The invention can be more fully understood by reading the subsequent detailed description and examples with references made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a and 3b show embodiments of auto-latch circuits in the voltage converter 200a;
a to 4f show embodiments of pulling circuits coupled to the output terminal of level shifter 100; and
a to 5f show embodiments of pulling circuits coupled to the complementary output terminal of level shifter 100.
The following description is of the best-contemplated mode of carrying out the invention. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention and should not be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the invention is best determined by reference to the appended claims.
a and 3b show embodiments of auto-latch circuits in the voltage converter 200a. In
b shows a similar case using the complementary output terminal of level shifter 300b. In a conventional solution a first inverter 108 is coupled to the complementary output terminal A for output of a converted signal. An inverter 310 is added to form a latch circuit with the first inverter 108. Normally, the first inverter 108 outputs a converted signal to the second terminal V2 while the latching effect of inverter 310 is weaker. When voltage at the first terminal V1 becomes unstable, signals maintained by the inverter 310 override signals generated by the transistors M1 and M3, and the latest status on the second terminal V2 is latched and output as a substitution signal.
a to 4f show embodiments of pulling circuits coupled to the output terminal of level shifter 400a. In
b shows an embodiment of the pulling circuit 410 implemented by a PMOS in which, the gate is grounded, and the source and drain are individually coupled to supply voltage VCC and the output terminal B. This arrangement tends to constantly pull the voltage at the output terminal B to the supply voltage VCC. To make the POMS weaker, the PMOS is implemented by a long channel device, such that when in normal operation, the voltage at the output terminal B is dominated by the transistors M2 and M4. When the input of level shifter 400a is floated, the voltage at the output terminal B is pulled to supply voltage VCC by the pulling circuit 410.
c shows an embodiment of the pulling circuit 410 implemented by a capacitor, with two terminals thereof coupled to the output terminal B and the supply voltage VCC. When the input of the level shifter 400a is floating, the transistor M2 and M4 are too weak to control the output terminal B with a strong driving capability. Subsequently, the output terminal B is charged (through M2) to a voltage level near VCC. Thus, the output terminal B is at a high state (logic 1). In this situation, the capacitor C has an effect to keep the output terminal B high and the voltage level of the terminal B is irrelevant to the floating input of the level shifter 400a. To make the capacitor weaker, the capacitor is designed to be small, such that when in normal operation, voltage at the output terminal B is dominated by transistors M2 and M4. When the input of level shifter 400a is floated, the voltage at the output terminal B is pulled to the supply voltage VCC by the pulling circuit 410.
In
e shows an embodiment of the pulling circuit 420 implemented by a NMOS in which, the gate is coupled to the supply voltage VCC, and the source and drain are individually coupled to ground and the output terminal B. This arrangement tends to constantly pull the voltage at output terminal B to ground. To make the NMOS weaker, the NMOS is implemented by a long channel device such that when in normal operation, voltage at the output terminal B is dominated by transistors M2 and M4. When the input of level shifter 400b is floated, the voltage at the output terminal B is pulled to ground by the pulling circuit 420.
f shows another embodiment of the pulling circuit 420 implemented by a capacitor, with two terminals thereof coupled to the output terminal B and ground. When the input of the level shifter 400b is floating, the transistor M2 and M4 are too weak to control the output terminal B with a strong driving capability. Subsequently, the output terminal B is discharged (through M4) to a voltage level near GND (ground). Thus, the output terminal B is at a low state (logic 0). In this situation, the capacitor C has an effect to keep the output terminal B low and the voltage level of the terminal B is irrelevant to the floating input of the level shifter 400b. To make the capacitor weaker, the capacitor is designed to be small, such that when in normal operation, voltage at the output terminal B is dominated by transistors M2 and M4. When the input of level shifter 400b is floated, the voltage at the output terminal B is pulled to ground by the pulling circuit 420. The pulling circuits 410 and 420 are not limited to be the described capacitor or NMOS/PMOS, however, they can be any circuit capable of pulling the voltage to a predetermined level irrelevant to voltage at the first terminal V1.
a to 5f show embodiments of pulling circuits coupled to the complementary output terminal A of the level shifter 500a. Since voltage at the complementary output terminal A is an inversion of the input at first terminal V1, a first inverter 108 is coupled to the complementary output terminal A to reverse the voltage and output a converted signal at the second terminal V2. The pulling circuit 510 is designed to be weak, tending to pull the voltage at the complementary output terminal A to a predetermined level. Similar to the embodiment described in
b shows an embodiment of the pulling circuit 510 implemented by a PMOS. In which, the gate is grounded, and the source and drain are individually coupled to supply voltage VCC and the complementary output terminal A. This arrangement tends to constantly pull the voltage at the complementary output terminal A to supply voltage VCC. To make the PMOS weaker, the PMOS is implemented by a long channel device, such that when in normal operation, voltage at the complementary output terminal A is dominated by M1 and M3. When the input of level shifter 500a is floated, the voltage at the complementary output terminal A is pulled to supply voltage VCC by the pulling circuit 510. Through the first inverter 108, a ground signal is output to second terminal V2 as a substitution signal.
c shows an embodiment of the pulling circuit 510 implemented by a capacitor, with two terminals thereof coupled to the complementary output terminal A and the supply voltage VCC. When the input of the level shifter 500a is floating, the transistor M1 and M3 are too weak to control the output terminal A with a strong driving capability. Subsequently, the output terminal A is charged (through M1) to a voltage level near VCC. Thus, the output terminal A is at a high state (logic 1). In this situation, the capacitor C has an effect to keep the output terminal A high and the voltage level of the terminal A is irrelevant to the floating input of the level shifter 500a. To make the capacitor weaker, the capacitor is designed to be small, such that when in normal operation, voltage at the complementary output terminal A is dominated by transistors M1 and M3. When the input of level shifter 500a is floated, the voltage at the complementary output terminal A is pulled to supply voltage VCC by the pulling circuit 510. Similarly, a ground signal is output to the second terminal V2 as a substitution signal through the first inverter 108.
In
e shows an embodiment of the pulling circuit 520 implemented by a NMOS. In which, the gate is coupled to the supply voltage VCC, and the source and drain are individually coupled to ground and the complementary output terminal A. This arrangement tends to constantly pull the voltage at the complementary output terminal A to ground. To make the NMOS weaker, the NMOS is implemented by a long channel device, such that when in normal operation, voltage at the complementary output terminal A is dominated by transistors M1 and M3. When the input of level shifter 500b is floated, the voltage at the complementary output terminal A is pulled to ground by the pulling circuit 520.
f shows another embodiment of the pulling circuit 520 implemented by a capacitor, with two terminals thereof coupled to the complementary output terminal A and ground. When the input of the level shifter 500b is floating, the transistor M1 and M3 are too weak to control the output terminal A with a strong driving capability. Subsequently, the output terminal A is discharged (through M3) to a voltage level near GND (ground). Thus, the output terminal A is at a low state (logic 0). In this situation, the capacitor C has an effect to keep the output terminal A low and the voltage level of the terminal A is irrelevant to the floating input of the level shifter 500b. To make the capacitor weaker, the capacitor is designed to be small, such that when in normal operation, voltage at the complementary output terminal A is dominated by transistors M1 and M3. When the input of level shifter 500b is floated, the voltage at the complementary output terminal A is pulled to ground by the pulling circuit 520. The pulling circuits 510 and 520 are not limited to be the described capacitor or NMOS/PMOS, to the contrary, they can be any circuit capable of pulling the voltage to a predetermined level irrelevant to the input at the first terminal V1.
The level shifters in the embodiments can be uni-directional or bi-directional, and the implementation thereof is not limited to the described embodiments. The second isolation circuit 204 can be identical to the isolation circuit 202, thus, redundant descriptions are omitted. With the auto-isolation function implemented in the level shifters, a SOC achieves higher quality and performance with lower cost.
While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. To the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements (as would be apparent to those skilled in the art). Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/805480, filed Jun. 22, 2006.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60805480 | Jun 2006 | US |