-amplification of high level signals and prevents over-driving or saturating the signal.
The scaling factor can be less than unity if the average power of the input signal is sufficiently high. If the average power of the input signal is measured to be low, then the corresponding scaling factor is high. A typical input signal at average input power would have a corresponding scaling factor which provides minimal gain or attenuation of the signal, thereby ensuring that all signals receive AGC. Adaptively changing the scaling factor provides a technical advantage of preventing oscillation of the voice signal.
Output scaler 30 is coupled to gain/attenuation look-up table 28. Output scaler 30 is also coupled to bass band equalizer 16 which provides the equalized input signal to output scaler 30. Output scaler 30 applies the previously determined scaling factor from gain/attenuation look-up table 28 to accordingly amplify or attenuate the equalized input signal. Output scaler 30 provides the amplified signal to output 14.
Also shown in FIG. 1 is transparent path 32. Transparent path 32 is coupled to input 12 and enhancement disable position 34 of switch 26. Variable attenuator 36 is located between the ends of transparent path 32. Variable attenuator 36 can be included in voice enhancer 10 to provide enhanced noise suppression when voice enhancer 10 detects silence at input 12. When silence is detected, switch 26 is placed at enhancement disable position 34, and the path between input 12 and output 14 is by transparent path 32.
Upon switching to transparent path 32, variable attenuator 36 is set for minimum attenuation. Over a period of time each signal below the voice threshold causes the attenuation in variable attenuator 36 to increase (for example, 0.5 decibels per 3 milliseconds) toward a maximum value for variable attenuator 36. Increasing the attenuation of variable attenuator 36 causes the background noises of the network to be suppressed. This provides the technical advantage of minimizing the level of background noises during periods of silence.
As the level of the input signals increase, the attenuation of variable attenuator 36 decreases towards minimum attenuation. After a short period of integration (for example, 3 samples of the input signal) of input signals above the predetermined threshold, switch 26 moves back to its default position allowing for adaptive gain control of the input signals. Variable attenuator 36 is then reset to minimum attenuation.
It is noted that the functional blocks depicted in FIG. 1 may be embodied in separate discrete devices or in a single integrated circuit without departing from the inventive concepts of the present invention. Additionally, it is noted that the functional blocks depicted in FIG. 1 may be implemented in whole or in part in software as well as in hardware.
The operation of voice enhancer 10 of FIG. 1 will be discussed in connection with the flowchart of FIG. 2 and the representative signals of FIGS. 3a through 3d.
FIG. 2 depicts representative steps executed by voice enhancer 10 of the present invention for AGC of an input voice signal. The flow begins at step 50, and at step 52, the present voice enhancement process is initiated when an input signal greater than a predetermined threshold is detected. Below the predetermined threshold silence is declared to exist on input 12, and switch 26 of voice enhancer 10 is placed in enhancement disable position 34. An example for the predetermined threshold is 0.40 dBmO, but it can also be adaptively changed based on quiescent noise levels in the network or on the power level of the input voice signal. When silence is detected and switch 26 is placed in enhancement disable position 34, the input signal is provided to output 14 without scaling. This provides the technical advantage of preventing the amplification of network background noise during periods of silence. Any of the blocks associated with the input side of voice enhancer 10 (bass band equalizer 16, power averager 18, bass to treble power comparator 20, or voice-band data detector 22) can be used for detection of silence and an input voice signal.
Upon the detection of an input signal, a frame count is initiated at step 54. A frame system is used by voice enhancer 10 to divide up the transmission of signals into periods of time. A typical frame period used in voice enhancer 10 correspond to 3 milliseconds.
Once an input voice signal has been detected at input 12, then at step 56 voice enhancer 10 determines whether the input signal has been previously enhanced. As described in conjunction with FIG. 1 above, for an average speech signal, the bass to treble power ratio is roughly within a predetermined range. At step 56, bass to treble power comparator 20 measures the bass to treble power ratio to determine whether it is consistent with a previously enhanced signal indicating that a tandem configuration exists. At step 58 a decision is made as to whether the tandem enhancement is present. If a tandem enhancement is present, then the flow proceeds to step 60 where AGC voice enhancement is disabled by AGC enhancement disable 24 by sending an appropriate signal to switch 26 or its equivalent so that switch 26 will be moved to its enhancement disable position 34 (See FIG. 1). Since switch 26 is preset at a default position enabling voice enhancement, then if a tandem configuration is not detected at step 58, the flow proceeds to step 62.
At step 62 the presence of voice-band data is detected. Voice-band data detector 22 implements well-known voice-band data detection methods which need not be discussed in detail. At step 64 a query is made as to whether voice-band data is present in the input signal. If voice-band data detector 22 senses the transmission of voice-band data at input 12, then at step 64 it sends an appropriate signal to AGC enhancement disable 24, which causes switch 26 or its equivalent to move to enhancement disable position 34 at step 60. If voice-band data is not present at step 64, then the flow proceeds to step 66.
It is noted that a detection of a tandem configuration by measuring the bass to treble power ratio at step 56, and the detection of the transmission of voice-band data at step 62, can occur either simultaneously or in reverse order to that which is depicted in FIG. 2. It is also noted that the default position of switch 26 or its equivalent is to enable voice signal enhancement with the inventive concepts of the present invention. Upon detection of a previously enhanced signal or voice-band data will voice enhancement circuitry 10 be disabled at switch 26.
At step 66, power averager 18 measures the power of the input signal, and at step 68, the power averager 18 determines the average power of the input signal. At step 70, power averager 18 sends a signal representative of the measured averaged power to gain/attenuation look-up table 28. At step 70, gain/attenuation look-up table 28 provides a gain/attenuation factor or scaling factor based on the measured average input power. The scaling factor is related to the measured average power as previously described, wherein an input signal with a high average power corresponds to a low or attenuating scaling factor, and a low level input signal corresponds to an amplifying scaling factor. At step 72, bass band equalizer 16 equalizes the input voice signal.
FIG. 3a shows an example of a representative input voice signal. X-axis 100 is the frequency of the input signal, and Y axis 102 is the amplitude of the input signal in decibels (dB). Input signal 104 has associated with it a bass region 106 and treble region 108. Typically the demarcation between bass region 106 and treble region 108 is viewed as being 300 Hz on line 109, although other demarcation lines may be suitable. Bass region 106 of input signal 104 has been attenuated relative to treble region 108 by either or both an input telephone set and the channel bank of a central office.
FIG. 3b illustrates transfer function 110 applied by bass band equalizer 16 in step 72 to equalize input signal 104. It is noted that transfer signal 110 decreases the amplitude of treble portion 108 of the input signal relative to bass region 106 of input signal 104.
FIG. 3c depicts equalized signal 113 which is signal 104 following equalization at step 72 in bass band equalizer 16. Following equalization in bass band equalizer 16 by transfer function 110, equalized signal 113 has a relatively flat amplitude over the entire frequency range of the signal. It is noted that the determination of the scaling factor at step 70 and the equalization of the input signal at step 72 can occur simultaneously or in the reverse order to that depicted in FIG. 2.
The flow then proceeds to step 74 where scaling of the equalized signal 113 occurs. Output scaler 30 applies the scaling factor to equalized signal 113.
FIG. 3d illustrates two representative scaled output signals, wherein signal 114 shows equalized signal 113 following a positive or amplifying scaling factor, and signal 116 represents equalized signal 113 following a negative or attenuating scaling factor.
Following the application of the scaling factor to the input signal, the process proceeds to frame counter step 76. To avoid changing scaling factors too quickly, the scaling factor is adjusted every N frames with a maximum change of X dB, wherein for example, N could be 24 which corresponds to 3 milliseconds and X could be 0.5 dB. Therefore, the frame counter is incremented at step 76, and at step 78 it is determined whether a number of frames have passed which exceed N. If they have not, then the flow returns to step 74 where the same scaling factor previously determined is applied to the input signal until the frame count exceeds N. At step 78, if the number of frames exceeds N, the flow returns to step 52 where the entire process is begun again. This prevents a scaling factor from changing too quickly.
It is noted that the flow of FIG. 2 allows for continuous adaptive gain control (AGC) of the input signal. The scaling factor is redetermined every N frames of signal transmission allowing for changing the gain of the input signal as the input signal changes. It is also noted that methodology described in association with FIGS. 2 and 3a-3d is representative of a possible embodiment of the present invention, and that other embodiments are possible without departing from the inventive concepts of the present invention.
FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of voice enhancer 10 in echo canceller network element 80 in a typical telecommunications network. An example of echo canceller network element 80 is EC24 echo canceller manufactured and sold by DSC Communications Corporation. Voice enhancer 10 is shown in echo canceller network element 80 coupled to long haul input 86, which provides the input voice signals being processed in echo canceller network element 80. Voice enhancer 10 performs the necessary AGC scaling of the input voice signal as described in conjunction with FIGS. 1 through 3d above, and provides on tail out 88 the enhanced signals to hybrid 90. Hybrid 90 is coupled by tail in 92 to echo canceller adaptive filter 82 through summing circuitry 84. Summing circuitry 84 provides the output signals to long haul output 94. The operation of echo canceller element 80 to eliminate echoing effects in a two-way transmission line are well known in the art and will not be discussed herein. It is also noted that voice enhancer 10 does not have to be placed in echo canceller network element 80 as other elements within a telecommunications network are suitable locations for voice enhancer 10. It is noted that echo canceller network element 80 including voice enhancer 10 may be located in or separately from a telephone switch.
FIG. 5 shows telecommunications network 120 which is an example of a network which may incorporate the AGC voice enhancement system of the present invention to provide an improved voice signal transmission from input 12 to output 14. Input 12 includes an input telephone set which is coupled to central office 122. Central office 122 converts the analog voice signals to digital signals in a channel bank. Central office 122 provides coupling to telephone switch 124. Switch 124 is coupled to echo canceller network element 80 where voice enhancer 10 is included. Echo canceller element 80 is coupled to switch 126 and possibly others. Switch 126 shows an embodiment where echo canceller network element 81, including voice enhancer 10, is located within the switch rather than external to it. Either location of voice enhancer 10 can be employed without departing from its inventive concepts. Switch 126 is coupled to central office 128 which in turn provides coupling to output 14. The functionality of AGC voice enhancer 10 in echo cancellers 80 and 81 of network 120 is as previously described. It is noted that input 12 and output 14 will change roles as the telephone conversation progresses, thereby providing a two-way communication link between input 12 and output 14. It is noted that the embodiment of voice enhancer 10 in echo canceller network elements 80 and 81 is by way of an example of locations for voice enhancer 10 of the present invention.
In operation of voice enhancer 10 of the present invention, an input voice signal is received on input 12. Bass band equalizer 16 equalizes the input signal by attenuating the treble portion of the input signal. This essentially equalizes the signal which has previously had its bass region attenuated by various elements of the network. Power averager 18 measures and determines the average power of the input signal. Gain/attenuation look-up table 28 provides a scaling factor to be applied to the input signal based on the measured average power. Output scaler 30 applies the scaling factor to the equalized signal and supplies the scaled signal to output 14. The scaling factor is continuously updated so as the level of the input signal changes so does the scaling factor. This provides for adaptively gain controlling the voice signal. The default mode of voice enhancer 10 is to provide voice enhancement to the voice signal.
Voice-band data detector 22 analyzes the input signal to determine whether it includes voice-band data as opposed to a standard voice signal. Bass to treble power comparator 20 measures the power ratio of the bass portion to the treble portion of the input signal to determine if the signal has been previously enhanced in the network. If either previous enhancement or voice-band data is detected, then AGC enhancement disable 24 will cause switch 26 to decoupling the enhanced voice signal from output 14.
Therefore, the AGC voice enhancement system of the present invention provides for adaptive gain control by applying a scaling factor to an input voice signal and amplifying/attenuating the input voice signal to provide a more representative signal of the speaker's voice at the receiving telephone set. The present invention eliminates problems associated with prior fixed gain voice enhancement systems by continually and adaptively monitoring the input signal and appropriately scaling the input signal. Changes in the input signal are responded to so that when the input signal is received at the output receiving telephone set, a truer representation of the input voice signal is obtained.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims
  • 1. A method for providing voice enhancement in a telecommunications network, comprising the steps of:
  • determining the average power of an input voice-band signal;
  • determining a scaling factor in response to the average power of the input voice-band signal;
  • equalizing the input voice-band signal by attenuating a predetermined portion of the input voice-band signal;
  • scaling the equalized input voice-band signal with the scaling factor;
  • measuring the power of the input voice-band signal above and below a predetermined frequency;
  • comparing the power measurements to power measurements expected for a previously scaled signal; and
  • coupling the scaled voice-band signal to an output or decoupling the scaled voice-band signal from the output in response to the comparing step.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
  • detecting voice-band data in the input signal; and
  • decoupling the scaled voice band signal from the output.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said determining the average power, determining a scaling factor, equalizing, scaling, and coupling steps are performed in an echo canceller of a telecommunications network.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the predetermined portion of the input voice band signal is above substantially 300 Hz.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the predetermined portion of the input voice band signal is above substantially 400 Hz.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein said scaling the input signal step further comprises using the scaling factor for scaling the equalized input signal for a predetermined period of time.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
  • dividing the input voice band signal into a plurality of frames, each frame representative of a period of time; and
  • scaling the equalized input signal with the scaling factor for a predetermined number of frames.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein said determining a scaling factor step further comprises the step of limiting the amount of change between consecutive scaling factors.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said equalizing step further comprises filtering the input signal such that the power of the input signal above a predetermined frequency is attenuated.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein said determining the average power step further comprises low pass filtering a rectified input voice band signal.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
  • dividing the input voice band signal into a plurality of frames, each frame representative of a period of time;
  • continuously performing said determining the average power, determining a scaling factor, equalizing, scaling, and coupling steps upon the expiration of a predetermined number of frames.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
  • detecting periods of silence in the input voice band signal at the input; and
  • decoupling the scaled voice band signal from the output.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of attenuating the input voice band signal so that the noise level of the detected periods of silence is minimized.
  • 14. A method for providing voice enhancement in a telecommunications network, comprising the steps of:
  • determining the average power of an input voice-band signal;
  • determining a scaling factor in response to the average power of the input voice-band signal;
  • equalizing the input voice-band signal by attenuating a predetermined portion of the input voice-band signal;
  • scaling the equalized input voice-band signal with the scaling factor;
  • measuring the power of the input voice-band signal above and below a predetermined frequency;
  • comparing the power measurements to power measurements expected for a previously scaled signal;
  • coupling the scaled voice-band signal to an output or decoupling the scaled voice-band signal from the output in response to said comparing step; and
  • detecting voice-band data in the input signal and decoupling the scaled voice-band signal from the output.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein said determining the average power, determining a scaling factor, equalizing, scaling, and coupling steps are performed in an echo canceller of a telecommunications network.
  • 16. The method of claim 14 wherein the predetermined portion of the input voice band signal is above substantially 300 Hz.
  • 17. The method of claim 14 further comprising the steps of:
  • dividing the input voice band signal into a plurality of frames, each frame representative of a period of time; and
  • scaling the equalized input signal with the scaling factor for a predetermined number of frames.
  • 18. The method of claim 14 further comprising the steps of:
  • dividing the input voice band signal into a plurality of frames, each frame representative of a period of time;
  • continuously performing said determining the average power, determining a scaling factor, equalizing, scaling, and coupling steps upon the expiration of a predetermined number of frames.
  • 19. The method of claim 14 further comprising the steps of:
  • detecting periods of silence in the input voice band signal at the input; and
  • decoupling the scaled voice band signal from the output.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 further comprising the step of attenuating the input voice band signal so that the level of the detected periods of silence is minimized.
  • 21. A system for providing enhancement to a voice-band signal in a telecommunications network, comprising:
  • a power averager for determining the average power of the voice-band signal;
  • an equalizer for attenuating a predetermined portion of the voice-band signal;
  • an output scaler for scaling the equalized voice-band signal with a scaling factor in response to the determined average power;
  • a tandem voice enhancement detector for detecting when the voice-band signal has been previously scaled, wherein the tandem voice enhancement detector
  • measures the power in the voice-band signal above and below a predetermined frequency,
  • compares the power measurements to power measurements expected for a previously scaled signal, and
  • prevents the equalizer and the output scaler from equailizing and scaling the voice-band signal in response to the comparison.
  • 22. The system of claim 21 further comprising a voice-band data detector for detecting voice-band data in the voice band signal and preventing said output scaler from scaling the voice band signal.
  • 23. The system of claim 21 wherein said power averager, equalizer, and output scaler are located in an echo canceller of a telecommunications network.
  • 24. The system of claim 21 wherein the predetermined portion of the voice band signal attenuated by said equalizer is above substantially 300 Hz.
  • 25. The system of claim 21 wherein the predetermined portion of the voice band signal attenuated by said equalizer is above substantially 400 Hz.
  • 26. The system of claim 21 wherein said output scaler is operable to scale equalized voice band signals with a previously determined scaling factor for a predetermined period of time.
  • 27. The system of claim 21 wherein said output scaler is further operable to divide the voice band signal into a plurality of frames, each frame representative of a period of time, and to scale the voice band signal for a predetermined number of frames.
  • 28. The system of claim 21 wherein said output scaler is further operable to limit the amount of change between consecutive scaling factors.
  • 29. The system of claim 21 wherein said equalizer comprises a digital filter operable to filter the voice band signal above a predetermined frequency.
  • 30. The system of claim 21 wherein said power averager comprises a low pass filter.
  • 31. The system of claim 21 further comprising a gain/attenuation look-up table for providing the scaling factor to be used by said output scaler in scaling the voice band signal.
  • 32. The system of claim 21 further comprising a gain/attenuation look-up table for providing the scaling factor to be used by said output scaler in scaling the voice band signal, and wherein said gain/attenuation look-up table is organized such that low power voice band signals are assigned large scaling factors relative to high power voice band signals, the high power voice band signals being assigned low or negative scaling factors.
  • 33. The system of claim 21 further comprising:
  • a transparent path for providing the input voice band signal directly to an output so that the input voice band signal avoids scaling; and
  • an attenuator coupled in said transparent path for variably attenuating low level input signals lacking voice band signals.
  • 34. A system for providing enhancement to a voice-band signal in a telecommunications network, comprising:
  • an input for accepting the voice-band signal;
  • an output for receiving a signal; and
  • a coupling between said input and output including a voice enhancer, said voice enhancer comprising:
  • a power averager for determining the average power of the voice-band signal;
  • an equalizer for attenuating a predetermined portion of the voice-band signal;
  • an output scaler coupled to said output for scaling the equalized voice-band signal with a scaling factor in response to the determined average power and providing the scaled signal to said output; and
  • a tandem voice enhancement detector for detecting when the voice-band signal has been previously scaled, wherein the tandem voice enhancement detector
  • measures the power in the voice-band signal above and below a predetermined frequency,
  • compares the power measurements to power measurements expected for a previously scaled signal, and
  • decouples said output scaler from said output in response to said comparing step.
  • 35. The system of claim 34 further comprising a voice-band data detector for detecting voice-band data in the voice band signal and for decoupling said output scaler from said output.
US Referenced Citations (270)
Number Name Date Kind
1511423 Quarles et al. Oct 1924
1844424 Horton, Jr. Feb 1932
1955681 Mouradian Apr 1934
1968460 Llewellyn Jul 1934
2045300 Koch Jun 1936
2060843 Abraham et al. Nov 1936
2098350 Mitchell Nov 1937
2098956 Dudley Nov 1937
2102138 Strieby Dec 1937
2134059 Schade Oct 1938
2144565 Dreisbach Jan 1939
2151091 Dudley Mar 1939
2154579 Parrott Apr 1939
2167011 Tellegen Jul 1939
2170941 Davis Aug 1939
2173426 Scott Sep 1939
2190318 Kellogg Feb 1940
2206146 Wright Jul 1940
2209667 Taylor Jul 1940
2224569 Dickieson Dec 1940
2248746 Davis Jul 1941
2282465 Edwards May 1942
2300415 Green Nov 1942
2350951 Zinn Jun 1944
2513360 Rahmel Jul 1950
2606969 Scott Aug 1952
2606970 Scott Aug 1952
2606971 Scott Aug 1952
2606973 Scott Aug 1952
2607860 Skillman Aug 1952
2620402 Botsford et al. Dec 1952
2629783 Hopkins Feb 1953
2680232 Claras et al. Jun 1954
2710314 Tongue et al. Jun 1955
2759049 Scott Aug 1956
2766374 Hoffmann Oct 1956
2768353 Mansson Oct 1956
2777994 Hurault Jan 1957
2781417 Bower May 1957
2812498 Hall Nov 1957
2900609 Estkowski Aug 1959
2908761 Raisbeck Oct 1959
2948778 Clements Aug 1960
2964598 Parker Dec 1960
3045074 Mindermann Jul 1962
3083265 Paulaitis et al. Mar 1963
3083266 Mathews et al. Mar 1963
3102928 Schroeder Sep 1963
3114005 Kuhn Dec 1963
3145269 Gardner et al. Aug 1964
3183313 Cutler May 1965
3215788 Oswald Nov 1965
3281723 Mercer Oct 1966
3290442 Suganuma Dec 1966
3302175 Deracinois et al. Jan 1967
3306982 Ericsson Feb 1967
3313885 Aiken Apr 1967
3334184 De Koning Aug 1967
3339027 Feiner et al. Aug 1967
3360748 Fish et al. Dec 1967
3361520 Garrett Jan 1968
3397402 Schneider Aug 1968
3403228 Zebe Sep 1968
3414688 Hermes et al. Dec 1968
3428748 Flanagan Feb 1969
3436488 Barbato et al. Apr 1969
3449518 Erath Jun 1969
3452282 Beres Jun 1969
3465104 Zebe Sep 1969
3483336 Lent Dec 1969
3493686 Spittler et al. Feb 1970
3496465 Schroeder Feb 1970
3497621 Erath Feb 1970
3497622 Markin et al. Feb 1970
3508009 Henry et al. Apr 1970
3509500 McNair et al. Apr 1970
3530244 Reiffin Sep 1970
3571529 Gharib et al. Mar 1971
3573402 Chambers Apr 1971
3605042 Rapp Sep 1971
3617636 Oglhara Nov 1971
3624302 Atal Nov 1971
3649766 LaMarche Mar 1972
3651265 Van Der Houwen Mar 1972
3660609 Tremblay et al. May 1972
3665345 Dolby May 1972
3671676 Henry et al. Jun 1972
3678416 Burwen Jul 1972
3684838 Kahn Aug 1972
3689700 Lent Sep 1972
3689704 Wadding Sep 1972
3689711 Earle et al. Sep 1972
3693155 Crafton et al. Sep 1972
3696298 Kahn et al. Oct 1972
3699271 Berkley et al. Oct 1972
3706862 Chambers, Jr. Dec 1972
3740476 Atal Jun 1973
3753159 Burwen Aug 1973
3760108 Gacek et al. Sep 1973
3778563 Bise et al. Dec 1973
3781481 Shaffer et al. Dec 1973
3784749 Shigeyama et al. Jan 1974
3784756 Nemchik et al. Jan 1974
3798374 Meyers Mar 1974
3801747 Queffeulou et al. Apr 1974
3803357 Sacks Apr 1974
3803359 Corderman Apr 1974
3806658 Anderson et al. Apr 1974
3810247 Ono May 1974
3816668 Giesken Jun 1974
3818151 Chambers et al. Jun 1974
3819866 Hawley Jun 1974
3821473 Mullins Jun 1974
3828281 Chambers, Jr. Aug 1974
3838230 Bohman et al. Sep 1974
3846856 Griggs Nov 1974
3852535 Zurcher Dec 1974
3855431 Stewart Dec 1974
3868576 Bagdasarjanz et al. Feb 1975
3872266 Baxter, Jr. Mar 1975
3873775 Chown Mar 1975
3879583 Rooks Apr 1975
3889060 Goto et al. Jun 1975
3890465 Kaizu Jun 1975
3900708 Bendel Aug 1975
3903366 Coulter Sep 1975
3903378 Lee et al. Sep 1975
3906491 Gosswiller et al. Sep 1975
3909533 Willimann Sep 1975
3911370 Pace Oct 1975
3911371 Nakamura et al. Oct 1975
3911372 Seidel Oct 1975
3911415 Whyte Oct 1975
3914560 Greene Oct 1975
3916105 McCray Oct 1975
3918003 Seidel Nov 1975
3921077 Suzuki Nov 1975
3921168 Dunbar Nov 1975
3925708 Picciochi Dec 1975
3932712 Suntop Jan 1976
3934085 Munson et al. Jan 1976
3937887 Miller Feb 1976
3939428 Shimizu et al. Feb 1976
3942168 Whyte Mar 1976
3944723 Fong Mar 1976
3946170 Brooks Mar 1976
3959735 GrosJean May 1976
3967219 Dolby Jun 1976
3967264 Whyte et al. Jun 1976
3973087 Fong Aug 1976
3973240 Fong Aug 1976
3979557 Schulman et al. Sep 1976
3989896 Reitboeck Nov 1976
3991370 Pate Nov 1976
3997724 Seebinger Dec 1976
4004096 Bauer et al. Jan 1977
4004102 Ott Jan 1977
4005277 Araseki et al. Jan 1977
4007340 Russell Feb 1977
4017695 Jaconetty et al. Apr 1977
4027259 Zellmer May 1977
4028496 LaMarche et al. Jun 1977
4046960 Veale Sep 1977
4049928 Levi Sep 1977
4051331 Strong et al. Sep 1977
4054941 Shichman Oct 1988
4056688 Stiefel Nov 1977
4056791 Lohmann et al. Nov 1977
4058676 Wilkes et al. Nov 1977
4061874 Fricke et al. Dec 1977
4061883 Chambers, Jr. Dec 1977
4064507 Schmitz Dec 1977
4067008 Sprowls, III Jan 1978
4074069 Tokura et al. Feb 1978
4076959 Gilbert et al. Feb 1978
4087654 Mueller May 1978
4092493 Rabiner et al. May 1978
4100543 Stockdale et al. Jul 1978
4107460 Grunza et al. Aug 1978
4113983 Steel Sep 1978
4123711 Chow Oct 1978
4127743 Ozawa et al. Nov 1978
4132863 Smith Jan 1979
4135590 Gaulder Jan 1979
4141006 Braxton Feb 1979
4143325 Kahn Mar 1979
4156868 Levinson May 1979
4163119 Baba et al. Jul 1979
4164626 Fette Aug 1979
4167653 Araseki et al. Sep 1979
4177356 Jaeger et al. Dec 1979
4178472 Funakubo et al. Dec 1979
4179669 Dodson et al. Dec 1979
4182930 Blackmer Jan 1980
4188667 Graupe et al. Feb 1980
4197429 Sparber Apr 1980
4206450 Harden et al. Jun 1980
4207543 Izakson et al. Jun 1980
4210901 Whyte et al. Jul 1980
4217661 Kahn Aug 1980
4220817 Kampmann Sep 1980
4225822 Kariatsumari Sep 1980
4227046 Nakajima et al. Oct 1980
4229734 Schultz Oct 1980
4230905 Crum et al. Oct 1980
4247955 Weidemann Jan 1981
4250489 Dudash et al. Feb 1981
4268727 Agrawal et al. May 1981
4274155 Funderburk et al. Jun 1981
4277645 May, Jr. Jul 1981
4277655 Surprenant Jul 1981
4281218 Chuang et al. Jul 1981
4288871 Baugh Sep 1981
4296278 Cullison et al. Oct 1981
4300231 Moffitt Nov 1981
4301329 Taguchi Nov 1981
4301330 Trump Nov 1981
4315107 Cieselka et al. Feb 1982
4320257 Warman Mar 1982
4327250 von Recklinghausen Apr 1982
4330686 Roe May 1982
4331842 Kiko May 1982
4342023 Tsunoda et al. Jul 1982
4342985 Desjardins Aug 1982
4351983 Crouse et al. Sep 1982
4352962 LaMothe Oct 1982
4354160 Pierce Oct 1982
4382158 Ohshita et al. May 1983
4457014 Bloy Jun 1984
4468804 Kates et al. Aug 1984
4490843 Bose et al. Dec 1984
4506237 Matzek Mar 1985
4535445 Lane et al. Aug 1985
4542265 Brady Sep 1985
4589131 Horvath et al. May 1986
4592068 Jessop et al. May 1986
4609787 Horna Sep 1986
4628157 Chance et al. Dec 1986
4638298 Spiro Jan 1987
4644108 Crouse et al. Feb 1987
4652703 Lu et al. Mar 1987
4665383 Desjardins May 1987
4670903 Araseki et al. Jun 1987
4682358 Werner Jul 1987
4688245 Schenk Aug 1987
4707840 Nakayama Nov 1987
4713803 Ambrosio et al. Dec 1987
4731834 Duttweiler et al. Mar 1988
4747132 Ibaraki et al. May 1988
4809338 House Feb 1989
4811334 Matt Mar 1989
4829566 Lassaux et al. May 1989
4853581 Goudy, Jr. Aug 1989
4879746 Young et al. Nov 1989
4879748 Picone et al. Nov 1989
4882749 Zuk Nov 1989
4969144 Blackwell et al. Nov 1990
4991167 Petri et al. Feb 1991
5034984 Bose Jul 1991
5070524 Mano Dec 1991
5195132 Bowker et al. Mar 1993
5206902 Bowker Apr 1993
5222084 Takahashi Jun 1993
5278900 Van Gerwen et al. Jan 1994
5280473 Rushing et al. Jan 1994
5280525 Wesel Jan 1994
5317596 Ho et al. May 1994
5333195 Bowker et al. Jul 1994
5351291 Menez et al. Sep 1994
5388185 Terry et al. Feb 1995
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
1219649 Mar 1987 CAX
0022561 Jan 1981 EPX
0112523 Jul 1984 EPX
0304674 Jul 1988 EPX
0298621 Jan 1989 EPX
0489543 Oct 1992 EPX
2284229 Jan 1977 FRX
2333389 May 1978 FRX
2512300 Mar 1983 FRX
2549320 Mar 1987 FRX
2024129 Nov 1971 DEX
2261742 Jul 1973 DEX
2525137 Dec 1976 DEX
2817156 Oct 1979 DEX
2833518 Feb 1980 DEX
3120639 May 1983 DEX
3308321 Sep 1984 DEX
3629596 Mar 1988 DEX
245626 Sep 1987 JPX
230229 Oct 1987 JPX
62-53054 Mar 1988 JPX
20761 Jan 1989 JPX
0260933 Jul 1989 JPX
156038 May 1992 JPX
1434239 May 1976 GBX
2005968 Apr 1979 GBX
2023973 Jan 1980 GBX
2029175 Mar 1980 GBX
1580821 Dec 1980 GBX
1586210 Mar 1981 GBX
2090708 Jul 1982 GBX
2103907 Feb 1983 GBX
2106355 Apr 1983 GBX
2109207 May 1983 GBX
2109208 May 1983 GBX
2109209 May 1983 GBX
2111354 Jun 1983 GBX
2164529 Mar 1986 GBX
8301876 May 1983 WOX
8805621 Aug 1988 WOX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (31)
Entry
TELE, "Desirable Sending Frequency Response of Telephone Sets," Jan., 1989.
TELE, "Sound Transmission Quality--The Influence of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Bandwidth", Jan. 1972, pp. 44-53.
AT&T, "Public Switched Telephone Network--Changes to Transmission Characteristics", Technical Reference 50150, Issue 1.1, Jul. 1993, pp. 1-4.
M. Arsac, et al., "SICOFI--A Filter for Every SLIC", Siemens Components, vol. 23, No. 1, Feb. 1988, pp. 8-13.
G. J. Barnes, "Handset Telephone Characteristics in the Telecommunication Network," 1979 National Telecommunications Conference Record, pp. 51.1.1-51.1.5.
J. Bellamy, Digital Telephony, Wiley, 1982, pp. 65-71.
R. D. Blake, et al., "Voice Frequency Transmission Treatment for Special Service Telephone Circuits", Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 60, No. 7, Sep. 1981, pp. 1585-1619.
H. W. Bode, "Variable Equalizers", Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 17, No. 2, Apr. 1938, pp. 229-244.
R. A. Bruce, et al., "No. 4 ESS--Evolution of a Digital Switching System", IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. COM-27, No. 7, Jul. 1979, pp. 1001-1011.
A. H. Inglis, "Transmission Features of New Telephone Sets," Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 18, No. 5, Jul. 1938, pp. 359-380.
IEEE Radio Section Discussion, "To What Extent Does Distortion Really Matter in the Transmission of Speech and Music?", Journal of the IEEE, vol. 95 part III No. 38, Nov. 1948, pp. 471-472, continued in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, part III No. 41, May 1949, pp. 235-236.
M. Izsak, ed., Telecommunications Engineering, 2nd ed., Budavox Telecommunication Foreign Trading Co. Ltd., 1969, pp. 363-369.
L. R. Kahn et al., "Enhancement of Telephone Line Performance", Tech. Papers NAB Engineering Conference, Mar. 23-26, 1969, pp. 113-116.
L. Lerach et al., "Digital Duo Boosts Flexibility and Function of Telephone Lines", Electronic Design, Jan. 23, 1986, pp. 115-120.
K. B. Miller, Telephone Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill 1930, pp. 183-185, 239-250.
W. Neu et al., "Project for a Digital Telephone Network", IEEE Trans. Comm. Tech., vol. COM-16, No. 5, Oct. 1968, pp. 633-646.
P. W. Blye et al., "A Revised Telephone Transmission Rating Plan", Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 34, No. 3, May 1955.
D. O. Bowker et al., "Speech Transmission Quality of Wideband Packet Technology," IEEE/IEICE Global Telecommunications Conference 1987, vol. 3, pp. 47.7.1-47.4.3.
S. P. Chakravarti, "On Negative Resistance Equalizers for Telephone Transmission Systems", The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, vol. 23, Jan.-Jun. 1937, pp. 897-919.
E. H. Colpitts, "Scientific Research Applied to the Telephone Transmitter and Receiver", Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 16, No. 3, Jul. 1937, pp. 251-274.
D. L. Duttweiler, "Bell's Echo-Killer Chip," IEEE Spectrum, Oct. 1980, pp. 34-37.
Electronic Industries Association Standard EIA-470-A, "Telephone Instruments With Loop Signalling." pp. 8-12.
K. S. Johnson, Transmission Circuits for Telephonic Communication, van Nostrand 1927, pp. 1-5.
W. C. Jones, "Instruments for the New Telephone Sets", Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 18, No. 5, Jul. 1938, pp. 338-357.
J. Mills, Signals and Speech in Electrical Communication, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1934, pp. 12-21, 122-135.
J. E. Needham, "Standardization of Telephone Set Transmission Characteristics," 1979 National Telecommunications Conference Record, pp. 51.2.1-51.2.6.
E. F. O'Neill, ed., A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System: Transmission Technology (1925-1975), AT&T Bell Laboratories 1985, pp. 675-685, 688-689, 695-697, 727.
Yamaha Digital Equalizer DEQ-7, advertising brochure.
"R-`i`-P for AT&T Campaign", Advertising Age, vol. 65, No. 1, Jan. 3, 1994.
"Long Distance Telcos Reach Out and Touch Everyone--With Ads", Broadcasting and Cable, vol. 124, No. 3, Jan. 17, 1994, p. 131.
"Hi-Fidelity is Enlisted in Long-Distance Battle", The New York Times, vol. 142, p. D5(L), Jul. 14, 1993.