The present invention generally relates to shotshells with other applications related to systems requiring similar performance enhancements. In particular, the present invention relates to improvements in wads and/or basewads for shotshells, muzzle loading or specialty centerfire sabots and/or pusher wads, and other systems requiring similar performance characteristics.
Shotshells typically include a tubular body with a primer at one end, a propellant powder ignited by the primer, and a payload such as a series of shot pellets or a slug in front of the propellant powder. Such shotshells further typically include a shotshell wad between the propellant powder and the payload for containing the payload as it moves down barrel after firing. For example,
Accordingly, it can be seen that a need exists for a shotshell cartridge design that addresses the foregoing velocity restrictions and other related and unrelated problems.
Briefly described, the present invention generally relates to improvements in wads and/or basewads for use with various types of invention, including shotshell, centerfire, and rimfire ammunition, muzzle loading sabots, and/or other projectile/ammunition or firing systems that require similar performance characteristics. In one example embodiment, the invention can comprise a wad or basewad having an ignition chamber or tube that can be integrally formed with the wad or basewad or can be attached or affixed thereto. For example, the tube or ignition chamber can be formed with or attached to a basewad extending forwardly therefrom toward a gas obturating wad. Alternatively, the tube or ignition chamber can be mounted to or formed with a gas obturating wad, extending rearwardly toward the primer.
The ignition chamber can be formed in a variety of configurations and sizes, and defines a recess, chamber or cup toward or into which the primer blast is directed. The ignition chamber further can be of a length so as to contact or sealingly engage the primer, or can be spaced from the end of the primer at a location or distance sufficient to substantially direct the primer blast into the recess or chamber defined by the ignition chamber.
Upon firing, the primer blast is directed into the ignition chamber so as to contain the majority of the primer blast for an additional time. This generally aids in expediting ignition of the propellant powder by increasing the local pressure within the ignition chamber. The increased pressure generated by the containment of the primer blast within the ignition chamber or tube helps promote favorable pressure and temperature conditions and direct ember/particulate emission into the trapped propellant to enable quicker propellant ignition. The quicker propellant ignition increases the pressure further (in addition to the gas pressure generated by the primer blast) within the ignition chamber and accordingly provides an added thrust to the projectile of the ammunition system. Such added thrust in turn generally provides extra volume for the propellant to burn, effectively lowering the pressure. This further enables use of faster burning, more efficient powders to achieve higher than normal velocities while maintaining normal operating chamber pressures. Higher velocities can enable use of smaller shot sizes whose energy is more comparable to shot made from denser materials to achieve desired effectiveness. The tube or ignition chamber also can be weakened, such as by cuts or prestressing areas of the tube or ignition chamber, in order to help control and facilitate controlled failure of the tube and expedite ignition of the propellant outside the tube.
Various objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent by to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention is directed to improvements in the performance of ammunition including small arms ammunition such as shotshells, rimfire/centerfire cartridges, and other rounds, as well as for muzzle loading sabots, and other types of ammunition. Accordingly, while the present invention is illustrated herein in various example embodiments including use in shotshells, it will be understood that the wad of the present invention further can be used with a variety of other types and calibers of ammunition. Accordingly, as shown in
As generally illustrated in
In the example embodiment of the present invention illustrated in
In the alternative example embodiment of the present invention illustrated in
It is also possible, as illustrated by the phantom lines 48 shown in
Additionally, while the embodiments shown in
In the initial stages of firing, when the primer blast pressure waves send hot embers into the powder, the tube or ignition chamber 12/12′ (
For example,
As shown by the comparison of
This type of system allows for gains in several distinctive areas related to the performance of ammunition, such as a shotshell. The first most obvious is a gain in velocity. By decreasing the peak pressure experienced in the system, more powder can be loaded to restore the loss of pressure and a significant increase in velocity can result. This immediately provides opportunities for performance improvements on the steel loads commonly used to hunt waterfowl because of environmental concerns. As mentioned earlier steel loads are at a disadvantage because their density is lower than that of lead, meaning that a pellet of lead identical in size and shape to one of steel going the same velocity will have more energy because its mass will be higher. By increasing the speed of the steel load we can restore that missing energy to help compensate for the difference in mass/weight and help bridge the lethality gap between lead and steel shot pellets. It is general knowledge that a hunter needs to use a larger shot size (i.e., 2 shot sizes) when steel is compared to lead to provide equivalent downrange energy. With the present invention, the velocity of a 12 Ga 3″ 1¼ oz steel load has been found to be increased by over 200 fps, which, upon inspection of downrange performance reduces the gap more closely to 1 shot size when steel is used as compared to lead. For example, if you used to use a #4 lead shot size to kill ducks prior to the Federal ban on using lead shot for waterfowl, equivalent energy in conventional shotshells would be with #2 steel but with the present invention, you can now use a #3 steel for equivalent downrange energy which carries the advantage of more pellets in the payload as well.
A second potential gain is in the ability to use faster, cleaner burning powders. Often in magnum loads, and steel loads, very slow burning powder is required to keep the peak pressures within safe operating limits while maintaining desired velocities. These powders often tend to be harder to ignite and leave more undesirable residue in the firearms. Because of the pressure drop associated with the tube/ignition chamber in the system, these loads can use the faster, cleaner burning powders that would otherwise produce unsafe pressure levels. Now, existing loads using the present invention will leave less residue in firearms.
Another gain is in possible powder charge weight savings associated with the use of faster burning powders mentioned above. These powders are often more energetic and require a lower charge weight to achieve the same velocity. Faster burning powders tend to more completely burn vs. slow burning powders, thus increasing efficiency. However, obtaining equal velocities with a faster powder comes at the expense of pressure resulting in a system that is no longer within safe operating pressures. With the help of the present invention, such operating efficiency and safety can be maintained, and thus powder weight savings can be realized. Obviously, powder weight savings directly effects and reduces product cost for greater economical advantage.
Still a further potential benefit is in a felt recoil reduction. Changing the initial payload displacement and the rate of chamber pressure rise has increased the overall time of the interior ballistic cycle. Obtaining similar payload performance over a longer timeframe will change the perception of recoil. The “kick” delivered over a longer timeframe will feel less sharp. This advantage could have significant applications in target loads where often the velocities of the payloads are dictated in the rules such as trap or skeet. Here we can achieve the same velocity at a lower peak pressure by spreading the work done over time providing the shooter with a more comfortable round to fire. With the large number of shotshells fired by one person in typical competitions, the shooter fatigue will be less with reduced recoil.
Given a specific load, any one or a combination of the above discussed advantages can be implemented for enhancing the product in specific applications.
Alternatively, the tube walls could be thickened to increase their ability to withstand pressure of expanding/igniting gases in the ignition chamber for better initial ignition. Additionally, alternate materials that would add strength to the ignition chamber or alternatively provide brittleness to control the consistency of the ignition event further can be used. A variety of materials to make the ignition chamber such as metals, plastics, cellulose based products, etc., are envisioned as being possible. Typically, lower cost materials will be seen as providing a better economic choice, such as high and low density polyethylene or similar materials in preferred initial embodiments.
The wad and/or basewad could also be geometrically designed to couple together by friction as shown in
Still further, alternate ignition chamber geometries can be envisioned to provide either equivalent or enhanced ignition. Instead of a circular cross section, other polygonal or star shaped cross sections may be advantageous for reducing the volume further to obtain greater thrust on the base of the wad. Also, instead of a consistent ignition chamber cross section, a substantially continuous curved surface, such as shown in
For example,
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In another embodiment shown in
In a further embodiment shown in
In operation, the wad 100a can be incorporated into a shotshell or another type of ammunition so that the proximal end 116a of the ignition chamber 102a of the wad generally is aligned with and adjacent a forward end of a primer of an ammunition shell or cartridge. A propellant (not shown) can be contained in the ignition recess 122a and in the base of the shell or cartridge exterior to the ignition tube 120a. Upon ignition of the primer, the primer blast can exit the forward end of the primer and will be received in the ignition chamber 102a. Accordingly, the primer blast will ignite the propellant in the ignition chamber 102a, and the shape of the ignition recess 122a can help focus and contain the primer blast in the ignition chamber, including reducing or compressing the volume of the primer blast, which can foster faster ignition and ignition of more of the propellant within the ignition chamber, and resultingly provide an enhanced initial pressure in the ignition chamber prior to and/or during the ignition of the propellant to the exterior of the ignition chamber.
In one embodiment, the propellant in the ignition chamber also can be different from the propellant exterior to the ignition chamber. For example, one propellant can be a fast-burning propellant that burns more quickly (producing higher initial pressure) and generally burns more completely, and the other propellant can be a relatively slow-burning propellant that may help avoid exceeding pressure tolerances in a chamber of a firearm. The faster burning propellant can be used within the ignition chamber, or outside the ignition chamber, with the slower burning propellant used in the ignition chamber, as needed depending upon the desired burning and performance characteristics of the shotshell or cartridge. In the illustrated embodiments, the ignition chambers 102b, 102c can operate in a similar fashion as the ignition chamber 102a to provide different focusing of the primer blast in the ignition chamber.
As shown in
A first propellant 224 generally can be contained in the ignition tube 216 and a second propellant 226 can be contained in the shell body 202 between the base wad 208 and the payload wad 206 along the exterior of the ignition tube 216. The first propellant 224 and the second propellant 226 can include the same propellant material, or, alternatively, can be different propellant materials. For example, the first propellant 224 can be a slower-burning propellant, and the second propellant 226 can be a relatively faster-burning propellant, or the first propellant can be a faster-burning propellant with the second propellant comprising the slower-burning propellant. The propellant can be otherwise configured and/or arranged without departing from the disclosure.
Exemplary slower burning propellants can include the St. Marks 500 series of powders (e.g., the St. Marks 502 or 504 powders) manufactured by General Dynamics, or the AMS-10, AMS-20, or AMS-30 powders manufactured by Alliant Techsystems Inc. Faster burning propellants can include St. Marks 474 powder manufactured by General Dynamics or other powders with speeds between those of the Alliant 375 to AMS-40 powders manufactured by Alliant Techsystems Inc., for example. These propellants are included by way of example only. Any suitable propellants can be used inside and outside the ignition chamber without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
Any of the features of the various embodiments of the disclosure as discussed above can be combined with, replaced by, or otherwise configured with other features of other embodiments of the disclosure without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Further, it is noted that the ignition chambers of the various embodiments can be incorporated into any suitable style or configuration of ammunition. The wad and shell body styles and configurations described above are included by way of example. Additionally, the ignition chambers of the various embodiments could be formed separately to be affixed to a payload wad, a base wad, or a battery cup, or to be otherwise disposed in a round of ammunition.
Most of the explanations above were directed toward shotshell applications of the present invention. However other applications are envisioned. For example, other types of ammunition could be used, such as a sabot or pusher wad for muzzle loading applications, which could easily incorporate the ignition chamber system according to the present invention into the gas obturating end thereof. Faster burning black powder types could be used to obtain higher velocities than conventional practice. In still further potential embodiments, the primer battery cup could be extended to accomplish the same goal. In such embodiments, the primer battery cup could be configured similar to an open ended flash tube and function similarly to the embodiment shown in
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that while the present invention has been discussed above with respect to particular embodiments of the present invention, various additions, modifications and/or changes can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/548,464, filed Jul. 13, 2012, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/606,447, filed Oct. 27, 2009, which is a formalization of previously filed, co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/108,678, filed Oct. 27, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/113,286, filed Nov. 11, 2008, by the inventors named in the present application. This patent application claims the benefit of the filing date of the United States patent applications and the Provisional Patent Applications cited above according to the statutes and rules governing provisional patent applications, particularly 35 U.S.C. §119(a)(i) and 37 C.F.R. §1.78(a)(4) and (a)(5). The specification and drawings of the United States patent applications and the Provisional Patent Applications referenced above are specifically incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
219840 | Winchester | Sep 1879 | A |
419220 | Scanland | Jan 1890 | A |
681091 | Adamson | Aug 1901 | A |
1659649 | Ernst et al. | Feb 1928 | A |
1771897 | ONeil et al. | Jul 1930 | A |
1872107 | Bond | Aug 1932 | A |
1908314 | Brownsdon | May 1933 | A |
2476291 | Garber | Jul 1949 | A |
2665635 | Morel | Jan 1954 | A |
2788744 | Donner | Apr 1957 | A |
2953816 | Kidder | Sep 1960 | A |
2973711 | Clark, Jr. | Mar 1961 | A |
2986998 | Clark, Jr. | Jun 1961 | A |
3022731 | Yeomans, Jr. | Feb 1962 | A |
3022734 | Kidder | Feb 1962 | A |
3053185 | Oberfell et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3058420 | Tanner et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3095817 | Clark, Jr. | Jul 1963 | A |
3120807 | Lyon | Feb 1964 | A |
3138102 | Meyer et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3180265 | Rybak | Apr 1965 | A |
3191534 | Vecchiotti | Jun 1965 | A |
3211100 | Clark, Jr. | Oct 1965 | A |
3215076 | Foote et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3217648 | Foote et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3221658 | Devaux | Dec 1965 | A |
3234877 | Herter | Feb 1966 | A |
3262392 | Becker et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3266421 | Comerford | Aug 1966 | A |
3279375 | Herter | Oct 1966 | A |
3280745 | Mattarelli | Oct 1966 | A |
3285174 | Moehlman et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3289586 | Horn et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3298313 | Comerford | Jan 1967 | A |
3299813 | Rickey | Jan 1967 | A |
3323456 | Rothman | Jun 1967 | A |
3402664 | Cramer | Sep 1968 | A |
3420178 | Rempel | Jan 1969 | A |
3422762 | Clark, Jr. | Jan 1969 | A |
3427920 | Clark, Jr. | Feb 1969 | A |
3469527 | Pace | Sep 1969 | A |
3503332 | De Gregorio | Mar 1970 | A |
3507220 | McClure | Apr 1970 | A |
3507221 | Grolly | Apr 1970 | A |
3565010 | Sahlmann et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3598054 | Webb et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3653326 | Howsam et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3662683 | Merritt | May 1972 | A |
3670650 | McCaffrey et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3707915 | Kerzman | Jan 1973 | A |
3720171 | Hubbard | Mar 1973 | A |
3721197 | Hughes et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3722420 | Herter | Mar 1973 | A |
3727557 | Starcevich | Apr 1973 | A |
3750579 | Bellington | Aug 1973 | A |
3750580 | Nomura et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3788224 | Merritt | Jan 1974 | A |
3804019 | Hurley | Apr 1974 | A |
3812784 | Herter | May 1974 | A |
3835783 | Curran | Sep 1974 | A |
3974775 | Kerzman et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3978794 | Fiocchi | Sep 1976 | A |
4004522 | Furniss et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4103621 | Fackler | Aug 1978 | A |
4151799 | Jackson | May 1979 | A |
4164903 | Bouza | Aug 1979 | A |
4220090 | Fackler | Sep 1980 | A |
4291625 | Stagg, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4295426 | Genco et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4307664 | Vollers | Dec 1981 | A |
4452144 | Maki | Jun 1984 | A |
4553481 | Ricci | Nov 1985 | A |
4574701 | Fiocchi | Mar 1986 | A |
4587905 | Maki | May 1986 | A |
4627356 | Buczkowski | Dec 1986 | A |
4669385 | Maki | Jun 1987 | A |
4676170 | Roster | Jun 1987 | A |
4733613 | Bilsbury et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4773329 | Bilsbury | Sep 1988 | A |
4776279 | Pejsa | Oct 1988 | A |
4782759 | Hawk | Nov 1988 | A |
4815388 | Schluckebier et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4860661 | Bock et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4970959 | Bilsbury et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
D314806 | Cole | Feb 1991 | S |
5105713 | Wirgau | Apr 1992 | A |
5171934 | Moore | Dec 1992 | A |
5214238 | Young | May 1993 | A |
5235915 | Stevens | Aug 1993 | A |
5239928 | Ricci | Aug 1993 | A |
5339743 | Scarlata | Aug 1994 | A |
5347932 | Gardner et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5471931 | Gardner | Dec 1995 | A |
5623118 | Jackson | Apr 1997 | A |
5792979 | Pietro | Aug 1998 | A |
5837927 | Buenemann, Jr. | Nov 1998 | A |
5861572 | Schuermann | Jan 1999 | A |
5970878 | Gardner | Oct 1999 | A |
5979330 | Cornell | Nov 1999 | A |
6067909 | Knoster, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6161482 | Clark | Dec 2000 | A |
6164209 | Best et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6260484 | Billings | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6367388 | Billings | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7481167 | Engel et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
8220393 | Schluckebier | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8424456 | Broden | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8485102 | Carlson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8800449 | Schluckebier | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20040069177 | Klein | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050039627 | Zanoletti | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050188882 | Diller | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070012212 | Shaeffer | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070119329 | Haeselich | May 2007 | A1 |
20100101444 | Schluckebier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20140076187 | Schluckebier | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1808779 | Jun 1970 | DE |
1 255 993 | Mar 1961 | FR |
78 417 | Jul 1962 | FR |
1 534 004 | Jul 1968 | FR |
2 343 218 | Sep 1977 | FR |
2 568 001 | Jan 1986 | FR |
2 687 217 | Aug 1993 | FR |
427344 | Nov 1947 | IT |
WO 9510752 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 2010062584 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2014011628 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Oct. 9, 2013 for PCT/US2013/049715, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Oct. 9, 2013 for PCT/US2013/049715, 4 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Feb. 3, 2010 for PCT/US2009/062180, filed Oct. 27, 2009. |
International Search Report mailed Mar. 5, 2010 for PCT/US2010/022523, filed Jan. 29, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 18, 2011 for PCT/US2009/062180, filed Oct. 27, 2009. |
English translation of foreign patent #FR 1 255 993 A. |
English translation of foreign patent #FR 78 417 E. |
Written Opinion mailed Feb. 3, 2010 for PCT/US2009/062180, filed Oct. 27, 2009. |
Written Opinion mailed Mar. 5, 2010 for PCT/US2010/022523, filed Jan. 29, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140345488 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61108678 | Oct 2008 | US | |
61113286 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13548464 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14455673 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12606447 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13548464 | US |