The present invention relates to voltage regulators.
A low voltage drop over the voltage regulator is achieved by the use of a MOSFET as a voltage regulating element together with a charge pump providing a sufficiently high gate potential which has to be higher than the output voltage of the voltage regulator, in the case of a low drop regulator even higher than the input voltage of the voltage regulator.
In order to guarantee a substantially constant output voltage, the gate of the voltage regulating MOSFET (e.g. a power MOSFET) is supplied with a bias current provided by a charge pump and controlled by a closed loop control system. That is, the output voltage of the voltage regulator is received by a controller which controls the gate current (and therefore the gate voltage) of the voltage regulating MOSFET such, that the output voltage of the voltage regulator remains substantially constant.
In response to an upward step of the load current (i.e. the output current) the output voltage will slightly drop due to the higher voltage drop over the voltage regulating MOSFET. Triggered by this voltage drop the controller will increase the gate current for charging the gate-source-capacitance of the voltage regulating MOSFET in order to increase the conductivity of the voltage regulating MOSFET thus re-adjusting the output voltage to its desired value.
The time which is needed to compensate for the disturbance in the output voltage induced by the step in a load current is determined by the loop bandwidth of the closed loop control system and especially dependent on the value of the gate-source-capacitance of the voltage regulating MOSFET.
With a given value of the gate-source-capacitance of the voltage regulating MOSFET the speed of the closed loop control system can only be increased by increasing the gate current which charges the gate of the MOSFET. This gate current is supplied by a charge pump, as explained before, and, in order to minimize power consumption, an increase of the maximum gate current which would entail a more costly charge pump is not desirable.
In one embodiment of the invention the inventive voltage regulator comprises a power filed effect transistor having a threshold voltage, a drain terminal receiving an input voltage, a source terminal providing an output voltage and a load current, a gate terminal responsive to a control signal, and a bulk terminal. The voltage regulator further comprises a control loop circuits responsive to the output voltage and providing the control signal. The control loop circuit is adapted for adjusting said control signal to such a value that the output voltage is regulated to a desired (constant) value. Additionally the threshold voltage of the power field effect transistor is modified dependent on the load current. Alternatively the threshold voltage can be modified dependent on the output voltage or on both, the output voltage and the load current.
In another embodiment of the invention the voltage regulator additionally comprises a switching circuit for modifying the threshold voltage. The switching circuit is responsive to the output voltage and/or to the load current and it is adapted for connecting the bulk terminal of the field effect transistor with either the source terminal or a constant potential dependent on the load currents and/or the output voltage.
Another aspect of the invention also comprises a method for controlling the power field effect transistor which was defined above. In one embodiment the method comprises the step of modifying the threshold voltage dependent on the load current and/or the output voltage. This can be done, for example, by a connecting the bulk terminal of the field effect transistor with either the source terminal or a constant potential dependent on the load current and/or the output voltage.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, instead emphasis being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts. In the drawings:
The feedback circuit 10 comprises a controller 13 whose input is connected to the source terminal S and responsive to the output voltage Vout. The output of the controller 13 provides a controller voltage Vc received by the gate of a controlling transistor 12 whose source terminal is connected to the ground terminal GND and whose drain terminal is connected to the gate G of the voltage regulating power MOSFET Mp and to a current source 11 providing a bias current Ibias to the gate G and to the controlling transistor 12. The current source 11 is connected to a third supply terminal receiving a supply voltage Vcp provided by a charge pump (not shown).
The function of the feedback circuit can be easily understood with the help of the timing diagrams shown in
The time which is needed to readjust the drop in the output voltage Vout to its desired constant value depends on the time the feedback circuit 10 needs to react to a drop in the output voltage, i.e. the loop delay time tL, the time which is needed to charge the gate-source capacitance of the power MOSFET Mp, i.e. the charging time tC. The loop delay time tL depends on the bandwidth of the feedback circuit 10 and is usually much smaller than the charging time tC. To decrease the overall delay time tD (TD=tL+tC) it is necessary to reduce the charging time tC, which could be done by increasing the bias current Ibias which would entail higher costs for the current source 11 and the charge pump.
Another possibility to improve the overall delay tD time without the need for increasing the bias current Ibias is shown in
The constant potential V2 is preferably lower than the output voltage Vout and can also be equal to ground potential GND. An “ordinary” MOSFET would have its bulk terminal B connected to its source terminal S. Compared to this switching state (a first switching state) the threshold voltage of the power MOSFET Mp increases, if the switch SW connects the bulk terminal B of the power MOSFET Mp with the constant potential V2 being lower than the source potential (Vout) of the power MOSFET Mp. This state of the switch SW is further referred to as the second switching state. The function of the circuit is explained in more detail by reference to
Additionally to the embodiment shown in
In the current embodiment the switching signal S22 assumes a first logic level, e.g. a high level, if the load current Iload is lower than a reference current defined by the quotient Vos/R and the output voltage is higher than the reference voltage Vref. Then the first p-MOS transistor M1 is switched to an off-state and the n-MOS transistor M2 is switched to an on-state, thus isolating the bulk terminal B of the power MOSFET Mp from the output terminal providing the output voltage Vout (and also from its source terminal S) and connecting the bulk terminal B of the power MOSFET Mp with the constant potential V2 which is—in the current case—equal to the ground potential.
If either the output voltage drops below the reference voltage Vref or the load current rises above the reference current defined by the quotient Vos/R the output logic level of one of the comparators 23, 31 will change and the output signal S22 of the AND-gate 22 will switch to a second logic level, e.g. a low level, thus switching on the p-MOS transistor M1 and switching off the n-MOS transistor M2 and the p-MOS transistor M3. The bulk terminal B of the power MOSFET Mp is than connected to the source terminal S of the power MOSFET Mp and isolated from the constant potential V2.
Connecting the bulk terminal either with a constant potential V2 or with the source terminal S will change the threshold voltage of the voltage regulating power MOSFET Mp. The effect of this change of the threshold voltage on the speed of the feedback circuit can easily be explained by the help of
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5666045 | Grodevant | Sep 1997 | A |
5929615 | D'Angelo et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6744288 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801033 | Sudo et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7253592 | Leyk et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020185681 | Nakano et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040239304 | Perez | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060007618 | Leyk et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070057655 | Nishida | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070210779 | Itoh | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080157741 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |