Water treatment facilities treat waste water to achieve one or more goals. For instance, a first goal may be to remove solids from the waste water. A primary treatment system may be devised to achieve this first goal. A second goal may be to break down organic components in the waste water. A secondary treatment system may be devised to receive effluent from the first system and to achieve the second goal. Accordingly, water treatment facilities tend to be developed serially with additional systems added downstream of one another to address the desired goals. Thus, overall facility cost and complexity grow quickly as additional water treatment goals are addressed. Further, added complexity inadvertently increases the chance of failure.
Nitrogen removal is one water treatment goal that has been increasingly addressed in recent decades. Consistent with the above discussion, nitrogen removal systems have increased facility cost and complexity with only marginal performance gains. The present concepts address cost, complexity, and/or performance for achieving desired water treatment goals.
The described implementations relate to water denitrification. One method obtains nitrate levels in influent and effluent of a moving bed media filter and determines carbon levels in the effluent. The method also doses carbon feedstock into the influent based on both the nitrate levels and the carbon levels.
Another implementation is manifested as a system that can include a media filter. The media filter can be configured to facilitate conversion of nitrogen from a form that tends to remain in the water, such as nitrate/nitrite to a form that tends to outgas from the water, such as elemental or diatomic nitrogen. The system can also include a dosing mechanism configured to dose a carbon feedstock into influent of the media filter to promote the conversion. The system can further include a controller for controlling the dosing mechanism based upon levels of carbon and nitrate in effluent from the media filter.
The above listed examples are intended to provide a quick reference to aid the reader and are not intended to define the scope of the concepts described herein.
The accompanying drawings illustrate implementations of the concepts conveyed in the present application. Features of the illustrated implementations can be more readily understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Like reference numbers in the various drawings are used wherever feasible to indicate like elements. Further, the left-most numeral of each reference number conveys the Figure and associated discussion where the reference number is first introduced.
Overview
This patent application pertains to water denitrification, and specifically to processes and/or techniques for effectuating and controlling denitrification. The denitrification can be promoted by dosing carbon feedstock for use by microorganisms involved in the denitrification process. The present implementations can efficiently control dosing by considering nitrate levels and carbon levels in effluent from the denitrification process. Considering both nitrate and carbon levels in the effluent can allow the present implementations to address instances of under-dosing and under-utilization of the dosed carbon feedstocks.
First Implementation
Nitrification process 106 serves to drive nitrogen in the water from an ammonia/ammonium form toward a nitrite and finally a nitrate form. Nitrification process 106 is followed by denitrification process 108.
The denitrification process 108 serves to drive nitrogen from the nitrite/nitrate form (generically referred to hereinafter as “NOx”) to its elemental form (i.e., N) and/or its diatomic form (N2). Elemental nitrogen (N) and/or diatomic nitrogen (N2) tend to be less soluble than nitrite (NO2) and nitrate (NO3) forms. Further, N/N2 tends to outgas into the surrounding air at a greater rate than NO2/NO3. This increased tendency to outgas as N/N2 can reduce nitrogen concentrations in effluent 110 of denitrification process 108.
Denitrification process 108 can be achieved utilizing various microscopic organisms. These microorganisms can metabolize organic molecules (i.e., carbon containing molecules) to release energy. Oxygen tends to act as a final electron receptor during these metabolic processes. Lacking oxygen, or once the oxygen is used up, nitrogen can be employed as the final electron receptor. This process breaks the nitrate ions to produce elemental nitrogen.
Various techniques can be employed to promote the biological activity of these microorganisms and/or to increase the number of microscopic organisms associated with the denitrification process. One such technique is dosing 112 of additional carbon feedstocks (i.e., food) 114 that can be metabolized by the microorganisms. Non-limiting examples of carbon feedstocks can include methanol (MEOH) and ethanol (ETOH), among others. While this technique can be performant, there can be several potential pitfalls. First, adding carbon feedstocks tends to be expensive. Second, residual carbon feedstocks in the effluent 110 tend to be undesirable. For these two reasons, it can be beneficial to not dose significantly more carbon feedstocks 114 than can be utilized by the microorganisms to achieve the denitrification process 108. Third, these microorganisms, like any other living things, are affected by their environment. For instance, some environmental parameter(s), such as temperature, may affect the metabolic rate of the microorganisms. Similarly, some environmental parameter, such as a toxin that appears in the water, may kill some or all of the microorganisms. Fourth, the state of the microorganisms tends not to be readily, directly, detectable in a timely fashion.
Accordingly, the present implementations can utilize indirect information about the state of the microorganisms to control dosing of the carbon feedstocks to satisfy at least the first two factors described above. Further, many of these implementations can achieve this dosing control with relatively few additional costs, components, and/or complexity. In fact, many of these implementations improve carbon feedstock dosing 112 over existing solutions with a simpler and more reliable system configuration than existing techniques.
One particular implementation can obtain NOx levels 116 in effluent 110 from denitrification process 108. The process can also determine carbon levels 118 in the effluent 110. Dosing 112 of the carbon feedstocks 114 can be based upon the effluent NOx and carbon levels. Briefly, increasing effluent NOx levels accompanied by decreasing carbon levels can indicate that the microorganisms are underfed and thus dosing levels can be increased so that the microorganisms can convert more NOx to elemental nitrogen. However, in an instance where both the carbon levels and the NOx levels are high and/or rising, some condition may be occurring so that the microorganisms are not utilizing (or are under-utilizing) the carbon feedstocks 114. The present implementations can detect this condition and take appropriate action such as reducing carbon feedstock dosing rates, temporarily stopping carbon feedstock dosing and/or triggering an alarm condition so that further action can be taken.
In contrast, existing technologies simply sense effluent NOx levels with no regard to effluent carbon levels. With these existing technologies, if the NOx levels rise, then the techniques responsively dose more carbon feedstocks. If the microorganisms are unable to use the carbon feedstocks (or under-utilize the carbon feedstocks) then these techniques have both wasted expensive carbon feedstocks and undesirably increased carbon bleed-through in the effluent. In summary, these existing technologies do not contemplate a scenario where the microorganisms cannot utilize the dosed carbon feedstock. This is especially true where some environmental parameter quickly changes and causes a sudden decrease in the activity of the microorganisms.
Second Implementation
Moving bed media filter 208 can be a continuous backwash filter that can be either an upflow, downflow, or other configuration. Briefly, in this case moving bed media filter 208 is a continuous backwash filter that utilizes a media, such as sand, to separate contaminants from water that passes through the media. The moving bed media filter can facilitate nitrogen conversion, such as by providing an environment that is conducive to growth of microorganisms.
A majority of the treated water emerges from moving bed media filter 208 as effluent 210. A minority of the treated water can be utilized to carry separated contaminants from the media in a waste stream or rejects 212. Cleaned media can be re-circulated for reuse. Examples of moving bed media filter 208 are commercially available, such as the Centra-flo brand available from Blue Water Technologies, Inc.
Denitrification system 200 also includes a dosing mechanism 214 for dosing carbon feedstocks 216 into moving bed media filter influent water 206. Doses delivered by dosing mechanism 214 can be controlled by a controller 218 as indicated by control signal 220. The controller 218 can base the control of the dosing mechanism 214 at least in part upon information obtained from moving bed media filter influent 206 and effluent 210, examples of which are described below.
In this case, the information can include carbon effluent levels obtained by a sensor 222 that sends a signal 224 to controller 218. Sensor 222 can sense chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC) or other suitable carbon level parameter(s). A flow sensor 226 can send a signal 228 to the controller regarding water flow rate of effluent 210. Similarly, a flow sensor 230 can send a rejects flow rate signal 232 to controller 218 regarding the flow rate of rejects 212. The flow rate of moving bed media filter influent water 206 can be inferred as essentially equaling the sum of the flow rate of effluent 210 and rejects 212. Since many existing facility configurations specify means for sensing the effluent rates and rejects rates, the present implementations can indirectly determine the flow rate of moving bed media filter influent water 206 rather than adding an additional sensor for this task. This is but one example of how the present implementations can be achieved with relatively low cost and little or no added complexity. However, while this implementation indirectly determines influent flow rates, other implementations can directly sense or measure influent flow rates, such as with a flow sensor or meter on the influent.
In this particular configuration a single nitrate sensor or probe 234 is connected to two sample streams 236 and 238 located in moving bed media filter influent water 206 and effluent 210, respectively. This configuration allows sensor 234 to send a first signal 240 relating to influent nitrate levels and/or a second signal 242 relating to effluent nitrate levels to controller 218. This is another example of how the present concepts can be implemented at relatively low cost. In other configurations, sensor 234 can be configured to sense alternative or additional nitrogen forms such as nitrite.
Controller 218 can utilize one or more of input signals 224, 228, 232, 240, and 242 to determine a dosing level that promotes conversion of nitrate into nitrogen (i.e., nitrogen gas and/or diatomic nitrogen) in moving bed media filter 208 without any (or excessive) carbon bleed-through into effluent 210.
Controller 218 can be implemented in many forms. At one extreme, the controller can be implemented in a black box form, such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) that may not be readily adjustable in the field. In another implementation, the controller can be implemented as an application on a computing device, such as a personal computer (PC). In such an implementation, the controller may generate a user-interface from which a technician can observe carbon feedstock dosing levels and/or adjust various algorithm parameters to accommodate specific facility effluent criteria. For instance, one facility may specify a lower allowed carbon bleed-through rate than another facility. In such a case, the algorithm can be adjusted to minimize carbon bleed-through by allowing slightly higher nitrate effluent levels.
Exemplary Methods
Block 302 starts a denitrification system/process. This can occur at startup of a water treatment facility and/or after the denitrification system has been stopped for some reason.
Block 304 doses carbon feedstock at a predefined level. The predefined level may be established when the controller is manufactured or may be defined and/or adjusted in the field, such as by an operator. For instance, the operator may set or adjust the predefined level via the controller's user-interface described above in relation to
Some implementations can utilize methanol (MEOH) as the carbon feedstock. In one example, the predefined level can equal a 3.3 MEOH to 1.0 NO3 (as N) dosing ratio by weight for the influent. Another example may start at a lower predefined dosing level such as 2.5 MEOH to 1.0 NO3 (as N) until a relatively steady state is achieved. Steady state can indicate that the microorganisms have adequately colonized the denitrification system and are generally in balance with their environment. Effluent NO3 levels may be elevated during startup. However, once effluent NO3 levels stabilize at the steady state, the MEOH dosing levels can be slowly raised to an optimum level with reduced risk of carbon overdosing and consequent carbon bleed-through in the effluent.
Block 306 runs the denitrification system for a period of time. For instance, the period of time may last until effluent carbon and/or NO3 levels achieve the steady state. Of course, as mentioned above, steady state does not imply that effluent carbon and NO3 levels remain at exact values since influent NO3 levels may vary over time. Instead, the steady state indicates that the microorganisms have adequately colonized the denitrification system and are generally in balance with their environment.
Block 308 obtains carbon and NO3 levels from denitrification system effluent. Rather than being viewed as a single occurrence, block 308 may be repeated multiple times, such as on a periodic basis, both during and after the period of time described at block 306.
Block 310 doses carbon feedstocks at a level based, at least in part, on the obtained carbon and NO3 effluent levels from the denitrification system. This dosing can be based upon the goals of a particular waste water treatment facility. For instance, one goal may be to reduce effluent NO3 levels as much as possible without overdosing carbon to the point of having carbon bleed-through. Previous technologies only sensed effluent NO3 and thus could not adjust carbon dosing levels to achieve this goal. Alternatively or additionally, other goals that can be met with the current implementations may be to lower NO3 to a specific concentration such as 3 mg/L NO3 (as N), or to lower it by a certain concentration, such as by removing 10 mg/L NO3 (as N).
For discussion purposes, the carbon feedstock dosing of block 310 may be based on one of three evolving scenarios. First, at 312, the obtained NO3 levels may be high and the carbon levels low. Second, at 314, the obtained NO3 levels may be low and the carbon levels high. Third, at 316, the obtained NO3 levels may be high and the carbon levels high.
In an instance where the condition indicated at 312 is detected then the method can increase carbon feedstock dosing levels at 318 to foster the biological activities of microorganisms associated with the denitrification process. Increasing the carbon feedstock dosing levels can increase both the number (i.e., biomass) and/or biological activity of the microorganisms so that more NO3 is converted to nitrogen.
Carbon feedstock dosing levels can be based on gross terms or tied to flow rates. For instance, one implementation can increase carbon feedstock dosing levels from 5 liters/minute to 6 liters/minute, for example. Another implementation can base the increase relative to the flow rate. For instance, hypothetically, this implementation can increase dosing levels from 0.5 milliliters carbon feedstock/liter of influent to 0.6 milliliters carbon feedstock/liter of influent, for example. In another example, dosing levels can be increased when effluent NO3 levels rise above a first pre-established value of 3 mg/L NO3 (as N). The process can then return to block 308 as indicated at 320.
In an instance where the condition indicated at 314 is detected (i.e., low effluent NO3 levels and high effluent carbon levels) then the method can decrease carbon feedstock dosing levels at 322 to reduce carbon bleed-through. In one quantitative example, dosing levels can be decreased when effluent carbon levels rise above a second pre-established value of 20 mg/L COD. The process can then return to block 308 as indicated at 324.
In an instance where the condition indicated at 316 is detected (i.e., high effluent NO3 levels and high effluent carbon levels) then the method can generate an alarm condition and/or reduce/stop carbon feedstock dosing at 326. Various actions can be taken responsive to generating the alarm condition. For example, a message indicating the alarm condition can be sent to a technician or system operator.
The detected alarm condition can occur when one or more environmental parameters affect the microorganisms in the denitrification process. For instance, a toxin could have passed through the denitrification system and killed many of the microorganisms. Thus, the dosed carbon feedstock is not being utilized (or is under-utilized). Further, manual and/or automated steps can be taken in response to the alarm condition. For instance, the technician may sample and analyze water quality parameters to check the readings and/or troubleshoot the system for mechanical or other system failures.
As indicated at 328, the method may cause the denitrification process/system to automatically restart by returning to block 302 in an attempt to allow a steady state to be re-established. Examples of other conditions that can be utilized to trigger the alarm condition can include when both the nitrate levels and the carbon levels rise for a predefined period of time. Another example can be when both the nitrate levels and the carbon levels rise by a predefined amount or percentage, or rise above a predetermined point for a predefined period of time.
An alternative algorithm can be based upon a difference or delta of the influent and effluent COD. Such an implementation can consider influent carbon loading (i.e., influent COD into the denitrification process) for determining carbon feedstock dosing rates. For instance, if increasing delta COD values are caused by increasing influent COD levels, then dosing levels can be maintained. This implementation can provide an alarm if the effluent COD exceeded some preset input value based on the discharge permit.
In one example, if a facility has a normal effluent of 20-40 mg/L COD then this method can subtract influent COD from the effluent COD. If the delta values exceed, for example 2 mg/L, then the method can decrease carbon feedstock dosing. If the delta value exceeds 4 mg/L, for example, and is trending higher, then the method can stop carbon feedstock dosing
Still another exemplary algorithm is characterized below for determining carbon feedstock dosing levels:
This method can be implemented with one COD analyzer with a split feed for influent and effluent and can cycle back and forth to reduce costs.
Some implementations may continuously readjust the carbon feedstock dosing levels each time effluent carbon and NO3 levels are obtained at block 308. For instance, assume that block 308 is performed periodically, such as every minute. Then, the carbon dosing levels of block 310 can be adjusted every minute. Other implementations can allow for buffering and/or averaging of the obtained effluent carbon and NO3 levels when calculating carbon dosing levels at 310. For example, the method can average the obtained values over an extended period of time and then dose carbon levels at 310 based upon the averaged values. For instance, such a method could average the values obtained at block 308 for an hour and then adjust the dose once per hour at block 310 based upon the average. Such a configuration may produce more consistent results and reduce oscillating above and below desired effluent levels.
Some implementations can also allow for the manual overriding and/or adjusting of the algorithm when desired. For example, the algorithm could vary depending on temporal or varying conditions—some sites have different nitrate effluent goals in summer vs. winter, etc. For example, such manual adjustments can be accomplished via the controller's user-interface described above in relation to
Block 402 obtains nitrate (NO3) levels in influent and effluent of a moving bed media filter. Some implementations may also obtain nitrite (NO2) levels. Nitrite levels can be utilized alone or in combination with nitrate levels (referred to generally as NOx).
Block 404 determines carbon levels in the effluent. Various analytical techniques can be utilized to determine the carbon levels. Carbon levels are often expressed as total organic carbon (TOC) and/or chemical oxygen demand (COD), among others.
Block 406 doses carbon feedstock into the influent based on both the nitrate levels and the carbon levels. Some implementations can base the dosing purely from the nitrate and carbon levels of blocks 402, 404. Other implementations can include other parameters to calculate the dosing levels. Other parameters can include, flow rate (either influent or effluent), alkalinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), water temperature, and/or pH.
In summary, the above described systems and methods allow more precise carbon feedstock dosing control than existing denitrification techniques. Accordingly, desired denitrification of effluent water can be achieved while reducing any instances of carbon feedstocks remaining in the effluent.
Although techniques, methods, devices, systems, etc., pertaining to wastewater denitrification scenarios are described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims are not intended to be limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed methods, devices, systems, etc.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/576,108, filed Oct. 8, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,741,154, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/106,520, filed on Oct. 17, 2008. Each of these applications is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2528099 | Wilcox et al. | Oct 1950 | A |
2696462 | Bodkin | Dec 1954 | A |
2730239 | Peery | Jan 1956 | A |
2863829 | Henke et al. | Dec 1958 | A |
3056743 | Eichhorn et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3499837 | Jaunarajs | Mar 1970 | A |
3537582 | Demeier | Nov 1970 | A |
3619425 | Blain et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3674684 | Gollan | Jul 1972 | A |
3679581 | Kunz | Jul 1972 | A |
3959133 | Fulton | May 1976 | A |
4003832 | Henderson et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4049545 | Horvath | Sep 1977 | A |
4126546 | Hjelmner | Nov 1978 | A |
4145280 | Middelbeek et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4197201 | Hjelmner | Apr 1980 | A |
4246102 | Hjelmner | Jan 1981 | A |
4366128 | Weir et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4448696 | White, Jr. | May 1984 | A |
4689154 | Zimberg | Aug 1987 | A |
4732879 | Kalinowski et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4842744 | Schade | Jun 1989 | A |
5087374 | Ding | Feb 1992 | A |
5102556 | Wong | Apr 1992 | A |
5173194 | Hering, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5180494 | Yamaguchi | Jan 1993 | A |
5190659 | Wang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5236595 | Wang et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5304309 | Sengupta | Apr 1994 | A |
5369072 | Benjamin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5443729 | Sly et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454959 | Stevens | Oct 1995 | A |
5468350 | Ban | Nov 1995 | A |
5534153 | Scott et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5670046 | Kimmel | Sep 1997 | A |
5674402 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676257 | Adkins | Oct 1997 | A |
5707528 | Berry | Jan 1998 | A |
5746913 | Chang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755977 | Gurol et al. | May 1998 | A |
5795751 | Apel | Aug 1998 | A |
5843308 | Suozzo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5876606 | Blowes et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904855 | Manz et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911882 | Benjamin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6077446 | Steiner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6129104 | Ellard | Oct 2000 | A |
6132623 | Nikolaidis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143186 | Van Unen | Nov 2000 | A |
6163932 | Rosen | Dec 2000 | A |
6200482 | Winchester et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217765 | Yamasaki et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6319412 | Reyna | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334956 | Hanemaaijer | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6387264 | Baur | May 2002 | B1 |
6426005 | Larsson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432312 | Fuss | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444474 | Thomas | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464877 | Mori et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468942 | Sansalone | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471857 | Kaibara | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6630071 | Buisman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6663781 | Huling et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6716344 | Bassi et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6942786 | Fosseng | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6942807 | Meng et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6982036 | Johnson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7029589 | McGinness | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7153429 | Pedros | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7399416 | Moller et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7445721 | Moller | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7713423 | Moller et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7713426 | Newcombe | May 2010 | B2 |
7744764 | Moller et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8741154 | Newcombe et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20010052495 | Friot | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003116 | Golden | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020077249 | Schlegel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088759 | Krulik et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020148779 | Shieh | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040035770 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040144728 | Moller et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040188348 | Yamasaki et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040222162 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050127003 | Dennis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050173348 | Drake | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050263447 | McGrew | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000784 | Khudenko | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060000785 | Moller | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070136919 | Bak et al. | Jun 2007 | P1 |
20070144966 | Janssen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070163958 | Newcombe et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070187329 | Moller et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267346 | Sengupta et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100032370 | Allen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2724254 | Nov 1978 | DE |
471277 | Sep 1937 | GB |
1596205 | Aug 1981 | GB |
03137990 | Jun 1991 | JP |
7-232161 | Sep 1995 | JP |
2001-070954 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002-159977 | Jun 2002 | JP |
WO 0110786 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2004050561 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sison, N.F. et al., “Denitrification with External Carbon Source Utilizing Adsorption and Desorption Capability of Activated Carbon,” Wat. Res., vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 217-227 (1996). |
Beltran, “Heterogeneous Catalytic Ozonation,” Ozone Reaction Kinetics for Water and Wastewater Systems, Chapter 10, Lewis Publishers, 2004, pp. 227-276. |
Ravikumar, et al., “Chemical Oxidation of Chlorinated Organics by Hydrogen Peroxide in the Presence of Sand,” Environ. Schi. Technol., 1994, 28, pp. 394-400. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140353247 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61106520 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12576108 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 14271945 | US |