Patent Grant
9701829
The present technology generally relates to polymer-based coatings having high opacity.
Water-based emulsions leading to high opacity films and coatings are of interest for applications in various fields such as paints, inks, automotive coatings, fillers, etc. where hiding or opacity is required. In order to improve opacity in polymer emulsions, various approaches have been suggested such as incorporating inorganic materials (titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide, etc.) within the polymer or incorporation of air domains (hollow spheres) within the polymer particle to incorporate contrast of refractive indexes within the coating materials.
In one aspect, a process of preparing a water-based emulsion having an agglomerated polymer includes adding a first monomer feed to a reaction vessel in the presence of a first initiator and water to form an acid-functional polymer; neutralizing the acid-functional polymer to form a particulate polymer; and adding a second monomer feed to the reaction vessel in the presence of a second initiator to form the agglomerated polymer; wherein the process is a one-pot process; the first monomer feed includes a unbranched (meth)acrylate monomer, a (meth)acrylic acid monomer, a branched (meth)acrylate, and a styrenic monomer; the second monomer feed includes a hydrophobic monomer and optionally a (meth)acrylate monomer; the agglomerated polymer includes the particulate polymer; and the agglomerated polymer has a drupelet morphology. In one embodiment, the particulate polymer has an average particle size of from about 1 nm to about 1000 nm. In any of the above embodiments, the agglomerated polymer may have an average particle size of from about 200 nm to about 3000 nm.
In any of the above embodiments, the unbranched (meth)acrylate monomer includes methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, n-propyl methacrylate, n-butyl methacrylate, n-amyl methacrylate, n-hexyl methacrylate, 2-n-butoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-chloroethyl methacrylate, trifluoroethyl methacrylate, benzyl methacrylate, cinnamyl methacrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl methacrylate, n-octyl methacrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-phenylethyl methacrylate, propargyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, n-propyl acrylate, n-butyl acrylate, n-amyl acrylate, n-hexyl acrylate, 2-n-butoxyethyl acrylate, 2-chloroethyl acrylate, trifluoroethyl acrylate, benzyl acrylate, cinnamyl acrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl acrylate, n-octyl acrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl acrylate, 2-phenylethyl acrylate, or propargyl acrylate. In any of the above embodiments, the (meth)acrylic acid monomer includes acrylic acid or methacrylic acid. In any of the above embodiments, the branched (meth)acrylate monomer includes isopropyl methacrylate, isobutyl methacrylate, isoamyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, sec-butyl methacrylate, tert-butyl methacrylate, 2-ethylbutyl methacrylate, cyclohexyl methacrylate, cyclopentyl methacrylate, furfuryl methacrylate, hexafluoroisopropyl methacrylate, 3-methoxybutyl methacrylate, 2-methoxybutyl methacrylate, 2-nitro-2-methylpropyl methacrylate, n-octyl-methacrylate, 2-ethylpentyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, phenyl methacrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate, tetrahydropyranyl methacrylate, isopropyl acrylate, isobutyl acrylate, isoamyl acrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, tert-butyl acrylate, 2-ethylbutyl acrylate, cyclohexyl acrylate, cyclopentyl acrylate, furfuryl acrylate, hexafluoroisopropyl acrylate, 3-methoxybutyl acrylate, 2-methoxybutyl acrylate, 2-nitro-2-methylpropyl acrylate, n-octyl-acrylate, 2-ethylpentyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, phenyl acrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, or tetrahydropyranyl acrylate. In any of the above embodiments, the hydrophobic monomer includes styrene or α-methylstyrene. In any of the above embodiments, the first and second initiators individually include ammonium persulfate, potassium persulfate, sodium persulfate, tert-butyl hydroperoxide and dicumyl peroxide.
In any of the above embodiments, the neutralizing includes adding a base to the particulate polymer. In such embodiments, the base may include ammonia, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, methylamine, triethylamine, ethanolamine, or dimethylethanolamine.
In any of the above embodiments, the first monomer feed may be added in the absence of a surfactant.
In any of the above embodiments, the process may further include adding one or more of a surfactant, biocidal agent, dispersant, pigment, fillers, defoamer, wetting agent, light stabilizer, surface-active agent, thickener, or pigment stabilizer to the agglomerated polymer. In any of the above embodiments, the adding of the first monomer feed is conducted at a temperature from about 30° C. to about 100° C.
In any of the above embodiments, the particulate polymer has at least a first glass transition temperature of greater than 30° C. In some embodiments, the agglomerated polymer has at least a first glass transition temperature of greater than −20° C. and a second glass transition temperature of greater than 80° C. In some embodiments, the agglomerated polymer has at least a first glass transition temperature of from about −20° C. to about 50° C. and a second glass transition temperature of from about 80° C. to about 150° C. In some embodiments, the agglomerated polymer has at least a first glass transition temperature of from about 10° C. to about 40° C. and a second glass transition temperature of from about 80° C. to about 120° C.
In another aspect, agglomerated polymer particles produced by any of the above processes, are provided.
In another aspect, an agglomerated polymer particle is provided that includes two or more primary polymer particles wherein the agglomerated polymer has an aggregated drupelet morphology. In some embodiments, the primary polymer particles include a neutralized (meth)acrylate—(meth)acrylic acid—styrenic co-polymer. In some embodiments, the two or more primary polymer particles are sequestered in the agglomerated polymer particle by a hydrophobic polymer. In some embodiments, the hydrophobic polymer is a styrenic polymer. In some embodiments, the particles have an average particle size of from about 200 nm to about 3000 nm. In some embodiments, the particles have an average particle size of from about 200 nm to about 700 nm. In some embodiments, the primary polymer particles have an average particle size of from about 1 nm to about 100 nm.
In another aspect, a coating is provided including an agglomerated polymer particle including two or more primary polymer particles wherein the agglomerated polymer has an aggregated drupelet morphology. In some embodiments, the coating may further include a surfactant, a biocidal agent, a drying agent, a dispersant, a pigment, a filler, a defoamer, a wetting agent, a light stabilizer, a surface-active agent, a thickener, a or a pigment stabilizer. In some embodiments, the agglomerated polymer particle is prepared by any of the above processes.
In another aspect, an emulsion is provided, the emulsion including an agglomerated polymer particle having a drupelet-like morphology and including a primary particle phase having a surfactant-free polymerization product of an unbranched (meth)acrylate monomer, a (meth)acrylic acid monomer, a branched (meth)acrylate monomer, and a styrenic monomer; and a secondary particle phase having a polymerization product of a styrenic monomer, and, optionally, a (meth)acrylate monomer, where the primary particle phase has a smaller dimension than the secondary particle phase. In any of the emulsion embodiments, the primary particle phase may have an average particle size of from about 1 nm to about 1000 nm. This may include an average particle size of from about 200 nm to about 3000 nm. In any of the emulsion embodiments, the primary particle phase may have at least a first glass transition temperature of greater than −20° C. This may include the agglomerated polymer particle having at least a first glass transition temperature of greater than −20° C. and a second glass transition temperature of greater than 80° C.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part thereof. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here. The present technology is also illustrated by the examples herein, which should not be construed as limiting in any way.
In one aspect, a process is provided for the synthesis of water-based emulsions for the use in high opacity films and coatings. The process includes a one-pot synthesis in at least two stages. The first stage includes water-based polymerization of an acid functional (i.e. hydrophilic) monomer and polymerization of a hydrophobic monomer, in the absence of a surfactant. Neutralization of the acid-functional polymer with a base is then followed by a second stage of polymerization with additional hydrophobic monomer(s). The second stage includes adding an initiator and a hydrophobic monomer, thereby starting a second polymerization process that produces a second polymer comprising the particulate polymer. Addition of a non-ionic surfactant during or at the end of feed 2 helps stabilize the emulsions. This second polymer is termed an agglomerated polymer.
The one-pot process results in the polymer particles agglomerating into composite particles having an aggregated drupelet morphology. As used herein, a one-pot process is defined as a multi-step reaction, where all reaction steps are conducted in the same reaction vessel. In the above one-pot process, both first and second stages occur in the same reaction vessel. Such a one-pot process is more efficient in terms of required equipment, cost, and consistency of the process and eventual product.
As used herein, an aggregated drupelet morphology is defined as resembling the surface of a raspberry or blackberry. As illustrated in
Coatings prepared with emulsions of the agglomerated drupelet particles exhibit an increased opacity, as compared to coatings that are not prepared with such particles. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the agglomerated drupelet particles provide increased opacity due to one or more of the particles size of the agglomerated drupelet particles, the presence of air voids in the coating, or the increased pigment dispersability. For example, larger particle sizes of the agglomerated drupelet particles cause greater amount of light scattering in coatings. Additionally, the non-spherical nature of particles prevents tight packing of the particles in a coating, thereby causing air voids in the coatings. The presence of air voids in the coatings result in greater scattering of light due to higher contrast in refractive index between polymer and air, compared to polymer and polymer. Finally, the morphology of the latex particles may assist in the dispersability of the pigment particles, resulting in a more homogeneous distribution of the pigment within the coating. The agglomerated morphology of the particles having small hydrophilic domains on the surface of the larger agglomerated particles is believed to act as an effective pigment dispersant leading to the better dispersability of the pigment particles. The better the dispersion of pigment particles within the coating results in more distributed scattering centers (pigment particles) per unit volume of the coating resulting in higher scattering of light and improved opacity.
As noted above, the process includes at least two stages. The first stage includes the product of the free radical polymerization of at least two different (meth)acrylate monomers (hydrophilic monomers) and styrene (hydrophobic monomer) by adding a water-soluble initiator to produce smaller particle dispersions stabilized in water. The at least two different hydrophilic monomers are a non-branched (meth)acrylate and a branched (meth)acrylate. The branched (meth)acrylate provides for a lower glass transition temperature for the hydrophilic polymer particles as opposed to those prepared without the branched (meth)arylate, thereby imparting flexibility to coatings prepared with the emulsions.
The lower glass transition temperature of the hydrophilic polymer provides for better adhesion of the polymer particles to plastics. Accordingly, emulsions of such particles may be used to prepare coatings for plastics, flexible substrates, and flexible packaging. Illustrative plastics include, but are not limited to, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethanes, polyesters, and polycarbonates.
After the end of first feed, a base neutralizes the acid-functional dispersion. The polymerization of the first stage, followed by the neutralization step, results in the formation of drupelet-like particles that act as a seed for the second stage polymerization. During neutralization, the acid-rich phases become more water-soluble (hydrophilic) due to salt-formation resulting in migration of the neutralized acid-rich domains onto the surface of the multiphasic particles. The second stage includes the addition of further initiator and monomer to start a second polymerization, which leads to formation of larger drupelet-like particles. This technique results in emulsions with larger sized particles (e.g. >400 nm) with the morphology of a raspberry-type structure. A non-ionic surfactant may be added to the emulsion during, or at the end of, the second stage.
The general process is shown in the illustration presented in
After formation of the polymer particles under the surfactant-free conditions, the emulsion polymerization is neutralized by addition of a base, in a second stage.
When the first stage results in low molecular weight polymers in the hydrophobic phase, the hydrophilic particles are able to migrate into the water phase. Such polymerizations result in bi-modal size particles. That is, there are individual hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles in the product. However, when the molecular weight of the hydrophobic phase is high, the hydrophobic phase provides for adsorption of the hydrophilic particles to the surface of the hydrophobic phase, and into an agglomerated particle, having an overall rather uniform particle size. The increase in molecular weight of the hydrophobic phase prevents the neutralized hydrophilic phase (smaller particles) from being completely detached from the particle, resulting in the formation of aggregates that have a drupelet-like surface morphology. The morphology resembles that of a blackberry or raspberry, not only in shape but also in surface definition, with at least a portion of the surface of at least some of the smaller polymer particles protruding from the surface to give the surface the characteristic “bumpy,” “raspberry-like,” or “blackberry-like” appearance.
As will be apparent, the hydrophilic polymer particles formed in the first stage are necessarily smaller than the agglomerated polymer particles. According to one embodiment, the hydrophilic particulate polymer prepared in the first stage has an average particle size of from about 1 nm to about 700 nm. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymer particles have an average size from about 50 nm to about 700 nm. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymer particles have an average size from about 50 nm to about 250 nm. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymer particles have an average size from about 50 nm to about 100 nm. The agglomerated polymer particles may have an average particle size of from about 100 nm to about 3 μm. For example, in one embodiment, the agglomerated polymer particles have an average particle size of from about 200 nm to about 1 μm. In other embodiments, the agglomerated polymer particles have an average particle size of from about 300 nm to about 700 nm. In some embodiments, the agglomerated polymer particles contain at least two of the polymer particles of the first stage.
Without being bound by theory, it is believed that it is the agglomerated drupelet morphology that produces the desired opacity of the present materials, when they are employed in a coating capacity. Opacity in films is controlled by the amount of light that is scattered by the particles within the film, and the contrast in the refractive indices of the different mediums within the films. The drupelet-like morphology assists in causing large amounts of scattering and thus providing higher opacities. As illustrated in
The hydrophilic polymer particles and the hydrophobic polymer particles have different glass transition temperatures (Tg), when measured using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The different Tg for the two phases is indicative of the phase separation within the particle. In some embodiments, the hydrophobic polymer of the agglomerated polymer particles and particulate polymers have Tg (glass transition temperature) values that are greater than the highest temperature to which the coating will be exposed. This may be a Tg greater than room temperature, or greater than 80° C., or even greater than 100° C. In some embodiments, the hydrophobic polymer of the agglomerated polymer particles has a Tg from about 80° C. to about 150° C. In some such embodiments, the hydrophobic polymer of the agglomerated polymer particles has a Tg from about 80° C. to about 125° C. In some embodiments, the hydrophobic polymer of the agglomerated polymer particles has a Tg from about 75° C. to about 120° C.
The primary particles, i.e. the particulate polymers, may have a different Tg than the hydrophobic polymers, thereby providing for a two-phase transition of the agglomerated polymer particles. In some embodiments, the primary particles may have a Tg that is greater the −20° C. Thus, in some embodiments, the primary polymer particles have a Tg from about −20° C. to about 50° C. In some such embodiments, the primary polymer particles have a Tg from about 0° C. to about 50° C. In some such embodiments, the primary polymer particles have a Tg from about 10° C. to about 40° C. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymer particles (the “primary particles”) have a Tg from about −20° C. to about 50° C., and the hydrophobic regions have a Tg from about 75° C. to about 150° C. This includes embodiments, where the hydrophilic polymer particles have a Tg from about 0° C. to about 40° C., and the hydrophobic regions have a Tg from about 75° C. to about 120° C.
Another physical feature of the coating and agglomerated polymer particles that has a bearing on the degree of opacity is the number and size of the void areas between the particles. Void areas between particles are those areas that are not filled by particles, due to the particle shape. Reference number 15 in
The high opacity and hiding ability of coatings employing the agglomerated polymer particles is attributed to the polymers and morphologies described. Additives or pigments that are traditionally used for increasing the opacity and hiding ability of a coating are not required, although they may be used. However, exclusion of such additives may provide for lower cost coatings.
Opacity, as used herein, is defined as the ability of a coating to prevent the transmission of light. To quantify and compare opacity or hiding power of the various emulsions and their coating(s), contrast ratios of the dried coating(s) were measured on Leneta cards (contrast of the coating between white and black background). The opacity was then rated visually on a scale of 0-5 with 5-being best in opacity and 0 being worst in opacity. Coatings using the agglomerated particles emulsions typically exhibit a contrast ratio on Leneta card of greater than 30% (contrast ratio ranged between 10% and 80%) and visual rating of greater than or equal to 4.
In the first stage of the two-stage process, at least a first and a second acrylate and/or (meth)acrylate monomer (i.e. hydrophilic monomers), and a styrenic monomer (i.e. hydrophobic monomer) are added to a reaction vessel (i.e. the pot) in an aqueous medium in the presence of a free-radical initiator. The second stage also includes addition of a styrenic monomer, and optionally a minor amount of a branched or unbranched (meth)acrylate monomer.
Suitable unbranched (meth)acrylate monomers for use in the monomer addition of the first stage include, but are not limited to, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, n-propyl methacrylate, n-butyl methacrylate, n-amyl methacrylate, n-hexyl methacrylate, 2-n-butoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-chloroethyl methacrylate, trifluoroethyl methacrylate, benzyl methacrylate, cinnamyl methacrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl methacrylate, n-octyl methacrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-phenylethyl methacrylate, propargyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, n-propyl acrylate, n-butyl acrylate, n-amyl acrylate, n-hexyl acrylate, 2-n-butoxyethyl acrylate, 2-chloroethyl acrylate, trifluoroethyl acrylate, benzyl acrylate, cinnamyl acrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl acrylate, n-octyl acrylate, 2-phenoxyethyl acrylate, 2-phenylethyl acrylate, and propargyl acrylate.
Suitable branched (meth)acrylate monomers for use in the monomer addition of the first stage include, but are not limited to, isopropyl methacrylate, isobutyl methacrylate, isoamyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, sec-butyl methacrylate, tert-butyl methacrylate, 2-ethylbutyl methacrylate, cyclohexyl methacrylate, cyclopentyl methacrylate, furfuryl methacrylate, hexafluoroisopropyl methacrylate, 3-methoxybutyl methacrylate, 2-methoxybutyl methacrylate, 2-nitro-2-methylpropyl methacrylate, n-octyl-methacrylate, 2-ethylpentyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, phenyl methacrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate, tetrahydropyranyl methacrylate, isopropyl acrylate, isobutyl acrylate, isoamyl acrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate, sec-butyl acrylate, tert-butyl acrylate, 2-ethylbutyl acrylate, cyclohexyl acrylate, cyclopentyl acrylate, furfuryl acrylate, hexafluoroisopropyl acrylate, 3-methoxybutyl acrylate, 2-methoxybutyl acrylate, 2-nitro-2-methylpropyl acrylate, n-octyl-acrylate, 2-ethylpentyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, phenyl acrylate, tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, and tetrahydropyranyl acrylate. Suitable (meth)acrylic acid monomers include, but are not limited to, acrylic acid and methacrylic acid.
As used herein, the “meth” in parentheses before acrylic or acrylate is used to designate either the methacrylic or acrylic, or the methacrylate or acrylate compound. Suitable styrenic monomers for use in the monomer addition of the first or second stages include, but are not limited to, styrene and α-methylstyrene. Suitable (meth)acrylates that may optionally be added during the second stage include the unbranched and branched (meth)acrylates described above. One (meth)acrylate that may optionally be used in the second stage is ethylhexylacrylate.
As noted above, after the first stage is complete, a base is added. The addition of the base is intended to neutralize the acid functional polymer that is produced in the first stage. Suitable bases include, but are not limited to, ammonia, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, methylamine, triethylamine, ethanolamine, and dimethylethanolamine. The base may be added in less than stoichiometric amounts, or in stoichiometric amounts or in an amount that is a slight stoichiometric excess. The partial, or complete, neutralization of the acid-containing first stage polymer results in some, or all, of the polymer particles generated in the first stage polymer to increase in their hydrophilic character. The second stage of polymerization of the hydrophobic polymer following the base neutralization of the first stage polymer results in two different polymer particles species that are sequestered together forming the agglomerated particle.
As noted above, a non-ionic surfactant may be added to the emulsion during, or at the end of, the second stage. Such surfactants during the second stage may assist in stabilizing the emulsion. Suitable non-ionic surfactants include, but are not limited to, polyethylene glycol polymers, or poly(ethylene oxide-propylene oxide) co-polymers available commercially under tradenames such as Pluronic®, Tetronic®, Surfynol®, and Pluracol®.
The initiators used in either the first stage or the second stage may be those as are commonly used for free-radical polymers and which are water soluble. Suitable initiators include, but are not limited to, ammonium persulfate (APS), potassium persulfate (PPS), sodium persulfate, tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP), dicumyl peroxide, hydrogen peroxide, and the like.
Other additives that may then be added to the emulsions include additives such as, but not limited to, surfactants, biocidal agents; drying agents; dispersants; pigments; fillers such as a clay, calcium carbonate, and the like; defoamers; wetting agents; light stabilizers; surface-active agents; thickeners; and pigment stabilizers. As used herein, biocidal agents are materials that prevent or inhibit the growth of bacteria, viruses, fungi, or other biological fouling agents in the emulsions or products prepared with or from such emulsions. As used herein, drying agents, are materials added to a coating or emulsion to enhance the drying speed of the coating. As used herein, dispersants are materials that are added to a coating or emulsion to prevent or minimize setting of the emulsions or coatings after formation. As used herein, light stabilizers prevent, or minimize, degradation of the polymers by exposure to various light sources, including ultra violet light. As used herein, surface-active agents are materials that are added to the emulsion in order to stabilize emulsions. As used herein, thickeners are materials that are added to the emulsion to increase the viscosity of the emulsion. As used herein, pigment stabilizers are materials that are added to stabilize a pigment from fading and degradation.
According to one embodiment, the first stage of the process is conducted at elevated temperature. For example, the temperature may range from about 30° C. to about 100° C. In some embodiments, the temperature at which the first stage is conducted is from about 60° C. to about 90° C. The second stage may be conducted in similar temperature ranges. In some embodiments, the second stage is conducted at substantially the same temperature as the first stage. This is noted to be “substantially,” because, as those of skill in the art will understand, the temperature of the reaction vessel during addition of monomers, additional water, or other additives, may fluctuate slightly over time, or due to variation in thermostatted heating devices or baths.
The weight average molecular weight (Mw) of the polymer particles produced in the first stage of the process is from about 5,000 g/mol to about 1,000,000 g/mol. In some such embodiments, the Mw of the polymer particles produced in the first stage of the process is from about 200,000 g/mol to about 300,000 g/mol. The Mw of the hydrophobic polymer in the agglomerated polymer particles produced in the second stage of the process is from about 5,000 g/mol to about 1,000,000 g/mol. In some such embodiments, the Mw of the hydrophobic polymer in the agglomerated polymer particles produced in the second stage of the process is from about 200,000 g/mol to about 300,000 g/mol.
As will be observed from the examples, the process may include one or more holding, or equilibration, periods. Such periods may range from a minute or two to several minutes or hours. The holding, or equilibration, periods (the terms are used interchangeably), are for allowing completion of the reaction and/or for allowing the reaction mixture to be homogeneously dispersed.
In view of the neutralization of the acid functional polymer particles in the first stage, and the polymerization of a non-acid functional, hydrophobic monomer in the second stage, the final pH of the emulsion that is produced in the process is near neutral. In some embodiments, the pH of the water-based emulsion that is produced is from about 6 to about 8. In some such embodiments, the pH is from about 7 to about 7.5.
After the reaction is completed and the reaction mixture is cooled to room temperature, the emulsion is filtered.
Because the water-based emulsions are to be used in coatings, according to one embodiment, the viscosity of the water-based emulsion is one parameter that may be monitored or adjusted to provide for different flow rates, application conditions, and the like. Increasing the solids content of the water-based emulsion may increase the viscosity, or thickeners may be added to the emulsion to provide an increase in viscosity. In either event, the viscosity may be targeted to a value from about 50 cps to about 2,000 cps.
In another aspect, the agglomerated polymers described above are provided. As noted above, the agglomerated polymer particles have both a primary structure and a secondary structure. The primary structure is the particulate polymer formed during the first stage and includes a neutralized (meth)acrylate—(meth)acrylic acid—styrenic co-polymer having a small particle size. During the second stage the secondary structure is formed and includes agglomeration of the primary particles into an aggregated drupelet morphology.
Accordingly, in one embodiment, an agglomerated polymer particle is provided, including a host, hydrophobic polymer and at least two smaller polymer particles, where the agglomerated polymer particle having an aggregated drupelet morphology.
Emulsions of any of the above prepared agglomerated polymer particles are also provided. The emulsions may include an agglomerated polymer particle having a drupelet-like morphology. The agglomerated polymer particles include a primary particle phase that is the surfactant-free polymerization product of an unbranched (meth)acrylate monomer, a (meth)acrylic acid monomer, a branched (meth)acrylate monomer, and a styrenic monomer; and a secondary particle phase that is the polymerization product of a styrenic monomer, and, optionally, a (meth)acrylate monomer. These agglomerated polymer particles are those as described above having the dimensions, molecular weights, and glass transition temperatures discussed above.
In another aspect a coating is provided that includes the agglomerated polymer particles described above. The coating may be a paint, an ink, primer, sizing agent, overprint varnish, or other like coating. The coatings provides for a high opacity without the addition of other opacity enhancing additives such as pigments. However, such opacity enhancing additives may be included in coating formulations to further enhance the opacity, whitening, or hiding effects of the coating. Such coatings may include agglomerated polymer particles having a hydrophobic polymer including at least two smaller polymer particles, the agglomerated polymer particle having an aggregated drupelet morphology. The coatings may also include dispersants, pigments or other additives.
The coatings may include a wide variety of additives such as, but not limited to, surfactants, biocidal agents; drying agents; dispersants; pigments; fillers such as a clay, calcium carbonate, and the like; defoamers; wetting agents; light stabilizers; surface-active agents; thickeners; and pigment stabilizers, as described above. Pigments of all colors and type may be used, as long as they are compatible with the water-based emulsion coating.
Where the coating includes a pigment, the opaque coatings formed with the agglomerated polymer particles exhibit an improvement in hiding. For example, where conventional water-based emulsions are used, colored substrates tend to show through a single coating of the material, whereas where the opaque coatings are used, the show-through of the substrate is minimal or non-existent.
Such coatings may, of course, be applied to a substrate. Illustrative substrates include, but are not limited to, plastic, wood, concrete, ceramics, and glass. For example, the substrate may include, but is not limited to, flexible plastic packaging, polypropylene, polyethylene, treated plastic, polycarbonates, treated or oxidized polypropylene, treated or oxidized polyethylene as substrates, and the like.
The present technology, thus generally described, will be understood more readily by reference to the following example, which is provided by way of illustration and is not intended to limit the present technology.
Water (38.30 g) was heated to 85° C. in a reactor with stirring. After 15% of the first monomer feed (see Table 1) was added to the reactor, and a one minute hold, ammonium persulfate (APS; 0.17 g) dissolved in water (1.55 g) was added to the reactor. After a wait period of 10 minutes, the remainder of first monomer feed was added over a period of 45 minutes. Upon completion of the addition of the monomer feed, the feed tank was flushed with water (0.60 g). Ammonia (28% solution in water, 1.05 g) diluted with water (3.73 g) was then added to the reactor over a period of 10 minutes, and the reactor was allowed to equilibrate for 2 minutes. Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (70% solution in water, 0.19 g) diluted with water (1.09 g) was then added to the reactor. A second addition of APS (0.25 g) dissolved in water (1.83 g) was then added to the reactor. After a one minute hold, a second monomer feed (styrene 18.89 g) was slowly added with stirring over a period of 70 minutes. After 55 minutes into the second monomer feed, Pluronic F-127 a feed of Pluronic F-127 solution (a ethylene oxide-propylene oxide polymer; 3.54 g of a 13.2 wt. % solution in water) was fed into the reactor over 20 minutes. Upon completion of the addition of the second monomer feed, the monomer feed tank was then flushed with water (0.60 g), followed by the F-127 solution tank with water (0.60 g). After 5 minutes, sodium erythorbate (0.03 g) was then diluted with water (0.84 g) and added to the reactor over 5 minutes and held for an additional 5 minutes. The reaction was then allowed to start cooling and at 70° C., Pluronic P-1200 (polyethylene glycol, 0.74 g), and Pluronic F-127 solution (a ethylene oxide-propylene oxide polymer; 9.73 g of a 13.2 wt. % solution in water) were added, followed by a flush with water (0.72 g). After holding for 15 minutes at 70° C., the reaction was cooled and at 50° C., acticide MBS (preservative, 0.05 g) diluted with water (0.45 g), was added to the reactor. Cooling was then continued to room temperature and the emulsion was filtered. Examples 2-5 were similarly prepared with the reactant amounts listed in Table 1.
Examples 2-7 were similarly prepared with the reactant amounts listed in Table 1.
Examples 1-3 was a ladder study by addition of 2-ethylhexyl acrylate to the first monomer feed. By addition of 2-EHA, the Tg of the first phase was lowered. The tape adhesion marginally increased across the series until 3 where it significantly increased (Table 2). The opacity ratings of Examples 1-3 were all sufficient. Examples 1-3 suggest that the lowering the Tg of phase 1 caused improved adhesion of the films while giving a significantly large opacity advantage.
Based on the positive trend of adhesion, further reduction in the Tg of the first phase via addition of higher levels of 2-EHA in the first feed was performed (Examples 4 and 5). Adhesion greatly improved while water resistance and opacity were good (Table 2, below).
White Inks. White inks were prepare to a 21% pigment volume concentration by mixing Flexiverse® white dispersion WFD 5006 from Sun Chemical with the experimental emulsion from Table 1. The WFD 5006 contains 65% TiO2 pigment. The final ink solids was adjusted to 51-53%. The inks were drawn down with a K-0 rod with 4 micron wet film thickness on clear linear low density polyethylene film. The prints were dried in an oven at 60° C. for one minute. Table 2 lists select properties of the final formulated inks
Based upon the above examples, it is apparent that softening of the smaller particulate phase (phase 1) in RCD emulsion resulted in emulsions showing improved adhesion to plastics while maintaining the opacity in the films. Softening of phase 1 in RCD emulsion causes the continuous phase to coalesce and help film adhesion. To achieve the desired opacity at same PVC, the emulsions presented herein allow for a lessening in the amount of pigment due to the opacity increase of the particles.
The present disclosure is not to be limited in terms of the particular embodiments described in this application. Many modifications and variations can be made without departing from its spirit and scope, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Functionally equivalent methods, processes and compositions within the scope of the disclosure, in addition to those enumerated herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing descriptions. Such modifications and variations are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. The present disclosure is to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to particular methods, processes, reagents, compounds compositions or biological systems, which can of course vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.
As used herein, “about” will be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art and will vary to some extent depending upon the context in which it is used. If there are uses of the term which are not clear to persons of ordinary skill in the art, given the context in which it is used, “about” will mean up to plus or minus 10% of the particular term.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the elements (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All processes described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the embodiments and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the claims unless otherwise stated. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential.
The embodiments, illustratively described herein may suitably be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation or limitations, not specifically disclosed herein. Thus, for example, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” etc. shall be read expansively and without limitation. Additionally, the terms and expressions employed herein have been used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the claimed technology. Additionally, the phrase “consisting essentially of” will be understood to include those elements specifically recited and those additional elements that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed technology. The phrase “consisting of” excludes any element not specified.
In addition, where features or aspects of the disclosure are described in terms of Markush groups, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure is also thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of members of the Markush group.
As will be understood by one skilled in the art, for any and all purposes, particularly in terms of providing a written description, all ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all possible subranges and combinations of subranges thereof. Any listed range can be easily recognized as sufficiently describing and enabling the same range being broken down into at least equal halves, thirds, quarters, fifths, tenths, etc. As a non-limiting example, each range discussed herein can be readily broken down into a lower third, middle third and upper third, etc. As will also be understood by one skilled in the art all language such as “up to,” “at least,” “greater than,” “less than,” and the like, include the number recited and refer to ranges which can be subsequently broken down into subranges as discussed above. Finally, as will be understood by one skilled in the art, a range includes each individual member.
All publications, patent applications, issued patents, and other documents referred to in this specification are herein incorporated by reference as if each individual publication, patent application, issued patent, or other document was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety. Definitions that are contained in text incorporated by reference are excluded to the extent that they contradict definitions in this disclosure.
While certain embodiments have been illustrated and described, it should be understood that changes and modifications could be made therein in accordance with ordinary skill in the art without departing from the technology in its broader aspects as defined in the following claims.
This application is a U.S. 371 National Stage Application of PCT International Application No. PCT/US2012/052831, filed on Aug. 29, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/529,011, filed on Aug. 30, 2011, the contents of both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for any and all purposes.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2012/052831 | 8/29/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/10/2014 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2013/033188 | 3/7/2013 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3784498 | Ceska et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 4427836 | Kowalski | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4468498 | Kowalski et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4496620 | Park et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4701369 | Duncan | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4791151 | Kowalski et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4920160 | Chip et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4972000 | Kawashima et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5026782 | Biale | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5134173 | Joesten et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5912294 | Schade | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6017992 | Haddleton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6139961 | Blankenship et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 7081488 | Bardman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 20070065745 | Gerroir et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20100010118 | Bardman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102485755 | Jun 2012 | CN |
| H02-070741 | Mar 1990 | JP |
| 08-259701 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| H10-060024 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 3154477 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2009-507082 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2014-525503 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 2014-529666 | Nov 2014 | JP |
| 10-1999-0060687 | Jul 1999 | KR |
| WO-0170892 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| First Office Action received in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280041811.5 issued Nov. 3, 2014, 12 pages—with English Translation. |
| First Office Action received in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280042025.7 issued Nov. 3, 2014, 11 pages—with English Translation. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability received in Application No. PCT/US2012/052823 mailed Mar. 13, 2014 (10 pages). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability received in Application No. PCT/US2012/052831 mailed Mar. 13, 2014 (10 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion received in Application No. PCT/US2012/052823 mailed Feb. 1, 2013 (28 pages). |
| International Search Report received in Application No. PCT/US2012/052831 mailed Feb. 1, 2013 (4 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report received in European Patent Application No. 12827163.2 mailed Apr. 2, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report received in European Patent Application No. 12828245.6 mailed Apr. 10, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,050 mailed Jul. 14, 2016, 13 pages. |
| Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,050 mailed Oct. 27, 2016 (12 pages). |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/241,050 mailed Jan. 25, 2017 (10 pages). |
| Notification of Reasons for Refusal in JP Application No. 2014-528541 mailed Sep. 26, 2016 (6 pages). |
| Notification of Reasons for Refusal in JP Application No. 2014-528543 mailed Sep. 26, 2016 (9 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140228477 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61529011 | Aug 2011 | US |
