WASTEWATER FOAM CONTROL AGENT

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230391644
  • Publication Number
    20230391644
  • Date Filed
    October 21, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    December 07, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A foam control agent and method of controlling foam for wastewater treatment by use of a foam control agent, wherein the agent comprises at least a branched alcohol.
Description

Embodiments relate to a foam control agent and method of controlling foam in waste water treatment, wherein the agent comprises at least a branched alcohol.


INTRODUCTION

Foam in wastewater treatment plants can occur at many stages. Aeration tanks, secondary clarifiers, and the anaerobic digesters all commonly face issues with foam. This foam can take up valuable volume in the processing tanks, etc. as well as potentially spilling over creating safety and cleanup concerns.


The foam is typically generated in one of two ways, surface active agents in the wastewater or biological activity. Surface agents can be simple household detergents and cleaners, industrial surfactants or polymers, grease and oil, or a variety of other possible sources. Biological foam can be created by byproducts from microbial activity such as proteins, polysaccharide and from wastewater organisms themselves such as Nocardia.


For all these reasons and more, there is a need for a foam control agent and method of controlling foam in wastewater.


SUMMARY

Embodiments relate to a foam control agent and method of controlling foam for wastewater treatment, wherein the agent comprises at least a branched alcohol. This organic defoamer can also boost performance of silicone defoamers.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments are disclosed in the following detailed description and accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1 is a diagram of pump test components





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure relates to a foam control agent for wastewater treatment. The present disclosure details how, unexpectedly, branched alcohols have been shown to have superior foam control performance. The branched alcohols may be 2-alkyl-1-alkanols (also known as Guerbet alcohols), and preferably 2-ethylhexanol (2-EH) and 2-propylheptanol (2-PH). These alcohols can be synthesized via the aldol condensation of the corresponding aldehydes or from the Guerbet reaction of primary linear alcohols. Other methods of production may also be utilized.


In this invention, C9 to C12 β-branched alcohols (C9-C12 Guerbet alcohols) were found to be surprisingly effective in reducing the foam during the various stages of wastewater treatment. Another benefit to the branched alcohols is their very good biodegradability.


The generic structure of the antifoaming agent currently disclosed is as follows:




embedded image


wherein x is an integer from 2 to 8 and R is an alkyl group with 1-8 carbon atoms.


The foam control agent may also be described as comprising a 2-alkyl substituted alcohol from C9-C12. The alcohols can be predominately one isomer (>95 wt. %) or a mixture of alcohols which can be generated by an aldol condensation of a mixture of aldehydes or generated from a mixture of alcohols via the Guerbet reaction.


The C8-C32 Guerbet alcohols including 2-ethylhexanol, 2-butyl-1-octanol, and 2-propylheptanol and the mixture of C8, C9, and C10 alcohols generated from the aldol condensation of butyraldehyde and valeraldehyde are preferred in some embodiments.


The concentration of the Guerbet alcohol in the formulated foam control agent ranges from 0.01% to 100%, preferably, ranging from 25% to 100% when used as antifoaming agent or as a defoaming agent. The Guerbet alcohol can be in the form of a solid or liquid, a liquid is preferred. If it is a solid, the material may be dissolved or dispersed in a solvent. The said foam control agent can be aqueous solution or organic solvent-based solution. The usage dosage of the said foam control agent for wastewater treatment varies from 0.01% to 5%, preferably, ranges from 0.1% to 1% (50-100 ppm).


Other foam control agents (e.g., copolymers composed of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and/or butylene oxide, random or blocks) or other hydrophobic materials such as waxes, oils or silicas may also be added with the branched, Guerbet alcohol(s). Silicone can be used in conjunction with the 2-alkyl alcohols. Surfactants, especially alkoxylates of the alcohols can also be used. The use of branched alcohols as foam control agents may be water based or oil based.


The new foam control agent presently disclosed may be in the form of a solid or liquid. If it is a solid, the material may be dissolved or dispersed in a solvent before use as a foam control agent. The presently disclosed agents are believed to work in the presence of all commonly used industrial cleaners.


The chemical agent can be used both in antifoamer or defoamer formulations. Antifoamer formulations are obtained by the mixture of polyglycols, esters, silicones, solvents, water and other chemicals that in the gas-liquid interface of the bubble avoiding the foam formation. Other amphiphilic chemicals based on block copolymer can be used as well. In defoaming formulations, in addition to the products mentioned above, it can be used vegetal oils, mineral oils, waxes and other oily agents.


The optional surfactant or emulsifier contained in the foam control agent is selected to be suitable for improving the compatibility of the foam control agent on the feedstock or forming an emulsion with the composition of branched alcohol. The optional surfactant or emulsifier has an amount ranging from 0.1-30% by weight of the composition of branched alcohol.


The optional surfactant or emulsifier may be anionic, cationic or nonionic. Examples of suitable anionic surfactants or emulsifiers are alkali metal, ammonium and amine soaps; the fatty acid part of such soaps contains preferably at least 10 carbon atoms. The soaps can also be formed “in situ;” in other words, a fatty acid can be added to the oil phase and an alkaline material to the aqueous phase.


Other examples of suitable anionic surfactants or emulsifiers are alkali metal salts of alkyl-aryl sulfonic acids, sodium dialkyl sulfosuccinate, sulfated or sulfonated oils, e.g., sulfated castor oil; sulfonated tallow, and alkali salts of short chain petroleum sulfonic acids.


Suitable cationic surfactants or emulsifiers are salts of long chain primary, secondary or tertiary amines, such as oleylamide acetate, cetylamine acetate, di-dodecylamine lactate, the acetate of aminoethyl-aminoethyl stearamide, dilauroyl triethylene tetramine diacetate, 1-aminoethyl-2-heptadecenyl imidazoline acetate; and quaternary salts, such as cetylpyridinium bromide, hexadecyl ethyl morpholinium chloride, and diethyl di-dodecyl ammonium chloride.


Examples of suitable nonionic surfactants or emulsifiers are condensation products of higher fatty alcohols with ethylene oxide, such as the reaction product of oleyl alcohol with 10 ethylene oxide units; condensation products of alkylphenols with ethylene oxide, such as the reaction product of isoctylphenol with 12 ethylene oxide units; condensation products of higher fatty acid amides with 5, or more, ethylene oxide units; polyethylene glycol esters of long chain fatty acids, such as tetraethylene glycol monopalmitate, hexaethyleneglycol monolaurate, nonaethyleneglycol monostearate, nonaethyleneglycol dioleate, tridecaethyleneglycol monoarachidate, tricosaethyleneglycol monobehenate, tricosaethyleneglycol dibehenate, polyhydric alcohol partial higher fatty acid esters such as sorbitan tristearate, ethylene oxide condensation products of polyhydric alcohol partial higher fatty acid esters, and their inner anhydrides (mannitol-anhydride, called Mannitan, and sorbitol-anhydride, called Sorbitan), such as glycerol monopalmitate reacted with 10 molecules of ethylene oxide, pentaerythritol monooleate reacted with 12 molecules of ethylene oxide, sorbitan monostearate reacted with 10-15 molecules of ethylene oxide, mannitan monopalmitate reacted with 10-15 molecules of ethylene oxide; long chain polyglycols in which one hydroxyl group is esterified with a higher fatty acid and other hydroxyl group is etherified with a low molecular alcohol, such as methoxypolyethylene glycol 550 monostearate (550 meaning the average molecular weight of the polyglycol ether). A combination of two or more of these surfactants may be used; e.g., a cationic may be blended with a nonionic or an anionic with a nonionic.


The foam control agent may further comprise one or more additives. Examples of additives include ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymers, butylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymers, ethylene oxide/butylene oxide block copolymers, waxes, or silicone-based materials. For other wastewater treatment applications where surfactants cause foaming in the treatment steps, higher 2-alkyl substituted alcohols up to C32 can be used.


EXAMPLES

An experiment to test the efficacy of the presently disclosed foam control agent and others may be conducted as follows.


Materials









TABLE 1







Raw Materials










Name
Producer/Vendor
Function
Chemistry and function





2-ethylhexanol
Purchased from
Novel Foam Control



(2-EH)
Sigma Aldrich
Agent



2-Propylheptanol
Purchased from
Novel Foam Control



(2-PH)
Sigma Aldrich
Agent



Xiameter ACP-
Dow Chemical
Comparative example
Silicone based foam control agent


1400 Antifoam

benchmark



Compound








Propylene Glycol
Purchased from Sigma Aldrich
Diluent for silicone compounds


embedded image







Triton X-100
Dow Chemical
Foam medium for test
















TABLE 2







Test Formulations













Foam control
Test


Foaming


Examples
Agent
Method
Amount
Actives Concentration
Medium





Example 1
2-Propylheptanol
Pump
2 ml
2500 ppm
1% Triton




Test


X-100


Example 2
2-Propylheptanol
Pump
4 ml
5000 ppm
1% Triton




Test


X-100


Example 3
2-Propylheptanol
Pump
50 uL 2-
10 ppm ACP 1400 +
1% Triton



and ACP-1400
Test
Propylheptanol
62.5 ppm 2PH
X-100





8 uL







ACP-1400







792 uL







propylene







glycol




Example 4
2-Propylheptanol
Shake
100 μl
1000 ppm
1% Triton




Test


X-100


Example 5
2-Propylheptanol
Shake
50 uL 2-
20 ppm ACP 1400 +
1% Triton



and ACP-1400
Test
Propylheptanol
500 ppm 2PH
X-100





0.002 g







ACP-1400







0.498 g







propylene







glycol




Example 6
2-Propylheptanol
Shake
100 uL 2-
20 ppm ACP 1400 +
1% Triton



and ACP-1400
Test
Propylheptanol
1000 ppm 2PH
X-100





0.002 g







ACP-1400







0.498 g







propylene







glycol




Example 7
Ethylhexanol
Shake
500 uL
5000 ppm EH
1% Triton




Test
Ethylhexanol

X-100


Example 8
Ethylhexanol and
Shake
100 uL 2-
50 ppm ACP 1400 +
1% Triton



ACP-1400
Test
Propylheptanol
1000 ppm EH
X-100





0.005 g







ACP-1400







0.495 g







propylene







glycol




Comparative
ACP 1400
Pump
8 uL
10 ppm
1% Triton


Example 1

Test
ACP-1400

X-100





792 uL







propylene







glycol




Comparative
ACP 1400
Shake
0.002 g
20 ppm
1% Triton


Example 2

Test
ACP-1400

X-100





0.498 g







propylene







glycol




Comparative
ACP 1400
Shake
0.005 g
50 ppm
1% Triton


Example 3

Test
ACP-1400

X-100





0.495 g







propylene







glycol









Testing Methodology
Pump Test

To test the foam control performance, a pump test was utilized. The pump test is composed of three components: a 2 L clear jacketed glass open top glass column with a valve at the bottom. A cell heater recirculating silicone fluid through the jacket to maintain temperature. A centrifugal pump with the inlet attached to the bottom valve of the column and the outlet going into the top of the open glass column to recirculate the foaming medium. FIG. 1 is a diagram of the pump test components.


For this test, the foaming medium was carefully poured into the 2 L glass column that had been preheated to 25C. The antifoaming agent(s) were then prepared by mixing 0.2 grams of silicone antifoam with 49.8 grams of propylene glycol (mixed via shaking in a bottle). Propylheptanol and ethyl hexanol were used neat in this test and all the antifoaming agents were loaded into micropipettes.


The recirculating pump was then turned on and the foam generated by the pump monitored until it the foam reaches a height of 1700 mL in the column. At this point the antifoam was injected directly into the recycle stream. In the examples where a combination of alcohol and silicone were utilized, both were injected simultaneously using two micropipettes into the recycle stream. The Foam Volume was then monitored until foam returns to the maximum 1700 mL level or ten minutes have passed, whichever comes first.


Shake Test

To further test the foam control performance, a shake test was conducted. For this test, a Burrell WRIST-ACTION Model AA, equipped with a suitable clamp to accommodate an 8 oz (240 mL) French Square bottle was utilized (Burrell Corp., Pittsburgh, PA, Cat. No. 75-755-04). The shaker arm measured 5¼+/− 1/16 in. (13.34+/−0.16 cm). This is measured from the center of the shaker shaft to the center of the bottle. The shaker arm was horizontal in the rest position to hold the bottle in a vertical position. The shaking arc was around 16 degrees and the shaking frequency was around 350 strokes per minute.


For this test, the following steps took place. First, 100 mL of the foaming medium(s) were poured into 8 oz French Square bottle. For the samples which utilized a silicone antifoam compound, these samples were diluted using propylene glycol. For a 20 PPM test, 0.2 grams of silicone compound was combined with 49.8 grams of propylene glycol and mixed thoroughly by shaking. For a 50 PPM test, 0.5 grams of silicone compound was mixed with 49.5 grams of propylene glycol and mixed thoroughly by shaking.


0.5 grams of the silicone compound and propylene glycol mixture were then added to the surface of 1% Triton X-100 solution (in the bottle). The required amount of propylheptanol or ethyl hexanol (when used) was then directly added to the surface of the solution (in the bottle). The French bottle was then capped and placed in the clamp on the shaker arm for agitation/mixing. The shaker was then turned on for 30 seconds and after shaking stops, a time until foam collapses (when the foam height has fallen to 0.5 cm or below over the majority of the surface) was recorded.


Results

Foam control performance for the foam control agents are shown in Tables 3-4. As shown in Tables 3-4, 0.25% (2500 ppm) 2-PH and 0.5% (5000 ppm) 2-PH in 1% Triton X-100 provide a significant improvement in foam knock down compared to the silicone-based foam control agent 1400 in propylene glycol. The 2-PH alcohol also presents good persistence performance The addition of 2-PH to the silicone antifoamers also results in improved knockdown compared with the silicone-based foam control agent in propylene glycol.









TABLE 1







Experimental results for pump test in 1% Triton X-100














Example 3
Comparative



Example 1
Example 2
62.5 PPM
Example 1



2500 PPM
5000 PPM
2PH + 10 PPM
10 PPM


Examples
2PH
2PH
ACP 1400
ACP 1400


Name
Foam
Foam
Foam
Foam


Time
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume


(seconds)
(mL)
(mL)
(mL)
(mL)














0
1000
1000
1000
1000


5
840
540
600
800


10
660
360
660
880


15
620
340
720
920


20
600
320
760
960


25
620
340
800
1040


30
620
340
900
1040


35
640
340
1000
1020


40
680
340
1100
1020


45
720
340
1200
1040


50
760
340

1100


55
780
340

1100


60
780
340

1140


70
800
340

1180


80
840
340

1200


90
880
340




100
940
340




110
960
340




120
1000
340




130
1080
340




140

340




150

340




160

340




170

340




180

340




190

340




200

340




210

340




220

340




230

340




240

340




250

340




260

340




270

340




280

340




290

340




300

340




310

340




320

340




330

340




340

340




350

340




360

340




370

340




380

340




390

340




400

340




410

340




420

340




430

340




440

340




450

340




460

340




470

340




480

340




490

340




500

340




510

340




520

340




530

340




540

340




550

340




560

340




570

340




580

340




590

340




600

340
















TABLE 4







Experimental results for shake test in 1% Triton X-100









Examples




















Comparative
Comparative



Example 4
Example 5
Example 6
Example 7
Example 8
Example 2
Example 3









Name
















20 PPM ACP
20 PPM ACP

50 PPM ACP





1000 PPM
1400 + 500 PPM
1400 + 1000 PPM
5000 PPM
1400 + 1000 PPM
20 PPM
50 PPM



2 PH
2 PH
2 PH
EH
EH
ACP 1400
ACP 1400



Collapse
Collapse
Collapse
Collapse
Collapse
Collapse
Collapse


Cycle
Time (s)
Time (s)
Time (s)
Time (s)
Time (s)
Time (s)
Time (s)

















1
23.57
5.66
7.94
6.95
3.84
17.39
15.03


2
300
26.73
22.64
300
17.72
29.61
20.98


3

28.47
30.05

22.81
41.16
21.88


4

45.66
40.82

31.16
66.11
31.3


5

39.24
35.51

23.65
76.76
37.19


6

31.14
33.64

29.46
132.89
52.21


7

51.15
32.64

36.4
300
73.74


8

40.39
39.61

36.16

190.23


9

54.84
42.41

41.34

300


10

80.73
39.02

48.34


11

300
46.19

53.85


12


58.54

65.87


13


73.08

85.14


14


111.24

300








Claims
  • 1. (canceled)
  • 2. (canceled)
  • 3. (canceled)
  • 4. (canceled)
  • 5. A method of controlling foam for wastewater treatment by use of a foam control agent, wherein the agent comprises at least a branched alcohol that has the structure of:
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one other foam control agent or hydrophobic material is added.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein a silicone is also added.
  • 8. (canceled)
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2021/055935 10/21/2021 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63105381 Oct 2020 US