The present invention relates generally to an improved vacuum cleaner nozzle. More specifically, the present invention relates to an improved toroidal vortex vacuum cleaner nozzle that reduces parasitic plume formation. Thus, the present invention advances upon the ability of a toroidal vortex vacuum system to attract fine particulate matter.
A toroidal vortex is a donut of rotating fluid. The most common example is a smoke ring. It is basically a self-sustaining natural phenomenon.
The toroidal vortex nozzles disclosed herein were developed from the technology embodied in toroidal vortex attractors previously described in Applicants' application entitled “Toroidal and Compound Vortex Attractor,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Air pressure within outer housing 902 is below ambient pressure. The pressure difference between ambient air and air within outer housing 902 is maintained by the curved airflow around the lower, outer edge of inner shroud 905. Here, the downward flow between inner shroud 905 and outer housing 902 is guided into a horizontal flow between inner shroud and attracted surface 907. This pressure difference is given by ρv2/r where v is the speed of air 908 circulating around inner shroud 905, r is radius of curvature 909 of the airflow, and ρ is the air density. The maximum air pressure differential, which depends upon the centrifugal pump blade tip speed V at point 910 and tip radius 911 R, is given by the equation ρV2/R.
Toroidal vortex attractor 900 can be thought of as a vacuum cleaner without a dust collection system. Dust particles are picked up from attracted surface 907 by the high speed, low pressure airflow. Because no dust collection system is provided, the dust particles circulate within toroidal vortex attractor 900.
Likewise, the toroidal vortex vacuum cleaner is a bagless design in which airflow is contained. Air continually circulates from the area being cleaned, through the dust collector, and back to the area being cleaned. Specifically, the contained airflow circulates from a vacuum cleaner nozzle, to a centrifugal separator, and back to the nozzle. A centrifugal dust separator may be used such as the one disclosed in Applicants' application Ser. No. 10/025,376, entitled “Toroidal Vortex Vacuum Cleaner Centrifugal Dust Separator,” filed Dec. 19, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,719,830, which is herein incorporated by reference. Since dust is not always fully separated, some dust will remain in the airstream heading back toward the nozzle. The air already within the system, however, does not leave the system, thereby preventing dust from escaping into the atmosphere. In addition to ensuring an essentially sealed operation while the nozzle contacts a surface, the toroidal vortex vacuum cleaner's operation also remains sealed when away from a surface. Sealed operation away from a surface is important because it prevents the vacuum cleaner nozzle from blowing surface dust around and from ejecting unseparated dust into the atmosphere.
Applicants' toroidal vortex attractor is coaxial and operates such that air is blown out of an annular duct and returned into a central duct. This direction of airflow is necessary for correct operation of the toroidal vortex attractor. To demonstrate the effects of the reverse airflow,
The simple concentric nozzle system shown in
The vortex nozzle in its basic form is circular in cross-section, but it may take on other shapes.
Toroidal vortex vacuum cleaner 1500 may utilize circular nozzle 1506, but the system works equally well with rectangular nozzle 1400 of
Airflow across toroidal vortex nozzle 1506 from outside the system will become entrained with the internal airflow due to air friction effects to form a “plume” of air that is deleterious to the vacuum nozzle action. The effect is illustrated in
Plume formation is not affected by internal pressures within the nozzle. Generally speaking, the pressure in the center of the tube formed by inner donut 1601 is below atmospheric pressure whereas the pressure in the air flowing down between outer tube 1602 and inner donut 1601 is above atmospheric pressure. This air follows the curve at the bottom of inner donut 1601 regardless of internal pressures providing that the amount of air flowing up within inner donut 1601 is exactly the same as that flowing down between inner donut 1601 and outer tube 1602. Air plume 1604 is undesirable because although it contains only the concentration of dust present in the local environment, it will blow away dust underneath the nozzle.
Thus, there is a clear need for a simple vortex vacuum cleaner nozzle that addresses the problem of plume formation.
The present invention was developed from matter disclosed in Applicants' application Ser. No. 09/835,084 entitled “Toroidal Vortex Bagless Vacuum Cleaner,” filed Apr. 13, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,687,951, which is incorporated herein by reference. The bagless vacuum cleaner of this invention was developed from technology disclosed in the application Ser. No. 09/829,416 entitled “Toroidal and Compound Vortex Attractor,” filed Apr. 9, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,729,839, which is incorporated herein by reference. These attractors stem from technology disclosed in the application Ser. No. 09/728,602 entitled “Lifting Platform,” filed on Dec. 1, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,616,094, which is incorporated herein by reference. Finally, the lifting platform technology is based upon technology disclosed in application Ser. No. 09/316,318 entitled “Vortex Attractor,” filed May 21, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,753, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Described herein are embodiments of toroidal vortex vacuum cleaner nozzles that address the problem of plume formation. Plumes form as a result of air friction entraining outside air into the flow across the nozzle opening. While the specification refers to air as the preferred fluid, the present invention is capable of operation in most any fluid.
Pluming may be reduced or eliminated by allowing some of the air within the nozzle to escape into the atmosphere, and allowing a small amount of outside air to enter into the system. Because the nozzle is utilized in a vacuum cleaner application, it is preferable to vent air that contains as little dust as possible.
When the outer tube of the system is vented, the amount of air passing down between inner tube and outer tube is less than the amount of air flowing up the center of inner tube. This difference is compensated by air from the atmosphere drawn across and into the nozzle. Hence, the air plume can be eliminated at the price of allowing some internal air to escape.
Given are two examples of vent configurations for venting air while retaining dust. The outer tube comprises a hole, while a bulge is disposed in the inside of outer tube upstream from the hole. Because of its low mass, air flowing between outer and inner tube can change direction quickly enough to escape from the hole. Dust (or other particulate matter), because of its mass, cannot change direction quickly enough and travels downstream past hole and bounces off the bulge on inner wall of the outer tube.
Alternatively, the thickness of the outer tube can be thinned beneath a hole disposed thereon. Again, the air can escape, but the dust is forced to bounce off the thinned outer wall.
Of course, these are just two of many possible configurations. Any design that accomplishes the goal of retaining dust while allowing air to vent is contemplated. Furthermore, other means to allow some of the interior air in a toroidal vacuum nozzle, and associated system, may be implemented without departing from the principles of the invention.
Furthermore, the vents may be designed such that the vent size is controllable. This allows the vacuum cleaner to be instantly modified for different situations in which different types of matter are to be vacuumed.
Preferably, the toroidal vortex nozzle is implemented into a vacuum cleaner system. Generally, the nozzle takes in dust-laden air in through the inner tube, and dust-free air is delivered back to the annulus between the inner and outer tubes. More specifically, dust-laden air taken in through an inner tubing is sucked into impeller blades. The blades accelerate incoming air into a circular pattern inducing the cylindrical vortex flow in a separation chamber. Inside the separation chamber, dirt and debris are centrifugally separated. The cleaned air is then driven into an annulus formed by the gap between the inner and outer tubes. Straightening vanes in the annulus eliminate rotational components within the airflow. This straightened airflow is essential for a toroidal vortex nozzle to perform optimally. If air is rotating, a significant amount of air can be expelled from the annulus into the atmosphere, thus compromising the efficiency of the nozzle.
One of the main features of a vacuum cleaner system utilizing a toroidal vortex nozzle is the inherent low power consumption. The efficiency losses that exist when bags or filters are utilized are eliminated. Bags and filters resist airflow, thus requiring greater power to maintain a proper flowrate. Additional efficiency arises from the closed air system. Kinetic energy supplied by the impeller is not lost with air that is expelled into the atmosphere. Since air is not expelled, the kinetic energy of moving airflow remains within the system. Energy losses are minimized by smoothly directing airflow through the nozzle of the present invention. Hence, the disclosed system utilizes advancements in efficiency not previously considered in the art. In addition, vacuum cleaner designs utilizing nozzles of the present invention are virtually maintenance free.
It is an object of the present invention to provide toroidal vortex vacuum cleaner nozzles.
Also, it is an object of the present invention to provide toroidal vortex vacuum nozzles that do not form a plume.
Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide an efficient vacuum cleaner nozzle.
Furthermore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a quiet vacuum cleaner nozzle.
In addition, it is an object of the present invention to provide a low-maintenance vacuum cleaner nozzle.
Also, it is an object of the present invention to facilitate an efficient, bagless vacuum cleaner.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a nozzle that does not blow away particulate matter in the vicinity of the nozzle.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a straightened airflow to a vacuum cleaner nozzle.
Furthermore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a nozzle which maintains a virtually sealed operation.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a vacuum cleaner nozzle and/or system capable of attracting small particulate matter.
These and other objects will become readily apparent to one skilled in the art upon review of the following description, figures, and claims.
A further understanding of the present invention can be obtained by reference to a preferred embodiment set forth in the illustrations of the accompanying drawings. Although the illustrated embodiment is merely exemplary of systems for carrying out the present invention, both the organization and method of operation of the invention, in general, together with further objectives and advantages thereof, may be more easily understood by reference to the drawings and the following description. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of this invention, which is set forth with particularity in the claims as appended or as subsequently amended, but merely to clarify and exemplify the invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following drawings in which:
As required, a detailed illustrative embodiment of the present invention is disclosed herein. However, techniques, systems, and operating structures in accordance with the present invention may be embodied in a wide variety of forms and modes, some of which may be quite different from those in the disclosed embodiment. Consequently, the specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely representative, yet in that regard, they are deemed to afford the best embodiment for purposes of disclosure and to provide a basis for the claims herein which define the scope of the present invention. The following presents a detailed description of a preferred embodiment (as well as some alternative embodiments) of the present invention and features thereof.
As discussed above, air from the atmosphere below a toroidal vortex nozzle will become entrained with the internal airflow due to air friction effects to form a “plume” of air that is deleterious to the vacuum nozzle action. Pluming may be reduced or eliminated by allowing some of the air within the nozzle, or associated system, to escape into the atmosphere.
In an alternate system shown in
Although these are two possible configurations of vents to allow some of the air to escape from inside the nozzle, and associated systems, other vent designs are possible to accomplish the same objective. Furthermore, other means to allow some of the interior air in a toroidal vacuum nozzle, and associated system, may be implemented without departing from the principles of the invention.
Importantly, these vents permit small amounts of airflow to escape, therefore minimally compromising the efficiency of the vacuum cleaner system. Furthermore, the usage of these vents is not necessary in all situations. However, venting adapts the vacuum cleaner system to perform optimally in situations involving very fine dust particles. Additionally, the vents may be designed such that the vent size is controllable. This allows the vacuum to be instantly modified for different situations in which different types of matter are to be vacuumed.
The description thus far has described toroidal vortex nozzles in which all of the air passing through the system travels around the nozzle opening without escaping into or mixing with the outer air. Where problems have arisen due to outer air being drawn across the nozzle to form a plume, they have been dealt with by allowing some of the air within the system to escape. There are occasions, however, when the nozzle opening can be widened past the point where airflow can be maintained within the system unless the flow geometry is maintained by an outside surface.
The toroidal vortex nozzle avoids this problem. The airflow through nozzle 2100 is shown in
Additional adjustments may be made to adopt the nozzle for specific situations.
While the present invention has been described with reference to one or more preferred embodiments, which embodiments have been set forth in considerable detail for the purposes of making a complete disclosure of the invention, such embodiments are merely exemplary and are not intended to be limiting or represent an exhaustive enumeration of all aspects of the invention. The scope of the invention, therefore, shall be defined solely by the following claims. Further, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that numerous changes may be made in such details without departing from the spirit and the principles of the invention.
This application is filed as a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/025,376 entitled “Toroidal Vortex Vacuum Cleaner Centrifugal Dust Separator,” filed Dec. 19, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,719,830, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/835,084 entitled “Toroidal Vortex Bagless Vacuum Cleaner,” filed Apr. 13, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,687,951, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/829,416 entitled “Toroidal and Compound Vortex Attractor,” filed Apr. 9, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6.729,839, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/728,602, filed Dec. 1, 2000, entitled “Lifting Platform,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,616,094, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/316,318, filed May 21, 1999, entitled “Vortex Attractor now U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,753.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2769997 | Sheahan | Nov 1956 | A |
3238557 | Foster | Mar 1966 | A |
4366594 | Hyams | Jan 1983 | A |
4570287 | Kerschner et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4884315 | Ehnert | Dec 1989 | A |
4953255 | Jenkins | Sep 1990 | A |
5884360 | Palffy | Mar 1999 | A |
6687951 | Illingworth et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689225 | Illingworth | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6719830 | Illingworth et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6811687 | Illingworth | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6957472 | Illingworth et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
661573 | Jun 1938 | DE |
0501675 | Sep 1992 | EP |
WO0019881 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040069145 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10025376 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10457112 | US | |
Parent | 09835084 | Apr 2001 | US |
Child | 10025376 | US | |
Parent | 09829416 | Apr 2001 | US |
Child | 09835084 | US | |
Parent | 09728602 | Dec 2000 | US |
Child | 09829416 | US | |
Parent | 09316318 | May 1999 | US |
Child | 09728602 | US |