Patent Grant
10647886
A water-based hydrogel coating for natural rubber or synthetic rubber articles is provided herein and methods of applying said coatings and, in particular, a water-based hydrogel coating blend that comprises a blend of hydrogel and elastomeric materials.
Medical articles, such as gloves and other elastomeric articles, often come into contact with liquids and fluids during their use. Such articles form a barrier between the user's skin and the external environment. Medical gloves, such as examination gloves and surgical gloves are examples of articles used in the healthcare setting, and they play a key role in minimizing the spread of infectious diseases. Such articles are used frequently by health care professionals. Therefore, it is important for medical articles such as gloves to provide an effective barrier, while providing an adequate level of comfort to the user. On the other hand, an uncoated latex article, such as a surgical glove, can have poor lubricity making it difficult for the user to don the glove, e.g., place the glove on a human hand, in both wet donning (e.g., donning the glove when the skin is damp) and dry donning (e.g., donning the glove when the skin is dry). Thus, the application of a coating to these elastomeric articles can be used to provide a smooth and non-tacky inner skin-contacting surface, e.g., to facilitate donning the article to which the coating has been applied. These coated articles also preferably have a coating that does not flake off.
It is known in the art to utilize lubricants or other coatings on rubber and synthetic latex products, such as surgical gloves, condoms, finger cots, catheters, probe covers, ureters, and the like, for enhancing the lubricity of the product when it comes into contact with the skin of the user. One such approach was to utilize lubricants that included powders, such as calcium carbonate and corn starch, applied to the inner skin-contacting surface of a surgical glove to ease donning of the glove. However, powdered lubricants can be unfavorable due to the risk of the powdered lubricant leaking out of the interior of the glove and contaminating the surgical field. Moreover, certain starch powders can be carriers of latex allergens that can cause latex allergies in some users of the gloves.
In other approaches, a lubricant coating is applied to the interior surface of the glove that does not contain a powder. In one instance, a polymeric coating, such as a hydrogel coating, can be applied to the glove. Where a hydrogel coating is applied to the glove, it is often provided in a solvent medium, such as ethanol, to maintain the polymers in solution. The use of a solvent system in a polymer solution is undesirable because the solvent is typically expensive, can create a fire hazard and provides a waste disposal issue making it not environmentally friendly. Moreover, the solvent-based hydrogel polymer solutions tend to have a short pot-life, e.g., of only a few weeks, in which the solution must be used and applied as a coating.
In addition to the formulation of these hydrogel coatings containing unfavorable solvent-based systems, the method of application of these solvent-based systems can provide expensive and onerous steps. In particular, prior to application of the polymeric coating to the surface of the glove, for example, the latex or rubber is heat dried and then further treated with a chemical priming step to prepare the rubber or latex surface for receiving the hydrogel polymer solvent-based coating. The chemical priming step can include dipping the rubber or latex article in an acid solution or other harsh chemical prior to the subsequent dip in the coating solution. Following dipping in acid or other harsh chemical, the article is rinsed to remove any residual acid or chemical. The use of a chemical priming step in a glove coating process provides an additional, undesirable step that is time consuming and expensive. Moreover, the acid or chemical used during the priming step must also be later disposed of, creating an additional waste disposal step and providing an added cost.
After application of the solvent-based hydrogel coating, an additional process step is needed to dispose of the solvent waste. Since the solvent is not environmentally friendly it requires special treatment prior to disposal. Moreover, extra precautions and steps need to be taken to make the process fire-proof to prevent any ignition from the flammable solvents being used with the hydrogel solution.
A need, therefore, exists for a water-based hydrogel coating for elastomeric articles.
A water-based hydrogel coating is provided that facilitates improved lubricity of an elastomeric article coated with the water-based hydrogel coating and, in the case of a glove, improved donning. In particular, a water-based hydrogel blend coating solution is provided that comprises a water-based hydrogel and at least one elastomeric material without requiring a solvent medium. In addition, a method of applying the water-based hydrogel blend coating composition to elastomeric articles is provided having an improved process that does not require an acid priming or other chemical priming step. In one embodiment, the hydrogel blend coating composition can be provided such that at least one of the elastomeric components of the hydrogel blend solution is the same as or similar to the elastomeric material of the final elastomeric article.
A water-based hydrogel coating can be formed by combining a water-based hydrogel with one or more elastomeric materials and, in one aspect, with a blend of two or more elastomeric materials to form a water-based hydrogel blend coating. In one aspect, the elastomeric blend can comprise two or more elastomeric materials and, in one instance can comprise nitrile rubber and another elastomer similar to the base article material. This water-based hydrogel blend can be applied to either natural or synthetic rubber latex materials to result in a final article that is coated on at least one surface with the hydrogel blend coating. The final article that is coated can be any elastomeric article that can benefit from an improved lubricity and, in one aspect, can include, but is not limited to, medical gloves, surgical gloves, examination gloves, industrial gloves, condoms, finger cots, probe covers, catheters, ureters, and the like.
The blended formulation allows for a coating solution having a higher solids content, which is beneficial in improving the lubricity of the final elastomeric article, and that remains adhered to the article despite having high solids content. In contrast, a non-blended formulation cannot retain coating adherence at similarly high solids content, thus, being unable to coat at a high solids content onto an elastomeric article. Higher solids content allows for more coating to be applied per surface area of the glove, which in turn provides an increased lubricity. The final coated elastomeric article, coated with the water-based hydrogel blend disclosed herein, can have an improved lubricity than an article coated with the hydrogel alone and can further facilitate both improved donning of an elastomeric glove article, for example, when the skin is damp (e.g., wet donning) and donning when the skin is dry (e.g., dry donning).
A method of applying the water-based hydrogel blend coating to an elastomeric article can reduce the number of process steps required as compared to previous solvent-based coating processes. In particular, an acid or other chemical priming step prior to application of the hydrogel blend coating is not required. In one aspect, an elastomeric glove material can be coated in a process with the hydrogel blend coating disclosed herein. The glove material can be made by conventional glove forming processes, such as coagulant dipping. After a glove former is dipped into the latex material, it can be dried and dipped again into the hydrogel blend coating, without requiring an acid priming step or other chemical priming step. In another aspect, gloves can be provided with the coating material for improved wet and dry donning of the glove and further provided with a textured surface for improved grippability of the glove while in use.
The water-based hydrogel blend is advantageous because it is solvent-free, which can avoid some of the flammability issues associated with using a solvent-based hydrogel in a manufacturing facility. In addition, there is less material waste and disposal due to the water-based formulation compared to the solvent-based formulation, making the water-based formulation more environmentally friendly. The solvent-based formulation requires disposal of the hazardous solvent material which adds cost, processing time and is not friendly to the environment. Moreover, the shelf-life of the water-based hydrogel blend is increased compared to the solvent-based hydrogel system such that the water-based hydrogel blend formulation can be stored for a longer period of time prior to use.
It is further advantageous to coat an elastomeric article with the water-based hydrogel blend in comparison to coating with only the hydrogel coating alone. The hydrogel blend mixture has improved mechanical and thermal stability compared to the hydrogel coating mixture alone. In addition, the hydrogel blend has superior adhesion to the elastomeric substrate compared to the hydrogel coating alone. Application of the hydrogel only to the elastomeric article as the coating can pose some technical challenges. One of the challenges is that a hydrogel only coating on an elastomeric article can delaminate from the elastomeric article substrate. To overcome the issue of delamination, the surface of the elastomeric article can be primed with harsh chemicals; however, this can cause the deterioration of physical properties of the elastomeric article itself. Another approach to overcome delamination can be to coat the elastomeric article with a low total solid of the coating solution; however, a low total solid can reduce the coating performance which in turn can result in a poor dry or wet lubricity. Another approach can be to modify the hydrogel only material by inclusion of polymer lattices.
In one aspect, an elastomeric glove can be formed and then coated with the water-based hydrogel blend disclosed herein. The glove, in one embodiment, can be formed from natural rubber latex and then dipped into the hydrogel blend comprising the hydrogel, natural rubber and a second elastomeric article, such as nitrile latex. The amount of natural rubber in the blend can be greater than the amount of nitrile latex in the blend. In another aspect, the amount of natural rubber latex can be the same as the nitrile latex in the blend. In yet another aspect, the amount of nitrile in the blend can be greater than the natural rubber.
In another embodiment, the glove can be formed from a synthetic rubber latex and then coated in a hydrogel blend comprising the hydrogel, synthetic rubber and a second elastomeric article. The glove, in one embodiment, can be formed from synthetic rubber latex and then dipped into the hydrogel blend comprising the hydrogel, synthetic rubber and a second elastomeric article, such as nitrile latex. The amount of synthetic rubber in the blend can be greater than the amount of nitrile latex in the blend. In another aspect, the amount of synthetic rubber latex can be the same as the nitrile latex in the blend. In yet another aspect, the amount of nitrile in the blend can be greater than the synthetic rubber. In a preferred embodiment, the synthetic rubber of the article and the blend is polyisoprene. In yet another embodiment, at least one of the elastomeric materials present in the hydrogel blend can be the same as the elastomeric material used in the elastomeric article.
An aqueous polymer blend composition for application as a coating to elastomeric articles and a method of applying the coating to the elastomeric articles are described herein and provided in
The polymer blend composition includes a water-based hydrogel polymer. The hydrogel polymer can be a hydrophilic polymer. The hydrogel can also be an acrylic polymer. In one embodiment, it can be a synthetic acrylic polymer. The hydrogel polymer can comprise any that are known in the art and, in one aspect, can be a water-based hydrogel polymer as provided by Nobel Synthetic Polymer Sdn. Bhd., from Selangor, Malaysia. In one aspect, the hydrogel polymer can comprise greater than about 15% synthetic acrylic polymer, less than about 5% additives and the remaining amount made up of water. The acrylic polymer can be any known in the art. The amount of hydrogel provided in the final hydrogel blend composition can comprise a majority of the hydrogel in comparison to the at least one or more elastomeric materials.
The elastomeric materials provided in the polymer blend composition can be any that are typically used in the production of elastomeric articles, and can include natural rubber and/or synthetic elastomers. Natural rubber that can be used includes rubber made from hevea rubber latex and guayule rubber latex, and any other natural rubbers known in the art. Synthetic rubber elastomers which can be used, include polyisoprene, polychloroprene, polyurethane, polybutadiene, nitrile, styrene butadiene rubber, block copolymers of styrene and butadiene, block copolymers of styrene and isoprene, mixtures of these elastomers and vinyl, and the like. Other synthetic rubbers that can be used include acrylic diene block copolymers, acrylic rubber, butyl rubber, EPDM rubber, chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber and fluororubber. In one aspect, at least one of the elastomeric materials can be chosen such that it is the same material or similar to the base material of the elastomeric article. For example, if the elastomeric article is a glove made from natural rubber then the hydrogel blend can comprise at least the hydrogel and natural rubber in the coating composition. In another instance, if a glove material is made from synthetic polyisoprene latex material, then the hydrogel blend composition can include hydrogel and at least synthetic polyisoprene as the elastomeric component, and so on. In another instance, the elastomeric material can be different from the elastomeric article. For instance, a natural rubber elastomeric article, the hydrogel blend can include hydrogel and at least one synthetic rubber elastomer.
In one embodiment, the hydrogel blend composition can comprise the hydrogel mixed with a first elastomeric material that corresponds to the same material as the base material of the final article, and optionally a second elastomeric material that is different from the first. Thus, in one aspect, where the elastomeric article is made from natural rubber, the hydrogel blend component can comprise a first elastomeric material that is natural rubber and a second elastomeric material that is nitrile, for example, or another elastomeric polymer different from the first. In another embodiment, where the elastomeric article is a natural rubber glove, the hydrogel blend composition can contain natural rubber latex as one of the elastomeric materials and, in one example, can contain natural rubber latex in an amount of up to about 37 phr. In another aspect, the natural rubber latex can be included in the blend at an amount of about 12.5 to about 37 phr, and in particular, can be 19 phr. The second elastomeric material in the hydrogel blend can comprise, for example, a nitrile latex. The nitrile latex can be included in an amount of up to about 25 phr. In another instance, the nitrile latex can be included in the blend at an amount of about 0.5 to 25 phr, and, in particular, in an amount of about 6 phr. Where the nitrile latex can have bound acrylonitrile content of about 28%.
In another embodiment, where the elastomeric article is a glove made from synthetic rubber, specifically such as from polyisoprene, the hydrogel blend can comprise an elastomeric material that is similar to the base glove material, i.e., polyisoprene. The polyisoprene or other synthetic rubber in the blend can be included at levels up to about 15 phr and, in particular, in amounts of about 7.5 phr. In one aspect, the polyisoprene can be in the amount of about 4 to 11 phr. In addition, the polyisoprene blend can also include a second elastomeric material in the coating solution and, in one example; the second elastomer can be nitrile. The nitrile latex can be included in an amount up to about 15 phr and, in particular, in an amount of about 7.5 phr. In one aspect, the nitrile can be include in the amount of about 4 to about 11 phr. The nitrile latex can have bound acrylonitrile content of about 28%.
Without being bound by theory, it is believed that by introducing at least one additional elastomeric material to the blend already comprising the first elastomeric material corresponding to the base material, that this additional elastomeric component can disrupt the continuous film property of the water-based hydrogel coating, and can further provide interstices and an irregular domains for upholding lubricant loading and reducing contact surface with the skin of the user, hence dry and damp donning of the final coated article can be achieved, increasing lubricity. In effect, the first elastomeric material similar to the base material of the article can provide adhesion of the hydrogel coating to the article while the addition of the at least second elastomeric material, different from the first, can disrupt the continuous flow of the coating and thus result in a unique morphology on the surface that is not flat but provides some peaks and valleys which can improve donnability. The hydrogel blend coating can also reduce the stickiness when the glove is pressed flat for packaging, such that the two inner coated surfaces of the same glove come into contact and do not stick together as much as a glove coated with the hydrogel only coating. Where only one elastomeric material is provided with the hydrogel, the coating surface can become rather flat. In contrast, where at least a second elastomeric material is added to the blend this provides for a surface having more interstices and the irregular domains which can result in a textured surface being produced on the coated surface of the glove. The textured surface can reduce the contact surface with skin of the user since only protruding “peaks” of the coating contact the skin of the user, thus improving donning. By including at least one elastomeric material that is similar to the base material of the elastomeric article it is believed that the combination can also provide a chemical affinity necessary to enhance adhesion of the water-based hydrogel blend to the base elastomer article. This can further be beneficial to allow treatment with a higher level of lubricant (such as cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC)). If the coating adhesion is not good, i.e., as in the case of a hydrogel-only coating, the coating will detach from the elastomer surface in particular when treated with a high level of lubricant (e.g., CPC). A higher level of CPC added to the coated glove can also help with improved wet donning of the glove.
In one aspect, where the final elastomeric article to be coated is a glove, such that, for example, the base glove is made from natural rubber, the natural rubber used to make the base glove may be compounded with stabilizers, a crosslinker, a vulcanization activator, a vulcanization accelerator, an antioxidant, an antiozonant and optionally, white or other colored pigments. In another aspect, where the final elastomeric article to be coated is a glove, such that, for example, the base glove is made from synthetic rubber, such as polyisoprene, the polyisoprene used to make the base glove may be compounded with stabilizers, a crosslinker, a vulcanization activator, a vulcanization accelerator, an antioxidant, an antiozonant and optionally, white or other colored pigments.
The water-based hydrogel blend composition can comprise about 50% to about 99% hydrogel, from about 0.5% to about 37% of a first elastomer, and about 0.5% to about 25% of a second elastomer. In one example, the final coating composition can comprise about 75% of the water-based hydrogel in the coating composition with the elastomer blend comprising about 25%. In another embodiment, the hydrogel blend composition can comprise from about 50% to about 99% hydrogel, from about 0.5% to about 37% of natural rubber latex, and about 0.5% to about 25% of nitrile latex. In one embodiment, the hydrogel blend can comprise 75-85% hydrogel, 19% natural rubber, and 6% nitrile. In yet another embodiment, the hydrogel blend can comprise about 12% to about 40% of a first elastomer material with the second elastomer material making up the rest of the coating composition after the hydrogel is incorporated and, in one instance, the first elastomer material can comprise about 12.5% to about 37%. Where only one elastomeric material is blended with the hydrogel, the hydrogel can be provided at a range of about 50% to about 99% hydrogel by weight of the coating solution and the one elastomeric material can be provided from about 5% to about 35%. In another embodiment having a synthetic rubber latex article, such as polyisoprene, the hydrogel blend composition can comprise from about 75% to about 85% of the water-based hydrogel with the elastomer blend comprising about 10% to about 20% of the hydrogel blend composition. In one example, the hydrogel blend is from 75-85% hydrogel and can comprise from about 4% to about 11% of a first elastomer material, such as a polyisoprene latex, and a second elastomer material from about 4% to about 11%, such as of nitrile latex. In another example, the hydrogel blend is from 75-85% hydrogel and can comprise about 7.5% of a first elastomer material, such as polyisoprene, and 7.5% of a second elastomer material, such as nitrile.
The hydrogel blend composition can have a higher total solids content in comparison to the hydrogel alone and, in particular, the hydrogel blend composition can have a total solids content between about 3.0% to about 7%. In one instance, a range of total solids content from 3.5% to about 5% can be provided. In one aspect, a total solids content of about 4% is targeted.
Coating the elastomeric article with only the hydrogel composition alone, having no elastomeric materials added, and results in poor coating adhesion to the elastomeric article. In particular, a hydrogel-only coating can result in a coating that flakes off of the coated elastomeric article and the coating can also become abraded during the chlorination process. Moreover, when the elastomeric article formed is a glove an internal tackiness is noticed. In addition, the total solids content of an all-hydrogel coating, if too high or too low, can lead to poor results such as internal tackiness, poor donning properties, and a “wet” look of the final article. Finally, if a post treatment with a lubricant, such as CPC, is performed to an article coated with a hydrogel-only coating composition, the amount of the lubricant must be reduced significantly so that the powder content can meet the specification for powder-free gloves, otherwise the hydrogel-only coating can detach from the surface of the elastomeric article and form powder particulate.
In contrast, the hydrogel blend coating composition has improved adhesion to the elastomeric article in comparison to the hydrogel-only coating. Moreover, a high solids content of the blend coating can be used without any issues observed in the final article, which is desirable since higher solids content improves the final lubricity of the article. The hydrogel blend coating also can provide a unique coating surface morphology of the coated article which can prevent internal tackiness, facilitates improved donning of the article, such as a glove, and prevents the appearance of a “wet” look of the final article. In addition, the hydrogel blend coating composition can enable a more robust post treatment process, such as treating the coated gloves with a higher amount of lubricant.
The water-based polymer blend composition can have a shelf-life that is much longer than a solvent-based polymer composition. A solvent-based polymer composition used in coating gloves typically has a very short pot-life, which can impose constraints on the process, e.g., requiring almost immediate use of the solvent-based materials once made. In contrast, the water-based polymer blend can be stored for longer periods of time, which allows for longer storage of the composition prior to use. For instance, the pot-life for a solvent-based polymer composition may be from about 3 to about 4 weeks, whereas the pot-life for a water-based polymer blend composition as disclosed herein can be up to about 6 months.
In addition, the water-based polymer blend is safer to manufacture and use in the manufacturing facility because it is free from fire hazards as compared to the solvent-based material. The main component of the solvent-based polymer coatings is a solvent based material, e.g., alcohol, which is easily ignitable. In implementing the water-based polymer blend, no additional capital investments are needed to address safety concerns during operation, which makes the water-based polymer blend coating easier to implement across different manufacturing platforms. Where the solvent-based material can have high disposal costs due to special treatment of the solvent as well as not being environmentally friendly, the water-based polymer blend is much easier and much less costly to handle through existing waste water treatment set-ups in the facilities.
The elastomeric articles that can be coated with the aqueous polymer blend disclosed herein can be any elastomeric articles that may benefit from an improved lubricity to the final product. Examples of elastomeric materials that can be used to make the articles can include, but are not limited to, natural rubber and synthetic rubber latex materials, such as polyisoprene, polychloroprene, polyurethane, polybutadiene, nitrile, block copolymers of styrene and butadiene, block copolymers of styrene and isoprene, and the like. Examples of the final article that results from the elastomeric materials chosen can include gloves, catheters, condoms, probe covers, finger cots, ureters, and the like.
In one aspect, the elastomeric material can be formulated into a glove and, in particular a surgeon's glove or an exam glove. After the glove is formed, it can be dipped into the polymer blend composition to coat at least one surface of the glove. It is preferred to coat at least the inner surface, i.e., skin-contacting surface, of the glove. When the glove is formed on a former or glove mold or mandrel, for example, it is the skin-contacting surface that is exposed or positioned externally on the glove former. Thus, when the glove is dipped into the aqueous solution of the polymer blend, although the exterior surface is being coated, that surface will later become the skin-contacting internal surface after the glove is removed and reversed from the mold.
In another aspect, the elastomeric material can comprise a natural rubber material formulated into a glove by dipping a glove former into the natural rubber latex material and then dipping the natural rubber glove into the polymer blend composition to coat at least one surface of the glove. In yet another aspect, the elastomeric material used for the final product can comprise a synthetic polyisoprene material that is first formed into a glove by dipping the glove former into the polyisoprene latex material and then dipping into the polymer blend coating solution. A similar process can be implemented for any elastomeric material chosen.
In one embodiment, the polymer blend composition can comprise about 75 wt % of the water-based hydrogel, about 19 wt % natural rubber latex and about 6 wt % nitrile latex. In another embodiment, the polymer blend composition can comprise about 75 wt % water-based hydrogel by weight and about equal amounts of the elastomeric materials or about 12.5 wt % of each. In yet another embodiment, the polymer blend composition can comprise about 75 wt % water-based hydrogel, about 6 wt % natural rubber latex and about 19 wt % nitrile latex. In one instance, a polymer blend composition can comprise about 85% hydrogel, 4% polyisoprene, and 11% nitrile. In another instance, a polymer blend composition can comprise about 85% hydrogel, 11% polyisoprene, and 4% nitrile. In another instance, a polymer blend composition can comprise about 85 wt % hydrogel and about 7.5 wt % polyisoprene with about 7.5 wt % nitrile.
Optionally, other ingredients such as surfactants or biocides may be added to the coating composition. Possible surfactants may be anionic and/or non-ionic surfactants, for example, sodium lauryl sulfates and/or ethoxylated nonylphenols. The anionic and/or non-ionic surfactants can help to enhance coating stability in particular when elastomeric materials are added to the coating composition. In one aspect, a non-ionic surfactant such as Igepal CO 630 can be provided or other similar surfactants. In another aspect, an anionic surfactant such as Darvan® WAQ can be provided or other similar surfactants. In one embodiment, a non-ionic and an anionic surfactant are added. A biocide can also optionally be added to the coating solution to control the bioburden level of the coating solution. In one instance, the biocide used can be Biogard, or other similar biocides.
In another optional step, the coated article can include a post-treatment with a lubricant after coating, such as cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). In another aspect, the coated article can further include a post-treatment with an antifoam agent, as well as other lubricants such as silicone, and/or ammonium salts of alkyl phosphates. In one example, an antifoam agent such as ANTIFOAM 1920 can be provided, manufactured by Dow Corning Corporation. In another example a silicone emulsion such as SM2140, manufactured by Momentive Performance Materials, can be provided which includes polydimethylsiloxane, nonoxynol-20 and laureth-23. In yet another example, ammonium salts of alkyl phosphates such as Darvan® L can be provided, manufactured from Vanderbilt Chemicals, LLC.
Turning to
Once the mold is prepared and cleaned, the glove mold can be further prepared by dipping into a coagulant to coat the glove mold prior to dipping into the latex dispersion being used to form the glove, as shown at Step 2, after which the mold is oven dried at Step 3 at a temperature from about 55° C. to about 60° C. for about 5 minutes.
After the mold is prepared, then the mold can be dipped into the elastomeric latex dispersion being used to form that particular glove, as shown in Step 4. The dipped mold is withdrawn from the latex after a predetermined time has elapsed, and a portion of the latex dispersion forms a layer on the mold. The elastomeric glove as disclosed herein can be produced using any conventional manufacturing methods known in the art. In the embodiment of
After dipping the glove mold into the latex dispersion, the coated former can be dried at ambient temperature for about 3 minutes (Step 5), followed by a beading step (Step 6), where beading is a process to roll the latex film to form a band near the cuff area. A pre-cure leaching step may be added following the drying and beading of the dipped glove, as in Step 7, where the leaching temperature is from about 65° C. to about 80° C. and the leaching time is about 240 seconds.
In Step 8, the formed glove, still on the glove mold, is dipped into the water-based hydrogel blend to form a coating on the outer surface of the glove, which will later become the inner skin-contacting surface upon glove removal from the mold. The coating composition has a total solids content of about 3.5% to about 4.8%. The temperature of the coating composition at the dipping step is maintained at about 25° C. to about 35° C. and the dipping time of the formed glove into the coating composition is about 12 seconds. The formed glove can still be wet or partially dry upon dipping into the hydrogel blend coating composition; thus, the glove does not need to be completely dry prior to dipping in the coating solution. Notably missing from the flow diagram in
At Step 11, the glove is then stripped. As the glove is stripped off of the mold it is reversed, such that the coated surface of the glove is now on the interior of the glove, e.g., the glove is removed on an inside-out basis. This allows the coated portion of the glove to come into contact with the skin of the user.
After the gloves are removed a chlorination step may be provided. The gloves of
The dried glove was then loaded into a lubricator (e.g., tumbling washer) for application of a lubrication process. The aqueous lubrication solution comprised of about 0.1090 wt % of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), 0.08 wt % of silicone emulsion, 0.014 wt % of antifoam and 0.48 wt % of ammonium salts of alkyl phosphate. The glove was tumbled in the lubricator and sprayed with about 15 liters of lubrication solution and the glove was tumbled for about 19 minutes. The glove was then removed from the lubricator and dried in a cyclone dryer with a heating cycle of about 28 minutes at about 70° C. and a cool down cycle for about 2 minutes.
Although gloves are described in this embodiment, any elastomeric article appropriate for receiving a hydrogel blend coating can be used instead of a glove. In one aspect, the elastomeric article may comprise finger cots, catheters, condoms, probe covers, and other appropriate elastomeric articles.
Turning to
Once the mold is prepared and cleaned, the glove mold can be further prepared by dipping into a coagulant to coat the glove mold prior to dipping into the latex dispersion being used to form the glove, as shown at Step 2, after which the mold is oven dried at Step 3 at a temperature of about 100° C. for about 20 seconds.
After the mold is prepared, then the mold can be dipped into the elastomeric latex dispersion being used to form that particular glove, as shown in Step 4. The dipped mold is withdrawn from the latex after a predetermined time has elapsed, and a portion of the latex dispersion forms a layer on the mold. The elastomeric glove as disclosed herein can be produced using any conventional manufacturing methods known in the art. In the embodiment of
After dipping the glove mold into the latex dispersion, the coated former can be dried in an oven at a temperature of about 40° C. for about 20 seconds (Step 5), followed by a beading step (Step 6). A pre-cure leaching step may be added following the drying and beading of the dipped glove, as in Step 7, where the leaching temperature is from about 65° C. to about 80° C. and the leaching time is about 60 seconds.
In Step 8, the formed glove, still on the glove mold, is dipped into the water-based hydrogel blend to form a coating on the outer surface of the glove, which will later become the inner skin-contacting surface upon glove removal from the mold. The coating composition has a total solids content of about 3.5% to about 4.8%. The temperature of the coating composition at the dipping step is maintained at about 25° C. to about 35° C. and the dipping time into the composition is about 12 seconds. The formed glove can still be wet or partially dry upon dipping into the hydrogel blend coating composition; thus, the glove does not need to be completely dry prior to dipping in the coating composition. As in the process flow shown in
At Step 11, the coated glove still on the mold is dipped into a slurry. The slurry can comprise, in one aspect, a mixture of a biocide and calcium carbonate. A final drying step is then provided in Step 12, where the coated glove is dried at a temperature of about 50° C. for about 20 seconds.
After the final drying step, the coated glove is stripped off of the glove mold at Step 13. As the glove is stripped off of the mold it is reversed, such that the coated surface of the glove is now on the interior of the glove, e.g., the glove is removed on an inside-out basis. This allows the coated portion of the glove to come into contact with the skin of the user. The removed gloves can be dried once more in a tumbler at a temperature of about 60° C. for about 12 minutes, with a cooling step following for about 8 minutes. After the gloves are removed a chlorination step can be provided, similar to that described in
Another exemplary embodiment can employ the hydrogel blend coating for elastomeric articles by also providing a textured coating or surface to the article being coated. Moreover, the hydrogel blend coated articles, such as a glove, can provide for a tailor-made grip of the glove based on the requirements or preferences of the intended use without compromising donning properties.
In one exemplary aspect, the hydrogel blend coating can be applied to a natural rubber latex article, such as a glove. The hydrogel blend in this aspect can comprise a blend of natural rubber and nitrile added to the hydrogel. The gloves formed with natural rubber can be formed on either a smooth glove mold or a textured glove mold. If gloves are formed using the textured glove mold, this provides the inner surface of the glove, e.g., the mold-contacting surface, with a texture or protrusions on the glove. This mold-contacting surface will later become the outer surface of the glove when it is removed from the former and reversed, thus, providing the outer surface of the glove with an enhanced gripping surface, e.g., a high frictional grip. The gloves may or may not contain a pigment to provide a colored glove, such as, for example a brown colored glove, or the glove can be provided in a white or beige color. In addition, the gloves can have an array of possible thicknesses, as appropriate for its use. For instance, the gloves may be provided with a micro thickness, which in one example can range from about 0.15 mm to about 0.18 mm. In another example, the gloves may be provided with a standard thickness, which in one example may be from about 0.20 mm to about 0.26 mm. In yet another example, the gloves may be provided with a thicker make-up, such as from about 0.30 mm to about 0.37 mm.
In yet another exemplary aspect, the hydrogel blend coating can be applied to a synthetic rubber glove. In one instance it is a polyisoprene glove. In that instance, the hydrogel blend comprises the hydrogel and at least a polyisoprene material and nitrile blended together with the hydrogel to make up the coating composition. Similar to the natural rubber glove above, the polyisoprene gloves can be formed on either a smooth glove mold or a textured glove mold and the gloves may or may not contain a pigment to provide a colored glove, such as, for example a brown colored glove or a white or beige colored glove. Furthermore, the polyisoprene glove can be provided in any thickness appropriate for the use of the glove. The gloves may be provided with a micro thickness, which in one example can range from about 0.15 mm to about 0.18 mm. In another example, the gloves may be provided with a standard thickness, which in one example may be from about 0.20 mm to about 0.26 mm. In yet another example, the gloves may be provided with a thicker make-up, such as from about 0.30 mm to about 0.37 mm.
In the aspect above, where a textured glove having enhanced gripping abilities is desired, to obtain an enhanced grip the gloves may need to be chlorinated with no or low chlorine. The low levels of chlorine helps to maintain and enhance the gripping ability of the final glove product. If a non-coated glove is used, the process of chlorinating the gloves at low chlorine strength will result in poor donnability, since the donning surface (i.e., skin-contacting surface of the glove) is not treated with sufficient chlorine strength. In contrast, a glove treated with the hydrogel blend coating can provide an improved lubricity for donning the glove even with very low or no chlorine. Thus, the coated gloves offer the flexibility to chlorinate the gloves at low chlorine strength and yet maintain the desired grippability of the outer surface of the glove.
The following non-limiting examples illustrate particular embodiments of the coating composition and process for coating as disclosed herein. The examples are not meant to be comprehensive of the entire scope of the coating composition and process for coating.
A hydrogel blend coating formulation is provided according to Table 1 below. In particular, the hydrogel is provided at approximately 75% by weight, natural rubber is provided at about 18.6% by weight and nitrile latex is provided at about 6.2% by weight in the hydrogel blend. Additional surfactants and a biocide are also included. The surfactants are added because of the additional elastomer materials in the coating composition, the surfactant can help to blend the natural rubber and nitrile together in solution and effectively help to stabilize the two elastomers in solution. In comparison, a hydrogel-only solution is also provided. The hydrogel only solution was prepared without surfactants because it did not contain any additional elastomeric materials that it needed to stabilize. In addition, the hydrogel only coating cannot support a high amount of lubricant after coating due to not being able to meet the powder content specification requirement as per ASTM standard 3577; this is shown in more detail in Example 8.
The hydrogel blend coating composition has a total solids content in the range of about 3.5% to about 4.7%, unless otherwise indicated in the below tests. Typically, a total solids content of about 4% is targeted. The hydrogel only composition is at about 3% total solids content, unless otherwise indicated in the below tests.
The coating formulations prepared in Example 1 were each prepared at three different total solids contents; 3%, 3.5%, and 4% and were tested for coating adhesion to a natural rubber substrate. A natural rubber glove was formed using a process similar to that shown in
To test the degree of adhesion of the coating on the substrate, a stretch test is performed after the coating has cured on the glove by stretching and pulling at both the finger portion of the glove and the cuff portion of the glove where the glove is stretched from its rest position to a position that is 100% stretched, and it is then released back to its rest position. Once the coated glove is stretched, the tester can use a finger to rub on the coating of the glove to see if the coating flakes off. The gloves are measured on a scale of 1-3, where 1 is no flaking and 3 is a high degree of flaking.
In addition, SEM (scanning electron microscope) scans are also taken of each sample to show the surface morphology of the coated gloves after being stretched. The glove sample is cut to an appropriate size and shape, as specified per ASTM D412, with a die cut to prepare a test specimen used for the SEM test scan. One method for cutting the glove sample as adopted per the ASTM test specification is the dumbbell test specimen. The test specimen is then stretched with a tensometer to 500% of its original length and held for about one minute before allowing the stretched glove specimen to revert back to its original position.
The coating adhesion tests showed that the hydrogel polymer blend has an improved coating adhesion compared to the hydrogel only coating and the hydrogel blend coating does not flake off of the glove after being stretched. In contrast, the hydrogel only coated glove exhibited a high degree of flaking of the coating off of the final glove product. Test results for the adhesion tests are shown below in Table 2, where Composition A is the hydrogel only coating composition and Composition B is the hydrogel blend coating composition.
After the gloves were stretched and an observation was made of the flaking, a glove coated with Composition A and a glove coated with Composition B were scanned under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to observe the effects of stretching and flaking on the glove.
Another set of coating adhesion tests was performed using coating compositions having differing amounts of elastomeric materials added to the hydrogel. Table 3 below indicates the amounts of the ingredients used in the different compositions tested.
Similar to Example 2, a natural rubber glove was formed and dipped into its respective coating composition. Once the coating was cured onto the glove the stretch tests were performed as described in Example 2 to measure the degree of coating adhesion. Results of the stretch test are shown below in Table 4.
The results of the stretch test show that even at equal amounts of the natural rubber and nitrile latex the coating still exhibits excellent adhesion to the glove. Likewise, at a coating having greater nitrile latex content versus natural rubber latex, the coating adhesion is still excellent. This shows that whether the nitrile latex is present in a greater quantity or the natural rubber latex is present in a greater quantity does not affect the performance and properties of the coating adherence to the glove product; thus, the elastomeric materials can be present in any ratio. In particular, the glove base material was a natural rubber latex material and it does not matter whether the natural rubber in the hydrogel blend is present in a major amount or a minor amount in the coating composition.
In contrast, the hydrogel only coating had a high degree of flaking as did a hydrogel blend coating that had about 90% hydrogel and only 10% elastomeric blend comprising natural rubber and nitrile. Similarly, Compositions F and G which contained only one elastomeric material and hydrogel at about 75% showed a high degree of flaking at a total solids content of 3%, 3.5%, and 4%.
The total solids content did not seem to affect the results for the hydrogel blend coatings. However, the stretch test did show that at a higher solid content of about 4% the hydrogel only coating exhibited a high degree of flaking and that adherence to the glove was not good. In contrast, the hydrogel blend of Composition B (from Example 2), Composition D and Composition E exhibited excellent adherence even at high solids content of 4%.
An additional stretch test was run utilizing solution D at about 4.7% total solids content which also yielded a result of 1, or no flaking of the coating at the higher solids content level with equal amounts of nitrile and natural rubber and about 75% hydrogel. Thus, a hydrogel blend having about 75% hydrogel and the remainder of the composition being an elastomeric blend, regardless of the amounts of each individual elastomeric material within the blend, exhibits excellent adherence properties to the glove and upon stretching the glove, no flaking is exhibited at all three total solids content levels tested. Therefore, a glove article can be coated with the hydrogel blend composition at high solids content without any flaking and exhibiting excellent coating adhesion to the rubber substrate.
A hydrogel blend coating formulation is provided according to Table 5 below. In particular, the hydrogel is provided at approximately 85% by weight, synthetic polyisoprene compound is provided at about 7.5% by weight and nitrile latex is provided at about 7.5% by weight in the hydrogel blend. Additional surfactants and a biocide are also included. The surfactants are added because of the additional elastomer materials in the coating composition, the surfactant can help to blend the synthetic polyisoprene compound and nitrile together in solution and effectively help to stabilize the two elastomers in solution. In comparison, a hydrogel-only solution is also provided. The hydrogel only solution was prepared without surfactants because it did not contain any additional elastomeric materials that it needed to stabilize. In addition, the hydrogel only coating cannot support a high amount of lubricant after coating due to not being able to meet the powder content specification requirement as per ASTM standard 3577; this is shown in more detail in Example 8.
The hydrogel blend coating composition has a total solids content in the range of about 3.5% to about 4.5%, unless otherwise indicated in the below tests. Typically, a total solids content of about 4% is targeted. The hydrogel only composition is at about 3% total solids content, unless otherwise indicated in the below tests.
The coating formulations prepared in Example 4 were each prepared at three different total solids contents; 3%, 3.5%, and 4% and were tested for coating adhesion to a synthetic polyisoprene substrate. A synthetic polyisoprene glove was formed using a process similar to that shown in
To test the degree of adhesion of the coating on the substrate, a stretch test is performed after the coating has cured on the glove by stretching and pulling at both the finger portion of the glove and the cuff portion of the glove where the glove is stretched from its rest position to a position that is 100% stretched, and it is then released back to its rest position. Once the coated glove is stretched, the tester can use a finger to rub on the coating of the glove to see if the coating flakes off. The gloves are measured on a scale of 1-3, where 1 is no flaking and 3 is a high degree of flaking.
In addition, SEM (scanning electron microscope) scans are also taken of each sample to show the surface morphology of the coated gloves after being stretched. The glove sample is cut to an appropriate size and shape, as specified per ASTM D412, with a die cut to prepare a test specimen used for the SEM test scan. One method for cutting the glove sample as adopted per the ASTM test specification is the dumbbell test specimen. The test specimen is then stretched with a tensometer to 500% of its original length and held for about one minute before allowing the stretched glove specimen to revert back to its original position.
The coating adhesion tests showed that the hydrogel polymer blend has an improved coating adhesion compared to the hydrogel only coating and the hydrogel blend coating does not flake off of the glove after being stretched. In contrast, the hydrogel only coated glove exhibited a high degree of flaking of the coating off of the final glove product. Test results for the adhesion tests are shown below in Table 6, where Composition A is the hydrogel only coating composition and Composition H is the hydrogel blend coating composition.
After the gloves were stretched and an observation was made of the flaking, a glove coated with Composition A and a glove coated with Composition H were scanned under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to observe the effects of stretching and flaking on the glove.
Another set of coating adhesion tests was performed using coating compositions having differing amounts of elastomeric materials added to the hydrogel. Table 7 below indicates the amounts of the ingredients used in the different compositions tested.
Similar to Example 5, a synthetic polyisoprene glove was formed and dipped into its respective coating composition. Once the coating was cured onto the glove the stretch tests were performed as described in Example 5 to measure the degree of coating adhesion. Results of the stretch test are shown below in Table 8.
The results of the stretch test show that even at non-equal amounts of the synthetic polyisoprene and nitrile latex the coating still exhibits excellent adhesion to the glove. Likewise, at a coating having greater nitrile latex content versus synthetic rubber latex, the coating adhesion is still excellent. This shows that whether the nitrile latex is present in a greater quantity or the synthetic rubber latex is present in a greater quantity does not affect the performance and properties of the coating adherence to the glove product; thus, the elastomeric materials can be present in any ratio. In particular, the glove base material was a synthetic rubber latex material and it does not matter whether the synthetic rubber in the hydrogel blend is present in a major amount or a minor amount in the coating composition.
In contrast, the hydrogel only coating had a high degree of flaking as did a hydrogel blend coating that had about 92% hydrogel and only 8% elastomeric blend comprising synthetic rubber and nitrile. Similarly, Compositions and which contained only one elastomeric material and hydrogel at about 85% showed a high degree of flaking,
The total solids content did not seem to affect the results for the hydrogel blend coatings. However, the stretch test did show that at a higher solids content of about 4% the hydrogel only coating exhibited a high degree of flaking and that adherence to the glove was not good. In contrast, the hydrogel blend of Composition H (from Example 5), Composition J and Composition K exhibited excellent adherence even at high solids content of 4%.
A mechanical stability test (MST) was performed to determine the mechanical stability of the coating compositions. The MST is a measure of the coating compositions ability to withstand high speed agitation without coagulating. It is determined by subjecting the coating composition, which has first been strained through a 180-μm sieve, to the action of a high speed stirrer. Approximately 50 grams of the strained solution is weighed out and placed into a test bottle. The bottle is placed onto the tester and is agitated at about 14,000±200 rpm for 30 minutes. The temperature is measured and recorded every 10 minutes to make sure that the coating composition temperature does not exceed about 60° C. at any time during the test. The agitated coating composition is then strained through a 180 μm filter and the coagulum obtained on the filter is then dried in the oven at about 100° C. until the weight of the coagulum is constant. The percentage of coagulum that remains on the filter after filtration is then recorded. The higher the percentage of coagulum that remains on the filter indicates poor stability of the coating composition.
Seven different coating formulations were tested: Composition A and Composition B as prepared in Example 1, Compositions F and G as shown in Example 3, Composition H as prepared in Example 4, and Compositions L and M as shown in Example 6. The coatings were prepared at 5% total solids content. The MST was performed by initially subjecting the coating compositions to a heating step at about 40° C. with continuous stirring throughout the test for the total 3 day evaluation, with measurements taken for 1, 2, and 3 days. The results recorded are shown below in Tables 9 & 10.
Based on the results obtained, it can be seen that the hydrogel only coating composition (Composition A) is much less thermally and mechanically stable than the hydrogel blend coating compositions (Compositions B and H). The coating compositions (F, G, L, and M) that contained only one elastomeric material in the blend also had poor stability showings. Therefore, the hydrogel blend composition having two different elastomeric materials at a high solids content of 5% showed good thermal and mechanical stability in solution.
The Mechanical Stability Test as described in the previous example was also performed on compositions with added stabilizer.
These compositions were tested in the MTS test.
Addition of Igepal CO630 and Darvan WAQ did not enhance the coating stability of Nobel-only coating (Composition A). However, the addition of the same stabilizers increased the stability of Composition B dramatically after 3 days, to a low value of 0.0094.
The coating samples of Compositions A and B were each treated with a lubricant solution on the coated natural rubber article as shown below in Table 12. Each of the gloves were first chlorinated at about 95 ppm chlorine and then lubricated with the lubricant solution of Table 13 by application via a spraying process. The majority of the lubricant solution comprises water with Darvan® L in the next greatest amount after the water, where Darvan® L is the tradename for a surfactant that comprises ammonium salts of alkyl phosphates, obtained from Vanderbilt Chemicals, LLC. In addition, the lubricant CPC (cetylpyridinium chloride) is added, an antifoam agent, such as Antifoam 1920 manufactured by Dow Corning Corporation, and a silicone emulsion, such as Silicone SM2140 manufactured by Momentive Performance Materials.
To measure the acceptability of the gloves sprayed with additional lubricant, the powder content of the gloves is measured. In order to be acceptable, the powder content of the gloves must be low, at about less than 2 mg/glove. The powder content of the glove is measured to determine the powder or particulate that remains on the glove after a chlorination process, if used, or after the final process step. Per the requirement in ASTM 3577, a powder-free glove is one that contains less than 2 mg/glove of powder content. To test the powder content of the coated and sprayed gloves, the gloves are put into a beaker with water, the beaker is shaken and the water is filtered to measure the residual powder content that came off of the gloves. The final results are shown in Table 14 below. Two sample sets were tested and are shown in Table 14 for each glove type, where five pieces of gloves were used to achieve one powder content data point for one sample set.
It can be seen from the powder content test that the addition of a lubricant, even one containing about 0.1% CPC provides a high and unacceptable level of residual powder on the glove coated with only hydrogel and treated with lubricant. The hydrogel blend glove can be treated with the lubricant CPC at 0.1% and does not show significant powder content on the glove. Thus, gloves coated with the hydrogel blend coating composition are able to be treated with a higher level of CPC lubricant as compared to the hydrogel only coated gloves.
Wet coefficient of friction (COF) testing was done to determine glove donnability following ASTM D1894. Coefficient of friction is defined in this test method as the ratio of the force required to move one surface over another to the total force applied normal to those surfaces. The lower the value, the less friction between the two surfaces. Thus low COF value indicates better donnability.
The ASTM D1894 test method, specifically for wet COF, covers determination of the coefficients of starting and sliding friction of glove film when sliding over itself or other metal plate at wet conditions. The procedure permits the use of a moving sled (wrapped with glove film) with a stationary plane.
A square film (glove) specimen, flat and free of defects, that is to be attached to the sled (a metal block 63.5 mm (2.5 in.) square by approximately 6 mm (0.25 in.) thick with a suitable eye screw fastened in one end) is cut approximately 120 mm (4½ in.) each side. The standard conditioning cycle for the specimens shall be 24 hours at standard laboratory conditions of 23±2° C. (73.4±3.6° F.) and 50±5% relative humidity. If these temperatures and humidity conditions cannot be met, the samples shall be conditioned for a minimum of 24 hours in the same room as the testing equipment. The test apparatus is assembled according to
A blend of 75% hydrogel, 19% natural rubber, and 6% Nitrile at 3 different TSC was tested in 5 samples. The mean is shown in Table 15 and the run data is shown in Table 16.
The Wet COF testing shows that the higher level of coating produces gloves with a lower Wet COF, or increased donnability. The ability of the hydrogel blend to be coated higher without flaking results, therefore, results in increased donnability.
Coated gloves were evaluated via a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to show the surface morphology of a coated glove after formation and curing. Four samples were prepared and tested; Composition A, Composition B, Composition F and Composition G from previous examples. Natural rubber gloves were formed and then coated, where each glove was coated with a different solution from one of the four. The coated gloves were then examined under a microscope and an SEM scan was taken at 100× magnification, these results are shown in
In turning to
Turning to
Coated synthetic polyisoprene gloves were tested for surface morphology using SEM scans. A polyisoprene glove was made using a similar coagulant dipping process as shown in
The polyisoprene glove coated with the first hydrogel-polyisoprene-nitrile blend was evaluated at 100× magnification (
The polyisoprene glove coated with the second hydrogel-polyisoprene hydrogel blend was also evaluated at 100× (
Thus, it can be seen that even with a different elastomeric article, i.e., one made from polyisoprene, the hydrogel only coating does not coat as large of a surface area as the hydrogel-polyisoprene-nitrile blend. Moreover, the hydrogel-polyisoprene-nitrile blend still shows a unique surface morphology that aids in providing improved donnability even with a different blend of elastomers.
For purposes of this disclosure, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features are described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves one advantage or a group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
Moreover, while illustrative embodiments have been described herein, the scope of any and all embodiments having equivalent elements, modifications, omissions, combinations (e.g., of aspects across various embodiments), adaptations and/or alterations as would be appreciated by those in the art based on the present disclosure. The limitations in the claims are to be interpreted broadly based on the language employed in the claims and not limited to the examples described in the present specification or during the prosecution of the application, which examples are to be construed as non-exclusive. Further, the actions of the disclosed processes and methods may be modified in any manner, including by reordering actions and/or inserting additional actions and/or deleting actions. It is intended, therefore, that the specification and examples be considered as illustrative only, with a true scope and spirit being indicated by the claims and their full scope of equivalents.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional application No. 62/243,116 entitled WATER-BASED HYDROGEL BLEND COATING AND METHOD OF APPLICATION TO ELASTOMERIC ARTICLES filed on Oct. 18, 2015.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 508514 | Gold | Nov 1893 | A |
| 676731 | Abbott et al. | Jun 1901 | A |
| 3714100 | Biale et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 4215179 | Melamed et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4233362 | Novak et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4252852 | Goth et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4258104 | Lee et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4482577 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4499154 | James et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4510204 | Duke et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4546014 | Gajria et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4562226 | Coombes et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4837057 | Bartoszek-Loza et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4975484 | Fryd et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4980410 | Fryd et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5314741 | Roberts et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5486426 | McGee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5492500 | Sinclair et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5516865 | Urquiola et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5545451 | Haung et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5649326 | Richard, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5688855 | Stoy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5723273 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5723274 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742943 | Chen | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5786135 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 6077602 | Liestman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6248826 | Solomon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6280673 | Green et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6306514 | Weikel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6347408 | Yeh | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353148 | Gross | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6376600 | Solomon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6391409 | Yeh et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6465591 | Lee | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476119 | Kucera et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6624274 | Suddaby et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6706313 | Goldstein et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6709725 | Lai et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6772443 | Soerens et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6895600 | Williams et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7032251 | Janssen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7329442 | Modha et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7341962 | Kitamura et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7455863 | Hamann et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7566502 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7585526 | Hamann et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7767251 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7771644 | Flather et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7794839 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7971276 | Eng et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7988983 | Yu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8076445 | Shane et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8110266 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8137735 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8250672 | Lipinski et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8399105 | Butz et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8499363 | Chou et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8656518 | Saunders et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8835014 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8980391 | Chen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9085663 | Chen et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9149567 | Eng et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9821092 | Bengtson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 20050127552 | Modha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132466 | Janssen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171248 | Li et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060141186 | Janssen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070048445 | Dimario et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070120294 | Peng et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136926 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070160754 | Blaise-Graftieaux et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243372 | Mowrey et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080124560 | Marcu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090035447 | Bottcher et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068443 | Curtet et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292081 | Suddaby et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100050311 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100068399 | Chernyshov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100255329 | Couvreur et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100263106 | Kassam et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316588 | Messier et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110077355 | Shikisai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099688 | Saleh et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145975 | Eng et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191936 | Lipinski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120065323 | Overton et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120246799 | Khoo et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130095257 | Mizusaki et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20140000006 | Perera et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171328 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140342096 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150128329 | Amarasekera et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150135403 | Mercado et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150143608 | Loo et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150157072 | Megat et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20170107403 | Woo et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2211561 | Aug 1996 | CA |
| 2211651 | Mar 2006 | CA |
| 0396431 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 1838767 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 2006071308 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2014203075 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2017070100 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| 2017164902 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/057503, dated Feb. 6, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Hydrogels—Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia, retrieved on Aug. 14, 2015, 1 page. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170107403 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62243116 | Oct 2015 | US |
