Water treatment system and method

Abstract
A method and apparatus for producing purified water. Treated water may be provided for domestic use wherein the water may be treated by removing selected dissolved species while retaining properties that may improve the properties or aesthetics of the water.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The invention is directed to a method and apparatus for treating water and, more specifically, for providing a high quality water for consumption and use.


2. Description of Related Art


Water that contains hardness species such as calcium and magnesium may be undesirable for some uses in industrial, commercial and household applications. The typical guidelines for a classification of water hardness are: zero to 60 milligrams per liter (mg/l) as calcium carbonate is classified as soft; 61 to 120 mg/l as moderately hard; 121 to 180 mg/l as hard; and more than 180 mg/l as very hard.


Hard water can be softened or purified by removing the hardness ion species. Examples of systems that remove such species include those that use ion exchange beds. In such systems, the hardness ions become ionically bound to oppositely charged ionic species that are mixed on the surface of the ion exchange resin. The ion exchange resin eventually becomes saturated with ionically bound hardness ion species and must be regenerated. Regeneration typically involves replacing the bound hardness species with more soluble ionic species, such as sodium chloride. The hardness species bound on the ion exchange resin are replaced by the sodium ions and the ion exchange resins are ready again for a subsequent water softening step.


Such systems have been disclosed. For example, Dosch, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,148,687 teaches a washing machine including a water softening arrangement using ion exchange resins. Similarly, Gadini et al., in International Application Publication No. WO00/64325, disclose a household appliance using water with an improved device for reducing the water hardness. Gadini et al. teach of a household appliance having a control system, a water supply system from an external source and a softening system with an electrochemical cell.


Electrodeionization (EDI) is one process that may be used to soften water. EDI is a process that removes ionizable species from liquids using electrically active media and an electrical potential to influence ion transport. The electrically active media may function to alternately collect and discharge ionizable species, or to facilitate the transport of ions continuously by ionic or electronic substitution mechanisms. EDI devices can include media having permanent or temporary charge and can be operated to cause electrochemical reactions designed to achieve or enhance performance. These devices also include electrically active membranes such as semi-permeable ion exchange or bipolar membranes.


Continuous electrodeionization (CEDI) is a process wherein the primary sizing parameter is the transport through the media, not the ionic capacity of the media. A typical CEDI device includes alternating electroactive semi-permeable anion and cation exchange membranes. The spaces between the membranes are configured to create liquid flow compartments with inlets and outlets. A transverse DC electrical field is imposed by an external power source using electrodes at the bounds of the membranes and compartments. Often, electrolyte compartments are provided so that reaction product from the electrodes can be separated from the other flow compartments. Upon imposition of the electric field, ions in the liquid are attracted to their respective counter-electrodes. The adjoining compartments, bounded by the electroactive anion permeable membrane facing the anode and the electroactive cation membrane facing the cathode, typically become ionically depleted and the compartments, bounded by the electroactive cation permeable membrane facing the anode and the electroactive anion membrane facing the cathode, typically become ionically concentrated. The volume within the ion-depleting compartments and, in some embodiments, within the ion-concentrating compartments, also includes electrically active media. In CEDI devices, the media may include intimately mixed anion and cation exchange resins. The ion-exchange media typically enhances the transport of ions within the compartments and may participate as a substrate for controlled electrochemical reactions. Electrodeionization devices have been described by, for example, Giuffrida et al. in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,632,745, 4,925,541 and 5,211,823, by Ganzi in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,259,936 and 5,316,637, by Oren et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,809 and by Kedem in U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,579, which are incorporated herein by reference.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the invention provides a method of providing water comprising passing a first water stream through a depleting compartment of an electrodeionization device to produce a second water stream having an LSI less than about 0, passing the second water stream through a cathode compartment of the electrodeionization device to produce a third water stream, the third water stream being less corrosive than the first water stream and having an LSI of less than about 0.


In another aspect, the invention provides a method of providing potable water comprising passing a first water stream through a cathode compartment of an electrochemical device to produce a second water stream passing the second water stream through a depleting compartment of an electrochemical device to produce a third water stream having an LSI less than about 0, the third water stream being less corrosive than the first water stream.


In another aspect, the invention provides a method of retaining a residual chlorine level in water comprising removing greater than 90% of active chlorine from a first water stream; passing the water stream through a depleting compartment of an electrochemical device; removing a portion of any ions dissolved in the water stream, introducing the water stream to a loop, the loop including a storage vessel; and introducing active chlorine in a second water stream into the loop at a rate adequate to maintain an effective average chlorine concentration in the loop.


In another aspect, the invention provides a method of selectively retaining ions in a water supply comprising passing a feed water through a depleting compartment of an electrochemical device, the feed water comprising monovalent and divalent ions; removing at least 30% of the divalent cations from the feed water and retaining at least about 80% of a species selected from silica, boron and fluoride, to produce a treated water; and supplying the treated water for household consumption.


In another aspect, the invention provides a method of producing a purified water comprising passing a water stream through a depleting compartment of an electrochemical device and adjusting a voltage applied to the electrochemical device to control the current passing through the electrochemical device at a level adequate to remove greater than about 25% of any calcium in the water stream and inadequate to remove greater than about 10% of any fluoride or silica species from the water stream.


In another aspect, the invention provides a method comprising softening a feed water through a bed of ion exchange material to remove greater than 30% of any hardness ions from the feed water to produce a softened water, supplying the softened water for household consumption, and discharging a concentrated solution comprising calcium, wherein the sum of the ionic content of the softened water and the ionic content of the concentrated solution is no greater than the total ionic content supplied by the feed water.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred, non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an electrochemical device or module in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of another electrochemical module in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a graph showing copper extracted from a copper coupon by three different water samples;



FIG. 5 is a graph showing copper extracted from a copper coupon after exposure to three different waters for various lengths of time;



FIG. 6 is a graph showing the amount of copper extracted from copper coupons after exposure to three different waters where the water is being changed out at various intervals;



FIG. 7 graphically illustrates product water conductivity and current applied in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention; and



FIG. 8 graphically illustrates water conductivity out of a stack and out of a tank, as well as the current applied during operation in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

United States Patent Applications titled WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by Wilkins et al., which was filed on Nov. 13, 2003 and assigned application Ser. No. 10/712,674; titled WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by Jha et al., which was filed on Nov. 13, 2003 and assigned application Ser. No. 10/712,621; titled WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by Ganzi et al., which was filed on Nov. 13, 2003 and assigned application Ser. No. 10/712,250; titled WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by Freydina et al., which was filed on Nov. 13, 2003, assigned application Ser. No. 10/712,248, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,083,733 on Aug. 1, 2006; titled WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by Wilkins et al., which was filed on Nov. 13, 2003 and assigned application Ser. No. 10/712,163; titled WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by Freydina et al., which was filed on Nov. 13, 2003 and assigned application Ser. No. 10/712,685; and titled WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by Jha et al., which was filed on Nov. 13, 2003 and assigned application Ser. No. 10/712,166 are hereby incorporated by reference herein.


The present invention provides a method and apparatus for providing purified or treated water from a variety of source types. Possible water sources include well water, surface water, municipal water and rain water. The treated product may be for general use or for human consumption or other domestic uses, for example, bathing, laundering, and dishwashing.


Often, quality drinking water is associated with highly purified water. However, as long as the water is free of microbial contamination, the best drinking water may not necessarily be the most chemically pure. For example, water that has been purified to a high resistivity, for example, greater than about 1 megaOhm, may be so devoid of ionic content that it becomes “hungry” and corrosive to material such as copper, that may be used in water piping systems. Taste may also be affected by, for instance, the removal of bicarbonate species. Furthermore, beneficial or desirable chemicals that have been added to the water, for example, fluoride and chlorine species, may be removed along with undesirable species, resulting in a water that may need to be re-fortified.


If a household is supplied with hard water, i.e., water containing greater than about 60 ppm calcium carbonate, it is often treated prior to use by being passed through a water softener. Typically, the water softener is of the rechargeable ion exchange type and is charged with cation resin in the sodium form and anion resin in the chloride form. As water passes through the resin bed, major contributors to hardness, such as calcium and magnesium species, are exchanged for sodium. In this manner, the water can be softened as the concentration of divalent cations and, in particular, calcium and magnesium ions, decreases. However, an equivalent of sodium is added to the treated water for every equivalent of calcium that is removed. Thus, although the water is softened, the hardness is replaced with sodium ions that some consumers may find undesirable. Furthermore, when these ion exchange beds are recharged by rinsing with sodium chloride solution, the resulting brine must be disposed of and is often discharged to a septic system where the brine becomes available to re-enter the ground water. In some jurisdictions, discharge of brine to a domestic septic system is regulated or prohibited.


Other methods of softening water include the use of reverse osmosis devices that can supply high purity water, but generally do so at a slow rate and require the use of a high pressure pump. Furthermore, many reverse osmosis membranes can be fouled by the presence of dissolved materials such as silica, which may often be found in well water.


Although the examples described herein use electrodeionization devices, other water treatment techniques, such as capacitive deionization, may be just as applicable.


Continuous electrodeionization can also be used to remove hardness components from a water supply. However, most CEDI systems have power, space and service requirements that make them impractical for domestic use. In addition, because chlorine may be undesirable in the presence of ion exchange resins, if a chlorinated water supply is to be softened, the chlorine often should first be removed from the water. This means that any water treated in this manner does not benefit from the residual bactericidal properties of the chlorinated water supply.


Frequently, CEDI systems are designed to remove as many ions as possible, and easily ionizable species such as calcium and sodium are efficiently removed so that less than 1% of the cations present in the feed water remains in the treated water. For many industrial and commercial uses, this highly purified water may be beneficial, however, this level of purity may be undesirable for a household water supply in which some level of cation content may be beneficial. Furthermore, this highly purified water may be corrosive and may be prone to attack copper pipes that are often present in domestic water distribution systems. Some domestic water distribution systems may include lead soldered joints, and heavy metals, such as lead, may also leach into water passing through the pipes.


In some jurisdictions, minimum levels of calcium may be necessary in order to comply with health and safety regulations. Thus, a high purity system that removes greater than, for example, 90 or 99% of the calcium from the water supply may be inappropriate in these locations.


The present invention in accordance with one or more embodiments, can utilize CEDI technology to produce purified or treated water with properties that may be ideal water for domestic consumption. For example, the apparatus can soften a hard or very hard water supply, yet retain some level of calcium, at a level below about 60 ppm calcium carbonate. In addition, chlorine can be retained in the water so that if the water, after treatment, is stored for any length of time, it retains at least some of its bactericidal qualities. Bicarbonate species may also be retained at levels that provide better tasting water. Fluoride may also be retained so that additional fluoride supplements may be unnecessary. In addition, compounds such as silica, boron and other less ionizable species may also be retained at desirable levels greater than other CEDI methods. By retaining some of these trace materials, such as boron and silica, the properties of the treated water may be improved over water which has had a greater amount of these materials removed. In some embodiments of the present invention, at least 80 or 90% of these compounds can be retained while more than 25%, 30% or 50% of hardness contributing compounds, such as calcium, are removed.


In addition, the invention provides for the addition of hydrogen (H2) to the water, which may contribute to reducing the corrosivity of the treated water. The addition of hydrogen to the water may manifest itself by a detectable increase in dissolved hydrogen or a resulting decrease in the concentration of oxidative species. This may provide for desirable anti-oxidant properties as well. The pH, if altered at all, is generally close to that of the supply water and thus will not have deleterious effects on equipment or systems that are designed to use un-softened tap water at approximately neutral pH.


The apparatus of the invention, while having a relatively small foot print and using less energy than many CEDI, or other, treatment systems, still can supply quantities of treated or softened water that satisfy peak domestic demand situations. It may be able to supply softened water continuously, as no recharging cycle is required and a reserve of treated water may be formed.


Furthermore, the method and apparatus of the present invention may provide treated water without increasing the ionic load discharged from the treatment system. Conventional chemical treatment systems may require recharging with, for example, sodium chloride, that in turn is substituted for hardness species that are removed from the water. This means that both the hardness species and the substituted species are present in either the softened water or in discharged brine. This may add to the ionic load of waste water discharged from the home and may result in, for example, harm to ground water. Some embodiments of the present invention, however, may discharge only that ionic material that enters the home via the feed water. Furthermore, the total amount of waste water discharged as a result of the softening process may be significantly less than that with conventionally softened waters, for example, less than 10% or 5% of the volume of water treated.


One embodiment of a system of the invention is illustrated schematically in FIG. 3 which shows a water softening system 10 that may be used in a variety of installations, such as in a home. Feed water is supplied at point of entry 14, that may be, for example, well water or a municipal water supply.


At tee 24 water can enter either or both of conduits 26 and 28. Water passing through conduit 26 is typically directed to conduit 94 at tee 22 and feeds storage vessel 12 after passing by pressure indicator 20a and through inlet 62. When demand for water exists downstream of the storage device, water exits through outlet 64, passes by pressure sensor 20B and enters either conduit 96, conduit 98 or both depending on the demand source. Conduit 98 leads past pressure sensor 20d and valves 32a and 32b to service point 18. Service point 18 may be fluidly connected to a plumbing system or may be selectively joined to a specific point of use, such as appliance or bath.


Water that passes through conduit 96 may enter either conduit 52 or conduit 54, or both. In one configuration, water entering conduit 52 is directed by valve 32c to conduit 70 and pump 30a. After passing through conduit 72 and optional pretreatment device 28a which may be, for example, a carbon filter, particulate filter, or aeration device, the water is directed to conduit 60 at which point it enters electrodeionization module 100. Water entering via conduit 60 is purified by passing through one or more ion-depleting (depleting) compartments and may also pass through an electrode compartment, for example, the cathode compartment.


By plumbing the depleting compartments (where treated, product water is produced) either upstream or downstream of the cathode compartment, the system can be grounded via the cathode. This may be particularly advantageous in a household setting, as it may reduce safety hazards for the consumer. Furthermore, hydrogen gas that may be formed at the cathode can be dissolved into the product water passing through, resulting in a product water that may be less corrosive than had the water bypassed the cathode compartment. Product water may feed (or receive water from) the cathode, the anode, or both. If the product water communicates with both electrodes, the system may be plumbed so that the depleting compartments are in series or parallel with the electrode compartments. After exiting electrodeionization module 100 via conduit 62 the purified water may be directed by valve 32e to conduit 92 and pressure reading device 20c. The water then proceeds to tee 22 and is directed to conduit 94 prior to entering storage vessel 12. Thus, storage vessel 12 may include purified water from conduit 92 as well as untreated, or minimally treated, water that is provided from point of entry 14. Storage vessel 12 may be configured so that these two water sources are mixed, or alternatively, that the two water sources are segregated, for example, one of the water sources may enter the bottom of storage vessel 12 and proceed in plug-flow manner upwardly to outlet 64. Performance of electrodeionization module 100 may be improved by pretreatment that includes the removal of chlorine, a municipally treated water supply may be passed through a chlorine reducing filter such as carbon filter 28a or another pre-treatment device prior to entry into electrodeionization module 100.


Pre-treatment devices may also be placed elsewhere in the loop. Water that enters storage vessel 12 after being treated in electrodeionization module 100 may contain little or no chlorine (or alternative disinfectant) and to retain a residual chlorine level in storage tank 12 the water can be mixed with untreated water from point of entry 14. Preferably, the chlorinated water is added at a rate adequate to result in a mixed water that contains enough chlorine to inhibit bacteriologic activity. Active chlorine refers to those chlorine containing species that exhibit anti-microbial activity. An effective chlorine concentration is defined herein as a concentration of active chlorine compounds, for example, sodium hypochlorite, that inhibits the growth of bacteria, such as e-Coli, in storage vessel 12. Therefore, the ratio at which the feed water and treated water are mixed in storage vessel 12 may be dependent upon a number of factors including the efficiency of electrodeionization device 100, a desired effective chlorine concentration, the rate at which water contained in storage vessel 12 will be depleted, the temperature of storage vessel 12 and the source and quality of the feed water. Of course, if well water or another source of untreated water is used, maintenance of an effective disinfectant level may be disregarded.


While water is being recycled through the purification loop, additional water may be supplied via conduit 54 to valve 32d where it is directed to conduit 88, pump 30b, conduit 90, pretreatment unit 28b and conduit 80 prior to entering electrodeionization module 100. From conduit 80, water may feed one or more ion-concentrating (concentrating) compartments which may also be plumbed in series with the anode compartment. The anode compartment may lie either upstream or downstream of the concentrating compartment. By passing through the anode compartment, the pH of the water can be lowered and may result in water having a lower LSI. The lower LSI, which may be reduced to less than 0 (non-scaling), decreases the scaling potential of the water and thus provides for a lower maintenance, higher water recovery, increased longevity and more reliable system. Concentrate exiting electrodeionization module 100 typically enters conduit 82 and can be directed by valve 32f to conduits 84 and 64 where a portion of the concentrate may be discharged to waste either constantly or intermittently via valve 32g and drain 26. An additional portion of the water may enter conduit 66 and can be recycled to the electrodeionization module 100 via conduit 86 and valve 32d. In this manner, a concentrate solution may accept ions until a specific level is reached, for example, a pre-chosen LSI, so that a minimal amount of water can be discharged while maintaining a non-scaling environment throughout the loop. Water conservation can be improved further by using the concentrate for applications such as irrigation, that do not require softened water.


If a polarity reversal system or technique is used, the previously described loops can be switched so that the purification loop operates as the concentrating loop and the concentrating loop operates as the purification loop. In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, when the polarity of the anode and cathode are switched, the function of the concentrating and depleting compartments are also switched and pump 30a, pre-treatment device 28a, conduit 60 and conduit 62, as well as valve 32e each become part of the concentrating loop. Likewise, pump 30b, pre-treatment device 28b, conduits 80 and 82 and valve 32f become part of the purified loop supplying water to storage vessel 12. Thus, not only are the electrodeionization module compartments switched but all of the associated parts such as pre-treatment devices, pumps, valves, gauges and tees possibly excepting valve 32g are alternated between carrying purified water and concentrate water, resulting in decreased opportunity for prolonged scaling and increased opportunity for the dissolution of any scale that may have formed. This has proved particularly advantageous in reducing scaling in components such as valves, orifices, filters or tees. Reverse polarity cycles may be based on a number of factors, including time, source water quality, temperature, purified water quality, desired water quality and water use rates.


In addition to providing for effective levels of chlorine in storage tank 12, the system can be operated to maintain levels of other components such as bicarbonate, fluoride, silica and boron. The electrodeionization module 100 may contain ion exchange material and may be operated at a current and flow rate designed to minimize the removal of some or all of those species. In addition, some of the calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese or other hardness components present in the water may be retained to provide a purified water containing, for example, about 200, 300, 400 or 500 ppm hardness. This may result in a water that is less corrosive, and exhibits better aesthetic qualities than does water which has been reduced to a lower level of hardness. By removing, for example, about 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60% of the divalent cations in a single pass through the electrodeionization device, the device may require less power and a smaller foot print than would a device designed to more completely remove divalent cations from the water in a single pass.


In accordance with further embodiments, the systems and techniques of the present invention can comprise a post treatment system of subsystem capable of destroying or rendering inactive any bacteria that may be delivered to a point of use. For example, the post treatment system can comprise an apparatus or device that can irradiate treated or purified water with actinic radiation or expose with ozone or remove any bacteria by ultrafiltration and/or microfiltration.


In accordance with still further embodiments, the systems and techniques of the present invention can comprise providing systems and methods for disinfecting any wetted component of the treatment system by, for example, delivering or exposing at least a portion of the wetted component to a disinfectant such as halogen, a halogen donor, and/or a oxidizing compound such peroxygen compounds.


Example

As water treated with a CEDI system may contain reduced levels of TDS, pH and LSI when compared to untreated water, CEDI treated water was tested to determine how corrosive the product water might be. These results may be of particular importance when the CEDI treated water is to be used in a system including copper plumbing, such as many residential water systems. Specifically, water treated according to one embodiment of the invention was tested for copper corrosivity side-by-side with untreated water, CEDI treated water, and water treated by a conventional softening system. The corrosion, or leach, test was performed on 1″ diameter×2″ long copper pipes as coupons. The samples included CEDI treated water (2 configurations) as the challenge water with untreated water and softened water as two controls.


The untreated water (HARD) was well-water from Northbrook, Ill. having a TDS level of about 490 ppm, a hardness of about 18 gpg and a pH of about 7.8. The LSI of the untreated water ranged from about 0.8 to about 1. Conventionally softened water (SOFT) was obtained by treating the well-water with a 9″ softener containing about 1 cu.ft. of standard CULLEX® resin available from Culligan Corporation, Northbrook, Ill. CEDI water was produced in trial 1 with a system that did not include an inline reservoir. In trial 2, CEDI treated water (PRODUCT) was obtained at the tank outlet of the inline reservoir of the CEDI system illustrated in FIG. 3. Thus, trial 2 included passing CEDI product water through the depleting compartments and then through the cathode compartment of the CEDI module.


The test coupons were prepared by cutting a 1″ diameter copper pipe into about 2″ long pieces and trimming them to remove all burrs. The coupons were rinsed in acetone followed by RO water to remove any grease and metal shavings from the cutting operation. The coupons were each cleaned in about 150 mls of 2N HCl solution for about 1 minute and sequestered in a neutralizing solution. They were then stored in a dessicator overnight after being rinsed again in RO water and wiped clean. A total of 12 coupons were prepared for trial 2.


Each category of water was set aside into five 500-ml beakers. Each of the samples of water were sampled periodically and in similar patterns. The samples were tested as follows:


Trial 1—


The first trial included fewer samples than Trial 2 and corrosion analysis was performed under stagnant conditions. The product water samples were taken from the system and analyzed at day 1, day 4 and day 12. Water was treated in a low flow CEDI system without an inline reservoir. The water was passed once through the depleting compartments (not through the cathode) under the following conditions:

    • 25 cell pairs—low flow small stack with continuous duty, once through operation
    • Compartment size: 7.5″×1.2″ wide
    • Resin filling: 60% IRA-458 Anion Resin, 40% SF-120 Cation Resin
    • Concentrate re-circulation and product discharge flow rate: ˜1 l/min
    • Waste/reject continuous discharge flow rate: ˜500 ml/min
    • Electrode continuous flow rate: ˜300 ml/min per electrode. Fresh feed water sent to electrode compartments
    • Applied voltage=36 V, or 1.45V/cell
    • Feed Conductivity=740 μS
    • Product obtained from a once through operation


Corrosion results from Trial 1 are reported in FIGS. 5 and 7 and provide a comparison of raw water, conventionally softened water and the water produced by the CEDI system, as described above.


Trial 2—

  • A—Stagnant water was used as a control (control) without any coupons. Samples of stagnant water not containing a coupon were analyzed on the 1st, 5th and 12th day, as were samples C, D and E (see below).
  • B—Each of the three waters (changing) was placed in a separate beaker and the water was changed periodically to allow the coupon immersed to come into contact with fresh water. This was done to observe the effect of fresh water on leaching. The exchanged water was analyzed each time the water was changed. The water in these samples was changed on the 1st, 5th, 9th and the 12th day.
  • C—A coupon was immersed in each of the three waters (stagnant) for exactly one day. The water was sent for analysis after one day.
  • D—A coupon was immersed in each of the three waters (stagnant) for 5 days. The water was sent for analyses after five days of stagnation.
  • E—A coupon was immersed in each of the three waters (stagnant) for 12 days. The water was sent for analyses after 12 days of stagnation.


Trial 2 was performed with a CEDI system using an inline reservoir and product-through-cathode technology under the following conditions:

    • 25 cell pairs—product through cathode stack with inline reservoir/tank system
    • Compartment size: 7.5″×1.2″ wide
    • Resin filling: 60% IRA-458 Anion Resin, 40% SF-120 Cation Resin
    • Concentrate re-circulation and product re-circulation flow rate: ˜1.4 l/min
    • Waste/reject flush (flushed periodically) flow rate: ˜200 ml/min
    • Product water through cathode, concentrate re-circ. flow through anode
    • Applied voltage=51V, or 2.04 V/cell
    • Feed Conductivity=740 μS
    • Sample of product water collected from tank at set point of about 220 microsiemens.


Data from Trial 2 are presented below in FIG. 8. A comparison of the copper concentration, pH, LSI and alkalinity of the water treated by the CEDI system (PRODUCT), conventionally treated soft water (SOFT) and untreated hard water (HARD) is provided in Tables 1-4 below.









TABLE 1







Cu Concentration in ppm











PRODUCT
SOFT
HARD
















Day
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing



















0
0


0


0.004




1
0
0.17
0.142
0
0.289
0.318
0.005
0.309
0.273


5
0
0.538
0.493
0
0.685
0.752
0.006
0.764
0.741


9


0.418


0.703


0.922


12
0
0.529
0.489
0
0.843
0.725
0
0.867
1.101
















TABLE 2







pH











PRODUCT
SOFT
HARD
















Day
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing



















0
7.3


8


7.9




1
7.8
7.7
7.7
8.2
8.3
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.2


5
8.2
8
7.9
8.7
8.7
8.5
8.2
8.5
8.5


9


8


8.6


8.4


12
8.2
8.2
8
8.8
8.8
8.6
8.4
8.7
8.5
















TABLE 3







LSI @ 22 deg. C.











PRODUCT
SOFT
HARD
















Day
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing



















0
−1.3


−1.7


0.6




1
−0.7
−0.8
−0.8
−1.4
−1.3
−1.5
1
0.9
0.9


5
−0.4
−0.6
−0.7
−0.9
−1
−0.8
0.8
1.2
1.2


9


−0.7


−1.6


1.1


12
−0.4
−0.4
−0.6
−0.9
−0.9
−0.5
0.4
1.4
1.2
















TABLE 4







Alkalinity @ 22 deg. C.











PRODUCT
SOFT
HARD
















Day
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing
Control
Stagnant
Changing



















0
47


197


198




1
48
48
48
201.3
202
198
196.3
198
198


5
48
48
47
217
212
198
165
208
207


9


44


218


207


12
49
48
47
217
216
207
104
220
211










TDS levels: CDI treated water—about 135 ppm, Soft water—about 480 ppm, Hard water—about 490 ppm.



FIG. 4 illustrates graphically the results under stagnant conditions from Trial 2. FIG. 5 illustrates graphically the results under stagnant conditions from Trial 1. Both FIGS. 4 and 5 show that the CEDI treated water is less corrosive than both the feed water and the conventionally softened water.



FIG. 6 illustrates graphically the results from Trial 2 when the water samples where intermittently changed. Again, the CEDI product water of the present invention was consistently less corrosive than both the feed water and the conventionally softened water. FIG. 7 illustrates the current used and the conductivity of the water produced in trial 1. FIG. 8 illustrates the current used and the conductivity of the water produced in trial 2 and shows improved water quality over that achieved in trial 1 (FIG. 7).


The results show that the concentration of copper leached in all trials and under all conditions was the lowest in the CEDI treated samples. The CEDI water had lower pH values than both the conventionally softened and the hard water. As expected, the pH, alkalinity and LSI values in the conventionally softened and the CEDI treated water samples increased with stagnation. The LSI and alkalinity values for untreated hard water decreased with stagnation. The concentration of copper leached increased with stagnation except in the CEDI treated water samples where the level of copper leached stabilized out after 5 days, as shown in FIG. 4.


Thus, the water treated using the apparatus of FIG. 3 (product through cathode) resulted in reduced copper leaching despite exhibiting a lower pH, a lower (negative) LSI and a lower alkalinity than either the hard feed water or the conventionally softened water. In addition, the CEDI water of trial 2 was significantly less conductive (purer) than that of trial 1, yet was as non-corrosive as was the higher conductivity water. This means the method and apparatus of trial 2 may be particularly suitable for use in a water supply system presenting copper pipes or other materials where corrosion may be a concern. As defined herein, a water is considered to be less corrosive if it exhibits a lower copper concentration when subjected to one or more of the testing procedures described above. The product water of the present invention therefore may be less corrosive than either the feed water or the conventionally softened water.


Those skilled in the art would readily appreciate that all parameters and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that actual parameters and configurations will depend upon the specific application for which the systems and methods of the present invention are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. For example, those skilled in the art may recognize that the system, and components thereof, according to the present invention may further comprise a network of systems or be a component of a system such as a household or residential management system. Further, the systems and techniques of the present invention has been described in terms of an electrodeionization device; however, other electrochemical devices or systems may be utilized as a treatment apparatus that reduces a concentration or removes, at least partially, any undesirable species in a fluid to be treated. Other suitable electrochemical devices can include electrodialysis apparatus and capacitive deionization apparatus. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. The present invention is directed to each individual feature, system, or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems or methods, if such features, systems or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method of treating water comprising: providing water to be treated into a storage vessel;passing a first water stream from the storage vessel through a depleting compartment of an electrodeionization device;applying an electric current through the electrodeionization device to produce a second water stream from the depleting compartment having a Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) of less than about 0;passing the second water stream through a cathode compartment of the electrodeionization device to produce a treated water stream; andintroducing at least a portion of the treated water stream into the storage vessel.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the treated water stream is made less corrosive by reducing the concentration of oxidative species in the water stream.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising supplying at least a portion of water from the storage vessel for a household consumption selected from the group consisting of bathing, laundering, and dishwashing.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising circulating a concentrate through the concentrating and anode compartments of the electrodeionization device.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising discharging to waste a portion of the concentrate circulating through the concentrating and anode compartments.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein all of the water from the depleting compartment is passed through the cathode compartment.
  • 7. A method of providing potable water comprising: providing water be treated;introducing a first portion of the water to be treated into a storage vessel;passing a first water stream comprising a second portion of the water to be treated through a cathode compartment of an electrodeionization device to produce a second water stream;circulating a third water stream through a concentrating compartment and through an anode compartment of the electrodeionization device;treating the second water stream in a depleting compartment of the electrodeionization device to produce treated potable water having a Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) of less than about 0; andintroducing the treated potable water into the storage vessel.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the treated potable water is made less corrosive by reducing the concentration of oxidative species in the first water stream.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, further comprising supplying at least a portion of water from the reservoir for household consumption.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising post treating the at least a portion of water from the reservoir with at least one of actinic radiation, ultrafiltration, and microfiltration, prior to supplying the water for household consumption.
US Referenced Citations (217)
Number Name Date Kind
2514415 Rasch Jul 1950 A
2535035 Briggs Dec 1950 A
2681319 Bodamer Jun 1954 A
2681320 Bodamer Jun 1954 A
2788319 Pearson Apr 1957 A
2794777 Pearson Jun 1957 A
2815320 Kollsman Dec 1957 A
2854394 Kollsman Sep 1958 A
2923674 Kressman Feb 1960 A
2943989 Kollsman Jul 1960 A
3014855 Kressman Dec 1961 A
3074864 Gaysowski Jan 1963 A
3099615 Kollsman Jul 1963 A
3148687 Dosch Sep 1964 A
3149061 Parsi Sep 1964 A
3149062 Gottschal et al. Sep 1964 A
3165460 Zang et al. Jan 1965 A
3291713 Parsik Dec 1966 A
3330750 McRae et al. Jul 1967 A
3341441 Giuffrida et al. Sep 1967 A
3375208 Duddy Mar 1968 A
3627703 Kojima et al. Dec 1971 A
3630378 Bauman Dec 1971 A
3645884 Gilliland Feb 1972 A
3686089 Korngold Aug 1972 A
3755135 Johnson Aug 1973 A
3869375 Ono et al. Mar 1975 A
3869376 Tejeda Mar 1975 A
3870033 Faylor et al. Mar 1975 A
3876565 Takashima et al. Apr 1975 A
3989615 Kiga et al. Nov 1976 A
4032452 Davis Jun 1977 A
4033850 Kedem et al. Jul 1977 A
4089758 McAloon May 1978 A
4102752 Rugh, II Jul 1978 A
4116889 Chlanda et al. Sep 1978 A
4119581 Rembaum et al. Oct 1978 A
4130473 Eddleman Dec 1978 A
4153761 Marsh May 1979 A
4167551 Tamura et al. Sep 1979 A
4191811 Hodgdon Mar 1980 A
4197206 Karn Apr 1980 A
4216073 Goldstein Aug 1980 A
4217200 Kedem et al. Aug 1980 A
4226688 Kedem et al. Oct 1980 A
4228000 Hoeschler Oct 1980 A
4294933 Kihara et al. Oct 1981 A
4298442 Giuffrida Nov 1981 A
4321145 Carlson Mar 1982 A
4330654 Ezzell et al. May 1982 A
4358545 Ezzell et al. Nov 1982 A
4374232 Davis Feb 1983 A
4430226 Hegde et al. Feb 1984 A
4465573 O'Hare Aug 1984 A
4473450 Nayak et al. Sep 1984 A
4505797 Hodgdon et al. Mar 1985 A
4574049 Pittner Mar 1986 A
4614576 Goldstein Sep 1986 A
4632745 Giuffrida et al. Dec 1986 A
4636296 Kunz Jan 1987 A
4655909 Furuno et al. Apr 1987 A
4661411 Martin et al. Apr 1987 A
4671863 Tejeda Jun 1987 A
4687561 Kunz Aug 1987 A
4702810 Kunz Oct 1987 A
4707240 Parsi et al. Nov 1987 A
4747929 Siu et al. May 1988 A
4747955 Kunin May 1988 A
4751153 Roth Jun 1988 A
4753681 Giuffrida et al. Jun 1988 A
4770793 Treffry-Goatley et al. Sep 1988 A
4804451 Palmer Feb 1989 A
4808287 Hark Feb 1989 A
4830721 Bianchi et al. May 1989 A
4849102 Latour et al. Jul 1989 A
4871431 Parsi Oct 1989 A
4872958 Suzuki et al. Oct 1989 A
4915803 Morris Apr 1990 A
4925541 Giuffrida et al. May 1990 A
4931160 Giuffrida Jun 1990 A
4956071 Giuffrida et al. Sep 1990 A
4964970 O'Hare Oct 1990 A
4969983 Parsi Nov 1990 A
4983267 Moeglich et al. Jan 1991 A
5026465 Katz et al. Jun 1991 A
5030672 Hann et al. Jul 1991 A
5066375 Parsi et al. Nov 1991 A
5066402 Anselme et al. Nov 1991 A
5073268 Saito et al. Dec 1991 A
5082472 Mallouk et al. Jan 1992 A
5084148 Kazcur et al. Jan 1992 A
5092970 Kaczur et al. Mar 1992 A
5106465 Kaczur et al. Apr 1992 A
5116509 White May 1992 A
5120416 Parsi et al. Jun 1992 A
5126026 Chlanda Jun 1992 A
5128043 Wildermuth Jul 1992 A
5154809 Oren et al. Oct 1992 A
5166220 McMahon Nov 1992 A
5176828 Proulx Jan 1993 A
5196115 Andelman Mar 1993 A
5203976 Parsi et al. Apr 1993 A
5211823 Giuffrida et al. May 1993 A
5223103 Kazcur et al. Jun 1993 A
H1206 Thibodeaux et al. Jul 1993 H
5240579 Kedem Aug 1993 A
5254227 Cawlfield et al. Oct 1993 A
5259936 Ganzi Nov 1993 A
5286354 Bard et al. Feb 1994 A
5292422 Liang et al. Mar 1994 A
5308466 Ganzi et al. May 1994 A
5308467 Sugo et al. May 1994 A
5316637 Ganzi et al. May 1994 A
5346624 Libutti et al. Sep 1994 A
5346924 Giuffrida Sep 1994 A
5356849 Matviya et al. Oct 1994 A
5358640 Zeiher et al. Oct 1994 A
5376253 Rychen et al. Dec 1994 A
5411641 Trainham, III et al. May 1995 A
5425858 Farmer Jun 1995 A
5425866 Sugo et al. Jun 1995 A
5434020 Cooper Jul 1995 A
5444031 Hayden Aug 1995 A
5451309 Bell Sep 1995 A
5458787 Rosin et al. Oct 1995 A
5460725 Stringfield Oct 1995 A
5460728 Klomp et al. Oct 1995 A
5489370 Lomasney et al. Feb 1996 A
5503729 Batchelder et al. Apr 1996 A
5518626 Birbara et al. May 1996 A
5518627 Tomoi et al. May 1996 A
5536387 Hill et al. Jul 1996 A
5538611 Otowa Jul 1996 A
5538655 Fauteux et al. Jul 1996 A
5539002 Watanabe Jul 1996 A
5547551 Bahar et al. Aug 1996 A
5558753 Gallagher et al. Sep 1996 A
5580437 Trainham, III et al. Dec 1996 A
5584981 Turner et al. Dec 1996 A
5593563 Denoncourt et al. Jan 1997 A
5599614 Bahar et al. Feb 1997 A
5670053 Collentro et al. Sep 1997 A
5679228 Batchelder et al. Oct 1997 A
5679229 Goldstein et al. Oct 1997 A
5714521 Kedem et al. Feb 1998 A
RE35741 Oren et al. Mar 1998 E
5736023 Gallagher et al. Apr 1998 A
5759373 Terada et al. Jun 1998 A
5762774 Tessier Jun 1998 A
5766479 Collentro et al. Jun 1998 A
5788826 Nyberg Aug 1998 A
5804055 Coin et al. Sep 1998 A
5814197 Batchelder et al. Sep 1998 A
5837124 Su et al. Nov 1998 A
5858191 DiMascio et al. Jan 1999 A
5868915 Ganzi et al. Feb 1999 A
5891328 Goldstein Apr 1999 A
5925240 Wilkins et al. Jul 1999 A
5928807 Elias Jul 1999 A
5954935 Neumeister et al. Sep 1999 A
5961805 Terada et al. Oct 1999 A
5980716 Horinouchi et al. Nov 1999 A
6056878 Tessier et al. May 2000 A
6099716 Molter et al. Aug 2000 A
6103125 Kuepper Aug 2000 A
6126805 Batchelder et al. Oct 2000 A
RE36972 Baker et al. Nov 2000 E
6146524 Story Nov 2000 A
6149788 Tessier et al. Nov 2000 A
6171374 Barton et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187154 Yamaguchi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187162 Mir Feb 2001 B1
6190528 Li et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190553 Lee Feb 2001 B1
6190558 Robbins Feb 2001 B1
6193869 Towe et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197174 Barber et al. Mar 2001 B1
6197189 Schwartz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214204 Gadkaree et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228240 Terada et al. May 2001 B1
6235166 Towe et al. May 2001 B1
6248226 Shinmei et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254741 Stuart et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258278 Tonelli et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267891 Tonelli et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274019 Kuwata Aug 2001 B1
6284124 DiMascio et al. Sep 2001 B1
6284399 Oko et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296751 Mir Oct 2001 B1
6303037 Tamura et al. Oct 2001 B1
6344122 Deguchi et al. Feb 2002 B1
6375812 Leonida Apr 2002 B1
6402916 Sampson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402917 Emery et al. Jun 2002 B1
6482304 Emery et al. Nov 2002 B1
6607647 Wilkins et al. Aug 2003 B2
6607668 Rela Aug 2003 B2
6627073 Hirota et al. Sep 2003 B2
6648307 Nelson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6649037 Liang et al. Nov 2003 B2
6766812 Gadini Jul 2004 B1
6783666 Takeda et al. Aug 2004 B2
6808608 Srinivasan et al. Oct 2004 B2
6824662 Liang et al. Nov 2004 B2
20010003329 Sugaya et al. Jun 2001 A1
20020092769 Garcia et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020189951 Liang et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030080467 Andrews et al. May 2003 A1
20030089609 Liang et al. May 2003 A1
20030098266 Shiue et al. May 2003 A1
20030155243 Sferrazza Aug 2003 A1
20030201235 Chidambaran et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040079700 Wood et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040089551 Liang et al. May 2004 A1
20050109703 Newenhizen May 2005 A1
20060060532 Davis Mar 2006 A1
20060231403 Riviello Oct 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (71)
Number Date Country
B-1862992 Oct 1992 AU
2316012 Nov 2001 CA
1044411 Aug 1990 CN
1 201 055 Sep 1965 DE
3238280 Apr 1984 DE
4016000 Nov 1991 DE
44 18 812 Dec 1995 DE
199 42 347 Mar 2001 DE
0170895 Feb 1986 EP
0 503 589 Sep 1992 EP
0 621 072 Oct 1994 EP
0 621 072 Oct 1994 EP
0 680 932 Nov 1995 EP
0803474 Oct 1997 EP
0 870 533 Oct 1998 EP
1 068 901 Jan 2001 EP
1068901 Jan 2001 EP
1075 868 Feb 2001 EP
1 101 790 May 2001 EP
1 106 241 Jun 2001 EP
1172145 Jan 2002 EP
1222954 Jul 2002 EP
1506941 Feb 2005 EP
776469 Jun 1957 GB
877239 Sep 1961 GB
880344 Oct 1961 GB
893051 Apr 1962 GB
942762 Nov 1963 GB
1048026 Nov 1966 GB
1137679 Dec 1968 GB
1 381 681 Jan 1975 GB
1448533 Sep 1976 GB
54-5888 Jan 1979 JP
07-155750 Jun 1995 JP
07-265865 Oct 1995 JP
09-253643 Sep 1997 JP
11-42483 Feb 1999 JP
2001-79358 Mar 2001 JP
2001-79553 Mar 2001 JP
2001-104960 Apr 2001 JP
2001-113137 Apr 2001 JP
2001-113279 Apr 2001 JP
2001-113280 Apr 2001 JP
2001-121152 May 2001 JP
2003094064 Apr 2003 JP
2005007347 Jan 2005 JP
2005007348 Jan 2005 JP
114 874 Aug 1999 RO
216622 Nov 1972 SU
990256 Jan 1983 SU
1118389 Oct 1984 SU
WO 9211089 Jul 1992 WO
WO 9532052 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9532791 Dec 1995 WO
WO 9622162 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9725147 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9746491 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9746492 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9811987 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9817590 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9820972 May 1998 WO
WO 9858727 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9858727 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9939810 Aug 1999 WO
WO 0030749 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0064325 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0075082 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0149397 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0204357 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0214224 Feb 2002 WO
WO 03086590 Oct 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050103723 A1 May 2005 US