This invention relates to a walker safety device and, more particularly, to a device which trains the user to stay within the confines of the walker structure so as to preclude undesirable movement relative to the walker and possible resulting injuries.
Many individuals utilize walkers to assist them with ambulatory movement. However, certain issues arise from improper walker use. One problem is the improper displacement of the user from the walker structure. If the user is outside the walker confines, i.e. too far from the walker front, the walker may slip away from the user causing user slippage and/or falls and subsequent injury. Walker issues may also arise if the user is too close to the walker front.
It is therefor desirable to have a device on the walker which alerts the user when at an undesirable distance relative to the walker, particularly at a distance beyond the confines of walker structure.
Although the use of a proximity sensor has been suggested, such suggested use was in connection with the user walking away from the walker so as to remind the user that he/she has forgotten the walker. The sensor was not used in connection with a training program so as to provide feedback to the user of proper walker use during ambulatory movement.
In response thereto I have invented a safety device which warns the user when displaced too far or too close relative to the walker structure. The device includes a housing having a proximity sensor, processor with accompanying processing software, input devices and alarms therein. The desired distances, relative to the walker, may be preset and subsequently monitored. Various visual, audial and tactile warnings alert the user as to when the set distances are not maintained. These feedbacks urge the user to maintain a desired position relative to the walker. The frequency of such undesirable user displacements, relative to the walker, can also be monitored so as to regulate the degree of feedback given to the walker user. Thus, the device is an effective tool which properly trains the user as to proper walker use.
It is therefore a general object of this invention to provide a safety device for use with a walker which provides various forms of feedback so as to advise the user of the maintenance of desired distances relative to the walker.
Another object of this invention is to provide a device, as aforesaid, which enables the user to set desired distance parameters relative to the walker.
A further object of this invention is to provide a device, as aforesaid, which trains the user to walk within the confines of the walker structure.
A still further object of this invention is to provide a device, as aforesaid, which regulates the type and degree of feedback given to the user when within or without a selected distance relative to the walker.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein is set forth by way of illustration and example, embodiments of this invention.
Turning more particularly to the drawings,
Housing 500, which contains the
1. Distance measuring range: 20 to 150 cm
2. Analog output
3. Size: 29.5×13×21.66 mm
4. Consumption current: Typ. 33 mA
5. Supply voltage: 4.5 to 5.5 V
Other characteristics as shown below:
As shown above, the housing contains the proximity sensor 100, which has a measuring distance capable of 20 to 150 cms. This distance range will include the desired displacements of the user from the front cross bar 1100 of the walker, i.e., a too “close” or a too “far” distance. As shown in the electrical diagram these too “close” or too “far” distances can be preset by dials 306, 308 which control potentiometers (
As shown in
Optionally, the software also detects whether the signal indicates the user is too close (216) to the walker. As such, the program logic will send a signal to the amplifier circuit (
A counter 520 may also be utilized in the processing logic to count the extent of the user's undesirable displacements relative to the walker whether too far, too close or both. Once the alarm counter 520 reaches a preselected threshold of undesirable displacements, LED 420 is energized so as to glow both colors. Accordingly, the frequency of warnings of undesirable displacements provided to the user may be regulated during ambulatory movement rather than warnings being given each time the user moves to an undesirable displacement.
As such the CPU processing software provides the user with various visual, audio and tactile alarms indicative of the user drifting too close or away or both from the walker. Thus, the user can take corrective action. Once the number of such undesirable displacements is reached without correction, the user is provided with a plurality of alarms. These multiple alarms advise the user as well as other personnel of a user's problem with the walker.
Also, haptic/tactile feedback may also be provided to the user if too “close” or “far” displacements are detected (see
It is also understood that the above disclosure enables one to modify the processing logic so as to provide various levels of feedback to the user, e.g., visual only, audio only, tactile only or various combinations thereof with or without the counter function.
It is understood that the above logic software is effective in training the new user. Thus, the safety device can be used in both training and continuing use environments.
It is to be understood that while certain forms of this invention have been illustrated and described, it is not limited thereto, except in so far as such limitations are included in the following claims and allowable equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 62/193,172, filed Jul. 16, 2015, entitled “WALKER SAFETY DEVICE”.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5311880 | Lancaster et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5511571 | Adrezin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5794639 | Einbinder | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5853219 | Santuccio | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5865450 | Ulrich | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6011481 | Luther et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6930603 | Jackson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7385514 | Dempsey | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7826983 | Alwan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7963294 | Trout | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 8453662 | Trout | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8460219 | Miyake | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8702567 | Hu | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8810407 | Nolan | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8974232 | Behrenbruch | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 20050077345 | March | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20060149338 | Flaherty | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174685 | Skvortsov | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292533 | Selod | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070085993 | Brown | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20120085377 | Trout | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20140190536 | Friedman | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Article: Rachel O'Connell, “Alert System and Cadence Walker,” Spring 2013, University of Wisconsin. |
| Spec. Sheet: Precision Microdrives 310-101, 10mm shaftless vibration motor, 3.4mm button type (copyright 2008). |
| Brochure: Sharp GP2Y0A02YKOF, sheet No. E4-A00101EN. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62193172 | Jul 2015 | US |