The present invention generally relates to the production of petroleum and more particularly to compositions and processes for improving the recovery of petroleum from a subterranean geological formation.
For many years, petroleum has been recovered from subterranean reservoirs through the use of drilled wells and production equipment. During the production of desirable hydrocarbons, such as crude oil and natural gas, a number of other naturally occurring substances may also be encountered within the subterranean environment.
Many undesirable downhole products must be managed during the production of hydrocarbons. For example, scale, paraffins, fines, sulfur, heavy oil tar by-products, hydrogen sulfide, and water blocks commonly accumulate in and around the formation, well casing, production tubing and recovery equipment. Alternatively, it may be necessary to remove injected fluids from the near wellbore area, such as drilling fluids, cement filtrate, kill fluids, polymers and water blocks. To maintain an efficient recovery of petroleum, it is frequently necessary to clean or remove these accumulations and deposits.
The removal of unwanted deposits from the wellbore and production equipment is generally referred to as “remediation.” In contrast, the term “stimulation” generally refers to the treatment of geological formations to improve the recovery of hydrocarbons. Common stimulation techniques include well fracturing and acidizing operations. Well remediation and stimulation are important services that are offered through a variety of techniques by a large number of companies.
The effectiveness of well remediation and stimulation operations is greatly affected by the chemical agents used during these services. Operators have discovered that microemulsions can offer an advantageous vehicle for delivering solvents or other treatment chemicals to a targeted treatment area. Microemulsions are characterized as either water-in-oil (an aqueous phase is dispersed in an oil phase) or oil-in-water (an oil phase dispersed in an aqueous phase) mixtures. Microemulsions comprise droplets having a diameter in the range of about 1-100 nm. These systems appear clear or transparent to the human eye compared to conventional emulsion systems which have droplet sizes >400 nm in diameter and a cloudy appearance. Microemulsions are thermodynamically stable and exhibit no phase separation.
The separation of the oil and water phases depends on the creation of an interface of surfactant molecules between the water and oil molecules. Nonionic surfactants are often classified according to the hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) system. The HLB value of a surfactant is a measure of the degree to which it is hydrophilic or lipophilic, determined by calculating values for the different regions of the molecule. Originally, the HLB value was defined as a relative measure of the ratio of the weight percent ethylene oxide (EO) in a given nonionic surfactant.
Surfactants with lower HLB values are typically used for making oil-external (water-in-oil) microemulsions, while surfactants with higher HLB values are used for making water external (oil-in-water) microemulsions.
The prior art includes many examples that show that surfactants with an HLB generally greater than about 8 will produce oil-in-water emulsions, while surfactants with an HLB of about 3 to 8 will produce water-in-oil emulsions.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,380,606 (Pursley, et al.; Jun. 3, 2008) titled “Composition and Process for Well Cleaning” states that water-in-oil microemulsions should be prepared using surfactants with an HLB value of between 3 and 8, while oil-in-water microemulsions are prepared with surfactants having an HLB of 8 to 18.
An article by D. F. Brost and J. Silveira titled, “Surfactants Assist Water-in-Oil Monitoring by Fluorescence” in the October 2008 online issue of World Oil states, “Surfactants with an HLB less than 10 stabilize water-in-oil emulsions. Surfactants with an HLB greater than 10 stabilize oil-in-water emulsions. Within that group, surfactants with an HLB of 12-15 act as detergents and are commonly used to remove oil from solid surfaces.”
U.S. Pat. No. 3,919,411 titled, “Injectible Adjuvant and Compositions Including Such Adjuvant”, Nov. 11, 1975 by Glass, et al. states, “Where surfactants are used for dispersing oil in water, the final HLB number should be above 6. In the case where surfactants are used of the type for dispersing water in oil, the final HLB number should be below 6.”
In a presentation given to the Midwest Chapter of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists in 2004, Uniqema reported that for making water-in-oil emulsions, surfactants with HLBs of 4-6 should be chosen, while surfactants with HLBs of 8-16 should be used when making oil-in-water emulsions.
In direct contrast to the prior art, the present invention describes the surprising discovery that high HLB surfactants can be used to produce water-in-oil microemulsions that find use in oilfield and well treatment applications.
Although a number of compounds and techniques are known in the prior art, there is a continued need for more effective microemulsions for remediation stimulation services. There is a particular need to identify new surfactants and surfactant mixtures that can be used to prepare stable microemulsions.
In preferred embodiments, a well treatment microemulsion includes an oil external phase, an internal aqueous phase and a surfactant. The surfactant has a hydrophile lipophile balance of between 8-18. The oil external phase may include but is not necessarily limited to d-Limonene, xylenes, light mineral oil, or kerosene. The surfactant is configured to emulsify the water of the internal aqueous phase into the oil of the external (continuous) phase. Suitable surfactants may include but are not necessarily limited to polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan tristearate, polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate or mixtures therebetween.
In preferred embodiments, the present invention relates to the preparation of an oil external microemulsion, using a high HLB surfactant or surfactant mixture. It is well known that when two or more surfactants are mixed together, the HLB of the resulting combination is a weighted average of the HLBs of each of the components of the surfactant mixture. This HLB is reported simply as the average HLB. Select surfactants and surfactant mixtures with high HLB values have been discovered to emulsify water in a hydrocarbon oil phase. The use of a high HLB surfactant or surfactant mixture provides a new range of surfactants that have not previously been used in oil external microemulsions. In a presently preferred embodiment, the well treatment microemulsion includes an oil external (continuous) phase, an aqueous internal (dispersed) phase, and a surfactant component. The water-in-oil microemulsion may also include an alcohol component. The aqueous phase is preferably formed with water.
The oil external phase preferably consists of a hydrocarbon terpene or mixture of hydrocarbon terpenes. In preferred embodiments, the oil external phase is formed by using terpene hydrocarbons derived from citrus, pine, eucalyptus, peppermint or other sources. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the oil external phase is prepared using d-Limonene (CAS #94266-47-4; citrus terpenes). d-Limonene is commercially available from a variety of sources and is characterized as a biodegradable solvent. In alternate preferred embodiments, the oil external phase is prepared from a mixture of terpene hydrocarbons. In yet another preferred embodiment, the oil external phase is prepared from non-terpene hydrocarbons, such as xylenes, paraffin oil, a mixture of cycloparaffinic and isoparaffinic hydrocarbon, and mineral oil.
In a preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is selected as a nonionic surfactant or surfactant mixture having an HLB value of between 8 and 18. In a more particularly preferred embodiment, the selected surfactant or surfactant mixture has an HLB value of between 10 and 17.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated alcohol. In a more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohol. In a still more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohol with 5-20 moles of ethylene oxide (EO).
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated vegetable oil. In a more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated castor oil. In a still more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated amide. In a more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated C8-C18 amide. In a still more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated C8-C18 amide with 5-20 moles of EO.
In another particularly preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated fatty acid. In a more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated C8-C18 fatty acid. In a still more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is an ethoxylated C8-C18 fatty acid with 5-20 moles of EO.
In another preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is a polyoxyethylene fatty glyceride or a polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil (ethoxylated castor oil).
In another preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is a polyoxyethylene sorbitan ester. In a more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is a polyoxyethylene sorbitan monoester. In a still more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is a polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate.
In another particularly preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is a combination of two or more of the following: ethoxylated alcohol, ethoxylated vegetable oil, ethoxylated amide, ethoxylated fatty acid, polyoxyethylene fatty glyceride, and polyoxyethylene sorbitan ester. In a more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is a combination of two or more of the following: ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohol, ethoxylated castor oil, ethoxylated C8-C18 amide, ethoxylated C8-C18 fatty acid, polyoxyethylene fatty glyceride, and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monoester. In a still more preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is a combination of two or more of the following: ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohol with 5-20 moles of EO, ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO, ethoxylated C8-C18 amide with 5-20 moles of EO, ethoxylated C8-C18 fatty acid with 5-20 moles of EO, polyoxyethylene fatty glyceride, and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate. In alternate preferred embodiments, other nonionic surfactants can be included with these combinations, as long as the HLB of the surfactant mixture is between 8 and 18. For example, sorbitan monooleate (HLB 4.3) can be included with one or more nonionic surfactants to create a suitable surfactant combination having an HLB between 8 and at least 11.
Some examples of surfactants that have been successfully used to create oil-external microemulsions include Stepantex CO-30 (ethoxylated castor oil with 30 moles of EO, sold by Stepan Company), Tomadol 91-6 (ethoxylated C9-C11 alcohol with 6 moles of EO, sold by Air Products), Biosoft N91-6 (ethoxylated C9-C11 alcohol with 6 moles of EO, sold by Stepan Company), Tween 20 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, sold by Croda USA), Tween 40 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitate, sold by Croda USA), Tween 60 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate, sold by Croda USA), Tween (polyoxyethylene sorbitan tristearate, sold by Croda USA), Tween 80 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, sold by Croda USA), Tween 81 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, sold by Croda USA), a combination of Span 80 (sorbitan monooleate) and Cirrasol G-1292 Special (polyoxyethylene fatty glyceride; both sold by Croda USA), and Biosoft N1-9 (ethoxylated C11 alcohol with 9 moles of EO, sold by Stepan Company). It should be noted that surfactants and mixtures of surfactants (also known as “surfactant packages”) often contain ingredients in addition to the specified surface active agents. These ingredients can vary from supplier to supplier, and may even vary within a particular supplier, as long as the resulting surfactant or surfactant package meets certain performance requirements and/or physical specifications. These ingredients may include normal product variations due to the manufacturing processes of the surfactant or surfactant package, and they may also include materials that are naturally introduced by the source feedstock. Other ingredients may be intentionally added to the surfactant or surfactant package. These ingredients include, but are not limited to, stabilizers, modifiers, solvents, antioxidants, dispersants, solubilizers, handling aids, physical property modifiers, and the like.
In yet another alternate preferred embodiment, the surfactant component selected is an anionic surfactant, including but not limited to sulfonates, specifically internal olefin sulfonates and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates. Presently preferred anionic surfactants include C15-C18 internal olefin sulfonates (available as Petrostep S2, sold by Stepan Company) and linear alkylbenzene sulfonate/linear sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonates (available as Polystep LAS-50, sold by Stepan Company).
In yet another alternate preferred embodiment, the surfactant component is selected as a combination of nonionic and anionic surfactants, such as but not limited to ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated castor oil, and sulfonates. Presently preferred nonionic/anionic surfactant combinations comprise ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohol with 5-20 moles EO, ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO, and C15-C18 internal olefin sulfonates.
The alcohol molecules of the well treatment microemulsion stabilize the microemulsion through interactions at the water and oil interface, thereby further stabilizing the microemulsion. The alcohol also lowers the freezing point of the well treatment microemulsion. Although isopropanol is presently preferred, alternative suitable alcohols include midrange primary, secondary and tertiary alcohols with between 1 and 20 carbon atoms, such as ethanol, t-butanol, n-butanol, n-pentanol, n-hexanol and 2-ethyl-hexanol. Other freeze prevention additives can additionally or alternatively be added, such as detergent range alcohols ethoxylate, ethylene glycols (EG), polyethylene glycols (PEG), propylene glycols (PG) and triethylene glycols (TEG), with triethylene glycol being presently preferred.
In preferred embodiments, the well treatment microemulsion comprises 30-60% by weight terpene mixture or non-terpene hydrocarbons (oil phase), 25-50% by weight surfactant or surfactant mixture (surfactant component), 5-30% by weight water (aqueous phase), 0-3% by weight TEG (alcohol) and 0-35% isopropyl alcohol (alcohol). Using the various components identified above, the following preferred well treatment microemulsion formulations can be prepared.
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant mixture. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 9.64% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.36% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 32.8% by weight surfactant mixture having an average HLB of about 10 and comprising the following surfactants: (i) polyoxyethylene castor oil (Cirrasol G-1292 Special, sold by Croda USA) and (ii) sorbitan monooleate (Span 80, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 35.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 9.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 32.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 20.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 10 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 81, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant mixture. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight xylenes (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 9.64% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), 1.36% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 32.8% by weight surfactant mixture having an average HLB of about 10 and comprising the following surfactants: (i) polyoxyethylene fatty glyceride (Cirrasol G-1292 Special, sold by Croda USA) and (ii) sorbitan monooleate (Span 80, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohol and a surfactant mixture. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 43% by weight of light mineral oil (external oil phase), about 10% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 11% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), and about 36% by weight of a surfactant mixture having an average HLB of about 10 and comprising the following surfactants: sorbitan monooleate (Span 80, sold by Croda USA) and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 35.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 9.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 32.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 20.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 10.5 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan tristearate (Tween 65, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 9.64% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.36% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 32.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 10.8 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene fatty glyceride (Cirrasol G-1292 Special, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant package. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight terpene hydrocarbon mixture-1 (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant mixture having an HLB of about 12.5 and comprising the following surfactant: ethoxylated C9-C11 alcohol with 6 moles EO (Tomadol 91-6, sold by Air Products).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant package. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant mixture having an average HLB of about 12.8 and comprising the following surfactants: (i) ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO and (ii) ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohol with 5-20 moles EO.
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant package. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 13 and comprising the following surfactant: ethoxylated castor oil with 30 moles of EO (Stepantex CO 30, sold by Stepan Company).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant mixture. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (aqueous phase), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant mixture having an average HLB of about 13.1 and comprising the following surfactants: (i) ethoxylated C8-C18 amide with 5-20 moles of EO; (ii) ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO; and (iii) ethoxylated C8-C18 fatty acid with 5-20 moles of EO. Tables 1 and 2 below provides the thermal analysis and solubility tests, respectively, of the well treatment microemulsion of Example 10.
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant mixture. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 44.7% by weight citrus pine terpene-hydrocarbon mixture-1 (external oil phase), about 15.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 1.7% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 38.2% by weight surfactant mixture having an average HLB of about 13.1 and comprising the following surfactants: (i) ethoxylated C8-C18 amide with 5-20 moles of EO; (ii) ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO; and (iii) ethoxylated C8-C18 fatty acid with 5-20 moles of EO.
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant mixture. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 44.7% by weight citrus pine terpene-hydrocarbon mixture-2 (external oil phase), about 15.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 1.7% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 38.2% by weight surfactant mixture having an average HLB of about 13.1 and comprising the following surfactants: (i) ethoxylated C8-C18 amide with 5-20 moles of EO; (ii) ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO; and (iii) ethoxylated C8-C18 fatty acid with 5-20 moles of EO.
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 13.9 comprising the following surfactant: ethoxylated C11 alcohol with 9 moles EO (Biosoft N1-9, sold by Stepan Company).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 14.9 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate (Tween 60, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohol and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 40.2% by weight of a mixture of Conosol 145 (external oil phase comprised of cycloparaffinic and isoparaffinic hydrocarbons, sold by Calumet Specialty Products Partners), about 13.8% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 6.2% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), and about 39.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 14.9 and comprising the surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate (Tween 60, sold by Croda US).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 9.64% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.36% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 32.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 15 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohol and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 42.5% by weight of kerosene (external oil phase), about 10.6% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 6.5% by weight tertiary butanol (alcohol), and about 40.4% by weight of a surfactant with an HLB of about 15 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion can be made with aromatic comprising hydrocarbons. An example includes about 41.8% by weight xylenes (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 9.64% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), 1.36% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 32.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 15 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 15.6 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitate (Tween 40, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight surfactant having an HLB of about 16.7 and comprising the following surfactant: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20, sold by Croda USA).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 44.7% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 15.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 1.7% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 38.2% by weight anionic surfactant comprising a linear sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (Polystep LAS-50, sold by Stepan Company).
An oil-external well treatment microemulsion includes a continuous oil phase, a dispersed water phase, alcohols and a surfactant. The well treatment microemulsion contains about 41.8% by weight d-Limonene (external oil phase), about 14.4% by weight water (dispersed aqueous phase), about 6.4% by weight isopropanol (alcohol), about 1.6% by weight triethylene glycol (alcohol), and about 35.8% by weight of a surfactant mixture comprising: (i) ethoxylated castor oil with 25-45 moles of EO, (ii) ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohol with 5-20 moles EO (iii), and an anionic surfactant comprising a C15-C18 internal olefin sulfonate (Petrostep S2, sold by Stepan Company).
Although for the purposes of the present disclosure preferred embodiments of the well treatment microemulsions are described in connection with well remediation, stimulation, acidizing operations, drilling operations and hydrogen sulfide mitigation applications, it will be understood that the inventive well treatment microemulsions can be used in additional, alternative applications. For example, it is contemplated that the well treatment microemulsion could also be used to clean surface equipment and downhole equipment.
In well remediation applications, the selected well treatment microemulsion is preferably injected directly into the wellbore through the production tubing or through the use of coiled tubing or similar delivery mechanisms. Once downhole, the well treatment microemulsion remedies drilling damage, fracturing fluid damage, water blocks and removes fines, asphaltenes and paraffins from the formation and wellbore. The well treatment microemulsion also serves to thin heavy hydrocarbons, alleviate water blocks and lower pore pressure in the formation.
During drilling operations, the well treatment microemulsions can be added to drilling fluids and injected into the wellbore through the drill string. The well treatment microemulsion is effective at removing fines and debris from the wellbore created by the drilling process.
The inventive well treatment microemulsions can also be used in stimulation operations.
The well treatment microemulsions can also be used to deliver acids during acidizing operations. Acids commonly used include hydrochloric, acetic, formic, and hydrochloric-hydrofluoric acids. In a presently preferred embodiment, the selected microemulsion is combined with an acidified carrier fluid to prepare a microemulsion suitable for acidizing operations.
As mentioned above, the inventive microemulsions can also be used for hydrogen sulfide mitigation. In preferred embodiments, the well treatment microemulsions are injected into the wellbore so that escaping hydrogen sulfide gas is “stripped” through the well treatment microemulsions. Preferably, the inventive microemulsion is periodically injected into problem wells to mitigate hydrogen sulfide production. Alternatively, the microemulsion can be injected downhole via capillary tubing on a continuous basis. In yet another alternate embodiment, the well treatment microemulsion can be placed in a container that is placed in fluid communication with the hydrogen sulfide.
It is clear that the present invention is well adapted to carry out its objectives and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein. While presently preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in varying detail for purposes of disclosure, it will be understood that numerous changes may be made which will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art and which are encompassed within the scope of the appended claims and within the spirit of the invention disclosed in the written description.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/114,125, filed Nov. 13, 2008, entitled “Water-in-Oil Microemulsions for Oilfield Applications,” the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3060210 | De Groote | Apr 1961 | A |
3047062 | Meadors | Jul 1962 | A |
3347789 | Dickson et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3368624 | Heuer et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3483923 | Darley | Dec 1969 | A |
3710865 | Kiel | Jan 1973 | A |
3756319 | Holm et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3760881 | Kiel | Sep 1973 | A |
3850248 | Carney | Nov 1974 | A |
3919411 | Glass et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4206809 | Jones | Jun 1980 | A |
4276935 | Hessert et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4360061 | Canter et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4414128 | Goffinet | Nov 1983 | A |
4511488 | Matta | Apr 1985 | A |
4650000 | Andreasson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
5008026 | Gardner et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5034140 | Gardner et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5076954 | Loth et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083613 | Gregoli et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5095989 | Prukop | Mar 1992 | A |
5217531 | Cheung | Jun 1993 | A |
5247995 | Tjon-Joe-Pin et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5310002 | Blauch et al. | May 1994 | A |
5356482 | Mehta et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5587354 | Duncan, Jr. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587357 | Rhinesmith | Dec 1996 | A |
5652200 | Davies et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5665689 | Durbut | Sep 1997 | A |
5676763 | Salisbury et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5697458 | Carney | Dec 1997 | A |
5707940 | Bush et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5762138 | Ford et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784386 | Norris | Jul 1998 | A |
5811383 | Klier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830831 | Chan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5874386 | Chan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5925233 | Miller et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5975206 | Woo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5977032 | Chan | Nov 1999 | A |
5990072 | Gross et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996692 | Chan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6046140 | Woo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6090754 | Chan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110885 | Chan | Aug 2000 | A |
6112814 | Chan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6165946 | Mueller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173776 | Furman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191090 | Mondin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6228830 | Vlasblom | May 2001 | B1 |
6260621 | Furman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302209 | Thompson, Sr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6364020 | Crawshaw et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6486115 | Weaver et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6581687 | Collins et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593279 | Von Krosigk et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6613720 | Feraud et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6729402 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6770603 | Sawdon et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6793025 | Patel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800593 | Dobson, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818595 | Benton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6911417 | Chan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6939832 | Collins | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6984610 | VonKrosigk et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021378 | Prukop | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7134496 | Jones et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7205262 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7205264 | Boles | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231976 | Berry et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7380606 | Pursley et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392844 | Berry et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407915 | Jones et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7468402 | Yang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481273 | Javora et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7514390 | Chan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7514391 | Chan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533723 | Hughes et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7543644 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543646 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7544639 | Pursley et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7547665 | Welton et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552771 | Eoff et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559369 | Roddy et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7581594 | Tang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7615516 | Yang et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621334 | Welton et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622436 | Tuzi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7655603 | Crews | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7677311 | Abad et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687439 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709421 | Jones et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7712534 | Bryant et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727936 | Pauls et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7727937 | Pauls et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730958 | Smith | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7825073 | Welton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7833943 | Van Zanten et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7838467 | Jones et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846877 | Robb | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7851414 | Yang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855168 | Fuller et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857051 | Abad et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7886824 | Kakadjian et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893010 | Ali et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7902123 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906464 | Davidson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910524 | Welton et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7931088 | Stegemoeller et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7960314 | Van Zanten et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960315 | Welton et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963720 | Hoag et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7971659 | Gatlin et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7976241 | Hoag et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7989404 | Kakadjian et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7992656 | Dusterhoft et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7998911 | Berger et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8043996 | Harris | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8053396 | Huff et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8053397 | Huang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057682 | Hoag et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8091644 | Clark et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8091645 | Quintero et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8091646 | Quintero et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100190 | Weaver et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8148303 | Van Zanten et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8183182 | Oliveira et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8206062 | Hoag et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207096 | van Zanten et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210263 | Quintero et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220546 | Kakadjian et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227382 | Dakin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231947 | Vaidya et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235120 | Quintero et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8242059 | Sawdon | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8293687 | Giffin | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8342241 | Hartshorne et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8349771 | Seth et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8356667 | Quintero et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357639 | Quintero et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8372789 | Harris et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8383560 | Pich et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403051 | Huang et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8404623 | Robb et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8413721 | Welton et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8415279 | Quintero et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8431620 | Del Gaudio et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8453741 | van Zanten | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8499832 | Crews et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8517100 | Ali et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8517104 | Kieffer | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524643 | Huff et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8551926 | Huang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8592350 | van Zanten et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8684079 | Wattenbarger et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8778850 | Andrecola | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8865632 | Parnell et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
20010007663 | Von Corswant | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030022944 | Gumkowski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069143 | Collins | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030166472 | Pursley et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20060014648 | Milson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070123445 | Tuzi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070293404 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295368 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080274918 | Quintero et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287324 | Pursley et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090078415 | Fan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090137432 | Sullivan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090159288 | Horvath Szabo et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090260819 | Kurian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275488 | Zamora et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100022421 | Gutierrez et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100173805 | Pomerleau | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100216670 | Del Gaudio et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100243248 | Golomb et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252267 | Harris et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100307757 | Blow et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021386 | Ali et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110136706 | Carroll et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146983 | Sawdon | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110220353 | Bittner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237467 | Cornette et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110253365 | Crews et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110290491 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120015852 | Quintero et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035085 | Parnell et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120080232 | Muller et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120129738 | Gupta et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120149626 | Fluck et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168165 | Holcomb et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120181019 | Saini et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193095 | Varadaraj et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208726 | Smith et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234548 | Dyer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120241155 | Ali et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120241220 | Quintero et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255887 | Holms et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261120 | Del Gaudio et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285690 | Weaver et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120285694 | Morvan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120318515 | Cawiezel et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120322697 | Zhang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120325492 | Fefer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130029883 | Dismuke et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130048281 | Van Zanten et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130079255 | Del Gaudio et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130109597 | Sarkar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133886 | Quintero | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137611 | Pierce et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146288 | Smith et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130146545 | Pabalan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130153232 | Bobier et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130153234 | Bobier et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130192826 | Kurian et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233559 | van Zanten et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130244913 | Maberry et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261033 | Nguyen | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130292121 | Penny et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140110344 | Hoag et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140202700 | Blair | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140299325 | Zelenev et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140332212 | Ayers et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2345305 | Apr 2000 | CA |
2394858 | Jun 2001 | CA |
102127414 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102277143 | Dec 2011 | CN |
103614128 | Mar 2014 | CN |
103642477 | Mar 2014 | CN |
1 051 237 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 378 554 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 786 879 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2 195 400 | Aug 2012 | EP |
1 880 081 | Mar 2013 | EP |
WO 9949182 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 2007011475 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2012158645 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
[No Author Listed], The HLB system: a time-saving guide to emulsifier selection. ICI Americas Inc. 1976. Revised 1980. 22 pages. |
Haw, The HLB system: a time saving guide to surfactant selection. Presentation to the Midwest chapter of the society of cosmetic chemists. Mar. 9, 2004. 39 slides. |
ADM, Evolution Chemicals E5789-117 Description. Jun. 2014. |
Brost et al., Surfactants assist water-in-oil monitoring by fluroescence. World Oil. Oct. 2008;229(10). Published Online. |
Champagne et al., Critical assessment of microemulsion technology for enhancing fluid recovery from tight gas formations and propped fractures. SPE European Formation Damage Conference. Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Jun. 7-10, 2011. SPE-144095. 10 pages. |
Crafton et al., Micro-emulsion effectiveness for twenty four wells, eastern green river, wyoming. 2009 SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference. Denver, Colorado, USA, Apr. 14-16, 2009. SPE-123280. 13 pages. |
Howard et al., Comparison of flowback aids: understanding their capillary pressure and wetting properties. SPE Production & Operations. Aug. 2010;:376-87. |
Kunieda et al. Evaluation of hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) of nonionic surfactants. J Colloid and Interface Sci. Sep. 1985;107(1):107-21. |
Yang et al., Optimizing nanoemulsions as fluid flowback additives in enhancing tight gas production. J Petroleum Sci Eng. 2014;121:122-5. |
Zelenev et al., Microemulsion technology for improved fluid recovery and enhanced core permeability to gas. 2009 SPE European Formation Damage Conference. Scheveningen, The Netherlands. May 27-29, 2009. SPE 122109. 13 pages. |
Zelenev et al., Microemulsion-assisted fluid recovery and improved permeability to gas in shale formations. 2010 SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control. Lafayette, Louisiana, USA. Feb. 10-12, 2010. SPE 127922. 7 pages. |
Zelenev, Surface energy of north American shales and its role in interaction of shale with surfactants and microemulsions. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. The Woodlands, Texas, USA. Apr. 11-13, 2011. SPE-141459. 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61114125 | Nov 2008 | US |