The present disclosure generally relates to the field of water treatment. More particularly, but not limited to, the in situ electrochemical treatment of aqueous solutions used in and/or derived from agricultural systems, community systems and industrial systems. In aspects, in situ electrochemical treatment of aqueous nutrient solutions for use in agricultural systems inclusive of controlled environment agricultural systems.
Controlled Environment Agriculture (“CEA”) is an agricultural technology that enables the grower to manipulate a crop's environment to desired conditions for more sustainable food production allowing for the production of crops year-round. Controlled conditions may include light, carbon dioxide, temperature, humidity, water, pH levels and nutrients. CEA allows for local crop growth and includes for example greenhouse, hydroponics, aquaculture, and aquaponics and can be used both for food crops and non-food crops. CEA may also be used by researchers to study production of a desired plant in a maintained setting to obtain data for scientific study.
Current technologies to address water quality concerns in CEA include filtration, heat, ultraviolet radiation, ozone, hydrogen peroxide and chlorination, with each having drawbacks. For example, chlorination requires continuous addition of free chlorine to maintain disinfection targets which is problematic in terms of cost of free chlorine, the handling/management systems, worker safety handling hazardous chlorine-based disinfectants, and accumulation of toxic levels of chloride salts caused by the continuous addition of free chlorine.
There remains a need for making and delivering safe and healthier water sources used in agricultural, community and industrial water systems and in aspects safer sustainable fertigation water for CEA operators for crop security.
The discussion of the background herein is included to explain the context of the inventions described herein. This is not to be taken as an admission that any of the material referred to was published, known, or part of the common general knowledge as of the priority date of any of the claims.
Herein described are electrochemically treated aqueous solutions for use in agricultural, community and industrial water systems.
Herein described is an electrochemically treated aqueous solution derived/made from agricultural, community and/or industrial sources.
Herein described is a safe and sustainable electrochemically treated fertigation water source for use in agricultural systems, such as Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA), that help to increase crop security and reduce the amount of use, thus reliance on, of chemical fertilizers.
Herein described are stable nutrient solutions made by in situ electrochemical treatment. The nutrient solutions (a fertigation water) provide a stable source of nutrients to plants during plant irrigation. The nutrient solutions are recycled within an irrigation system and during the recycling can be further electrochemically re-treated or continuously electrochemically re-treated within the irrigation system during the entire course of plant growth and maintenance. The in situ electrochemical treatment methods of the invention maintain a stable nutrient source for plants in the fertigation water, disinfect pathogens in the fertigation water, degrade undesired contaminants such as pesticides in the fertigation water, and mineralize any organic components to release inorganic ions solubilized in the fertigation water for uptake by plants. The in situ electrochemical treatment methods of the invention can maintain stable free chlorine concentrations below phytotoxic thresholds.
Herein described are in situ electrochemical treatment methods to make stable and sustainable nutrient solutions, in aspects inorganic or organic, for use as recyclable fertigation water for crops in CEA.
Herein described is a method to treat organic waste, the method comprising in situ electrochemical treatment of an organic waste solution to mineralize organic components therein to release soluble inorganic ions. The treated organic waste solution can be used as a fertigation water for crops in CEA in both soil and hydroponic systems.
Herein described are in situ electrochemical treatment methods to degrade agrichemical contaminants in fertigation water.
Herein described are in situ electrochemical treatment methods for degradation and solubilization of nutrients comprising for example one or more of nitrate, sulphate, ammonium, phosphate and calcium ions from organic waste materials such as but not limited to compost, bone meal, soya meal, manure and inedible biomass from plant production systems.
Herein described are in situ electrochemical treatment methods for mineralization of organic fertilizer solutions.
Herein described are in situ electrochemical treatment methods for recirculating nutrient solutions in CEA. In aspects for commercial floriculture production comprising plants propagated in soil.
Herein described is an in situ electrochemical treatment method for treating circulating nutrient solutions in hydroponic CEA.
Herein described are in situ electrochemical treatment methods to degrade recalcitrant organic pollutant contaminants found in aqueous solutions from community or industrial water sources such as for example municipal water, waste water and post-treatment outflow water. In aspects the organics are pesticides. The in situ electrochemical treatment methods of the invention can be used in conjunction with currently used water treatment and sewage treatment methods and facilities. The in situ electrochemical treatment methods can be incorporated to after conventional water treatment and after conventional sewage treatment.
The invention provides methods and systems for delivering crop security for CEA operators using fertigation water through the effective management of potential pathogen threats, chemical contaminant control, degradation of recalcitrant organic pollutants, and for more effective utilization of nutrients in the fertigation water for crop growth.
Fertigation is a process in which fertilizer is dissolved and distributed via the irrigation water (“fertigation water” or “fertigation solution” or “nutrient solution” are interchangeable). Herein provided are methods and systems of making and using secure “healthy” fertigation water. The invention overcomes the threats of using and re-cycling fertigation water with respect to pathogen distribution and proliferation resulting from the use of contaminated sources, the accumulation of phytotoxic chemical contaminants and/or organic pollutants under a water recycling protocol, the potential of nutrient imbalances that may occur in recirculated water, and contamination by pesticides.
The invention also provides methods and systems for delivering water security for community and industrial water systems. For example, municipal water sources, commercial water sources, wastewater and post-treatment outflow water can be treated using the in situ electrochemical methods and systems described herein. In aspects, a chloride containing water supply may be treated in accordance with methods of the invention to dechlorinate. This may be used in conjunction with post UV treatment.
A contaminant as referred to herein, is generally any polluting substance harmful (toxic) to the environment and living organisms such as animals, birds and humans. A contaminant in an aspect is an agrichemical, a chemical used in agriculture such as a pesticide. In a further aspect, the contaminant is not an agrichemical but a further recalcitrant organic pollutant such as for example Bisphenol A (BPA), Naproxen, Ibuprofen, Estrogens, Antibiotics, and Insulin.
The electrochemical methods described herein provide at least one or more of the following: pathogen inactivation, degradation of recalcitrant organic pollutants; degradation of contaminants; providing sustained nutrients; and mineralizing organic materials into solubilized nutrients. The methods and systems provide a secure fertigation water and secure re-circulated fertigation water for use in CEA and other applications.
The electrochemical treatment of fertigation water has many benefits for use in Controlled Environment Agriculture for both soil and hydroponic systems. The methods can incorporate the use of any organic waste material including but not limited to compost, bone meal, soya meal, manure and inedible biomass from plant production systems. This is beneficial to decrease the reliance on synthetic fertilizers.
The invention in aspects provides novel and effective methods and systems that can be deployed in isolation or as part of an integrated water management system in municipal, industrial and CEA operations. With respect to CEA operations, utilizing fertigation water (i.e. fertigation) provides source water treatment to ensure crop security. Encompassed are both single pass (initially treated) fertigation water and re-cycled (captured, re-used and retreated) fertigation water to provide a safe source of fertigation water to ensure crop security. The methods and systems also help to conserve water as the fertigation water is recycled for re-use as part of a water management system.
The in situ electrochemical methods of the invention are capable of efficiently meeting the nutritional needs of crops. Further, nutrient levels of the treated fertigation water remain substantially unchanged, i.e. are sustained. In an aspect, the method provides for increases in some essential ions serving as an enrichment of the fertigation water for improving growth conditions for crops.
In further aspects, the method incorporates electrochemistry to enrich nutrients (e.g. nitrogen) in the fertigation water during treatment thereof.
Advantageously, the method also allows for nutrients contained in the fertigation water to be conserved. Macronutrient ions are substantially unaffected. The loss of total nitrogen levels is limited and may be controlled by pH adjustment of the fertigation water during treatment. Thus the methods of the invention provide a sustained, safe nutrient solution for CEA.
In one embodiment, the system incorporates the use of dimensionally stable anodes (DSAs) such as, but not limited to RuO2.
In a further non-limiting embodiment, the system incorporates the use of boron doped diamond electrodes (BDD) to continuously produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as O2, O3, H2O2 and OH. In aspects, this is a regenerative in situ oxidant generating method for the control of oxidant-susceptible pathogens in aqueous solutions. In aspects in fertigation water in commercial CEA. Advantageously, any chlorate species formed (typically <2 ug/L) are below acceptable levels (e.g. below 2 mg/L).
The use of BDD conserves the nutrients contained in the fertigation water. The loss of total nitrogen levels is limited and may be controlled by pH adjustment of the fertigation water during treatment. Advantageously, organic components of the fertilizer or other organic contaminants in the fertigation water are degraded releasing ammonium, nitrate, sulphate and calcium that enrich the fertigation water for improving the growth conditions for crops. As such in a further aspect, the invention incorporates electrochemistry to advantageously increase nutrient availability and sustainability within the fertigation water for crop growth. Electrochemical mineralization of the fertigation water degrades organic matter therein containing nitrogen, e.g., proteins and nucleic acids, to release ammonia/ammonium that is oxidized to nitrate ions essential for crop growth. This enriches the fertigation water as it is being treated since the released ammonium ions and nitrate become available for crop growth.
In further aspects using BDD, additional chloride may be added that is also regenerated without a build-up of free chlorine while maintaining acceptable low chloride effluent levels in the treated fertigation water. In this aspect, a combination of oxidative species and free chlorine are regenerated at disinfecting amounts that may target the same or different pathogens in the fertigation water, while still maintaining safe levels of chlorine and safe levels of chlorate. Thus effluent free chlorine and chlorate species concentrations remain below phytotoxic thresholds.
Fertigation water for treatment in accordance with the invention may comprise inorganic and/or organic fertilizer. Fertilizers containing NH4+ may be used, with lower current densities which do not release chloramines at concentrations higher than the phytotoxic threshold (0.2 mg/L NH4Cl). At higher current densities for certain aspects, tertiary treatment methods such as UV light may be further incorporated to produce crops without negative impacts on growth. Furthermore, NO3 based fertilizers without the presence of NH4+ may be also used. The electrochemical process with BDD electrodes can be successfully used for mineralizing organic materials and solubilizing nutrients in the fertigation water.
The fertigation water may be treated, then used to irrigate crops. Treated fertigation water used to irrigate crops may be collected (for example the run off collected) and pooled for retreatment and re-use. Untreated fertigation water may also be mixed with treated fertigation water for treatment.
In aspects of the invention, the pH of the fertigation water during treatment is at least about 5.4. In further aspects, the pH is between about 5.4 to about 8.5. In further aspects, the pH is about 5.5 to 6.5, this pH is favorable for chloride and nitrogen species therein. In any of these ranges, all integers are included.
In aspects of the invention, the current density used in the methods is at least about 0.76 mA/cm2. In further aspects the current density is about 0.76 mA/cm2 to about 9.09 mA/cm2. In further aspects, the current density is at least about 1.14 mA/cm2, at least about 2.27 mA/cm2, at least about 3.41 mA/cm2, at least about 4.55 mA/cm2, at least about 6.82 mA/cm2 and at least about 9.09 mA/cm2. The effective current density range for use varies with contact times. In non-limiting aspects it may be about 0.76 to about 2.27 mA/cm2, or about 0.76 to about 9.09 mA/cm2, or about 0.76 to about 1.14 mA/cm2 inclusive of any subranges within these ranges as understood by one of skill in the art. One of skill in the art may recognize that in particular aspects, higher current densities may be applied for different periods of time or combinations of current densities may be used for different periods of time, or a gradual increase and/or decrease of current density over time may be used.
In aspects of the invention the residence time (time in contact with electrodes) may be up to about 1 minute, up to about 2 minutes, up to about 3 minutes, up to about 4 minutes, up to about 5 minutes, up to about 6 minutes, up to about 7 minutes, up to about 8 minutes, up to about 9 minutes, up to about 10 minutes, up to 20 minutes or longer. All time periods within these ranges is included. In certain aspects longer residence times may be desired. The residence time is affected by flow rate. Higher flow rates provide less residence time. Flow rates may be up to about 720 mL/min or more.
In aspects of the invention the methods are conducted under ambient light at room temperatures. It is understood however, that lighting and temperatures may be further adjusted.
In accordance with another aspect, is an in situ oxidant producing method for the treatment of fertigation water, comprising:
continuously regenerating oxidative species in an effective amount to control a pathogen in said fertigation water; and optionally
degrading nitrogen containing matter in said fertigation water to release ammonium ions and nitrate.
In aspects, is an electrochemical flow cell (EFC) that is outfitted with dimensionally stable anodes (DSA), in aspects ruthenium dioxide (RuO2). In the methods, an aqueous solution to be treated, for example fertigation water, is pumped into the EFC, where it contacts and flows through the electrically charged DSAs and exits the EFC for collection. Pathogen inactivation is achieved by regenerative mediated electrolysis, whereby chloride ions in the flowing fertigation water are transformed to free chlorine forms (e.g. hypochlorous acid) that neutralizes pathogens while simultaneously releasing chloride ions back to the solution where the chloride ions migrate back to the anode through electrostatic migration where again, the chloride ions can be transformed to hypochlorous acid for pathogen neutralization.
In further aspects, methods of the invention are achieved through the use of an electrochemical flow cell (EFC) that is outfitted with BDD anodes. In the methods, an aqueous solution to be treated, for example fertigation water, is pumped into the EFC, where it contacts and flows through the electrically charged BDDs and exits the EFC for collection. Pathogen inactivation is achieved by regenerative mediated electrolysis, whereby oxidants are generated in situ (a combination of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as O2, O3, H2O2 and OH) that neutralizes pathogens by attacking pathogens membrane, DNA, and other essential components needed for its survival. The treated fertigation water is chemically decomposed from recalcitrant organic pollutants. Optionally, chlorine may be added that is also regenerated with stable chloride levels being maintained and safe free chlorine levels.
Treatment of an aqueous solution containing a contaminant(s) includes electrochemical treatment using dimensionally stable anodes (DSAs) or using BDD (boron doped diamond electrodes) providing electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOP) to degrade the contaminant(s). Contaminants may be agrichemicals or recalcitrant organic pollutants. Aqueous solutions comprising chloride ions may also be electrochemically treated as described herein.
In aspects of the present invention is the in situ electrochemical treatment of an aqueous solution through electrochemical cells incorporating DSA electrodes (such as, but not limited to RuO2) or BDD electrodes in order to degrade a contaminant(s) therein. In aspects the contaminant is an agrichemical such as a pesticide, for example glyphosate or paclobutrazol. Both DSA and BDD electrodes can be used in the methods to degrade glyphosate and paclobutrazol. Contaminants may also comprise recalcitrant organic pollutants such as bisphenol A (BPA), naproxen, ibuprofen, estrogens, antibiotics and insulin. The aqueous solution may be a municipal, agricultural or industrial water source.
The methods are effective to degrade, that is break down one or more pesticides present in aqueous solutions such as for example fertigation water, to safe(r) byproducts rendering the treated fertigation water non-toxic or substantially less toxic than non-treated fertigation water. Thus the degradation reduces the amount of the pesticide present in the fertigation water. Further, the treated fertigation water is also not toxic to crops for which it is used to irrigate.
In aspects of the present invention is a method for the in situ electrochemical treatment of aqueous solutions containing glyphosate, the method incorporating the use of dimensionally stable anodes (DSA) electrodes (such as, but not limited to RuO2) to degrade the glyphosate into less toxic by-products.
In aspects of the present invention is a method for the in situ electrochemical treatment of aqueous solutions containing glyphosate, the method incorporating the use of dimensionally stable anodes (DSA) electrodes (such as, but not limited to RuO2) to degrade the glyphosate resulting in treated solution with safe(r)/acceptable levels of glyphosate compared to untreated solution.
In aspects of the present invention is a method for the in situ electrochemical treatment of an aqueous solution containing paclobutazol, the method incorporating the use of BDD electrodes to generate reactive oxidative species that degrades the paclobutazol into less toxic by-products.
In aspects of the present invention is a method for the in situ electrochemical treatment of an aqueous solution containing paclobutazol, the method incorporating the use of BDD electrodes to generate reactive oxidative species to degrade the paclobutazol resulting in treated solution with safe(r)/acceptable levels of paclobutazol compared to untreated solution.
In any of the aforementioned methods the aqueous solution can be fertigation water (organic or inorganic), municipal water or industrial water the later which includes waste water and post-treatment outflow waste water. Encompassed are both single pass (initially treated) aqueous solutions and re-cycled (captured, re-used and retreated) aqueous solutions.
Encompassed are both single pass (initially treated) fertigation water and re-cycled (captured, re-used and retreated) fertigation water to provide a safe source of fertigation water to ensure crop security. The methods and systems help to remove/degrade contaminants such as pesticides from the fertigation water and further helps to conserve water as the fertigation water is recycled for re-use as part of a water management system. It is within the scope of the invention to combine different systems in the re-treated fertigation water. One of skill in the art would understand from the teachings presented herein that the fertigation water could first be treated using DSA electrodes and then after treatment, use and collection, be subjected to a further treatment using BDD electrodes. This can be also done in the reverse order. Alternatively, any combination of treatment cycles may be utilized.
The methods of the invention are useful for removing/degrading undesired agrichemicals such as pesticides from fertigation water while substantially maintaining nutritional needs of any crop being irrigated with the treated fertigation water.
The methods are surprisingly effective for providing crop security against undesired agrichemicals, that is, treating the fertigation water to remove a pesticide. Concentrations of glyphosate and paclobutrazol as demonstrated herein were for example 170 and 60 times higher, respectively, than typical concentrations found in Canadian surface water and were effectively removed demonstrating the effectiveness of the methods and systems described herein. Further, nutrient levels of the treated fertigation water may remain substantially at levels required for plant health/growth.
In aspects, the method incorporates electrochemistry to continuously remove/degrade one or more undesired agrichemicals in the fertigation water to less than toxic levels for a crop.
In an aspect, chloride concentrations may remain stable during treatment of the fertigation water and thus effluent free chlorine concentrations remain below phytotoxic thresholds (e.g. about 2.5 mg/L). Nutrients contained in the fertigation water may be conserved. The loss of total nitrogen levels is limited and may be controlled by pH adjustment of the fertigation water during treatment.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of the invention, a continuously regenerated combination of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as O2, O3, H2O2 and OH is employed to remove/degrade undesired agrichemicals. In this embodiment, the system incorporates the use of boron doped diamond electrodes (BDD) to continuously produce reactive oxygen species. In aspects, this is a regenerative in situ oxidant generating method for the control of oxidant-susceptible contaminants (agrichemicals, i.e. pesticides) in fertigation water in commercial CEA.
In this embodiment incorporating the use of BDD, the loss of total nitrogen levels is limited and may be controlled by pH adjustment of the fertigation water during treatment. The reduction/degradation of undesired agrichemicals using BDD may advantageously also degrade organic components of any fertilizer or other organic contaminants in the fertigation water releasing ammonium, nitrate, sulphate and calcium that enrich the fertigation water for improving the growth conditions for crops. As such in a further aspect, the invention incorporates electrochemistry to reduce/degrade a pesticide(s) and may advantageously increase nutrient availability within the fertigation water for crop growth. Electrochemical mineralization of the fertigation water degrades organic matter therein containing nitrogen, e.g., proteins and nucleic acids, to release ammonia/ammonium that is oxidized to nitrate ions essential for crop growth.
The in situ electrochemical methods of the invention can be used to effectively remove/degrade undesired agrichemicals used in agriculture. Undesired agrichemicals may generally include pesticides such as organophosphate pesticides and carbamate pesticides.
In aspects, the methods of the invention may be used to remove/degrade pesticides from fertigation water.
In aspects, the methods of the invention may be used to remove/degrade organophosphate pesticides and carbamate pesticides from fertigation water.
In aspects, the methods of the invention may be used to remove/degrade glyphosate and/or paclobutrazol from fertigation water.
In aspects, the methods of the invention may be used to remove/degrade aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) from fertigation water.
Glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) is a broad-spectrum systemic herbicide and crop desiccant. It is an organophosphorus compound, specifically a phosphonate, which acts by inhibiting the plant enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. It is used in commercial pesticide formulations such as for example Roundup™ and Glyfosm.
Paclobutrazol is a plant growth regulator (PGR) and also a triazole fungicide that inhibits the top growth on a plant while encouraging root growth. It is a known antagonist of the plant hormone gibberellin. Commercial formulations include for example Bonzi™ (Syngenta), Downsize™ (Greenleaf Chemical), Paczol™ (OHP), Piccolo™ and Piccolo 10XC™ (Fine Americas).
While the pesticides glyphosate and paclobutrazol (and AMPA) are described herein, it is understood by one of skill in the art that the methods of the invention can be used for a variety of different pesticides such as one or more of those listed in Table 2.
In further aspects, the methods of the invention the contaminant is a further recalcitrant organic pollutant and the methods may be used to remove/degrade for example Bisphenol A (BPA), Naproxen, Ibuprofen, Estrogens, Antibiotics, and Insulin.
Fertigation water for treatment in accordance with the invention may comprise chlorine, inorganic and/or organic fertilizer. The fertigation water may be treated, then used to irrigate crops. Treated fertigation water used to irrigate crops may be collected (for example the run off collected) and pooled for retreatment and re-use. This can be done multiple times using combinations of treatment. Untreated fertigation water may also be mixed with treated fertigation water for treatment.
The removal/degradation of pesticides is achieved by using electrochemical treatment of the fertigation water and adjusting one or more of: current density, residence time (flow rate) and pH. In aspects of the invention, the pH of the fertigation water during pesticide treatment is at least about 5.4. In further aspects, the pH is between about 5.4 to about 8.5. In further aspects, the pH is about 5.5 to 6.5, this pH is favourable for chloride and nitrogen species therein. In any of these ranges, all integers are included. In aspects of the invention, the current density used in the methods is at least about 0.76 mA/cm2. In further aspects the current density is about 0.76 mA/cm2 to about 9.09 mA/cm2. In further aspects, the current density is at least about 1.14 mA/cm2, at least about 2.27 mA/cm2, at least about 3.41 mA/cm2, at least about 4.55 mA/cm2, at least about 6.82 mA/cm2 and at least about 9.09 mA/cm2. The current density used in the methods is at about 2.27 mA/cm2. One of skill in the art may recognize that in particular aspects, higher current densities may be applied for different periods of time or combinations of current densities may be used for different periods of time, or a gradual increase and/or decrease of current density over time may be used.
In aspects of the invention the residence time may be up to about 1 minute, up to about 2 minutes, up to about 3 minutes, up to about 4 minutes, up to about 5 minutes, up to about 6 minutes, up to about 7 minutes, up to about 8 minutes, up to about 9 minutes, up to about 10 minutes, up to about 15 minutes, up to about 20 minutes, up to about 25 minutes, up to about 30 minutes, or up to about 35 minutes or more. All time periods within these ranges is included. In certain aspects longer residence times may be desired.
In aspects of the invention the methods are conducted under ambient light at room temperatures. It is understood however, that lighting and temperatures may be further adjusted.
In aspects, the effective current density range for use in the method for treating fertigation water for degradation of contaminants varies with contact times. In non-limiting aspects it may be about 0.76 to about 2.27 mA/cm2, or about 0.76 to about 9.09 mA/cm2, or about 0.76 to about 1.14 mA/cm2 inclusive of any subranges within these ranges as understood by one of skill in the art.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention is an in situ electrochemical method for the treatment of an aqueous solution comprising:
flowing the aqueous solution through an electrochemical cell (EFC) comprising dimensionally stable anodes for a time effective to decrease the amount of a pesticide contained in the aqueous solution.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention is a method to remove/degrade a pesticide in fertigation water comprising:
flowing fertigation water through an electrochemical cell (EFC) comprising dimensionally stable anodes under conditions that remove/degrade the pesticide present in the fertigation water. In aspects, the conditions comprise flow rate, pH and applied current.
In accordance with another aspect, is an in situ oxidant producing method for the treatment of fertigation water, comprising:
flowing fertigation water through an electrochemical cell (EFC) comprising BDD electrodes under conditions to continuously regenerate oxidative species in an effective amount to remove/degrade a pesticide present in said fertigation water.
In aspects, the conditions comprise flow rate, pH and applied current.
According to a further aspect of the invention is the use of an electrochemical cell comprising DSA electrodes or BDD electrodes for the treatment of an aqueous solution to remove/degrade a pesticide therein.
According to a further aspect of the invention is the use of an electrochemical cell comprising DSA electrodes or BDD electrodes for the removal/degradation of a pesticide contained in fertigation water. In aspects, the pesticide is glyphosate, paclobutrazol and/or aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA).
According to a further aspect of the invention is the use of an electrochemical cell comprising BDD electrodes for the treatment of fertigation water to remove/degrade paclobutrazol.
According to a further aspect of the invention is the use of an electrochemical cell comprising DSA electrodes for the treatment of fertigation water to remove/degrade glyphosate.
According to a further aspect of the invention is the use of an electrochemical cell comprising DSA electrodes or BDD electrodes for the treatment of fertigation water contaminated by Roundup™, Glyfos™, Bonzi™, Downsize™, Paczol™, Piccolo™ and Piccolo 10XC™.
In the methods of the invention, fertigation water is pumped into the EFC, where it contacts and flows through the electrically charged DSAs and exits the EFC for collection. Pesticide removal/degradation is achieved by the contact with the electrodes.
In further aspects, methods of the invention to remove/degrade pesticides are achieved through the use of an electrochemical flow cell (EFC) that is outfitted with BDD anodes. In the methods, fertigation water is pumped into the EFC, where it contacts and flows through the electrically charged BDDs and exits the EFC for collection. Pesticide removal/degradation is achieved by regenerative mediated electrolysis, whereby oxidants are generated in situ (a combination of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as O2, O3, H2O2 and OH) that degrade the pesticide.
Overall the electrochemical fertigation water treatment methods to remove/degrade pesticides, or other recalcitrant organic pollutants, that may be present in the fertigation water involve the capture and transfer of the fertigation water to an electrochemical treatment unit comprising one or more EFC. Further the fertigation water is pumped into and passes through the electrochemical flow cell. In this step, direct electrical current is applied and the rate of flow is adjusted to achieve a desired level of fertigation water treatment based on the concentration of the pesticides, or other recalcitrant organic pollutants, to be removed/degraded.
Hydraulic residence time within the electrochemical flow cell is in a range of at least about 15 seconds to about 30 minutes or more, depending on the concentration of the pesticides to be removed/degraded. The treated fertigation water effluent may optionally be passed through either a clarifier or filter for removal of any precipitated solid particles that may be present in the treated fertigation water. The treated fertigation water effluent may optionally be UV treated before or after any clarifier or filter treatment.
Broadly presented, systems of the invention include providing a flow-through EFC including a cathode and an anode, wherein the anode is selected from DSA or BDD. The systems further include a power source connected to the cathode and the anode, a pump for passing a fertigation water through the flow-through EFC, and withdrawing the treated fertigation water from the EFC. The fertigation water thus treated is used to irrigate crops in a CEA technology, the runoff collected, and recycled back into the flow-through EFC system.
In aspects is a method for the treatment of fertigation water to control levels of pesticides therein.
In aspects the electrochemically treated fertigation water also comprises stable chloride levels.
In aspects is electrochemically treated fertigation water comprising stable levels of oxidative species as to control levels of pesticides therein.
In aspects is electrochemically treated fertigation water comprises one or more of stable levels of oxidative species, stable levels of free chloride, safe chlorate species levels, negligible pesticide levels, safe levels of toxic pesticide breakdown by-products and any level for non-toxic products.
The methods and systems of the invention are flexible and scalable to desired system sizes. The removal/degradation of pesticide targets is achieved through the judicious selection of parameters (current density, flow rate/contact time, chloride concentration, electrode area (scaling factor)).
The methods and systems of the invention are versatile, technologically effective, and cost-effective for the in situ treatment of an aqueous solutions from a variety of sources using a flow-through EFC that utilizes DSA or BDD anodes under judiciously selected parameters of current, flow rate and pH. Treatment comprises one or more of: removal of contaminants, disinfection of pathogens, de-chlorination, and mineralization of organic components.
Treatment may further include a step of UV treatment to the treated effluent. Treatment can be a continuous process as for example in an irrigation system or further when the system of the invention is incorporated as part of a conventional water treatment system or sewage treatment system. Treated aqueous solutions have more desirable properties for their intended use. For example, as part of a water treatment system the flow-through EFC of the invention and methods used therein improve the potability of drinking water or water used to make various beverages.
According to an aspect of the invention is an irrigation system comprising: one or more electrically-driven electrochemical flow cell (EFC) fluidly connected to a source of fertigation water to be treated; and an irrigation water distribution system fluidly connected to the one or more electrically-driven EFC.
According to an aspect of the invention is a system for removing recalcitrant organic pollutants from fertigation water, the system including at least one electrochemical flow cell comprising:
a housing having an inlet for untreated fertigation water and an outlet for treated fertigation water that has been treated within the housing;
an array of spaced apart electrodes within the housing;
a source for applying direct current the electrodes to charge one portion of the array positively and another portion of the array negatively so as to create an electrical gradient between the portions of the array, the direct current being sufficient to oxidize and to neutralize small particle surface charges in an aqueous solution, and
container structure adjacent the housing, the container structure having an inlet chamber and an outlet chamber, the inlet chamber accumulating untreated water and delivering the untreated water to the inlet of the housing, an outlet of the housing being connected to the outlet chamber of the container and an outlet line being connected to the outlet chamber to drain away the treated water.
According to an aspect of the invention is a system for industrial process water treatment, the system including at least one electrochemical flow cell comprising:
a housing having an inlet for untreated industrial process water and an outlet for treated industrial process water that has been treated within the housing;
an array of spaced apart electrodes within the housing;
a source for applying direct current the electrodes to charge one portion of the array positively and another portion of the array negatively so as to create an electrical gradient between the portions of the array, the direct current being sufficient to oxidize and to neutralize small particle surface charges in the industrial process water, and
container structure adjacent the housing, the container structure having an inlet chamber and an outlet chamber, the inlet chamber accumulating untreated industrial process water and delivering the untreated industrial process water to the inlet of the housing, an outlet of the housing being connected to the outlet chamber of the container and an outlet line being connected to the outlet chamber to drain away the effluent treated industrial process water. In aspects, the treatment parameters of the system for treating industrial process water are selected dependent on end use such as consumption, manufacturing, or even disposal. Treatment of industrial process water may include for example one or more of degradation of contaminants, disinfecting pathogens, mineralizing organics. this treatment may also include an optional step of UV treatment.
Operationally, the in situ electrochemical aqueous solution treatment methods of the invention involve the capture and transfer of the aqueous solution to an electrochemical treatment unit comprising one or more EFC. Further the aqueous solution is pumped into and passes through the electrochemical flow cell. In this step, direct electrical current is applied and the rate of flow is adjusted to achieve a desired level of aqueous solution treatment based on the concentration of the pathogen to be inactivated or contaminants to be removed. Hydraulic residence time within the electrochemical flow cell is in a range of at least about 15 seconds to about 10 minutes or more. The treated aqueous solution effluent may optionally be passed through either a clarifier or filter for removal of any precipitated solid particles that may be present in the treated fertigation water and further optionally UV treated.
Broadly presented, systems of the invention include providing a flow-through EFC including a cathode and an anode, wherein the anode is selected from DSA or BDD. The systems further include a power source connected to the cathode and the anode, a pump for passing a an aqueous solution through the flow-through EFC for treatment, and withdrawing the treated water (treated effluent) from the EFC. The treated effluent can optionally be UV treated and used as desired. The systems are flexible and scalable to desired system sizes as well as can be adapted to be incorporated as part of other treatment systems for water, wastewater and/or sewage. Targets are achieved through the manipulation of parameters (current density, flow rate/contact time, chloride concentration, electrode area (scaling factor)).
For example if the aqueous solution is a fertigation water, the treated effluent is used to irrigate crops in CEA, the runoff collected, and continuously recycled back into the flow-through EFC system.
In aspects is a method for the treatment of fertigation water to control plant pathogens, degrade recalcitrant organic contaminants and/or mineralize organics.
In aspects is electrochemically treated fertigation water comprising stable chloride levels and effective levels of free chlorine as a disinfectant to control plant pathogens and stable macronutrient levels.
The methods and systems of the invention are versatile, technologically effective, and cost-effective for the in situ electrochemical treatment of fertigation water using a flow-through EFC that utilizes DSA or BDD anodes.
According to an aspect of the invention is an irrigation system comprising: one or more electrically-driven electrochemical flow cell (EFC) fluidly connected to a source of fertigation water to be treated; and an irrigation water distribution system fluidly connected to the one or more electrically-driven EFC.
According to an aspect of the invention is a system for removing contaminants from fertigation water, the system including at least one electrochemical flow cell comprising:
a housing having an inlet for untreated fertigation water and an outlet for treated fertigation water that has been treated within the housing;
an array of spaced apart electrodes within the housing;
a source for applying direct current the electrodes to charge one portion of the array positively and another portion of the array negatively so as to create an electrical gradient between the portions of the array, the direct current being sufficient to oxidize and to neutralize small particle surface charges in an aqueous solution, and
container structure adjacent the housing, the container structure having an inlet chamber and an outlet chamber, the inlet chamber accumulating untreated water and delivering the untreated water to the inlet of the housing, an outlet of the housing being connected to the outlet chamber of the container and an outlet line being connected to the outlet chamber to drain away the treated water.
Aspects of the invention comprise:
1. An in situ electrochemical method for the treatment of an aqueous solution, comprising:
flowing the aqueous solution through an electrochemical cell comprising at least one anode and at least one complementary cathode while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH,
wherein said flowing aqueous solution contacts the anode and cathode causing one or more of: degradation of a recalcitrant organic contaminant in said aqueous solution, mineralization and solubilization of an organic present in said aqueous solution, forming a disinfection agent against a pathogen, and maintaining nutrient levels in said aqueous solution; and
collecting treated effluent.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one anode is a dimensionally stable anode or a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the dimensionally stable anode is ruthenium dioxide.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the at least one anode is a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the BDD continuously produces reactive oxygen species selected from O2, O3, H2O2 and OH.
6. The method of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said aqueous solution is a nutrient solution, a municipal water source, an industrial water source.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein said aqueous solution is a nutrient solution for use in agriculture.
7a. The method of claim 7, wherein the nutrient solution does not contain ammonium ions.
7b. The method of claim 7, wherein the nutrient solution is nitrate based.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said effluent nutrient solution comprises free chlorine concentrations remain below phytotoxic thresholds of about 2.5 mg/L.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein chloride concentrations remain stable throughout the treatment of the nutrient solution.
10. The method of any one of claims 6 to 9, wherein the disinfection agent is not accumulated in said effluent treated nutrient solution to toxic levels for a crop.
11. The method of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein macronutrient content of the aqueous solution remains substantially unaltered during treatment.
12. The method of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said aqueous solution is a municipal water source or an industrial water source.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said aqueous solution is a waste water of the municipal water source or the industrial water source.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein said treatment degrades a recalcitrant organic contaminant in said waste water such that effluent treated waste water is contaminant free.
15. The method of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said aqueous solution is an organic fertilizer solution.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein said treatment mineralizes and solubilizes any organic present in said organic fertilizer solution increasing nutrient levels in the treated effluent.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein said treated effluent is suitable for hydroponic systems.
18. The method of any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein the current density is at least about 0.76 mA/cm2 to about 9.09 mA/cm2.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the current density is about 1.14 mA/cm2, about 2.27 mA/cm2, about 3.41 mA/cm2, about 4.55 mA/cm2, about 6.82 mA/cm2 or about 9.09 mA/cm2.
20. The method of any one of claims 1 to 19, wherein the pH of the aqueous solution during treatment is at least about 5.4, about 5.4 to about 8.5, about 5.5 to 6.5, or favourable for chloride and nitrogen species in said solution.
21. The method of any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein the flow rate is selected to provide a residence time of treatment of up to about 10 minutes, of up to about 20 minutes, of up to about 30 minutes or of up to about 40 minutes.
22. The method of any one of claims 1 to 21, wherein the method is conducted at about room temperature.
23. The method of any one of claims 1 to 22, wherein the method is conducted under ambient light.
24. The method of any one of claims 1 to 23, wherein the pathogen is a chloride sensitive pathogen.
24a. The method of any one of claims 1 to 23, optionally comprising UV treatment of the treated effluent.
25. A regenerative in situ oxidant generating method for the treatment of fertigation water, comprising:
flowing fertigation water containing organic species through an electrochemical cell to effect regenerative mediate electrolysis, the electrochemical cell comprising at least one anode and at least one complementary cathode while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH,
wherein said flowing of said fertigation water continuously regenerates a disinfection agent in an effective amount to control an oxidant-susceptible pathogen in said fertigation water; and
collecting effluent treated fertigation water, wherein the disinfection agent is not accumulated in said effluent treated fertigation water to toxic levels for a crop.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the at least one anode is a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein the BDD continuously produces reactive oxygen species selected from O2, O3, H2O2 and OH.
28. The method of any one of claims 25 to 27, wherein any chlorate species formed in said fertigation water is below acceptable levels of below about 2 mg/L in said effluent treated fertigation water.
29. The method of any one of claims 25 to 28, wherein macronutrient content of the fertigation water remains substantially unaltered.
30. The method of any one of claims 25 to 29, wherein the current density is at least about 0.76 mA/cm2 to about 9.09 mA/cm2.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein the current density is about 1.14 mA/cm2, about 2.27 mA/cm2, about 3.41 mA/cm2, about 4.55 mA/cm2, about 6.82 mA/cm2 or about 9.09 mA/cm2.
32. The method of any one of claims 25 to 31, wherein the pH of the fertigation water during treatment is at least about 5.4, about 5.4 to about 8.5 or about 5.5 to 6.5.
33. The method of any one of claims 25 to 32, wherein the pH is selected to be favourable for chloride and nitrogen species in said fertigation water.
34. The method of any one of claims 25 to 33, wherein the flow rate is selected to provide a residence time during treatment of up to about 10 minutes, up to about 20 minutes or up to about 30 minutes.
35. The method of any one of claims 25 to 34, wherein the method is conducted at about room temperature.
36. The method of any one of claims 25 to 35, wherein the method is conducted under ambient light.
37. The method of any one of claims 25 to 36, wherein the oxidant-susceptible pathogen is selected from fungi, bacteria, viruses, oocymetes, and mycoplasmas.
38. The method of claim 37, wherein the oxidant-susceptible pathogen is a fungi from the genus Rhizoctonia or Fusarium.
39. The method of claim 38, wherein the oxidant-susceptible pathogen is Fusarium oxysporum or Rhizoctonia solani.
40. The method of any one of claims 25 to 39, wherein chloride is regenerated without a build-up of free chlorine while maintaining acceptable low chloride effluent levels in the treated fertigation water.
41. The method of any one of claims 25 to 40, wherein amounts of ammonium, nitrate and sulphate ions are increased in said treated fertigation water.
42. A controlled environment agricultural system employing the method of any one of claims 25 to 41.
43. A method for conserving and recycling nutrient rich water in controlled environment agriculture, the method comprising using and recycling treated fertigation water made by the method of any one of claims 25 to 42.
44. A method to increase nutrient availability within organic fertigation water for crop growth while simultaneously inactivating chloride-susceptible and/or oxidant-susceptible crop pathogens, the method comprising in situ electrochemical mineralization of the organic fertigation water to degrade nitrogen containing organic matter to release ammonia ions and nitrate ions for crop growth, and regenerative mediated electrolysis to continuously regenerate reactive oxygen species in an effective amount to control an oxidant-susceptible pathogen in said fertigation water.
45. An in situ oxidant producing method for the treatment of fertigation water, comprising:
flowing fertigation water containing organic matter through an electrochemical cell to effect regenerative mediate electrolysis, the electrochemical cell comprising a boron doped diamond (BDD) anode and at least one complementary stainless steel cathode while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH,
continuously regenerating oxidative species in an effective amount to control a pathogen in said fertigation water; and optionally
biodegrading nitrogen containing matter in said fertigation water to release ammonium ions and nitrate ions.
46. An in situ electrochemical method for making sustainable nutrient solutions for agricultural use, the method comprising:
flowing waste water containing organic matter through an electrochemical cell to effect regenerative mediate electrolysis, the electrochemical cell comprising a boron doped diamond (BDD) anode and at least one complementary stainless steel cathode while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH,
continuously regenerating oxidative species in an effective amount to degrade the organic matter in said waste water releasing soluble ion nutrients; and
collecting the treated effluent.
47. Use of the sustainable nutrient solution of claim 46 in an agriculture irrigation system.
48. The use of claim 47, wherein the agricultural irrigation system is a hydroponic system.
49. An irrigation system for a crop comprising:
one or more electrically-driven electrochemical flow cells (EFC) comprising at least one anode and at least one complementary cathode, each of the EFC fluidly connected to a source of recycling fertigation water being treated under set pH, current density and flow rate; and an irrigation water distribution system fluidly connected to the one or more electrically-driven EFC.
50. The system of claim 49, wherein the at least one anode is a dimensionally stable anode or a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
51. The system of claim 50, wherein the dimensionally stable anode is ruthenium dioxide.
52. The system of claim 50, wherein the at least one anode is a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
53. The system of claim 52, wherein the BDD continuously produces reactive oxygen species selected from O2, O3, H2O2 and OH.
54. The system of any one of claims 49 to 53, wherein said fertigation water is a nutrient solution derived from a municipal water source or an industrial water source.
55. The system of any one of claims 49 to 54, wherein macronutrient content of the fertigation water remains substantially unaltered during treatment and irrigation.
56. The system of any one of claims 49 to 55, wherein said treatment degrades a recalcitrant organic contaminant in said fertigation water.
57. The system of any one of claims 49 to 56, wherein said fertigation water is an organic nutrient solution.
58. The system of claim 57, wherein said treatment mineralizes and solubilizes organic present in said organic nutrient solution increasing nutrient levels in the treated solution.
59. The system of claim 58, wherein said irrigation system is a hydroponic system.
60. The system of any one of claims 49 to 59, wherein the current density is at least about 0.76 mA/cm2 to about 9.09 mA/cm2.
61. The system of claim 60, wherein the current density is about 1.14 mA/cm2, about 2.27 mA/cm2, about 3.41 mA/cm2, about 4.55 mA/cm2, about 6.82 mA/cm2 or about 9.09 mA/cm2.
62. The system of any one of claims 49 to 61, wherein the pH of the aqueous solution during treatment is at least about 5.4, about 5.4 to about 8.5, about 5.5 to 6.5, or favourable for chloride and nitrogen species in said solution.
63. The system of any one of claims 49 to 62, wherein the flow rate is selected to provide a residence time of treatment of up to about 10 minutes.
64. The system of any one of claims 49 to 63, wherein treatment is conducted at about room temperature.
65. The system of any one of claims 49 to 64, wherein the treatment is conducted under ambient light.
66. Electrochemically treated fertigation water comprising stable levels of oxidative species as a disinfectant to control plant pathogens, stable nutrient levels, mineralized organics and/or safe chlorate species levels.
67. An electrochemical method for the treatment of a nutrient aqueous solution, comprising:
flowing nutrient aqueous solution through an electrochemical cell comprising at least one anode and at least one complementary cathode while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH,
wherein said flowing of said nutrient aqueous solution contacting the anode and cathode degrades a pesticide in said nutrient aqueous solution; and
collecting treated effluent.
68. The method of claim 67, wherein the at least one anode is a dimensionally stable anode.
69. The method of claim 68, wherein the dimensionally stable anode is ruthenium dioxide.
70. The method of claim 68 or 69, wherein free chlorine concentrations remain below phytotoxic thresholds of about 2.5 mg/L in said treated effluent.
71. The method of claim 70, wherein chloride concentrations remain stable throughout the treatment of the nutrient aqueous solution.
72. The method of any one of claims 67 to 71, wherein the current density is at least about 0.76 mA/cm2 to about 9.09 mA/cm2.
73. The method of claim 72, wherein the current density is about 1.14 mA/cm2, about 2.27 mA/cm2, about 3.41 mA/cm2, about 4.55 mA/cm2, about 6.82 mA/cm2 or about 9.09 mA/cm2.
74. The method of any one of claims 67 to 73, wherein the pH of the nutrient aqueous solution during treatment is between about 5.4 to about 8.5.
75. The method of claim 74, wherein the pH is about 5.5 to 6.5.
76. The method of any one of claims 67 to 75, wherein the flow rate is selected to provide a treatment residence time of up to about 30 minutes.
77. The method of any one of claims 67 to 76, wherein the method is conducted at about room temperature.
78. The method of any one of claims 67 to 77, wherein the method is conducted under ambient light.
79. The method of any one of claims 67 to 78, wherein the pesticide is an organophosphate pesticide or a carbamate pesticide.
80. The method of claim 79, wherein the pesticide is glyphosate.
81. The method of claim 79, wherein the pesticide is paclobutrazol.
82. The method of claim 79, wherein the pesticide is a breakdown product of the pesticide.
83. The method of claim 82, wherein the breakdown product is aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA).
84. The method of any one of claims 67 to 83, wherein the nutrient aqueous solution is contaminated with one or more of Roundup™, Glyfos™, Bonzi™, Downsize™, Paczol™, Piccolo™ and Piccolo 10XC™
85. The method of any one of claims 67 to 84, wherein loss of total nitrogen levels in said nutrient aqueous solution is limited during treatment.
86. The method of any one of claims 67 to 84, wherein said nutrient aqueous solution is derived from electrochemically treated organic waste solution.
87. A controlled environment agricultural system employing the method of any one of claims 67 to 86.
88. A regenerative in situ oxidant generating method for the treatment of fertigation water, comprising:
flowing fertigation water containing organic species through an electrochemical cell to effect regenerative mediate electrolysis, the electrochemical cell comprising at least one anode and at least one complementary cathode while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH,
wherein said flowing of said fertigation water continuously regenerates an oxidative species in an effective amount to degrade a pesticide in said fertigation water; and
collecting treated effluent.
89. The method of claim 88, wherein the at least one anode is a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
90. The method of claim 88 or 89, wherein the BDD continuously produces reactive oxygen species selected from O2, O3, H2O2 and OH.
91. The method of any one of claims 67 to 90, wherein any chlorate species formed in said nutrient aqueous solution is below acceptable levels of below about 2 mg/L in said treated effluent.
92. The method of any one of claims 67 to 91, wherein the current density is at least about 0.76 mA/cm2 to about 9.09 mA/cm2.
93. The method of claim 92, wherein the current density is about 1.14 mA/cm2, about 2.27 mA/cm2, about 3.41 mA/cm2, about 4.55 mA/cm2, about 6.82 mA/cm2 or about 9.09 mA/cm2.
94. The method of any one of claims 67 to 93, wherein the pH of the nutrient aqueous solution during treatment is at least about 5.4 to about 8.5 or about 5.5 to about 6.5.
95. The method of any one of claims 67 to 94, wherein the flow rate is selected to provide a treatment residence time of up to about 30 minutes, up to about 20 minutes or up to about 10 minutes.
96. The method of any one of claims 67 to 95, wherein the method is conducted at about room temperature.
97. The method of any one of claims 67 to 96, wherein the method is conducted under ambient light.
98. The method of any one of claims 67 to 97, wherein the pesticide is an organophosphate pesticide or a carbamate pesticide.
99. The method of claim 98, wherein the pesticide is glyphosate.
100. The method of claim 98, wherein the pesticide is paclobutrazol.
101. The method of claim 98, wherein the pesticide is a breakdown product of the pesticide.
102. The method of claim 101, wherein the breakdown product is aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA).
103. The method of any one of claims 67 to 98, wherein the fertigation water is contaminated with one or more of Roundup™, Glyfos™, Bonzi™, Downsize™, Paczol™, Piccolo™ and Piccolo 10XC™
104. A controlled environment agricultural system employing the method of any one of claims 67 to 103.
105. A method for conserving and recycling nutrient aqueous solution in controlled environment agriculture, the method comprising using and re-using treated nutrient aqueous solution made by the method of any one of claims 67 to 103.
106. A method for the treatment of an organic waste material solution to make a stable organic nutrient solution for use in agriculture, comprising:
flowing the organic waste material solution through an electrochemical cell comprising a boron doped diamond (BDD) anode and at least one complementary stainless steel cathode while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH, for a time sufficient to mineralize the organic waste material and solubilize nutrients; and
collecting treated effluent.
107. The method of claim 106, wherein the organic waste material solution comprises compost, guano, sewage, manure, bone meal, soya meal, kelp extract, plant leaves, plant roots, wood debris and combinations thereof.
108. An in situ oxidant producing method for the treatment of fertigation water, comprising:
flowing fertigation water through an electrochemical cell comprising a boron doped diamond (BDD) anode and at least one complementary stainless steel cathode for a time effective to degrade placlobutrazol while simultaneously adjusting one or more of current density, flow rate and pH; and
collecting effluent treated fertigation water.
109. Use of the fertigation water of claim 108 to provide pesticide crop security in controlled environment agriculture systems.
110. An in situ electrochemically treated aqueous solution that is pesticide crop secure.
111. An in situ electrochemical industrial process water treatment system comprising one or more electrically-driven electrochemical flow cells (EFC) comprising at least one anode and at least one complementary cathode, each of the EFC fluidly connected to a source of recycling industrial process water being treated under set pH, current density and flow rate; and a collection means fluidly connected to the one or more electrically-driven EFC for collecting treated effluent industrial process water.
112. The system of claim 111, wherein the at least one anode is a dimensionally stable anode or a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
113. The system of claim 112, wherein the dimensionally stable anode is ruthenium dioxide.
114. The system of claim 112, wherein the at least one anode is a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode.
115. The system of claim 114, wherein the BDD continuously produces reactive oxygen species selected from O2, O3, H2O2 and OH.
116. The system of any one of claims 111 to 115, wherein treatment comprises degradation of contaminants, disinfection of a pathogen and/or mineralization of an organic into solution.
The above and other aspects, advantages, and features of this disclosure will become more apparent by describing in further detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. In this regard, the present exemplary embodiments may have different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the descriptions set forth herein. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments are merely described below, by referring to the figures, to explain aspects of the present description.
As used herein, the terms “invention” or “present invention” are non-limiting terms and not intended to refer to any single aspect of the particular invention but encompass all possible aspects as described in the specification and the claims.
All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. The publications and applications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and are not intended to be limiting.
In the case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of skill in the art to which the subject matter herein belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and the present disclosure, and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
As used herein, the following definitions are supplied in order to facilitate the understanding of the present invention.
As used herein, the articles “a” and “an” preceding an element or component are intended to be non-restrictive regarding the number of instances (i.e. occurrences) of the element or component. Therefore, “a” or “an” should be read to include one or at least one, and the singular word form of the element or component also includes the plural unless the number is obviously meant to be singular.
It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” or “includes”, “including” and/or “having” and their inflections and conjugates denote when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, regions, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, regions, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
It will be understood that any component defined herein as being included may be explicitly excluded from the claimed invention by way of proviso or negative limitation.
As used herein, the term “about” refers to variation in the numerical quantity. In one aspect, the term “about” means within 10% of the reported numerical value. In another aspect, the term “about” means within 5% of the reported numerical value. Yet, in another aspect, the term “about” means within 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1% of the reported numerical value.
Should a range of values be recited, it is merely for convenience or brevity and includes all the possible sub-ranges as well as individual numerical values within and about the boundary of that range. Any numeric value, unless otherwise specified, includes also practical close values and integral values do not exclude fractional values. Sub-range values and practically close values should be considered as specifically disclosed values.
As used herein the term ‘may’ denotes an option or an effect which is either or not included and/or used and/or implemented and/or occurs, yet the option constitutes at least a part of some embodiments of the invention or consequence thereof, without limiting the scope of the invention.
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, e.g., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified unless clearly indicated to the contrary.
As used herein, expressions such as “at least one of,” when preceding a list of elements, modify the entire list of elements and do not modify the individual elements of the list.
“About,” “approximately,” or “substantially” as used herein is inclusive of the stated value and means within an acceptable range of deviation for the particular value as determined by one of ordinary skill in the art, considering the measurement in question and the error associated with measurement of the particular quantity (i.e., the limitations of the measurement system). For example, “about,” “approximately,” or “substantially” can mean within one or more standard deviations, or within +30%, 20%, 10%, 5% of the stated value.
“Controlled-environment agriculture” (CEA), as used herein, includes technologies where all environmental factors can be controlled. Factors may include artificial control of light, environmental control (e.g. humidity, temperature, gases) and fertigation. CEA may include for example greenhouse, hydroponics, aquaculture, and aquaponics. CEA may also incorporate aspects of urban agriculture for plant growth such as raised beds, vertical gardening, container gardening and “growth chamber” production.
“Fertigation”, as used herein, is combining fertilizer and irrigation, a common industry term used to denote the delivery of fertilizer via the irrigation solution (i.e.) irrigation water. Such water is referred to as fertigation water or fertigation solution (the terms are used synonymously herein). Fertigation water is essentially nutrient feed water as it contains the essential elements required for healthy plant growth. It consists of various proportions of fertilizers dissolved in water or a blend of fertilizer solutions to provide the nutrient complement required for healthy plant growth.
Captured fertigation water is leached nutrient feed water, that is, the fertigation water that has been captured after passing though the growing substrate. It may or may not be recycled. It can also be referred to as leachate or leach.
“Fertilizer water/solution” as used herein is a stock solution consisting of a single fertilizer, or several compatible fertilizers, dissolved in water (aqueous solution) containing the essential nutrients for plant growth. Fertilizers may be inorganic (chemical, wholly or partially synthetic origin and exclude carbon-containing materials) or organic (derived from the remains or byproducts of natural organisms such as animal excreta (manure), human excreta, and vegetable matter (e.g. compost and crop residues). Naturally occurring organic fertilizers include animal wastes from meat processing, peat, manure, slurry, and guano. Inorganic fertilizers may be classified according to whether they provide a single nutrient (e.g., K, P, or N), in which case they are classified as “straight fertilizers.” “Multinutrient fertilizers” (or “complex fertilizers”) provide two or more nutrients, for example N and P. Nitrogen-based straight fertilizers include ammonia and its solutions, ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and urea. The main straight phosphate fertilizers are the superphosphates. The main potassium-based straight fertilizer is Muriate of Potash (MOP).
“Hydroponic” as used herein is a method of growing plants without soil but instead use a mineral nutrient solution in a water solvent. Other non-soil substrates can be used to help with physical support of plant/roots during growth.
“Organic hydroponics” as used herein is a hydroponic culture system utilizing organic fertilizer. “Bioponics” as used herein is the soilless system components such as the media beds, troughs, structural supports such as rafts and so forth.
“Biomass” as used herein is a total mass of a plant (living matter) in a given area or volume. Biomass may also refer to a renewable resource of waste such as crop waste, wood, manure, types of garbage and the like.
Crop, as used herein, is a cultivated plant grown on a large scale commercially. The crop is understood not to be limited as understood by one of skill in the art. A crop may be edible or ornamental. “Plant” may be used interchangeably for “crop” herein. Within the scope of present invention, crops/plants to be protected typically comprise perennial and annual crops, such as but not limited in any manner to berry plants for example blackberries, blueberries, cranberries, raspberries and strawberries; cereals for example barley, maize (corn), millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum triticale and wheat; fibre plants for example cotton, flax, hemp, jute and sisal; field crops for example sugar and fodder beet, coffee, hops, mustard, oilseed rape (canola), poppy, sugar cane, sunflower, tea and tobacco; fruit trees for example apple, apricot, avocado, banana, cherry, citrus, nectarine, peach, pear and plum; grasses for example Bermuda grass, bluegrass, bentgrass, centipede grass, fescue, ryegrass, St. Augustine grass and Zoysia grass; herbs such as basil, borage, chives, coriander, lavender, lovage, mint, oregano, parsley, rosemary, sage and thyme; legumes for example beans, lentils, peas and soya beans; nuts for example almond, cashew, ground nut, hazelnut, peanut, pecan, pistachio and walnut; palms for example oil palm; ornamentals for example flowers (floriculture), shrubs and trees; other trees, for example cacao, coconut, olive and rubber; vegetables for example asparagus, aubergine, broccoli, cabbage, carrot, cucumber, garlic, lettuce, marrow, melon, okra, onion, pepper, potato, pumpkin, rhubarb, spinach and tomato; vines for example grapes; and Cannabis for example, Cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica and Cannabis ruderalis.
The useful plants and/or target crops in accordance with the invention include conventional as well as genetically enhanced or engineered varieties.
Crop security, as used herein, is being free from danger or threat from pathogens, phytotoxic chemical contaminants, and/or nutrient imbalances.
The term “remove” as used herein is used meant to substantially eliminate to an undetectable level or a level safe for a living organism and/or crop.
The term “degrade” as used herein means to transform into a benign substance that is environmentally compatible.
The term “agrichemical” as used herein is a chemical used in agriculture, such as a pesticide or a fertilizer.
As used herein the term “pesticide” is a composite term that includes all chemicals that are used to kill or control pests. Pesticides are used to protect crops against insects, weeds, fungi, and other pests and play a significant role in food production by protecting or increasing yields, and the number of times per year a crop can be grown on the same land. In agriculture pesticides include herbicides (weeds), insecticides (insects), fungicides (fungi), nematocides (nematodes), and rodenticides (vertebrate poisons).
Pesticides include organophosphate pesticides and carbamate pesticides such as glyphosate (IUPAC name: N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) and AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid, a toxic break down product of glyphosate) and paclobutrazol.
The acronym EFC, as used herein, is an electrochemical flow cell.
Disinfect, disinfecting, inactivate, are each used synonymously herein, as meaning to destroy and/or inhibit growth of a pathogen, to render a pathogen inert and not harmful to crops/plants. A “susceptible” pathogen is likely or liable to be influenced or harmed by the regenerated disinfectant as described herein.
The term “effective amount” means the quantity of disinfectant that is capable of producing an effect on the growth of pathogen. Controlling or modifying effects include all deviation from natural development, such as killing, retardation and the like, and prevention includes barrier or other defensive formation in or on a plant to prevent infection.
The acronym DSA, as used herein, is a dimensionally stable anode. Dimensionally stable anodes are basically a titanium skeleton covered with electrocatalytically active mixtures of oxides. These anodes consist of mainly ruthenium oxide deposited on titanium along with other metallic oxides like platinum, iridium, palladium, rodium and titanium. Dimensionally stable anodes preserve their shape and voltage characteristics even under severe conditions of anodic attack. They exhibit dimensional stability, longer life and function effectively at higher current densities.
Regenerative mediated electrolysis, as used herein, is a process in which chloride ions are transformed to free chlorine forms (e.g., hypochlorous acid) which neutralizes pathogens and in this process releases chloride ions back to the solution. The chloride ions migrate back to the anode through electrostatic migration where once again they can be transformed to free chlorine forms leading to further pathogen inactivation.
A general non-limiting overview of the invention and practising the invention is presented below. The overview outlines exemplary practice of embodiments/aspects of the invention, providing a constructive basis for variant and/or alternative and/or divergent aspects/embodiments, some of which are subsequently described.
In situ electrochemical methods and systems are herein developed for the treatment of aqueous solutions for use in a variety of agricultural, municipal and industrial applications. In CEA operations treatment of recycling fertigation water is desired in order to decrease pathogens, provide stabile nutrients to the growing plants, degrade contaminants such as pesticides; degrade recalcitrant organic contaminants; and/or degrade organic fertilizers to provide nutrient ions for plant growth. Solutions of organic waste can be treated to degrade and solubilize plant nutrients, and thus be transformed into a source of organic fertigation water for use in CEA such as in hydroponics. Municipal and industrial used water (waste water) can be subjected to the in situ electrochemical methods of the invention to degrade organic and non-organic contaminants and destroy pathogens. The in situ electrochemical treatment systems of the invention can also be incorporated within a wastewater treatment plant.
In one non-limiting embodiment, in situ electrochemical methods, and systems incorporating the methods, are herein developed for the treatment of fertigation water that is used primarily in CEA operations where recycling of fertigation water is desired.
This demonstrates many benefits and substantiates the process which can be implemented in Controlled Environment Agriculture. The electrochemical process for in situ treatment of a recirculating nutrient can be used successfully for commercial floriculture production with plants propagated in soil. The technology is effective for pathogen removal without posing phytotoxic effects to crops. The technology is also demonstrated that it can be utilized in conventional hydroponic systems. With fertilizers containing NH4+, the system can be used successfully with lower current densities, which do not release chloramines at concentrations higher than the phytotoxic threshold (0.2 mg/L NH4Cl). If higher current densities are needed for operations, tertiary treatment methods such as UV light may be used to produce crops without negative impacts on growth. Furthermore, NO3 based fertilizers without the presence of NH4+ presents the best option for growers and provides crop yields in which are equivalent or enhanced in comparison to conventional hydroponic methods without water treatment.
The electrochemical process with BDD electrodes can be successfully used for mineralizing organic materials and solubilize nutrients in which can be used for hydroponics or conventional irrigation systems. This allows for a variety of organic waste materials to be used in hydroponic and other irrigation systems decreasing reliance on synthetic fertilizers. The electrochemical processes are also effective to remove/degrade undesired agrichemicals such as pesticides from the fertigation water.
An electrochemical flow cell (EFC) system is employed with each cell comprising a plurality of dimensionally stable anodes (DSA) and complementary cathodes (collectively an electrode array) supported within a casing/housing that may be any suitable material such as but not limited to acrylic. In one embodiment, the DSA may be RuO2 and the complementary cathode stainless steel. The EFC may comprise a set of six RuO2 DSA and a set of five complementary stainless steel cathodes spaced apart therefrom. In one embodiment, each cathode is spaced about 2 mm apart from each of its complementary anode. Generally, the closer the electrodes, the better the electron transfer is, and the less conductivity the influent fertigation water needs to have. However, the electrodes may be further apart and still be effective. The electrodes should not be in direct contact with each other.
Fertigation water to be treated is pumped via a variable speed peristaltic pump into the bottom entry port of the EFC housing and upwards through the electrodes, exiting the cell at an outflow port at the top of the housing. A power supply is connected to both anode and cathode of the flow cell. Multimeters are provided with direct connection to the anode and cathode of the cell for measuring the applied voltage. It is understood by one of skill in the art, that the electrochemical flow cell (EFC) system employed may be scaled to a desired size and volume of fertigation water, used in series, and further connected to an irrigation system to deliver the treated fertigation water to the crop and collect run off for pooling and recirculation. It is also understood that the scaled system may further comprise a variety of sensors and so forth for operation. A pre-filter may be added in the influent fertigation water stream or a post-filter may be added in the effluent treated fertigation stream to catch particles. The EFC may have any practically useful shape that may be utilized for fertigation water purification purposes. The shape of the EFC cell is not limited.
The EFC according to any embodiment, may further include an oxidation-reduction potential sensor, a pH sensor, a chlorine sensor, a conductivity sensor, a flow rate sensor, a temperature sensor, or a combination thereof.
In another embodiment, EFC may include two or more sequentially connected individual flow-through cells. The treated fertigation water may be delivered to the next flow-through cell, where a purification process is repeated.
In an embodiment, the electrodes used are BDD. In this aspect, advantageously the fertigation water is nutrient enhanced during treatment thereof by releasing ammonium into solution that is converted to nitrates thus being bioavailable to the crop(s) irrigated with the treated fertigation solution. Thus the recycling of fertigation water within the system in accordance with the methods described herein functions to enrich the treated fertigation water (with ammonium, nitrate, sulphate and calcium) and encourage crop growth. In this embodiment using BDD as the anodes, chloride may further be added to enhance inactivation of pathogens as is understood by one of skill in the art.
Electrochemical methods, and systems incorporating the methods, are now developed for the treatment of fertigation water that is used primarily in CEA operations where recycling of fertigation water is desired. The methods are effective to remove/degrade undesired agrichemicals such as pesticides from the fertigation water. It is desired to remove harmful pesticides such as for example glyphosate and paclobutrazol from the fertigation water in order not to be harmful to the crop to which the fertigation water is used. Further, pesticides can be absorbed by plants through the leaves and roots and can translocate to other parts of the plant. Crops irrigated with pesticide contaminated fertigation water are undesirable for human health.
In an embodiment, electrochemical treatment of fertigation water, as used in controlled environment agriculture, is used to remove/degrade pesticides to safe/safer levels for both the irrigated crop as well as for humans when the crop is consumed. The method and system are useful in recirculating irrigation systems employing fertigation water.
It is surprisingly demonstrated that electrochemical treatment of irrigation water, fertigation water, using either or both DSA and BDD effectively removes/degrades glyphosate and paclobutrazol therein. The DSA electrodes were demonstrated to degrade glyphosate more effectively than paclobutrazol. BDD electrodes were demonstrated to degrade paclobutrazol more effectively than glyphosate. Both DSA and BDD can however, be used effectively to degrade both glyphosate and paclobutrazol. Both of these electrochemical systems may incorporate chlorination monitored with respect to plant growth. The water treatment methods (DSA and BDD) were demonstrated effective at removing glyphosate from solution to levels that would remediate plant health. BDD electrodes had shown to also increase plant growth following treatment with glyphosate in comparison to the control sample. All of the water treatment methods were also shown to remove paclobutrazol in solution but at lower efficiency to that of glyphosate. Using BDD electrodes with longer contact times increased the efficiency of paclobutrazol removal thus improving water quality and plant growth.
The electrochemical methods used herein demonstrated the ability to remove pesticides such that they could be used in crop production systems using fertigation water.
An electrochemical flow cell (EFC) system is employed with each cell comprising a plurality of dimensionally stable anodes (DSA) and complementary cathodes (collectively an electrode array) supported within a casing/housing that may be any suitable material such as but not limited to acrylic. In one embodiment, the DSA may be RuO2 and the complementary cathode stainless steel. The EFC may comprise a set of six RuO2 DSA and a set of five complementary stainless steel cathodes spaced apart therefrom. In one embodiment, each cathode is spaced about 2 mm apart from each of its complementary anode. Generally, the closer the electrodes, the better the electron transfer is, and the less conductivity the influent fertigation water needs to have. However, the electrodes may be further apart and still be effective. The electrodes should not be in direct contact with each other.
Fertigation water to be treated is pumped via a variable speed peristaltic pump into the bottom entry port of the EFC housing and upwards through the electrodes, exiting the cell at an outflow port at the top of the housing. A power supply is connected to both anode and cathode of the flow cell. Multimeters are provided with direct connection to the anode and cathode of the cell for measuring the applied voltage. It is understood by one of skill in the art, that the electrochemical flow cell (EFC) system employed may be scaled to a desired size and volume of fertigation water, used in series, and further connected to an irrigation system to deliver the treated fertigation water to the crop and collect run off for pooling and recirculation. It is also understood that the scaled system may further comprise a variety of sensors and so forth for operation. A pre-filter may be added in the influent fertigation water stream or a post-filter may be added in the effluent treated fertigation stream to catch particles. The EFC may have any practically useful shape that may be utilized for fertigation water purification purposes. The shape of the EFC cell is not limited.
The EFC according to any embodiment, may further include an oxidation-reduction potential sensor, a pH sensor, a chlorine sensor, a conductivity sensor, a flow rate sensor, a temperature sensor, or a combination thereof.
In another embodiment, EFC may include two or more sequentially connected individual flow-through cells. The treated fertigation water may be delivered to the next flow-through cell, where the purification process is repeated.
Using this electrochemical cell system, the removal/degradation of a pesticide (for example, glyphosate and/or paclobutrazol) is achieved through the manipulation, in isolation or in combination, of the applied current, contact time.
In a further embodiment, the electrodes used are BDD to continuously produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) to remove/degrade a pesticide (for example, glyphosate and/or paclobutrazol). In this aspect, advantageously the fertigation water is nutrient enhanced during treatment thereof by releasing ammonium into solution that is converted to nitrates thus being bioavailable to the crop(s) irrigated with the treated fertigation solution. Thus the recycling of fertigation water within the system in accordance with the methods described herein functions to enrich the treated fertigation water (with ammonium, nitrate, sulphate and calcium) and encourage crop growth.
The methods and systems described herein are suitable for use for any fertigation water that comprises either inorganic or organic fertilizer and even mixtures thereof. In aspects, organic fertilizer water is employed with an EFC incorporating BDD.
The methods and systems may be employed in any fertigation irrigation system for any type of CEA employing recycling of their fertigation water.
The methods and systems described herein are suitable for the treatment of any fertigation water used for any desired crop, edible or ornamental. In aspects, the methods and systems are beneficial for growing cannabis such as for example in greenhouses and further hydroponically utilizing treated fertigation water of the invention and recycled treated fertigation water.
The methods and systems described herein are suitable for use for any fertigation water that comprises either inorganic or organic fertilizer and even mixtures thereof. In aspects, organic fertilizer water is employed with an EFC incorporating BDD.
The methods and systems may be employed in any fertigation irrigation system for any type of CEA employing recycling of their fertigation water.
The methods and systems described herein are suitable for use for any desired crop, edible or ornamental. In aspects, the methods and systems are beneficial for growing cannabis such as for example in greenhouses and further hydroponically utilizing treated fertigation water of the invention and recycled treated fertigation water.
To summarize, in situ electrochemical systems and methods are now developed for the treatment of aqueous solutions for a variety of applications. Aqueous solutions, such as fertigation water, can be continuously treated in agricultural irrigation systems to degrade undesired contaminants and destroy pathogens—both of which are harmful to crops/plants. It has also been surprisingly found that the systems and methods maintain sustainable nutrient solutions for the growing plants without toxic built up of chloramine or chloride. As such, the systems and methods can be continuously used in agriculture for a crop for weeks and months as desired. The systems and methods are not only for treatment of the fertigation water (inorganic and organic fertigation water) but also used in a preventative manner in order that pathogens do not invade the fertigation water or if any amounts of contaminant such as an pesticide finds its way into the fertigation water, it will be degraded. The systems and methods of the invention can also be used to treat organic waste solutions and in this manner, make them suitable for use as an organic fertigation water.
The systems and methods of the invention also have use in industrial process water treatment. The systems and EFC cells can be incorporated into conventional water treatment systems for prevention of contamination by pathogens and recalcitrant organic contaminants and further, treatment of a water source can make it more potable for drinking and other uses. UV can be further used on treated effluent water.
The descriptions of the various embodiments and/or examples of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments and/or examples disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application, or to enable further understanding of the embodiments disclosed herein.
A pure culture of Rhizoctonia solani was provided courtesy of Dr. Allen Xue from the Plant Pathology Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Mycelia were inoculated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) (B213400, Fisher Scientific, Canada) containing 0.1 g/L of streptomycin sulfate (BP910-50, Fisher Scientific, Canada) and 0.05 g/L of ampicillin sodium salt (BP1760-25, Fisher Scientific, Canada). The plates were then incubated on the laboratory bench inside a clear plastic container at room temperature (˜23° C.) and ambient light levels. After incubation for seven days the plates were fully covered with mycelia, at which point five 1 cm2 sections of the mycelia mat were excised from the outer edge of the petri dish and placed into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing 100 ml Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) (B254920, Fisher Scientific, Canada). The suspension was then placed in an incubator (Innova 4340, New Brunswick Scientific, USA) for 8 days at 30° C. under a 12 hr photoperiod. The cultured mycelia were then transferred to a blender (HH-362, E.F. Appliances Canada LTD.) and blended for 30 seconds. A pipette (4642110, Thermo Scientific, USA) was used to inoculate 10 ml of the suspension into new Erlenmeyer flasks with 250 mL of PDB and further incubated for another 8 days under the same conditions previously described.
Rhizoctonia solani cultures were vacuum filtered through a 1.5 μm filter disk (Whatman 934-AH) to separate the mycelia from the liquid broth. The mycelia were rinsed off the filter disk with deionized (DI) water and deposited in a 500 mL sterile beaker and filled to 300 mL with DI water. The suspension was then transferred to a blender and blended for 1 minute. The blended suspension was then added to a 60-litre reservoir containing 30 litres of DI water. This solution was then subjected to the electrochemical treatment.
The fertilizer solutions with added chloride, in the form of potassium chloride ((P330-500), Fisher Scientific, Canada), were prepared by weighing out (TE 124S, Sartorius, Germany) appropriate amounts of stock material (20-8-20 Plant Prod, 10561, Master Plant-Prod Inc., Canada; ammonium sulphate (A702-3) and potassium chloride) to bring the final solution volume to the targeted concentrations for each experiment (Table 1). The Plant Prod fertilizer consisted of Nitrate (4.3 mmol/L), Phosphate (0.55 mmol/L), Ammonium (2.64 mmol/L) and Potassium (2.80 mmol/L) at 0.5 grams per liter of solution. Other ions in trace amounts are Sulphate (40 μmol/L), Sodium (150 μmol/L), Magnesium (60 μmol/L), Calcium (30 μmol/L) and Nitrite was not initially present. Individual macronutrient ions from a 0.5 g/L solution were measured with a Shimadzu HPLC system consisting of a DGU-20A3 degasser, a SIL-10AP autosampler, two LC-20AT pumps, two CDD-10A VP conductivity detectors, CTO-20AC column oven, and CBM-20A system controller. Total Nitrogen was measured using a Shimadzu TNM-1 unit (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, USA).
The electrochemical flow cell (EFC) system used consisted of a set of six RuO2 dimensionally stable anodes (DSA) (De Nora Tech, Concord, USA) and a complementary set of five stainless steel cathodes, spaced 2 mm apart, in an acrylic casing. The total area of the anodes was 1320 cm2. Solutions entered the cell from the bottom, passed upwards through the electrodes, and exited the cell at an outflow port at the top of the housing (
The total free volume of the EFC, the internal volume of the housing less the volume of the electrode assembly, was 380 mL. The targeted contact times were achieved by adjusting the flow rates through the cell such that a given volume of solution would remain in contact with the electrodes for the desired time interval.
Untreated samples were collected from the main reservoir at the start, middle, and end of each experiment. Colony counts from each time point were averaged and used as the control or starting value for each test condition examined in a given experiment. Three effluent samples were collected from the outlet of the EFC for each treatment combination. The first sample was collected after three cell volumes (1140 ml) had passed through the flow cell, while samples two and three were collected after one and two additional flow cell volumes had passed through the system. Samples were collected in 40 ml clear plastic HDPE vials (20120121, Richard's Plastics, Canada). The pH (542, Corning, USA) and free chlorine concentration, for solutions containing chloride, were measured prior to microbial enumeration. Free chlorine from the bulk solution was measured according to the manufacturer's methods using DPD Test 'N Tube cuvette with free chlorine reagent set (2105545, Hach Company, USA) and a DR/850 portable colorimeter (4845000, Hach Company, USA). The samples were then serially diluted (101, 102, 103 and 104) in glass test tubes and a 100 μL aliquot from each was spread onto plates with PDA and antibiotics under a laminar flow hood. Plates were inverted and incubated at 30° C. under 12-hr photoperiod at 100 μmol·m−2·s−1 photosynthetically active radiation light for 2 days. Total colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) were counted after the incubation period elapsed.
Statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 14.0 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, N.C.). The residuals between data points and predicted values were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Data that did not pass were transformed and the analysis was conducted on the transformed data. Simple and multiple linear regression was performed on individual experiment sets. Summary of fit from linear regression models used the adjusted R squared values and significance was determined using α=0.05. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine any effects on [individual] nutrient composition.
A control experiment was conducted at several contact times with solutions containing R. solani, fertilizer (0.5 g/L Plant Prod), and 20 mg/L of chloride but without any applied current. There was no reduction in pathogen counts, indicating that there was no physical mechanism (e.g., a filtering effect) that may have been acting to reduce pathogen counts.
Pathogen Inactivation without the Presence of Fertilizer or Chloride
The observed inactivation under these conditions (operating voltage for this experiment was ˜32V) may be due to the acidic environment in the immediate vicinity of the anodes as low pH levels causing non-enzymatic proteolysis on the mycelial sheath of Rhizoctonia solani, ultimately leading to cell death; the higher applied potential could also induce electroporation, a process by which the cell membrane becomes increasingly permeable (increasing the porosity of the cell envelope leads to leakage of cellular material) ultimately leading to loss of function and cell death; direct oxidation of polysaccharides at the anode; protein extraction (cleavage of disulfide and/or peptide bonds due to the discharge of water and dissolved oxygen molecules) at the cathode; or reductive hydrogen peroxide production at the cathode.
Inactivation of Rhizoctonia solani in a Solution Containing Chloride
In the absence of fertilizer salts, the EFC achieved complete pathogen inactivation at all but the lowest current densities (0.76 & 1.14 mA/cm2) for the 1-min contact time when chloride (20 mg/L) was present in the solution (
Regression analysis was used to characterize the production of free chlorine as a function of contact time and current density. Results indicate that there is a significant relationship (R2=0.60; p<0.0001) between contact time and current density. The pH was shown to respond proportionally to contact time, with pH increasing from 5.5 to as high as 8.5 at the longest contact times (data not shown).
The free chlorine residuals observed (
Free Chlorine Evolution with Increasing Fertilizer and Current Density
Pathogen inactivation efficacy was demonstrated in the presence of a representative commercial fertilizer. Effluent free chlorine levels at three different concentrations of commercial fertilizer were evaluated at a fixed chloride concentration of 20 mg/L in the absence of Rhizoctonia solani (
The introduction of fertilizer clearly reduced the residual free chlorine concentrations in the test solutions (
Rhizoctonia solani Inactivation Experiments—Pathogen Inactivation in the Presence of Fertilizer
In order to determine the influence of the competing free chlorine sinks on pathogen inactivation efficacy, Rhizoctonia solani inactivation was determined in the presence of fertilizer while increasing both chloride concentrations (
When chloride concentrations were increased from 20 to 50 mg/L under the lowest current density (0.76 mA/cm2), there was a modest increase (17%) in pathogen inactivation but not sufficient to result in complete inactivation even at the 3-min contact time (
Free chlorine generation was monitored while maintaining constant current densities (0.76 mA/cm2 and 1.14 mA/cm2) over increasing chloride concentrations (20 mg/L to 50 mg/L) (
Inactivation of Rhizoctonia solani as a Function of Current Density
Increasing the current density while maintaining a constant chloride concentration (20 mg/L) increased pathogen inactivation efficacy (
When fertilizer is present in the test solution the effluent free chlorine residuals were consistently and considerably lower (<0.8 mg/L free chlorine) (
The reduction in free chlorine residuals in the presence of fertilizer containing ammonium (
Free chlorine was shown to variably increase between the current densities and the contact times applied to the solution when containing ammonium sulphate (
At higher current densities, breakpoint chlorination has been demonstrated as the most likely mechanism for the consumption of free chlorine, while lower current densities favoured the formation of secondary reactions such as nitrate generation. Breakpoint chlorination is likely the predominant secondary sink for free chlorine in the present methods, however, the consumption of excess (beyond pathogen inactivation demand) free chlorine cannot be solely relied upon as only being caused by breakpoint chlorination. Other components in fertilizer also contribute to the consumption of free chlorine, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Fe2+ and Mn2+,
Individual macronutrient ions from the 0.5 g/L fertilizer solution treated at a current density of 4.55 mA/cm2 were measured. This current density was more than sufficient to inactivate pathogens under all test conditions, yet maintained residual free chlorine levels below phytotoxic levels in the presence of fertilizer (
Higher current densities and longer contact times were also tested and found to have only minor effects on select nutrient ions (NO3−, K+ & SO42−) (data not shown). pH in the solution is regulated to control increase nitrogen loss from the fertigation solution and chloramine formation. This said, pH is routinely adjusted in production systems and at typical fertigation solution pH levels (i.e., 5.4-6.5) nitrogen should be stable. Only minor effects on macronutrient ions were noted.
The electrolytic power cost was considered for the 2.27 mA/cm2 current density profile (i.e., costs of ancillary equipment not included in calculations). This current density resulted in a high pathogen inactivation rate within a 1-min contact time or a flow rate of 380 mL/min (
An organic fertilizer was added into solution and treated with Dimensionally Stable Anodes (DSA) and Boron Doped Diamond electrodes. The solutions were measured for TOC (total organic carbon), TN (total nitrogen) and individual ions in solution noting the differences prior and after treatment using both technologies.
The source of ammonium and nitrate in fertigation solution containing organic fertilizer was determined and revealed possible mechanisms for the inactivation of fungi. Further it was determined that BDD electrodes can be used with an organic fertilizer. Organic fertilizers contain proteins and the degradation products (NH4+ and NO3−) are not readily bioavailable for plant growth. The proteins need to be converted to other forms through bacterial degradation, which can be problematic for various reasons. Electrochemical mineralization of these organics and releasing these ions is demonstrated herein to be a reliable resource for providing these essential ions for crop growth in the fertigation solution.
Using Dimensionally Stable Anodes there was no significant decrease for TOC and TN with the current density of 1.14 mA/cm2 for all contact times (
With the use of BDD electrodes, there were significant decreases in TOC for every parameter, except for the current density of 1.14 mA/cm2 and a contact time of 1-minute (
With analyzing the ions in solution using the BDD electrodes, there were clear trends by increasing nutrients within the irrigation solution. There were significant increases in calcium, nitrate, ammonium (
The BDD system shows compatibility with the use of organic fertilizers, as well as an ‘enhancement’ of the fertilizer.
It was demonstrated that a BDD-based electrochemical advanced oxidation process could achieve sufficient Rhizoctonia solani inactivation rates in fertigation solutions. Further, the effects of the process on solution fertilizer composition was determined and the phytotoxic potential of the treated solution in terms of residual disinfection products (e.g., free chlorine) was established.
A pure culture of R. solani (AG-8) isolated from wheat was provided courtesy of Dr. Allen Xue at the Plant Pathology Ottawa Research and Development Centre (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada).
The R. solani culture was vacuum filtered through 1.5 μm filter paper (Whatman 934-AH). The retained material was rinsed with deionized water to remove any residual broth remaining on the mycelia. The mycelia were weighed (TE 124S, Sartorius d=0.1 mg, Germany) to obtain the total mass of mycelia added to the solution. A concentration of 0.2 g/L of mycelia was aimed for the test solution of each experiment conducted. Mycelia were transferred to a blender (HH-362, E.F. Appliances Canada LTD, China) with 300 mL of DI water and blended for 1 minute. The suspension was then transferred to a polypropylene tank containing the irrigation test solution with fertilizer and potassium chloride added. Potassium chloride was added for selective experiments to perform electrochemical chlorination. The composition of the test solution varied between each experiment and for known test solutions is in table 1:
The electrochemical flow cell (EFC) utilized here was described previously (Lévesque et al., 2018). In the current study, the ruthenium dioxide anodes were replaced with Boron-Doped Diamond (BDD) anodes, while the stainless-steel cathodes remained. The cell volume between the electrodes was 380 mL and the flow rates 720, 380, 190 and 127 mL./min were used for experiments. The reported contact times (in minutes) approximate the time, as a function of flow rate, that the irrigation solution is in direct contact with, or in the immediate vicinity of, the surface of the electrodes during each electrochemical treatment.
A power supply (DF1730SC 20A DC power supply, Gold Source, China) was connected to the anode and cathode terminals. Throughout each experiment the applied current and voltage were monitored. Effluent samples were collected at pre-defined times and immediately analyzed to determine pH (542, Corning, USA), and free chlorine concentration (DPD Test 'N Tube cuvette with free chlorine reagent set kit; DR/850 portable colourimeter, Hach Company, USA). Untreated samples were collected from the polypropylene tank at the start, middle and end of each experiment for fungal enumeration. This allowed for a representative estimation (mean) for the initial concentration of pathogens and nutrients that enter the system before applying a treatment. All samples were collected in 40 mL clear plastic high-density polyethylene (HDPE) vials (20120121, Richard's Plastics, Canada).
Samples were serially diluted (101, 102, 103 and 104) into glass test tubes using 500 μl of the sample from the original concentration. The samples (100 μL/plate) were then inoculated onto PDA plates with antibiotics (0.1 g/L of streptomycin and 0.05 g/L of ampicillin) and spread across the plate with a sterile metal hockey stick. The plates were placed in an incubator (Innova 4340, New Brunswick Scientific, USA) at 30° C. for 48 hours under 58 μmol/m2 of light on a 12 h photoperiod. Colonies were counted after the incubation period to determine the survival rate of pathogens following the electrochemical treatment.
Individual macronutrient ions from the fertilizer solution were measured with a Shimadzu HPLC system equipped with a DGU-20A3 degasser, a SIL-10AP autosampler, two LC-20AT pumps, two CDD-10A VP conductivity detectors, CTO-20AC column oven, and CBM-20A system controller. Total nitrogen was measured using a Shimadzu TOC analyzer with a total nitrogen component attachment (TNM-1, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, USA). Perchlorate was analyzed following according to Uchikawa (1967). Samples containing fertilizer could not analyzed for perchlorate due to interference with nitrate (Uchikawa, 1967).
Statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 14.0 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, N.C.). Data was tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Data sets failing the Shapiro-Wilk test were transformed and the analysis was conducted on the transformed data. Summary of fit from linear regression models used the adjusted R squared values and significance was determined using a=0.05. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine any effects on [individual] nutrient composition.
When only R. solani is present in deionized water, a low current density of 1.14 mA/cm2 resulted in a moderate decrease in culturable R. solani (
The combination of all ROS causes damage to the cell membrane, which ruptures and releases cell constituents leading to inactivation. This combination of ROS that are contributing to inactivation rates offers explanation for the efficacy of electrochemical disinfection in removing the majority of pathogens. Although, there are some additional factors that should be considered with electrochemical disinfection. Reductions can also be explained by the acidity at the vicinity of the anodes causing structural changes to the mycelial sheath, which can cause cleavage of essential proteins. There is also the possibility of increased permeability of the mycelial membrane due to electroporation, which leads to leakage of intracellular contents into solution. It must be noted that although the current densities used for the experiment were low, the voltages where found to be high due to the absence of a supporting electrolyte. The voltage was found to vary ˜15 V with 1.14 mA/cm2 and 32 V with a current density of 2.27 mA/cm2.
Pathogen inactivation efficacy was evaluated in solutions containing fertilizer salts but no added chloride. In comparison to the results shown in
Free chlorine in the flow cell effluent was monitored while treating solutions containing 20 mg/L of chloride, added as potassium chloride (KCl), over a range of current densities, contact times and fertilizer concentrations (
The EFC system outfitted with BDD electrodes has the potential to form chlorate species. Perchlorates are particularly harmful to human health and this compound can be assimilated by crops which is species specific, but may pose a risk for consumers such that perchlorate should be monitored while only permitting concentrations under regulatory standards. Analysis of perchlorates (fertilizer free solutions only) showed that perchlorate remained below 2 μg/L (
Adding chloride to the fertigation solution further increased the inactivation rate of R. solani (
The free chlorine evolution from BDD electrodes was also monitored to ensure that the system would not release a concentration of free chlorine above the phytotoxic threshold for most major crops (2.5 mg/L) (
The individual ions comprising the fertilizer solution were monitored pre- and post-treatment at a current density of 9.09 mA/cm2 (
Applying a low current density (2.27 mA/cm2) without the presence of fertilizer or chloride in solution can inactivate 95% of R. solani. Complete inactivation was achieved with the presence of fertilizer and 20 mg/L of chloride in solution. Complete inactivation of R. solani can be achieved electrochemically using BDD anodes and stainless-steel cathodes at a current density of 2.27 mA/cm2 and contact time of 3-minutes. However, the contact time required for complete inactivation can be reduced through a concomitant increase in current density, with 9.09 mA/cm2 achieving complete inactivation after 1-minute when fertilizer and chloride are present. The complete inactivation of R. solani was achieved while maintaining acceptable nutrient balances and without a build-up of free chlorine beyond reported phytotoxic thresholds. Perchlorate generation was a concern; however, the concentration remained below accepted drinking water quality standards in the absence fertilizer. Many essential nutrients for plant growth were shown to remain constant with reaching complete inactivation (9.09 mA/cm2+fertilizer+chloride). Increases in these nutrients were shown for the ions ammonium, nitrate and sulphate. The decrease in NPOC when only the pathogen is present in solution suggests the mineralization of dissolved components are releasing these nutrients.
A randomized complete block design was arranged with 5 treatment levels (troughs) on each grow bench (both controls set up in front of one grow bench) (
Pathogen inactivation was monitored for all treatments within the first pass from reservoir 1 towards reservoir 2. F. oxysporum was found to be relatively unchanged from passing between reservoirs for the positive control. Indicating that stable colonies are passing through the irrigation system and reaching ornamental crops. The negative control treatment did not detect external fungal pathogens in the fertigation water, which determines that effects on crop growth was solely caused by the inoculated pathogen. All water treatment technologies used for disinfection was shown to achieve the complete inactivation of pathogens in fertigation solutions.
After 6 weeks of growth, all treatments exhibited significant differences in comparison to the positive control for leaf area, number of leaves, petiole length and dry weights of C. persicum (
Following treatment with DSA's, nutrients were shown to remain relatively stable with respect to plant uptake over time (
Three experiments were performed, each experiment was conducted over a total period of 2 weeks with consecutive treatments being applied 5 times per week (Monday-Friday). A schematic of the randomized block design is shown in
Microbes were not inactivated in the control treatment for experiments conducted with a fertilizer containing ammonium and/or nitrate, though, some microbes were inactivated following UV treatment (
Electrochemical treatment of the fertigation solution in Experiment 1 was shown to cause phytotoxic effects to lettuce grown in DWC (
The test solution was prepared in a 60-litre polyethylene container by adding 0.5 g/L of a powdered organic fertilizer (9-1.5-7 EZ-GRO, Canada) (Table 1) to deionized water. Experiments conducted with the electrochemical flow cell (EFC) using DSA anodes also received 10 mg/L of chloride (Cl−) by adding potassium chloride (KCl). No additional chloride was added for ozonation, AOP and electrochemical treatment with BDD anodes. The solution was constantly mixed using a magnetic stirrer to ensure homogeneity of the fertilizer. The solution was treated by all four technologies at various contact times and analyzed for changes in solution chemistry and nutrient availability for plant growth.
The solution's turbidity had decreased by 82 NTU following the treatment time of 60 minutes with BDD electrodes, while DSA's decreased by 76 NTU (
The electrochemical treatment with BDD electrodes was shown to have the highest release of nutrients compared with all other systems. The degradation of organic components following treatment with BDD released phosphate (12 mg/L), ammonium (26 mg/L), nitrate (81 mg/L), and calcium (12 mg/L) (
Culturing Lemna minor
A sterile culture of Lemna minor was obtained from the laboratory of Dr. Ryan Prosser (University of Guelph, School of Environmental Science). The culture was transferred to a 1 L Erlenmeyer flask containing a ½ strength Hoagland solution. The cultures were transferred to a growth chamber and were left for a growing period of 7 days. After the growth period, the Erlenmeyer flasks were brought to the lab to use the healthy plants for bioassay and water treatment experiments.
The temperature and humidity sensors were built in house by the Controlled Environment Systems Research Facility (CESRF) at the University of Guelph. The growth chamber conditions for humidity and temperature were recorded using an Acer Aspire 7750 laptop (P7YEO, Acer, Taiwan) and using the Termite software for data logging (version 3.4). The temperature was maintained at 25.68±0.02° C. and the relative humidity was 38.34±0.05%. Lumigrow pro 325 LED lights (LU60001, Lumigrow, USA) were used at a 80:10:10 ratio of Red:Blue:White as overhead lighting for plants (
The analysis of dose-response curves for affecting the growth of Lemna minor was determined using the ‘drc’ package (v. 3.0-1, Christian Ritz, 2016) in the statistical program RStudio (v. 1.0.153, RStudio Inc., USA). The program was used to determine the EC 50 for each measured parameter for plant health and reproduction of the number of plants, number of fronds, and the dry weights of plants contained in each flask.
Initial water treatment was performed by treating the solution by batch cell using the DSA and BDD anodes, as well as stainless steel (SS) cathodes. The experiment used a 2 L beaker and filled the beaker with 1.8 L of deionized water and dissolved the chemical standards glyphosate (45521, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) or paclobutrazol (46046, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for separate treatments. The solution was constantly mixed using a magnetic stirrer (220T, Fisher Scientific, Canada) and bar during treatment with chemical standards. Samples containing glyphosate and paclobutrazol standards were submitted to the Agriculture and Food Laboratory (University of Guelph) to quantify samples using LC-MS/MS. The mean quantifiable limit for the analytical method was 8 μg/L for glyphosate, AMPA, and paclobutrazol. The non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC) and total nitrogen (TN) of the solution were determined using a Shimadzu TOC-Vpn & TNM-1 analyzer. A calibration curve (R2=0.99) was produced before performing the sample analysis using TOC and TN standards.
Chlorination with BDD Electrodes on Lemna minor
Chlorination was performed with BDD anodes and SS cathodes by passing a solution with 20 mg/L of chloride and deionized water through an electrochemical flow cell (EFC). The flow cell configuration was performed using the same equipment (
With reference to
The total free volume of the EFC, the internal volume of the housing less the volume of the electrode assembly, was 380 mL but can be adjusted. The targeted contact times were achieved by adjusting the flow rates through the cell such that a given volume of solution would remain in contact with the electrodes for the desired time interval.
Water Treatment Methods with Commercial Pesticides
Water treatment for the recalcitrant organic pollutants (glyphosate and paclobutrazol) was performed by ozonation (O3(aq)), AOP, DSA and BDD. The irrigation solution was spiked with 7 mg/L of glyphosate (Glyfos™, FMC corporation, USA) and 3 mg/L of paclobutrazol (Bonzi™, Syngenta Canada Inc., Canada) in multiple 20 L buckets containing 10 L of deionized water. Ozonation was performed with a batch reactor that was built in house at the CESRF (
The AOP treatment was performed following ozonation with the batch reactor by opening a check valve and allowing the irrigation solution to flow through a UV chamber (model #, Greenway Water Technologies, Canada) by gravity at 310 mL/min (
The electrochemical treatments used DSA and BDD anodes with SS cathodes for both treatment methods. The EFC was configured as shown for example in
All solutions were treated with the four different water treatment methods and 75 mL of effluent solution was collected and added in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. Negative control samples only contained 75 mL of deionized water, while all other treatments (positive control, Ozone, AOP, DSA, and BDD) contained 75 mL of the treated and non-treated solution. In a separate 3-litre beaker, a full-strength Hoagland solution was prepared and mixed with a magnetic stirrer (220T, Fisher Scientific, Canada). For each of the Erlenmeyer flasks containing the treated solutions, 75 mL of the Hoagland solution was added into each flask. The dilution factor with the Hoagland solution resulted in a half strength Hoagland solution for plant growth. Lemna minor that were previously cultured and acclimated to the ‘Grid box’ were then added to each flask. Two Lemna minor plants with three fronds each were added to flasks for the experiment. All 5 treatments contained 3 Erlenmeyer flasks giving a total of 18 flasks with 36 Lemna plants and the experiment was performed in triplicate. All of the flasks were placed at random inside the growth chamber within each grid and recorded their location. The pH and electrical conductivity of the solutions were also measured after the 7-day growth period.
Statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 14.0 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, N.C.). The residuals between data points and predicted values were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Residuals that did not follow a normal distribution were transformed and the analysis was conducted on the transformed data. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the significance between treatments, with the significance of α≤0.05. All graphs used the calculated mean of samples within treatments with the standard error of the mean used for error bars.
When performing the bioassay on Lemna minor, the number of plants, fronds, and the final dry weights showed to decrease with increasing concentrations of glyphosate with respect to additional surfactants contained in Glyfosm. Significant differences were only observed at the concentration of 15 mg/L of glyphosate for the final number of fronds and the dry weight of plants (
When performing the same bioassay using paclobutrazol (Bonzi™), the results showed more profound effects on the growth and reproduction of Lemna plants. Significant decreases were observed for all tested concentrations in comparison to the control group with all of the tested parameters for plant physiological and reproductive health (
Significant differences for all measured parameters in the health of Lemna minor was between 5 and 15 mg/L for glyphosate, while paclobutrazol had significant differences at even the lowest concentration of 0.05 mg/L. An analysis of dose-response for determining the EC50 dose with glyphosate was ˜9 mg/L using the data from
The degradation of both glyphosate (8.5 mg/L) and paclobutrazol (12 mg/L) was conducted with the use of electrochemical systems for a direct comparison on their efficacies in a batch cell configuration. When applying a current density of 2.27 mA/cm2 with the presence of glyphosate, the NPOC and TN were shown to significantly decrease with contact time by both electrochemical systems (
With the same standards in solution from
The complete degradation of glyphosate (<8 μg/L) was achieved using DSA electrodes with a current density of 2.27 mA/cm2 and a contact time of 6-minutes (
With BDD electrodes, the system achieved a degradation of 72% for glyphosate with the same current density and contact time of 6-minutes (
With the presence of paclobutrazol in solution, the results were found to be opposite from what was presented with the degradation of glyphosate. The DSA electrodes showed to have a minor effect by decreasing the TN by 7% and having no significant effect on decreasing NPOC (
Degradation of paclobutrazol by BDD electrodes was shown to be more efficient in comparison to the DSA electrodes (
Effects of Chlorination with the Use of BDD Anodes
The effects of free chlorine and other chlorinated species formed such as chlorates and perchlorates were explored to evaluate potential effects on plant growth with BDD anodes. The health and reproduction of the plants were evaluated in relation to the current density applied to the solution. Significant decreases were observed with the number of fronds with current densities ≥3.42 mA/cm2(
Results shown in
The commercialized product Roundup™ was added to deionized water at a concentration of 7 mg/L for the main active compound glyphosate. The solution was treated with varying contact times by all treatment methods previously mentioned. Both electrochemical systems used a current density of 2.27 mA/cm2 with various contact times, while the ozone and AOP treatments had an injection of ozone for 10 mins reaching 4.7±0.26 mg/L O3(aq). The AOP treatment followed the ozone treatment by passing the solution through UV light with a flow rate of 310 mL/min. There were no significant differences in the number of plants, fronds, or dry weights of Lemna minor following the AOP treatment (
All of the treatments were successful at removing glyphosate to concentrations low enough to maintain healthy plants following treatment, except for ozonation (
Paclobutrazol was added in solution in the form of the commercialized product Bonzi™ at a concentration of 3 mg/L of paclobutrazol (
When 3 mg/L of paclobutrazol is in solution from the commercial product Bonzi™, all treatments did not completely remove the compound. Some of the paclobutrazol and surfactants were removed by the treatments, as partially indicated by
Recirculation Experiments with Paclobutrazol
The experiment with paclobutrazol from
Lemna Experiments (with Fertilizer Present):
The experiments described herein are repeated in the presence of fertilizer in solution (0.5 g/L of 20-8-20 plant prod fertilizer or half strength Hoagland solution).
While this disclosure has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be practical exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements. Thus it should be understood that various changes and modifications to the described embodiments herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present subject matter and without diminishing its intended advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2020/050634 | 5/8/2020 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62845302 | May 2019 | US | |
62891398 | Aug 2019 | US |