The embodiments of the present invention relate to casino wagering games.
This invention is in the general field of casino gaming and, more particularly, is an adjunct to the game of twenty one.
Twenty one, also known as blackjack, is a game played at a semicircular table with seven player stations equally spaced on the table's top near an arcuate edge thereof. A player station has an imprint of a circle. A player at the station places cheques, chips, tokens or cash representative of a wager within the circle. A dealer is positioned near a straight edge of the table. The dealer faces the player.
Twenty one is played with one or more standard decks of cards. An ace dealt to a player has a point value of either “1” or “11” at the election of the player; a face card (jack, queen or king) has a point value of “10” and each of the remaining cards (“2” through “10”) have a point value equal to what is alternatively referred to as a “pip” value or a number value. Point values of cards held by the player are added together to obtain a total point value. A total point value of cards held by the dealer is obtained in a similar manner.
After the cheques are placed within the circle, the cards are shuffled and the player and the dealer are each dealt a hand comprised of two cards. The two cards of the player's hand are dealt face-up. A first card of the dealer's hand is dealt face-down. A second card of the dealer's hand is dealt face-up. The players and dealer are dealt cards, one at a time, in a clockwise fashion beginning with a player to the dealer's most left position.
Whenever the dealer's face-up card is either an ace or has a point value of “10”, the dealer ascertains the point value of the face-down card without revealing it to the player. When the dealer's two dealt cards have a total point value of “21,” the dealer is said to have blackjack whereupon the dealer turns the face-down card face up. Similarly, when a player's two dealt cards have the total point value of “21,” the player is said to have blackjack.
When the dealer has blackjack, the dealer wins the wager with two exceptions. A first exception occurs when the dealer's face up card is an ace and the player makes what is known as an insurance bet which is typically equal to one half, or less, of the wager. When the dealer does not have blackjack, the player loses the insurance bet. Conversely, when the dealer has blackjack, the player wins the insurance bet. When the player wins, cheques representative of the wager and two and one half times the insurance bet are returned to the player.
The second exception occurs when the player has blackjack whereupon the cheques representative of the wager are returned to the player. The second exception is an example of when the player's hand and the dealer's hand have the same total point value and is referred to as a push.
When the player has blackjack and the dealer does not, the player wins the wager and is typically paid 3 to 2 on his or her wager. When neither the dealer nor the player have blackjack, the player has four options.
A first option is to have the player's hand augmented by what is called a draw card (referred to as a “hit”). The player may have successive hits until the player total point value exceeds “21.” When the total point value of a hand exceeds “21” it is said to bust. The player loses the wager when the player's hand busts. Therefore, busting is a sudden, catastrophic termination of play for the player.
A second option is not to have the player's hand augmented by the draw card (referred to as a “stand”). The player may stand at any time that the player's hand has not busted.
A third option, referred to as doubling down, permits the player to double the wager and receive one additional card.
A fourth option is available when the player's hand is comprised of two cards that are a pair, such as a pair of queens, for example. The player may split the pair into first and second hands. An additional card is dealt to the player's first hand and to the player's second hand. The player's first and second hands are then each played as described hereinbefore.
The decision to hit or stand is made with an objective of causing the total point value of the payer's hand to be closer to “21” than the total point value of the dealer's hand. It should be understood that central factors in making the decision are the dealer's face-up card and the total point value of the player's hand.
After the player stands, the dealer's face-down card is turned face-up, whereby both cards of the dealer's hand are face-up. When the total point value of the dealer's hand is less than “17,” the dealer must hit until the total point value of the dealer's hand is at least “17.” When a hit causes the dealer's hand to bust and the player's hand has not busted, the player wins the wager.
It should be understood that when an exemplary hand includes an ace and a six, for example, it is referred to as a soft “17” because the ace causes the exemplary hand to have alternative point values of “7” and “17.” Usually, the dealer's hand cannot be hit when it is the soft “17.”
When neither the player's hand nor the dealer's hand busts and the total point value of the dealer's hand exceeds the total point value of the player's hand, the dealer wins and vice versa. When there is a push, there is no winner; the cheques representative of the wager are returned to the player.
According to the present invention, in a game of twenty one, a player has an option of making 2nd chance wagers before cards are dealt. The 2nd chance wagers can take various forms, but ideally they are based on the dealer's cards or the player's cards. In one embodiment, the player wins a 2nd chance wager when a first two cards dealt to the player have a total point value of “21.” Similarly, the player may place a 2nd chance wager based on a first two cards dealt to a dealer having a total point value of “21.” In response to winning a 2nd chance wager, a number is randomly selected from a number pool. In one embodiment, the player receives a payout equal to an amount of the winning 2nd chance wager multiplied by the selected number. Alternatively, the numbers may correspond to cash amounts.
The random selection of the numbers from a numbers pool is facilitated by an apparatus including a ball container, ball agitator and means for isolating one or more of the balls. The apparatus can be attached to a gaming table or adjacent thereto.
While any casino table game may benefit from the embodiments of the present invention, blackjack is used to describe the embodiments in detail.
As shown in
The table top 10 incorporates distinct player stations 15-1 through 15-7. Each distinct player station 15-1 through 15-7 includes wagering areas 18, 20 and 22. Wagering areas 18-1 through 18-7 are used for a conventional blackjack wager and wagering areas 20-1 through 20-7 are denoted as PLAYER 2nd chance wagering areas and wagering areas 22-1 through 22-7 are denoted as DEALER 2nd chance wagering areas.
A player places cheques, tokens, chips or cash (hereinafter “cheques”) representative of a wager for the game of blackjack within the circle 18. Before cards are dealt, the player has an option making 2nd chance wagers. In one embodiment, a first type of 2nd chance wager is that the player's first two dealt cards have a total point count of “21.” To make the wager, the player places cheques representative of the amount of the first type of 2nd chance wager within the circle 20. A second type of 2nd chance wager is that the dealer's first two dealt cards have a total point count of “21.” To make the wager, the player places cheques representative of the amount of the second type of 2nd chance wager within the circle 22. When the player wins a 2nd chance wager, an amount that is won is determined as described hereinafter. It should be noted that other pre-established hands may result in a winning 2nd chance wager. For example, the 2nd chance wager may be won when the player receives three 7s or the dealer receives three 7s or a player or dealer receives three 2s in their hand. Truly, any conceivable card combination is within the scope of the present invention.
As shown in
A multiplicity of balls 44, similar to bingo balls, are within the container 42. The balls 44 are marked with numerals. An air entry tube is connected to the bottom of the container 42. A mesh (not shown) within the container 42 prevents the balls 44 from falling into the tube 46. A discharge tube 48 connects the interior of the container 42 to its exterior through atop 50 of the container 42.
When play ends with the dealer's total point count being “21,” the dealer depresses the pushbutton 17. In response to the pushbutton 17 being depressed, air from a compressed air tank (not shown) flows into the tube 46 thereby agitating the balls 44. Additionally, the air forces one of the balls 44 through the tube 48 causing it to be captured therein and displayed to the players. The players who have won 2nd chance wagers win the amount of their 2nd chance wager multiplied by the number depicted on the ball that is captured. Alternatively, the numerals may correspond to cash equivalents and multiple captured balls may be used to determine an award.
In an alternative embodiment, the pushbutton 17 is mobile. When, for example, players win the 2nd chance wager, a first of the winning players is given the pushbutton. The first winning player depresses the pushbutton 17 to cause a first of the balls 44 to be captured. The amount of the first winning player's wager is multiplied by the number of the first ball to determine the amount that is won by the first winning player. In a similar manner, amounts won by each of the other winning players is determined. It is also, conceivable that when multiple players win the 2nd chance wager on the same hand, they each receive the same award determined by a single activation of the ball dispenser.
It is also envisioned that the embodiments of the present invention may be facilitated in an electronic gaming machine. For example, the game of blackjack can be played between a single player and a simulated dealer. A simulated ball dispenser will be used to determine the amount of the 2nd chance wager.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/141,907 filed May 8, 2002, now abandoned entitled “2ND CHANCE TWENTY ONE.”
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4364567 | Goott | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4861041 | Jones et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 5118114 | Tucci | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5121920 | Laezzo et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5288077 | Jones | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5364105 | Jones | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5377973 | Jones et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5452900 | Skratulia et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5544892 | Breeding | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549300 | Sardarian | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5639089 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5660393 | Dreger | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5690337 | Somma et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5791989 | Slinkman | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5823534 | Banyai | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5845903 | Sloan | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5364105 | Jones | May 1999 | A |
| 5954335 | Moody | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6019374 | Breeding | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6158741 | Koelling | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6270407 | Dodge | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273424 | Breeding | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6276689 | Brown | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6315290 | Roethel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6334614 | Breeding | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6368212 | Moody | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6416406 | Duhamel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6471208 | Yoseloff et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6527270 | Maksymec et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6568677 | Brenner | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6582307 | Webb | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6659461 | Yoseloff et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676128 | Wolf | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6743094 | Johnson | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 20010000933 | Koelling | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20020039923 | Cannon et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101035 | Wolf | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020153656 | Maksymec et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195773 | Dunn | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030073476 | Friedman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073485 | Friedman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075863 | Friedman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114219 | McClintic | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030127793 | Adams | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189291 | Zimmer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216170 | Walker et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040053673 | Mishra | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053683 | Hartl et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10141907 | May 2002 | US |
| Child | 10625815 | US |