The technology of the disclosure relates generally to reducing voltage ripple in a modulated voltage in a power management circuit.
Fifth generation (5G) new radio (NR) (5G-NR) has been widely regarded as the next generation of wireless communication technology beyond the current third generation (3G) and fourth generation (4G) technologies. In this regard, a wireless communication device capable of supporting the 5G-NR wireless communication technology is expected to achieve higher data rates, improved coverage range, enhanced signaling efficiency, and reduced latency.
Downlink and uplink transmissions in a 5G-NR system are widely based on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) technology. In an OFDM based system, physical radio resources are divided into a number of subcarriers in a frequency domain and a number of OFDM symbols in a time domain. The subcarriers are orthogonally separated from each other by a subcarrier spacing (SCS). The OFDM symbols are separated from each other by a cyclic prefix (CP), which acts as a guard band to help overcome inter-symbol interference (ISI) between the OFDM symbols.
A radio frequency (RF) signal communicated in the OFDM based system is often modulated into multiple subcarriers in the frequency domain and multiple OFDM symbols in the time domain. The multiple subcarriers occupied by the RF signal collectively define a modulation bandwidth of the RF signal. The multiple OFDM symbols, on the other hand, define multiple time intervals during which the RF signal is communicated. In the 5G-NR system, the RF signal is typically modulated with a high modulation bandwidth in excess of 200 MHz (e.g., 1 GHz).
The duration of an OFDM symbol depends on the SCS and the modulation bandwidth. The table below (Table 1) provides some OFDM symbol durations, as defined by 3G partnership project (3GPP) standards for various SCSs and modulation bandwidths. Notably, the higher the modulation bandwidth is, the shorter the OFDM symbol duration will be. For example, when the SCS is 120 KHz and the modulation bandwidth is 400 MHz, the OFDM symbol duration is 8.93 μs.
Notably, the wireless communication device relies on a battery cell (e.g., Li-Ion battery) to power its operations and services. Despite recent advancement in battery technologies, the wireless communication device can run into a low battery situation from time to time. In this regard, it is desirable to prolong battery life concurrent to enabling fast voltage changes between the OFDM symbols.
Embodiments of the disclosure relate to voltage ripple reduction in a power management circuit. The power management circuit includes a power amplifier circuit configured to amplify a radio frequency (RF) signal based on a modulated voltage and an envelope tracking integrated circuit (ETIC) configured to provide the modulated voltage to the power amplifier circuit via a conductive path. Notably, an output impedance (e.g., an inductive impedance associated with the ETIC and the conductive path) presenting at an input of the power amplifier circuit can interact with a modulated load current in the power amplifier circuit to create a voltage ripple in the modulated voltage to potentially cause an undesirable error in the RF signal. In embodiments disclosed herein, the ETIC is configured to modify the modulated voltage based on feedback that indicates the voltage ripple in the modulated voltage as received at the power amplifier input. By modifying the modulated voltage based on knowledge of the voltage ripple, it is possible to reduce the output impedance at the input of the power amplifier circuit to thereby reduce the voltage ripple in the modulated voltage.
In one aspect, a power management circuit is provided. The power management circuit includes a power amplifier circuit. The power amplifier circuit is configured to amplify an RF signal based on a modulated voltage received at a power amplifier input. The modulated voltage received at the power amplifier input comprises a voltage ripple caused by an output impedance presenting at the power amplifier input. The power management circuit also includes an ETIC. The ETIC includes a voltage output coupled to the power amplifier input via a conductive path. The ETIC also includes a voltage modulation circuit. The voltage modulation circuit is configured to generate the modulated voltage at the voltage output based on a modulated target voltage. The voltage modulation circuit is also configured to receive power amplifier voltage feedback indicating the voltage ripple in the modulated voltage received at the power amplifier input. The voltage modulation circuit is also configured to modify the modulated voltage based on the power amplifier voltage feedback to cause a reduction in the output impedance to thereby reduce the voltage ripple in the modulated voltage received at the power amplifier input.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “on” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly on or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. Likewise, it will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “over” or extending “over” another element, it can be directly over or extend directly over the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly over” or extending “directly over” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.
Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer, or region to another element, layer, or region as illustrated in the Figures. It will be understood that these terms and those discussed above are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the Figures.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” and/or “including” when used herein specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. It will be further understood that terms used herein should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of this specification and the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
Embodiments of the disclosure relate to voltage ripple reduction in a power management circuit. The power management circuit includes a power amplifier circuit configured to amplify a radio frequency (RF) signal based on a modulated voltage and an envelope tracking integrated circuit (ETIC) configured to provide the modulated voltage to the power amplifier circuit via a conductive path. Notably, an output impedance (e.g., an inductive impedance associated with the ETIC and the conductive path) presenting at an input of the power amplifier circuit can interact with a modulated load current in the power amplifier circuit to create a voltage ripple in the modulated voltage to potentially cause an undesirable error in the RF signal. In embodiments disclosed herein, the ETIC is configured to modify the modulated voltage based on feedback that indicates the voltage ripple in the modulated voltage as received at the power amplifier input. By modifying the modulated voltage based on knowledge of the voltage ripple, it is possible to reduce the output impedance at the input of the power amplifier circuit to thereby reduce the voltage ripple in the modulated voltage.
Before discussing the specific voltage ripple reduction embodiment of the present disclosure, starting at
Notably, there may be an internal routing distance from the power amplifier input 22 to an actual voltage input 26 (e.g., a collector node) of the power amplifier circuit. Given that the internal routing distance is far shorter than the conductive path 18, the internal routing distance is thus neglected hereinafter. Accordingly, the power amplifier input 22 as illustrated herein can be equated with the actual voltage input 26 of the power amplifier circuit 16.
The power management circuit 12 may be coupled to a transceiver circuit 28. Herein, the transceiver circuit 28 is configured to generate the RF signal 24 and the modulated target voltage VTGT.
The voltage ripple VCC-RP can be quantitively analyzed based on an equivalent electrical model of the power management circuit 12. In this regard,
The ETIC 14 inherently has an inductive impedance ZETIC that can be modeled by an ETIC inductance LETIC. The conductive path 18 can also be associated with an inductive trace impedance ZTRACE that can be modeled by a trace inductance LTRACE. As a result, looking from the power amplifier input 22 toward the ETIC 14, the power amplifier circuit 16 will see an output impedance ZOUT that includes both the inductive impedance ZETIC and the inductive trace impedance ZTRACE.
The power amplifier circuit 16 can be modeled as a current source. In this regard, the power amplifier circuit 16 will modulate a load current ILOAD based on the modulated voltage VCC. The load current ILOAD can interact with the output impedance ZOUT to create the voltage ripple VCC-RP in the modulated voltage VCC received at the power amplifier input 22. In this regard, the voltage ripple VCC-RP is a function of the modulated load current ILOAD and the output impedance ZOUT, as expressed in equation (Eq. 1) below.
VCC-RP=ILOAD*ZOUT (Eq. 1)
Notably from the equation (Eq. 1), it may be possible to reduce the voltage ripple VCC-RP by lowering the output impedance ZOUT seen at the power amplifier input 22. In this regard, the conventional approach for reducing the voltage ripple VCC-RP in the power management circuit 12 of
ZOUT=ZCPA∥(ZETIC+ZTRACE) (Eq. 2)
In the equation (Eq. 2), ZCPA represents a capacitive impedance of the decoupling capacitor CPA. The capacitive impedance ZCPA and the inductive impedance ZETIC and ZTRACE can each be determined according to equations (Eq. 3.1-3.3) below.
|ZCPA|=½πf*CPA (Eq. 3.1)
|ZETIC|=2πf*LETIC (Eq. 3.2)
|ZTRACE|=2πf*LTRACE (Eq. 3.3)
In the equations (Eq. 3.1-3.3), f represents the modulation frequency of the load current ILOAD. In this regard, the capacitive impedance ZCPA, the inductive impedance ZETIC, and the inductive trace impedance ZTRACE are each a function of the modulation frequency f.
When the modulation frequency f is lower than 10 MHz, the output impedance ZOUT is dominated by a real part of the inductive impedance ZETIC and a real part of the inductive trace impedance ZTRACE. Between 10 MHz and 100 MHz, the output impedance ZOUT is dominated by the inductive impedance ZETIC and the inductive trace impedance ZTRACE. Above 1000 MHz, the output impedance ZOUT will be dominated by the capacitive impedance ZCPA.
Herein, a modulation bandwidth BWMOD of the RF signal 24 may fall between 100 MHz and 1000 MHz (e.g., 100-500 MHz). In this frequency range, the output impedance ZOUT will be determined by the output impedance ZOUT as expressed in equation (Eq. 2).
Notably from equations (Eq. 2 and 3.1), the capacitive impedance ZCPA, and therefore the output impedance ZOUT, will decrease as the capacitance CPA increases. In this regard, the conventional approach for reducing the ripple voltage VCC-RP relies largely on adding the decoupling capacitor CPA with a larger capacitance (e.g., 1 to 2 μF). However, doing so can cause some obvious issues.
Understandably, a rate of change of the modulated voltage VCC (ΔVCC or dV/dt) can be inversely affected by the capacitance of the decoupling capacitor CPA, as shown in equation (Eq. 4) below.
ΔVCC=ICC/CPA (Eq. 4)
In the equation (Eq. 4), ICC represents a low-frequency current (a.k.a. in-rush current) provided by the ETIC 14 when the decoupling capacitor CPA is charged or discharged. In this regard, the larger capacitance the decoupling capacitor CPA has, the larger amount of the low-frequency current ICC would be needed to change the modulated voltage VCC at a required rate of change (ΔVCC). As a result, the existing transmission circuit 10 may cause a negative impact on battery life.
If the low-frequency current ICC is kept at a low level to prolong battery life, the existing transmission circuit 10 may have difficulty meeting the required rate of change (ΔVCC), particularly when the RF signal 24 is modulated based on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) for transmission in a millimeter wave (mmWave) spectrum. Consequently, the existing transmission circuit 10 may not be able to change the modulated voltage VCC in between OFDM symbols.
On the other hand, if the capacitance of the decoupling capacitor CPA is reduced to help improve the rate of change (ΔVCC) of the modulated voltage VCC and reduce the in-rush current ICC, doing so may lead to insufficient reduction of the output impedance ZOUT and, thus, the voltage ripple VCC-RP. Hence, it is desirable to sufficiently reduce the ripple voltage VCC-RP within the modulation bandwidth BWMOD concurrent to improving the rate of change (ΔVCC) of the modulated voltage VCC and reducing the in-rush current ICC.
The power management circuit 32 includes an ETIC 42. The ETIC 42 includes a voltage modulation circuit 44. The voltage modulation circuit 44 is configured to generate the modulated voltage VCC at a voltage output 46 based on a modulated target voltage VTGT. Herein, the voltage output 46 is coupled to the power amplifier input 34 via the conductive path 38.
Like the power management circuit 12 in
In embodiments disclosed herein, the decoupling capacitor CPA has a smaller capacitance (e.g., 100 pF) compared to the decoupling capacitor CPA in the power amplifier circuit 16 in
Further, the power management circuit 32 is configured to reduce the voltage ripple VCC-RP in the modulated voltage VCC by reducing the output impedance POUT presenting at the power amplifier input 34 and/or creating a notch filter at the power amplifier input 34. As a result, the power management circuit 32 can achieve a defined performance threshold, such as RMS EVM and/or peak EVM within the modulation bandwidth of the RF signal 40.
In an embodiment, the voltage modulation circuit 44 includes a voltage amplifier 48 (denoted as “VA”), which can be an operational amplifier (OpAmp), as an example. The voltage amplifier 48 is configured to generate an initial modulated voltage VAMP at a voltage amplifier output 50 based on the modulated target voltage VTGT and a supply voltage VSUP. The voltage modulation circuit 44 also includes an offset capacitor COFF that is coupled in between the voltage amplifier output 50 and the voltage output 46. The offset capacitor COFF is configured to raise the initial modulated voltage VAMP by an offset voltage VOFF to thereby generate the modulated voltage VCC at the voltage output 46 (VCC=VAMP+VOFF).
The voltage amplifier 48 is also configured to receive a modulated voltage feedback VCC-FB that indicates the modulated voltage VCC at the voltage output 46, thus making the voltage modulation circuit 44 a closed-loop circuit. Accordingly, the voltage amplifier 48 can adjust the initial modulated voltage VAMP and, thus the modulated voltage VCC, based on the modulated feedback VCC-FB to better track the modulated target voltage VTGT.
The voltage amplifier 48 includes an input/bias stage 52 and an output stage 54. The output stage 54 is coupled in series to the voltage amplifier output 50. According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the output stage 54 is configured to receive a power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-PA-FB that indicates the modulated voltage VCC as received at the power amplifier input 34. The output stage 54 may receive the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-PA-FB via a feedback path 56. Like the conductive path 38, the feedback path 56 is associated with an inductive feedback trace impedance ZTRACE-FB that can be modeled by a feedback inductance LTRACE-FB.
Understandably, since the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-PA-FB is provided from the power amplifier input 34, the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-PA-FB will include the voltage ripple VCC-RP in the modulated voltage VCC as received at the power amplifier input 34. Accordingly, the voltage amplifier 48 may modify the initial modulated voltage VAMP based on the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-PA-FB to cause the output impedance ZOUT to be reduced at the power amplifier input 34, thus helping to reduce the voltage ripple VCC-RP in the modulated voltage VCC that is received at the power amplifier input 34.
The ETIC 42 may include a control circuit 58, which can be a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) or an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), as an example. In an embodiment, the control circuit 58 may control the voltage amplifier 48, for example, via a control signal 60, to modify the initial modulated voltage VAMP based on the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-PA-FB to thereby reduce the output impedance ZOUT at the power amplifier input 34.
In an embodiment, the input/bias stage 52 is configured to receive the modulated voltage VTGT and the modulated voltage feedback VCC-FB. Accordingly, the input/bias stage 52 generates a pair of bias signals 62P (a.k.a. first bias signal), 62N (a.k.a. second bias signal) to control the output stage 54.
In an embodiment, the output stage 54 is configured to generate the initial modulated voltage VAMP at the voltage amplifier output 50 based on a selected one of the bias signals 62P, 62N. The output stage 54 is also configured to receive the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-FB. Accordingly, the output stage 54 can modify the initial modulated voltage VAMP based on the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-FB to reduce the output impedance ZOUT and thereby the voltage ripple VCC-RP at the power amplifier input 34.
In an embodiment, the output stage 54 includes a first transistor 64P and a second transistor 64N. In a non-limiting example, the first transistor 64P is a p-type field-effect transistor (pFET) and the second transistor 64N is an n-type FET (nFET). In this example, the first transistor 64P includes a first source electrode C1, a first drain electrode D1, and a first gate electrode G1, and the second transistor 64N includes a second source electrode C2, a second drain electrode D2, and a second gate electrode G2. Specifically, the first drain electrode D1 is configured to receive the supply voltage VSUP, the second drain electrode D2 is coupled to a ground (GND), and the first source electrode C1 and the second source electrode C2 are both coupled to the voltage amplifier output 50.
The first gate electrode G1 is coupled to the input/bias stage 52 to receive the bias signal 62P and the second gate electrode G2 is coupled to the input/bias stage 52 to receive the bias signal 62N. Herein, the input/bias stage 52 is configured to generate the bias signal 62P in response to an increase of the modulated voltage VCC or generate the bias signal 62N in response to a decrease of the modulated voltage VCC. Specifically, the first transistor 64P will be turned on to output the initial modulated voltage VAMP and source a high-frequency current IAC (e.g., an alternating current) from the supply voltage VSUP in response to receiving the bias signal 62P, and the second transistor 64N will be turned on to output the initial modulated voltage VAMP from the supply voltage VSUP and sink the high-frequency current IAC to the GND in response to receiving the bias signal 62N.
In this embodiment, the output stage 54 also includes a first Miller capacitor CMiller1 and a second Miller capacitor CMiller2. Specifically, the first Miller capacitor CMiller1 is coupled between the voltage amplifier output 50 and the first gate electrode G1, and the second Miller capacitor CMiller2 is coupled between the voltage amplifier output 50 and the second gate electrode G2. In this regard, the output stage 54 can be regarded as a typical class AB rail-rail OpAmp output stage. The first Miller capacitor CMiller1 and the second Miller capacitor CMiller2 not only can stabilize controls of the first transistor 64P and the second transistor 64N (e.g., mitigating so-called Miller effect), but may also reduce the closed-loop output impedance of the voltage amplifier 48.
Notably, since the first Miller capacitor CMiller1 and the second Miller capacitor CMiller2 are each coupled to the voltage amplifier output 50, the first Miller capacitor CMiller1 and the second Miller capacitor CMiller2 can only reduce the inductive impedance ZETIC, which is part of the output impedance ZOUT seen at the power amplifier input 34. As such, to further reduce the output impedance ZOUT, it is also necessary to reduce the inductive trace impedance ZTRACE.
In this regard, the output stage 54 further includes a first resistor-capacitor (RC) circuit 66P and a second RC circuit 66N. The first RC circuit 66P and the second RC circuit 66N are both coupled to the power amplifier input 34 via the feedback path 56 to thereby receive the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-FB. Specifically, the first RC circuit 66P is coupled between the power amplifier input 34 and the first gate electrode G1, and the second RC circuit 66N is coupled between the power amplifier input 34 and the second gate electrode G2. As such, the first RC circuit 66P can cause the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-FB to be combined with the bias signal 62P to thereby modify the bias signal 62P. Similarly, the second RC circuit 66N can cause the power amplifier voltage feedback VCC-FB to be combined with the bias signal 62N to thereby modify the bias signal 62N.
In an embodiment, the first RC circuit 66P includes a first adjustable resistor RFB1 and a first adjustable capacitor CFB1, and the second RC circuit 66N includes a second adjustable resistor RFB2 and a second adjustable capacitor CFB2. Recall that the feedback path 56 is associated with the inductive feedback trace impedance ZTRACE-FB that can be modeled by the feedback inductance LTRACE-FB. As such, the first adjustable resistor RFB1, the first adjustable capacitor CFB1, and the feedback inductance LTRACE-FB can be equated with a first resistor-inductor-capacitor (RLC) circuit, which has a first resonance frequency f1 as expressed in equation (Eq. 5) below.
f1=½π√{square root over (LTRACE-FB*CFB1)} (Eq. 5)
Likewise, the second adjustable resistor RFB2, the second adjustable capacitor CFB2, and the feedback inductance LTRACE-FB can be equated with a second RLC circuit, which has a second resonance frequency f2 as expressed in equation (Eq. 6) below.
f2=½π√{square root over (LTRACE-FB*CFB2)} (Eq. 6)
From equations (Eq. 5 and 6), the first adjustable capacitor CFB1 and the second adjustable capacitor CFB2 can each be adjusted to resonate with the feedback inductance LTRACE-FB to create a low-impedance feedback path at a respective one of the first resonance frequency f1 and the second resonance frequency f2. The first adjustable resistor RFB1 will de-Q the first resonance frequency f1 across the modulation bandwidth BWMOD to prevent the first adjustable capacitor CFB1 and the feedback inductance LTRACE-FB from entering oscillation at the first resonance frequency f1. Likewise, the second adjustable resistor RFB2 will de-Q the second resonance frequency f2 across the modulation bandwidth BWMOD to prevent the second adjustable capacitor CFB2 and the feedback inductance LTRACE-FB from entering oscillation at the second resonance frequency f2.
When the voltage ripple VCC-RP seen at the power amplifier input 34 is fed back to the first gate electrode G1 or the second gate electrode G2, the first transistor 64P and the second transistor 64N may act like a common source amplifier, which amplifies and inverts the initial modulated voltage VAMP at the voltage amplifier output 50 and, therefore, the voltage output 46 of the ETIC 42. The inverted initial modulated voltage VAMP will cause more of the load current ILOAD to flow to the GND through the conductive path 38 (a.k.a. the trace inductor LTRACE) than flowing through the power amplifier circuit 36, thus lowering the inductive trace impedance ZTRACE and, accordingly the output impedance ZOUT at the power amplifier input 34.
Thus, by adjusting the first adjustable capacitor CFB1, the first adjustable resistor RFB1, the second adjustable capacitor CFB2, and/or the second adjustable resistor RFB2, it is possible to reduce the output impedance ZOUT to across the modulation bandwidth BWMOD. In an embodiment, the first adjustable capacitor CFB1, the first adjustable resistor RFB1, the second adjustable capacitor CFB2, and/or the second adjustable resistor RFB2 may be adjusted by the control circuit 58 via the control signal 60.
By employing the first Miller capacitor CMiller1 and the second Miller capacitor CMiller2 to help reduce the inductive impedance ZETIC, and further employing the first RC circuit 66P and the second RC circuit 66N to help reduce the inductive trace impedance ZTRACE, it is possible to reduce the output impedance ZOUT to thereby reduce the voltage ripple VCC-RP in the modulated voltage VCC. A simulation shows that, at 200 MHz load current modulation frequency, the power management circuit 32 can reduce an RMS value of the voltage ripple VCC-RP from 231 mV, as in the power management circuit 12 in
With reference to
The power inductor LP is configured to induce a low-frequency current ICC (a.k.a. in-rush current) based on the low-frequency voltage VDC. As previously described in
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 63/303,532, filed on Jan. 27, 2022, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4797898 | Martinez | Jan 1989 | A |
5793821 | Norrell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6630862 | Perthold et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6760451 | Craven et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6947711 | Leyonhjelm | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7076225 | Li et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7170342 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7430248 | McCallister | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7663436 | Takano et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683713 | Hongo | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7755429 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7859338 | Bajdechi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7889820 | Murthy et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8493141 | Khlat | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8605819 | Lozhkin | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8649745 | Bai et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8749309 | Ho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8831544 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8884692 | Lee | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9036734 | Mauer et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9065504 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9112413 | Barth et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9356760 | Larsson et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9438196 | Smith et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9560595 | Dakshinamurthy et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9692366 | Pilgram | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9705477 | Velazquez | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9973370 | Langer et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10177719 | Gazneli et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10305435 | Murugesu et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10326408 | Khlat et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10361744 | Khlat | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10476437 | Nag et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10778345 | El-Hassan et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
11005368 | Bansal et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11088660 | Lin et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11387789 | Khlat et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11424719 | Khlat | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11569783 | Nomiyama et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11637531 | Perreault et al. | Apr 2023 | B1 |
20010054974 | Wright | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020190811 | Sperber | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030042979 | Gurvich et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040239446 | Gurvich et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050100105 | Jensen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050254659 | Heinsen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060068710 | Jensen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060209981 | Kluesing et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217083 | Braithwaite | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070032208 | Choi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080009258 | Safarian et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080074209 | Ceylan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080246550 | Biedka et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090004981 | Eliezer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061787 | Koller et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074106 | See et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090125264 | Betts et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141830 | Ye | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090232260 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090302945 | Catoiu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100135439 | Lackey | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100298030 | Howard | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110095826 | Hadjichristos et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110182347 | Cheung | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110227767 | O'Brien | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120068748 | Stojanovic et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120139635 | Ho et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120189081 | Omoto et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120244824 | Entezari et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256688 | Onishi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120293253 | Khlat | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130141062 | Khlat | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130214858 | Tournatory | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222057 | Henshaw | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130243129 | Okuni et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140028368 | Khlat | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140029683 | Morris et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140062590 | Khlat et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140062599 | Xu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140065989 | McLaurin | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072307 | Zamani et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140084996 | Schwent et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140105264 | McLaurin et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140184337 | Nobbe et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213196 | Langer et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140232470 | Wilson | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140266432 | Scott et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140315504 | Sakai et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140361837 | Strange et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150028946 | Al-Qaq et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150126142 | Meredith | May 2015 | A1 |
20150333781 | Alon et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160173030 | Langer et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160174293 | Mow et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182099 | Boddupally et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182100 | Menkhoff et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160301432 | Shizawa et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160322992 | Okawa et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170005676 | Yan et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170104502 | Pratt | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170149457 | Mayer et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170170838 | Pagnanelli | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170338842 | Pratt | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170353197 | Ruffieux et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180034418 | Blednov | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180175813 | Scott et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180226923 | Nagamori | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180248570 | Camuffo | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190041890 | Chen et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190058530 | Rainish et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068234 | Khlat et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190238152 | Pagnanelli | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190245496 | Khlat et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190296929 | Milicevic et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190319583 | El-Hassan et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190356285 | Khlat et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200106392 | Khlat et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200119699 | Nishihara et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200136563 | Khlat | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200136568 | Hosoda et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200162030 | Drogi et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200204422 | Khlat | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200259685 | Khlat | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200295713 | Khlat | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200336111 | Khlat | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210067097 | Wang et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210099136 | Drogi et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210143859 | Hageraats et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210194517 | Mirea et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210281228 | Khlat | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210399690 | Panseri et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220021348 | Philpott | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220216834 | Myoung et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220360229 | Khlat | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220407462 | Khlat | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220407463 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220407464 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220407465 | Khlat | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220407478 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230065760 | Hellberg | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230079153 | Khlat | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230080621 | Khlat | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230080652 | Khlat et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230081095 | Khlat | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230082145 | Lin et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230155614 | Jelonnek et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230238927 | Kay et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230387859 | Drogi et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105812073 | Jul 2016 | CN |
107483021 | Dec 2017 | CN |
110798155 | Feb 2020 | CN |
210693998 | Jun 2020 | CN |
112995079 | Jun 2021 | CN |
2705604 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2582041 | Apr 2018 | EP |
2232713 | Oct 2018 | EP |
3416340 | Dec 2018 | EP |
2011211533 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2015099972 | May 2015 | JP |
2007092794 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2010011551 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010135711 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2014026178 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2021042088 | Mar 2021 | WO |
2023147211 | Aug 2023 | WO |
2023150539 | Aug 2023 | WO |
2023150545 | Aug 2023 | WO |
2023150587 | Aug 2023 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Williams, P., “Crossover Filter Shape Comparisons,” White Paper, Linea Research, Jul. 2013, 13 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 17/942,472, mailed Nov. 17, 2023, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,350, mailed Jan. 17, 2024, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2022/043600, mailed Jan. 11, 2023, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/942,472, mailed Feb. 16, 2023, 13 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22195382.1, mailed Feb. 1, 2023, 26 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22195683.2, mailed Feb. 10, 2023, 12 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/942,472, mailed Sep. 15, 2023, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/942,472, mailed Oct. 18, 2023, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/019267, mailed Aug. 3, 2023, 14 pages. |
Paek, J.-S. et al., “Design of Boosted Supply Modulator With Reverse Current Protection for Wide Battery Range in Envelope Tracking Operation,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 67, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 183-194. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,685, mailed Dec. 22, 2023, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/689,232, mailed Dec. 11, 2023, 27 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 17/737,300, mailed Dec. 19, 2023, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,700, mailed Oct. 23, 2023, 9 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,700, mailed Nov. 8, 2023, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 23174010.1, mailed Oct. 10, 2023, 10 pages. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 17/737,300, mailed Dec. 27, 2023, 8 pages. |
Advisory Action U.S. Appl. No. 17/689,232, mailed May 23, 2024, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/689,232, mailed Jul. 17, 2024, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,350, mailed May 21, 2024, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,826, mailed May 15, 2024, 28 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/061734, mailed May 30, 2023, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/061741, mailed Jun. 1, 2023, 14 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial International Search for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/061804, mailed May 26, 2023, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/061804, mailed Jul. 17, 2023, 20 pages. |
Cho, M., “Analog Predistortion for Improvement of RF Power Amplifier Efficiency and Linearity,” A Dissertation presented to the Academic Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Aug. 2016, available from the Internet: [URL: https://repository.gatech.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/b8fe5cbb-e5db-4efe-b9a2-eaad5f671f14/content], 113 pages. |
Kwak, T.-W. et al., “A 2W CMOS Hybrid Switching Amplitude Modulator for EDGE Polar Transmitters,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, No. 12, Dec. 2007, IEEE, pp. 2666-2676. |
Paek, J.-S. et al., “A -137 dBm/Hz Noise, 82% Efficiency AC-Coupled Hybrid Supply Modulator With Integrated Buck-Boost Converter,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, No. 11, Nov. 2016, IEEE pp. 2757-2768. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/737,300, mailed Aug. 28, 2023, 14 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 23153108.8, mailed Jun. 20, 2023, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,700, mailed Apr. 13, 2023, 11 pages. |
Bai, W.-D. et al., “Principle of Vector Synthesis Predistortion Linearizers Controlling AM/AM and AM/PM Independently,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Wireless Broadband (ICUWB), Oct. 16-19, 2016, Nanjing, China, IEEE, 3 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22195695.6, mailed Feb. 14, 2023, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22196188.1, mailed Feb. 2, 2023, 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,685, filed Mar. 22, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/689,232, filed Mar. 8, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/714,244, filed Apr. 6, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/737,300, filed May 5, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,700, filed Mar. 22, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,826, filed Mar. 22, 2022. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/942,472, mailed Jul. 19, 2023, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/060303, mailed Apr. 11, 2023, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,685, mailed Apr. 5, 2024, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/689,232, mailed Mar. 26, 2024, 28 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,700, mailed Feb. 28, 2024, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/942,472, filed Sep. 12, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,350, filed Sep. 7, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/890,538, filed Aug. 18, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,372, filed Sep. 7, 2022. |
Hammi et al., “Temperature Compensated Digital Predistorter for 3G Power Amplifiers,” Electronics, Circuit and Systems, 2005, Dec. 11, 2005, pp. 1-4. |
Hao et al., “Hybrid Analog/Digital Linearization Based on Dual-Domain Decomposition of Nonlinearity,” 2019 IEEE Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Dec. 10, 2019, pp. 156-158. |
Lee et al., “Fully Automated Adaptive Analog Predistortion Power Amplifier in WCDMA Applications,” 2005 European Microwave Conference CNIT La Defense, Paris, France, vol. 2, Oct. 4, 2005, pp. 967-970. |
Li et al., “Analog Predistorter Averaged Digital Predistortion for Power Amplifiers in Hybrid Beam-Forming Multi-Input Multi-Output Transmitter,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, Aug. 1, 2020, pp. 146145-146153. |
Tome et al., “Hybrid Analog/Digital Linearizatio nof GaN HEMT-Based Power Amplifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 67, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2019, pp. 288-294. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/689,232, mailed Oct. 21, 2024, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/714,244, mailed Sep. 16, 2024, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,350, mailed Sep. 6, 2024, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/890,538, mailed Oct. 21, 2024, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,826, mailed Sep. 11, 2024, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/060803, mailed May 19, 2023, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/060804, mailed May 4, 2023, 19 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/025512, mailed Sep. 28, 2023, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230238927 A1 | Jul 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63303532 | Jan 2022 | US |