1. Technical Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to audio amplifiers, and more specifically to amplifier biasing and volume control.
2. Background Art
Amplifiers are typically biased at a minimum bias level, in order to ensure good fidelity, low distortion, and so forth. In general, the most difficult case in which to achieve good fidelity is at the amplifier's maximum output level. Therefore, amplifier systems have traditionally had their bias set at a level such that the fidelity and performance are adequate at large signal operation.
At lower output level settings, this high bias level is typically far more than is necessary. This, unfortunately, results in an unnecessary and wasteful increase in power consumption when operating at small signal levels. This is especially unfortunate, given that most amplifiers are only rarely operated near their maximum output setting.
In general, it is desirable to minimize the power consumption of an amplifier circuit, particularly in battery-powered systems. It is also desirable to minimize the heat generated by the amplifier, to reduce costs associated with heatsinks, fans, and power supply components.
For a well-designed system which includes an output amplifier, the maximum output swing corresponds to the highest volume/level setting. Thus, the volume control setting and the output swing are related. In most systems, the volume control is implemented just before or as part of the power amplifier, or final stage in an amplifier chain, in order to maximize the dynamic range available to the preceding stages. In most systems, the maximum input level to the input of the volume control is known, and the peaks of the signal are generally made close to this limit, to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of the preceding stages. Hence, it is possible to calculate the maximum possible output for each possible volume control setting.
What is needed is an improved audio amplifier system in which the gain established by the bias generator is dynamically adjustable, rather than being set at some predetermined point. Having a dynamically adjustable bias will enable the amplifier system to minimize power consumption and improve fidelity across a wide range of input signal levels and volume control settings.
The invention will be understood more fully from the detailed description given below and from the accompanying drawings of embodiments of the invention which, however, should not be taken to limit the invention to the specific embodiments described, but are for explanation and understanding only.
The bias generator (or, alternatively, the volume control mechanism) monitors and derives a control value from the volume control setting. The bias generator modifies the quiescent bias currents provided to the amplifier, to satisfy only the maximum signal level possible at the current volume control setting. In this manner, the bias current and hence the power consumption of the system can be reduced as the volume setting is reduced. Audio systems are rarely used at their maximum volume setting, and using this technique will reduce power consumption during most operating conditions.
The amplifier system is coupled to be powered by a power source which, in many embodiments, may be a battery. The output of the amplifier system is coupled to drive a transducer such as a headphone or loudspeaker.
One suitable way to implement the output stage of the amplifier is to configure the output stage as multiple parallel devices which can be independently or sequentially powered down as the volume setting is reduced. In this manner, the output bias current, which flows between output devices 76 and 90, and between output devices 80 and 94, and between output devices 84 and 98, etc., can be reduced as the output swing requirements are reduced. Since the output bias current is generally a dominant component of the overall power consumption, large power savings can be made.
The circuit includes a plurality of parallel output stages 76, 90, 80, 94, 84, 98, 88, and 102, coupled in parallel to drive the output node Vout. The number, size, and/or power handling capacities of the various output stages can be selected according to the needs of the application at hand, and particularly in view of an anticipated volume setting usage model. In the example shown, the first output stage comprising devices 76 and 90 has a multiplier (M) value of N and is always active and directly coupled to the output. N can be any value suitable to create a minimum bias current that performs correctly for the minimum signal level with all other amplifier devices switched off. In some applications, N will be greater than 1. The values N, 1, 2, 4, etc. are for illustration only; in practice, the values do not need to be integer multiples.
A second output stage comprising devices 80 and 94 has a multiplier value of 1 and is coupled to be enabled and disabled by switches 78 and 92. A third output stage comprising devices 84 and 98 has a multiplier value of 2 and is coupled to be enabled and disabled by switches 82 and 96. A fourth output stage comprising devices 88 and 102 has a multiplier value of 4 and is coupled to be enabled and disabled by switches 86 and 100.
The switches are controlled by a binary weighted control word which may, in some embodiments, also be used to set a digitally controlled volume control (not shown). The binary weighted control word may be derived from the same digital signal that is used as an input to the digital volume control (not shown).
Amplifier output stages having a larger multiplier number (M) are able to drive larger output voltage swings into the loudspeaker load, but the output bias currents also increase by a factor of the multiplier M. By allowing the effective aggregate size of the amplifier output stage, and hence the overall output stage biasing current, to be adjusted by the volume control, the amplifier can be better optimized to match the output signal swing conditions while saving power.
When one component is said to be “adjacent” another component, it should not be interpreted to mean that there is absolutely nothing between the two components, only that they are in the order indicated.
The various features illustrated in the figures may be combined in many ways, and should not be interpreted as though limited to the specific embodiments in which they were explained and shown.
Those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that many other variations from the foregoing description and drawings may be made within the scope of the present invention. Indeed, the invention is not limited to the details described above. Rather, it is the following claims including any amendments thereto that define the scope of the invention.
The present application claims benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. provisional Application No. 60/784,638, filed on Mar. 21, 2006, entitled “Adaptive Biasing Based on Volume Control Setting,” the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4030045 | Clark | Jun 1977 | A |
4324950 | Strickland | Apr 1982 | A |
5038325 | Douglas et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5072171 | Eng | Dec 1991 | A |
5111375 | Marshall | May 1992 | A |
5115203 | Krett et al. | May 1992 | A |
5194821 | Brambilla | Mar 1993 | A |
5216379 | Hamley | Jun 1993 | A |
5347171 | Cordoba et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5387876 | Sondermeyer | Feb 1995 | A |
5442317 | Stengel | Aug 1995 | A |
5491839 | Schotz | Feb 1996 | A |
5694072 | Hsiao | Dec 1997 | A |
6028486 | Andre | Feb 2000 | A |
6107886 | Kusakabe | Aug 2000 | A |
6184726 | Haeberli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215356 | Servaes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256482 | Raab | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278332 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304138 | Johnson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323729 | Sevenhans et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6369661 | Scott et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373340 | Shashoua | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6417736 | Lewyn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6486733 | Myers et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6504426 | Picha et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6538514 | Harvey | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6552607 | Danielson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6583674 | Melava et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6614310 | Quarfoot et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636103 | Wurcer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6677789 | Svard | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6763470 | Bell et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6815988 | Sanduleanu | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6838942 | Somerville et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6853244 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6917245 | Dupuis et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6975175 | Sanduleanu | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980045 | Liu | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982600 | Harvey | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987417 | Winter et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993302 | Bausov et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998914 | Robinson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7026868 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034614 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042284 | Moons et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043213 | Robinson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7106135 | Makino et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7183844 | Klomsdorf et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202734 | Raab | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7358818 | Uesaka et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7408414 | North | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7498880 | Delano | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522433 | Delano et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7619480 | North | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7649415 | Delano | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20020084853 | Finlay et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020140513 | Maneatis | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030138112 | Doy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040189395 | Nagle et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050012554 | Somerville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070052482 | Kasha et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070236295 | Delano | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070285176 | North | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019546 | Delano et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080068079 | Delano | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080258811 | North et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080315955 | Delano | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6215356 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1120901 | Aug 2001 | EP |
63272208 | Nov 1988 | JP |
7240639 | Sep 1995 | JP |
8307223 | Nov 1996 | JP |
10173444 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11284450 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000183673 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002345078 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002345064 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2004282159 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004355713 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004357704 | Dec 2004 | JP |
WO 9723005 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 0000983 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO-2007109738 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007109738 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130750 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130750 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007136919 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007136919 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007136920 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007136920 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070223738 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60784638 | Mar 2006 | US |