This application is directed generally to papermaking, and more specifically to fabrics employed in papermaking.
In the conventional fourdrinier papermaking process, a water slurry, or suspension, of cellulosic fibers (known as the paper “stock”) is fed onto the top of the upper run of an endless belt of woven wire and/or synthetic material that travels between two or more rolls. The belt, often referred to as a “forming fabric,” provides a papermaking surface on the upper surface of its upper run which operates as a filter to separate the cellulosic fibers of the paper stock from the aqueous medium, thereby forming a wet paper web. The aqueous medium drains through mesh openings of the forming fabric, known as drainage holes, by gravity or vacuum located on the lower surface of the upper run (i.e., the “machine side”) of the fabric.
After leaving the forming section, the paper web is transferred to a press section of the paper machine, where it is passed through the nips of one or more pairs of pressure rollers covered with another fabric, typically referred to as a “press felt.” Pressure from the rollers removes additional moisture from the web; the moisture removal is often enhanced by the presence of a “batt” layer of the press felt. The paper is then transferred to a dryer section for further moisture removal. After drying, the paper is ready for secondary processing and packaging.
As used herein, the terms machine direction (“MD”) and cross machine direction (“CMD”) refer, respectively, to a direction aligned with the direction of travel of the papermakers' fabric on the papermaking machine, and a direction parallel to the fabric surface and traverse to the direction of travel. Likewise, directional references to the vertical relationship of the yarns in the fabric (e.g., above, below, top, bottom, beneath, etc.) assume that the papermaking surface of the fabric is the top of the fabric and the machine side surface of the fabric is the bottom of the fabric.
Typically, papermaker's fabrics are manufactured as endless belts by one of two basic weaving techniques. In the first of these techniques, fabrics are flat woven by a flat weaving process, with their ends being joined to form an endless belt by any one of a number of well-known joining methods, such as dismantling and reweaving the ends together (commonly known as splicing), or sewing on a pin-seamable flap or a special foldback on each end, then reweaving these into pin-seamable loops. A number of auto-joining machines are now commercially available, which for certain fabrics may be used to automate the joining process. In a flat woven papermaker's fabric, the warp yarns extend in the machine direction and the filling yarns extend in the cross machine direction.
In the second basic weaving technique, fabrics are woven directly in the form of a continuous belt with an endless weaving process. In the endless weaving process, the warp yarns extend in the cross machine direction and the filling yarns extend in the machine direction. Both weaving methods described hereinabove are well known in the art, and the term “endless belt” as used herein refers to belts made by either method.
Effective sheet and fiber support are important considerations in papermaking, especially for the forming section of the papermaking machine, where the wet web is initially formed. Additionally, the forming fabrics should exhibit good stability when they are run at high speeds on the papermaking machines, and preferably are highly permeable to reduce the amount of water retained in the web when it is transferred to the press section of the paper machine. In both tissue and fine paper applications (i.e., paper for use in quality printing, carbonizing, cigarettes, electrical condensers, and like) the papermaking surface comprises a very finely woven structure.
Typically, finely woven fabrics such as those used in fine paper and tissue applications include at least some relatively small diameter machine direction or cross machine direction yarns. Regrettably, however, such yarns tend to be delicate, leading to a short surface life for the fabric. Moreover, the use of smaller yarns can also adversely affect the mechanical stability of the fabric (especially in terms of skew resistance, narrowing propensity and stiffness), which may negatively impact both the service life and the performance of the fabric.
To combat these problems associated with fine weave fabrics, multi-layer forming fabrics have been developed with fine-mesh yarns on the paper forming surface to facilitate paper formation and coarser-mesh yarns on the machine contact side to provide strength and durability. For example, fabrics have been constructed which employ one set of machine direction yarns which interweave with two sets of cross machine direction yarns to form a fabric having a fine paper forming surface and a more durable machine side surface. These fabrics form part of a class of fabrics which are generally referred to as “double layer” fabrics. Similarly, fabrics have been constructed which include two sets of machine direction yarns and two sets of cross machine direction yarns that form a fine mesh paperside fabric layer and a separate, coarser machine side fabric layer. In these fabrics, which are part of a class of fabrics generally referred to as “triple layer” fabrics, the two fabric layers are typically bound together by separate stitching yarns. However, they may also be bound together using yarns from one or more of the sets of bottom and top cross machine direction and machine direction yarns. As double and triple layer fabrics include additional sets of yarn as compared to single layer fabrics, these fabrics typically have a higher “caliper” (i.e., they are thicker) than comparable single layer fabrics. An illustrative double layer fabric is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,423,755 to Thompson, and illustrative triple layer fabrics are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,303 to Osterberg, U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,326 to Vohringer, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,437,315 and 5,967,195 to Ward, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,745,797 to Troughton.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,896,009 and co-pending and co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/207,277, filed Aug. 18, 2005, describe a number of exemplary multi-layer forming fabrics that are “warped-stitched.” In some instances such fabrics may be easier to manufacture than weft-stitched forming fabrics and/or may have desirable performance properties. However, there is still a demand for additional types of warp-stitched fabrics to meet the vast array of papermaking needs.
As a first aspect, embodiments of the present invention are directed to a papermaker's fabric comprising a plurality of repeat units of interwoven yarns, each repeat unit comprising: a set of top MD yarns; a set of top CMD yarns interwoven with the top MD yarns; a set of bottom MD yarns; and a set of bottom CMD yarns interwoven with the bottom MD yarns. In interweaving with the top CMD yarns, some of the top MD yarns include a segment in which the top MD yarn passes below a subset of three consecutive top CMD yarns. Each of the bottom MD yarns forms a knuckle over one of the three top CMD yarns of the subset that a top MD yarn located immediately thereabove passes below. The set of bottom CMD yarns includes at least twice as many yarns as does the set of bottom MD yarns.
As a second aspect, embodiments of the present invention are directed to a papermaker's fabric comprising a plurality of repeat units of interwoven yarns, each repeat unit comprising: a set of top MD yarns; a set of top CMD yarns interwoven with the top MD yarns; a set of bottom MD yarns; and a set of bottom CMD yarns interwoven with the bottom MD yarns. In interweaving with the top CMD yarns, some of the top MD yarns include a segment in which the top MD yarn passes below a subset of three consecutive top CMD yarns. Each of the bottom MD yarns forms a knuckle over one of the three top CMD yarns of the subset that a top MD yarn located immediately thereabove passes below. In interweaving with the bottom CMD yarn, the bottom MD yarns form machine side knuckles thereunder, the top CMD yarn that each bottom MD yarn passes over to form a knuckle is substantially centered between two machine side knuckles, and at least four bottom CMD yarns are positioned between the two machine side knuckles.
As a third aspect, embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method of making paper comprising the steps of: (a) providing a papermaker's fabric of the type described above, (b) depositing paper stock on the papermaker's fabric; and (c) removing moisture from the paper stock.
The present invention will be described more particularly hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention is not intended to be limited to the illustrated embodiments; rather, these embodiments are intended to fully and completely disclose the invention to those skilled in this art. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements throughout. Thicknesses and dimensions of some components may be exaggerated for clarity.
Well-known functions or constructions may not be described in detail for brevity and/or clarity.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. As used herein the expression “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
Although the figures below only show single repeat units of the fabrics illustrated therein, those of skill in the art will appreciate that in commercial applications the repeat units shown in the figures would be repeated many times, in both the machine and cross machine directions, to form a large fabric suitable for use on a papermaking machine.
Referring now to the drawings, a sixteen harness fabric, designated broadly at 10, is shown in
Turning first to
Looking now at
Referring still to
Turning now to
Looking still at
Looking now at
The fabric 10 can provide certain performance benefits as compared to prior fabrics. One benefit is a higher permeability in the fabric, particularly for fabrics that include fine yarns. As the diameter of yarns decreases (which may be desirable in order to reduce marking on the paper stock applied to the fabric), the mesh of the fabric can become more dense, which can decrease the permeability of the fabric. Also, the stitching points themselves can decrease permeability. By employing a fabric with fewer stitching points per repeat unit than prior fabrics (which can be done with an N×2N bottom layer), the permeability can remain at acceptable or even increased levels, even with fine yarns.
Another benefit that can be achieved with fabrics of the present invention is a lack of edge curl in the fabric. In prior fabrics, the inclusion of four different types of MD yarns (typical top MD yarns, top MD yarns with a “dropped” knuckle”, non-stitching bottom MD yarns, and stitching bottom MD yarns) meant that four different “crimps” needed to be coupled in the fabric. Balancing these different crimps was difficult and typically resulted in a fabric with edge curl. However, in the fabric 10, there are only three different types of MD yarns (as the fabric 10 has no non-stitching MD yarns), so balancing the crimp becomes more manageable.
Also, it should be noted that the bottom MD yarns stitch over a top CMD yarn that is substantially centered between bottom MD knuckles formed by the bottom MD yarns below bottom CMD yarns. For example, and referring to
Those skilled in this art will appreciate that fabrics of other weave patterns may also be employed. For example, although a sixteen harness fabric is illustrated and described herein, fabrics of twelve, twenty, twenty-four or more harnesses can also be envisioned. Moreover, different numbers of CMD yarns may be employed. Also, in the illustrated embodiment, there are twice as many top CMD yarns as bottom CDM yarns; however, in some embodiments this ratio may differ; as an example, in some embodiments equal numbers of top and bottom CMD yarns may be employed.
In addition, although in the fabric 10 equal numbers of top MD yarns with and without segments of “missing top knuckles” are included, in some embodiments a higher or lower ratio of top MD yarns with and without segments of missing top knuckles may be included; also, in the fabric 10, the yarns with segments of missing top knuckles alternate with yarns that have no such segments, but in other embodiments yarns with such segments may not alternate with yarns without such segments. An another alternative, each of the bottom MD yarns may stitch with more than one top CMD yarn, and/or each of the bottom MD yarns may form more or fewer than four knuckles below bottom CMD yarns.
Further, although a plain weave top surface is shown herein, other weave patterns, such as twills and satins, may also be used. Also, different bottom weave patterns may be used as desired.
The fabrics pictured and otherwise described and claimed herein may be employed in a variety of applications, including forming fine paper grades, tissue paper, brown paper and newsprint, but is especially beneficial for fine paper, newsprint and brown paper applications.
The configurations of the individual yarns utilized in the fabrics of the present invention can vary, depending upon the desired properties of the final papermakers′ fabric. For example, the yarns may be multifilament yarns, monofilament yarns, twisted multifilament or monofilament yarns, spun yarns, or any combination thereof. Also, the materials comprising yarns employed in the fabric of the present invention may be those commonly used in papermakers' fabric. For example, the yarns may be formed of polypropylene, polyester, nylon, or the like. The skilled artisan should select a yarn material according to the particular application of the final fabric.
Regarding yarn dimensions, the particular size of the yarns is typically governed by the mesh of the papermaking surface. In a typical embodiment of the triple layer fabrics disclosed herein, the diameter of the top CMD yarns and all of the MD yarns is between about 0.10 and 0.25 mm, and the diameter of the bottom CMD yarns is between about 0.20 and 0.50 mm. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that yarns having diameters outside the above ranges may be used in certain applications. In one embodiment of the present invention, the top CMD yarns and all of the MD yarns have diameters between about 0.15 and 0.17 mm, and the diameter of the bottom CMD yarns is between about 0.25 and 0.40 mm to provide fabrics with a target top mesh of 75×75 yarns per inch. Fabrics employing these yarn sizes may be implemented with polyester yarns or a combination of polyester and nylon yarns. An exemplary embodiment of the fabric 10 is set forth in Table 1.
Pursuant to another aspect of the present invention, methods of making paper are provided. Pursuant to these methods, one of the exemplary papermaker's forming fabrics described herein is provided, and paper is then made by applying paper stock to the forming fabric and by then removing moisture from the paper stock. As the details of how the paper stock is applied to the forming fabric and how moisture is removed from the paper stock is well understood by those of skill in the art, additional details regarding this aspect of the present invention will not be provided herein.
The foregoing embodiments are illustrative of the present invention, and are not to be construed as limiting thereof. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2172430 | Barrell | Sep 1939 | A |
2554034 | Koester et al. | May 1951 | A |
3094149 | Keily | Jun 1963 | A |
3325909 | Clark | Jun 1967 | A |
4093512 | Fleischer | Jun 1978 | A |
4182381 | Gisbourne | Jan 1980 | A |
4244543 | Ericson | Jan 1981 | A |
4289173 | Miller | Sep 1981 | A |
4290209 | Buchanan et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4414263 | Miller et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4438788 | Harwood | Mar 1984 | A |
4452284 | Eckstein et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4453573 | Thompson | Jun 1984 | A |
4501303 | Osterberg | Feb 1985 | A |
4515853 | Borel | May 1985 | A |
4529013 | Miller | Jul 1985 | A |
4564052 | Borel | Jan 1986 | A |
4564551 | Best | Jan 1986 | A |
4592395 | Borel | Jun 1986 | A |
4592396 | Borel et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4605585 | Johansson | Aug 1986 | A |
4611639 | Bugge | Sep 1986 | A |
4621663 | Malmendier | Nov 1986 | A |
4633596 | Josef | Jan 1987 | A |
4636426 | Fleischer | Jan 1987 | A |
4642261 | Fearnhead | Feb 1987 | A |
4676278 | Dutt | Jun 1987 | A |
4705601 | Chiu | Nov 1987 | A |
4709732 | Kinnunen | Dec 1987 | A |
4729412 | Bugge | Mar 1988 | A |
4731281 | Fleischer et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4739803 | Borel | Apr 1988 | A |
4755420 | Baker et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759975 | Sutherland et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4815499 | Johnson | Mar 1989 | A |
4815503 | Borel | Mar 1989 | A |
4909284 | Kositzke | Mar 1990 | A |
RE33195 | McDonald et al. | Apr 1990 | E |
4934414 | Borel | Jun 1990 | A |
4941514 | Taipale | Jul 1990 | A |
4942077 | Wendt et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945952 | Vöhringer | Aug 1990 | A |
4967805 | Chiu et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4987929 | Wilson | Jan 1991 | A |
4989647 | Marchand | Feb 1991 | A |
4989648 | Tate et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998568 | Vohringer | Mar 1991 | A |
4998569 | Tate | Mar 1991 | A |
5022441 | Tate et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5025839 | Wright | Jun 1991 | A |
5067526 | Herring | Nov 1991 | A |
5074339 | Vohringer | Dec 1991 | A |
5084326 | Vohringer | Jan 1992 | A |
5092372 | Fitzka et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101866 | Quigley | Apr 1992 | A |
5116478 | Tate et al. | May 1992 | A |
5152326 | Vohringer | Oct 1992 | A |
5158118 | Tate et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5219004 | Chiu | Jun 1993 | A |
5228482 | Fleischer | Jul 1993 | A |
5277967 | Zehle et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5358014 | Kovar | Oct 1994 | A |
5421374 | Wright | Jun 1995 | A |
5421375 | Praetzel | Jun 1995 | A |
5429686 | Chiu et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437315 | Ward | Aug 1995 | A |
5449026 | Lee | Sep 1995 | A |
5454405 | Hawes | Oct 1995 | A |
5456293 | Ostermayer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465764 | Eschmann et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482567 | Barreto | Jan 1996 | A |
5487414 | Kuji et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5518042 | Wilson | May 1996 | A |
5520225 | Quigley et al. | May 1996 | A |
5542455 | Ostermayer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555917 | Quigley | Sep 1996 | A |
5564475 | Wright | Oct 1996 | A |
5641001 | Wilson | Jun 1997 | A |
5651394 | Marchand | Jul 1997 | A |
5709250 | Ward et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
RE35777 | Givin | Apr 1998 | E |
5746257 | Fry | May 1998 | A |
5826627 | Seabrook et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5857498 | Barreto et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5881764 | Ward | Mar 1999 | A |
5894867 | Ward et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899240 | Wilson | May 1999 | A |
5937914 | Wilson | Aug 1999 | A |
5967195 | Ward | Oct 1999 | A |
5983953 | Wilson | Nov 1999 | A |
6073661 | Wilson | Jun 2000 | A |
6112774 | Wilson | Sep 2000 | A |
6123116 | Ward et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6145550 | Ward | Nov 2000 | A |
6148869 | Quigley | Nov 2000 | A |
6158478 | Lee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179965 | Cunnane et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202705 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207598 | Lee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227255 | Osterberg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237644 | Hay et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240973 | Stone et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244306 | Troughton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253796 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276402 | Herring | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6379506 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6581645 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585006 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6837277 | Troughton et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6896009 | Ward | May 2005 | B2 |
6959737 | Ward | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7001489 | Taipale et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7059357 | Ward | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7059361 | Hansson | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7124781 | Fahrer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7195040 | Ward | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7426943 | Ueda et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20030010393 | Kuji | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040079434 | Martin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102118 | Hay et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040182464 | Ward | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050121097 | Ward | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060185753 | Ward | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070157987 | Ward | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
454 092 | Dec 1927 | DE |
3318960 | Nov 1984 | DE |
33 29 740 | Mar 1985 | DE |
0 048 962 | Sep 1981 | EP |
0 158 710 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0 185 177 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 224 276 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0 264 881 | Oct 1987 | EP |
0 269 070 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0 284 575 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0 283 181 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 350 673 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 408 849 | May 1990 | EP |
0 408 849 | May 1990 | EP |
0 672 782 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 794 283 | Sep 1997 | EP |
1 693 506 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2 597 123 | Apr 1986 | FR |
2157328 | Oct 1985 | GB |
2245006 | Feb 1991 | GB |
8-158285 | Dec 1994 | JP |
WO 8600099 | Jan 1986 | WO |
WO 8909848 | Apr 1989 | WO |
WO 9961698 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0200096 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03010304 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03093573 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080223474 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |