Water reclamation systems and methods are described herein, including systems and methods using porous metal-organic frameworks.
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems for buildings typically are designed to vent air from within the building. The venting of air can allow for replacement air to be brought into the building. The vented air can contain moisture. The sources of moisture can include humidity present in the air, which can vary depending upon geographic region, as well as moisture generated within the building and added to the vented air. Moisture generated within the building can come from sources such as humans, humidifiers, or manufacturing processes.
Attempts have been made at reclaiming water from a building. One option has been to cool a surface below the dew point of the ambient air to encourage water condensation. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 9,617,719 discloses using a chiller to condense moisture from the exhaust of an air conditioning unit. Another option has been to concentrate water vapor through the use of solid or liquid desiccants. Yet another option has been to induce and control convection in a tower structure. Common problems of past attempts include excessive operating costs and lack of effectiveness when the ambient air has low humidity.
A system for reclaiming water from moisture-laden building exhaust exiting a building through a vent is described herein, where the system can include one or more porous metal organic frameworks (MOFs) disposed downstream of the building exhaust vent for adsorbing water from the exiting moisture-laden building exhaust. The adsorped water can be desorped from the MOF, either naturally or aided by cooling the MOF. The desorped water can optionally be collected or directed elsewhere for use or collection.
The one or more MOFs can each have an edge positioned for receiving the exiting moisture-laden building exhaust for purposes of adsorbing water from the exiting moisture-laden building exhaust via diffusion within the MOF. A cooler can lower the temperature of the MOF, such as when in abutment against a surface thereof, to facilitate desorption of water from within the MOF. The surface in contact or adjacent to the cooler can be different from the edge positioned for receiving the exiting moisture-laden building exhaust. Optionally, the surface can have a much greater surface area than the edge.
Optionally, the cooler can be a thermoelectric cooler. An optional heat flux sensor for monitoring condensation heat can be disposed within or adjacent to the MOF for purposes of adjusting the thermoelectric cooler.
Optionally, the thermoelectric cooler can be powered by solar power.
Optionally, a plenum can be disposed between the building exhaust vent and the MOF to help accommodate air flow changes without restricting air exiting the vent. Also optionally, the plenum can be configured to vary in volume in response to pressure changes within the plenum.
Optionally, the MOF can be configured for agitation, whether by applying agitation or by utilizing environmental vibrations.
Optionally, the system can be disposed on top of a building in order to act as a pressure head, and not requiring a pump.
A method of reclaiming water from moisture-laden building exhaust exiting a building through a vent is provided that includes adsorbing water within a porous MOF from the exiting moisture-laden building exhaust; desorping water from within the MOF by cooling at least a portion of the MOF; and optionally collecting water desorped from with the MOF.
Systems are described herein, and illustrated schematically in
The basic components of the system for reclaiming water from moisture-laden building exhaust exiting a building through a vent include (1) one or more MOFs disposed downstream of the building exhaust vent; (2) a cooler for facilitating desorption of water from with the MOF; and (3) a device for either collecting the reclaimed water or directing the retained water elsewhere.
The MOFs described herein can be formed of microcrystalline powder MOF-801 and have a porosity of approximately 85%. Instead of a MOF, a metal foam (MF) can be used in its place, including in the embodiments described herein. Typical adsorption and desorption rates for such materials can range between 2.5-3.5 L/kg/s. However, it can be advantageous to improve the natural desorption rate of the MOF by cooling one or more of the surfaces of the MOF, as described herein. For example, lowering a surface temperature from 65° C. to 25° C. can increase the cumulative natural desorption of the MOF from approximately 0.02 L/kg of water harvested to approximately 0.25 L/kg (though these values can depend on the relative humidity). The term MOF as used herein can refer to either a single piece of MOF or a grouping of MOFs, such as an array of MOFs.
The MOF can be provided immediately downstream of a vent of a building, as shown in
In one exemplary arrangement, depicted schematically in
In order to facilitate desorption of water from within the MOF 10, a thermoelectric chiller 30 can abut a surface 28 of the MOF, opposite the exit surface 18. The thermoelectric chiller 30 can be controlled using a heat flux sensor or temperature 32. For example, freezing or ice build-up should be avoided. As discussed above, cooling the MOF 10 can advantageously increase the rate of desorption and thus increase the rate of water exiting the MOF 10.
Another way to facilitate desorption of water from within the MOF 10 is to agitate the MOF 10. The agitation of the MOF 10 can be accomplished in several ways. One way to agitate the MOF 10 is to utilize a vibratory motor 34 abutting the MOF 10, as shown in
In another exemplary arrangement, depicted schematically in
Yet another exemplary embodiment can include an array 211 of MOFs, as shown in
Previous studies (e.g., H. Kim et al., Science, April 28; 356(633):430-434, 2017) have shown that a roughly 5 cm by 5 cm by 0.5 cm MOF layer (specifically, a MOF layer composed of MOF-801) of packing porosity approximately 0.85 sitting in ambient air can harvest an average of 0.3 L/day of water at 25% relative humidity. In this instance, the MOF layer undergoes mostly natural convection. The exact amount of water harvested can depend on a number of factors, such as air temperature, exhaust air velocity, relative humidity, amount of sunshine, MOF material, amount of MOF used in a system, chiller temperature (if present), any build-up of dirt and other debris within the MOF, and porosity.
For systems, such as those described above, the MOF layer (or MOF layer array) does not sit in stagnant air, rather it has ventilated air directly flowing onto it, resulting in forced turbulent convection. On average, a MOF layer exposed to forced turbulent convection is roughly 10 times for efficient at harvesting water than a naturally-convecting MOF layer. In one example,
The MOF system 400 of
Industrial size HVAC units may require an alternative method of integration of a MOF system to a residential A/C unit. For example, the manner in which the plenum 238 of
In
As discussed above, the amount of water harvested by any MOF system depends on the relative humidity of the air that flows onto a MOF layer. Examples of water harvesting as a function of relative humidity have been empirically measured (e.g., H. Kim et al., Science, April 28; 356(633):430-434, 2017), and
While the foregoing description is with respect to specific examples, those skilled in the art will appreciate that there are numerous variations of the above that fall within the scope of the concepts described herein and the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5149446 | Reidy | Sep 1992 | A |
6116034 | Alexeev | Sep 2000 | A |
6378311 | McCordic | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7043934 | Radermacher et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
9617719 | Sawyer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20040000165 | Max | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050189209 | Craven | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20120204725 | Goelet | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130098080 | Biancardi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20150353379 | Lee | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160313747 | Meijer | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Wahlgren, Roland V., “Atmospheric Water Vapour Processor Designs for Potable Water Production: A Review,” Water Research, 2001, vol. 35, Issue 1, pp. 1-22. |
Seo, You-Kyong, et al., “Energy-Efficient Dehumidification over Hierachically Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks as Advanced Water Adsorbents,” Advanced Materials, 2012, vol. 24, pp. 806-810. |
Furukawa, Hiroyasu, et al., “Water Adsorption in Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks and Related Materials,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, vol. 136, No. 11, pp. 4369-4381. |
Kim, Hyunho, et al., “Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight,” Science, 2017, 10.1126/science.aam8743, 10 pages. |
Chandler, David, “Water, water everywhere . . . even in the air,” MIT News Office, Apr. 14, 2017, [online], [retrieved on Oct. 23, 2017]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://news.mit.edu/2017/MOF-device-harvests-fresh-water-from-air-0414>, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190100902 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |