Water purification device for arsenic removal

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8475658
  • Patent Number
    8,475,658
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 2, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 2, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Arsenic is removed from water and other aqueous feeds by (1) treating the feed with a compound containing cerium in the +4 oxidation state, preferably cerium dioxide, to oxidize arsenic in the +3 oxidation state to arsenic in the +5 oxidation state and (2) removing the arsenic in the +5 oxidation state from the aqueous phase, normally by contacting the treated feed with alumina or other precipitating agent containing cations in the +3 oxidation state.
Description
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

This invention relates generally to methods, compositions and devices for removing arsenic from aqueous streams and is particularly concerned with methods, compositions and devices for removing arsenic from groundwater and drinking water using cerium in the +4 oxidation state to oxidize arsenic so it can be precipitated from the water.


Arsenic is a toxic element that naturally occurs in a variety of combined forms in the earth. Its presence in natural waters may originate, for example, from geochemical reactions, industrial waste discharges and past agricultural uses of arsenic-containing pesticides. Because the presence of high levels of arsenic may have carcinogenic and other deleterious effects on living organisms, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization have set the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for arsenic in drinking water at 10 parts per billion (ppb). Arsenic concentrations in wastewaters, groundwaters, surface waters and geothermal waters frequently exceed this level. Thus, the current MCL and any future decreases, which may be to as low as 2.0 ppb, create the need for new techniques to economically and effectively remove arsenic from drinking water, well water and industrial waters.


Arsenic occurs in four oxidation or valence states, i.e., −3, 0, +3, and +5. Under normal conditions arsenic is found dissolved in aqueous or aquatic systems in the +3 and +5 oxidation states, usually in the form of arsenite (AsO2−1) and arsenate (AsO4−3). The effective removal of arsenic by coagulation techniques requires the arsenic to be in the arsenate form. Arsenite, in which the arsenic exists in the +3 oxidation state, is only partially removed by adsorption and coagulation techniques because its main form, arsenious acid (HAsO2), is a weak acid and remains un-ionized at a pH between 5 and 8 where adsorption takes place most effectively.


Various technologies have been used in the past to remove arsenic from aqueous systems. Examples of such techniques include adsorption on high surface area materials, such as alumina and activated carbon, ion exchange with anion exchange resins, co-precipitation and electrodialysis. However, most technologies for arsenic removal are hindered by the difficulty of removing arsenite. The more successful techniques that have been used in large municipal water supplies are not practical for residential applications because of space requirements and the need to use dangerous chemicals. The two most common techniques for residential water treatment have been reverse osmosis and activated alumina. The former method produces arsenic-containing waste streams that must be disposed of, and the latter requires the use of caustic chemicals.


The above facts coupled with the potential for the decrease in MCL to between 2 and 10 ppb make it imperative that effective processes, compositions and devices for removing arsenic from water and other aqueous systems be developed.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the invention, it has now been found that arsenic can be efficiently and effectively removed from water and other aqueous feedstocks by treating the arsenic-containing aqueous feed with a compound containing cerium in the +4 oxidation state, preferably cerium dioxide (CeO2), in order to oxidize the arsenic so that it can be more easily removed by precipitation from the treated aqueous feed to produce a purified aqueous liquid with a reduced concentration of arsenic. “Precipitation” as used herein encompasses not only the removal of arsenic-containing ions in the form of insoluble species, but also includes the immobilization of arsenic-containing ions on or in insoluble particles. In one embodiment of the process of the invention, water or other aqueous liquid containing dissolved arsenic in the +3 and +5 oxidation states is contacted with cerium dioxide to oxidize arsenic in the +3 oxidation state to arsenic in the +5 oxidation state, and the arsenic in the +5 oxidation state is removed from the aqueous liquid by contacting the liquid with a precipitating agent that reacts with the arsenic in the +5 oxidation state to produce insoluble arsenic compounds and an aqueous liquid of reduced arsenic content.


Typically, the oxidized arsenic is in the +5 oxidation state and dissolved in the water or other aqueous liquid in the form of arsenate (AsO4−3). The precipitating agent used to remove the oxidized arsenic from the aqueous liquid can be anything that reacts with the arsenate or other form of oxidized arsenic to produce insoluble arsenic compounds. For example, the precipitating agent can be cerium in the +3 oxidation state produced in the arsenic oxidation step when cerium in the +4 oxidation state is reduced. Alternatively, the precipitating agent can be any particulate solid containing cations in the +3 oxidation state, such as alumina, aluminosilicates, ion exchange resin and clays.


The oxidation and precipitation steps can be carried out in the same or separate zones. If the steps are carried out in the same zone, the compound containing cerium in the +4 oxidation state is usually mixed with the precipitating agent. Although this mixture can be made by supporting the cerium compound on the surface and/or in the pores of the precipitating solids, it is usually preferred that the cerium compound in particulate form be physically mixed with particles of the precipitating agent. A preferred composition of the invention comprises a mixture of cerium dioxide and alumina.


In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, an aqueous liquid containing dissolved arsenic in the form of arsenate and arsenite is contacted with a mixture of cerium dioxide particulates and alumina particulates in an oxidation zone such that the cerium dioxide oxidizes the arsenite to arsenate and the alumina reacts with the arsenate to form insoluble aluminum arsenate that sorbs onto the particles of alumina. The aqueous liquid exiting the oxidation zone contains a substantially reduced concentration of arsenic, usually less than about 2.0 ppb.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Although the process of the invention is primarily envisioned for removing dissolved arsenic from drinking water and groundwater, it will be understood that the process can be used to treat any aqueous liquid feed that contains undesirable amounts of arsenic. Examples of such liquid feeds include, among others, well water, surface waters, such as water from lakes, ponds and wetlands, agricultural waters, wastewater from industrial processes, and geothermal fluids. The arsenic-containing feed can also contain other inorganic contaminants, such as selenium, cadmium, lead and mercury, and certain organic contaminants. Generally, the process of the invention can be used to treat any aqueous liquid feedstock containing more than 2.0 ppb arsenic and is effective for treating feeds containing 30 more than 500 ppb arsenic. The process is effective in decreasing the arsenic levels in such feeds to below 5.0 ppb, usually to below 2.0 ppb.


The arsenic contaminating the aqueous feed is normally dissolved in the aqueous phase and usually exists in both the +3 and +5 oxidation states, respectively, as arsenite (AsO2−1) and arsenate (AsO4−3). Techniques for removing arsenate exist and are quite effective, but removing the arsenite is a more difficult proposition because the present technologies for doing so are not greatly effective. It has now been found that substantially all of the dissolved arsenite can be easily oxidized to arsenate by treating the aqueous feed with cerium in the +4 oxidation state and the resulting arsenate, along with the arsenate originally present in the aqueous feed, precipitated from the treated feed to produce an arsenic-depleted aqueous liquid.


In the process of the invention, the aqueous feed contaminated with arsenic is passed through an inlet into an oxidation vessel at a temperature and pressure, usually ambient conditions, such that the water in the feed remains in the liquid state. If the feed is contaminated with particulate solids, it is usually treated to remove the solids before it is passed into the oxidation vessel. Any liquid-solids separation technique, such as filtration, centrifuging and hydrocycloning, can be used to remove the particulate solids.


In the oxidation vessel the aqueous feed is contacted with a compound containing cerium in the +4 oxidation state (hereinafter referred to as cerium +4), which Ce +4 is an extremely strong oxidizing agent and oxidizes any arsenite or other arsenic present in the +3 oxidation state to arsenate or other species containing arsenic in the +5 oxidation state. All of the arsenic species containing arsenic in the +5 oxidation state is then precipitated from the aqueous phase by contacting the oxidized aqueous feed with a precipitating agent.


The oxidizing agent can be any solid or liquid containing cerium in the +4 oxidation state. Although it is generally preferred to use solid particles of cerium dioxide, which are insoluble in water and relatively attrition resistant as the oxidizing agent, water-soluble cerium compounds can also be used. Examples of such compounds include ceric ammonium nitrate, ceric ammonium sulfate, ceric sulfate, and ceric nitrate.


The precipitating agent that reacts with the arsenate containing arsenic in the +5 oxidation state to form insoluble arsenic compounds can be present in the oxidation vessel with the cerium +4 compound so that the precipitation occurs essentially simultaneously with the oxidation. Alternatively, it can be in a separate vessel into which the treated liquid exiting the oxidation vessel passes. For simplicity purposes, it is normally preferred for both the cerium compound and precipitating agent to be present in the oxidation vessel. This embodiment of the invention eliminates the need for an extra vessel and thereby reduces the cost of installing and operating the process of the invention.


Although the precipitating agent can be any material, solid or liquid, that reacts with arsenate or other species containing arsenic in the +5 oxidation state to form insoluble arsenic compounds, it is usually a particulate solid that contains cations in the +3 oxidation state, which cations react with arsenate to form insoluble arsenate compounds. Examples of such solids containing cations in the +3 oxidation state include alumina, gamma-alumina, activated alumina, acidified alumina such as alumina treated with hydrochloric acid, metal oxides containing labile anions such as aluminum oxychloride, crystalline aluminosilicates such as zeolites, amorphous silica-alumina, ion exchange resins, clays such as montmorillonite, ferric sulfate, porous ceramics, and cerium compounds containing cerium in the +3 oxidation state, such as cerous carbonate. Although lanthanum oxide and other rare earth compounds can be used as the precipitating agent, these materials are typically not employed (except of course for cerium compounds) in the process of the invention because it is preferred to use a precipitating agent that has a much smaller Ksp than that of the rare earth compounds.


As mentioned above it is normally preferable that the cerium +4 compound and precipitating agent both be present in the oxidation vessel so that the arsenic is oxidized and precipitated essentially simultaneously in the same vessel. Although the cerium +4 compound and precipitating agent can both be water-soluble, it is normally preferred that the cerium +4 compound and precipitating agent both be water-insoluble particulate solids that are either slurried with the aqueous feed in the oxidation vessel or physically mixed together in a fixed bed through which the aqueous feed is passed during the oxidation step. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the cerium +4 compound can be deposited on the surface and/or in the pores of the solid precipitating agent. This embodiment is normally not preferred over a physical mixture because supporting the cerium compound on or in the precipitating solids requires the cerium compound to be dissolved in a liquid, the resultant solution mixed with the support solids, and the wet solids dried. Such steps add significantly to the cost of practicing the process of the invention.


Normally, a sufficient amount of the cerium +4 compound is present in the oxidation vessel with the particulate precipitating agent so that the mixture of the two contains between about 8 and 60 weight percent of the cerium +4 compound calculated as the oxide. Preferably, the mixture will contain between about 10 and 50 weight percent, more preferably between about 20 and 30 weight percent, of the cerium +4 compound calculated as the oxide. However, in some instances, it may be desirable for the mixture to contain greater than 40 to 45 weight percent of the cerium +4 compound calculated as the oxide.


Regardless of whether the cerium +4 compound is present in the oxidation vessel in admixture with the particulate precipitating agent or supported on or in the pores of the precipitating agent, the solids will typically range in diameter between about 0.25 and 1.5, preferably from 0.5 to 1.0, millimeters. When the cerium +4 compound and precipitating agent are present in the oxidation zone as a fixed bed, it is normally preferred that the particles be spherical in shape so the flow of 10 the aqueous feed through the bed is evenly distributed. However, if desired, the particles may take other shapes including that of extrudates. Such extrudates would typically have a length between about 0.2 and about 3.0 millimeters.


During the oxidation step of the process of the invention, arsenite in the aqueous feed is oxidized to arsenate according to the following equation:

Ce+4+AsO2−1→Ce+3+AsO4−3

As the cerium +4 oxidizes the arsenite, it is reduced to cerium in the +3 oxidation state, which then reacts with the arsenate formed during the oxidation step to produce insoluble cerium arsenate as shown in the following equation:

Ce+3+AsO4−3→CeAsO4 (solid)


Although theoretically there is enough cerium +3 formed by reduction of cerium +4 to react with all of the arsenate formed in the oxidation reaction to precipitate the arsenate, it is normally preferred that an additional precipitating agent be present. This agent, which can be a compound containing cerium +3, reacts with any unreacted arsenate to form an insoluble precipitate, which is removed from the aqueous feed to produce the desired arsenic-depleted aqueous liquid.


The oxidation step that takes place in the oxidation vessel is normally carried out at ambient pressure, at a temperature from about 4° to 100° C., preferably from about 5° to 40° C., and at a pH greater than about 3.0. The residence time of the aqueous feed in the oxidation vessel typically ranges from about 2.0 to about 30 minutes. When the cerium +4 compound and arsenic precipitant are both solid particulates and present together as a fixed bed in the oxidation vessel, 10 the precipitated arsenic compounds will be sorbed by or otherwise associated with the solid particles of the precipitating agent so that the aqueous fluid exiting the oxidation vessel will contain essentially no solids and very little arsenic, usually less than about 10 ppb and quite frequently less than 2.0 ppb. If the precipitating agent is not in the oxidation vessel, the effluent from the vessel is passed to another vessel where it is treated separately with the arsenic precipitating agent. Finally, if the cerium +4 compound and precipitating agent are particulate solids that are slurried with the aqueous feed in the oxidation vessel, the effluent from the vessel is normally treated to separate the solids, including the insoluble arsenic compounds formed in the vessel, from the arsenic-depleted liquid. Although the separation can be carried out in any type of device capable of removing particulates from liquids, a filtration system is typically employed.


If the aqueous feed to the process of the invention contains other contaminants that must be removed in addition to arsenic to produce the desired purified aqueous product, the removal of these contaminants is typically carried either before or after the oxidation step. If the other contaminants will interfere with the oxidation of the arsenic, they should be removed prior to the oxidation step. In some cases the process of the invention is also effective for removing other contaminants from the aqueous feed in addition to or to the exclusion of arsenic.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, an arsenic purifying device containing a cartridge or filter is used to treat residential drinking water. The treating device can be a free standing container with a filtering device containing the composition of the invention or a cartridge type device designed to fit under a sink. These devices are situated so that the water entering the home or business location passes through the filter or cartridge before it enters the sink faucet. The filter and cartridge devices are quite simple and comprise a inlet attached to the source of the drinking water, a filter or cartridge containing the cerium +4 oxidizing agent, usually in the form of a fixed bed and in admixture with an arsenic precipitant, and an outlet in communication with the sink faucet to direct the arsenic-depleted drinking water exiting the cartridge or filter to the entrance of the faucet. Alternatively, a cartridge or filter type device can be designed to fit onto the faucet so that water exiting the faucet passes through the cartridge or filter device before it is consumed.


In the filter or cartridge, arsenic in the +3 oxidation state is oxidized to arsenic in the +5 oxidation state, and substantially all of the dissolved arsenic +5 present reacts with cerium in the +3 oxidation state and the arsenic precipitating agent to form insoluble arsenic compounds that are sorbed onto the fixed bed solids. The precipitating agent is preferably alumina or an ion exchange resin. The effluent exiting the fixed bed and the outlet of the cartridge or filter device will typically have an arsenic concentration less than about 2.0 ppb. After the fixed bed in one of the cartridge or filter devices becomes saturated with arsenic, the cartridge or filter is replaced with a new cartridge or filter of the same or similar design. The spent cartridge or filter is then disposed of in a legally approved manner.


In another embodiment, the process of the invention is used in community water treatment facilities to remove arsenic from drinking water before the water is distributed to local homes and businesses. For such use the cerium +4 oxidizing agent is typically present in large tanks in either slurry form or in a fixed bed so that relatively large amounts of arsenic-containing water can be treated either in a continuous or batch mode. The arsenic precipitant can be present either in the tank with the cerium +4 oxidizing agent or in a separate vessel fed by the effluent from the tank. The water exiting the process typically has an arsenic concentration less than about 10 ppb, usually less than 5.0 ppb, and preferably less than 2.0 ppb.


The nature and objects of the invention are further illustrated by the following example, which is provided for illustrative purposes only and not to limit the invention as defined by the claims. The example shows that arsenic in the +3 and +5 oxidation state can be completely removed from water using cerium dioxide.


EXAMPLE

Test solutions were prepared to mimic arsenic containing groundwater by mixing certified standard solutions of arsenic in the +3 and +5 oxidation states with tap water containing no arsenic. Twenty grams of lanthanum oxide (La2O3), 20 grams of cerium dioxide (CeO2), and a mixture of 10 grams of lanthanum oxide and 10 grams of cerium dioxide were separately placed in a sealed 100 milliliter glass container and slurried with about 96 milliliters of test solutions containing 100 ppb of arsenic +3, 100 ppb of arsenic +5, and 50 ppb of both arsenic +3 and arsenic +5. The resultant slurries were agitated with Teflon coated magnetic stir bar for 15 minutes. After agitation, the tap water was separated from the solids by filtration through Whatman #41 filter paper and sealed in 125 milliliter plastic sample bottles. The bottles were then sent to a certified drinking water analysis laboratory where the amount of arsenic in each sample was determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy. The results of these tests are set forth below in Table 1.














TABLE 1









Arsenic






in Water

Arsenic in



Before Test
Slurried
Water After
Arsenic












Test
ppb
ppb
Material
Test
Removed


No.
As+3
As+5
percent
ppb
percent















1
0
0
0
0
NA


2
50
50
0
100
0


3
50
50
100% La2O3
45
55


4
50
50
100% CeO2
0
100


5
50
50
 50% La2O3
0
100





 50% CeO2


6
100
0
 50% La2O3
0
100





 50% CeO2


7
0
100
 50% La2O3
0
100





 50% CeO2


8
0
0
 50% La2O3
0
NA





 50% CeO2









The data for test 3 in the table show that, when lanthanum oxide is used by itself, only 55 percent of the arsenic present in the arsenic-spiked tap water is removed. Since the solubility of lanthanum arsenate, which contains arsenic +5, is very small, it was assumed that the arsenic remaining in solution was primarily arsenic +3 in the form of arsenite. The results of test 4, on the other hand, show that cerium dioxide can remove all of the arsenic from the water. The disparity in these results is attributed to the fact that cerium exists in the +4 oxidation state in cerium dioxide and is a strong oxidizing agent, whereas the lanthanum in the lanthanum oxide, which is in the +3 oxidation state, is not an oxidizing agent. Although the lanthanum +3 reacts with arsenic in the +5 oxidation state to precipitate it from the water, the lanthanum does not react with the arsenic in the +3 oxidation state. The cerium in the cerium dioxide oxidizes the arsenic +3 to arsenic +5, which then reacts with cerium +3 formed by the reduction of cerium +4 to precipitate all of the arsenic dissolved in the water. Tests 5-7 show that equal mixtures of cerium dioxide and lanthanum oxide are also effective in removing all of the arsenic from the tap water.


Although this invention has been described by reference to several embodiments of the invention, it is evident that many alterations, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace within the invention all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A device, comprising: an inlet to receive an arsenic-containing aqueous feed;an outlet to discharge an arsenic-depleted treated aqueous feed; andat least one of a filter and cartridge positioned so that the arsenic-containing aqueous feed passes from the inlet and through the at least one of a filter and cartridge to produce the arsenic-depleted treated aqueous feed for discharge through the outlet, wherein the at least one of a filter and cartridge comprises a cerium (IV) oxide to react with arsenic in the arsenic-containing aqueous feed and a cerium precipitating agent to form a precipitate with the arsenic.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of a filter and cartridge is removable from the device and replaceable with a new at least one of a filter and cartridge, wherein the arsenic-containing aqueous feed is water, wherein the arsenic-containing water is contaminated with dissolved arsenic in the +3 oxidation state, wherein the cerium (IV) oxide oxidizes the arsenic to the +5 oxidation state, wherein the precipitating agent comprises cerium, wherein the cerium precipitating agent forms a precipitate with the arsenic in the +5 oxidation state, and wherein the arsenic-depleted treated aqueous feed comprises less than about 2.0 ppb dissolved arsenic.
  • 3. The device of claim 1, wherein the precipitating agent comprises cerous carbonate.
  • 4. The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of a filter and cartridge further comprises at least one cerium compound selected from the group consisting of ceric ammonium nitrate, ceric ammonium sulfate, ceric sulfate, ceric nitrate, and mixtures thereof.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, wherein the cerium (IV) oxide and precipitating agent are supported on a substrate selected from the group consisting of alumina, gamma-alumina, activated alumina, acidified alumina, metal oxides comprising labile anions, crystalline alumino-silicates, amorphous silica alumina, ion exchange resins, clays, ferric sulfate, porous ceramics, and mixtures thereof.
  • 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of a filter and cartridge comprises from about 8 to about 60 wt. % of the cerium (IV) oxide.
  • 7. The device of claim 1, wherein the arsenic-containing aqueous feed comprises a further contaminant selected from the group consisting of selenium, cadmium, lead, mercury, and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. The device of claim 1, wherein the arsenic-containing aqueous feed further comprises an organic contaminant.
  • 9. The system of claim 7, further comprising: a further contaminant removal stage for removing the further contaminant, the further contaminant removal stage being positioned upstream of the at least one of a filter and cartridge.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, further comprising: an organic contaminant removal stage for removing the organic contaminant, the organic contaminant removal stage being positioned upstream of the at least one of a filter and cartridge.
  • 11. A system, comprising: an inlet for an arsenic-containing aqueous feed, the aqueous feed comprising particulate solids;a liquid-solids separator to remove the particulate solids from the aqueous feed and form a liquid phase and solid phase, the liquid phase comprising the arsenic and the solid phase comprising the particulate solids; andan oxidation vessel comprising a cerium (IV) oxide to react with the arsenic to a higher oxidation state and a precipitating agent to form a precipitate with the arsenic in the higher oxidation state.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the precipitating agent comprises cerium, wherein the aqueous feed is water, wherein the oxidation vessel outputs an arsenic-depleted water, wherein the arsenic-containing water is contaminated with more than about 500 ppb dissolved arsenic in the +3 oxidation state, wherein the cerium (IV) oxide oxidizes the arsenic to the +5 oxidation state, and wherein the arsenic-depleted water comprises less than about 5.0 ppb dissolved arsenic.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the aqueous feed is water and the oxidation vessel further comprises a cerium compound selected from the group consisting of ceric ammonium nitrate, cerium dioxide, ceric ammonium sulfate, ceric sulfate, ceric nitrate, and mixtures thereof.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the aqueous feed is water, wherein the precipitating agent comprises cerous carbonate, and wherein the composition comprises from about 8 to about 60 wt. % of the cerium (IV) oxide in the form of an oxide.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the aqueous feed is water and wherein the arsenic-containing feed comprises a further contaminant selected from the group consisting of selenium, cadmium, lead, mercury, and mixtures thereof.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the arsenic-containing aqueous feed comprises an organic contaminant.
  • 17. The system of claim 11, wherein the arsenic-containing aqueous feed is water and wherein the cerium (IV) oxide and precipitating agent are substantially insoluble in water.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the cerium (IV) oxide and precipitating agent are unsupported.
  • 19. The system of claim 17, wherein the cerium (IV) oxide and precipitating agent are supported on a substrate selected from the group consisting of alumina, gamma-alumina, activated alumina, acidified alumina, metal oxides comprising labile anions, crystalline alumino-silicates, amorphous silica alumina, ion exchange resins, clays, ferric sulfate, porous ceramics, and mixtures thereof.
  • 20. The system of claim 11, wherein the precipitating agent is substantially dissolved in water and wherein the arsenic-containing aqueous feed comprises water.
  • 21. The system of claim 15, further comprising: a further contaminant removal stage for removing the further contaminant, the further contaminant removal stage being positioned upstream of the oxidation vessel.
  • 22. The system of claim 15, further comprising: an organic contaminant removal stage for removing the organic contaminant, the organic contaminant removal stage being positioned upstream of the oxidation vessel.
  • 23. A system, comprising: an input for an aqueous feed contaminated with both arsenite comprising arsenic (III) and arsenate comprising arsenic (V) and a further contaminant that is at least one of selenium, cadmium, lead, mercury, and an organic contaminant;at least one of a bed, filter, and cartridge, the at least one of a bed, filter, and cartridge comprising cerium (IV) oxide and an arsenic precipitating agent to remove both the arsenite and arsenate from the aqueous feed, wherein the precipitating agent comprises a rare earth having a trivalent oxidation state; anda contaminant removal stage, positioned upstream of the at least one of a bed, filter, and cartridge, for removing the at least one of selenium, cadmium, lead, mercury, and an organic contaminant.
  • 24. The system of claim 23, wherein the at least one of a rare earth-containing bed, filter, and cartridge comprises cerium (IV) and wherein the cerium (IV) oxidizes the arsenic (III) to arsenic (V).
  • 25. The system of claim 24, wherein the at least one of a bed, filter, and cartridge is removable from the system and replaceable with a new at least one of a bed, filter, and cartridge, and wherein the at least one of a bed, filter, and cartridge, and wherein the precipitating agent is at least one of cerium (III), lanthanum oxide, and other rare earth compounds.
  • 26. The system of claim 25, wherein the system outputs a purified water stream, wherein the precipitating agent comprises cerium (III), wherein the cerium precipitating agent forms a compound with the arsenic (V), and wherein the purified water stream comprises less than about 2.0 ppb dissolved total arsenic.
  • 27. The system of claim 25, wherein the precipitating agent comprises cerous carbonate.
  • 28. The system of claim 25, wherein the cerium (IV) oxide and arsenic precipitating agent are supported on a substrate selected from the group consisting of alumina, gamma-alumina, activated alumina, acidified alumina, metal oxides comprising labile anions, crystalline alumino-silicates, amorphous silica alumina, ion exchange resins, clays, ferric sulfate, porous ceramics, and mixtures thereof.
  • 29. The system of claim 23, wherein the at least one of a bed, filter and cartridge comprises from about 8 to about 60 wt. % of the cerium in the form of an oxide.
  • 30. The system of claim 23, wherein the aqueous feed comprises at least one of selenium, cadmium, lead, and mercury.
  • 31. The system of claim 23, wherein the aqueous feed comprises the organic contaminant.
  • 32. A device for removing arsenic from drinking water comprising: (a) an inlet communicating with a source of said drinking water having a first arsenic concentration comprising arsenite and arsenate;(b) a vessel containing a cerium-containing compound and a particulate arsenic precipitating agent, said cerium-containing compound comprises cerium dioxide (CeO2) having cerium in a +4 oxidation state, said cerium +4 reacts with said arsenite, said arsenite precipitating agent comprising a rare earth having a +3 oxidation state, and said particulate arsenic precipitating agent forms an insoluble arsenic compound with said arsenate, said cerium-containing compound and said particulate arsenic precipitating agent combined have greater than about 40 to about 45 cerium +4 calculated as an oxide, said vessel having an entry portion and an exit portion, wherein said entry portion communicates with the inlet; and(c) an outlet communicating with said exit portion of the vessel, wherein said drinking water leaves said vessel through said exit portion and wherein said drinking water exiting said exit portion has a second arsenic concentration less than said first arsenic concentration.
  • 33. The device of claim 32, wherein said vessel comprises a cartridge or filter containing said cerium dioxide, wherein said vessel comprises a cartridge or filter containing said particulate arsenic precipitating agent having +3 cations, wherein said cerium dioxide is a water-insoluble particulate solid, and wherein said outlet is in communication with a sink faucet.
  • 34. The device of claim 32, wherein said vessel comprises a tank containing said cerium dioxide (CeO2).
  • 35. The device of claim 32, wherein said cerium-containing compound is a water-insoluble particulate solid and is present in step (a) as a slurry or as a fixed bed, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent comprises a particulate solid containing cations having a +3 oxidation state, wherein said steps (a) and (b) are carried out in one of a single zone or a separate zone, wherein said cerium-containing compound is supported on or in pores of said arsenic precipitating agent and wherein said purified aqueous liquid has an arsenic content of less than about 2 ppb.
  • 36. The device of claim 32, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises a rare earth compound other than cerium.
  • 37. The device of claim 32, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises lanthanum oxide.
  • 38. The device of claim 32, wherein said aqueous feed containing arsenic has another contaminant that interferes with said reaction of said cerium-containing compound with said arsenic, wherein said another contaminant is removed upstream of said vessel, wherein said another contaminant comprises one or more of selenium, cadmium, lead, mercury or an organic contaminant, and wherein said another contaminants is removed in addition to arsenic.
  • 39. The device of claim 32, wherein said cerium-containing compound comprises particles and wherein said cerium-containing particles comprise an extrudate having a length from about 0.2 to about 3.0 millimeters.
  • 40. The device of claim 32, wherein said rare earth in said precipitating agent comprises cerium in the +3 oxidation sate, wherein said drinking water has an arsenic content of less than about 5 ppb and wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises one of alumina, ion exchange resins, crystalline aluminosilicates, clays and porous ceramics.
  • 41. The device of claim 32, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises alumina and wherein said cerium-containing compound is supported on or in pores of said arsenic precipitating agent.
  • 42. The device of claim 32, wherein said vessel comprises a cartridge or filter containing said particulate arsenic precipitating agent comprising cerium +3.
  • 43. A device for removing arsenic from drinking water comprising: (a) an inlet communicating with a source of said drinking water having a first arsenic concentration comprising arsenite and arsenate;(b) a vessel containing a cerium-containing compound and a particulate arsenic precipitating agent, said cerium-containing compound comprising cerium dioxide (CeO2) having cerium in a +4 oxidation state, said cerium +4 reacts with said arsenite, and said particulate arsenic precipitating agent comprises a rare earth compound other than a cerium compound and forms an insoluble arsenic compound with said arsenate, said cerium-containing compound and said particulate arsenic precipitation agent combined having greater than about 40 to about 45cerium +4 calculated as an oxide, said vessel having an entry portion and an exit portion, wherein said entry portion communicates with the inlet; and(c) an outlet communicating with said exit portion of the vessel, wherein said drinking water leaves said vessel through said exit portion and wherein said drinking water exiting said exit portion has a second arsenic concentration less than said first arsenic concentration.
  • 44. The device of claim 43, wherein vessel comprises a cartridge or filter containing said cerium dioxide (CeO2), wherein said cerium dioxide is a water-insoluble particulate solid, and said outlet is in communication with a sink.
  • 45. The device of claim 43, wherein said vessel comprises a tank containing cerium dioxide (CeO2).
  • 46. The device of claim 43, wherein said cerium-containing compound is a water-insoluble particulate solid and is present in step (a) as a slurry or as a fixed bed, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent comprises a particulate solid containing cations having a +3 oxidation state, wherein said steps (a) and (b) are carried out in one of a single zone or a separate zone, wherein said cerium-containing compound is supported on or in pores of said arsenic precipitating agent and wherein said drinking water has an arsenic content of less than about 2 ppb.
  • 47. The device of claim 43, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises rare earth compounds other than cerium.
  • 48. The device of claim 43, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises lanthanum oxide.
  • 49. The device of claim 43, wherein said aqueous feed containing arsenic has another contaminant that interferes with said reaction of said cerium-containing compound with said arsenic, wherein said another contaminant is removed upstream of said vessel, wherein said another contaminant comprises one or more of selenium, cadmium, lead, mercury or an organic contaminant, wherein said another contaminants is removed in addition to arsenic and wherein said another contaminant is removed either before or after said step (a).
  • 50. The device of claim 43, wherein said cerium-containing compound comprises particles and wherein said cerium-containing particles comprise an extrudate having a length from about 0.2 to about 3.0 millimeters.
  • 51. The device of claim 43, wherein said drinking water has an arsenic content of less than about 5 ppb and wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises one of alumina, ion exchange resins, crystalline aluminosilicates, clays and porous ceramics.
  • 52. The device of claim 43, wherein said arsenic precipitating agent further comprises alumina.
  • 53. The device of claim 43, wherein said vessel comprises a cartridge or filter containing said particulate arsenic precipitating agent comprising cerium +3.
  • 54. A system, comprising: an inlet for an aqueous feed comprising dissolved arsenic in the +3 and +5 oxidation states as arsenite and arsenate, respectively;at least one of a cerium-containing bed, filter, and cartridge to contact a mixture comprising cerium in the +4 oxidation state and lanthanum in the +3 oxidation state with the aqueous feed to remove the dissolved arsenic in the +3 and +5 oxidation states from the aqueous feed and form a treated aqueous feed; andan outlet for the treated aqueous feed.
  • 55. The device of claim 54, wherein the at least one of a cerium-containing bed, filter, and cartridge is a removable cartridge or filter comprising the mixture, and wherein the aqueous feed comprises particulate solids, and further comprising: a liquid-solids separator to remove the particulate solids and form a liquid phase and solid phase, the liquid phase comprising the dissolved arsenic and the solid phase comprising the particulate solids.
  • 56. The device of claim 54, wherein the mixture is supported on a particulate solid containing +3 cations and wherein the mixture comprises between about 8 to about 60 weight percent of the cerium in the +4 oxidation state calculated as an oxide.
  • 57. The device of claim 56, wherein the particulate solid is one or more of alumina, gamma-alumina, activated alumina, acidified alumina, metal oxides containing labile anions, an aluminosilicate, amorphous silica alumina, ferric sulfate, a porous ceramic, an ion exchange resin, and a clay.
  • 58. The device of claim 54, wherein the mixture contains greater than 40 to 45 weight percent of the cerium +4 compound calculated as an oxide.
  • 59. The device of claim 54, wherein the cerium +4 comprises cerium dioxide and the lanthanum is in the form of lanthanum (III) oxide.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/925,247, filed Oct. 26, 2007, which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/435,697, filed May 16, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,589, which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/029,257, filed Jan. 5, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,048,853, which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/353,705, filed Jan. 29, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,863,825, each of which are incorporated fully herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (541)
Number Name Date Kind
1739840 Kendall Dec 1929 A
2564241 Warf Aug 1951 A
2567661 Ayres Sep 1951 A
2647858 Weisz Aug 1953 A
2847332 Ramadanoff Aug 1958 A
2872286 Finzel Feb 1959 A
3194629 Dreibelbis et al. Jul 1965 A
3259568 Jordan et al. Jul 1966 A
3337452 Ringel et al. Aug 1967 A
3347786 Baer et al. Oct 1967 A
3385915 Hamling May 1968 A
3575853 Gaughan et al. Apr 1971 A
3617569 Daniels et al. Nov 1971 A
3658724 Stiles Apr 1972 A
3692671 Recht et al. Sep 1972 A
3736255 Ghassemi et al. May 1973 A
3753686 Wilder et al. Aug 1973 A
3761571 Woodhead Sep 1973 A
3768989 Goetzinger et al. Oct 1973 A
3838759 Schmoelz et al. Oct 1974 A
3849537 Allgulin Nov 1974 A
3865728 Abbott et al. Feb 1975 A
3916585 Barks Nov 1975 A
3926807 Evers et al. Dec 1975 A
3956118 Kleber et al. May 1976 A
3965118 Van Rheenen Jun 1976 A
4001375 Longo Jan 1977 A
4046687 Schulze Sep 1977 A
4054516 Izumi et al. Oct 1977 A
4059520 Roller Nov 1977 A
4078058 Fox Mar 1978 A
4088754 Monafo May 1978 A
4094777 Sugier et al. Jun 1978 A
4096064 Du Fresne Jun 1978 A
4101631 Ambrosini et al. Jul 1978 A
4127644 Norman et al. Nov 1978 A
4145282 Bruckenstein Mar 1979 A
4200609 Byrd Apr 1980 A
4230682 Bamberger Oct 1980 A
4231893 Woodhead Nov 1980 A
4251496 Longo et al. Feb 1981 A
4313925 Bamberger Feb 1982 A
4346063 Cahn et al. Aug 1982 A
4386063 Boden May 1983 A
4404197 Fox et al. Sep 1983 A
4433196 Yang et al. Feb 1984 A
4436655 Masotti et al. Mar 1984 A
4474580 MacKenzie et al. Oct 1984 A
4474896 Chao Oct 1984 A
4477315 Tomaszewski Oct 1984 A
4498706 Ilardi et al. Feb 1985 A
4507206 Hughes Mar 1985 A
4566975 Allgulin Jan 1986 A
4581229 Petrow Apr 1986 A
4585583 Roberson et al. Apr 1986 A
4588088 Allen May 1986 A
4596659 Nomura et al. Jun 1986 A
4622149 Devuyst et al. Nov 1986 A
4636289 Mani et al. Jan 1987 A
4652054 Copenhafer et al. Mar 1987 A
4661330 Chane-ching et al. Apr 1987 A
4714694 Wan et al. Dec 1987 A
4738799 Troy Apr 1988 A
4753728 VanderBilt et al. Jun 1988 A
4786483 Audeh Nov 1988 A
4814152 Yan Mar 1989 A
4818483 Culling Apr 1989 A
4828832 De Cuellar et al. May 1989 A
4831519 Morton May 1989 A
4842898 Gradeff Jun 1989 A
4843102 Horton Jun 1989 A
4849223 Pratt Jul 1989 A
4859432 David et al. Aug 1989 A
4861519 Tusa et al. Aug 1989 A
4881176 Kononov Nov 1989 A
4881976 Gradeff Nov 1989 A
4889771 Gradeff et al. Dec 1989 A
4891067 Rappas et al. Jan 1990 A
4902426 Macedo et al. Feb 1990 A
4917875 Moore et al. Apr 1990 A
4920195 Kankare et al. Apr 1990 A
4935146 O'Neill et al. Jun 1990 A
4946592 Galaj et al. Aug 1990 A
4968322 Miyawaki et al. Nov 1990 A
4973501 Gradeff Nov 1990 A
4997425 Shioya et al. Mar 1991 A
4999174 Wilson et al. Mar 1991 A
5004711 Grodek Apr 1991 A
5013534 Dissaux et al. May 1991 A
5017532 Sonnenberg et al. May 1991 A
5024769 Gallup Jun 1991 A
5028736 Girrbach et al. Jul 1991 A
5043072 Hitotsuyanagi et al. Aug 1991 A
5053139 Dodwell et al. Oct 1991 A
5061560 Tajima et al. Oct 1991 A
5064628 Chane-ching et al. Nov 1991 A
5066758 Honel et al. Nov 1991 A
5080926 Porter et al. Jan 1992 A
5082570 Higgins et al. Jan 1992 A
5104660 Chvapil et al. Apr 1992 A
5116418 Kaliski May 1992 A
5116620 Chvapil et al. May 1992 A
5126116 Krause et al. Jun 1992 A
5133948 King et al. Jul 1992 A
5145587 Ishii et al. Sep 1992 A
5152936 Tajima et al. Oct 1992 A
5161385 Schumacher Nov 1992 A
5178768 White, Jr. Jan 1993 A
5192452 Mitsui et al. Mar 1993 A
5207877 Weinberg et al. May 1993 A
5207995 Bosserman May 1993 A
5213779 Kay et al. May 1993 A
5227168 Chvapil et al. Jul 1993 A
5236595 Wang et al. Aug 1993 A
5238488 Wilhelm Aug 1993 A
5248398 Cordani Sep 1993 A
5260066 Wood et al. Nov 1993 A
5281253 Thompson Jan 1994 A
5326737 Kay et al. Jul 1994 A
5328669 Han et al. Jul 1994 A
5330770 Kuno Jul 1994 A
5338460 Yen Aug 1994 A
5344479 Kerfoot et al. Sep 1994 A
5348662 Yen et al. Sep 1994 A
5352365 Fuller Oct 1994 A
5356437 Pedersen et al. Oct 1994 A
5358643 Mcclintock Oct 1994 A
5368703 Brewster Nov 1994 A
5389352 Wang Feb 1995 A
5403495 Kust et al. Apr 1995 A
5409522 Durham et al. Apr 1995 A
5422489 Bhargava Jun 1995 A
5422907 Bhargava Jun 1995 A
5433931 Bosserman Jul 1995 A
5446286 Bhargava Aug 1995 A
5455489 Bhargava Oct 1995 A
5500198 Liu et al. Mar 1996 A
5505766 Chang Apr 1996 A
5529811 Sinko Jun 1996 A
5545604 Demmel Aug 1996 A
5551976 Allen Sep 1996 A
5556545 Volchek et al. Sep 1996 A
5575915 Nakamura et al. Nov 1996 A
5575919 Santina Nov 1996 A
5580535 Hoke et al. Dec 1996 A
5603838 Misra et al. Feb 1997 A
5611934 Shepperd, III et al. Mar 1997 A
5618406 Demmel Apr 1997 A
5637258 Goldburt et al. Jun 1997 A
5649894 White et al. Jul 1997 A
5660802 Archer et al. Aug 1997 A
5683953 Mills Nov 1997 A
5688378 Khoe et al. Nov 1997 A
5689038 Bartram et al. Nov 1997 A
5698212 Hagiwara Dec 1997 A
5702592 Suri et al. Dec 1997 A
5711930 Albers et al. Jan 1998 A
5712218 Chopin et al. Jan 1998 A
5712219 Klabunde et al. Jan 1998 A
5728404 Von Rheinbaben et al. Mar 1998 A
5730995 Shirono et al. Mar 1998 A
5759855 Pierschbacher et al. Jun 1998 A
5759939 Klabunde et al. Jun 1998 A
5783057 Tomita et al. Jul 1998 A
5795836 Jin et al. Aug 1998 A
5820966 Krause et al. Oct 1998 A
5833841 Koslowsky Nov 1998 A
5859064 Cronce Jan 1999 A
5876610 Clack et al. Mar 1999 A
5897675 Mangold et al. Apr 1999 A
5897781 Dourdeville Apr 1999 A
5897784 Mills Apr 1999 A
5910253 Fuerstenau et al. Jun 1999 A
5914287 Saito Jun 1999 A
5914436 Klabunde et al. Jun 1999 A
5918555 Winegar Jul 1999 A
5922926 Back et al. Jul 1999 A
5928504 Hembre et al. Jul 1999 A
5938837 Hanawa et al. Aug 1999 A
5939087 Hagiwara Aug 1999 A
5952665 Bhargava Sep 1999 A
5976383 Guess et al. Nov 1999 A
5990373 Klabunde Nov 1999 A
5994260 Bonneau Nov 1999 A
6001152 Sinha Dec 1999 A
6001157 Nogami Dec 1999 A
6017553 Burrell et al. Jan 2000 A
6030537 Shaniuk et al. Feb 2000 A
6036886 Chhabra et al. Mar 2000 A
6045925 Klabunde et al. Apr 2000 A
6048821 Demmel et al. Apr 2000 A
6057488 Koper et al. May 2000 A
6059978 Pacifi et al. May 2000 A
6087294 Klabunde et al. Jul 2000 A
6093236 Klabunde et al. Jul 2000 A
6093325 Stone Jul 2000 A
6093328 Santina Jul 2000 A
6099819 Srinivas et al. Aug 2000 A
6114038 Castro et al. Sep 2000 A
6132623 Nikolaidis et al. Oct 2000 A
6136749 Gadkaree et al. Oct 2000 A
6143318 Gilchrist et al. Nov 2000 A
6146539 Mills Nov 2000 A
6177015 Blakey et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180016 Johnston et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187192 Johnston et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187205 Martin et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197201 Misra et al. Mar 2001 B1
6197204 Heskett Mar 2001 B1
6200482 Winchester et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203709 Min et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214238 Gallup Apr 2001 B1
6221118 Yoshida et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221602 Barbera-Guillem et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221903 Courchesne Apr 2001 B1
6224898 Balogh et al. May 2001 B1
6238566 Yoshida et al. May 2001 B1
6238686 Burrell et al. May 2001 B1
6248605 Harkonen et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258334 Gadkaree et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264841 Tudor Jul 2001 B1
6294006 Andou Sep 2001 B1
6299851 Li et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300640 Bhargava et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312604 Denkewicz et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319108 Adefris et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326326 Feng et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328779 He et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338800 Kulperger et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341567 Robertson et al. Jan 2002 B1
6342163 DeLonge et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350383 Douglas Feb 2002 B1
6351932 Hummel Mar 2002 B1
6361824 Yekimov et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368510 Friot Apr 2002 B2
6372003 Kasai et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375834 Guess et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383273 Kepner et al. May 2002 B1
6383395 Clarke et al. May 2002 B1
6391207 Cluyse May 2002 B1
6391869 Parks et al. May 2002 B1
6395659 Seto et al. May 2002 B2
6395736 Parks et al. May 2002 B1
6403653 Hobson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406676 Sundkvist Jun 2002 B1
6410603 Hobson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6417423 Koper et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420434 Braue et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428705 Allen et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440300 Randall et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444143 Bawendi et al. Sep 2002 B2
6452184 Taskar et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460535 Nisewander et al. Oct 2002 B1
6461535 de Esparza Oct 2002 B1
6468499 Balachandran et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475451 Leppin et al. Nov 2002 B1
6524487 Kulperger et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524540 Heinig Feb 2003 B1
6528451 Brezny et al. Mar 2003 B2
6536672 Outwater Mar 2003 B1
6537382 Bartram et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542487 Ishii et al. Apr 2003 B1
6542540 Leung et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551514 Misra et al. Apr 2003 B1
6562092 Ito et al. May 2003 B1
6562403 Klabunde et al. May 2003 B2
6569224 Kerfoot et al. May 2003 B2
6569393 Hoke et al. May 2003 B1
6569490 Yadav et al. May 2003 B2
6572672 Yadav et al. Jun 2003 B2
6576092 Granite et al. Jun 2003 B2
6585787 Yamasaki et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589496 Yabe et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599428 Douglas Jul 2003 B1
6599429 Azizian Jul 2003 B1
6602111 Fujie et al. Aug 2003 B1
6602671 Bawendi et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610264 Buchanan et al. Aug 2003 B1
6613230 Krulik et al. Sep 2003 B2
6623642 Robertson Sep 2003 B2
6627632 Parks et al. Sep 2003 B2
6653519 Koper et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666903 Green Dec 2003 B1
6680211 Barbera-Guillem et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689178 Ito et al. Feb 2004 B2
6706082 Ota et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706195 Jensen et al. Mar 2004 B2
6716895 Terry Apr 2004 B1
6719828 Lovell et al. Apr 2004 B1
6723349 Hill et al. Apr 2004 B1
6740141 Espin et al. May 2004 B2
6770483 Lyon Aug 2004 B2
6774361 Bawendi et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780332 Shiau et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790363 Vempati Sep 2004 B2
6790420 Breen et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790521 Taketomi et al. Sep 2004 B1
6800204 Harck et al. Oct 2004 B2
6808692 Oehr Oct 2004 B2
6821414 Johnson et al. Nov 2004 B1
6821434 Moore et al. Nov 2004 B1
6824690 Zhao et al. Nov 2004 B1
6827766 Carnes et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833123 Huang et al. Dec 2004 B2
6843617 Chowdhury et al. Jan 2005 B2
6843919 Klabunde et al. Jan 2005 B2
6843923 Morton Jan 2005 B2
6846432 Mills Jan 2005 B2
6849187 Shaniuk Feb 2005 B2
6852903 Brown et al. Feb 2005 B1
6855665 Blake et al. Feb 2005 B1
6858147 Dukhin et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860924 Rajagopalan et al. Mar 2005 B2
6861002 Hughes Mar 2005 B2
6862825 Lowndes Mar 2005 B1
6863825 Witham et al. Mar 2005 B2
6864213 Labarge et al. Mar 2005 B2
6881424 Kemp et al. Apr 2005 B1
6881766 Hain Apr 2005 B2
6883825 Schneider Apr 2005 B2
6887302 Rajagopalan et al. May 2005 B2
6887566 Hung et al. May 2005 B1
6896809 Qian et al. May 2005 B2
6901684 Ito et al. Jun 2005 B2
6905527 Ito et al. Jun 2005 B2
6905698 Aldcroft et al. Jun 2005 B1
6908560 Guter Jun 2005 B2
6908570 Green Jun 2005 B2
6908628 Herruzo Jun 2005 B2
6914034 Vo Jul 2005 B2
6919029 Meng et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921739 Smith et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927501 Baarman et al. Aug 2005 B2
6942840 Broderick Sep 2005 B1
6946076 Mills Sep 2005 B2
6946578 Nakano et al. Sep 2005 B2
6957743 Johnston et al. Oct 2005 B2
6960329 Sellakumar Nov 2005 B2
6974564 Biermann et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977039 Knoll et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986798 Bessho et al. Jan 2006 B2
6987129 Mak et al. Jan 2006 B2
6998080 Stadermann et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008559 Chen Mar 2006 B2
7014782 D'Emidio et al. Mar 2006 B2
7025800 Campbell et al. Apr 2006 B2
7029516 Campbell et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033419 Granite et al. Apr 2006 B1
RE39098 Klabunde et al. May 2006 E
7037480 Bhinde May 2006 B2
7048853 Witham et al. May 2006 B2
7048860 Oishi May 2006 B2
7049382 Haftka et al. May 2006 B2
7056454 Fujino Jun 2006 B2
7060233 Srinivas et al. Jun 2006 B1
7067294 Singh et al. Jun 2006 B2
7074336 Teter et al. Jul 2006 B1
7078071 Taketomi et al. Jul 2006 B2
7081428 Thampi Jul 2006 B1
7083730 Davis Aug 2006 B2
7094383 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101415 Torres et al. Sep 2006 B2
7101493 Colucci Sep 2006 B2
7112237 Zeller et al. Sep 2006 B2
7129684 Park Oct 2006 B2
7141227 Chan Nov 2006 B2
7156888 Mochizuki Jan 2007 B2
7156994 Archer Jan 2007 B1
7160505 Belbachir et al. Jan 2007 B2
7179849 Terry Feb 2007 B2
7183235 Lovell et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186671 Smith et al. Mar 2007 B2
7192602 Fechner et al. Mar 2007 B2
7211320 Cooper et al. May 2007 B1
7214836 Brown et al. May 2007 B2
7241629 Dejneka et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250174 Lee et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252694 Woo et al. Aug 2007 B2
7252769 Dickinson Aug 2007 B2
7256049 Bennett et al. Aug 2007 B2
7264670 Ruger et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276640 Mulukutla et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279129 Lanz et al. Oct 2007 B2
7282153 Barrett et al. Oct 2007 B2
7291272 Bourke et al. Nov 2007 B2
7291315 Obee et al. Nov 2007 B2
7297263 Nelson et al. Nov 2007 B2
7300587 Smith et al. Nov 2007 B2
7300589 Witham et al. Nov 2007 B2
7311842 Kim Dec 2007 B2
7329356 Brady Feb 2008 B2
7329359 Roark Feb 2008 B2
7335622 Koyanaka et al. Feb 2008 B2
7335808 Koper et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338603 McNew et al. Mar 2008 B1
7341618 Bayer et al. Mar 2008 B2
7341667 Kennard et al. Mar 2008 B2
7341977 Klabunde et al. Mar 2008 B2
7361279 Hernandez et al. Apr 2008 B2
7368388 Small et al. May 2008 B2
7368412 Tranter et al. May 2008 B2
7378372 Sylvester May 2008 B2
7422759 Kepner et al. Sep 2008 B2
7429330 Vo et al. Sep 2008 B2
7431758 Ota et al. Oct 2008 B2
7438828 Young Oct 2008 B2
7445718 Misra et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459086 Gaid Dec 2008 B2
7468413 Yokota et al. Dec 2008 B2
7473474 Toreki et al. Jan 2009 B2
7476311 Litz et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481939 Haley Jan 2009 B2
7498005 Yadav Mar 2009 B2
7534287 Zeller et al. May 2009 B2
7534453 Rzigalinski et al. May 2009 B1
7560023 Miyazawa et al. Jul 2009 B2
7566393 Klabunde et al. Jul 2009 B2
7572416 Alward et al. Aug 2009 B2
7588744 Sylvester Sep 2009 B1
7588782 Moerck et al. Sep 2009 B2
7591952 Young Sep 2009 B2
7611620 Carson et al. Nov 2009 B2
7645540 Boone et al. Jan 2010 B2
7661483 Mulukutla et al. Feb 2010 B2
7820100 Garfield et al. Oct 2010 B2
20010009831 Schink et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010012856 Parks et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020003116 Golden Jan 2002 A1
20020005382 Kulperger et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020044901 Wilson et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020066702 Liu Jun 2002 A1
20020072522 Parks et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020187990 Parks et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198136 Mak et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030015467 Johnston et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030133990 Hursey et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149406 Martineau et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156981 Mills Aug 2003 A1
20030180213 Carnes et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030203977 Klabunde et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030207949 Klabunde et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030215378 Zhou et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040029715 Schindler et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040031764 Heinig Feb 2004 A1
20040043914 Kaziska et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040045906 Wiseman Mar 2004 A1
20040050795 Park et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040091417 Yadav May 2004 A1
20040104377 Phelps et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040202703 Meyer-Ingold et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230086 Okun et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040241424 Barbera-Guillem Dec 2004 A1
20050058689 McDaniel Mar 2005 A1
20050067347 Vanhulle et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069464 Obee et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079415 Boone et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084755 Boone et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050098503 Kim May 2005 A1
20050126338 Yadav Jun 2005 A1
20050126430 Lightner, Jr. et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136486 Haushalter Jun 2005 A1
20050159307 Okun et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050230659 Hampden-Smith et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050257724 Guinther et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050271941 Bushong et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060000763 Rinker et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018954 Kuttler Jan 2006 A1
20060020795 Gasparini Jan 2006 A1
20060030622 Mak et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060049091 Cheetham et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070947 Conrad Apr 2006 A1
20060120930 Mizukami Jun 2006 A1
20060178609 Horn et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060198883 Parks et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060199301 Basheer et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060199733 Grier et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224237 Furst et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228275 Rutman Oct 2006 A1
20060237369 Kirts et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060246149 Buchholz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060254930 Martinie et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060257728 Mortensen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060275564 Grah et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070000836 Elefritz et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070012631 Coffey et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070017871 Reddy et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070080115 Sylvester Apr 2007 A1
20070081931 Cho et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070114179 Badger May 2007 A1
20070122327 Yang et al. May 2007 A1
20070128424 Omori et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070134307 Xiao et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142783 Huey et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149405 Spitler et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070151851 Tanaka Jul 2007 A1
20070158251 Chau Jul 2007 A1
20070167971 Huey et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070169626 Sullivan Jul 2007 A1
20070170115 Skillicorn Jul 2007 A1
20070286796 Koper et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298085 Lestage et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080050440 Wakamura et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058206 Misra et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080058689 Holloway et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081120 Van Ooij et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080090138 Vu et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080093580 Witham et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097271 Lo et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080102136 Koper et al. May 2008 A1
20080156734 Burba et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080199539 Baker et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080254146 Huey et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080254147 Huey et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262285 Black et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080264300 Sato et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080302267 Defalco Dec 2008 A1
20080311311 Khan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090001011 Knipmeyer et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090011240 Lenz et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090011930 Hagemeyer Jan 2009 A1
20090012204 Drechsler et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090069844 Green et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090098016 Koper et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090101588 Misra et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090101837 Kourtakis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090107919 Burba et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090107925 Burba et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090108777 Hyde et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090111289 Vinther Apr 2009 A1
20090111689 Burba et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112043 Burba et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090120802 Ciampi et al. May 2009 A1
20090130169 Bernstein May 2009 A1
20090206042 Landau et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090264574 Van Ooij et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090299253 Hursey Dec 2009 A1
20100042206 Yadav et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055456 Perera et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100243542 Burba, III et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100255559 Burba, III et al. Oct 2010 A1
20120328681 Hassler et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (77)
Number Date Country
2396510 Feb 2003 CA
1248486 Mar 2000 CN
0049593 Apr 1982 EP
0191893 Aug 1986 EP
0541158 May 1993 EP
0939431 Jan 1999 EP
1201607 Feb 2002 EP
1080144 Aug 2002 EP
1452229 Sep 2004 EP
1071500 Feb 2005 EP
1870150 Dec 2007 EP
2161067 Mar 2010 EP
2177252 Apr 2010 EP
2426469 Nov 2006 GB
1151917 Jun 1989 JP
H2-17220 Apr 1990 JP
10165948 Jun 1998 JP
11090413 Apr 1999 JP
11302684 Nov 1999 JP
11-302684 Nov 1999 JP
2000024647 Jan 2000 JP
2000-024647 Jan 2000 JP
2002205062 Jul 2002 JP
2002-282686 Oct 2002 JP
2002349234 Dec 2002 JP
2004050069 Feb 2004 JP
2004057870 Feb 2004 JP
2004305915 Nov 2004 JP
2004330012 Nov 2004 JP
2005-023373 Jan 2005 JP
2005028312 Feb 2005 JP
2005-028312 Feb 2005 JP
2005048181 Feb 2005 JP
2005288363 Oct 2005 JP
2005-288363 Oct 2005 JP
2006-320847 Nov 2006 JP
2006320847 Nov 2006 JP
07081932 Mar 2007 JP
2010-083741 Apr 2010 JP
2136607 Sep 1999 RU
2178599 Jan 2002 RU
663291 May 1979 SU
1766848 Oct 1992 SU
WO 9511195 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9712672 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9807493 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9928239 Jun 1999 WO
WO 0132799 May 2001 WO
WO 0132820 May 2001 WO
WO 0178506 Oct 2001 WO
WO 03092748 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004076770 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004096433 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005028707 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005042130 May 2005 WO
WO 2005056175 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005075000 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005081722 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2006011764 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006011765 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006044784 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006047613 May 2006 WO
WO 2006070153 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006102008 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2006117424 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007011877 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007041553 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2007120910 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2008151173 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009064845 May 2009 WO
WO 2009097672 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2009142823 Nov 2009 WO
WO 2010010569 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010010570 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010010571 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010010574 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010019934 Feb 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (205)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 11/793,895, Boen et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,602, Burba et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,644, Burba et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,968, Burba et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/616,653, filed Nov. 11, 2009, Burba et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/632,523, filed Dec. 7, 2009, Witham et al.
“Bastnasite”, available at htt://webmineral.com/data/Bastnasite-(Ce).shtml, accessed Jul. 30, 2007, 6 pages.
“Carbonates”, available on the Molycorp website Dec. 13, 2005, pp. 22-30.
“Cerium: A Guide to its role in Chemical Technology”, Molycorp, 1992, 48 pages.
“Clear Choices for Clean Drinking Water”, Consumer Reports Jan. 2003, pp. 33-37.
“Foul Release System and Drag”, Proceedins of the PCE 2001 Conference, pp. 273-286, Antwerp, 12 pages.
“Homogeneous Reactions of As and Se Oxoanions in Aqueous Solutions, and the Photooxidation of their Reduced Species in the X-ray Beam”, available at http://geoweb.princeton.edu/research/geochemistry/research/aqueous-oxoanion.html, accessed May 6, 2009.
“Hydrometallurgy”, Hazen Research, Inc., available at http://www.hazenusa.com/hydrometallurgy-1.php, accessed Dec. 21, 2006, 7 pages.
“Potentiometry”, date unknown, 14 pages.
“The Bacteriostatic Activity of Cerium, Lanthanum, and Thallium”, Burkes et al., Journal of Bateriology, 54:417-24 (1947).
“UI Arsenic water treatment project shows promise”, University of Idaho, Environmental News Network, Dec. 3, 2002, 2 pages.
Ahmed et al., “Arsenic Mitigation in Bangladesh”, Oct. 2002, 67 pages.
Ahmed et al., “Arsenic Mitigation Technologies in South and East Asia”, 44 pages, date unknown.
Ahmed, “An Overview of Arsenic Removal Technologies in Bangladesh and India,” Buet-Unu International Workshop on Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water, May 5-7, 2001, pp. 251-269.
Ahmed, “Water Supply Options”, available at http://www.physics.harvard.edu/˜wilson/arsenic/conferences/Feroze—Ahmed/Sec—3 . . . , accessed May 8, 2009, 25 pages, Jan. 29, 2002.
Al-Abed et al., “Arsenic Release from Iron Rich Mineral Processing Waste; Influence of pH and Redox Potential”, Chemosphere, 66, pp. 775-782 (2007).
Alam et al., “Chemical Extraction of Arsenic from Contaminated Soil”, J. Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng., 41 (4), pp. 631-643 (2006 ).
Alam et al., “Extraction of arsenic in a synthetic arsenic-contaminated soil using phosphate”, Chemosphere 43 (2001) 1035-1041.
Ali et al., “Fate of Arsenic in Wastes Generated from Arsenic Removal Units”, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, date unknown, pp. 147-159.
Amimono, “Arsenic removal by inorganic ion-exchanger”, available at http://www.apec-vc.or.jp/e/modules/tinyd00/index.php?id=63&kh—open—cid—00=7, accessed May 8, 2009.
Arsenate, Wikipedia, available at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arsenate&printable=yes, accessed May 6, 2009, 2 pages.
Baker et al., “Present General Status of Understanding of Heteroply Electrolytes and a Tracing of Some Major Highlights in the History of Their Elucidation”, Chem. Rev., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 3-50.
Banu et al., “Fabrication of Diffaction-encoded micro-particles using nano-imprint lithography”, J. Micromech. Microeng. 17 (2007) S116-S121.
Chambers et al., “Modern approaches to marine antifouling coatings”, Surface & Coatings Technology 201 (2006) 3642-3652.
Chang, et al., “Wet air oxidation of a reactive dye solution using CoAIPO4-5 and CeO2 catalysts”, Chemosphere, Aug. 2003, vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 943-949.
Chi et al., “Preparation of Enriched Cerium Oxide from Bastnasite with Hydrochloric Acid by Two-Step Leaching”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, vol. 37B, Apr. 2006—155.
ClearWater Filtration Systems, Press Release, “New Filtration Patent to Revolutionize Home Water Filtration: Arsenic Levels Can Now be Controlled”.
Clifford et al., “Oxidizing Arsenic III to Arsenic V for Better Removal”, Water & Wastes Digest, Water Quality Products, Mar. 2001, vol. 6, No. 3, available at http://www.wwdmag.com/Oxidizing-Arsenic-III-to-Arsenic-V-for-Better-Removal- . . . , accessed May 6, 2009, 2 pages.
Coronado et al., “Polyoxometalate-based Molecular Materials”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 273-296.
Corvini et al., “Mercury Removal from Natural Gas and Liquid Streams”, UOP LLC, 11 pages, date unknown.
Dejneka et al., “Rare earth-doped glass microbarcodes”, PNAS, Jan. 21, 2003, vol. 100, No. 2, 389-393.
Emsley, “The Elements” Third Edition, 1998, pp. 22-23, 26-27, 54-55, 110-111.
Everett et al., “Study of the Uncatalyzed Oxidation of Arsenic(III) by Cerium(IV) in Perchloric Acid Medium”, Jan. 10, 1971, Stanford University.
Fertonani et al., “Solid State Reactions of Mercury with Pure Noble Metals Part 2 Mercury iridium system”, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2002, vol. 67, pp. 403-409.
Fujikawa et al., “Simulteneous removal of arsenic, iron and manganese in biological treatment unit”, available at http://www.apec-vc.or.jp/e/modules/tinyd00/index.php?id=65&kh—open—cid—00=7, accessed May 8, 2009, 3 pages.
Fujikawa et al., “The aim of this special edition”, Kyoto University, available at http://www.apec-vc.or.jp/e/modules/tinyd00/index.php?id=61&kh—open—cid—00=7, accessed May 8, 2009.
Goldberg, “Competitive Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite on Oxides and Clay Minerals”, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:413-421 (2002).
Gordon, “Network Progress: An Update from the Secretariat”, World Health Organization: International Network to Promote Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage, Issue 2, May 2005, 10 pages.
Gouzerh et al., “Main-Group Element, Organic, and Organometallic Derivatives of Polyoxometalates”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 77-112.
Granite et al., “Novel Sorbents for Mercury Removal from Flue Gas”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 1020-1029.
Granite et al., “Sorbents for Mercury Capture from Fuel Gas with Application to Gasification Systems”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 4844-4848.
Granite et al., “Techniques for Mercury Control and Measurement in Gasification Systems”, Presented at the 5th International Symposium on Gas Cleaning at High Temperature, Morgantown, WV, Sep. 2002, pp. 1-5.
Hakuta et al., “Production of Ultra-fine Ceria Particles by Hydrothermal Synthesis Under Supercritical Conditions ”, Journal of Materials Science Letters, 1998, vol. 17, pp. 1211-1213.
Harck, “Arsenic in the US”, Clean Water Filtration Systems, Jan. 2002, 42 pages.
Haron et al., “Sorption removal of arsenic by cerium-exchanged zeolite P”, Materials Science and Engineering B, 2008, vol. 149, pp. 204-208.
Harper et al., “Removal of arsenic from wastewater using chemical precipitation methods”, Water Environment Research, vol. 64, No. 3, 200-203.
Hayes et al., “The Phase Stability of Cerium Species in Aqueous Systems”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 149 (12) C623-C630 (2002).
Hemmila et al., “Progree in Lanthanides as Luminscent Probes”, Journal of Fluorescence, vol. 15, No. 4, Jul. 2005, 529-542.
Henderson, et al., “Redox properties of water on the oxidized and reduced surfaces of CeO2(111)”, Surface Science, Feb. 20, 2003, vol. 526, Nos. 1-2, pp. 1-18, Environ. Molecular Sci. Lab., Pacific Northwest Nat. Lab., Richland, WA.
Hill, “Introduction: Polyoxometalates—Multicomponent Molecular Vehicles to Probe Fundamental Issues and Practical Problems”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 1-2.
Housecroft et al., “Inorganic Chemistry”, 2001, Pearson Prentice Hall, chapter 7, pp. 170-186; chapter 14, pp. 338-344; Appendix 11, pp. 752-754; chapter 24, pp. 622-640.
Jadhav, “Development and Evaluation of Nanoscale Sorbents for Mercury Capture from Warm Fuel Gas”, Aug. 25, 2006, 44 pages.
Jang et al., “Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Solids and Washing Effluents”, Chemosphere, 60, pp. 344-354, (2005).
Jeannin, “The Nomenclature of Polyoxometalates: How to Connect a Name and a Structure”, Chem. Rev., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 51-76.
Johnston et al., “Safe Water Technology for Arsenic Removal”, Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water, pp. 1-22, date unknown.
Jones et al., “Arsenic 2000: An Overview of the Arsenic Issue in Bangladesh”, Water Aid Bangladesh, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-70.
Kahakachchi et al., “Extraction of arsenic species from spiked soils and standard reference materials”, Analyst 2004, 129, 714-718.
Katsoulis, “A Survey of Applications of Polyoxometalates,” Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 359-388.
Kim et al., “Carbonate Effects in the Electrochemical Oxidation of Arsenite”, Electrochemical Methods for Wastewater and Potable Water Treatment, Preprints of Extended Abstracts, vol. 42, No. 2, 2002.
Klemperer et al., “Polyocoanion Chemistry Moves toward the Future: From Solids and Solutions to Surfaces,” Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 297-306.
Kozhevnikov, “Catalysis by Heteropoly Acids and Multicomponent Polyoxometalates in Liquid-Phase Reactions”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 171-198.
Lambert, Human Health and Toxicology Information Sheet for Lanthanum Concentrate (5210/5212) and Lanthanum Lantanum Chloride (5240/5241), pp. 1-8, University of California, Irvine.
Lin, et al.“Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol by various CeO2 catalysts”, Water Research, 2002, vol. 36, pp. 3009-3014.
Link et al., “Inorganic Nanoparticles for Transfection of Mammalian Cells and Removal of Viruses from Aqueous Solutions”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 98, No. 5, Dec. 1, 2007, 1083-1093.
Lipps et al., “Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water by Adsorptive Media”, U.S. EPA Demonstration Project at Spring Brook Mobile Home Park in Wales, ME, Six-Month Evaluation Report, Sep. 2006, 12 pages.
Liu, et al. “Effect of CeO2 doping on catalytic activity of Fe2O3/gamma-Al2O(3) catalyst for catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of azo dyes”, J. Hazard. Mater., May 8, 2007, vol. 143, Nos. 1-2, pp. 448-454, School of Municipal & Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, China.
Lopez-Anton, et al., “Retention of mercury in activated carbons in coal combustion and gasification flue gases”, Fuel Processing Technology, Jun. 20, 2002, vol. 77-78, pp. 353-358.
Lowell et al., “Selection of Metal Oxides for Removing SO2 From Flue Gas”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 1971, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 384-390.
Mizuno et al., “Heterogeneous Catalysis”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 199-218.
Muller et al., “Polyoxometalates: Very Large Clusters—Nanoscale Magnets”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 239-272.
Murcott et al., “Innovative and Sustainable Technologies to Address the Global Arsenic Crisis”, Sandia National Laboratories 2005 Vendor's Forum, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Nov. 2, 2005, 85 pages.
Mushak, “Potential Impact of Acid Precipitation on Arsenic and Selenium”, Environmental Health Perspectives vol. 65, pp. 105-113, 1985.
Ohashi, “Arsenic removal technology—Arsenic removal using manganese oxide”, available at http://www.apec-vc.or.jp/e/modules/tinyd00/index.php?id=64&kh—open—cid—00=7, accessed May 8, 2009, 5 pages.
Oztekin, “Recovery of Acides from Salt Forms”, Desalinatio, 2007, vol. 212, pp. 62-69.
Peng et al., “Ceria nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes for the removal of arsenate from water”, Materials Letters, 2005, vol. 59, pp. 399-403.
Portzer et al., “Development of novel sorbents for mercury control at elevated temperatures in coal-derived syngas: Results of initial screening of candidate materials”, Fuel Process. Technol. 2004, vol. 85 pp. 621-630.
Puraspec 1156 Mercury Removal, Johnson Matthey Catalysts 2003, 2 pages.
Puszynski et al., “Demonstration Project for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water at Keystone, South Dakota”, Mar. 15, 2005, 23 pages.
Rhule et al., “Polyoxometalates in Medicine,” Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 327-358.
Sadakane et al., “Electrochemical Properties of Polyoxometalates as Electrocatalysts”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 219-238.
Seida, et al., “Synthesis of clay-cerium hydroxide conjugates for the adsorption of Arsenic”, Adsorption Science and Technology, Dec. 2005, vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 607-618.
Shimoto, “Arsenic Removal Technology—Cerium adsorbent”, available at http://www.apec-vc.or.jp/e/modules/tinyd00/index.php?id=62&kh—open—cid—00=7, accessed May 8, 2009, 4 pages.
Smith et al., “American Rare Earth Minerals: The Indispensable Resource for Clean Energy Technologies”, Molycorp Minerals, LLC, Prepared for Congressional Leaders Jan. 29, 2009, 21 pages.
Song, et al., “Mechanism of the Photocatalytic Degradation of C.I. Reactive Black 5 at pH 12.0 Using SrTiO3/CeO2 as the Catalyst”, Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, vol. 41, No. 16, pp. 5846-5853, College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, China.
Song, et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Direct Red 23 in aqueous solutions under UV irradiation using SrTiO3/CeO2 composite as the catalyst”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Apr. 15, 2008, vol. 152, No. 3, pp. 1301-1308, College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, China.
Spotnitz, et al., “Mediated electrosynthesis with cerium (IV) in methanesulphonic acid”, Journal of Applied Chemistry, Mar. 1990, vol. 20, No. 2, 209-215.
Stiltner, “Mercury Removal from Natural Gas and Liquid Streams”, 2001, UOP LLC, 10 pages.
Tannehill, “Naturally Occurring Arsenic and Mercury” Proceedings from the Seventy-Fifth Gas Processors Association Conference, May 2007, pp. 54-55.
Thill et al., “Cytotoxicity of CeO2 Nanoparticles for Escherichia coli. Physico-Chemical Insight of the Cytotoxicity Mechanism”, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 6151-6156.
Tributyltin, available at http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/pyrethrins-ziram/tributyltin-ext.html, accessed Jul. 3, 2008, 6 pages.
Trovarelli, “Cerium Dioxide : a key component in environmental catalysis”, Rich Mac Magazine, La Chimica e L'Industria, Sep. 1996, vol. 78, pp. 823-829.
Vu et al., “Review of Arsenic Removal Technologies for Contaminated Groundwaters”, Argonne National Laboratory, Apr. 2003, 41 pages.
Wasay et al., “Adsorption of fluoride, phosphate, and arsenate ions on lanthanum-impregnated silica gel”, Water Environment Research, vol. 68, No. 3 (May-Jun. 1996), pp. 295-300.
Weinstock, “Homogeneous-Phase Electron-Transfer Reactions of Polyoxometalates”, Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 113-170.
Worthington et al., “Kinetics and Analytical Applications of the Ruthenium Catalyzed Reaction between Cerium(IV) and Arsenic(III) in Sulferic Acid Medium”, Analytical Chemistry, Sep. 1970, vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 1157-1164, Purdue University.
Yamase, “Photo- and Electrochromism of Polyoxometalates and Related Materials,” Chem. Re., 1998, vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 307-326.
Yang et al., “Decontamination of Chemical Warfare Agents”, Chem Rev., 1992, vol. 92, pp. 1729-1743.
Yates, et al., “Kinetics of the Iodide-catalyzed Reaction between Cerium(IV) and Arsenic(III)”, Jan. 19, 1956, Yale University.
Yotsumoto et al., “Latest functions and introduction cost of water treatment technique, Water treatment technique using cerium based adsorbent and examples”, Plant and Process, vol. 47, No. 8, pp. 60-63 (2005), Japan.
Yu et al., “The Phase Stability of Cerium Species in Aqueous Systems”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 153 (1) C74-C79 (2006).
Zhang et al., “Arsenate adsorption on an Fe-Ce bimetal oxide adsorbent : Role of surface properties”, Jan. 1, 2005,Institute of Research and Innovation, Japan.
Zhang Yu et al: “Arsenic(V) removal with a Ce(IV)-doped iron oxide adsorbent.” Chemosphere, vol. 51, No. 9, Jun. 2003, pp. 945-952, XP001181786.
Zhou et al., “Cryptography based on the absorption/emission features of multicolor semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots”, Optics Express, Jun. 28, 2004, vol. 12, No. 13, 2925-2931.
Abanades et al., “Thermochemical hydrogen production from a two-step solar-driven water-splitting cycle based on cerium oxides.” Solar Energy 80 (2006) 1611-1623.
Adschiri et al., “Hydrothermal Synthesis of Metal Oxide Fine Particles at Supercritical Conditions,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 4901-4907.
Casey, “Mystery Ceramic could lead to cheaper, stronger hydrogen fuel cells,” gas2.0, Oct. 12, 2009, available at http://gas2.org/2009/10/12/mystery-ceramic-could-lead-to-cheaper-stronger-solid- . . . 3 pages.
Hakuta et al., “Production of ultra-fine ceria particles by hydrothermal synthesis under supercritical conditions,” Jouranl of Materials Science Letters 17 (1998) 1211-1213.
Kozlova et al., “Overall water splitting over Pt/TiO2 catalyst with Ce3+/Ce4+ shuttle charge transfer system,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009) 138-146.
Kreh et al., “Selective Oxidations with Ceric Methanesulfonate and Ceric Trifluoromethanesulfonate” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 28, No. 10, pp. 1067-1068, 1987.
Lemont et al., “Promising optimization of the CeO2/CeCl3 cycle by reductive dissolution of cerium(IV) oxide,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 7355-7360.
Romero et al., “Syntheses, Crystal Structures, and Characterization of Bismuth Phosphates,” Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 1869-1874.
Spiro et al., “Heterogeneous Catalysis in Solution. Part II. The Effect of Platinum on Oxidation-Reduction Reactions,” pp. 78-96, date unknown.
Singh et al., “Ce0.67Cr0.33O2.11: A New Low-Temperature O2 Evolution Material and H2 Generation Catalyst by Thermochemical Splitting of Watert” Chem. Matter. 2009, 7 pages.
Viricelle et al., “Transformation of cerium(III) hydroxycarbonate into ceria. Part 1—Nucleation and growth rates of ceria,” J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1995, 91, 4431-4435.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Application No. PCT/US2004/002430, mailed Aug. 11, 2005.
International Search Report for International (PCT) Application No. PCT/US2004/002430, mailed Jun. 18, 2004.
Written Opinion for International Application (PCT) No. PCT/US2004/002430, mailed Jun. 18, 2004.
Official Action for Australian Application No. 2004207832, dated Sep. 25, 2008.
Official Action for European Patent Application No. 04706074.4, dated Nov. 17, 2008.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,247, mailed Apr. 4, 2008.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,247, mailed Dec. 5, 2008.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,247, mailed Apr. 20, 2009.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,247, mailed Nov. 4, 2009.
Paulenova et al., “Redox potentials and kinetics of the Ce3+/Ce4+ redox reaction and solubility of cerium sulfates in sulfuric acid solutions,” Journal of Power Sources 109 (2002) 431-438.
Official Action for Australian Application No. 2004207832, dated Aug. 28, 2009.
Notice of Acceptance for Australian Application No. 2004207832, dated Oct. 29, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,233, filed Mar. 10, 2010, Burba et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,114, filed Mar. 16, 2010, Whitehead et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,788, filed Apr. 9, 2010, Whitehead et al.
“NanoActive Cerium Oxide,” NanoScale Corporation, NA106.v.3 Apr. 1, 2008, 2 pages.
“NanoActive Granules,” NanoScale Corporation, available at http://www.nanoscalecorp.com/content.php/chemicals/granules/, printed Apr. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
“NanoActive Metal Oxides,” NanoScale Corporation, available at http://www.nanoscalecorp.com/content.php/chemicals/home/, printed Apr. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
“NanoActive Powders,” NanoScale Corporation, available at http://www.nanoscalecorp.com/content.php/chemicals/powders/, printed Apr. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
“NanoActive Suspensions,” NanoScale Corporation, available at http://www.nanoscalecorp.com/content.php/chemicals/suspensions/, printed Apr. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, H2O: Part V Facts Sheets, date unknown, 355 pages.
Cartwright, P.S., “A Residential Drinking Water Treatment Primer: Part 1,” Water Conditioning and Purification, Feb. 2008, 6 pages.
Klabunde, K., “Overview of NanoScale: Its Technology and Capabilities,” slideshow presentation by NanoScale, date unknown, 31 pages.
Pradeep, T., “Affordable clean water using nanotechnology,” Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Potential Environmental Benefits of Nanotechnology: Fostering safe innovation-led growth, OECD Jul. 15-17, 2009, 58 pages.
Williams et al., “Drinking water: New disinfecting medium boosts water treatment,” Filtration+Separation, Mar./Apr. 2010, pp. 16-19.
Youngran, J. et al., “Effect of competing solutes on arsenic (V) adsorption using iron and aluminum oxides,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 19(8), 2007, pp. 910-919 (Abstract Only).
Background of the Invention for the above-captioned invention filed Nov. 2, 2009 (previously provided).
Cotton, “Modern inorganic chemistry,” part 2, Moscow, World, 1969, pp. 202-203.
Sukharev, “Synthesis and use of specific oxyhydrate sorbents,” Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1987, pp. 75-102.
Firsching, “Solubility Products of the Trivalent Rare-Earth Arsenates,” J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1992, vol. 37, pp. 497-499.
Firsching et al., “Solubility Products of the Trivalent Rare-Earth Phosphates,” J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1991, vol. 36, pp. 93-95.
Jiang et al., “Biological nano-mineralization of Ce phosphate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Article in Press, Chemical Geology, 2010, vol. xxx, pp. xxx-xxx, 9 pages.
Nilchi et al., “Adsorption of selected ions on hydrous cerium oxide,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2009, vol. 279(1), pp. 65-74.
Ho et al., “Removal of fluoride from water through ion exchange by mesoporous Ti oxohydroxide,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, vol. 272, pp. 399-403.
Ishihara et al., “Pore size control for mesoporous titanium hydroxide prepared with mixed template molecules and its fluoride ion-exchange property,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2009, vol. 122, pp. 87-92.
Official Action (English translation only) for Russian Patent Application No. 2008107341, dated Jun. 2, 2010.
Summons to attend oral proceedings for European Patent Application No. 04706074.4, dated Jul. 12, 2010.
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 10003392.7, dated Jun. 8, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/010,609, filed Jan. 20, 2011, Burba.
Dos Santos et al., “Review paper on current technologies for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: Perspectives for Anaerobic biotechnology,” Bioresource Technology, 2007, vol. 98, pp. 2369-2385.
Gupta et al., “Novel Fluoropolymer-Based Striving for,” www.PCIMAG.COM, Jul. 2007, pp. 70-80.
Kirk-Othmer, ed., “Colorants for Foods, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Medical Devices,” Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition, vol. 6, 1998, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 892-941.
Kirk-Othmer, ed., “Dye Carriers,” Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition, vol. 8, 1998, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 533-600.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,049, filed Jun. 11, 2010, Burba III et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,054, filed Jul. 6, 2010, Hassler et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,847, filed Nov. 9, 2010, Lupo et al.
“Distinguishing Adsorption and Surface Precipitation of Phosphate and Arsenate on Hydrous Iron Oxides,” http://www.eng.nus.edu.sg/EResnews/0206/rd/rd—1.html, accessed Jul. 25, 2010, 4 pages.
Creaser et al., “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of the oxidation and reduction of a cerium(III) oxide/cerium foil substrate,” Catalysis Letters, 1994, vol. 23, pp. 13-24.
Heckert et al., “The role of cerium redox state in the Sod mimetic activity of nanoceria,” Biomaterials, Jun. 2008, vol. 29, pp. 2705-2709.
Higuchi et al., “Electronic structure of protonic conductor SrCeO3 by soft-X-ray spectroscopy,” Solid State Ionics, Nov. 2004, vol. 175, pp. 549-552.
Li et al., “Synergism between rare earth cerium(IV) ion and vanillin on the corrosion of steel in H2SO4 solution: Weight loss, electrochemical, UV—vis, FTIR, XPS, and AFM approaches,” Applied Surface Science, Jun. 2008, vol. 254, pp. 5574-5586.
Mullins et al., “Electron spectroscopy of single crystal and polycrystalline cerium oxide surfaces,” Surface Science, Jul. 1998, vol. 409, pp. 307-319.
Raichur et al., “Adsorption of fluoride onto mixed rare earth oxides,” Separation and Purification Technology, 2001, vol. 24, pp. 121-127.
Romeo et al, “XPS Study of the Reduction of Cerium Dioxide,” Surface and Interface Analysis, May 1993, vol. 20, pp. 508-512.
Sharmin, “Arsenic Removal Processes on Trial in Bangladesh,” Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water, BUET-UNU International Workshop, Dhaka, Bangladesh, May 5-7, 2001, pp. 23-30.
Tahir, Muhammad Aslam, “Project-3: Innovative Low Cost Arsenic Removal Technologies,” Thesis entitled Assessment of Arsenic and other Health Significant Water Quality Parameters in Ground Water of Northern Punjab, Department of Chemistry/ Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, 2004, pp. 92-134.
Wakita et al., “A Synthetic Study of the Solid Solutions in the Systems La2(CO3)3•8H2O-CE2(CO3)•H2O and La(OH)CO3-Ce(OH)CO3,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1979, vol. 52(2), pp. 428-432.
Youngran, J. et al., “Effect of competing solutes on arsenic (V) adsorption using iron and aluminum oxides,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 19(8), 2007, pp. 910-919.
Yuliati et al., “Ce L[sub]III-edge XANES Study on Valence of alumina-supported cerium oxide,” Photon Factory Activity Report 2004 #22 Part B, User's Report, 2005, pp. 56.
Official Action for Australian Patent Application No. 2009251182, dated Oct. 22, 2010.
“APV Engineered Coatings Kynar®,” Presentation by APV Engineered Coatings, http://www.apvcoatings.com/cms/resource—library/files/8537e627f567af63/kynar—presentation—weiss—inc—fiber—board—cement—pdf—.pdf, date unknown, 30 pages.
“Benchtop Granulator™,” LCI Corporation Technical Bulletin TB-GR-101, 2004, http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20040518160414/http://www.lcicorp.com/granulation/Docs/benchtop—tb.pdf, 1 page.
“New Products Kynar Aquatec from Arkema Inc.,” metalmag Magazine, posted May 28, 2009, 2 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/086,247, filed Apr. 13, 2011, Hassler et al.
“Poly GoneLines,” Schaner's Waste Water Products, Inc., available at http://www.struvite.com/products.html#polygone—lines, date unknown, 3 pages.
“Radial Xtruder® Model EXDCS-60,” LCI Corporation Technical Bulletin, 2006, http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20060511144227/http://www.lcicorp.com/granulation/Docs/xtruder60G—%20tb.pdf, 2 pages.
“Twin Dome Extruder Model TDG-80G,” LCI Corporation Technical Bulletin, 2006, http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20060511145629/http://www.lcicorp.com/granulation/Docs/tdg80—extruder—%20tb.pdf, 2 pages.
“Virus,” Wikipedia the free encyclopedia, http://wn.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virus&printable=yes, last modified Mar. 16, 2009, 28 pages.
Filtronics “NXT-2 Adsorptive media for arsenic removal,” at http://www.filtronics.com/nxt2.htm, date unknown, copyright 1998, 2008, 2 pages.
Kirk et al., “Pigments,” Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition, vol. 19, 1996, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-77.
Kroschwitz et al., eds., “Lanthanides,” Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition, vol. 14, 1995, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1091-1115.
Press Release, “Arkema proudly announces a new water-based fluoropolymer platform: Kynar® Aquatec™,” Arkema Inc., Jun. 26, 2006, available at http://www.arkemasalescorner.com/kynar.page.cfm?pag=985&PRR—ID=669, 1 page.
Press Release, “Kynar Aquatec® FMA Resins: Cool-Roof Coatings are Now Significantly Longer Lasting,” Arkema Inc., Aug. 24, 2009, available at http://www.arkema-inc.com/index.cfm?pag-343&PRR, 1 page.
Qureshi et al., “Synthesis, Dehydration Studies, and Cation-Exchange Behavior of a New Phase of Niobium(V) Phosphate,” Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., Oct. 1986, vol. 59, pp. 3247-3255.
Surasitani et al., “Kinetics of the Ruthenium-Catalyzed Arsenic (111)-Cerium(IV) Reaction,” J. Phys. Chem., 1959, vol. 63(6), pp. 890-892.
Tu, C., “A Study of Availability of Soil Arsenic (in Chinese)” Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, Dec. 1992, vol. 14 (6), pp. 447 (includes English translation).
Yong et al., “Nitrogen and Phosphorous Removal in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants in China: A Review,” International Journal of Chemical Engineering, accepted Apr. 26, 2010, 10 pages.
Notice of Acceptance for Australian Patent Application No. 2009251182, dated Feb. 1, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/159,179, filed Jun. 13, 2011, Burba et al.
Gaur et al., “Surface Modification of Activated Carbon for the Removal of Water Impurities,” Water Conditioning & Purification, Jun. 2008, 5 pages.
PhosGuard Product Description, at http://www.seachem.com/Products/product—pages/PhosGuard.html, copyright 2007-2011, 2 pages.
Product Sheet for FXPb1 Carbon Filters, Filtrex Technologies Pvt. Ltd, dated unknown, 2 pages.
Shankar, P.A., “Coconut Shell Based Activated Carbon with No Green House Gas Emission,” Water Conditioning & Purification, Mar. 2008, 4 pages.
Tokunaga et al., “Removal of fluoride ions from aqueous solutions by multivalent metal compounds,” International Journal of Environmental Studies, 1995, vol. 48(1), pp. 17-28.
Haron et al. “Sorption removal of arsenic by cerium-exchanged zeolite,” Poster at E-MRS Fall Meeting 2007, Symposium F, Sep. 17-21, 2007, 2 pages (Abstract).
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/632,523, mailed Jan. 15, 2013, 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100044317 A1 Feb 2010 US
Divisions (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 11435697 May 2006 US
Child 11925247 US
Parent 11029257 Jan 2005 US
Child 11435697 US
Parent 10353705 Jan 2003 US
Child 11029257 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11925247 Oct 2007 US
Child 12610569 US