This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 20165319.3 filed Mar. 24, 2020, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a striking mechanism for a watch. Said mechanism is capable of generating one or more sounds to signal an alarm or minute repeaters.
In mechanical watches provided with a minute repeater system, said system conventionally comprises one or more gongs each consisting of a metal wire generally circular in shape and placed in a plane parallel to the dial of the watch. The metal wire of each gong is generally disposed around the watch movement, in the watch frame and above a plate on which the different parts of the movement are mounted. One end or several ends of each gong are attached, for example by soldering, to a gong-carrier integral with the plate, for example, which may be unique for all the gongs. The other end of each gong can be generally free.
The striking mechanism comprises at least one hammer actuated at the request of the user, to indicate the time by a series of hammer impact noises on the gong. Each hammer is provided with a return spring allowing it to fall back onto the gongs. The energy reserve for a series of strikes comes from a spring-barrel, which is recharged regularly by the user. This type of mechanism is quite complex and bulky and the energy of the impacts is limited and often decreasing with the mechanical unloading of the spring, the interval between the impacts is also dependent on the unloading of the spring. The autonomy of the spring-barrel is ultimately limited, and it often has to be reset after the alarm or audible indication has ended.
Electronic watches of the quartz or other type are also known, provided with a striking system and/or minute repeaters, wherein a piezoelectric actuator acts as a loudspeaker. The striking takes place using an integrated circuit connected to the actuator. The loudspeaker produces a series of sounds for an alarm, or to indicate the time at the user's request. It is clear that this system is less complex and that the autonomy of this type of striking, as well as the volumes are greater than in the case of a mechanical watch. However, the sound produced by this mechanism is synthetic and unattractive compared to the natural sound of a mechanical gong. In addition, in the limited spatial volume of a watch, it is difficult to implement a loudspeaker that is able to reproduce a sound that approximates the sound of mechanical gong.
Patent application FR 1 335 311 A describes a striking mechanism for a timepiece. This mechanism is composed of a gong disposed at least in part around the movement and an electromechanical device comprising at least one hammer to strike the gong by activating a coil mounted on a metal axial rod. The hammer activation is provided by an electric drive.
Patent application CH 705 303 A1 describes a timepiece which comprises a sound mechanism, which comprises a striking mechanism in a sealed part of the case and at least one gong to be activated by the striking mechanism. The hammer is electrically activated to strike the gong.
Patent application FR 2 061 680 A1 describes an electric hour striking mechanism for a timepiece. The mechanism comprises an electromagnet, which is powered by pulses and which acts on a timepiece hammer to strike a bell or a gong.
The purpose of the invention is therefore to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a striking mechanism for a watch, which uses a new principle for the generation of one or more sounds from at least one gong.
To this end, the invention relates to a watch provided with a striking mechanism as well as a method for producing sounds by the mechanism, comprising the features defined in the claims.
A watch according to the invention comprises a striking mechanism, comprising at least one attached gong and at least one hammer, as well as an electric energy accumulator, such as a battery. The mechanism also comprises an integrated circuit powered by the electric energy accumulator and configured to produce current pulses, and an electrodynamic actuator, which is connected to the integrated circuit and which is able to receive said pulses, the actuator being integral with the hammer or connected to the hammer so as to generate in response to said pulses a movement of the hammer from a rest position thereof, said movement being able to produce an impact of the hammer on the gong. The mechanism also comprises a return means, such as a spring connected to the hammer so as to return the hammer to its rest position after the impact.
A watch according to the invention may comprise a basic mechanical or electronic horological movement. In both cases, the watch becomes a hybrid watch which overcomes the disadvantages described above. In the first case, the watch comprises a majority of mechanical components supplemented by an electromechanical striking mechanism, which is more compact and able to increase the autonomy, as well as the energy and the uniformity of the impacts compared to the prior art. In the second case, the watch comprises a majority of electronic and/or electromechanical components, as well as a gong which generates a natural sound instead of the synthetic sounds produced by electronic watches of the prior art.
Depending on particular embodiments, the hammer undergoes one or more pre-oscillations before reaching the impact. According to a particular embodiment, the hammer and the gong are provided respectively with attracting magnets.
The invention will be described in more detail below using the appended drawings, given by way of non-limiting examples, wherein:
In
A hammer 15 is rotatably mounted around an axis of rotation 16, so that the hammer can impact the gong 4. The rotation of the hammer 15 is actuable by an electrodynamic actuator 17, which is connected to the integrated circuit 7. The hammer 15 is provided with a spring (not shown) which returns the hammer to its rest position after impact. The actuator 17 receives current pulses generated by the integrated circuit 7, based on the position detected by the detectors 8 and 9, so as to announce the time at the user's request, by a series of specific sounds. Preferably, a second gong 4′ and a second hammer provided with its electromechanical actuator (not shown) are present to generate distinct sounds. The dimensions of the actuator 17 and of the hammer 15 are shown only as an indication, but it is clear that all of these components will occupy only a fraction of the space occupied by a purely mechanical striking mechanism, which generally occupies the entire surface of the dial.
Advantageously, a watch according to the invention combines one or more mechanical gongs with a hammer actuated by an electrodynamic actuator. Compared to purely mechanical watches, this solution allows to have a much greater autonomy, a higher sound intensity, an improved repeatability of the pulses, a constant interval between the pulses, as well as a spatial occupation of the striking system which is much less than mechanical striking-systems. In an electronic watch, the invention allows to implement a natural sound for alarms and/or minute repeaters.
The volume of impact noises depends on the performance of the electrodynamic actuator used. Tests using an existing electrodynamic vibrator have been made. As can be seen below, the finding is that the energy of a single impact is comparable, but still less than the energy of the impact of a mechanical actuator. However, particular embodiments of the invention are related to the way wherein the current pulses sent to the actuator 17 are configured relative to the rest position of the hammer 15, and relative to a number of parameters of the striking mechanism. A block diagram of the mechanism is shown in
It should be noted that the return means 27 can also be a mechanical cam, or else an electromagnetic force, or another means.
The magnitude of the electromechanical force Fem applied by the pulse is such that the force actuates an oscillation 30 of amplitude 2x0. This oscillation is illustrated by curve 30 until the moment of impact ti. If the gong was not present, the oscillation would follow the dotted curve. The time between t=0 and the maximum of the dotted curve corresponds to
with τ=1/f0. It can be seen that in the embodiment shown, the duration of the pulse 31 is such that the impact takes place approximately when the speed of the hammer is at its maximum. This implies that the duration of the pulse is approximately
The law of conservation of energy allows to relate the work of the force Fem, on the path x0 to the kinetic energy Ecin received by the actuator. The electrical balance is also evaluated. It can be shown that the kinetic energy of the impact and the consumed electrical energy are respectively
with R the electrical resistance (Ohm), and ku the coil-magnet coupling factor (N/A).
As illustrated in
k=1606 N/m, x0=0.19 mm, R=80 Ohm, m=2.68 gr, ku=2.07 [N/A], U=9 V=>I=U/R=112.5 mA, =>Fem=ku*I=0.233 N.
With these parameters, the kinetic energy of the impact achieved by the prototype according to the embodiment of
According to another embodiment, the impact energy generated by an electromechanical force equal to or less than the force Fem applied for the previous case which uses a single pulse, is increased by actuating the hammer in a different manner, illustrated for example in
By reasoning in a similar way as before, we obtain this time for the energies:
by a second negative pulse 41 of magnitude Fem, so that a second pre-oscillation 44 brings the hammer back to a distance of −3x0 from the rest position. At the extreme point at −3x0 (at which the distance between the hammer and the gong is 4 times x0), at t=τ, a third positive pulse 42 of magnitude Fem generates the final oscillation 45 which throws the hammer towards the gong until the moment of impact ti happening at
The energies are given in this case by the following expressions:
The following table groups together the theoretical performances evaluated in the 2 previous sections:
The right column expresses the multiplicative factor to be applied to the power consumption of the mode in question, to reach the same kinetic energy as with 3 pulses (
Ecin (1 pul) requires 8.5×greater force EM to reach Ecin (3 pul). However, the consumption will be 8.5{circumflex over ( )}2=72× greater. But as the consumption ratio is 1.75/0.5=3.5, 8.5{circumflex over ( )}2/3.5=20.6× is finally obtained.
The significant energy gain is clearly seen by applying 1 or 2 pre-oscillations, instead of a single direct pulse. For example, the consumption would increase by a factor of 20.6/2.5=8× in the case where it is sought to obtain the same kinetic energy with a single pulse, as with 2 pulses.
The following table is a numerical application of the 6 formulas above, with the data of the prototype in
It is clear that the 50 μJ energy of the mechanical striking-work is greatly exceeded with 2 or 3 pulses.
Since in reality, the simplifications mentioned above are only approximate (for example the friction and the induced voltage are not zero, the frequency is not exactly f0), the embodiments which include at least one pre-oscillation can be formulated as follows: the hammer is actuated so that it undergoes at least two oscillations before reaching the impact, at least one of which is designated ‘pre-oscillation’, the pre-oscillation(s) being followed by a final oscillation which leads to the impact. In this context, the term ‘oscillation’ refers to the movement between two consecutive extreme positions of a vibration undergone by the hammer. The oscillations are generated by a series of pulses of opposite signs, so that from the second pulse, each pulse is applied approximately when the hammer reaches an extreme point of the oscillation generated by the previous pulse. In general, the magnitudes of the pulses that generate the pre-oscillations are equal to or less than the magnitude of the pulse that generates the final oscillation.
The number of pre-oscillations can be greater than two, provided that the magnitude of the pulses is adapted to avoid impacts during the pre-oscillations.
By extension to multiple pre-oscillations, it is clear that the applied alternating signal, which is square or otherwise, must have a frequency close to the natural frequency of oscillation of the mass-spring system, so as to effectively amplify the oscillations. This resonance phenomenon is well known to the person skilled in the art.
According to yet another embodiment, the hammer 15 and the gong 4 are provided with attracting magnets, one magnet being fixedly mounted on the gong 4 and the other magnet being fixedly mounted on the hammer 15, so that the magnets are physically contacted at the moment of impact of the hammer on the gong. The force of attraction is such that the hammer and the gong remain in contact while the gong vibrates, until a reverse pulse applied to the electrodynamic actuator causes the hammer to move backward, breaking contact between the magnets. This prolonged contact between the hammer and the gong is able to improve the transfer of kinetic energy from the hammer to the gong. This embodiment can be combined with the methods described above according to which the striking-work is operated without or with pre-oscillations. In the case of several pre-oscillations, their amplitudes must be adjusted to prevent the magnets from sticking the hammer to the gong before the desired moment of impact.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20165319 | Mar 2020 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3440814 | Reimann | Apr 1969 | A |
3689919 | Ganter | Sep 1972 | A |
4444513 | Proellochs | Apr 1984 | A |
20110211427 | Pesenti | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120063275 | Favre | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
705 303 | Jan 2013 | CH |
1 335 311 | Aug 1963 | FR |
2 061 680 | Jun 1971 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Buttet, Translation of CH705303, Jan. 31, 2013. |
European Search Report of EP 20 16 5319 dated Sep. 15, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210311437 A1 | Oct 2021 | US |