The present invention relates generally to fuel filters employed in connection with internal combustion engines and, more particularly, to filter assemblies that serve the dual purpose of removing water and particulates from fuel supplied to an internal combustion engine.
Modern fuel injection systems demand effective fuel filtration and water separation. Water and particulates in diesel fuel are blended into suspension by various pumps, both before and after delivery to the fuel tank of a vehicle. Fuel filtration systems are configured to remove particulates and separate water from the fuel flow delivered to the internal combustion engine.
Filtration and water separation can be carried out by a single layer of filter media typically composed of cellulose, glass fibers, or synthetic polymer fibers blended with resins and additives. The glass fibers are naturally hydrophilic, attracting water and causing the water to coalesce from the emulsion into larger droplets. The cellulose fibers are the basic filtration material. The synthetic fibers are often provided to add strength. The media may be chemically treated to reject water, so coalesced water droplets remain behind as fuel passes through the media. Solid, hard particulates are trapped in pores of the media.
As fuel quality degrades due to oxidation or contamination, the surface tension of the fuel water interface lowers, causing a more stable fuel/water emulsion. Media coated with asphaltenes (removed from the fuel) and/or a film of sludgy oxidized fuel can weaken or eliminate the water separation function, so the water separating capability of filters typically degrades over time. Furthermore, fuel additives and surfactants can interfere with the ability of glass fibers to coalesce water from solution.
Typical Current Mechanism for Filtration and Water Separation:
Media is cellulose/glass fiber/synthetic fiber blend with resins and additives.
The glass fiber and resins provide the mechanism for water coalescing and separation on the surface of the media. Water “clings” to the glass fibers by means of direct interception. Water droplets collide and form larger droplets on the surface of the media. Once droplet size is large enough to overcome the inertial forces of the fluid flow and viscosity, the water falls to the bottom of the filter cartridge housing (the “can”) due to gravity and the relative density difference of the fuel and water. The cellulose and synthetic fibers create a pore structure and provide strength to the media. Resins formed of heavier molecular weight of oxidized fuel and asphaltenes coat the fibers while hard particulates become entrained in the pores as the fuel flows through the media.
Disadvantages of Current Mechanism:
Media is typically a single layer. The primary filtration is done on the surface of the media, with limited filtration through its depth. A large surface area is required to minimize the speed at which the fluid flows through the media (face velocity) and obtain adequate resident time for increased interception of the water and debris/particulates.
The presence of surfactants and additives normally found in fuel will disarm the silenol group on the glass fibers, disabling the hydrophilic properties of the glass fibers and allowing water to pass through the media.
Existing media may be less effective at separating water from the more stable fuel/water emulsion when the surface tension of the fuel is lowered by surfactants and additives.
Resins, adhesives and surface treatments required in glass fiber media reduce the open area of the media that would otherwise be available for filtration of particulates, oxidized fuel and/or asphaltene.
As dirty fuel coats the surface of the media, there are fewer sites remaining on the media surface for water separation, and the hydrophilic properties of the media will degrade. As a result of this process, used elements typically have a reduced ability to separate water from fuel when compared to a new element.
Current Multilayer Filter Media:
Multilayer melt blown/cellulose filter media are available and provide some improvements over the single layer media described above. Available multilayer media is configured to simultaneously filter, coalesce and separate water on the surface or in the initial depth of the media, requiring the water to fall out of the fuel against the direction of fuel flow. Also, available multilayer media are typically employed in arrangements that direct unfiltered fuel flow through the meltblown layers first and then the cellulose layers afterwards. This design exposes the more sensitive fine fibers of the melt blown layers to the unfiltered fuel. As the dirty, oxidized fuel and asphaltenes coat the unprotected melt blown material, filter performance will degrade while pressure across the filter media will increase before exhausting all the available life of the cellulose layers.
An object of embodiments of the present disclosure is to maximize the effective use of each layer of the filter media throughout the depth of the media, extending the life of the filter element, without sacrificing water separation performance.
Another object of embodiments of the present disclosure is to improve the efficiency of particle filtration and water separation within the spacial constraints of existing filter cartridge configurations.
A further object of the present disclosure is to provide a new and improved filter cartridge where obstruction of the filter media by material removed from the fuel flow does not impair the water separating capability of the cartridge.
Embodiments of a fuel conditioning structure filter fuel prior to the water separation mechanism. A coalescing media employs hydrophilic synthetic fibers that coalesce water even with the low surface tension present in fuels treated with additives/surfactants. The coalescing media employs a gradient structure of fine fibers/small voids to larger fibers/larger voids in the direction of fuel flow. This structure promotes water adhesion and coalescence into large whole water droplets that are easily rejected by a water barrier. Pre-filtration extends the life of the coalescing media and water barrier by keeping these structures free of particulates, oxidized fuel and asphaltenes. This configuration helps prevent degradation in the ability of these layers to separate water over the life of the filter.
A preferred embodiment of the disclosed fuel conditioning structure carries out a filtration step before attempting to remove water. The fuel conditioning structure is illustrated in
In the direction of fuel flow the disclosed filtration/coalescing media 12 includes a coalescing media 18 preferably composed of spunbonded or melt blown synthetic fibers that provide a porous network configured to coalesce water from the filtered fuel. This layer is formed of near continuous thermoplastic polymer fibers combined into self-bonded webs using melt-blowing or spun-bonding processes. These processes are well known and will not be described in detail here. This layer or layers of synthetic fibers will be referred to as “the coalescing media” and designated by reference numeral 18. Processes such as melt blowing or spin-bonding and wet laying of synthetic fibers, may be appropriate for manufacturing the coalescing, but the coalescing media 18 is not limited to materials manufactured by these methods.
While the primary function of the coalescing media 18 is to provide a hydrophilic structure on which water will collect, it also serves as a secondary filtration mechanism for the few small hard particles passing through the cellulose layer. A further aspect of the disclosed filter media relates to the synthetic fibers of the coalescing media 18 being arranged in phases or layers, with the density and/or fiber thickness of the synthetic fibers varying throughout its depth. The fiber diameters can vary from submicron sizes up to greater than 50μ. One strategy for adjusting the structure of the coalescing media is to vary the average diameter and/or density of the fibers. For a given density, use of smaller average diameter fibers in a phase or layer results in smaller voids between the fibers. A preferred embodiment varies the structure of the coalescing media from fine fibers/high density to coarse fibers/low density in the direction of fuel flow. This structure increases the probability of direct interception of water and/or debris particles in the fine fibers, while allowing water droplets forming on the hydrophilic fibers to coalesce into progressively larger whole water droplets on the coarse fibers as they move in the direction of fuel flow.
An aspect of the invention relates to structuring the synthetic fiber media such that the coalesced water droplets are allowed to grow larger while they remain within the fibrous network of the coalescing media. For example, the downstream layers or phases of the coalescing media will have the largest fiber diameter and the least density to entrain larger droplets. Similarly, the layers more upstream will have smaller fiber diameters and higher density to provide maximum surface area on the fibers to entrain the smallest water droplets and particulates. The gradient change in the arrangement of the fibers will establish a profile or pattern through the depth of the media. A relatively deep (thick) layer of media used with this structure will increase the resident time of the coalesced water droplets within the media, increasing the droplet size exiting the media. Greater thickness will also increase the proportion of free water (water dispersed, but not dissolved in the fuel) that is converted to whole water droplets and ultimately removed by the fuel conditioning structure 10. It should be noted that the whole water droplets in the disclosed arrangement are moving with the flow of fuel, not against it as in some of the prior art arrangements.
Preferred synthetic fibers are those that are naturally hydrophilic, such as nylon. Polyester is another suitable example, which can be treated to acquire hydrophilic properties. Biconstituent or bicomponent fibers may also be suitable. Biconstituent fibers are fibers formed from a mixture of two or more polymers extruded from the same spinneret. Bicomponent fibers are formed by extruding polymer sources from separate extruders. Bicomponent fibers have the advantage of a regular sectional configuration, such as a core/sheath configuration in which one material surrounds the other. The structure of a bicomponent fiber can be designed to take advantage of the properties of both materials, for example, the strength of the core material and the hydrophilic properties of the sheath material.
In a preferred embodiment, the cellulose material may serve as substrate or base layer upon which the synthetic fiber layer is constructed in a manner that controls its density and structure as discussed above. An additional thin/stiff layer of (“scrim”) may be added over the synthetic fiber layer to protect its structure during manufacturing and handling. Alternatively, the cellulose layer and one or more discrete layers of synthetic fibers may be bonded to form the filtration/coalescing media 12.
One example of a filtration/coalescing media 12 is the cellulose material disclosed above, in combination with two layers of melt blown nylon material having a basis weight of 40 g/M2. The melt blown layer adjacent the cellulose layer has relatively fine fibers of between approximately 1μ and 15μ and an air permeability of approximately 84 CFM/ft2@½″ water. The downstream layer has fibers of between approximately 10μ and 25μ and an air permeability of approximately 187 CFM/ft2@½″ water. A further possible layer might have fibers of between 20μ and 45μ and an air permeability of approximately 332 CFM/ft2@½″ in water with a basis weight of 40 g/M2. It will be noted that, for the same basis weight of material, the finer fibers have a lower air permeability. This results from the smaller voids between the fibers and the relatively more densely packed fine fibers.
Experiments have shown that a filtration/coalescing media as described above followed by a water barrier removed approximately 98% of the free water in a fuel flow at a flow rate of approximately three times that of a prior art single layer media without failure.
After passing through the cellulose layer 16 and coalescing media 18, the flow includes clean filtered fuel and dispersed whole water droplets. Depending on the structure of the coalescing media 18, a whole water droplet can attain a size in the range from 200μ to 3000μ or greater in diameter. A final, porous, hydrophobic material is arranged to serve as a water barrier 14. This hydrophobic layer will be selected to have the largest suitable average pore size that will minimize the fluid velocity through it and still reject the incoming water droplets. Arranging the water barrier 14 after the cellulose layer 16 and coalescing media 18 will ensure that the water separating properties occur in the clean fuel, reducing or even eliminating degradation of the water separation function over time. The hydrophobic material may be treated cellulose or synthetic material, or naturally hydrophobic materials such as polyolefins such as polypropylene or fluoropolymers like Teflon.
According to a preferred arrangement, a space or gap is provided between the filtration/coalescing media 12 and the water barrier 14 as shown in
As shown in
A second alternative embodiment of a filter cartridge incorporating the fuel conditioning structure 10 is illustrated in
It is possible to reverse the relative positions of the filtration/coalescing media 12 and water barrier 14 and reverse the flow of fuel in the cartridge of
The disclosed filtration/coalescing media 12 may also be compatible with a two stage filter cartridge similar to that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,976,852.
While a preferred embodiment of the foregoing filter media has been set forth for purposes of illustration, the foregoing description should not be deemed a limitation. Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations and alternatives may occur to one skilled in the art and such adaptations and alternatives are intended to be encompassed by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/722,485, filed Sep. 30, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60722485 | Sep 2005 | US |