Voice-recognition safety system for aircraft and method of using the same

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] 1. Field of the Invention

[0003] The present invention relates, in general, to a safety system and method for an aircraft, and, in particular, to a voice-recognition safety system and method for an aircraft.

[0004] 2. Related Art

[0005] The following description of the background of the invention is intended to aid in the understanding of the invention, but is not admitted to describe or constitute prior art to the invention.

[0006] The terrorist attacks that occurred on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. have revealed that terrorists have found an almost perfect weapon in a hijacked aircraft, especially if the terrorists are suicidal. The inventors of an aspect of the present invention have recognized that a need exists for a method and system to lock out the controls of an aircraft, putting the aircraft in an automatic-pilot mode and/or ground-control mode, in the event of an emergency situation such as a hijacking, engine failure, etc.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0007] A further aspect of the invention involves a method of detecting an emergency situation in an aircraft. The method includes providing in an aircraft a voice-recognition safety system for detecting an emergency situation in an aircraft, the voice-recognition safety system including one or more sensors to pick up one or more spoken words or phrases of an aircraft pilot in an aircraft and transmit one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft, and a base unit including electronics to process the one or more signals and the electronics adapted to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft; and an alarm to indicate that an emergency situation has been detected in the aircraft; sensing with the one or more sensors one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft and transmitting one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases to the electronics; processing the one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft with the electronics and determining whether the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft; and initiating an alarm indicating that an emergency situation took place if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft. In one implementation, initiating an alarm may include one or more of the following: communicating to one or more entities that an emergency situation occurred and information related to the emergency situation, locking out one or more controls in a cockpit of the aircraft, putting the aircraft on automatic pilot, allowing the aircraft to be controlled from a remote location, recording an image of a perpetrator in the aircraft with a camera, and recording sound in the aircraft with a voice recorder.

[0008] Another aspect of the invention involves a voice-recognition safety system for detecting an emergency situation in an aircraft. The system includes one or more sensors to pick up one or more spoken words or phrases of an aircraft pilot in an aircraft and transmit one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft, and a base unit including electronics to process the one or more signals and the electronics adapted to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft, and an alarm to indicate that an emergency situation has been detected in the aircraft.

[0009] Other and further objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with the following detailed description of the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS:

[0010] The drawings illustrate both the design and utility of embodiments of the present invention, in which:

[0011]
FIG. 1 is an illustration of an embodiment of a graffiti detection system and method in an exemplary environment.

[0012]
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the graffiti detection system illustrated in FIG. 1.

[0013]
FIG. 3A is block diagram of an embodiment of a time domain characterization mechanism.

[0014]
FIG. 3B is a block diagram of an alternative embodiment of a time domain characterization mechanism.

[0015]
FIG. 4A is an illustration of an embodiment of a detection system similar to that illustrated in FIGS. 1-3, but for use in detection of a firearm shot, and is shown in an exemplary environment.

[0016]
FIG. 4B is an illustration of an alternative embodiment of a firearm shot detection system and method and is shown in an alternative exemplary environment.

[0017]
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the voice-recognition safety system.

[0018]
FIG. 6 is an illustration of an embodiment of a detection system similar to that illustrated in FIGS. 1-3, but for use in detection of a vehicle tire leak, and is shown in an exemplary environment.

[0019]
FIG. 7 is an illustration of an embodiment of a detection system similar to that illustrated in FIGS. 1-3, but for use in detecting the use of equipment such as a computer, and is shown in an exemplary environment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0020] With reference to FIGS. 1-7, a variety of different aspects of the invention will be described in the following sections I-VI. Section I describes an embodiment of a graffiti detection system and method of using the same. Section II describes an embodiment of a firearm shot detection system and method of using the same. Section III describes an embodiment of a voice-recognition safety system for a chauffeured vehicle and method. Section IV describes an embodiment of a voice-recognition safety system for an aircraft. Section V describes an embodiment of a vehicle tire leak detection system and method. Section VI describes an embodiment of an equipment use detection system and method. Each of these aspects will be described in turn below.

[0021] I. Graffiti Detection System

[0022] The graffiti detection system 100 detects a graffiti-making act and initiates one or more alarms to indicate that a graffiti-making act occurred. Examples of graffiti-making acts that are capable of being detected by the system 100 include, but not by way of limitation, the spraying noise that occurs with the spraying or tagging of a surface with a spray paint can, the rattling noise that occurs when shaking a spray paint can to mix the paint inside, the sound of a felt marker on a surface as the surface is being marked, and the sound of an abrasive device such as a glass cutter, diamond, razor, etc. as it scratches, defaces, or etches a surface such as glass. The graffiti detection system 100 includes one or more primary sensors 110 and a control unit or base unit 120.

[0023] Each primary sensor 110 is preferably a sonic sensor capable of picking up sound waves and converting the sound waves into electronic signals for further processing. Each sonic sensor may be capable of sensing a wide variety of sound frequencies, even sounds in the ultrasound frequency range. Examples of sensors 110 that may be used as a sonic sensor include, but not by way of limitation, a piezoelectric sensor, a dynamic sensor, an electret sensor, a carbon sensor, a bolometer sensor, an optical reflection sensor, a capacitive sensor, an inductive sound sensor, and an ultrasonic sensor used to detect and respond to specific sound spectrum patterns.

[0024] A graffiti-making act 130 such as the spraying noise from an aerosol spray paint can 140 by a perpetrator or tagger 150 has a specific sound spectrum frequency pattern or sound signature. The one or more sensors 110 may convert the sound of the spraying noise into a corresponding electronic signal.

[0025] Depending on the type of sonic sensor, each sensor 110 may be adapted to pick up a narrow frequency range or individual frequency of sound waves or a broad frequency spectrum of sound waves.

[0026] In the first instance, detection of a graffiti-making act 130 may occur, in essence, at the sensor 110. The system 100 may rely more on the inherent frequency characteristics of sensor(s) 110 for identification of a sound signature of a graffiti making act 130. For example, the sensor(s) 110 may only transmit a single frequency signal, e.g., a 900 megahertz signal, if a certain frequency or certain frequencies of sound are picked up by the sensor(s) 110. Thus, a specific sensor 110 may be used to detect a specific graffiti-making act 130, without the requirement of much identification processing by the base unit 120. In this embodiment, if the specific sensor 110 transmits an electronic signal, the base unit 120 may be able to assume, except for some minor processing and possible confirmation, that the specific graffiti-making act 110, which the specific sensor 110 is adapted to sense, has occurred. In this embodiment, different sensors 110 may be assigned to sense different graffiti-making acts 130, one or more of which may be used in the system 100. For example, a sensor A may be used to detect the spraying noise that occurs with the spraying or tagging of a surface with a spray paint can, a sensor B may be used to detect the sound of the rattling noise that occurs when shaking a spray paint can to mix the paint inside, a sensor C may be used to detect the sound of a felt marker on a surface as the surface is being marked, and a sensor D may be used to detect the sound of an abrasive device such as a glass cutter, diamond, razor, etc. as it scratches, defaces, or etches a surface such as glass.

[0027] In the latter instance, detection of a graffiti-making act 130 may occur, in essence, at the base unit 120. The system 100 may rely more on the base unit 120 to identify a graffiti-making act 130. In this embodiment, the sensor(s) 110 may pick up a broader range of frequencies and transmit them to the base unit 120 as a spread spectrum signal for processing and identification. Thus, in order to reduce the number of sensors used to detect a number of different types of graffiti-making acts, a single sensor 110 may be used to sense all the sound frequencies or sound frequency ranges of the graffiti-making acts 130 of interest and use the base unit 120 to process and determine whether the transmitted signal(s) correspond to a graffiti-making act.

[0028] The sensor(s) 110 may be one or more of the same or different types of sensors 110. For example, the sensor(s) 110 may include multiple sonic sensors of one or more different sonic sensor types. For example, as described above, specific sensors may be adapted to pick up specific sound frequencies or ranges of sound frequencies. The different types of sensors 110 may be used to pick up different frequency ranges for the same type of graffiti-making act, e.g., different frequency ranges for different spray noises made from different types of spray paint cans, or to pick up different frequency ranges for different types of graffiti-making acts, e.g., a first sensor may be used to detect spray painting, a second sensor may be used to detect the sound of a felt marker on a surface as the surface is being marked, etc.

[0029] Further, not only may the one or more sensors 110 be one or more different types of sonic sensors, the one or more sensors 110 may include one or more sensors other than sonic sensors in addition to or instead of one or more sonic sensors. For example, the one or more sensors 110 may include one or more olfactory sensors in addition to or instead of the one or more sonic sensors. An exemplary olfactory sensor that may be used in the system 100 is the NOSE CHIP™ made by Cyrano Sciences, Inc. of Pasadena, Calif. An olfactory sensor may be used in conjunction with the base unit 120 to sense the presence of one or more odors indicative of a graffiti-making act. For example, the olfactory sensor may be used to sense the odor of the propellant from a spray paint can, one or more other chemicals such as those from the paint of a spray paint can, the odor of xylene from a felt-tip marker, etc. One or more olfactory sensors may be used as one or more primary sensors 110 or primary means for detecting the occurrence of a graffiti-making act 130 or as a secondary sensor 335 or secondary means for confirming the occurrence of a graffiti-making act 130.

[0030] The one or more sensors 110 may communicate wirelessly with the base unit 120 or may be wired to the base unit 120. In a wireless embodiment, the one or more sensors 110 include a transmitter for wirelessly transmitting the signal(s) to the base unit 120 and a battery or other power supply. If one or more wireless piezoelectric sensors are used, the sensor(s) 110 may be located up to a distance of 400 ft. from the base unit 120 and still communicate therewith. If a 2.4 GHz sensor is used, the sensor(s) 110 may be located at a distance greater than 400 ft. from the base unit 120. A wireless piezoelectric sensor can also sense the noise from a graffiti making at a distance of 1000 ft or more from the graffiti-making act, especially if focusing an baffling mechanisms are used.

[0031] It is important to note, although the one or more sensors 110 are shown in FIG. 1 as being separate or remote from the base unit 120, in an alternative embodiment, the one or more sensors 110 may be integral with the base unit 120 so that the system 100 forms a single unit. Further, one or more of the sensors 110 may be integral with the base unit 120 and separate therefrom.

[0032] The one or more sensors 110 are preferably small, a few inches or less in size, making the sensor(s) 110 easy to conceal. The one or more sensors 100 are preferably strategically located at one or more locations in a vicinity 170 of a surface 180 prone to graffiti. The one or more sensors 110 may be mounted in direct contact with a surface such as, but not by way of limitation, a glass surface, a concrete wall, a brick wall, and the side of a building. Preferably, each sensor 110 is mounted at a location that is inconspicuous and inhibits tampering or deactivation.

[0033] The distance between the one or more sonic sensors and the graffiti-making act may be increased, allowing sensing from a more distant, inconspicuous position, if one or more sound focusing mechanisms 190 are used. Examples of sound focusing mechanisms that may effectively increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the sound detected by the one or more sonic sensors include, but not by way of limitation, a parabolic reflector, boom, shotgun directional microphone, phase array, or lens. FIG. 1 illustrates a sound focusing mechanism 190 in the form of a parabolic reflector adjacent to one of the sensors 110 in order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the sound detected by the sensor 110.

[0034] With reference additionally to FIGS. 2 and 3, the base unit 120 is also preferably strategically located in the vicinity 170 of the surface 180 prone to graffiti, at a location that is inconspicuous and inhibits tampering or deactivation. The base unit 120 may include a water-resistant housing 200 made of metal or plastic. The base unit 120 may include electronics 210 comprising hardware or hardware and software that processes the signal(s) from the one or more sensors 110, and initiates one or more alarms if a graffiti-making act is identified. The hardware and/or software of the base unit 120 may also determine whether a graffiti-making act 130 occurred by determining whether the signal(s) from the one or more sensors 110 correspond to a graffiti-making act. The hardware and/or software may also perform other functions described herein. Examples of hardware that may perform the functions described herein include, but not by way of limitation, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a set of wired logic circuits, and a hardwired circuit of electrical components, e.g., transistors, capacitors, and resistors. Examples of hardware and software that may perform the functions described herein include, but not by way of limitation, a programmed computer and an application specific computer.

[0035] In an embodiment of the base unit 120, the hardware and/or software may include a preamplifier 220, a mixer 230, a low pass filter 240, a precision rectifier 250, and a time domain characterization mechanism 260. The preamplifier 220, the mixer 230, the low pass filter 240, and the precision rectifier 250 may form part of a sensor interface for processing the incoming signal(s) from the one or more sensors 110, which will now be described. A signal from the one or more sensors 110 is amplified by the preamplifier 220 to a distinguishable level. The mixer 230 may combine the resulting signal with a predetermined center frequency from a local oscillator 270. If the frequency of the signal from the one or more sensors 110 closely matches the frequency of the local oscillator signal, heterodyning occurs, producing a high gain product signal. Next, the low pass filter 240 and the precision rectifier 250 combine to improve the signal to noise ratio by eliminating noise such as AC signals and passing only DC signals. The signal may then be authenticated, i.e., a determination may be made as to whether the signal represents a graffiti-making act, by the time domain characterization mechanism 260.

[0036] With reference to FIG. 3A, in an embodiment of the time domain characterization mechanism 260, the time domain characterization mechanism 260 may include a charge pump 270 for determining whether the signal represents a graffiti-making act 130. The charge pump 270 may include an electric circuit having one or more capacitors. The incoming signal charges the one or more capacitors, causing a rise in voltage over time until a signature signal of sufficient duration is authenticated, i.e., signal is transmitted to the one or more capacitors for a predetermined period of time determined by the time constant selected. Requiring that a signature signal be transmitted for a certain period of time helps to ensure that a graffiti-making act is accurately identified. After the signal is identified, a comparitor is triggered, causing an alarm 280 (FIG. 2) to be actuated. This embodiment of the time domain characterization mechanism 260 may be desirable if the one or more sensors 110 are adapted to pick up a narrow sound frequency range or individual sound frequency similar to or the same as that of a predetermined graffiti-making act because the components of the electronics 210 described above assume that if a signal is transmitted to the electronics 210, the signal is similar to or the same as that of a graffiti-making act, i.e., the one or more sensors 110 only deliver a signal if the frequency of the signal is similar to or the same as that of a graffiti-making act. The charge pump 270 functions to set a minimum time duration condition on the sound sensed by the one or more sensors 110, inhibiting false alarms caused by transient sounds from non-graffiti-making acts of the same or similar frequency. Thus, the charge pump 270 serves to authenticate the signal as one by a graffiti-making act by the ensuring the signal is of a predetermined duration as determined by the type of capacitor used.

[0037] With reference to FIG. 3B, in an alternative embodiment, the time domain characterization mechanism 260 may include a quantization characterization mechanism 290. The quantization characterization mechanism 290 may include a microprocessor 300, which may be the same as or different from any other microprocessor used in the system 100, and memory 310. The microprocessor 300 may use a digital signal processing application 320 stored in memory 310 to convert an analog signal from the low pass filter 240 into a digitized signal, and quantitize the resulting digital signal. The resulting quantitized information may be compared to a matrix of numbers 330 stored in memory 310 or a different memory for authentication of the signal(s) from the one or more sensors 110. The memory 310 may include multiple matrices of numbers 330 representing multiple respective predetermined graffiti-making acts 130 that the quantitized information from one or more signals may be compared to for determining the occurrence of multiple graffiti-making acts 130. The quantitized information may also include the duration of the signal(s) to ensure that the signal(s) is for at least a minimum duration to ensure that a graffiti-making act is accurately identified, inhibiting false alarms. After the signal is identified, the microprocessor 300 may cause the alarm 280 (FIG. 2) to be actuated. This embodiment of the time domain characterization mechanism 260 is desirable if the one or more sensors 110 are adapted to pick up a broad sound frequency range or different broad sound frequency ranges because the quantization characterization mechanism 290 may identify the signals from one or more different types of graffiti-making acts, allowing the graffiti detection system 100 to detect one or more different types of graffiti-making acts.

[0038] Those skilled in the art will recognize other well-known sound signature identification techniques may be used such as, but not by way of limitation, digitized algorithm analysis and Fourier Transform analysis.

[0039] The electronics 210 of the base unit 120 may include one or more of the following secondary sensors 335 or confirming means to confirm or further ensure that a graffiti-making act 130 occurred: a motion sensor to detect motion of the tagger 150, a heat sensor to sense body heat of the tagger 150, an olfactory sensor to detect an odor of a graffiti-making act, and a sonic sensor to detect a sound of a graffiti-making act.

[0040] The alarm 280 initiated or actuated after a graffiti-making act has occurred may include, but not by way of limitation, one or more of the following: an alarm to alert the tagger 150 and/or anyone in the vicinity that a graffiti-making act has been detected such as a bell, a light, a horn, a whistle, or a speaker; a marking mechanism adapted to mark the tagger 150 so that the police can easily identify the tagger 150 and have probable cause to arrest the tagger 150; a water sprinkler to wash the tagged surface 180; an infrared security video camera for recording and/or monitoring the tagger 150 committing the graffiti-making act 130, a flash camera to capture a still image of the tagger 150 committing the graffiti-making act, a disabling mechanism such as a cage, trap, e.g., two doors that automatically lock the tagger 150 in an area therebetween; and one or more communication devices 340 or interfaces. In a preferred embodiment, the alarm 280 does not alert the tagger 150 that a graffiti-making act has been detected by the system 100, but causes the communication device 340 to communicate to one or more entities or locations such as, but not by way of limitation, a police dispatcher so that a nearby police officer can be alerted as to the situation, one or more police officers on patrol in the general area of the graffiti-making act, an owner of the property where the graffiti-making act took place, and/or a security system center that a graffiti-making act has occurred. The communication device 340 may be any well-known communication device such as, but not by way of limitation, a dialer, a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet card), a communications port, a PCMCIA slot and card, a short-wave radio, etc. that may communicate voice, text, and/or video information to the one or more entities or locations. For example, the communication device 340 may be a dialer that dials one or more predetermined telephone numbers, pager numbers, wireless cellular or digital telephone numbers, and/or internet phone or device numbers for communicating a prerecorded voice, text message, and/or video clip indicating that the graffiti-making act took place. The voice and/or text message may include one or more of the following: the location of the graffiti-marking act, the type of graffiti-marking act, and/or the time the graffiti marking act took place.

[0041] In a preferred embodiment, a dialer is used as the communication device 340 and is capable of both listening at the site where detection has occurred as well as receiving audio and voice messages. The ability to listen as well as emit voice messages at the site where detection has occurred may be used to confirm that a graffiti-making act took place and is not, for example, an owner or city employee lawfully spray painting a surface. The ability to listen may be used to record voice or other sound activity as evidence for a later criminal proceeding, e.g., record voice of the perpetrator that committed the graffiti. The ability to emit an audio and voice message may also be used to confront the perpetrator.

[0042] The electronics 210 of the base unit 120 may include an automatic location identification device 350 such as a Global Positioning System (“GPS”) device for automatically identifying the location of the base unit 120. Alternatively, the base unit 120 may include a broadcasting mechanism 360 that broadcasts a signal from which the location of the system 100 can be identified and/or that a graffiti-making act 130 has been committed.

[0043] If the one or more sensors 110 are wireless, the base unit 120 preferably includes one or more receivers 370 for receiving the respective signal(s) and transmitting the signal(s) to the electronics 210 of the base unit 120.

[0044] The base unit 120 is preferably powered by one or more batteries 380, but may be powered by any well-known internal or external power source. If the battery 380 gets low, the electronics 210 may cause the communication device 340 to communicate to one or more entities responsible for replacing the battery 380 that the battery 380 is low and needs to be replaced.

[0045] Although the detection system 100 has been described above in conjunction with detection of a graffiti-making act, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the detection system 100 may be used in other applications to detect other occurrences, besides detecting graffiti.

[0046] II. Firearm Shot Detection System

[0047] For example, with reference to FIG. 4A, a detection system 500, which is similar in construction to the detection system 100 described above, may be used to detect the report of a firearm shot 510 from a firearm 520, e.g., a handgun, automatic weapon, rifle, etc., of a perpetrator 530, and an initiate an alarm in response thereto. In the past, when a crime was committed, the police would often show up at the scene of the crime without knowing whether the perpetrator(s) 530 were still in the area of crime scene, and, if so, whether the perpetrator(s) 530 were carrying a lethal weapon such as a firearm 520 that had been discharged. If the police knew one or more shots of a firearm had occurred at a crime scene, the police would know that investigating the crime may be dangerous. The police could prepare accordingly and alert the appropriate medical agencies. Thus, the inventors of the firearm shot detection system and method recognized that such a system and method could detect whether a firearm shot had occurred and alert the police accordingly.

[0048] The firearm shot detection system 500 illustrated in FIG. 4A is for fixed use, i.e., the object that the firearm detection system 500 is mounted to is not designed to move or be mobile, such as in possible armed robbery situations. For example, the firearm shot detection system 500 may be mounted to a wall 540 or counter 545 of an establishment 550, e.g., a convenience store such as 7-Eleven™, a jewelry store, a bank, a fast-food restaurant, a home, or any other establishment susceptible to an robbery, accidents, or violence involving a firearm. FIG. 4A illustrates an employee 560 such as a clerk behind the counter 545 of the establishment 550.

[0049] The firearm shot detection system 500 includes a base unit 570 and one or more sensors 580. Instead of the one or more sensors 110 and/or base unit 120 described above with respect to FIGS. 1-3 being configured to determine whether the sound signature of an act such as a graffiti-making act occurred, the one or more sensors 580 and/or base unit 570 determine whether the sound signature of a firearm shot 510 occurred. In FIG. 4A, a single sonic sensor 580 is illustrated as being integral with the base unit 570. As described above, in an alternative embodiment, the one or more sensors 580 may be separate or remote from the base unit 570.

[0050] Because the firearm shot detection system 500 is so similar in construction to the graffiti detection system 100 described above, further details as to the construction or structure of the firearm shot detection system 500 will not be described in additional detail. The discussion above with respect to the construction of the graffiti detection system 100 is equally applicable to the firearm shot detection system 500, and is thereby incorporated by reference.

[0051] An embodiment of a method of using the firearm shot detection system 500 will now be described. During a hold-up, burglary, robbery, etc., the perpetrator 530 of the crime (or the employee 560 of the establishment 550 in defense) may fire a firearm 120 such as a handgun, automatic weapon, rifle, etc. The report of the firearm shot 510 includes sound waves having a characteristic sound signature frequency or frequency pattern. A firearm shot 510 from each type of firearm, e.g., handgun, automatic weapon, rifle, etc., and each brand of firearm, e.g., Smith & Wesson™, Colt™, etc. has a unique sound signature frequency or frequency pattern similar to each different graffiti-making acts having a unique sound signature frequency or frequency pattern, as described above. The one or more sensors 580 convert the sound from the firearm shot 510 into an electronic signal or electronic signals that are processed by the electronics 210 in the base unit 570 for determining whether the electronic signal(s) are from a firearm shot 510 using any of the techniques described above or any other well-known technique used in sound signature analysis. If it is determined that the electronic signal(s) represents a firearm shot, one or more alarms are initiated. The one or more alarms may include one or more of the alarms described above with respect to the graffiti detection system 100 and method. One type of alarm that may be initiated upon detection of a firearm shot 510 is the locking of one or more automatic locking mechanisms for one or more doors 590. This may be desirable, for example, to lock the perpetrator 530 in an area between a pair of door 590 assuming that no innocent bystanders are in this detaining area with the perpetrator. Preferably, the one or more alarms include actuating a communication to an entity or location such as a police dispatcher, one or more police officers in the area, and/or a security system center alerting the entity that a firearm shot 510 was detected at the location of the establishment. Communicated information may include, but not by way of limitation, a firearm shot 520 was detected, the location of the firearm shot, the time of the firearm shot, the number of firearm shots detected, and/or the type of firearm shot. Thus, the firearm detection system 500 detects the sound signature of the report of one or more firearm shots, and may automatically alert the police in response thereto.

[0052] With reference to FIG. 4B, in another embodiment of the invention, a firearm shot detection system 600 similar to the firearm shot detection system 500 described above may be mounted to a mobile object 610 or be part of the mobile object 610. Examples of mobile objects include, but not by way of limitation, a police car, a police motorcycle, an armed money truck, an emergency vehicle, a limousine, an expensive car, a navigational system such as a GPS system, a wireless phone, a wireless internet device, a radio communication system, and any other portable communication device. Police officers are often shot at when investigating a crime or in the process of making an arrest. If a police officer is alone and is shot, the police officer may not be found in time for appropriate medical care to arrive. Further, if the police officer becomes engaged in a gun fight with one or more perpetrators, the police officer may not be able to radio a police dispatcher or other police officers for assistance without the risk of getting shot or allowing the one or more perpetrators to escape.

[0053]
FIG. 4B illustrates a number of exemplary embodiments of and locations for the firearm shot detection system 600. For example, the firearm shot detection system 600 may be mounted on a mobile object 610 such as a police car driven by a police officer 620. The firearm shot detection system 600 may be in the vehicle, as part of a radio communication system of the police car. The firearm shot detection system 600 may also be a wearable device or part of a wearable device such as part of a mobile object 610 that is a two-way radio. Similar to the firearm shot detection system 500 described above, the firearm shot detection system 600 detects the sound signature from the report of a firearm shot from a firearm 630 of a perpetrator 640, and may initiate one or more of the alarms described above. Preferably, the firearm shot detection system 600 will automatically communicate with a police dispatcher that a firearm shot has been detected. If the firearm shot detection system 600 is part of a communication device such as two-way radio or wireless phone, the firearm shot detection system 600 may communicate with one or more entities such as a police dispatcher using the existing communication device. Similar to the detection system 100 described above, the firearm shot detection system 600 may include an automatic location identification device such as a GPS device for automatically identifying the location of the firearm shot detection system 600, and, hence, the general location of the firearm shot detected. The firearm shot detection system 600 may automatically report to the police dispatcher one or more of the following: a firearm shot was detected, the location of the firearm shot, the time of the firearm shot, the number of firearm shots detected, and/or the type of firearm shot.

[0054] III. Voice-Recognition Safety System for Chauffeured Vehicle

[0055] In chauffeured motor vehicles such as, but not by way of limitation, taxi cabs, buses, limousines, and paratransit vehicles (e.g., private sedans, vans, airport shuttles, minibuses), the drivers or chauffeurs are often robbed, attacked, and/or killed by their passengers. The driver is particularly vulnerable when robbed or attacked in the chauffeured motor vehicle because the driver customarily has his back turned to the perpetrator and is confined to a small space. If an incident occurs, the driver becomes a prisoner in his only vehicle.

[0056]
FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of a voice-recognition safety system 642 for a chauffeured vehicle. In one or more embodiments, the system 642 may be installed at any convenient location of the chauffeured vehicle, e.g., in the dash, under the dash, on the dash, the system 642 may be a portable unit that may be carried from vehicle to vehicle, the system 642 may be integral with the radio communication system (e.g., two-way radio) of the chauffeured vehicle, and/or the system 642 may be separate from, but connected with the radio communication system of the chauffeured vehicle.

[0057] The system 642 may include one or more components similar to those in the systems 100, 500, 600 described above with respect to FIGS. 2, 4A, and 4B. For this reason, many of these components will not be described in additional detail and the discussion above with respect to the construction of the graffiti detection system 100 and firearm detection systems 500, 600 is equally applicable to the system 642, and is thereby incorporated by reference.

[0058] The system 642 may include one or more sensors 110 and/or a base unit 120 that may recognize spoken code word(s)/phrase(s) from the driver for activating an alarm 280 in the event of an emergency. The one or more sensors 110 and/or the base unit 120 may also determine whether the sound signature of a firearm shot occurred such as in the event that the driver of the chauffeured vehicle is shot at by a passenger. The one or more sensors 110 may be integral with and/or separate from the base unit 120.

[0059] The base unit 120 may include electronics 210 comprising hardware or hardware and software that processes the signal(s) from the one or more sensors 110, and initiates one or more alarms if code word(s)/phrase(s) are spoken by the driver and/or firearm shot(s) are detected. The hardware and/or software of the base unit 120 may determine whether spoken code word(s)/phrase(s) from the driver and/or firearm shot(s) occurred by determining whether the signal(s) from the one or more sensors 110 correspond to pre-recorded spoken code word(s)/phrase(s) and/or firearm shot(s).

[0060] The electronics 210 of the base unit 120 may include a voice-recognition chip 644 to determine whether spoken code word(s)/phrase(s) from the driver correspond to pre-recorded spoken code word(s)/phrase(s). Examples of voice-recognition chips 644 that may be used include, for example, the RSC-300 or RSC-364 speech-recognition chips sold by Sensory, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif., or the VP-2000 voice-recognition chip sold by Primestar Technology Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan. The voice-recognition chip 644 may replace one or more of the components shown in the electronics in FIG. 5.

[0061] The voice-recognition chip 644 may be used for speaker-dependent speech recognition or speaker-independent speech recognition. For speaker-dependent speech recognition, the speaker trains they system to recognize his/her voice by speaking each of the words in the inventory several times. In speaker-independent recognition, the device is not trained by the speaker's voice, since it was previously trained on samples from many different speakers during manufacturing. The voice-recognition chip 644 preferably allows for speaker-dependent speech recognition because this is a more accurate type of speech recognition. Further, with speaker-dependent speech recognition, the system 642 is less likely to accidentally cause a false alarm if a passenger uses one or more key words or phrases. Memory such as RAM or disk storage are provided in the system 642 if speaker-dependent speech recognition is used because the features in the voice that is training the system must be temporarily stored.

[0062] The voice-recognition safety system 642 may operate in continuous recognizer mode or may operate generally in a sleep mode where a key word awakens the system 642 to listen for one or more expected words or phrases. Operating generally in a sleep mode conserves power consumption of the system 642. The system 642 may allow the driver to switch between a continuous mode and a sleep mode. For example, when the vehicle is not running, the driver may switch to a sleep mode to conserve the power in the battery/batteries.

[0063] One or more of the one or more sensors 110 are microphones for picking up spoken words or phrases of the driver. The microphone(s) may be omni-directional microphone(s) or directional microphone(s). The microphone(s) may be integral with the base unit 120 and/or may be located remotely relative to the base unit 120. The microphone(s) may be mounted close to the mouth of the driver for better detection of spoken words or phrases from the driver. For example, the microphone(s) may be clipped to the driver-side visor or the microphone(s) may be part of a headset worn by the driver. The same microphone(s) used for communication with a dispatcher may be used for voice recognition of one or more key words or phrases.

[0064] The alarm 280 initiated or actuated after spoken code word(s) and/or firearm shot(s) have been detected may include, but not by way of limitation, one or more of the following: one or more communication devices 340 or interfaces that place a communication with one or more entities; an infrared security video camera that records and/or monitors the perpetrator in the vehicle; a flash or non-flash camera (e.g., infrared camera) that captures one or more still images of the perpetrator; a microphone and/or audio recorder that listens in on or records sound activity in the vehicle; a disabling mechanism such as a mechanism that kills the engine or an automatic door-locking mechanism that locks at least one of the doors of the vehicle or maintains at least one of the doors in a locked condition; and one or more external emergency lights (preferably not viewable from inside the vehicle) that alerts anyone in the vicinity of the chauffeured vehicle that the driver is having an emergency. In a preferred embodiment, the alarm 280 does not alert the perpetrator that spoken code word(s)/phrase(s) and/or firearm shot(s) have been detected by the system 100, but causes the communication device 340 to communicate to one or more entities or locations such as, but not by way of limitation, a police dispatcher, police, a taxi cab dispatcher; and/or a security system center that an emergency situation has occurred and information related to the emergency situation.

[0065] The communication device 340 may be any well-known communication device such as, but not by way of limitation, a dialer, a two-way radio (e.g., may be the same two-way radio or other communication device already used in the vehicle), a pager, a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet card), a communications port, a PCMCIA slot and card, a short-wave radio, etc. that may communicate voice, text, and/or video information to the one or more entities or locations. For example, the communication device 340 may be a dialer that dials one or more predetermined telephone numbers, pager numbers, wireless cellular or digital telephone numbers, and/or internet phone or device numbers for communicating a pre-recorded voice, text message, and/or video clip indicating that the graffiti-making act took place. The voice and/or text message may include one or more of the following: the location of the chauffeured vehicle (this may be determined by the automatic identification location device, e.g., GPS receiver, broadcasting mechanism 360), the type of emergency (e.g., firearm shot detected, robbery, flat tire, accident), and/or the time of the emergency.

[0066] As mentioned above, an image of the perpetrator and any words spoken by anyone in the chauffeured vehicle or sound activity may be recorded and viewed/listened to later and/or viewed/listened to during the emergency event. The ability to view/listen may be used as evidence for a later criminal proceeding, e.g., image of the perpetrator, recorded voice of the perpetrator.

[0067] The base unit 120 may be powered by the battery of the chauffeured vehicle and/or may be powered by one or more batteries 380 with the system 642.

[0068] An exemplary method of using the voice-recognition safety system 642 will now be described. The driver may train the voice-recognition safety system 642 by speaking one or more words or phrases that the driver wants the system 642 to remember as key word(s)/phrase(s) in the event of an emergency. The driver may also train the system 642 to remember different word(s)/phrase(s) for different types of emergencies (e.g., robbery, hijacking, accident, flat tire). If a speaker-independent process is used, this step will not be necessary because the keyword(s)/phrase(s) or a list of keyword(s)/phrase(s) will already come pre-recorded with the system 642. If the system 642 is to be operated generally in a sleep mode, the driver may train the system 642 by speaking one or more keyword(s)/phrase(s) for waking up the system. If the system 642 is to be operated in a continuous mode, one or more spoken words/phrases will not be required to wake up the system 642. The key word(s)/phrase(s) used to 1) awaken the system 642, and/or 2) actuate the alarm(s) 280 in the event of an emergency are recorded and stored in memory associated with the voice-recognition chip 644. As indicated above, the key word(s)/phrase(s) may be recorded and stored, i.e., pre-recorded and stored, at the factory, or by the consumer/user. If the key word(s)/phrase(s) are recorded by the driver, the driver may be prompted by the system 642 to perform this process.

[0069] In operation, when the driver faces an emergency situation such as an attempted robbery by a passenger, a hijacking, an accident, a flat tire, the user speaks the one or more key words or phrases. The microphone/sensor 110 transmits the signal(s) to the electronics 210. The voice-recognition chip 644 determines whether it recognizes the signal(s) as representing the key words or phrases indicative of an emergency. If the one or more key words or phrases are recognized, the alarm(s) 280 will be activated. The driver may speak different word(s)/phrase(s) for different types of emergencies (e.g., robbery, hijacking, accident, flat tire), which the system 642 may recognize and activate one or more different types of alarms 280. As indicated above, the alarm may include, but not by way of limitation, one or more of the following: one or more communication devices 340 or interfaces that place a communication with one or more entities (e.g., call to taxi cab dispatcher, police dispatcher, police); an infrared security video camera that records and/or monitors the perpetrator in the vehicle; a flash or non-flash camera (e.g., infrared camera) that captures one or more still images of the perpetrator; an audio recorder and/or microphone that records and/or listens in on sound activity in the vehicle, a disabling mechanism such as a mechanism that kills the engine or an automatic door-locking mechanism that locks at least one of the doors of the vehicle or maintains at least one of the doors in a locked condition; and one or more external emergency lights (preferably not viewable from inside the vehicle) that alert anyone in the vicinity of the chauffeured vehicle that the driver is having an emergency.

[0070] Preferably, the system 642 will automatically communicate with one or more entities/locations (e.g., police dispatcher, taxi cab dispatcher, police) that an emergency has been detected. If the system 642 is part of or connected with a communication device such as two-way radio, wireless phone, pager, or the like, the system 642 may communicate with the one or more entities using the existing communication device. The system 642 may include an automatic location identification device such as a GPS device for automatically identifying the location of the chauffeured vehicle. The system 642 may automatically report to the police dispatcher one or more of the following: an emergency was detected, the type of emergency detected, the vehicle (e.g., vehicle number) where the emergency occurred, the location of the vehicle, the time of the emergency.

[0071] As described above with respect to FIGS. 4A and 4B, if a firearm shot occurs, the system 642 may detect and automatically actuate the alarm(s) 280 in a similar manner. If the system automatically reports information on the emergency to one or more entities, this information may include one or more of the following: a firearm shot was detected, the vehicle (e.g., vehicle number) where the firearm shot occurred, the location of the vehicle, the time of the firearm shot, the number of firearm shots detected, and/or the type of firearm shot.

[0072] The voice-recognition safety system 642 is advantageous over systems such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,841,277 in that the system 642 automatically communicates to police, a police dispatcher, taxi cab dispatcher that an emergency occurred upon detection of a spoken key word by the driver as opposed to relying on a passerby to report an emergency, especially when the emergency lights on a vehicle in the '277 patent are likely to be mistaken for hazard lights, which are often used by taxi cab drivers when stopping, standing, dropping off a passenger or picking a passenger up. Voice-recognition is also a more accurate way to trigger an alarm than the foot switch described in the '277 patent. Such a foot switch is likely to be accidentally actuated during normal use of the vehicle. The system 642 is easier to install than the system described in the '277 patent because of all the different elements that have to be installed all over the automobile in the '277 system. Installation of the '277 system requires a foot switch to be installed in the floorboard, lights to be installed on the front and rear of the vehicle, and a control apparatus to be installed under the hood, in the engine compartment. Voice-recognition also allows different types of emergencies to be easily indicated are reported using different keywords/phrases. The additional firearm shot detection aspect of the system 642 is advantageous because the alarm 280 is actuated in the event of an emergency situation even though the driver didn't say code word(s)/phrase(s).

[0073] IV. Voice-Recognition Safety System for Aircraft

[0074] Although the voice-recognition safety system 642 described above has been described as being used with a chauffeured vehicle, the safety system 642 may be used with an aircraft such as a commercial airplane. For example, as mentioned above in the Background of the Invention, the terrorist attacks that occurred on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. have revealed that terrorists have found an almost perfect weapon in a hijacked aircraft, especially if the terrorists are suicidal. The voice-recognition safety system 642 may be used to lock out the controls of an aircraft, putting the aircraft in an automatic-pilot mode and/or ground-control mode, in the event of a hijacking. As described above, the one or more sensors 110 may serve as one or more microphones that pick up one or more spoken words/phrases by the driver, in this case, the pilot. As used herein, “pilot” means the pilot, the co-pilot, and/or anyone else that normally is in the cockpit of an aircraft during flight, such as a flight attendant or other host. In addition, the spoken words/phrases could be uttered by non-airline personnel including passengers or the highjackers themselves. Examples of spoken words/phrases include key words such as “terrorists,” “attack,” “highjack,” “gun,” “bomb,” “knife,” “weapon,” “hand grenade” as well as possible screams and curses in various dialects. The electronics 210, which may include one or more of the components shown in FIG. 5 such as the voice-recognition chip 644, determines whether any spoken words by the pilot/co-pilot match one or more pre-recorded or stored code words or phrases. Likewise, the electronics 210 may determine whether a firearm shot is detected on the aircraft. If one or more code words/phrases and/or one or more firearm shots are detected by the electronics 210, one or more alarms 280 may be actuated.

[0075] The alarm(s) 280 actuated after a spoken code word and/or a firearm shot has been detected may include, but not by way of limitation, one or more of the following: one or more communication devices 340 or interfaces place a communication with one or more entities such as air-traffic control at the nearest airport/major airport; a disabling mechanism locks out one or more cockpit controls (e.g., all or substantially all of the cockpit controls may be locked out, eliminating control from the aircraft itself); an automatic-pilot mechanism puts the aircraft in automatic-pilot mode, a ground-control mechanism allows the aircraft to be controlled from a remote location such as from the ground (e.g., from air-traffic control); a security camera such as an infrared security video camera records and/or monitors activity in the cockpit and/or cabin; a flash or non-flash camera (e.g., infrared camera) captures one or more still images of activity in the cockpit and/or cabin; a microphone and/or audio recorder listens in on or records sound activity in the cockpit and/or cabin.

[0076] The communication device 340 may be any well-known communication device such as, but not by way of limitation, a dialer, a two-way radio (e.g., may be the same two-way radio or other communication device already used in the aircraft), a pager, a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet card), a communications port, a PCMCIA slot and card, a short-wave radio, etc. that may communicate voice, text, and/or video information to the one or more entities or locations. For example, the communication device 340 may be a dialer that dials one or more predetermined telephone numbers, pager numbers, wireless cellular or digital telephone numbers, and/or internet phone or device numbers for communicating a pre-recorded voice, text message, and/or video clip indicating that a hijacking or other emergency event on the aircraft occurred. The voice and/or text message may include one or more of the following: the location of the aircraft (this may be determined by the automatic identification location device, e.g., GPS receiver, broadcasting mechanism 360), the type of emergency (e.g., hijacking, engine out), and/or the time of the emergency.

[0077] In a preferred embodiment, when the electronics of the system 642 detects one or more spoken code word(s)/phrase(s) and/or firearm shots, the system 642 causes the cockpit controls to be locked out, eliminating control of the aircraft from the cockpit, and puts the aircraft in automatic-pilot mode. In another embodiment, the aircraft may be controlled from the ground (e.g., from air traffic control) or another remote location once the cockpit controls are locked out in addition to the automatic-pilot mode or instead of the automatic-pilot mode. Whether in a remote/ground-control mode or automatic-pilot mode, the aircraft may be safety landed at an airport, avoiding intentional crashes into structures by suicidal hijackers.

[0078] V. Vehicle Tire Leak Detection System

[0079] With reference to FIG. 6, another application of the detection system will now be described. A detection system 700 similar to the detection system 100 described above may be used to detect a tire leak 710 from a tire 725 of a vehicle 720 such as a truck 730 and/or trailer 740 and initiate an alarm in response thereto. A damaged or blown tire 725 can be a dangerous hazard for the driver of a vehicle 720 and/or other drivers on the road in the vicinity of the vehicle. For example, a blown tire from a large truck can cause the truck to swerve erratically and jackknife. Not only is this dangerous for the driver and any passengers of the truck, but it poses a real hazard to surrounding vehicles. The swerving truck may collide with other vehicles on the road or may cause vehicles to swerve, increasing the probability of one or more vehicle accidents. Further, if the blown tire remains on the road, vehicles may swerve to miss the tire or may collide with the tire, increasing the probability of additional vehicle accidents.

[0080] A blown or severely damaged tire usually results from a small hole or tear in the tire 725. This small hole or tear usually emits a leaking noise 710 caused by compressed air escaping the small hole or tear in the tire 725. If a vehicle driver and/or dispatcher, e.g., truck dispatcher, knew of a tire leak 710 in one of the tires 725 of the vehicle 720, the driver could have the tire repaired, replaced, or take the necessary precautions. Thus, the inventors of the vehicle tire leak detection system 700 and method recognized that such a system and method could detect whether a tire leak 710 had occurred and alert the vehicle driver and/or dispatcher accordingly.

[0081] The tire leak detection system 700 includes a base unit 750 and one or more sensors 760. Instead of the one or more sensors 110 and/or base unit 120 described above with respect to FIGS. 1-3 being configured to detect whether the sound signature of a graffiti-making act occurred, the one or more sensors 760 and/or base unit 750 may detect whether the sound signature of a tire leak 710 occurred.

[0082] It should be noted, the one or more sensors 760 and/or base unit 750 may determine whether a tire 725 is going flat by detecting sounds indicative of a tire going flat other than a tire leak 710. For example, as a tire 725 goes flat, a unique noise may be made as the tire 725 contacts the road, e.g., the tire may make a slapping sound of a detectable characteristic frequency or frequencies. This sound or other sounds may be the basis of determining whether a tire 725 is going flat.

[0083] The base unit 750 may be mounted to the vehicle 720 in a strategic location such as, but not by way of limitation, a rear side 770 of a cab 780 if the vehicle 720 is a truck or somewhere on a chassis 790 of the vehicle 720. Similarly, the one or more sensors 760 may be mounted to the vehicle 720 in a strategic location such as, but not by way of limitation, on the chassis 790 of the vehicle 720, adjacent the tires 725. As described above, the one or more sensors 760 may be integral with the base unit 750 or separate therefrom. Because the tire leak detection system 700 is so similar in construction to the graffiti detection system 100 described above, further details as to the construction or structure of the tire leak detection system 700 will not be described in additional detail. The discussion above with respect to the construction of the graffiti detection system 100 is equally applicable to the tire leak detection system 700, and is thereby incorporated by reference.

[0084] An embodiment of a method of using the tire leak detection system 700 will now be described. It is common for the tire 725 of a vehicle 720 to become damaged during normal use by sharp objects such a nails, glass, etc. A cut or hole in the tire 725 caused by the sharp object may cause a leak 710. The tire leak 710 is a precursor to further tire damage, and a potential multiple vehicle accident, as described above. The tire leak 710 emits sound waves having a characteristic sound signature frequency or frequency pattern. The tire leak 710 may have a unique sound signature frequency or frequency pattern for different types of leaks, at different tire pressures, for different types of tires, etc.

[0085] The one or more sensors 760 convert the sound from the tire leak 710 into an electronic signal or electronic signals that are processed by the electronics 210 in the base unit 750 to determine whether the electronic signal(s) represent one or more different types of tire leaks. If it is determined that the electronic signal(s) represents a tire leak, one or more alarms are initiated. The one or more alarms may include one or more of the alarms described above with respect to the graffiti detection system 100 and method. Preferably, the one or more alarms include a communication to the driver of the vehicle 720 alerting the driver that a tire leak 710 has been detected. If the vehicle 720 is a large truck 730 and/or trailer 740, an additional alarm may include a communication to a truck dispatcher alerting the dispatcher that a tire leak 710 has been detected.

[0086] Similar to the detection system 100 described above, the tire leak detection system 700 may include an automatic location identification device such as a GPS device for identifying the location of the tire leak detection system 700, and, hence, the location of the vehicle.

[0087] Reported information to the driver and/or dispatcher may include, but not by way of limitation, a tire leak has been detected, the time of the tire leak, the wheel that the leak is from, the location of the vehicle, and/or the type of tire leak. Thus, the tire leak detection system 700 detects the sound of one or more tire leaks 710 of a vehicle 720, and automatically alerts the driver and/or the dispatcher in response thereto.

[0088] VI. Equipment Use Detection System

[0089] With reference to FIG. 7, another application of the detection system will now be described. Problems can occur as a result of conduct or acts that cause the emission of a sound of a characteristic frequency or frequencies. If the conduct or act could be detected and reported immediately, the frequency of the resulting problem may be eliminated or reduced. An exemplary scenario is the unauthorized use by an unauthorized co-worker or other individual 800 of an authorized individual's equipment. A detection system 810 similar to the detection system 100 described above may be used to detect a sound or other characteristic 820 indicative of the use of equipment 830 such as a computer, cash register, copy machine or any other equipment one wishes to protect or prevent the unauthorized use of and initiate an alarm in response thereto.

[0090] During operation or use of equipment 830, especially electronic equipment, one or more sounds or other characteristics 810 occur that indicate the equipment 830 is being used. Examples include, but not by way of limitation, one or more beeps from a computer upon start-up, the ring of a cash register when a the register drawer is opened, the humming of a fan or hard drive in a computer, the transmittance of signals in a computer, the typing on a computer keyboard, the dialing or connecting sound of a facsimile machine, and the noise emitted during the scanning step of a copy machine. If an authorized individual, employer, etc. knew the equipment 830 was being used without authorization, the necessary precautions, remedial action, etc. could be taken. Thus, the inventors of the equipment use detection system 810 and method recognized that such a system and method could detect whether one or more sounds or other characteristics 820 indicative of equipment use had occurred and alert the authorized individual, employer, etc. accordingly.

[0091] The equipment use detection system 810 includes a base unit 840 and one or more sensors 850. Instead of the one or more sensors 110 and/or base unit 120 described above with respect to FIGS. 1-3 being configured to detect whether the sound signature of a graffiti-making act occurred, the one or more sensors 850 and/or base unit 840 may detect whether one or more sounds or other characteristics 810 indicative of equipment use occurred.

[0092] The base unit 840 and one or more sensors 850 (if the one or more sensors 850 are separate from the base unit 840) are preferably mounted in one or more strategic locations that are inconspicuous and where they are not likely to be tampered with or damaged. In one embodiment, the base unit 840 and one or more sensors 850 are not connected directly to the equipment 830 being monitored, inhibiting the unauthorized individual 800 from spotting the equipment. The base unit 840 could be mounted on a wall 860, under a desk or table 870, or any other strategic location. As described above, the one or more sensors 850 may be integral with the base unit 840 or separate therefrom. Because the equipment use detection system 810 is so similar in construction to the graffiti detection system 100 described above, further details as to the construction or structure of the equipment use detection system 810 will not be described in additional detail. The discussion above with respect to the construction of the graffiti detection system 100 is equally applicable to the equipment use detection system 810, and is thereby incorporated by reference.

[0093] An embodiment of a method of using the equipment use detection system 810 will now be described. The equipment 830 may emit sound waves 820 having a characteristic sound signature frequency or frequency pattern. Different types of equipment use may cause different sounds having a unique sound signature frequency or frequency pattern. Further, the same type of equipment 830 may emit different sounds indicative of equipment use.

[0094] The one or more sensors 850 may include one or more sonic sensors that convert the sound from the equipment use into an electronic signal or electronic signals that are processed by the electronics 210 in the base unit 840 to determine whether the electronic signal(s) represent one or more different types of equipment use. If it is determined that the electronic signal(s) represents equipment use, one or more alarms are initiated. The one or more alarms may include one or more of the alarms described above with respect to the graffiti detection system 100 and method. Preferably, the one or more alarms include a communication to the authorized individual, the employer, security, police, etc. indicating that equipment use has been detected. An additional type of alarm that may be initiated if, for example, the equipment 830 is electronic is an automatic shut-down mechanism that shuts down, e.g., cuts power to, the equipment 830.

[0095] Similar to the detection system 100 described above, the equipment use detection system 810 may include an automatic location identification device such as a GPS device for identifying the location of the equipment use detection system 810. Such an automatic location identification device may be desirable if the equipment is of a mobile nature such as an automobile.

[0096] Reported information to the authorized individual, the employer, security, police, etc. may include, but not by way of limitation, an equipment use has been detected, the time of the equipment use, the type of equipment use, and/or the location of the equipment use. Thus, the equipment use detection system 810 detects the use of one or more different types of equipment use, and automatically alerts the authorized individual, the employer, security, police, etc. in response thereto.

[0097] The detection system 810 may be used to detect the use of electronic and non-electronic equipment 830. Further, the one or more sensors 850 may include one or more types of sensors other than sonic sensors that detect use of the equipment other than through detection of an emitted sound. For example, the one or more sensors could determine that a carbon monoxide detector has been actuated and communicate this to one or more entities in the manner described above.

[0098] In another scenario, instead of the detection system 810 detecting and reporting the act of equipment use, the detection system 810 may detect and report other acts such as the conduct of a baby crying. With more and more parents becoming full-time working parents, the need for baby or childcare has increased dramatically in recent years. One of the biggest concerns of parents who have hired full or part-time baby or childcare is that their baby or child be treated properly by the childcare. This has been an increasing concern in recent times with the numerous reports of nannies severely abusing babies. In another embodiment, the detection system 810 may be adapted to detect and report an act of interest such as the crying of a baby. The one or more sensors 850 may pick up the characteristic frequency or frequencies or a baby's cry and the base unit 840 may process the signal(s) to determine if the signal(s) correspond to a baby's cry, and, if so, initiate one or more alarms. One alarm may be communicating to one or both of the parents that the baby is crying. This communication may be made by any well-known manner, e.g., e-mail, page, telephone call, cellphone call, videophone call, etc. The parent(s) could then check on the baby's condition by, for example, contacting the hired childcare, viewing a video image of the baby transmitted by the communication or by other means, etc.

[0099] Although the detection system has been described in conjunction with detecting a graffiti-making act, a firearm shot, a vehicle tire leak, and an act or conduct such as equipment use and the crying of a baby, and actuating an alarm in response thereto, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the detection system described above may be used in other applications such as, but not by way of limitation.

[0100] While preferred methods and embodiments have been shown and described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that numerous alterations may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the invention is not to be limited except in accordance with the following claims.

Claims

1. A method of detecting an emergency situation in an aircraft, comprising: providing in an aircraft a voice-recognition safety system for detecting an emergency situation in an aircraft, the voice-recognition safety system including one or more sensors to pick up one or more spoken words or phrases of an aircraft pilot in an aircraft and transmit one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft; and a base unit including electronics to process the one or more signals and the electronics adapted to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft; and an alarm to indicate that an emergency situation has been detected in the aircraft; sensing with the one or more sensors one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft and transmitting one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases to the electronics; processing the one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft with the electronics and determining whether the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft; initiating an alarm indicating that an emergency situation took place if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more sensors include one or more microphones.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more microphones are one or more omni-directional microphones.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more microphones are one or more directional microphones.
5. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more microphones are separate from the base unit.
6. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more microphones are integral with the base unit.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein initiating an alarm includes communicating with air traffic control that an emergency situation has taken place.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein initiating an alarm includes communicating to one or more entities one or more of the following: the location of the aircraft, the identity of the aircraft, the type of emergency, and the time of the emergency.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein initiating an alarm includes performing one or more of the following steps: locking out one or more controls in a cockpit of the aircraft, putting the aircraft on automatic pilot, allowing the aircraft to be controlled from a remote location, recording an image of a perpetrator in the aircraft with a camera, and recording sound in the aircraft with a voice recorder.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronics include a voice-recognition chip for determining if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more sensors are one or more sonic sensors adapted to sonically sense a firearm shot and transmit one or more signals in response to the firearm shot, the electronics are adapted to process the one or more signals in response to the firearm shot to determine if the one or more signals represent a firearm shot, and the alarm is adapted to be activated in the event that a firearm shot is detected.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein initiating an alarm includes communicating to one or more entities one or more of the following: a firearm shot has been detected, the type of firearm shot, the aircraft that the firearm shot was detected in, the location of the aircraft, and the time the firearm shot was detected.
13. The method of claim 1, further including training the electronics to learn one or more key words or phrases representative of an emergency situation.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein training the electronics includes training the electronics during manufacturing, and using speaker-independent recognition to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein training the electronics includes having the aircraft pilot train the electronics to learn one or more custom key words or phrases representative of an emergency situation provided by the aircraft pilot, and using speaker-dependent recognition to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft.
16. A voice-recognition safety system for detecting an emergency situation in an aircraft, comprising: one or more sensors to pick up one or more spoken words or phrases of an aircraft pilot in an aircraft and transmit one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases of the aircraft pilot in the aircraft; and a base unit including electronics to process the one or more signals and the electronics adapted to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft, and an alarm to indicate that an emergency situation has been detected in the aircraft.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein one or more sensors include one or more microphones.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein the one or more microphones are one or more omni-directional microphones.
19. The system of claim 17, wherein the one or more microphones are one or more directional microphones.
20. The system of claim 17, wherein the one or more microphones are separate from the base unit.
21. The system of claim 17, wherein the one or more microphones are integral with the base unit.
22. The system of claim 16, wherein the alarm includes a communication device adapted to communicate with air traffic control that an emergency situation has taken place.
23. The system of claim 16, wherein the alarm includes a communication device adapted to communicate to one or more entities one or more of the following: the location of the aircraft, the identity of the aircraft, the type of emergency, and the time of the emergency.
24. The system of claim 16, wherein the alarm is adapted to perform one or more of the following steps: locking out one or more controls in a cockpit of the aircraft, putting the aircraft on automatic pilot, allowing the aircraft to be controlled from a remote location, recording an image of a perpetrator in the aircraft with a camera, and recording sound in the aircraft with a voice recorder.
25. The system of claim 16, wherein the electronics include a voice-recognition chip to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft.
26. The system of claim 16, wherein the one or more sensors are one or more sonic sensors adapted to sonically sense a firearm shot and transmit one or more signals in response to the firearm shot, the electronics are adapted to process the one or more signals in response to the firearm shot to determine if the one or more signals represent a firearm shot, and the alarm is adapted to be activated in the event that a firearm shot is detected.
27. The system of claim 26, wherein the alarm is adapted to communicate to one or more entities one or more of the following: a firearm shot has been detected, the type of firearm shot, the aircraft that the firearm shot was detected in, the location of the aircraft, and the time the firearm shot was detected.
28. The system of claim 16, wherein the electronics are adapted to be trained to learn one or more key words or phrases representative of an emergency situation.
29. The system of claim 16, wherein the electronics are adapted to be trained during manufacturing and are adapted to use speaker-independent recognition to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft.
30. The system of claim 16, wherein the electronics are adapted to be trained by an aircraft pilot to learn one or more custom key words or phrases representative of an emergency situation and are adapted to use speaker-dependent recognition to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the aircraft.
31. A voice-recognition safety system for detecting an emergency situation in a vehicle, comprising: one or more sensors to pick up one or more spoken words or phrases of a vehicle operator in a vehicle and transmit one or more signals in response to the one or more spoken words or phrases of the vehicle operator in the vehicle; and a base unit including electronics to process the one or more signals and the electronics adapted to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the vehicle, and an alarm to indicate that an emergency situation has been detected in the vehicle.
32. The system of claim 31, wherein one or more sensors include one or more microphones.
33. The system of claim 32, wherein the one or more microphones are one or more omni-directional microphones.
34. The system of claim 32, wherein the one or more microphones are one or more directional microphones.
35. The system of claim 32, wherein the one or more microphones are separate from the base unit.
36. The system of claim 32, wherein the one or more microphones are integral with the base unit.
37. The system of claim 32, wherein the alarm includes a communication device adapted to communicate with a traffic controller that an emergency situation has taken place.
38. The system of claim 31, wherein the alarm includes a communication device adapted to communicate to one or more entities one or more of the following: the location of the vehicle, the identity of the vehicle, the type of emergency, and the time of the emergency.
39. The system of claim 31, wherein the alarm is adapted to perform one or more of the following steps: locking out one or more controls of the vehicle, putting the vehicle on automatic pilot, allowing the vehicle to be controlled from a remote location, recording an image of a perpetrator in the vehicle with a camera, and recording sound in the vehicle with a voice recorder.
40. The system of claim 31, wherein the electronics include a voice-recognition chip to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the vehicle.
41. The system of claim 31, wherein the one or more sensors are one or more sonic sensors adapted to sonically sense a firearm shot and transmit one or more signals in response to the firearm shot, the electronics are adapted to process the one or more signals in response to the firearm shot to determine if the one or more signals represent a firearm shot, and the alarm is adapted to be activated in the event that a firearm shot is detected.
42. The system of claim 41, wherein the alarm is adapted to communicate to one or more entities one or more of the following: a firearm shot has been detected, the type of firearm shot, the vehicle that the firearm shot was detected in, the location of the vehicle, and the time the firearm shot was detected.
43. The system of claim 31, wherein the electronics are adapted to be trained to learn one or more key words or phrases representative of an emergency situation.
44. The system of claim 31, wherein the electronics are adapted to be trained during manufacturing and are adapted to use speaker-independent recognition to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the vehicle.
45. The system of claim 31, wherein the electronics are adapted to be trained by a vehicle operator to learn one or more custom key words or phrases representative of an emergency situation and are adapted to use speaker-dependent recognition to determine if the one or more signals represent one or more code words or phrases representative of an emergency situation in the vehicle.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/908,309, filed Jul. 17, 2001, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/588,863, filed Jun. 6, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,643 and claims priority to the following U.S. Provisional Applications: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/137,962 entitled “Graffiti Detection System,” filed Jun. 7, 1999; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/180,771 entitled “Olfactory Detection of Graffiti,” filed Feb. 7, 2000; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/194,082 entitled “Acoustical Detection of Firearm,” filed Apr. 3, 2000.

Provisional Applications (3)

Number	Date	Country
60137962	Jun 1999	US
60180771	Feb 2000	US
60194082	Apr 2000	US

Continuations (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	09588863	Jun 2000	US
Child	09908309	Jul 2001	US

Continuation in Parts (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	09908309	Jul 2001	US
Child	10028012	Dec 2001	US

Voice-recognition safety system for aircraft and method of using the same

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

US Classifications