The present invention generally relates to wall panels and, more particularly to prefabricated wall panels for uses such as acoustic barriers along highways, retaining walls and the like.
Population growth of cities and towns in recent years has caused residential and commercial development of large areas of land around such cities and towns. Increased densities and speeds of traffic have thus been necessitated for travel to and within such areas, requiring many new roadways or roadway improvements (e.g. additional roadway lanes) while increased population density and land values have required utilization of land which often abuts major traffic thoroughfares where relatively high levels of noise are present. Such noise will often be communicated to nearby properties where the noise may interfere with desired uses of such property.
In recent years, walls have been constructed to function as acoustic baffles or barriers in an effort to reduce noise levels at locations adjacent to roadways where commercial, high density and/or high speed traffic is present. Such walls must be sturdily built of materials which are not easily damaged by weather conditions such as high winds or by possible impact from vehicles. The walls must also be relatively tall (e.g. eight feet to thirty feet or more) and must be securely anchored, requiring support posts to be of extreme length, generally twenty-five feet greater than the wall height or fastened to reinforced concrete caissons extending to a twenty-five foot or greater depth in the ground. Such a fastening has generally been accomplished by having large bolts embedded in or attached to the caisson using a flange and a complementary flange affixed to the post which can thus be affixed to the caisson below grade level and the connection then encapsulated with concrete to fill the remainder of the post hole above the caisson. Both the provision of a flange of sufficient robustness and the attachment of the post to the caisson contribute substantially to the overall cost of the wall system. Moreover, such structures and operations also required the posts to be installed several days prior to the installation of the wall sections (usually provided as panels of a standard height which are then essentially stacked edge-to-edge in grooves in the posts) in order for the concrete fill to cure adequately to carry loads imposed by the wall segments and their installation. Thus the installation of posts and installation of wall panel segments in separate operations increases the duration of construction time, the amount, types and movement of machinery required and the amount of labor involved, further contributing to cost of such walls. Further, such large structures may be required for both sides of substantial lengths of roadway and can thus add significantly to costs of roadway construction or improvement.
These factors favor construction of such barriers from large standardized wall panels of pre-cast concrete which are supported in grooves of some construction such as wide flanged or H-shaped steel beams which are anchored securely in the ground. However, for aesthetic as well as maintenance cost reasons, cast concrete posts having opposing grooves to receive the wall segments have been favored in recent years even though difficulties are presented in providing such opposed grooves of sufficient strength and accuracy.
In any case, somewhat different machinery has been required to anchor the posts in the ground with highly accurate spacing to receive ends of wall panels and to assemble the wall panels to them in separate operations. Further, if damage or settling occurs, the posts could shift and possibly allow the wall panels to become detached therefrom, particularly where wall panels of standardized size are stacked edge-to-edge, as alluded to above. Moreover, when a wall is built on terrain which is other than flat, such as where a grade is present, the bottom-most wall panels will generally reach the ground at only one corner, causing unbalanced and uncontrolled stresses in the wall which are transferred to the posts; aggravating any shifting which may occur and possibly causing wall failure.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a wall section or module with integrated post and panel wherein the post portion is extended beyond the top of the wall panel portion by a distance sufficient to accommodate the terrain elevations on which a wall is built using the integrated post and panel sections in accordance with the invention and beyond the bottom of the wall panel portion by a length sufficient for support of the wall section even if shifting or settling occurs.
It is another object of the invention to provide a wall section which minimizes unbalanced stresses transferred to posts and/or adjacent wall sections.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an integrated post and panel structure which allows the construction of a wall in a single set of operations at the location of each respective post and panel structure location.
In order to accomplish these and other objects of the invention, a module for construction of a wall is provided comprising a panel portion integrally formed with a post portion including a groove for receiving a distal end of a panel portion of an adjacent module, a top post extension portion for accommodating the entirety of the distal portion of the panel portion of the adjacent module when the module and the adjacent module are installed at different heights, and a bottom post extension portion for being integrated with a pier or caisson.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a modular wall comprising a plurality of wall modules is provided, each wall module comprising a panel portion integrally formed with a post portion, said post portion including a groove for receiving a distal end of a panel portion of an adjacent module, a top post extension portion for accommodating said distal portion of said panel portion of said adjacent module when said adjacent module and said module are installed at different heights, and a bottom post extension portion, the modular wall further comprising a caisson or pier integrated with said bottom post extension portion of the wall module.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, a method of constructing a modular wall is provided including steps of forming a post hole to a desired depth, placing a reinforcement cage or pier within the post hole, pouring concrete in the post hole around said reinforcement cage or pier leaving a portion of said reinforcement cage exposed, positioning a wall module comprising a panel portion integrally formed with a post portion including a groove for receiving a distal end of a panel portion of an adjacent module, and a bottom post extension portion such that said bottom post extension portion is received within said exposed portion of said reinforcement cage and said distal end of said wall portion is received in said groove of an adjacent module, and pouring a material to encapsulate said reinforcing cage and said bottom post extension portion.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
The invention principally comprises a novel integrated wall and post section for a wall, sometimes referred to as a post and panel structure or module 10 including an extended post portion that may be embedded in and thus integrated with a pier or caisson and which, when assembled with other similar sections or modules, forms a wall of enhanced strength and structural robustness which greatly reduces transfer of uncontrolled forces to other wall sections and to posts and which can be transported and assembled in a substantially continuous process which can be performed with high efficiency and much reduced cost compared with other modular wall systems in which the post and wall panel portions are not integrated. Specifically, in accordance with the invention, only a single basic shape of module is used although the modules can be varied in dimensions and some details as circumstances or a given wall design, site or installation may require as will be discussed in greater detail below.
In the elevation view of
In this regard, a variant form of the invention, an example of which is illustrated in
With further reference to
In accordance with the invention, the bottom extension of the post and panel module allows further economies to be achieved. Specifically, the invention provides for the concrete pier or caisson 20 to be formed by placing a reinforcing cage 22 in a post hole in the known manner but pouring the concrete pier or caisson only to the depth to which the bottom post portion extension will reach and leaving a length 24 of the reinforcement cage substantially equal to the length of post portion extension 18 exposed. the post portion extension 18 can then be lowered into the space within the exposed reinforcing cage portion 24 as the post and panel module 10 is set in place. The location of module 10 is then preferably supported in the correct position by temporary structures as well as by interlocking with groove 28, 28′ of the adjacent module. Then the concrete pier or caisson is completed by an additional concrete pour 26 which preferably reaches substantially to grade level. The pour 26 is thus precisely complementary to the post portion extension 18 and becomes substantially integral therewith due to inclusion of the reinforcement cage 22 surrounding post portion extension 18. The bonding to extension 18 and pier or caisson 20 may be enhanced through surface treatment of the extension 18 and/or use of commercially available bonding agents which can be applied thereto in liquid form although the potential benefit thereof is not believed to be significant relative to the strength obtained through the final structure itself. Once pour 26 has been allowed to cure for a suitable period of time (e.g. several days), the temporary support can be removed and the installation of a given post and panel module is complete.
It should be appreciated that the assembly and construction technique described above not only provides a structure of increased rigidity, robustness and stability, but does so using modules and reinforcement cages which need not be of a length to require special equipment for transportation. For example, numerous wall modules 10 may be carried in a stacked configuration or with the panel portions (which generally extend about five to eight feet) oriented vertically on a flat bed truck. Further, it should be appreciated from the cross-sections of the integral post and panel module shown in
In
The process begins with preparation of a post hole which will include an enlarged portion 61 and a drilled portion 62 which extends to a substantial depth in undisturbed soil and well past any so-called freeze line or depth as depicted at sequence T1. At sequence T2, a reinforcement cage 22 (
When the concrete thus poured has cured sufficiently, an integrated post and panel module 10 is placed such that post portion extension 18 is positioned within the exposed portion 24 of reinforcement cage 22 as alluded to above and as indicated at sequence T4. Positioning of the currently placed module 10 is facilitated by inserting the distal end of the panel portion 14 into groove 28 on a previously placed module 10′ as indicated by arrow 64 although such insertion or even previous installation (or, possibly, merely positioning) of an adjacent module as indicated at sequence T5 are not required. Then, at sequence T6, the concrete pier or caisson is completed with extension 18 embedded therein by a further concrete pour 26, as alluded to above. It should be noted that while it is not necessary for any panel portion to enter the ground and a substantial gap may be permitted between the bottom of the panel portion and the existing grade (since substantial noise attenuation will be achieved at ground level by vegetation or the like) in some cases it may be desirable for part of the panel portion to be below grade, possibly for support in addition to or in place of any temporary support structure such as scaffolding 65 which may be provided to support the modules 10 during curing of pour 26 as shown at 66. Once pour 26 has sufficiently cured, supports 65 can be removed and the wall portion to the right of operation sequence T7 is complete although any excess height of extension 16 can be optionally removed.
In view of the foregoing, it is seen that the invention provides a post and panel module for construction of a wall which provides substantial economies in the manufacture of the post and panel module with simplified casting forms or equipment, substantial economies of transportation of the modules to the construction site and even further economies in assembly and construction of walls through enabling use of a single sequence of operations which can be completed quickly and with minimal equipment and movement thereof. Moreover, the invention provides a completed wall of superior robustness, strength, stability and safety while minimizing costs of repairs which may be caused by settling, shifting or damage, particularly as applied to walls which form an acoustic barrier.
While the invention has been described in terms of a single preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/243,323, filed Sep. 18, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1467470 | Borg | Sep 1923 | A |
1544863 | Ross | Jul 1925 | A |
3991532 | Buxbom | Nov 1976 | A |
4386762 | Collins | Jun 1983 | A |
4434600 | Backman | Mar 1984 | A |
4519729 | Clarke et al. | May 1985 | A |
5134815 | Pickett | Aug 1992 | A |
5218797 | Kruse | Jun 1993 | A |
5501057 | Dawson | Mar 1996 | A |
5524405 | Byrd | Jun 1996 | A |
5689927 | Knight, Sr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5887404 | Kreizinger | Mar 1999 | A |
6000182 | Keenan | Dec 1999 | A |
6299142 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6609347 | Morrow | Aug 2003 | B2 |
7802409 | Stott | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20020184848 | Dowland | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
59224727 | Dec 1984 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110067341 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61243823 | Sep 2009 | US |