Patent Grant
10612899
The invention relates to a warhead.
A method for manufacturing a fragmentation casing for warheads and the like is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,129,061 BEDALL ET AL. In an outer cylindrical recess of a shell base body a single layer of heavy metal balls together with metal powder hardenable by sintering is introduced and compressed to form a stable sleeve-shaped splinter mantel around the shell base body.
This known manufacturing process requires heat and pressure for sintering the material in which the single layer of metal balls is embedded. Furthermore it is limited to one type of preformed splinters, namely to metal balls of uniform size being arranged in a single layer.
A hollow charge warhead is known from GB 1,171,362 which comprises pre-shaped fragments in the form of metal balls. It further discloses that spherical fragments together with incendiary bodies may be embedded in a synthetic resin. The hollow charge is said to be effective against hard targets and the metal balls are said to be effective against soft targets. Therefore only one type of pre-shaped fragments for soft targets in the form of balls is disclosed. Another drawback of this known warhead consists in the fact that its fragmentation casing comprising the metal balls being contained within a cylindrical housing, i.e. does not form the outer surface of the warhead, thereby diminishing the effect of the fragments.
A configured blast fragmentation warhead is known from U.S. Pat. No. 3,853,059 which comprises several fragment layers encased in a shroud, i.e. the several fragment layers do not form the outer surface of the warhead, thereby diminishing the effect of the fragments. No spherical pre-shaped fragments are disclosed.
It is an object of the invention to provide a warhead allowing a combination of manageable complexity and simplified manufacturing.
The invention solves the posed problem with a warhead as disclosed and claimed herein.
The advantages of the warhead according to the invention are the following:
Further advantageous embodiments of the invention can be commented as follows:
In a special embodiment the multitude of the first fracture elements is in the form of a cohesive structure. The cohesive structure of pre-shaped first fracture elements is used in the present application as definition of a construct consisting of a plurality of the first fracture elements having a non-spherical shape and being connected with each other, by means of e.g. single cross-braces that form a mesh. Such a cohesive structure can be formed of the first structure elements and the cross-braces either as a one-piece structure or a multi-part structure. Alternatively, the cohesive structure of the multitude of the first structure elements can be formed by as a single layer provided with grooves therein, so that the single first fracture elements are formed by the grooves in the layer.
In a further embodiment the warhead comprises a first matrix in which the first fracture elements are embedded.
In a further embodiment the warhead comprises a second matrix in which the second fracture elements are embedded.
In another embodiment the warhead comprises a single matrix in which the first fractures elements and the second fracture elements are embedded.
In a further embodiment the first matrix comprises the following materials: polymer and/or reactive metal foam.
In a further embodiment the second matrix comprises the following materials: polymer and/or reactive metal foam.
In another embodiment the single matrix comprises the following materials: polymer and/or reactive metal foam.
In a further embodiment the reactive metal foam comprises aluminium and/or magnesium as basic material. The combustible metal foam comprising aluminium and/or magnesium allows the advantage of weight reduction of the warhead and an additional significant blast-effect.
In a further embodiment the first fracture elements are formed to a cohesive structure by thermal sintering.
In a further embodiment the thickness of the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements is variable over the structure, whereby the cohesive structure has a maximal thickness Dmax and a minimal thickness Dmin.
In a further embodiment the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements has a minimal thickness in the range between 0.7 mm and 2.0 mm. The minimal thickness of 0.7 mm is suitable for non-penetrating systems, whereby the minimal thickness of at least 2.0 mm is suitable for perforators.
In a further embodiment the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements is formed as a mesh.
In a further embodiment the second fracture elements are provided in the region of the maximal thickness Dmax of the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements only.
In another embodiment the second fracture elements are provided in the region of the minimal thickness Dmin of the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements only.
In again another embodiment the second fracture elements are provided in the regions of the minimal thickness Dmin and in the region the maximal thickness Dmax of the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements.
In a further embodiment the first fracture elements and second fracture elements are arranged in a single plane of the outer wall portion.
In a further embodiment the second matrix is provided in the regions of the minimal thickness Dmin and in the region the maximal thickness Dmax of the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements.
In another embodiment the second matrix is provided in the region of the maximal thickness Dmax of the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements only.
In again a further embodiment the second matrix is provided in the region of the minimal thickness Dmin of the cohesive structure of the first fracture elements only.
The several above mentioned arrangements of the first fracture elements, the second fracture elements and the matrix relatively to each other allow a structural integrity with a minimal loss-of-material as well as an optimized lethality due to the control of the form and the energy of the first and second fracture elements.
In a further embodiment the first fracture elements and the second fracture elements comprise different materials.
In a further embodiment the first fracture elements are shaped at least partly as polyhedrons, and in particular have a cuboid, parallelepipedic or tetrahedral shape. This shape is more efficient for hard targets, like vehicles.
In a further embodiment the first fracture elements and the second fracture elements comprise a material with a density of at least 4 g/cm3.
In a further embodiment the first fracture elements comprise a metal, metallic alloy or metal carbide, preferably steel, tungsten, tungsten carbide or aluminum.
In a further embodiment the second fracture elements comprise: steel, tungsten or molybdenum.
In a further embodiment the warhead is a hollow charge warhead.
In a further embodiment at least a part of the outer wall portion containing the first and second fracture elements is tapering towards the front. This arrangement of the conical portion and the cylindrical portion allows the front spray of fragments by explosion of the explosive charge of the warhead.
In another embodiment at least a part of the outer wall portion containing the first and second fracture elements is tapering towards the rear. This arrangement of the conical portion and the cylindrical portion allows the back spray of fragments by explosion of the explosive charge of the warhead.
In a further embodiment the tapering is generally conical with a half cone angle φ1 being greater than 5 degrees.
In a further embodiment the tapering is generally conical with a half cone angle φ1 being smaller than 7 degrees.
Typically, the generally conical tapering has a half cone angle φ1 being 6 degree.
In a further embodiment the first fracture elements are arranged in a single layer.
In a further embodiment the second fracture elements are arranged in a single layer.
These above described embodiments have an advantage of a simplified manufacturing and—resulting therefrom—low costs of manufacture.
In a further embodiment a perforator is attached to the front region.
In a further embodiment the tubular structure comprises a discontinuity in the area of the outer wall portion containing the first and second fracture elements, whereby this discontinuity is running radially to the tubular structure.
In a further embodiment the outer wall portion containing the first and second fracture elements comprises a hollow generally cylindrical portion and a hollow generally conical portion.
In a further embodiment the generally cylindrical portion is arranged between the generally conical portion and the rear end. This arrangement of the conical portion and the cylindrical portion allows the front spray of fragments by explosion of the explosive charge of the warhead.
In another embodiment the generally conical portion is arranged between the generally cylindrical portion and the rear end. This arrangement of the conical portion and the cylindrical portion allows the back spray of fragments by explosion of the explosive charge of the warhead.
In a further embodiment the generally conical portion has a full cone angle of φ2 in the range of 4 to 30 degree, preferably in the range of 6 to 20 degree.
In a further embodiment the discontinuity has a form of a bend, preferably of a sharp bend.
In a further embodiment the bend has a minimal bend of 4 degrees.
In a further embodiment the bend has a maximal bend of 15 degrees.
In a further embodiment the warhead does not comprise any outer layer over the first fracture elements.
In a further embodiment the warhead does not comprise any outer layer over the second fracture elements.
In a further embodiment at least a part of the outer wall portion does not contain any fracture elements.
In a further embodiment the weight ratio of the multitude of the first fracture elements and the multitude of the second fracture elements is in the range from 1:10 to 10:1.
“Perforator”: A perforator is a specially designed part of a warhead which is able to perforate structures like bricks, sand and concrete by means of their kinetic energy.
“Sintering”: Sintering is the process of compacting and forming a solid mass of material by heat and/or pressure without melting it to the point of liquefaction.
“Reactive metal foam”: A metal foam is a cellular structure consisting of a solid metal and a large volume fraction of gas-filled pores. The reactive metal foam comprises combustible materials as e.g. aluminium and/or magnesium as basic material.
“Fragments”: The term “fragments” means in the present specification any pre-shaped fragmentations or splinters made of various hard or hardenable materials.
Several embodiments of the invention will be described in the following by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The embodiment of the warhead 1 according to the
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination or as suitable in any other described embodiment of the invention. Certain features described in the context of various embodiments are not to be considered essential features of those embodiments, unless the embodiment is inoperative without those elements.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CH2016/000005 | 1/15/2016 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2017/120684 | 7/20/2017 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 791679 | Edmunds | Jun 1905 | A |
| 1006875 | Puff | Oct 1911 | A |
| 3498224 | Cordle | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3566794 | Pearson | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3799054 | LaRocca | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3815504 | Tieben | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3853059 | Moe | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3945321 | Mayer | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4129061 | Bedall | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4292829 | Weber | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4305333 | Altenau | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4312274 | Zernow | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4327643 | Lasheras Barrios | May 1982 | A |
| 4381692 | Weintraub | May 1983 | A |
| 4516501 | Held | May 1985 | A |
| 4655139 | Wilhelm | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4664035 | Osofsky | May 1987 | A |
| 4745864 | Craddock | May 1988 | A |
| 4982668 | Bender | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5313890 | Cuadros | May 1994 | A |
| 5337673 | Koontz | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5540156 | Fong | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544589 | Held | Aug 1996 | A |
| 6145441 | Woodall | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6484642 | Kuhns | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6962113 | Carlson | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6966265 | Ronn | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7624682 | Lloyd | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7743707 | Melin | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7886667 | Baker | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 8161884 | Kokodis | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8973503 | Dunaway | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9759533 | Bruno | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9784541 | Genson | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 20030164108 | Ronn | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167956 | Kellner | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040011238 | Ronn | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20050067072 | Vavrick | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087088 | Lacy | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20070277914 | Hugus | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20090211484 | Truitt | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100199875 | Weihrauch | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20130255524 | Simon et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140182474 | Dunaway | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20170299964 | Manz | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2344173 | Apr 1975 | DE |
| 2557676 | Jun 1977 | DE |
| 2992408 | Dec 2013 | FR |
| 1171362 | Nov 1969 | GB |
| 2014014895 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190033047 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
