The subject matter described herein relates to a vortex hybrid motor.
Hybrid rockets may be capable of providing safer, lower-cost avenues compared to conventional solid propellant and liquid bi-propellant rocket propulsion systems. For example, hybrid rocket engines can be easily throttled for thrust tailoring, to perform in-flight motor shutdown and restart, and to incorporate non-destructive mission abort modes. Also, since fuel in a hybrid rocket engine may be stored in the form of a solid grain, such engines may require half the feed system hardware of liquid bi-propellant engines. Additionally, the commonly used butadiene-based solid grain fuels may be benign and neither toxic nor hazardous for storage and transportation.
However, despite these benefits, classical hybrid rocket engines can suffer from relatively slow solid fuel regression rates, low volumetric loading, and relatively poor combustion efficiency. For example, polymeric hybrid fuels such as hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPD) may regress about an order of magnitude slower than solid rocket motor propellants. In an effort to overcome these lower regression rates, complex cross-sectional geometries of the hybrid solid fuel grain with large wetted surface areas are often employed to achieve a large mass of flow rate from the fuel grain. Such fuel grain configurations may be difficult to manufacture and require an undesired increase in overall size of the hybrid rocket engine.
Aspects of the current subject matter include various embodiments of a vortex hybrid motor. In one aspect, a vortex hybrid motor is described that may include a housing having a proximal end, a distal end, and a sidewall extending between the proximal end and the distal end. The vortex hybrid motor may further include a fuel core positioned within the housing and configured to react with an oxidizer to thereby create a thrust sufficient to propel at least the vortex hybrid motor. In addition, the vortex hybrid motor may include a first injection port positioned proximate to the sidewall and configured to deliver a first amount of the oxidizer into the housing in a direction that is approximately tangent to the sidewall. Additionally, the vortex hybrid motor may include a second injection port positioned proximate to the proximal end of the housing and configured to deliver a second amount of the oxidizer into a center of the housing.
In some variations one or more of the following features can optionally be included in any feasible combination. The fuel core may define at least a part of a combustion zone. The combustion zone may include an upper zone and a central zone, and the upper zone may be proximal to the central zone and in communication with the first injection port. The central zone may extend through a part of the fuel core and along a longitudinal axis of the housing, and the second injection port may be configured to deliver the second amount of the oxidizer into the central zone. The fuel core may include a fuel gradient having a fuel density that varies radially along the fuel core. A first part of the fuel core may include a fuel additive. The fuel additive may include one or more of a magnesium, an aluminum, a ferrocene, and a catocene material. The fuel core may include a support structure. The support structure may include a honeycomb configuration. The housing may further include a nozzle at a distal end of the housing, and a proximal end of the nozzle may extend into the fuel core.
In another interrelated aspect of the current subject matter, a method includes delivering a first amount of an oxidizer into a housing of a vortex hybrid motor. The vortex hybrid motor may include a fuel core positioned within the housing and configured to react with the first amount of the oxidizer to thereby create a thrust sufficient to propel at least the vortex hybrid motor. The first amount of the oxidizer may be delivered from a first injection port positioned proximate to a sidewall of the housing and configured to deliver the first amount in a direction tangent to the sidewall. The method may further include delivering a second amount of the oxidizer into the housing, and the second amount may be delivered from a second injection port positioned proximate to a proximal end of the housing and configured to deliver the second amount approximately collinear with a longitudinal axis of the vortex hybrid motor.
The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, show certain aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein and, together with the description, help explain some of the principles associated with the disclosed implementations. In the drawings,
When practical, similar reference numbers denote similar structures, features, or elements.
Various embodiments of a vortex hybrid motor are described herein that can be included in various propulsion systems, such as vortex hybrid rockets. In some embodiments, the vortex hybrid motor can include an outer housing that can house a fuel core configured to react with an oxidizer for creating a desired thrust. The fuel core may be solid and include a variety of materials, including rubbers, plastics, waxes, metal powders (such as aluminum, magnesium, aluminum hydride, and boron), carbon, and additively manufactured versions of these fuels. Other fuel core materials are within the scope of this disclosure. The vortex hybrid motor may also include at least one injection port in communication with at least one injector and storage compartment for containing oxidizer configured to react with the fuel core. For example, the oxidizer may be in liquid form and include liquid oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, nitrous oxide, and/or nitric acid; however, other oxidizers are within the scope of this disclosure. As such, upon delivery of the oxidizer into the vortex hybrid motor via the at least one injection port, the oxidizer may react with the fuel core (e.g., ignite) to create a desired thrust and propel the propulsion system.
The vortex hybrid motor includes a space defining a combustion zone where the oxidizer may be introduced and allowed to react with the fuel core, thereby creating thrust. In some embodiments, the combustion zone is defined by the fuel core and/or the housing and may also include an upper zone and a central zone that each contribute to the created thrust, as will be described in greater detail below. The vortex hybrid motor may also include a tapered nozzle that is in communication with the combustion zone and provides an opening through a distal end of the housing.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, at least one injection port may deliver oxidizer in a direction tangential to a circumference of an inner cylindrical surface of a sidewall of the vortex hybrid motor housing. This tangential injection can cause a flow of oxidizer in the combustion zone to swirl. The flow may inherently translate inwardly to the center of the vortex hybrid motor where the flow moves spirally away from a closed proximal end of the housing, down the core of the combustion zone and out the tapered nozzle. Such flow may be created by injecting the oxidizer into a generally cylindrical combustion zone that is closed at a proximal end and in communication with a converging nozzle at a distal end of the housing.
The vortex hybrid motors described herein may include at least one feature that provides an improvement and/or benefit over at least some vortex hybrid motors. For example, in some embodiments of the vortex hybrid motor described herein, an injection port configuration is described that includes side injection ports for delivering oxidizer in a direction tangential to the inner cylindrical surface of the sidewall of the housing and a proximal injection port that may be controlled for modulating a delivery of an amount of the oxidizer directly into a center of the combustion zone. This may assist with efficiently and effectively adjusting an oxidizer-to-fuel ratio in the combustion zone for achieving a desired thrust.
In some embodiments of the vortex hybrid motor described herein, a fuel core and combustion zone configuration is described that provides rapid ignition and vigorous combustion to thereby provide high thrust. In some embodiments of the vortex hybrid motor described herein, a fuel core configuration is described that provides radially varying gradients of fuel in order to achieve desired thrust profiles. For example, such thrust profiles can include a shorter initial high thrust segment followed by a longer segment of lower thrust. Some thrust profiles can include additional high thrust segments, such as at the end of the lower thrust segment. Various fuel core configurations are described and within the scope of this disclosure.
The vortex hybrid motor 100 may also include a fuel core 112 that fills a part of the housing 102 and defines a part of a combustion zone 114. As discussed above, the combustion zone 114 includes a space within the vortex hybrid motor 100 where oxidizer 116 may be introduced for reacting with the fuel core 112 thereby creating thrust. The combustion zone 114 can include one or more of a variety of shapes and sizes for achieving a variety of thrust profiles, as will be discussed in greater detail below. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, at least one side injection port 130 may be positioned along the portion of the sidewall 108 defining the disc-shaped chamber 128, thereby allowing oxidizer 116 to be introduced directly into the upper zone 118 of the combustion zone 114. The one or more side injection ports 130 may be configured to direct a first amount of the oxidizer 116 at a direction that is tangential to the circumference of the inner cylindrical surface of the sidewall 108 of the housing 102. This can assist with creating swirling of the oxidizer 116 within the combustion zone 114, including the upper zone 118 and/or the central zone 120, as shown in
In addition, the vortex hybrid motor may also include a proximal injection port 132 positioned along the proximal end 104 of the housing, as shown in
For example, as the central zone 120 of the combustion zone 114 reacts over time with oxidizer 116 injected into the vortex hybrid motor 100, the radius of the central zone 120 (or cylindrical chamber 126) increases, thereby increasing the surface area of the fuel core 112 that the oxidizer may react with. As such, the oxidizer-to-fuel ratio may change over time as the oxidizer 116 is added to the combustion zone 114. The proximal injection port 132 thus may provide the benefit of efficiently and effectively adjusting the oxidizer-to-fuel ratio by directly injecting oxidizer into the central zone 120 of the combustion zone 114 in order to optimize the oxidizer-to-fuel ratio for maximum specific impulse, which can include a measure of how efficiently the combustion of oxidizer and fuel generates thrust. The pressure in the combustion zone may be used as a measure of when and how much oxidizer to deliver from the proximal injection port 132.
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, a fuel mixture may be added to the channels 240, such as by pouring a liquid fuel mixture in the channels 240 of the support structure 238 and allowing the fuel mixture to cure, thereby forming the fuel core 212.
The support structure 238 may provide a variety of benefits, such as added structural support to the solid fuel of the fuel core 212 to thereby limit or prevent fuel from moving around inside the vortex hybrid motor. Additionally, the support structure 238 may provide an increased roughness of fuel surface along the fuel core 212 as it burns thereby allowing for an increase in heat transfer to the fuel surface for increasing the fuel burning rate within the vortex hybrid motor.
As shown in
In the descriptions above and in the claims, phrases such as “at least one of” or “one or more of” may occur followed by a conjunctive list of elements or features. The term “and/or” may also occur in a list of two or more elements or features. Unless otherwise implicitly or explicitly contradicted by the context in which it is used, such a phrase is intended to mean any of the listed elements or features individually or any of the recited elements or features in combination with any of the other recited elements or features. For example, the phrases “at least one of A and B;” “one or more of A and B;” and “A and/or B” are each intended to mean “A alone, B alone, or A and B together.” A similar interpretation is also intended for lists including three or more items. For example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C;” “one or more of A, B, and C;” and “A, B, and/or C” are each intended to mean “A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A and B and C together.” Use of the term “based on,” above and in the claims is intended to mean, “based at least in part on,” such that an unrecited feature or element is also permissible.
The implementations set forth in the foregoing description do not represent all implementations consistent with the subject matter described herein. Instead, they are merely some examples consistent with aspects related to the described subject matter. Although a few variations have been described in detail herein, other modifications or additions are possible. In particular, further features and/or variations can be provided in addition to those set forth herein. For example, the implementations described above can be directed to various combinations and sub-combinations of the disclosed features and/or combinations and sub-combinations of one or more features further to those disclosed herein. In addition, the logic flows depicted in the accompanying figures and/or described herein do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. The scope of the following claims may include other implementations or embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3059429 | Bjerklie et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3091520 | Newburn | May 1963 | A |
3115007 | Fox | Dec 1963 | A |
3135703 | Macdonald | Jun 1964 | A |
3158997 | Blackman et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3177657 | Strauss | Apr 1965 | A |
3201973 | Fitzgerald | Aug 1965 | A |
3315472 | Moutet | Apr 1967 | A |
3368353 | Allport | Feb 1968 | A |
3426534 | Murphy | Feb 1969 | A |
3560407 | McCormick | Feb 1971 | A |
3618324 | Munding | Nov 1971 | A |
3640072 | Kayser | Feb 1972 | A |
3648461 | Bailey | Mar 1972 | A |
3695041 | Eggers et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3712059 | Drexhage | Jan 1973 | A |
3715888 | Massie et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3768253 | Drawbaugh | Oct 1973 | A |
3773462 | Waeselynck | Nov 1973 | A |
3871828 | Ellion et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3899815 | Maddox | Aug 1975 | A |
3956885 | Davis et al. | May 1976 | A |
4069664 | Ellion et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4322946 | Murch et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4811556 | Lau et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817890 | Coffinberry | Apr 1989 | A |
4840025 | Coffinberry | Jun 1989 | A |
4841723 | Lau et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5010730 | Knuth et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5101623 | Briley | Apr 1992 | A |
5107129 | Lombrozo et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5319926 | Steenborg | Jun 1994 | A |
5367872 | Lund et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372070 | Neidert et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5404715 | Vuillamy et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5529648 | Stickler et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5582001 | Bradford et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5622046 | Michaels et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5715675 | Smith | Feb 1998 | A |
5794435 | Jones et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799902 | Keith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819526 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6073437 | Jones et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101808 | Knuth et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6135393 | Sackheim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6272846 | Schneider | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298659 | Knuth et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311477 | Schneider | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6354074 | Jones et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6590403 | Gramer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601380 | Knuth | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6865878 | Knuth et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7770380 | Dulligan et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
9038368 | Fuller | May 2015 | B2 |
9458796 | Chen | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20010022954 | Sakashita et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020036038 | Karabeyoglu | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020069636 | Knuth | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040068976 | Knuth et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040197247 | Lohner et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070074501 | Oren | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070144140 | Sarigul-Klijn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080056961 | Matveev | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090031700 | Karabeyoglu | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090217525 | Fuller et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217642 | Fuller et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120060464 | Grote et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130031888 | Fuller | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130042596 | Fuller | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140026537 | Eilers et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140123654 | Kemmerer et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140260305 | Hobbs et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140352276 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20180118634 | Sherman et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180156159 | Adriany | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180334996 | Chew et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
110118136 | Aug 2019 | CN |
H07 310594 | Nov 1995 | JP |
WO-2020076975 | Apr 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zandbergen, Some Typical Solid Propellant Rocket Motors, Dec. 2013, Delft University of Technology, pp. 4-6 (Year: 2013). |
Bath, Andrew, Performance Characterization of Complex Fuel Port Geometries for Hybrid Rocket Fuel Grains, Dec. 2012, Utah State University, pp. 13-14 (Year: 2012). |
Brinkley, A. et al. (2015). Development and test of a 90% H2O2/Kerosene decent thruster for the rocket City Space Pioneer's Google X Prize Lunar Landerz. Dynetics Inc., 25 pages. |
Cervone, A. et al. (2015) “Development of Hydrogen Peroxide Monopropellant Rockets,” AIAA. 11 pages. |
Chemical and Material Sciences Department, Research Division. Hydrogen Peroxide Handbook, Technical Report AFRPL-TR-67-144. Rocketdyne, a Division of North American Aviation, Inc., 1967. 488 pages. |
Fletcher-Wood, R. (2016) “Hydrazine,” 2016, RSC Education. 3 pages. |
Jonker, W.A., et al. (2011). Development of a Rocket Engine Igniter Using the Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide. TNO Science and Industry, 6 pages. |
Krishnan, S., Ahn, S., & Lee, C. (2010). Design and Development of a Hydrogen-Peroxide Rocket Engine Facility. 10 pages. oai:generic.eprints.org:7057/core392. |
Lee, S-L. et al. (Jan. 2009, e-published Apr. 24, 2008). “Performance characteristics of silver catalyst bed for hydrogen peroxide.” Aerospace Science and Technology,13, 12-17. |
Love, J. E., & Stillwell, W. H. (1959). The hydrogen-peroxide rocket reaction-control system for the X-1B research airplane. Tech Note D-185. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 30 pages. |
Maia, F.F. et al. (2014). “Development and Optimization of a Catalytic Thruster for Hydrogen Peroxide Decomposition.” Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 6, 61-67. |
McCormick, J.C. (1965). Hydrogen Peroxide Rocket Manual. FMC Corporation. Propulsion Department, 220 pages. |
Othman, N. et al. (2011). “Design and Testing of a 50N Hydrogen Peroxide Monopropellant Rocket Thruster.” Jurnal Mekanikal. 33(2):70-81. |
Palmer, M., Musker, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). Experimental Assessment of Heterogeneous Catalysts forthe Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide. 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. 9 pages. doi:10.2514/6.2011-5695. |
Ventura, M., Wernimont, E., Heister, S., & Yuan, S. (2007). Rocket Grade Hydrogen Peroxide (RGHP) for use in Propulsion and Power Devices—Historical Discussion of Hazards. 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. 22 pages. doi:10.2514/6.2007-5468. |
Wernimont, E., & Durant, D. (2004). State of the Art High Performance Hydrogen Peroxide Catalyst Beds. 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 7 pages. doi:10.2514/6.2004-4147. |
Wernimont, E.J. et al. (1999). “Past and Present Uses of Rocket Grade Hydrogen Peroxide.” 2nd International Hydrogen Peroxide Propulsion Conference, 15 pages. |
Wieling, W., Zandbergen, B.T.C., Mayer, A, & Schrijer, F. (2012). Development of a Hydrogen Peroxide/Ethanol Thruster forthe Advanced Re-entry Vehicle. Space Propulsion 2012. 11 pages. |
Willis, C.M. (1960). The Effect of Catalyst-Bed Arrangement on Thrust Buildup and Decay Time for a 90 Percent Hydrogen Peroxide Control Rocket. Tech Note D-516, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 39 pages. |
Palmer, M. J. (2014). Experimental evaluation of hydrogen peroxide catalysts for monopropellant attitude control thrusters. University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics Group, PhD Thesis. 271 pages. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/385352/. |
Ryan, H.M. et al. (Jan.-Feb. 1995). “Atomization Characteristics of Impinging Liquid Jets.” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 11:1, 135-145. |
“Mesh and Micron Sizes” ISM Industrial Specialties Mfg. & IS MED Specialties, Mar. 11, 2020, pp. 1-7. (Year: 2020). |
Messineo et al. (2018). “Introduction to Resistor-Based sensors for Feedback Control of Hybrid Rocket Engines”, Publication Jun. 2018, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2018). |
Messineo et al. (2019). “Theoretical Investigation on Feedback Control of Hybrid Rocket Engines, Institute of Space and Astronautical Science”, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Published Jun. 3, 2019, pp. 1-51, (Year: 2019). |
Thomas et al. (2015). “Enhancement of Regression Rates in Hybrid Rockets with HTPB Fuel Grains by Metallic Additives”, AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum, Jul. 27-29, 2015, pp. 1-16 (Year: 2015). |
Haq, N. Ui, et al. (2017). “Design, Development and Testing of 1N Hydrogen Peroxide Thruster.” 2017 14th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST). IEEE, 2017. pp. 599-607. |
Neumaier, W.W. et al. (2012). “Development of a 90% Hydrogen Peroxide Mono-Propellant Propulsion System for the Warm Gas Test Article.” 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. 2012. pp. 1-11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200116106 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |