THIS INVENTION relates to wall cladding and in particular to various methods concerning wall cladding and an associated cladding panel and in particular but not limited to a folded edge cladding panel with improved edge integrity. More particularly, the invention concerns a cladding panel with unexpected characteristics in use.
Metal wall cladding has been around for many years, as early as corrugated iron sheeting. More specialised cladding has developed over the years, primarily as a facade over masonry including concrete.
Aluminium composite panels have been used in wall cladding for over 30 years. Some of these panels have proved combustible. In recent times these have been exposed to catastrophic failure during fire events. The most notable is the Grenfell Tower fire in London. If the cladding is combustible fire can spread rapidly on the exterior of the building.
Composite panels have a wide variety of applications, such as architecture. In architecture, for instance, composite panels are used for external walls, shop awnings, signage and ceilings. Depending on their composition, composite panels can exhibit many advantageous features such as being weatherproof, noise-absorbing, fireproof, light and easy to cut, impact-resistant and easy to maintain. Composite panels are also known as sandwich elements, as they commonly consist of a plurality of different layers arranged on top of each other. In many cases, composite panels exhibit at least three layers, in particular a core layer as well as two outer layers attached to either side of the core.
Rather than being directed to general uses, as are typical in the example in the previous paragraph, the present invention has its primary application to exterior cladding.
It is an object of the present invention for provision, primarily to and for exterior cladding, to a method of exterior cladding, and to a cladding panel and associated parts and fittings.
A further object is to provide a relatively light cladding but substantially eliminate any fire risk including minimising any drop risk during a fire event and quite unexpectedly, a panel with virtually no fire risk to the underlying structure should the cladding be subjected to a fire event.
Furthermore, a still further object is to provide a mechanical panel fabrication and assembly process, from raw blank laminated material, so that the resulting panel assembly has reduced cracking of the external finish and reduced likelihood of a delamination.
Frequently, composite panels have tried to incorporate a fire-retardant layer into the panel based on the inclusion of a wet mix of fillers along with Magnesium Oxide or Magnesium Hydroxide in one form or another during manufacture to produce a core panel and then apply outer layers to the core panel. The outer layers may be aluminium or steel and aluminium (See for example US2013216796; US2017328063).
Generally speaking exterior cladding may be described as a crowded or mature art. U.S. Pat. No. 7,866,107; AU678668; U.S. Ser. No. 10/190,320; U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,926,707; 7,621,084; EP1306495; WO2019/096882; WO2014/108927; EP3511481; represent a non-exhaustive exemplification of cladding. In addition there are many arrangements for anchoring exterior cladding panels to buildings, for example US2012/198788; WO92/3153; U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,209; GB2470373; CH663813; GB2227262; GB1427234; DE19653672; DE19621624.
The Applicant's invention should be viewed through the lens of a crowded art in order to demonstrate that in all the circumstances the notional skilled person would be presented with many similar solutions to the present invention. Since the present invention arises in a crowded art it would be prima facie wrong to suggest that there was, or is, apart from the very general problem of fire, a particular problem or motivation extant at the filing date of the present application that would give rise to the non-inventive notional person coming up with the present invention either in idea, concept or practical form. Thus the recognition and the present conception may be considered as whole or part of the Applicant's inventive step.
With this and the other background factors, including as set out above, in mind, it should be clearly appreciated to the reader, that it is elementary that exercise of the inventive faculty in all the circumstances, in such a crowded art, is likely to be present in small variations. This is a background observation in hindsight only and is not to say that any of Applicant's new features whether individually or in combination are in any way slight or small. All that is required is a “scintilla” of invention.
Even though the art has become crowded, according to Applicant's understanding of the marketplace, there have been many offerings in the field of cladding, the use of cladding as a facade has been widely accepted. Consequently, there is a requirement for a fresh look “outside the box” through new eyes in an effort to provide an alternative to the efforts made over the last many years. It would be desirable to have something that is simple and easy to assemble, yet effective, but employing common techniques and methods to arrive at a new and useful combination and result. Simplicity is not considered a bar to invention but in a crowded art may indeed be an indicator of invention.
It will be appreciated from the following description that simplicity in a crowded art is a characteristic of the Applicant's invention.
This means that the present invention does not arise through any deterministic relationship to the prior art but rather is the inventor's own inspiration in an individualistic way applying the inventor's mind to the general state of the art and to the inventor's knowledge and recognition of defects arising during his prototyping and development that might be remedied, this being as an alternative to what is currently available, rather than an effort to deal with any specific generally recognised real extant problem common at the time or any notional problem derived ex post facto from any single item of the prior art, selected by hindsight, from a clearly crowded art, since any selection in a crowded art must necessarily be based on the Applicant's disclosure as the starting point. Selection of features from what are otherwise workable solutions must necessarily involve a rejection of other features from the combinations disclosed in those solutions. In the absence of a novelty destroying publication, it will be clear that over the many years the present invention escaped the skilled person.
In one broad aspect there is provided a fire resistant lightweight cladding comprising thin sheet material having an outer layer which is predominantly steel and a thicker inner layer which is predominantly aluminium, the inner layer being a supporting layer and the sheet material being formed into a panel of predetermined outline, panel attachment means being provided for the purpose of anchoring the panel to a substrate. In another aspect there is provided a fire resistant wall panel assembly comprising a substrate supporting outer panels in side by side relation, each panel having a cladding sheet being a composite of a relatively thin steel layer and a relatively thick aluminium layer, the steel layer being outside the aluminium layer, the relative dimensions of the layers and the overall sheet thickness being so made and arranged that under a fire test of a specimen of said panels in a wall panel assembly according to British Standard BS 8414-2 2015 (amdt 1) as modified by Australian 5113-2016 (amdt 1) the specimen passes the classification criteria 5.4.5(b) for temperature reached behind the cladding. Preferably, the steel layer is about 0.4 mm thick and the aluminium layer is about 2 mm thick. Preferably, the cladding sheet density ranges from 6 kg/m2 to 9 kg/m2. Typically each panel includes a molten metal collector behind the sheet. More preferably, each cladding sheet has a folded edge formation with a terminal edge of the sheet concealed inside the folded edge formation. While it is preferred that there only be two layers, the invention concerns at least those two layers so the addition of other non-combustible layers will not affect the working of the inventions although these may add to the weight and cost of the panels.
In another aspect there is provided a cladding panel having a relatively thick inner layer of aluminium or equivalent and a relatively thin outer layer of steel or equivalent, the relative dimensions of the layers and the overall panel thickness being so made and arranged that under a fire test of a specimen of said panels according to British Standard BS 8414-2 2015 (amdt 1) as modified by Australian 5113-2016 (amdt 1) the specimen passes the classification criteria 5.4.5(g). Under the test condition set out in Appendix 1 hereto, the preferred panel provides, quite unexpectedly, under classification criteria 5.4.5(g), a result of less than 0.1 kg of debris falling from the test specimen.
In a still further aspect there is provided a cladding panel having a relatively thin outer steel layer and an aluminium layer, the panel being made from a flat sheet having a terminal edge exposing the aluminium, the completed panel having a folded edge formation with the terminal edge concealed inside the folded edge formation. The edge formation is typically a rolled over marginal edge section of the flat sheet. The rolled over marginal edge section typically comprises an upright flange of double thickness using an inward return flange. Edge formation is typically formed around the completed panel so that the panel forms an open box-like structure. Panels may be fitted to an underlying wall using a grid of rails or they may be fitted directly. The panel fittings may employ spaced brackets. The brackets may be fastenerless to the panels. The relationship between the panels and brackets may be such that the panels are effectively clamped by the brackets.
In a further preferred aspect there is provided a panel and fitting assembly, in a first form, the panel has a flange, typically a rolled over double thickness flange with a concealed edge, the flange having spaced bracket attachments, typically slots, and there being securing brackets inserted into the slots. The slots are optional and the panels may be fitted with brackets fastened directly or indirectly to the panel. The brackets may fit inside the panel. Ordinarily, there will be a gap between panels filled with a suitable filler.
The edge formation is typically a surrounding flange employing folds so that the original edge of the starting panel is concealed inside the flange. The flange typically has spaced slots, the slots being preformed slot sections formed before folding so that upon folding they overlay to form the slot.
Each panel preferably uses a panel connecting bracket and each bracket typically includes a slot fitting section and an offset wall connector section so that the panel may be secured to an underlying structure using fasteners passing through the bracket. The bracket is typically S-shaped in profile.
Preferably, in a preferred form according to the invention, the sheet material used is about 2.5 mm thick and is about 6 kg/m2 to about 9 kg/m2 density when formed into panels. These panels may be box-like. Where the panel is box-like, an insulation material may optionally be fitted into the box form. In another form, insulation may be fitted as a sheet under the cladding. Depending on the building height the insulation may typically vary from 25 mm thick (low rise) to 50 mm thick (high rise). Preferably, a lightweight insulating material may be employed. The lightweight insulation material may be solid polystyrene coated with carbon (EPC). In this form, the panels may be directly fitted to the building. Alternatively, a frame structure may be used but at added time and costs. The insulation may be applied first as a full sheet and then the panels fitted using brackets. The panel may be formed having spaced openings or cutouts of the like used to anchor the panel to a substrate.
In a preferred form a partially completed panel, has a partially formed edge formation along edges prior to folding from a sheet of composite material, the sheet having a thin front layer or outer layer of mild steel with a second thicker layer of aluminium, the flat sheet having corner cutouts, spaced side cutouts and slots matched to the side cutouts. Fold grooves are cut in the aluminium outboard and inboard of the slots to a depth just above the steel layer. The edges are then folded in turn about the respective fold grooves to give a panel with a double fold upright side of an open box form with a return flange inside the box and the steel layer on the outside of the box. Thus the terminal edge of the sheet is folded into a concealed position. The slots may be used to secure the panel to a wall using brackets fitted into the slots. The brackets are typically panel clamps slightly narrower than the distance from the clamp slot to the back edge of the panel so that the panel clamp performs its clamping function using suitable fasteners to an underlying structure while being a fastenerless connection to the panel.
The bracket slots are preferably greater than double the bracket length so that panels may fit side-by-side with respective brackets being offset relative to the adjacent bracket so the brackets of adjacent panels fit side-by-side. Other forms of cutouts or the like may be made in the panel and used to anchor the panel either directly or indirectly to a substrate.
In one form a stiffener may be used across panels to both stiffen and also capture molten material in a fire event. The stiffener has an upper opening so in a high-temperature fire event the stiffener will serve to capture melted aluminium to thereby reduce the drop of molten material from the wall.
In order that the present improvements may be more readily understood and put into practical effect reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings which illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention and wherein:
Referring to the drawings and initially to
The panel, in this example, is made from a square or rectangular blank of composite material being a thin front layer or outer layer of mild steel with a second thicker layer of aluminium. The sheet overall thickness is 2.5 mm. The front layer is sold under the Bluescope Steel trade name Zincanneal and is mild steel with a protective zinc coating. The composite is formed using 0.4 mm Zincanneal and 2 mm Aluminium with a 0.1 mm bonding membrane between the two fora total thickness of 2.5 mm. The Aluminium side is shown upward in
Edge 11 shows the result of earlier cutting, namely, three cutouts 13, 14 and 15 aligned with cutout slots 16, 17 and 18. These cutouts fold over the slots in the finished panel. Each corner is cut as at 19. A fold groove 20 is also milled out along this edge between the slots and cutouts. In this case it is about 2 mm wide and just to a depth above the steel layer. The next step is shown along the edge 12. A second fold groove 21 is cut inboard of the slots as shown along edge 12. The arrangement of edge 12 is reproduced along each edge. The edges are then folded.
Using the groove 20 there is made an upward fold (arrow 22) so that the flange sections between the cutouts are folded over 180° with the flange sections 23, 24 and so on along the edge 12 so that the cutouts align with the slots and then this means that the terminal edge 25 is folded into a concealed position according to the further 90° fold about fold groove 21 indicated by the arrow 27 to form the folded position illustrated in
All the bracket slots, for example, 18, in
The stiffener 33 has it's opening 34 uppermost when the panel is in its operative position. The stiffener 33 is hard against the aluminium so in a high-temperature fire event the stiffener will serve to capture melted aluminium to thereby reduce the drop of molten material from the wall.
In
In
The panels described herein were tested according to British Standard BS 8414-2 2015 (amdt 1) as modified by Australian 5113-2016 (amdt 1) and the specimen passes the classification criteria 5.4.4(b) which concerns the temperature differential from the outer fireside and inside and 5.4.5(g) which concerns debris. Under the test conditions set out in
The panels were tested according to British Standard BS 8414-2 2015 (amdt 1) as modified by Australian 5113-2016 (amdt 1) and the specimen passes the classification criteria 5.4.4(b) which concerns the temperature differential from the outer fireside and inside and 5.4.5(g) which concerns debris.
Whilst the above has been given by way of illustrative example many variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the broad ambit and scope of the invention as set out in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2020900364 | Feb 2020 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU21/00014 | 2/11/2021 | WO |