The present invention relates generally to the field of wastewater treatment systems, and more particularly to screens used in wastewater treatment reactors.
A wide range of wastewater treatment systems are known and are currently in use. Many such systems are large installations permanently positioned near wastewater treatment sites, such as municipalities, industries, and so forth. In general, such wastewater treatment may be divided into several stages, including primary treatment, secondary treatment, and tertiary treatment. Primary treatment often involves simple filtering, screening and removal of grit, sludge and debris. Secondary treatment may involve a range of chemical and biological processes. For example, a common process known as biochemical oxygen demand reduction (BOD) aims to reduce contaminants in wastewater by the action of bacterial or other microbial agents. Other secondary processes may include nitrification, and de-nitrification, among others. Tertiary treatment often involves “polishing” or final filtration intended to produce effluent that meets certain local or design standards. In certain applications, primary treatment alone may be employed, or secondary treatment alone may be used, or primary and secondary treatment may be used without tertiary treatment, all depending upon the desired effluent qualities.
In certain processes used in wastewater treatment, biological support media are employed that serve to form a point of attachment for bacteria and other microbial agents used for the intended process. For example, in BOD reactors, nitrification reactors and de-nitrification reactors, various physical configurations of media may be employed that can be circulated in the wastewater and that support the biological growth. Currently available media include various plastics molded, extruded, cut or otherwise formed into shapes that provide large surface areas for the biological growth while still permitting the flow of wastewater over all surfaces to promote the exchanges necessary for the intended treatment.
A concern in such systems is the proper circulation of water and biological growth support media, as well as its retention in the specific reactor. For example, aeration systems are often employed that continuously or periodically bubble air through the wastewater to provide the necessary gas constituents to the biological growth, and to circulate both the wastewater and the support media. A typical reactor may have a substantial portion of its volume filled with such media, which freely circulates within the wastewater. As water is drawn from the reactor to enter downstream processes, such as processes within the same secondary treatment, or for tertiary treatment, the water must be efficiently extracted, while preventing the biological support media from being drawn into a subsequent process, reactor or piping.
The transfer of wastewater from one secondary treatment reactor to another is typically performed via gravity feed, although pumps may also be employed. To ensure that the media is not drawn from a reactor, various screen configurations are employed. For example, tubular screens may extend from a wall of the reactor and wastewater may enter each screen along its length. The screens may be positioned at a level just below the surface of the wastewater such that there is a constant flow of water through all sides of the screens.
However, very little has been done in the field to optimize the configuration or even the length of such screens. Because the cost of the screens is a function of their length and size, it is generally unknown in the field whether properly sized screens or even the optimal number of screens is being employed. Moreover, for screens that extend considerable distances from the side of a reactor vessel, support structures must be provided to hold the screens in place for extended periods of use.
There is a need, therefore, for improved techniques for wastewater treatment that offer more efficient and cost-effective screening in reactor vessels to prevent the escape of biological support media.
The present invention provides a novel screening technique designed to response to these needs. The technique makes use of tubular or drum-shaped screens, or screens that may be formed in various configurations, such as T-shapes. The screens include one or more flow modifiers that may comprise pipes or tubes that extend longitudinally into the screens. The flow modifiers effectively distribute the pressures and velocities tending to draw water into the screens more effectively along the length of the screens. In particular, the flow modifiers may aid in producing a velocity at slots within the screens that is relatively constant along the screen length. Consequently, the overall length of the screens may be reduced while still providing the same or better flow characteristics as longer screens without flow modifiers. The overall cost and effectiveness of the screening systems are therefore improved.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
Turning now to the drawings, and referring first to
The reactions taking place in reactors 14 and 16 are aided by bacteria or other microbial growth supported on biological support media as indicated by reference numeral 20 in the figures. This support media may include various shapes of molded, cut, extruded, or otherwise formed plastics having substantial exposed surfaces on which the microbial growth is supported. Moreover, the biological support media includes openings over which wastewater can flow to support the biological growth and to promote the exchanges between the wastewater and the biological growth sufficient to carry on the intended reactions. An aeration system 22 may be supported within each reactor to bubble air into the wastewater, thereby providing nutrients for the biological growth, and circulating both the biological support media and the wastewater within each reactor. It should be noted that the screen configurations described herein may be equally well used in reactor vessels that do not use aeration systems, but that may use other types of mixing, including pulsed air, hydraulic, and mechanical mixing systems.
One or more tubular screens 10 are disposed within each reactor. The number, size and configuration of the screens may vary, depending upon such factors as the volume of the reactor, the volumetric or mass flow rate of wastewater intended, the residence time of the wastewater in each reactor, and so forth. The screens allow wastewater to flow from each reactor, while preventing the biological support media from exiting the respective reactor. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the length of the screens, indicated by reference numeral 26, may also vary, as may the diameter and type of screen (e.g., the size and number of holes in the screens).
The screens illustrated in
The screens may be supported in the reactors in various ways. For example, as shown in
It should be appreciated, however, that the types of arrangements illustrated in
Wastewater may flow into the screen from all sides, and flows within the screen towards the flange 42 to exit through a central opening in the flange. Within the screen body, first and second flow modifier tubes 60 and 62 are coaxially positioned. The first flow modifier tube, which may be referred to as an outer tube, extends a first distance within the screen body, while a second, inner modifier tube 62 extends further into the screen body. The flow modifier tubes are secured to the flange or to support structures extending from the flange (not shown) to maintain their position within the screen body. Water entering the screen body may take one of three flow paths. That is, water entering nearest the flange with typically flow through an annular area surrounding the first or outer flow modifier tube 60. Water flowing into the screen beyond the end of the first or outer flow modifier tube 60 may also flow through this annular area, but at least a portion of the flow will be directed through an annular area between the outer flow modifier tube and the inner flow modifier tube. Still further, water entering a still more distal region of the screen may flow through either of the first annular areas or through the center of the second or inner flow modifier tube 62. In all cases, the water entering the structure will flow out through flange 42. As discussed in greater detail below, it has been found that the use of the flow modifier tubes tends to more evenly distribute inflow, flow rates, and pressures along the entire length of the screen body.
Flow in the T-shaped screen of
It should be noted that the T-shaped screen configuration may be formed by a pair of drum screens, with flow modifiers in each. For example, drum screens if the type described above may be attached to a central flanged T-shaped structure. The flow paths, however, and effects of the flow modifiers on the slot velocities and overall flow rates would be essentially the same as those for the structure described above.
The particular size, lengths, wall thicknesses, materials and so forth of the flow modifier tubes may vary depending upon the particular application. For example, certain applications may require one, two or three such flow modifier tubes, depending upon such factors as the length of the screen, the configuration of the screen, the diameter of the screen, and the desired flow rate. The number and dimensions of the flow modifier tubes will also typically be a function of the sizes and number of openings in the screens. By way of example only, in a typical presently contemplated drum-type screen, two flow modifiers may be provided. The inner flow modifier tube extends into the screen body to a location at approximately ⅔ of its length, while the outer flow modifier extends to a location at approximately ⅓ of the length of the screen body.
As noted above, the use of flow modifiers in the screens allows for several advantages as compared to screens used in existing wastewater treatment systems. In particular, the flow modifiers tend to even the inlet flow along the length of the screens by altering the velocity of the water through the screen body. Accordingly, because more of the screen surface area serves to draw water from the surrounding reactor, the screens may be made significantly shorter as compared to those used in existing systems. By way of example, existing wastewater treatment systems may use drum screens without flow modifiers with lengths of approximately 4 m, with slot velocities on the order of 50 m/hr. Screens with flow modifiers of the type described above can replace these screens with equal effectiveness, but with a length of only 1 m, with slot velocities of between approximately 150 and 550 m/hr, and more particularly between approximately 200 and 275 m/hr. Similarly, for shorter conventional screens (e.g., 1 m), the same lengths may be used for screens with flow modifiers, but with reduced diameters. In both cases, a reduced number of screens may be used in a particular vessel, again with equal overall flow rates. The resulting structures are therefore more cost effective, owing to the shorter length of tubular screen material needed. Moreover, they require lighter support structures due to their reduced length.
In the illustration of
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
This application is a Nonprovisional Patent Application of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/154,277, entitled “Water Treatment Reactor Screening System and Method”, filed Feb. 20, 2009, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US10/24431 | 2/17/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/31/2011 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61154277 | Feb 2009 | US |