1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of blow molded plastic containers, and more particularly to a lightweight rectangular plastic container.
2. Description of the Related Technology
Many products that were previously packaged using glass containers are now being supplied in plastic containers, such as containers that are fabricated from polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
PET containers are typically manufactured using the stretch blow molding process. This involves the use of a preform that is injection molded into a shape that facilitates distribution of the plastic material within the preform into the desired final shape of the container. The preform is first heated and then is longitudinally stretched and subsequently inflated within a mold cavity so that it assumes the desired final shape of the container. As the preform is inflated, it takes on the shape of the mold cavity. The polymer solidifies upon contacting the cooler surface of the mold, and the finished hollow container is subsequently ejected from the mold.
Plastic containers must be designed to withstand different types of forces without excessive deformation. Adequate column or top load strength is required to prevent buckling or bulging of the container sidewall when the container is subjected to longitudinal compression, for example as a result of stacking of the containers during transportation. In addition, plastic containers must possess adequate circumferential or hoop strength to control deformation as a result of internal and external pressure differences.
In order to minimize material costs, it is desirable to make the sidewall of such containers as thin as possible. Such lightweighting, however, comes at the expense of container strength. Structural features such as grooves and ribs are often used to optimize the strength to weight characteristics of particular containers. For example, containers that have a substantially rectangular transverse cross-section commonly incorporate a narrowed circumferential waist portion, which enhances the hoop strength of the container and limits outward bulging of the container sidewall as a result of internal pressurization.
Another factor that often comes into play in the design of blow molded plastic containers is the suitability for a particular container design for receiving a label, such as a shrink-wrap label. Such labels must bridge structural features such as recessed grooves or the recessed waist of a rectangular container, which can create an unsightly appearance and potentially expose the label to damage when it is contacted by a consumer's fingernails or other object.
A need exists for a rectangular plastic container that possesses superior strength to weight characteristics in order to limit bulging of the container sidewall, while also minimizing deep surface dislocations that could interfere with the function of a label.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a rectangular plastic container that possesses superior strength to weight characteristics in order to limit bulging of the container sidewall, while also minimizing deep surface dislocations that could interfere with the function of a label.
In order to achieve the above and other objects of the invention, a blow molded plastic container according to one aspect of the invention includes a main body portion that has a substantially rectangular shape when viewed in transverse cross-section. A plurality of side panels are defined on the main body portion. At least one of the side panels as a longitudinally oriented concave scoop that extends continuously from an upper portion of the side panel to a lower portion of the side panel. Side panel further includes a first pair of longitudinally oriented concave ribs positioned adjacent to an upper portion of the scoop and a second pair of longitudinally oriented concave ribs that are positioned adjacent to a lower portion of the scoop.
These and various other advantages and features of novelty that characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there is illustrated and described a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding structure throughout the views, and referring in particular to
The plastic container 10 is preferably fabricated from a material such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) using the reheat stretch blow molding process.
Main body portion 12 has a substantially rectangular shape when viewed in transverse cross-section, as is shown in
Each of the side panels 22 preferably includes a longitudinally oriented concave scoop 26 that extends continuously from an upper portion 36 of the side panel 22 to a lower portion 38 of the side panel 22. The side panel 22 also preferably includes a first pair of longitudinally oriented concave ribs 28, 30 that are positioned adjacent to an upper portion 40 of the scoop 26, and a second pair of longitudinally oriented concave ribs 32, 34 that are positioned adjacent to a lower portion 42 of the scoop 26.
Each of the side panels 22 is furthermore substantially rectangular as viewed in side elevation.
In the preferred embodiment, each of the longitudinally oriented concave ribs 28, 30, 32, 34 has substantially the same maximum depth RD, as is shown diagrammatically in
The main body portion 12 is advantageously constructed so as to have no narrowed waist portion that would need to be bridged by a label.
The first pair of ribs 28, 30 is preferably substantially symmetrical in size and in shape. Similarly, the second pair of ribs 32, 34 is preferably substantially symmetrical in size and in shape. The two pairs of ribs are also preferably aligned with respect to each other so that the rib 28 is in substantial alignment with the rib 32, and the rib 30 is in substantial alignment with the rib 34.
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment, the upper average radius RU is substantially the same as the lower average radius RL.
At least one of the ribs 28, 30, 32, 34 has a first maximum depth RD, and the scoop 26 has a second maximum depth SD. Preferably, a ratio of the first maximum depth RD to the second maximum depth SD is substantially within a range of about 1.0 to about 3.0, more preferably substantially within a range of that 1.5 to about 2.5 and most preferably substantially within a range of about 1.75 to about 2.25.
Ribs 28, 30, 32, 34 further have opposing sidewalls that define an angle α, which in the preferred embodiment is substantially within a range of about 30 degrees to about 60 degrees.
One of the first pair of ribs 28, 30 has a first height HU and, as is discussed above, is substantially aligned with one of the second pair of ribs 32, 34, which has a second height HL. The sum of the first and second heights HU, HL defines a total rib height. Preferably, a ratio of the total rib height to a height HP of the panel is substantially within a range of about 0.5 to about 0.95. More preferably, this ratio is substantially within a range of about 0.6 to about 0.9, and most preferably it is substantially within a range of about 0.7 to about 0.85.
The scoop 26 has a maximum height HS, and a ratio of the maximum height HS of the scoop to the maximum height HP of the side panel 22 is preferably substantially within a range of about 0.6 to about 0.85 and more preferably substantially within a range of about 0.7 to about 0.8.
The scoop 26 as viewed in transverse cross-section has an average radius RS, and each of the grooves 28, 30, 32, 34 has an average radius RG. A ratio of the average radius RS of the scoop 26 to the average radius RG of the grooves is preferably substantially within a range of about 0.04 to about 0.1.
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4108324 | Krishnakumar et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
5908128 | Krishnakumar et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5989661 | Krishnakumar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6413466 | Boyd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439413 | Prevot et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6763968 | Boyd et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6920992 | Lane et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7080747 | Lane et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20030196926 | Tobias et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040211746 | Trude | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070045222 | Denner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080000867 | Lane et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080314862 | Matsuoka et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100155360 | Mast et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120248003 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |