The goal of a wallboard installation is safe, structurally-sound, durable, and aesthetically-pleasing wall and/or ceiling surfaces in commercial and residential applications.
Prior-art wallboard installation methods (e.g., see Application and Finishing of Gypsum Panel Products, GA-216-2018, published in 2018 by the Gypsum Association) teach that a wallboard panel is first fastened to a framing member using fasteners that pass through the wallboard panel into the framing member. At the seam, or joint, created where two adjacent wallboard panels abut, “joint tape” is applied over the joint and a “joint compound” or “mud” is spread or “buttered” over the joint tape on an even plane to finish the joint to a level that is perceptibly smooth relative to the rest of the wallboard surfaces. The joint tape and joint compound should cover fastener heads visible after the wallboard panel is fastened to the framing member so that the fastener heads are not visible after installation. Wallboard accessories such as trim, beads (e.g., corner beads, casing beads), and control joints (i.e. expansion joints) may be used at corners, or in other specific conditions. After the joint compound has dried or cured, the dried areas may be sanded or smoothed to eliminate high spots and excess joint compound. The surface finish may be improved by repeatedly applying joint compound and smoothing the repeatedly-applied joint compound after it has dried.
The present embodiments include wallboard-fastening devices that secure wallboard panels against a framing element in an outside-corner configuration. These wallboard-fastening devices press against an edge of each wallboard continuously along the entire length of the edge, advantageously increasing structural integrity and increasing resistance to shear forces as compared to prior-art installation methods that teach securing a wallboard panel with fasteners placed apart every 16 inches (e.g., as required by some building codes). In fact, the present embodiments do not require any fasteners to pass through the wallboard panels, thereby eliminating the need to cover fastener heads that may be visible after fastening with prior-art installation methods. By eliminating fasteners that pass through the wallboard, several types of installation errors that commonly occur with prior-art methods may be avoided, such as improperly-installed fasteners that may compromise the strength of the wallboard panel and/or its attachment to the underlying framing member. Examples of improperly-installed fasteners include fasteners of the wrong type, fasteners driven so far into the wallboard panel that they penetrate past the outer paper facing of the wallboard panel, fasteners that are not installed at prescribed distances along the edge of a wallboard panel (e.g., every 16 inches), fasteners that pass too close to an edge of the wallboard panel, and fasteners that are too short to sufficiently penetrate the underlying framing member.
The above examples of installation errors are frequently the result of human error, job shortcuts, and/or improper training of wallboard installers (e.g., contractors, laborers). Thus, the present embodiments advantageously speed up installations by simplifying the installation, thereby reducing the number of errors and the amount of skill and training needed for wallboard installers. The embodiments also advantageously reduce waste and cost by minimizing materials (i.e., wallboards, joint tape, joint compound) that must be replaced when an installation error occurs.
The present embodiments also visibly cover the gap, joint, or seam between two adjacent wallboard panels, advantageously creating a treated joint without applying joint tape while avoiding the time-consuming steps of repeated applications of joint compound followed by sanding of each joint compound application. By completely removing joint tape and optionally joint compound, the present embodiments further improve structural integrity by avoiding inadequately- and/or inappropriately-applied joint tape and/or joint compound.
To achieve what is referred to in the art as a level-5 finish (i.e., the level of finish requiring the most labor and skill, often used in high-end residential construction), a wallboard installer may apply a “skim coat” over the installed wallboard panels and any exposed portions of the wallboard-fastening device. The skim coat may be applied using joint compound, plaster or any other approved skim coat finish material. The skim coat may be applied directly over the seam formed between an edge of the installed wallboard-fastening device and the visible side of the corresponding installed wallboard panels. The skim coat thus hides the seams without the need for any joint tape and/or previously applied joint compound, achieving in one day what takes several days with prior-art wallboard installation methods.
Any of the wallboard-fastening devices described herein may be affixed to an underlying framing member with fasteners that, unlike prior-art installation methods, do not pass through the wallboard panels. Once a wallboard panel is physically secured by insertion of the panel edge into the affixed wallboard-fastening device, the wallboard panel is firmly secured and sealed to the underlying framing member continuously along the entire length of the wallboard panel without any joint tape and/or joint compound. However, additional fasteners may be passed through the wallboard panel to further secure the wallboard panel to the underlying framing member.
Another advantage of the present embodiments is significantly reduced sound transmission. Due to this advantage, the present embodiments may be used as an easier-to-install alternative to resilient channel systems. Presented below are the results of a sound transmission loss test demonstrating a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 53. When used as an alternative to resilient channel, the present embodiments offer improved strength. The standard for transverse load in many current construction codes (e.g., see Section 3.2 of ICC-ES AC271) is a rating of 15 pounds per square foot (psf). Also presented below are results of a transverse-load test demonstrating an average ultimate pressure of 32 psf. Accordingly, the present embodiments can be used to create wallboard installations that are at least 50% stronger than those using prior-art resilient channel.
The present embodiments may be used with similar wallboard-mounting devices for butt joints and inside-corner joints to create a complete wallboard installation system. Examples of such wallboard-mounting devices for butt joints and inside corners can be found in International Publication No. WO 2020/168301 A1, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Many of the advantages described above also apply to the wallboard-mounting devices described in this reference. The present embodiments may be installed similarly to the outside-corner wallboard-mounting devices described in this reference.
Wallboard: a flat panel used for constructing interior walls and ceilings that frequently, although not necessarily, includes gypsum as the base material. The term “wallboard”, as used herein, includes drywall, plasterboard, sheet rock, gyprock, gypsum board, backing board, coreboard, greenboard, blueboard, cement board, soundboard, ceiling board, and the like.
Framing Member: that portion of framing, furring, bridging, blocking, etc., to which panel products are attached. Wall studs and ceiling joints are examples of framing members. A framing member may be constructed of steel, wood, or another rigid material.
Fastener: nails, screws, or staples used to mechanically affix wallboard panels.
Treated Joint: a joint between wallboard panels that is reinforced and concealed with tape and joint compound, or covered by strip moldings.
Finishing: the act of concealing joints, typically implemented with joint compound and tape; includes concealing fastener heads (when present) and edges or flanges of accessories.
Control Joint: a designed separation between neighboring wallboard panels that allows for movement caused by expansion and/or contraction of wallboard panels, framing members, and/or other components used to fasten and finish the wallboard panels.
As shown in
Mud may be applied over the nose 104, flanges 102(1) and 102(2), and outward-facing surfaces 152(1) and 152(2). After drying, the mud may be sanded down, or otherwise finished, to the region approximately bounded by the first plane 106(1), nose 104, first flange 122(1), and first outward-facing surface 152(1) to create a visibly smooth surface that covers and hides the transition where the first distal lengthwise edge 116(1) meets the first wallboard panel 102(1). The dried mud may be similarly sanded down to the region bounded by the second plane 106(2), nose 104, second flange 122(2), and second outward-facing surface 152(2) to create a visibly smooth surface that covers and hides the transition where the second distal lengthwise edge 116(2) meets the second wallboard panel 102(2). The mud may deviate from the planes 106(1) and 106(2) near the distal lengthwise edges 116(1) and 116(2) to create smoother transitions with the wallboard panels 102(1) and 102(2), thereby avoiding the formation of kinks where the mud meets the wallboard panels 102(1) and 102(2). Paint, joint compound, spray, roll-on texture, or another type of surface treatment may be applied instead of mud.
Due to the nose 104, the planes 106(1) and 106(2) form an outside corner angle 144 that is greater than 270° even though the wallboard panels 102(1) and 102(2) are perpendicular to each other (i.e., the outward-facing surfaces 151(1) and 152(2) form an outside angle approximately equal to) 270°. As shown in
The wallboard-fastening device 200 includes a first framing panel 204(1) and a second framing panel 204(2) that directly connect to each other along lengthwise edges to form an inner corner seam 206 that fits against a corner of the wall stud 304. Herein, two components connect to each other “directly” when there is no intervening component. A lengthwise edge of the first framing panel 204(1) directly connects to a lengthwise edge of the second framing panel 204(2) to form a right angle. Thus, a first inward-facing surface 234(1) of the first framing panel 204(1) and a second inward-facing surface 234(2) of the second framing panel 204(1) form an inside angle 236 of approximately 90° in the x-y plane. Herein, the term “inside” means that the surfaces 234(1) and 234(2) face the wall stud 304.
The wall stud 304 has a first stud width in the y direction and a second stud width in the x direction.
The wallboard-fastening device 200 forms a first channel 220(1) that receives the first wallboard panel 102(1) and a second channel 220(2) that receives the second wallboard panel 102(2). The first channel 220(1) is formed from the first framing panel 204(1), a first flat-spring flange 202(1), and a first bridge panel 212(1). A first lengthwise edge of the first bridge panel 212(1) directly connects to the inner corner seam 206 while a second lengthwise edge of the first bridge panel 212(1), opposite to the first lengthwise edge, directly connects to a lengthwise edge of the first flat-spring flange 202(1) to form a first outer seam 214(1). Similarly, the second channel 220(2) is formed from the second framing panel 204(2), a second flat-spring flange 202(2), and a second bridge panel 212(2). A third lengthwise edge of the second bridge panel 212(2) directly connects to the inner corner seam 206 while a fourth lengthwise edge of the second bridge panel 212(2), opposite to the third lengthwise edge, directly connects to a lengthwise edge of the second flat-spring flange 202(2) to form a second outer seam 214(2).
A width of the first bridge panel 212(1) in the x direction may be sized according to a thickness of the first wallboard panel 102(1) (e.g., ½″ or ⅝″). Similarly, a width of the second bridge panel 212(2) in the y direction may be sized according to a thickness of the second wallboard panel 102(2). In
The wallboard-fastening device 200 also includes a first corner panel 208(1) and a second corner panel 208(2) that directly connect to each other to form an outer corner seam 210. Specifically, the first corner panel 208(1) has first and second lengthwise edges and the second corner panel 208(2) has third and fourth lengthwise edges. The first lengthwise edge directly connects to the third lengthwise edge such that the corner panels 208(1) and 208(2) form an inside angle 342 of approximately 90°. Each of the corner panels 208(1) and 208(2) has a uniform thickness, and therefore the corner panels 208(1) and 208(2) form an outside angle 344 of 270°. Herein, the term “outside” means that the angle 344 is defined with respect to outward-facing surfaces of the corner panels 208(1) and 208(2) that face away from the wall stud 304. The second lengthwise edge directly connects to the first bridge panel 212(1) and the first flat-spring flange 202(1) at the first outer seam 214(1). Similarly, the fourth lengthwise edge directly connects to the second bridge panel 212(2) and the second flat-spring flange 202(2) at the second outer seam 214(2).
The first flat-spring flange 202(1) and first bridge panel 212(1) form a nominal angle 232 in the x-y plane that is less than 90°. For example, the nominal angle 232 may be 85°, 87°, or 89°. Equivalently, the first flat-spring flange 202(1) forms an acute angle 238 with the mathematical plane of the first corner panel 208(1), where the acute angle 238 is equal to 90° less the nominal angle 232. Thus, the first flat-spring flange 202(1) is not parallel to the first framing panel 204(1) when the first wallboard panel 102(1) is absent from (i.e., not inserted into) the first channel 220(1). Furthermore, a width of the first channel 220(1) (i.e., the distance in the x direction between the first flat-spring flange 202(1) and first framing panel 204(1)) is greatest near the first bridge panel 212(1) and decreases with increasing distance from the first bridge panel 212(1) (i.e., increasing values of y). Similar arguments hold for the second flat-spring flange 202(2), second bridge panel 212(2), and second channel 220(2).
The first flat-spring flange 202(1) may be flexed to increase the nominal angle 232, thereby opening the first channel 220(1) to facilitate insertion of the first wallboard panel 102(1) therein. After the first wallboard panel 102(1) has been inserted into the first channel 220(1), the first flat-spring flange 202(1) may be released, coming to rest forming, with the first bridge panel 212(1), a rest angle 232′ of approximately 90°. In this position, the first flat-spring flange 202(1) is parallel to the first framing panel 204(1) and coplanar with the first corner panel 208(1). Similar arguments hold for the second flat-spring flange 202(2) when the second wallboard panel 102(2) is inserted into the second channel 220(2). Accordingly, the wallboard panels 102(1) and 102(2) are perpendicular to each other, as shown in
The first flat-spring flange 202(1) exerts a first restoring force on the first wallboard panel 102(1) to push first wallboard panel 102(1) against the first framing panel 204(1), thereby physically securing the first wallboard panel 102(2) with respect to the wall stud 304. Similarly, the second flat-spring flange 202(2) exerts a second restoring force on the second wallboard panel 102(2) to push the second wallboard panel 102(2) against the second framing panel 204(1), thereby physically securing the second wallboard panel 102(2) with respect to the wall stud 304.
Each of the flat-spring flanges 202(1) and 202(2) may be considered a spring with a spring constant. The spring constant, and thus the magnitude of the restoring forces, is determined by the geometry of the flat-spring flanges 202(1) and 202(2) (e.g., thickness and width), the nominal angle 232, and material properties (e.g., Young's modulus) of the material forming the wallboard-fastening device 200. In the small-angle approximation and assuming that the flat-spring flanges 202(1) and 202(2) are not flexed beyond their elastic limit, the magnitude of these restoring forces scales linearly with an angular deviation from the nominal angle 232. The material may be plastic, such as PVC plastic, vinyl or another material with which the wallboard-fastening device 200 may be manufactured via extrusion. Thus, for a given material, the restoring forces may be selected by choosing an appropriate thickness of the flat-spring flanges 202(1), 202(2) and an appropriate nominal angle 232.
In
In the example of
The wallboard-fastening device 200 also includes a nose 228 that directly connects to the outer corner seam 210. The nose 228 may be a thin strip with opposing first and second lengthwise edges. The first lengthwise edge directly connects to the outer corner seam 210 while the second lengthwise edge extends away from the outer corner seam 210. In
As shown in
To enhance adhesion of the mud 402 to the wallboard-fastening device 200, the outward-facing surfaces of the corner panels 208(1), 208(2) and flat-spring flanges 202(1), 202(2) may be textured. For example, these outward-facing surfaces may form ridges, as shown in
A length of the wallboard-fastening device 200, in the z direction, may be selected to match a corresponding length of the wallboard panels 102(1) and 102(2) (e.g., 4′ or 8′). As shown in
The third thickness 724 may be less than the second thickness 722. In this case, all thicknesses of the first tapered flat-spring flange 702(1) are less than all thicknesses of the first tapered corner panel 708(1). In some embodiments, the thickness of the first tapered corner panel 708(1) decreases linearly along a first width direction of the first tapered corner panel 708(1). In
The outward-facing surfaces of the tapered corner panels 708(1) and 708(2) form the outside angle 344, which is greater than 270°. Thus, these outward-facing surfaces correspond to the planes 306(1) and 306(2) in
Another advantage of the wallboard-fastening device 700 is that the tapered corner panels 708(1) and 708(2) are thicker near the outer corner seam 210, as compared to the untapered (i.e., having uniform thickness) corner panels 208(1) and 208(2) shown in
Since no mud 402 covers the tapered corner panels 708(1), 708(2) and little, if any, mud 402 covers the tapered flat-spring flanges 702(1), 702(2),
Advantageously, little if any mud 402 need be applied over the tapered corner panels 708(1) and 708(2). Accordingly, the wallboard-fastening device 1000 uses less mud 402 than the wallboard-fastening device 200 of
Test Results
As described above, the present embodiments may be used with similar wallboard-mounting devices for butt joints and inside-corner joints to create a complete wallboard installation system. To test the effectiveness of this system at sound isolation, a sound transmission loss test was performed in accordance with ASTM E90-09 (2016), ASTM E413-16, ASTM E1332-16, and ASTM E2235-04 (2020). The tested specimen created a three butt joints from five pieces of ⅝″-thick gypsum board (National Gypsum Type X). The butt joints were created using wallboard-fastening devices similar to that shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 of International Publication No. WO 2020/168301 A1.
The specimen was installed inside a rectangular-shaped test opening of a filler wall that separated a receive room (volume of 234 m3) from a source room (volume of 207 m3) inside a test chamber. The test opening had a height of approximately 96″. Running horizontally along the top and bottom edges of the test opening were 25-gauge steel tracks. These tracks were affixed to the test opening using screws and isolation washers. To further isolate the tracks from the filler wall, ⅜″ Neoprene gaskets were adhered to these tracks.
Five 25-gauge steel studs (each having dimensions of 1.25″×3.625″×96″) were installed to the steel tracks and positioned with 24″ center-to-center horizontal spacing. The tested wallboard-fastening devices were made of extruded PVC. One 96″-long wallboard-fastening device was fastened with screws to each of the first, third, and fifth studs. The distance from the left edge of the test opening to the first wallboard-fastening device was approximately 3.25″. The distance between the first and second wallboard-fastening devices was approximately 48″. The distance between the second and third wallboard-fastening devices was also approximately 48″. The distance between the third wallboard-fastening device and the right edge of the test opening was approximately 3.25″.
After the five pieces of gypsum board were installed on the source-room side of the test specimen, four batts of R-13 fiberglass insulation were installed behind the gypsum boards. To finish the test specimen on the receive-rom side, the arrangement was repeated with three additional wallboard-fastening devices and five additional pieces of gypsum board. Aluminum foil tape was used to seal the gypsum board against the wallboard-fastening devices. Duct tape was used to seal the gypsum boards along their top and bottom edges. After installation, the receive-room side of the test specimen was approximately ¼″ from being flush with the receive-room face of the filler wall. A stethoscope was used to check for any abnormal air leaks around the test specimen prior to testing.
While the sound transmission loss test was performed with butt joints, it is believed that the high sound isolation is due to the fact that the gypsum boards have no screws passing through them. Therefore, comparable results are expected for corner joints, including outside-corner joints that are formed with the present embodiments. Therefore, a wallboard installation system using the present embodiments can serve as an alternative to prior-art resilient channel systems that is advantageously easier to install.
To determine the strength of these wallboard installation systems, a traverse-load test was performed in accordance with ASTM E72 (Section 11) per ICC-ES AC271. Test specimens were constructed from two pieces of ⅝″-thick type-X drywall (Exacor™ sheathing), each measuring 24″×96″. A butt joint was created from these two pieces of drywall using a 96″-long wallboard-fastening device like that shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 of International Publication No. WO 2020/168301 A1. Affixed to each of the two remaining 96″-long edges of the drywall pieces was a 96″-long outside-corner wallboard-fastening device similar to that shown in FIGS. 13 and 14 of International Publication No. WO 2020/16830 (except with the third framing panel 1320). The wallboard-fastening devices were made from extruded PVC and were affixed to underlying studs (Clark Dietrich ProSTUD® 25 ga. EQ×3⅝″ Web×1¼″ Flange) using #18-8¾″-length self-drilling screws spaced 18″ apart. Ends of the studs were affixed to a top plate and a bottom plate (Clark Dietrich ProTRAK® 25 ga. EQ×3⅝″ Web×1¼ Flange) using #18-8½″-length self-drilling screws. The studs were spaced 24″ apart (center-to-center).
Three specimens (numbered 1-3) were used for positive pressure testing. An additional three specimens (numbered 4-6) were used for negative pressure testing. For comparison, an additional specimen (numbered 7) was constructed using commercially available resilient channel (Clark Dietrich RC-1 Pro™ 25 ga.×2-in.×½-in. deep with 1¼-in. flange).
The test setup consisted of a vacuum chamber with an open side slightly larger than the test specimens. A vacuum pump and manometer connection provided a means to apply and monitor the applied pressure. Each specimen was placed in the test setup in the desired orientation. Polyethylene sheeting was placed to provide the specified positive or negative load. The polyethylene sheathing was pleated to accommodate sample deflection and was sealed to the vacuum chamber. The manner in which the polyethylene sheathing was used did not influence the outcome of the test.
Instrumentation included a water manometer and dial indicators. The dial indicators had a resolution of 0.001 inches. One dial indicator was placed at the center of the specimen. A second dial indicator was placed along the edge of the specimen. A third dial indicator was placed half-way between the first and second dial indicators.
Each specimen was loaded in ¼ live load increments. At each stage, deflection readings were taken immediately upon reaching the target load and again after five minutes of continued load application. The applied load was then removed and the specimen was allowed to recover. During the recovery period, dial gauge readings were taken immediately upon removing the load and again after five minutes has elapsed. The loading and unloading cycles were continued as specified. Once the deflection measurement loading stages were completed, the deflection gauges were removed, and the load was increased to ultimate. At ultimate, the mode of failure and ultimate load were recorded. At any time during the test, when the behavior of the specimen under load indicated that sudden failure may occur the dial indicators may have been removed.
The following table summarizes the test results:
For negative pressure, the average ultimate pressure of specimens 1-3 is 32. For pressure, the average ultimate pressure of specimens 4-6 is 47 psf. By comparison, the prior-art system of specimen 7 only achieved an ultimate pressure of 24 (for negative pressure orientation).
During these tests, specimens 1-6 never failed, i.e., the wallboard panels remained secured. Instead, the testing was limited by buckling of the 25-gauge-steel studs. With sturdier studs, an average ultimate pressure in excess of 40 (for negative pressure orientations) can be reasonably expected. Accordingly, the present embodiments can be used to create wallboard installations that are at least 50% stronger than those using prior-art resilient channel.
Changes may be made in the above methods and systems without departing from the scope hereof. It should thus be noted that the matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings should be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. The following claims are intended to cover all generic and specific features described herein, as well as all statements of the scope of the present method and system, which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/238,520, filed on Aug. 30, 2021, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1804564 | McChesney | May 1931 | A |
2379179 | Peterson | Jun 1945 | A |
3206806 | Powell | Sep 1965 | A |
3445972 | Carr | May 1969 | A |
3989397 | Baker | Nov 1976 | A |
5531050 | Stibolt et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5974748 | Sciuga et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6341458 | Burt | Jan 2002 | B1 |
8061105 | Haga | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20030024188 | Smythe, Jr. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050257461 | Daly, IV | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060283115 | Robertson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20120304568 | Aboukhalil | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2019014495 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2020168301 | Aug 2020 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230068997 A1 | Mar 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63238520 | Aug 2021 | US |