This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 based on Germany Application No. 102 46 162.3 filed on Oct. 22, 2002.
The invention relates to a voltage regulator which may be integrated in a semiconductor circuit.
Many battery-powered handhelds such as, for example, mobile phones or electronic notebooks contain complex integrated semiconductor circuits powered by one or more supply voltages. These supply voltages are often generated by voltage regulators, integrated in the semiconductor circuits, from a battery voltage. For this purpose in these devices so-called low dropout voltage regulators are often used which are capable of furnishing a stable regulated voltage even when the difference between the battery voltage and the desired supply voltage is very small. This is why the battery voltage must be only insignificantly higher than the desired output voltage and as a rule the dissipation loss of the voltage regulator is very low. In addition, the voltage regulator is capable of stabilizing the supply voltage even when the battery voltage has been greatly reduced due to discharge.
Voltage regulators may be configured with a simple single-stage feedback loop. Shown in
However, this circuit has some drawbacks. For one thing, the feedback circuit becomes unstable at a very low load current Iout in tending to oscillate. The output impedance of the power transistor forms together with the output capacitor Cout a low-pass which in circuit terminology is usually termed a pole position as derived from a mathematical description of the transient response widely used in circuitry by means of the Laplace transformation. In this arrangement the transient function of a low-pass is described by a function comprising a zero position in a polynomial denominator.
A second pole position of the voltage regulator as shown in
Known further in feedback control systems (e.g. in the German textbook thereon by O. Föllinger, published by Hüthig Buch Verlag, 7th edition, page 270) are cascaded feedback loops each of which can be optimized to thus feature improved performance as compared to single-stage feedback loops. Applying this to the present case of the feedback circuit for voltage regulators, this could result in a circuit, for instance, as shown in
The bandwidth of the outer loop is defined by a compensating capacitor CC connected to the output of the error amplifier. The compensating capacitor CC forms together with the output impedance of the error amplifier the pole position of the outer feedback loop. As described above, at very low load currents the other pole position of the output amplifier is shifted in the direction of lower frequencies. If the pole positions of the inner and outer loop have the same frequency the feedback circuit becomes unstable. Although this can be counteracted by suitably selecting the capacitor at the output of the error amplifier, this involves very high capacitance values taking up a lot of space on the chip; in other words, there possibly not being enough room to integrate the capacitor in the semiconductor circuit and it thus needs to be applied externally to the chip. This complicates such a feedback circuit and makes it expensive.
Another drawback of this circuit becomes evident when the load element has a very high current requirement, for instance due to the output being short-circuited to ground. In most voltage regulators this is counteracted by an additional circuit for limiting the output current. As soon as a critical maximum permissible current is attained the power transistor is turned off. In the turned off condition the output of the voltage regulator is grounded and the output of the error amplifier increases up to a maximum permissible potential corresponding to its positive operating voltage, for example. Once the short-circuit is eliminated, the voltage at the output of the voltage regulator spikes since the capacitor at the output of the error amplifier first needs to be discharged to allow the input voltage of the output amplifier to fall. This voltage spike may be damaging to the load being supplied.
It is thus the objective of the invention to provide a voltage regulator which eliminates the drawbacks of existing voltage regulators as described above.
This objective is achieved for the voltage regulator in accordance with the invention as cited above in that the voltage regulator now includes a transistor whose main current path circuited between the input voltage terminal of the voltage regulator and the output of the voltage regulator comprises an amplifier whose output is connected to the control terminal of the transistor and to the one input of which a voltage as a function of the output voltage of the voltage regulator is applied, and a transconductance amplifier whose output is connected to the other input of the amplifier, a first resistor and a capacitor wherein the one input of the transconductance amplifier is connected to a further voltage as a function of the output voltage of the voltage regulator whilst the other input of the transconductance amplifier is connected to a reference voltage dictating the output voltage of the voltage regulator and a further resistor is circuited between the one input and the other input of the amplifier.
This assembly in accordance with the invention now provides a voltage regulator having the advantage of a resistor being formed by a simple compensation circuit which increases the phase reserve at low load currents. This is especially important for battery-powered handhelds such as e.g. mobile phones or electronic organizers, since these devices are often on standby with a reduced current consumption and need to be activated only occasionally for use. The voltage regulator in accordance with the invention supplies the device on standby with a stable supply voltage without any additional circuiting needing to be implemented. In addition, due to the compensation circuit in the form of a resistor the response of the voltage regulator when overloaded by too high a current at the output of the voltage regulator is significantly improved by voltage spikes no longer appearing when the overload is removed in thus eliminating the need of complicated protective mechanisms at the output of the voltage regulator for remedying over voltages. In addition, in this compensation circuit a compensating capacitor is needed which features a smaller capacitance than that as shown in the circuit in
Referring now to
The voltage regulator in accordance with the invention will now be described for the case in which the input voltage Vin assumes a positive value relative to the fixed potential of the load element 11 without this being understood as any limitation to this case, however. The person skilled in the art is aware of how the circuit can be made to function in the inverse situation of the potentials, for example, by replacing transistors of a first channel type by transistors of a second channel type.
Transistor 10 may be configured as a power transistor. When the input voltage Vin is positive, for example, for this purpose a bipolar PNP transistor is suitable whose emitter is connected to the input voltage Vin of the voltage regulator and whose collector is connected to the output voltage Vout of the voltage regulator, or—as shown in FIG. 3—a PMOS field-effect transistor 10 whose source 12 is connected to the input voltage Vin of the voltage regulator and whose drain is connected to the output voltage Vout of the voltage regulator. If the voltage regulator in feedback operation is required to have a low drop in voltage between input voltage Vin and output voltage Vout of the voltage regulator the PMOS field-effect transistor 10 may be configured, for example, with a wide channel so that the resistance of the source/drain channel is very low; a voltage regulator in this mode usually being termed a low-dropout (LDO) regulator.
The gate 16 of the PMOS field-effect transistor 10 is connected to the output of an amplifier 20. The amplifier 20 may be, for example, an operational amplifier needing to comprise a low loop gain for correct functioning of the voltage regulator in accordance with the invention and thus can be configured very simple. Because of its function the amplifier 20 is termed output amplifier in the circuit in accordance with the invention. The inverting input 22 of the amplifier 20 is connected to the output voltage Vout terminal. The amplifier 20 forms with this negative feedback a first inner feedback loop. Its non-inverting input 24 is connected to the output of an error amplifier 30.
The error amplifier 30 forms a second, outer feedback loop in which the negative feedback is a function of the output voltage Vout of the voltage regulator. For this purpose, as evident from
The error amplifier 30 takes the form of a transconductance amplifier furnishing at its output as a function of the voltage difference at non-inverting input 34 and inverting input 32 a current which is proportional to the slope GM of the error amplifier 30. This current is converted into a voltage at the output of the transconductance amplifier by an output impedance which for example as shown in
The inverting input 22 and non-inverting input 24 of the output amplifier 20 are connected to a resistor RSZ which serves to compensate the gain of the outer loop at low load currents Iout, as will now be explained.
As long as the voltage at the output of the output amplifier 20 follows that at the output of the error amplifier 30, resistor RSZ has no effect on the gain, because the inverting input 22 and non-inverting input 24 have the same potential and there is thus no drop in voltage across the resistor RSZ. The resistor RSZ is only effective when the output of the output amplifier 20 is no longer able to follow the output signal of the error amplifier 30 because of a sudden change in the load current Iout. This relates mainly to changes in the load current Iout occurring in a frequency range remote from the bandwidth of the output amplifier 20.
Due to the output impedance of the transistor 10 being a function of the current Iout by the load element 11, the bandwidth of the output amplifier is reduced with a reduction in the load current Iout. For a more precise description of the function of the resistor RSZ three different cases can be distinguished by the bandwidth of the output amplifier 20 become larger, smaller or remaining roughly the same as that of the error amplifier 30 in a range of the Load current Iout for feedback.
In the first case, the change in the load current occurs in a range in which the load current Iout is so large that the bandwidth of the output amplifier 20 is wider than that of the error amplifier 30. The output amplifier 20 has the function of a voltage follower, the effect of the resistor RSZ on the load element not being noticeable, since the changes in the load current Iout are remote from the bandwidth of the error amplifier 30.
In the case of very small load currents, however, the bandwidth of the output amplifier 20 is reduced, as explained above. In this case in which, for example, the circuit as shown in
In the case in which the bandwidths of the two amplifiers are practically the same, the resulting phase shift is small since at this frequency the impedance of the compensating capacitor CC is practically the same as the impedance of the resistor RSZ. This remaining shift in phase can be influenced by selecting the product of the value of the resistor RSZ and the gain GM of the transconductance amplifier 30. It needs to be taken into account, however, that the output amplifier 20, like any operational amplifier, comprises a finite input offset voltage. The product of the value of the resistor RSZ and the gain GM of the transconductance amplifier 30 is also a measure of the effect of the finite input offset voltage of the output amplifier 20 so that a tradeoff needs to be made between the remaining phase shift and the tolerable input offset voltage.
Referring now to
For load currents Iout exceeding roughly 1 mA the phase reserve for both circuits is practically 90° since it is substantially only the pole position of the output amplifier that produces a shift in phase.
The difference in the response of the two circuits is clearly evident with diminishing load currents Iout. Whilst the voltage regulator as shown in
In the voltage regulator in accordance with the invention the gain of the error amplifier 30 is limited at low load currents with the aid of the resistor RSZ. This is why the compensating capacitor CC, as compared to a voltage regulator as shown in
The response of the voltage regulator to an overload is likewise influenced by the resistor RSZ. As a rule, a voltage regulator is provided with overload protection (not shown in
The embodiment of the voltage regulator as shown in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102 49 162 | Oct 2002 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5672959 | Der | Sep 1997 | A |
| 6600299 | Xi | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6703815 | Biagi | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040104711 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |