This invention relates to signal receivers for Wireless Communications or for Wired Communications.
Wireless communications signal receivers are widely used in many systems such as e.g. radio or TV broadcasting, mobile phones, wireless LAN networks or Bluetooth networks. Similarly, Wired communications signal receivers are widely used, e.g. in the fields of digital telephone line communications (ISDN, ADSL), cable TV communications (DOCSIS) or optical communications (PON, under-sea cables). Production quantities of such devices amount to over one billion units per year. It is therefore not surprising that ever-continuing efforts are made to reduce the production cost of these devices.
Thanks to a continuing increase in transistor density of microelectronics Integrated Circuits, the cost of Digital electronic functions decreases year after year. Therefore, there is a continuous search for reducing the amount of Analog circuits at the expense of an increased amount of Digital functions. A modern communications receiver typically contains i) an analog frontend that amplifies and conditions analog signals, ii) a set of Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADC) and iii) Digital circuits that treat the signals in the digital domain.
As stated above, it is generally advantageous to reduce the content of blocks i) and ii), even if this requires an increase of the complexity and cost of block iii).
A State-of-the-art Wireless signal receiver is depicted in
There is a strive to reducing the complexity of this system. In an ideal situation, the Wireless input signal would be immediately applied to an Analog-to-Digital Converter, as depicted in
An intermediate approach is shown in
For example, consider the requirements of a Wireless-LAN system, also known as WiFi or IEEE802.11. The maximum peak input signal amplitude for this system is −20 dBm while the noise floor is at −101 dBm. If we allow for a noise degradation by the Analog-to-Digital Converters of 0.5 dB, the noise added by the Analog-to-Digital Converters has to be lower than −110 dBm. This means, a dynamic range of 90 dB. On the other hand, the Analog-to-Digital Converters have to sample the input signal at a sampling rate of at least 200 MHz, in order to process out-of-band blockers with frequencies of up to 100 MHz. The State-of-the-Art does not allow realising such Analog-to-Digital Converters within the power budget or within the cost target for such functions.
For some Wireline communications receivers, the situation is similar. E.g. the block schematics of
The invention aims at further reducing the analog part of Wireless or Wireline communications signal receivers.
The invention is mainly based on two novel principles:
Similar considerations are valid for some Wired communications devices.
All these principles will be detailed further down.
In
In
The invention makes use of a VCO-based Analog-to-Digital Converter. Such a Converter is already described in the State-of-the-art [1-3], but we repeat here the description, for a better understanding of the explanations further on:
In a VCO-based Converter (see
It is sometimes easier to measure the Phase of the VCO, rather than its frequency. In such a case, a Phase meter (12) provides this Phase information (13). Taking the difference between the phases at two consecutive ticks of a reference clock yields a digital representation of the VCO's frequency and hence a digital representation (11) of the analog input signal.
A common realisation of such VCO-based Analog-to-Digital Converter is shown in
The oscillator's phase is measured with a resolution of one inverter's delay. In a modern CMOS silicon technology, inverter delays in the order of 10 psec. can be realised. Thanks to this precise measurement, this Analog-to-Digital Converter offers a low-noise performance. SNR of 90 dB over a 10-MHz bandwidth can be reached with a power consumption of a few mA. The SNR improves when reducing the inverter's delay or when increasing the reference clock frequency. Furthermore, SNR improves when the slope of the Voltage-to-Frequency characteristic is increased.
The main drawback of this type of Analog-to-Digital Converter is its nonlinearity: the linearity is only as good as the linearity of the Voltage-to-Frequency characteristic of the VCO. An example of such a characteristic is depicted in
This main drawback can be improved by means of the circuit of
Vin,1=Vbias+Vsignal (expression 1)
and
Vin,2=Vbias−Vsignal (expression 2)
As a result, the frequency difference between the two oscillators depends on Vsignal. The resulting input-to-frequency characteristic is shown in
This approach offers several advantages:
a) The output can now be positive as well as negative. It is centered around zero: when Vsignal is zero, the output is zero.
b) The resulting input-to-output characteristic is symmetrical around zero.
c) The output signal swing is twice as large.
d) Most important: the resulting input-to-output characteristic is more linear. This can be observed from
A second improvement on the VCO-based Analog-to-Digital Converter is shown in
Thanks to the improvements to the VCO-based Analog-to-Digital Converter as described above, this block schematic meets the linearity and SNR requirements of common Wireless Communications systems such as GSM, LTE, WiFi, WiMAX, Bluetooth and others.
With some modifications on the block schematic, the same VCO-based Analog-to-Digital Converter can be used for Wireline communications standards. In general, it is advantageous in situations where the SNR requirements are more stringent than the SNDR requirements.
It should be well understood that the drawings and embodiments presented in this document are given for explanatory purposes, and that other embodiments of the principles of the invention may exist.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/BE2009/000046 | 8/28/2009 | WO | 00 | 2/27/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/022789 | 3/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5189420 | Eddy et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
6396890 | Turner | May 2002 | B1 |
6809676 | Younis et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7173501 | Varricchione | Feb 2007 | B1 |
8283984 | Lin | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20070229118 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20120087420 | Kim | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Authority/European Patent Office (ISA/EP). International Search Report, Application No. PCT/BE09/00046. Aug. 17, 2010. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority/European Patent Office (IPEA/EP). International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/BE09/00046. Sep. 26, 2011. |
Høvin, Mats, et al. “Delta-Sigma Modulators Using Frequency-Modulated Intermediate Values.” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 13-22 (Jan. 1997). |
Park, Matt, et al. “A 0.13 μm CMOS 78dB SNDR 87 mW 20 MHz BW CT ΔΣ ADC with VCO-Based Integrator and Quantizer.” Solid-State Circuits Conference—Digest of Technical Papers, 2009, pp. 170-171, 171a. ISSCC 2009. IEEE International. Presented at 2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 10, 2009. |
Watanabe, Takamoto, et al. “An All-Digital Analog-to-Digital Converter With 12-μV/LSB Using Moving Average Filtering.” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 120-125 (Jan. 2003). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120154192 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |