This application is related to co-pending patent application entitled “BUOYANCY DISSIPATER AND METHOD TO DETER AN ERRANT VESSEL” filed Jan. 30, 2009 having Ser. No. 12/362,547 which is incorporated herein by reference.
This application is related to co-pending patent application entitled “BUOYANCY DISSIPATER AND METHOD TO DETER AN ERRANT VESSEL” filed Feb. 2, 2010 having Ser. No. 12/698,611 which is incorporated herein by reference.
This application is related to patent application entitled “BUBBLE WEAPON SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING MOVEMENT AND DISRUPTING OPERATIONS OF VESSELS” Ser. No. 12/770,890 filed concurrently herewith and incorporated herein by reference.
Embodiments pertain to diffusers for buoyancy dissipaters and methods for generating vortices. Some embodiments pertain to inhibiting movement of vessels by buoyancy reduction of water. Some embodiments pertain to harbor security. Some embodiments pertain to controlling lethality levels of a non-lethal interdiction weapon (NLIW).
Buoyancy reduction of water can be used to inhibit motion of an errant vessel as well as disrupt operations of the vessel by generating an expanding gas bubble or bubble plume near or under the vessel. One issue with buoyancy reduction is controlling the size, shape, and intensity of the expanding gas bubble or bubble plume. By controlling the size, shape, and intensity of the expanding gas bubble or bubble plume, the lethality level may be controlled. This is particularly beneficial in situations in which an errant vessel needs to be stopped without injury to the persons on board.
Thus, there are general needs for apparatus that can control the size, shape, and intensity of the expanding gas bubble or bubble plume as well as a method to control the lethality level of the buoyancy reduction.
The following description and the drawings sufficiently illustrate specific embodiments to enable those skilled in the art to practice them. Other embodiments may incorporate structural, logical, electrical, process, and other changes. Portions and features of some embodiments may be included in, or substituted for, those of other embodiments. Embodiments set forth in the claims encompass all available equivalents of those claims.
In these embodiments, blocking one or more of the diffusion ports 102 may inhibit the mass flow rate and may serve to delay the diffusion event (e.g., the generation of a bubble plume). A high rate of gas flow with less gas may also be provided. In this way vortex intensity and bubble diameter of bubbles of the bubble plume may be maintained. In some embodiments, the reduction sleeve 104 may be configured to block of a predetermined portion of the diffusion ports 102 when diffusion reduction is selected.
In some embodiments, the vortice-amplified diffuser section 100 may include one or more thrusting ports 110 provided at an end of the vortice-amplified diffuser section 100. The one or more thrusting ports 110 may be configured to generate thrust. In some embodiments described in more detail below, the thrusting ports 110 may be provided behind nose-cone fairing 114.
In the embodiments of the vortice-amplified diffuser section 100 illustrated in
As illustrated in
In some of these embodiments, the reduction sleeve 104 may be internal and on the inside with respect to the diffusion ports 102, although this is not a requirement. In other embodiments, the reduction sleeve 104 may be external and on the outside with respect to the diffusion ports 102. In some embodiments, the reduction sleeve 104 may be clocked to a selected position within the housing 108 to block off a predetermined portion of the diffusion ports 102 for each selected position.
In some embodiments, the diffusion ports 102 may be provided circumferentially around a primary full sleeve, and the reduction sleeve 104 may comprise a secondary half-sleeve that is rotatable within the primary full sleeve to block off a portion of the diffusion ports 102 to reduce the diffusion flow.
In some of these embodiments, the vortice-amplified diffuser section 100 utilizes a manual sleeve setting to adjust the number of open diffusion ports 102 to reduce the mass flow rate by controlling the mass flow exit area. The reduction sleeve 104 may be used in conjunction with the vortex generators 106 to restrict and intensify the expanding gas locally. In these embodiments, the bubble plume of expanding gas may be shaped by changing which diffusion ports 102 are used as well as restricting the mass flow rate.
In some embodiments, a first portion of the diffusion ports 102 may include vortex generators 106 that are angled to generate vortices 112 with a clockwise rotation and a second portion of the diffusion ports 102 may include vortex generators 106 angled to generate vortices 112 with a counterclockwise rotation. In these embodiments, the diffusion ports 102 that generate vortices 112 with the clockwise rotation and the diffusion ports 102 that generate vortices 112 with the counterclockwise rotation may be provided in an alternating fashion circumferentially around the vortice-amplified diffuser section 100. The alternating of the rotation of the vortices 112 may help offset any torque induced by rotation of the vortices 112.
Although
Referring to
In some of these embodiments, the thrusting ports 110 may be provided behind a nose cone fairing 114 of the buoyancy dissipater. These embodiments are described in more detail below.
As illustrated in
In some of these embodiments, the nose cone fairing 114 may be configured to be blown-off by the expanding gas that is provided through the one or more thrusting ports 110. In some alternate embodiments, the nose cone fairing 114 may comprise vent-holes 302 to allow the expanding gas from the thrusting ports 110 to exit the nose cone fairing 114 for generating thrust. In these alternate embodiments, the nose cone fairing 114 is not configured to be blown-off by the expanding gas that is provided through the one or more thrusting ports 110. In some of these alternate embodiments, the vent-holes 302 may be aligned with the trusting ports 110 although this is not a requirement.
In some of these embodiments, the one or more thrusting ports 110 may be reverse-thrusting ports and provided circumferentially within the nose cone fairing 114 of the buoyancy dissipater 300. In these embodiments, the reverse-thrusting ports are provided on a front end of the buoyancy dissipater.
In some embodiments, vortice-amplified diffuser section 100 may include diffusion control circuitry to control the position of the reduction sleeve 104 (
In some embodiments, the reduction sleeve 104 may be manually positionable. The position may remain fixed after the buoyancy dissipater 300 is deployed.
In accordance with these embodiments, the diffuser control circuitry 504 may provide diffuser control signals 503 to configure the configurable diffuser section 502 to adjust the amount of diffusion flow through the diffusion ports 102 (
In some embodiments, the diffuser control signals 503 may further configure the configurable diffuser section 502 to operate in either a thrust-engaged configuration or a thrust-neutral configuration by controlling the opening or closing of thrusting ports 110 (
In some embodiments, the buoyancy dissipater 500 may also include propellant charge-size control circuitry 506 to vary a charge size to control an amount of propellant 508 that is ignited in order to vary an amount of gas generated when generating a bubble plume. In some embodiments, the buoyancy dissipater 500 may also include control circuitry 510 to control the operations of the buoyancy dissipater 500. In some embodiments, the buoyancy dissipater 500 may also include one or more optional proximity sensors 512 to detect the proximity of a vessel. In some embodiments, the buoyancy dissipater 500 may also include an on-board navigation system 514 and accompanying sensors for use in navigating through water. In some embodiments, the buoyancy dissipater 500 may also include a wireless or wired receiver 516 for receiving command and control signals. In some embodiments, the buoyancy dissipater 500 may also include a transceiver, to transmit images, location or other data.
In response to a discharge signal 507, the propellant 508 may be ignited within the pressure vessel section 120 (
In some embodiments, the buoyancy dissipater described in the U.S. patent application, entitled “BUOYANCY DISSIPATER AND METHOD TO DETER AN ERRANT VESSEL” filed Jan. 30, 2009 having Ser. No. 12/362,547 and which is incorporated, herein by reference, may be suitable for use as any one of the buoyancy dissipaters described herein. In some embodiments, the bubble weapon described in patent application entitled “BUBBLE WEAPON SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING MOVEMENT AND DISRUPTING OPERATIONS OF VESSELS” having filed concurrently herewith and which is incorporated herein by reference may be suitable for use as buoyancy dissipater 500.
Although buoyancy dissipater 500 is illustrated as having several separate functional elements, one or more of the functional elements may be combined and may be implemented by combinations of software-configured elements, such as processing elements including digital signal processors (DSPs), and/or other hardware elements. For example, some elements may comprise one or more microprocessors, DSPs, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and combinations of various hardware and logic circuitry for performing at least the functions described herein. In some embodiments, the functional elements may refer to one or more processes operating on one or more processing elements.
In some embodiments, a method for buoyancy reduction is provided. In these embodiments, the method may include generating vortices of gas bubbles below a waterline with a plurality of diffusion ports having vortex generators therein, and adjusting an amount of diffusion flow by blocking off one or more of the diffusion ports with a reduction sleeve. By blocking off one or more of the diffusion ports, at least one of a size, shape, and intensity of an expanding gas bubble is controlled. In some embodiments, generating the vortices may comprise expanding a gas, diffusing the expanding gas through the diffusion ports, and inducing rotation with angled tabs within the diffusion ports. The angled tabs may operate as vortex generators 106 (
The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. Section 1.72(b) requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to limit or interpret the scope or meaning of the claims. The following claims are hereby incorporated into the detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
This invention was not made with United States Government support. The United States Government does not have any rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
923922 | Wratzke | Jun 1909 | A |
1222498 | Steinmetz | Apr 1917 | A |
1947407 | Cornell, Jr. | Feb 1934 | A |
2289318 | Pratt | Jul 1942 | A |
2334211 | Miller | Nov 1943 | A |
2466561 | Standal | Apr 1949 | A |
2557815 | Wheel et al. | Jun 1951 | A |
2693078 | Laucher | Nov 1954 | A |
2713308 | Brown et al. | Jul 1955 | A |
2779281 | Maurice et al. | Jan 1957 | A |
2954750 | Crump et al. | Oct 1960 | A |
2995088 | Asplund | Aug 1961 | A |
3109373 | Saffer et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3316840 | Grand | May 1967 | A |
3358884 | Link | Dec 1967 | A |
3417719 | Nitenson | Dec 1968 | A |
3902425 | Kurtzemann | Sep 1975 | A |
2745369 | Brown et al. | May 1976 | A |
4047668 | DeWeese et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4069021 | Schneider | Jan 1978 | A |
4092943 | Lund et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4188884 | White et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4249673 | Katoh et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
5654523 | Brunn | Aug 1997 | A |
6145459 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164565 | Adee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6186085 | Kato et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6581521 | Dixon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6655313 | Woodall et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6701819 | Williams et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6899290 | Varble et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6938840 | Trutschel et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6962121 | Kuklinski | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7059544 | Leonard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067732 | Kuklinski | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7185588 | Clark et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7730838 | Dupont et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7789009 | Brittingham | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7895948 | Dupont et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020139287 | Chase | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040200374 | Sansolo | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050047870 | Rode | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20100192798 | Dupont et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,547, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 4, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,547, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 29, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,547, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,547, Response filed Jan. 8, 2010 to Adivosry Action mailed Jan. 4, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,547, Response filed Dec. 17, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 29, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,547, Response to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2009”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,611, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2010”, 8 Pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,611, Response filed Sep. 15, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,547, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 28, 2010.”, 4 Pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/770,890 , Response filed Aug. 1, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 30, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/770,890, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 26, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120103424 A1 | May 2012 | US |