Watermarking in an encrypted domain

Abstract
Methods, apparatus and systems for embedding auxiliary information in encrypted host signals are provided. The present invention enables secure application of digital watermarks at any point in the transmission and/or distribution of digital content by enabling the insertion of a plurality of digital watermarks, without the knowledge of the encryption/decryption keys, into a digital host content that has been encrypted with an encryption key. The embedded watermarks persist throughout the content subsequent to the decryption of the content. The disclosed techniques are applicable to content that has been encrypted using a variety of different encryption techniques and algorithms, including stream ciphers, block ciphers, symmetric and asymmetric encryption algorithms. These methods are further adapted to enable the insertion of watermarks into a content that is compressed prior to encryption.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Encryption techniques are often utilized to protect multimedia content signals during their storage or transport from one location to the next. The encrypted content may be securely broadcast over the air, through the Internet, over cable networks, over wireless networks, distributed via storage media, or disseminated through other means with little concern about piracy of the content. The level of security of the encrypted content depends on, among other things, the strength of the encryption algorithm and the encryption key management and safekeeping.


Before describing the details of the present invention it is beneficial to review some common encryption algorithms and techniques. More detailed descriptions may be found in, for example, “Applied Cryptography” by B. Schneier (John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996; ISBN: 0-471-12845-7). One class of encryption algorithms, called Stream Ciphers, converts the unencrypted content into an encrypted ciphertext one bit at a time. In this case, the content (i.e., the plaintext) is treated as a stream of bits, pi, that are XORed with a stream of encryption key bits, ki, to produce the encrypted (i.e., ciphertext) bits, ci. Equation (1) describes this process mathematically:

ci=pi⊕ki   Equation (1)

The encryption key bits, ki, are typically generated independently using key stream generators known in the art. At the decryption end, the encrypted stream is XORed with an identical key stream to produce the original content. The decryption operation is mathematically represented by Equation (2).

pi=(pi⊕ki)⊕ki   Equation (2)


In another class of encryption algorithms, called Block Ciphers, the content is processed in blocks of fixed size. So for example, a digital content may first be parsed into blocks of 64 bits and then each 64-bit block may be encrypted according to the encryption algorithm. Some of the most widely used encryption algorithms such as DES and AES are block ciphers. Block ciphers may further operate in different modes. In particular, in Electronic Codebook (ECB) and Counter (CTR) modes of operation, each block is encrypted independently from other blocks in the content. In Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode, Output Feedback (OFB) mode and Cipher Feedback (CFB) mode, each encrypted block has a dependency on the neighboring ciphertext and/or plaintext blocks. Cryptographic algorithms may also be classified as symmetric or asymmetric algorithms. In symmetric algorithms the same key is used for encryption and decryption, whereas in asymmetric algorithms different keys, and possibly different algorithmic steps, are used for encryption and decryption of the content.


While access to an encrypted content may be limited to entities with proper authorization and decryption keys, once a content is decrypted, it may be readily copied and disseminated. This is particularly true for multimedia content that must inevitably be converted to audio and/or visual signals (e.g., analog format) in order to reach an audience. Watermarks are particularly well suited to plug this so-called ‘analog hole’. Digital watermarking is typically referred to as the insertion of auxiliary information bits into a host signal without producing perceptible artifacts. Watermark bits embedded into a host signal are designed to be imperceptible, robust to common content transformations, and resistant to intentional attacks that are targeted to remove or alter the watermarks. The detection of watermarks as well as the extraction of information carried in the watermarks may be used to trigger a variety of actions and enable a myriad of applications. Some of these applications include copy control, broadcast monitoring, rights management, authentication and integrity verification, forensic tracking and covert communication. Numerous watermarking algorithms and applications are described in the prior art.


Due to the complimentary roles of digital watermarking and encryption in the safekeeping and management of content, both techniques are often used to protect and manage content of significant value such as audio, video, still images, text, programming data and other information in digital or analog formats. In an example workflow of content preparation and distribution, a content may be first embedded with digital watermarks; then it may optionally be compressed (to save storage space and/or transmission bandwidth) and finally, it may be encrypted prior to being transmitted or stored outside of a secure environment. Note, that in some applications, the insertion of watermarks may alternatively, or additionally, take place after the compression of the content but prior to the encryption. In some applications, however, it may be advantageous to insert digital watermarks directly into an encrypted data stream (without first decrypting the content). For example, in a forensic tracking application, a digital movie, after appropriate post production processing, may be encrypted at the movie studio or post production house, and sent out for distribution to movie theatres, to on-line retailers, or directly to the consumer. In such applications, it is often desired to insert forensic or transactional watermarks into the movie content to identify each entity or node in the distribution channel, including the purchasers of the content, the various distributors of the content, the presentation venue and the time/date/location of each presentation or purchase. Since a multiplicity of purchase/presentation requests may be received at any given time, it is also desired to insert the watermarks expeditiously and efficiently into the content without introducing significant delays in the processing and transmission of the requested content.


One way to achieve this goal would be to, at each desired node of the distribution channel, decrypt and possibly decompress the content, insert the appropriate watermarks and then re-compress and re-encrypt the embedded content. This procedure not only requires the knowledge of the encryption/decryption algorithms as well as the presence of encryption/decryption keys at each distribution node, but is also likely to introduce significant delays in the processing of the content. While it may be possible to securely communicate the encryption/decryption keys to theses nodes and produce a secure environment for the encryption/decryption to take place, this task would require additional system design, network security operations and key management protocols which may affect the operational cost and overall security of the distribution system.


It would be advantageous to provide methods, apparatus, and systems for digital watermarking that overcome various deficiencies of the prior art by providing the capability of watermark insertion into an encrypted content signal. In particular, it would be advantageous to provide methods, apparatus, and systems for the insertion of watermarks into an encrypted digital content that do not require the decryption and subsequent re-encryption of the digital content. It would also be advantageous to allow secure insertion of digital watermarks at any point in the transmission, storage or distribution of an encrypted digital content, without the need to decrypt (and further re-encrypt) the encrypted digital host content signal, and without requiring the knowledge of the encryption/decryption keys. It would be further advantageous if such embedded watermarks were adapted to persist throughout the content after it has undergone decryption. It would be still further advantageous to enable the insertion of digital watermarks into an encrypted host content that is in a compressed format and in such a way that the embedded watermarks persist throughout the content even after decryption and decompression of the host content signal. It would be advantageous if such techniques were applicable to a host content that has been encrypted using a variety of different encryption techniques, including stream ciphers, block cipher, symmetric and asymmetric encryption algorithms.


The methods, apparatus, and systems of the present invention provide the foregoing and other advantages.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides methods, apparatus, and systems for the insertion of watermarks into an encrypted digital content that do not require decryption and subsequent re-encryption of the content.


In one example embodiment of the present invention, a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content signal is provided. A first version of a host content signal embedded with a first logical value is encrypted to produce a first encrypted signal. A second version of the host content signal embedded with a second logical value is encrypted to produce a second encrypted signal. A first set of segments from the first encrypted signal is combined with a second set of segments from the second encrypted signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.


The first and second encrypted signals may be in a compressed format. In particular, the two versions of the host content signals embedded with respective first and second logical values may be in a compressed format prior to encryption. Alternatively, they may be compressed after encryption and before transmission to a client device or user location.


The combining of the segments from the encrypted signals may be performed without the use of the encryption or decryption keys.


The embedded auxiliary information may persist throughout the host content after decryption of the composite encrypted host content.


The encrypting of the first and second versions of the host content signal may occur at a pre-processing center and the combining may occur at a user location.


A further example embodiment of the present invention provides a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content signal. A first version of an original host content signal embedded with a first logical value is encrypted to produce a first encrypted signal. A second signal comprising information corresponding to the first logical value and a second logical value embedded in the host content signal is produced. A first set of segments from the first encrypted signal is combined with a second set of segments from the second signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.


The method may further include at least one of compressing, encrypting, and scrambling the second signal.


The host content signal may be in a compressed format. For example, the encrypting may comprise encrypting of the compressed host content signal embedded with a first logical value. Further, the second signal may comprise information corresponding to the first and second logical values embedded in the compressed host content signal.


A further example embodiment of a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content signal in accordance with the present invention is provided. The host content signal is encrypted to produce an unmarked encrypted host content signal. A first signal is produced which comprises information corresponding to a first logical value embedded in the host content signal. A second signal is produced comprising information corresponding to a second logical value embedded in the host content signal. A first set of segments is selected from the first signal and a second set of segments are selected from the second signal. The first set and the second set of segments are combined with the unmarked encrypted host content in a predefined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.


The method may further include at least one of compressing, encrypting, and scrambling the first or second signal.


The host content signal may be in compressed format. In such an embodiment, the encrypting may comprise encrypting of the compressed host content signal. Similarly, the first and second signals may comprise information corresponding to first and second logical values embedded in the compressed host content signal, respectively.


The first and second signals may be transmitted to a user premises, and combined with the unmarked encrypted host content signal that resides at the user premises.


In a further example embodiment of the present invention, a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in a compressed and encrypted host content signal is provided. A first version of a compressed host content signal embedded with a first logical value is encrypted to produce a first encrypted signal. A second signal is produced which comprises information corresponding to the first logical value and a second logical value embedded in the compressed host content signal. A first set of segments from the first encrypted signal is combined with a second set of segments from the second signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.


The first encrypted signal and the second signal may comprise a matching signal interval. The combining may occur within the matching signal interval.


The first encrypted signal may comprise a partially encrypted signal.


Additional meta data corresponding to the first encrypted signal and the second signal are produced to facilitate the combining of the segments.


An example embodiment of the present invention also includes a further method for embedding auxiliary information into an encrypted host signal. In this embodiment, a first signal comprising an encrypted first version of a host signal is received, for example at a client device or user location. A second signal comprising information related to a first and a second logical values embedded in a second version of the host signal is also received. At least portions of the second signal are then combined with the first signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host signal with embedded auxiliary information.


An additional method for embedding auxiliary information into an encrypted host signal in accordance with an example embodiment the present invention is also provided. In this embodiment, an information signal corresponding to first and second logical values embedded into a first version of the host signal is received (e.g., at a client device or user location) from a pre-processing center. This information signal may then be combined with an encrypted second version of the host signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host signal with embedded auxiliary information. This encrypted version of the host signal may already be present at the client device or user location, or received thereat simultaneously with the information signal.


In any of the foregoing example embodiments, the encrypted signal may be encrypted in accordance with at least one of a stream cipher, a block cipher, a symmetric encryption algorithm, an asymmetric encryption algorithm, or the like. Further, the pre-defined manner of the combining of the segments may identify an entity or a transaction. In addition, the host content signal may comprise at least one of audio, video, text, and programming information.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawing figures, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the insertion of watermarks into a content encrypted with a stream cipher in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2A is a block diagram showing the insertion of watermarks into a content encrypted with a stream cipher in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2B is a block diagram showing the insertion of watermarks into a content encrypted with a stream cipher in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3A illustrates an Electronic Codebook (ECB) block encryption scheme;



FIG. 3B illustrates a Counter (CTR) block encryption scheme;



FIG. 3C illustrates an Output Feedback (OFB) block encryption scheme;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the insertion of watermarks into a content encrypted with a block cipher in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing the insertion of watermarks in an RSA-like encrypted content in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing the insertion of watermarks into a compressed and encrypted content in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 7 shows the insertion of specially tailored watermarks into a compressed and encrypted content in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The ensuing detailed description provides exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention. Rather, the ensuing detailed description of the exemplary embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing an embodiment of the invention. It should be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.


Several techniques for the insertion of forensic or transactional watermarks have been previously described in the literature. Some of these techniques take advantage of the fact that computationally expensive operations of the embedding process may be carried out separately, at a pre-processing center, prior to the embedding of watermarks. Once a request for the delivery of a content is received, the pre-processed versions of the content signal may be combined, without requiring computationally expensive operations, to produce a content with embedded watermarks. For example, in accordance with commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,912,315, adding forensic or transactional watermarks may be accomplished by pre-processing an original content with two or more different logical values to produce two or more embedded content signals. The two or more embedded content signals may then be transmitted to the ‘client’ (e.g., to an on-line distribution center or to a user premises), where the appropriate portions of the pre-processed signals are selected and assembled together to form an embedded content with a desired watermark value. Other variations and improvements to this technique are disclosed in commonly owned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/124,465. These improvements produce a versatile watermarking system that requires a smaller bandwidth for the transmission and storage of reduced-scale signals that enable the insertion of forensic marks. The term reduced-scale signal (as opposed to full-scale signal) is used to refer to any signal with a smaller information content than the original content. For example, such signals may have a smaller duration, dynamic range, bandwidth and/or spatial resolution than the original content.


Alternatively, as disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,301, each of two pre-processed versions of the content comprises two separate regions. The first region, called the Matching Signal Interval (MSI), either contains no watermark value or is embedded identically with the same watermark value in both pre-processed versions of the content (this is referred to as the region with ‘common watermark’). The second region, which is time interleaved with the first region, is embedded with a first or a second logical value, in the first or second pre-processed versions of the content, respectively. Transactional watermarking may be implemented by assembling proper portions of the first version of the content with proper portions of the second version of the content to produce an embedded content. The cutting and splicing of the two versions all occur within the MSI regions, where two signals are identical.


The various embodiments of the present invention enable the insertion of watermarks, such as the ones produced by the aforementioned watermarking systems, into an encrypted data stream. The disclosed methods and systems are applicable to systems that utilize stream ciphers, block ciphers, and symmetric or asymmetric encryption algorithms. In accordance with further embodiments of the present invention, such watermarks may be embedded into “compressed-and-encrypted” data signals. This is accomplished without requiring the content to be decrypted or decompressed, and without any knowledge of the encryption or decryption keys. Although most of the example embodiments of the present invention are described by illustrative examples that involve the embedding of binary watermark values, it should be understood that these techniques are readily extended to include the embedding of non-binary data symbols or embedding of multiple layers of watermarks (e.g., such as disclosed in the commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,912,315, and commonly owned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/124,465) that can be embedded and extracted independently from one another.


Stream Ciphers:


The particular methodology used to achieve the various goals of the present invention depends on the type of encryption algorithm and other configuration parameters of the media delivery and preparation system. The following describes the insertion of watermarks in example embodiments of a system that utilizes stream ciphers.


Case 0: This is the default case, where the original content signal, and/or a set of signals containing embedded logical values, is encrypted and transmitted to the target destination in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention. The received signals are then decrypted and appropriately cut-and-spliced, in accordance with any one of the above-described prior art transactional watermarking techniques, to produce a content signal with a desired watermark value. The embedded content may then be optionally re-encrypted and transmitted to the next destination. The re-encryption is typically not necessary if the content watermarking and subsequent transmission are conducted all within a secure environment. This technique is equally applicable to all types of encryption algorithms and different variations of forensic/transactional watermarking since the watermark is applied to the plaintext signal.


Case 1: In this example, illustrated in FIG. 1, two full-scale versions of the original content O signal are generated at the pre-processing stage, by embedding a first logical value in a first version of the original content signal O at embedder 102 and embedding a second logical value in a second version of the original content O at embedder 104. The term “full-scale” refers to a signal that is substantially similar to the original content signal as described in the pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/124,465. In FIG. 1, embedder 102 is shown as embedding a logical “1” in the first version of the original content signal O and embedder 104 is shown as embedding a logical “0” in the second version of the original content signal O. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that embedders 102, 104 may both be capable of embedding either logical 1s or 0s in the original content signal O.


Each full-scale version Oi,1, Oi,2 is then encrypted and transmitted to the client. This operation may be better understood by examining the following equations. The first full-scale encrypted stream, which is embedded with a first logical value, may be represented by:

ci,1=Oi,1⊕ki,   Equation (3),

where, i represents the bit position within the stream of bits in the first version of the full-scale signal, Oi,1 represents the unencrypted version of the first full-scale signal at position i, and ci,1 represents the encrypted version of the first full-scale signal at position i. The second full-scale encrypted stream, which is embedded with a second logical value, may be similarly represented by:

ci,2=Oi,2⊕ki   Equation (4),

where, Oi,2 represents the unencrypted version of the second full-scale signal at position i, and ci,2 represents the encrypted version of the second full-scale signal at position i. The encryption process occurs on a bit-by-bit basis and may comprise XORing each version with key bit stream, ki at XOR operators 106 and 108, respectively, to produce the two full scale encrypted streams Oi,1⊕ki and Oi,2⊕ki. The encryption of the two versions Oi,1, Oi,2 must occur independently from one another, but synchronously with the same encryption key stream ki. The two full scale encrypted streams Oi,1⊕ki and Oi,2⊕ki may then be transmitted over transmission channel 116 to the client side (user location or user device). At the client side, the desired portions of one stream (e.g., stream Oi,1⊕ki,) may be combined (on a bit-by-bit basis) with the desired portions of the other stream (e.g., Oi,2⊕ki) in accordance with a control signal 118 to produce a composite encrypted stream 120 with embedded watermarks.


Since the two versions are encrypted synchronously with the same key bit stream, ki, the bits of one encrypted stream Oi,1⊕ki may replace the corresponding bits of the other stream Oi,2⊕ki to form a composite data stream (watermarked signal 120). The composite signal 120 maintains its encryption and may be fully decrypted using the same encryption key stream, ki.


In FIG. 1, and in the remainder of this disclosure, the term ‘control signal’ is used to generically represent any combination of instructions, timing information, logical values or other signals that enable the assembly of particular segments of the two or more versions of the content signal. In a simple example involving the insertion of transactional watermarks in accordance with FIG. 1, a particular sequence of bits that identify the purchaser of a content may be required to be embedded into the content. The control signal 118, in this example, may simply enable the switching between the two encrypted streams at watermark bit boundary locations (e.g., using switch 117 controlled by control signal 118). For example, if the watermarking scheme calls for watermarking bits that span 100 samples of the host content signal, the switching occurs at content bit locations 101, 201, 301, . . . . Obviously, if the present watermark bit has the same value as the previous watermark bit, no switching needs to occur for the present bit duration. In other examples, the generation of the control signal 118 may include more complicated operations. These operations may involve the generation of auxiliary information that comprise watermark payload (e.g., the generation of a time stamp from local clock), the generation of synchronization sequences, the generation or selection of bit transition functions, the application of various channel coding techniques, such as error correction codes, and other necessary operations to produce a stream of logical values that are subsequently embedded into the content.


The transmission channel 116 shown in FIG. 1 represents any one or more of a variety of communication channels that may be used to transmit or store information. Examples of such communication channels include, but are not limited to, the Internet, local area networks, wide area networks, satellite and over-the-air broadcast channels, magnetic, optical or electronic storage devices, and the like.


Case 2A: In the example embodiment shown in FIG. 2A, three signals are transmitted to the client side. One full-scale signal is a version of the original host content signal O. This version of the original host content signal Oi is encrypted on a bit-by-bit basis at XOR operator 110 to produce encrypted stream Oi⊕ki. The other two signals are produced by first embedding two logical values in separate versions of the original content signal O (at embedders 102 and 104) to produce two embedded signals Oi,1 and Oi,2 as discussed above in connection with FIG. 1. These signals Oi,1 and Oi,2 are next XORed with the original signal Oi at XOR operators 200, 202, respectively to produce signals Oi,1⊕Oi and Oi,2⊕Oi. Signals Oi,1⊕Oi and Oi,2⊕Oi are optionally compressed, scrambled or encrypted (e.g., at compress/scramble/ encrypt module 204) prior to their transmission over transmission channel 116 to the client side (e.g., a user location or user device).


These optional operations at module 204 may be necessary to reduce the transmission bandwidth and to enhance the security of the transmitted signals. The information content of the generated signals, Oi,1⊕Oi and Oi,2⊕Oi, is typically substantially smaller than the original content signal since these signals are produced by XORing two substantially similar signals (recall that XOR operation produces a ‘1’ value only if the two operands are different). Thus the signals generated by XOR operations may comprise many zeroes, a property that makes them a good candidate for the application of lossless compression techniques. In other cases, where the embedded and original signals contain large differences (for example, as a result of applying watermark masking/concealment techniques during the embedding process), such compression techniques may not be as effective.


Upon the reception and appropriate decompression, descrambling or decryption at module 208, appropriate portions of the signals Oi,1⊕Oi and Oi,2⊕Oi may be XORed (e.g., at XOR operator 210) with the original encrypted content, Oi⊕ki, in accordance with the control signal 218A, producing a final composite encrypted watermarked signal 220, portions of which contain the first embedded watermark value (e.g., a logical “1”) and portions of which contain the second embedded watermark value (e.g., a logical “0”).


One of the features of the watermarking technique described in FIG. 2A is its ability to decouple watermarking and encryption operations. In other words, the embedders 102, 104 and XOR operators 200, 202 in this architecture do not need access to the encryption keys at all. In addition, the original signal O remains intact and can be independently transmitted to other destinations that do not require (or perhaps forbid) the presence of embedded watermarks. Using this technique, it is also possible to produce the appropriate watermark signals for a content that is already at a user premises. In this case, if an exact copy of the original content signal O is available at the pre-processing center, the signals Oi⊕Oi and Oi,2⊕Oi may be generated and transmitted to the user. This allows dynamic modifications of watermarking techniques and parameters that can be subsequently transmitted to the client for insertion of the watermark.


Case 2B: The example embodiment shown in FIG. 2B is similar to Case 2A above, with the exception that only two signals are generated and transmitted to the desired destination. The two streams, Oi,1 and Oi,2, are produced by embedding separate versions of the original content signal O with the first and second logical values at embedders 102, 104 as discussed above in connection with FIGS. 1 and 2A. These signals, Oi,1 and Oi,2 and are XORed with each other at XOR operator 206 to produce the signal Oi,1⊕Oi,2. Similar to the reasoning discussed above in Case 2A, this signal may contain a larger proportion of zero-valued bits and may be a good candidate for the application of a lossless compression technique. Further scrambling and encryption operations may also be applied (e.g., at module 204) to protect this signal prior to transmission to the client over transmission channel 116. Appropriate decompression, descrambling or decryption may be applied as necessary to signal Oi,1⊕Oi,2 at module 208.


One of the embedded content signals (i.e., the signal Oi,2 in the example embodiment of FIG. 2B) is encrypted on a bit-by-bit basis with encryption key stream ki at XOR operator 108 to produce Oi,2⊕ki which is also transmitted to the client side over transmission channel 116. On the reception side, the signal Oi,1⊕Oi,2 may be XORed with the signal Oi,2⊕ki at XOR operator 210 in accordance with a control signal 218B to produce an encrypted watermarked content signal 220 with appropriate embedded watermark values. In the example embodiment of FIG. 2B, when the switch 117 is in open position, the encrypted signal Oi,2⊕ki appears unchanged at the output of the XOR operator 210. When in accordance with the control signal 218B, the switch 117 is flipped to a closed position, a portion of the signal Oi,1⊕Oi,2 is XORed with a corresponding portion of the encrypted signal Oi,2⊕ki, producing an encrypted segment Oi,1⊕ki at the output of the XOR operator 210.


The example watermarking technique described in connection with FIG. 2B produces the same embedded content as the that produced by the example watermarking technique described in connection with FIG. 2A, but it requires a smaller transmission bandwidth. In the architecture of FIG. 2B, it only suffices to transmit two signals to the client, one of which, namely Oi,1⊕Oi,2, is a reduced-scale signal (or can be converted to a reduced-scale signal).


Block Ciphers:


The above described watermark insertion techniques described in the context of stream ciphers may be readily adapted to operate with block encryption algorithms. FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C provide schematic diagrams of three typical block encryption modes of operation that are well known in the art. In Electronic Code Book (ECB) mode of FIG. 3A, each block of content data (plaintext) is replaced by an alternate block of encrypted data of the same size (ciphertext). In the Counter (CTR) mode of operation shown in FIG. 3B, encryption key blocks (ciphertext blocks) are generated for each data block (plaintext) by encrypting successive values of a “counter”. The counter can be any simple function which produces a sequence which is guaranteed not to repeat for a long time. In Output Feedback (OFB) mode of operation shown in FIG. 3C, an initialization vector (IV) (which can be a random number) is used to generate the encryption key for the first block of plaintext; this key is used to generate other encryption keys for the subsequent blocks of plaintext. In both the CTR and OFB configurations, the generated key blocks are XORed with the plaintext blocks to form the block encrypted content signal.


The insertion of watermarks into such block encrypted data streams can be done by adjusting a few watermark design parameters. One such adjustment would be to select the watermark bit durations to be an integer multiple of cipher block size. For example, an audio stream with 16-bit sample values and a block cipher size of 128 bits may be used. The watermarking system may be designed to embed a single watermark bit into 440 samples of the audio content (this corresponds to a watermark bit rate of approximately 100 bits per second for a 44.1 KHz audio signal). Thus 440×16=7040 bits of the host signal would be required for the embedding of each watermark bit. If the audio signal were encrypted in blocks of 128 bits, then 740/128=55 cipher blocks would be required to carry each watermark bit. An exemplary procedure would involve the embedding of the host signal with two different logical values to produce two embedded signals, wherein each embedded logical value spans 440 samples of the host signal. Each of the two embedded signals produced this way may then be grouped into 128-bit blocks, encrypted, and transmitted to the desired destination. The encryption must take place synchronously for both versions of the embedded content signal with the same encryption key. FIG. 4 describes an exemplary embodiment of this procedure. The ‘1’ and ‘0’ embedding modules 102, 104 produce two embedded signals Oi,1 and Oi,2 from the original content signal O such that each embedded watermark symbol spans one or more full encryption blocks. The embedded signals, Oi,1 and Oi,2, are next encrypted by the block encryptor modules 400, 402 to generate encrypted signals OBK,1 and OBK,2, which can then be transmitted to the client via transmission channel 116. In FIG. 4, the subscript B designates the block processed signal samples and the subscript K is used to designate such blocks that are encrypted. Upon the reception of encrypted block signals OBK,1 and OBK,2, appropriate portions of these signals are selected in accordance with the control signal 418, and assembled together to produce an embedded content signal 420. Using the exemplary numerical values discussed earlier, the control signal 418 must switch between the two signals at multiples of 55 encryption blocks (i.e., 1 embedded watermark bit) or 740 encrypted bits.


The above technique may be modified to conform to other encryption block sizes, sampling rates or bit depth values. These modifications may produce different watermark bit rates in order to make the duration of each watermark bit an integer multiple of encryption block size. For example, if the bit depth of the incoming audio signal in the above example were to become 32 bits, a watermark bit rate of approximately 200 bits-per-second would be required to produce the same number of blocks per bit (i.e., 55, 128-bit encryption blocks per watermark bit). Alternatively, the number of blocks-per-watermark-bit may be changed from 55 to 110 to maintain the watermark bit rate at ˜100 bits-per-second while accommodating 32-bit audio sample values. Furthermore, the extension of the above described technique to other embedding configurations, such as the ones described in FIGS. 2A and 2B, is similarly accomplished by replacing the bit-wise operations by block-wise operations.


Asymmetric and Public-Key Algorithms


The methods and systems of the various embodiments of the present invention can also be used in conjunction with asymmetric encryption algorithms. These algorithms use different keys for encryption and decryption of the content and may involve different algorithmic operations for encryption and decryption processes. It is important to note that the previously disclosed analysis did not require any references or knowledge of decryption keys or decryption algorithms. Thus, these systems and methods may be readily adapted to operate with asymmetric algorithms, as well. In addition, some asymmetric algorithms require modular arithmetic operations, including exponentiation; these operations and the necessary modifications to the watermark insertion techniques of the present invention will be discussed below.


RSA is one of the most widely used asymmetric encryption algorithms. RSA uses one key, called the public key, for encryption and another key, called the private key, for decryption of the content. The details of RSA encryption algorithm may be found in a many publications such as, B. Schneier's “Applied Cryptography”, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996; ISBN: 0-471-12845-7. The basic RSA encryption operation can be described by the following equation:

c=Ok[modulo n]   Equation (5),

where c is the encrypted data, O is the original, unencrypted data, k is the encryption key, and n is an encryption parameter that is a product of two random prime numbers. In a public-key encryption algorithm, k and n are known public parameters. The decryption is carried out according to the Equation 6:

O=cd[modulo n]   Equation (6),

where d is the private key and is only known to authorized parties. The encryption and decryption operations are carried out in modulo-n arithmetic. Modular arithmetic, and various hardware implementations thereof, is well known in the art and is described in many publications such as, David N. Amanor, “Efficient Hardware Architecture for Modular Manipulation”, Master's Thesis, Communications and Media Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Offenburg, Germany, February 2005. In order to encrypt a signal, the signal is typically broken up into smaller numerical blocks. The RSA (or similar asymmetric) encryption algorithm can be better illustrated by considering the following numerical example.


Let's assume O=688232678, n=3337, d=1019 and block size=3 digits. The original signal O may be broken up into blocks of 3 digits, namely:

    • O(1)=688,
    • O(2)=232, and
    • O(3)=678.


      Each block may then be encrypted to produce:
    • c(1)=1570,
    • c(2)=2756, and
    • c(3)=2091.


      The encrypted message would then be the concatenation of encrypted blocks:
    • c=157027562091.


      In the watermarking system of the present invention, each pre-processed version of the original content contains one logical value. For example, the embedding process may produce two embedded sample values in the following manner:
    • O1(1)=698, O2(1)=678,
    • O1(2)=240, O2(2)=212,
    • O1(3)=700, O2(3)=670,


      where O1 and O2 represent the embedded signals with the first and second logical values, respectively. These signals are subsequently encrypted to produce encrypted signals that are transmitted to the client. The insertion of watermarks into the encrypted stream then becomes identical to the situation that was described above in connection with FIG. 4. Portions of the received encrypted signals may then be selected in accordance to a control signal and spliced together to form an encrypted content signal with a particular watermark value. Since the encryption occurs in blocks, the same watermark design considerations that were discussed in connection with FIG. 4 are applicable.


It is also possible to apply the above techniques to produce systems that are analogous to the ones described in FIGS. 2A and 2B. For illustration purposes, only the configuration of FIG. 2B will be analyzed since those skilled in the art will appreciate that similar procedures may be adapted and used in conjunction with the system of FIG. 2A. The basic idea behind this concept is that a first version of the content embedded with a first logical value, that is also encrypted with an RSA-like algorithm, may be converted to a second version of the content embedded with a second logical value, that is also encrypted, using a multiplicative factor. In order to facilitate the understanding of this concept, the encrypted blocks, O1(1)=698 and O2(1)=678, in the above numerical example are examined. The two embedded blocks O1(1) and O1(2) are related to one another by a multiplicative factor (i.e., O1(1)=(698/678)*O1(2) ). In modulo arithmetic this relationship is expressed as: O1[modulo n]=X*O2. Determination of the factor X involves modulo division, which is well known in the art and will not be described here. The embedding of watermarks in accordance to the present invention may be carried out using modulo arithmetic as illustrated in the example embodiment shown FIG. 5. Separate versions of the original content signal O are embedded with logical values at embedders 102 and 104 to produce two embedded content signals, Oi,1 and Oi,2. The two embedded content signals, Oi,1 and Oi,2, are encrypted (in this context with an RSA-like algorithm) at encryption modules 500, 502, respectively, to produce the signals OE,1 and OE,2. Next, the multiplicative factors, XE, that relate the two embedded content signals, are determined using divider module 508. The subscript E is used to indicate that the multiplicative factors are determined for each encryption unit (i.e., units of bits that are encrypted together). This multiplicative factor may be calculated based on specific parameters of the encryption algorithm using modulo arithmetic. For the RSA example described above, only the knowledge of the public parameter n and the block size (i.e., 3 digits) is required at both the pre-processing center (e.g., operations prior to transmission over transmission channel 116) and at the client premises (e.g., a user location or device capable or carrying out operations occurring after transmission). The multiplicative factors XE may be compressed, scrambled, or encrypted at module 204 as required prior to transmission over transmission channel 116. On the reception side, the multiplicative factors, XE, may be decompressed, descrambled, or decrypted as needed at module 208. The multiplicative factors XE may then be multiplied by the second embedded content, OE,2, at multiplier 512 in accordance with a control signal 518 to produce an encrypted content 520 with embedded watermark values. The multiplier module 512 may multiply OE,2 by either XE or 1 (i.e., pass OE,2 through unchanged) to produce an encrypted output signal that contains appropriate concatenations of OE,1 and OE,2.


While the above examples illustrated the application of the present invention to an RSA-like encryption algorithm, the presented techniques are equally applicable to other asymmetric encryption algorithms, including but not limited to, Pohlig-Hellman, Rabin, ElGamal as well as elliptical curve encryption algorithms.


Insertion of Watermarks into Compressed Domain


The above-described techniques for the insertion of forensic watermarks may be adapted to operate with an original content signal that is in a compressed format. For a majority of compression schemes, data signals are divided into blocks that are subsequently compressed using a variety of techniques. Examples of such compression algorithms include MPEG, JPEG, JPEG2000, AAC, AC3, and the like. What is important is for the particular compression technique to operate on blocks of signal content that can be independently compressed and decompressed. In MPEG compression, for example, a Group of Pictures (GOP) may be considered an independent compression block. FIG. 6 shows an example embodiment of the present invention that includes compression. Other component of this figure are similar to the ones described above in connection with FIG. 2B (except for the “compression” blocks 600, 602 that compress the embedded versions of the original content).


As shown in FIG. 6, separate versions of the original content signal O are embedded with logical values at embedders 102 and 104 to produce two embedded content signals, Oi,1 and Oi,2. These signals Oi,1 and Oi,2 are compressed at compression modules 600, 602, respectively. The signals at the output of the two compression modules 600, 602 are labeled OC,1 and OC,2, respectively, in order to designate compressed signals that are generated in independent blocks (i.e., compression blocks). In the upper path, signals OC,1 and OC,2 are XORed together at XOR operator 606 on a compression block-by-block basis to produce a “difference” signal between the two versions of the embedded-and-compressed signals. The difference signal output from XOR operator 606 is designated OC,1⊕OC,2. The difference signal OC,1⊕OC,2 may be compressed, scrambled, or encrypted at module 204 as required prior to transmission over transmission channel 116. In the lower path, OC,2 is XORed with the key sequence, ki, at XOR operator 608, on a bit-by-bit basis to produce an encrypted stream OC,2⊕ki. On the reception side, the signal OC,1⊕OC,2 may be decompressed, descrambled, or decrypted as needed at module 208. One or more blocks of the signal OC,1⊕OC,2 may then be appropriately selected in accordance with a control signal 618 and XORed with the signal OC,2⊕ki at XOR operator 619 to produce a compressed-and-encrypted signal 620 with the desired forensic watermark. The operation of the switch 117 of FIG. 6 is similar to the operation described in relation with FIG. 2B.


Similarly, the embodiments shown in FIGS. 1, 2A, 4, and 5 may employed where the original content signal is first embedded with the logical values and then compressed, as indicated by the optional compression modules 600 and 602 (shown in dashed lines in FIGS. 1, 2A, 4, and 5). The embodiment shown in FIG. 2A includes an additional optional compression module 603 for compressing the unmarked original content stream Oi, which is then provided to XOR operators 110, 200, and 202. When the techniques described in connection with the example embodiment of FIG. 6 are applied to the example embodiments of FIG. 1 and FIG. 2A that employ a stream cipher, it should be noted that the embedded watermark bit boundaries must coincide with, or be completely within, the compression block boundaries in order to guarantee the presence of full-length watermark bits in the final watermarked content. This requirement can be met by proper selection of watermarking parameters. Besides, most well designed watermarking systems can tolerate a certain level of watermark bit errors. Thus occasional failures to meet the above design criteria should not significantly interfere with proper detection of inserted watermarks. There are also additional watermarking techniques that can further alleviate this problem. These techniques will be described below in the context of block ciphers.


In a block cipher environment, the operations of the forensic embedder may need further adjustments since two different block types are present: compression blocks and encryption blocks. The former often comprises a variable number of bits while the latter typically comprises a fixed number of bits. For example, in DES encryption algorithm, each block always comprises 64 bits of encrypted data, while a GOP block of compressed MPEG image data may contain any number of bits, depending on the particular nature of the motion picture frame sequence and the compression parameters. In such cases, it may not be possible to align the embedded bit boundaries, the compression block boundaries, and the encryption block boundaries all at the same time. In such cases, the general embedding technique may be modified in accordance with the technique described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,301 that was described earlier. Using this technique, embedded logical values may be separated by regions of the original content that are either A) not embedded at all, or B) are embedded with a common watermark in both versions of the embedded content. FIG. 7 shows an example embodiment of this technique used in conjunction with the present invention. Two versions of the original content 701 and 702 are shown to be embedded with logical 1 and logical 0 values, as well as containing Matching Signal Intervals (MSI) blocks 706, which are identically produced in both versions of the embedded signals 701 and 702. Each version of the content may be compressed and encrypted. As shown in FIG. 7, compression blocks 703 may have different lengths and may span several encryption blocks 704. In practical situations, each encryption block 704 is typically made up of 64 or 128 bits while a typical JPEG image frame may comprise several thousands of bits. The simplified diagram of FIG. 7 can be used to illustrate a scenario where there is at least one cutting-and-splicing opportunity within each MSI block 706. In FIG. 7, the duration of MSI segments 706 are shown to be equal, but it is understood that MSI segments 706 may be selected to have different lengths. If the watermarking algorithm of FIG. 7 is used for the embedding of the content, the insertion of watermarks may be carried out similar to the technique described in connection with FIG. 4. The two versions of the encrypted content may be transmitted, on the client side, combined together along the potential splicing points 705 to form an embedded content. The splicing must occur at the encryption block boundaries and must take place within the MSI region. Other variations of the embedding technique, i.e., block-based operations analogous to the ones shown in FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B, may be implemented using the embedding algorithm of FIG. 7. The modifications necessary to produce these systems involve obvious re-arrangements of the above-described techniques and will not be discussed further.


Three design guidelines related to the selection of MSI blocks warrant further attention: 1) there must exist at least one splicing opportunity (splicing point 705) within each MSI block 706; 2) MSI boundaries must be aligned with compression block boundaries; and 3) a watermark bit must fit within a single compression block 703. The first design guideline can be guaranteed by creating MSI segments that are at least twice the size of encryption blocks 704. The second guideline requires each MSI to span one or more complete compression blocks 703. Both of these conditions can be easily satisfied since an MSI region may be selected to be the unmarked original content of an arbitrary length. As for the third guideline, in practical situations, each compression block 703 usually comprises several thousands of bits whereas a typical watermark bit only spans a few tens or hundreds of bits. Furthermore, in an unlikely case where a watermark bit can not fit in a single compression block 703, signal cutting and splicing can occur, for example, at every two compression block boundaries. It is however more likely that each watermark bit is embedded in only a portion of each compression block 703. This can occur, for example, in an MPEG-compressed signal where a watermark bit is embedded in an I-frame only, while the compression block 703 is a GOP, comprising several additional P and B frames. In such cases, the unmarked portions of the compression block 703 may simply be considered as extensions of the adjacent MSI regions 706.


Since the cutting and splicing of the two compressed and encrypted data streams must occur at the compression block boundaries, the boundary locations must be known at the client side. In some cases, it may be possible to preserve the format of the compressed data stream subsequent to encryption. For example, in an MPEG compressed video, only the data within each GOP may be encrypted while keeping some meta data and header information in unencrypted format. This way, while the actual image/audio data is encrypted, the compression block boundaries remain easily recognizable. Such partial encryption of the signal content, however, may weaken the security of the system. In systems where the entire signal content is encrypted, additional synchronization and compression block boundary information may need to be delivered to the client. This can be accomplished by transmitting this additional information together with, or separately from, the embedded content signals. Table 1 below shows an example of how such information may be generated for proper identification of compression blocks.















TABLE 1









Compression
Stream 1 Index

Stream 2 Index














Block Number
Start Bit
End Bit
Start Bit
End Bit

















1
100
5094
100
5090



2 (MSI)
5095
14258
5091
14300



3
15001
15268
14301
15250



4 (MSI)
15269
19269
15251
19298



5
19270
23684
19299
23701



6 (MSI)
23685
35248
23702
35221



. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .










For example, according to Table 1, the first compression block starts at bit location 100 in both encrypted streams and ends at bit locations 5094 and 5090 in streams 1 and 2, respectively. Using the example technique of Table 1, non-data segments of the compressed data streams may be easily identified and avoided when the cut-and-splice watermarking is carried out.


Table 1 provides only an example embodiment of the present invention and it should be appreciated that there are many different ways of conveying the compression block boundaries. For example, boundary locations may be expressed in terms of encryption block numbers (instead of bit numbers) or they may be expressed in terms relative to other compression blocks. It is also possible to separately identify non-data fields (e.g., headers, metadata, etc.) or other fields of interest within a table similar to the one shown in Table 1. Furthermore, the above described methods may be modified to be used in conjunction with other watermarking techniques that insert digital watermarks into a compressed data stream. One such technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,687,191.


While specific examples were used in the foregoing disclosure to illustrate the embodiments of the present invention in association with one or more particular configurations of a watermarking system, it is understood that these techniques can be easily adapted to conform to alternate configurations of these watermarking systems. For example, in various embodiments of the present invention, such as those described in FIG. 1-2 and 4-7, multiple watermark embedding or encryption modules were presented to facilitate the understanding of disclosed concepts. However, it is understood that a single watermarking or encryption module may perform the necessary operations for all signal paths. Furthermore, the techniques disclosed in accordance with the present invention can be used in conjunction with data scrambling techniques that may not technically be classified as encryption algorithms. All necessary modifications required to adapt the present invention to such systems are considered to be well within the capabilities of a person of ordinary skills in the art and are not disclosed further.


It should now be appreciated that the present invention provides advantageous methods and apparatus for watermarking encrypted data streams.


Although the invention has been described in connection with various illustrated embodiments, numerous modifications and adaptations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content, comprising: produce a first encrypted content by (a) obtaining a plurality of segments of an original host content, (b) embedding each of said plurality of segments with a first logical value and (c) using a first encryption key or first set of encryption keys for encrypting each of said plurality of segments after having been embedded with said first logical value;producing a second content that is not in encrypted format by (a) embedding a second logical value into said plurality of segments of said original host content and (b) modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said second logical value with a corresponding segment that is embedded with said first logical value, said corresponding segment being perceptually similar to said particular segment but for having said first logical value embedded therein instead of said second logical value; andcombining a first set of segments from said first encrypted content with a second set of segments from said second content in a pre-defined manner, without decrypting said first encrypted content, to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information, wherein said composite encrypted host content is decryptable using said first encryption key or said first set of encryption keys.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said combining is performed without using encryption or decryption keys.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said embedded auxiliary information persists throughout said host content after decryption of said composite encrypted host content.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said first and second content are produced at a pre-processing center and said combining occurs at a user location.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said host content comprises at least one of audio, video, text, and programming information.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said first encrypted content is encrypted in accordance with at least one of: a stream cipher,a block cipher,a symmetric encryption algorithm, andan asymmetric encryption algorithm.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising at least one of compressing, encrypting, or scrambling said second content and subsequently performing one of compressing, decrypting or descrambling prior to said combining.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said pre-defined manner identifies at least one of an entity and a transaction.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said host content comprises at least one of audio, video, text, and programming information.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: compressing said plurality of segments after embedding with said first logical value and after embedding with said second logical value, wherein:said encrypting comprises encrypting said compressed segments subsequent to said compressing; andsaid modifying comprises modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said second logical value and subsequently compressed with said corresponding segment that is embedded with said first logical value and subsequently compressed.
  • 11. A method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content, comprising: encrypting original host content using a first encryption key or first set of encryption keys to produce an unmarked encrypted host content;producing a first content that is not in encrypted format by (a) obtaining a plurality of segments of said original host content (b) embedding each of said plurality of segments with a first logical value and (c) modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said first logical value with a corresponding segment from said original host content, said corresponding segment being perceptually similar to said particular segment that is embedded with said first logical value but lacking said embedded first logical value;producing a second content that is not in encrypted format by (a) embedding a second logical value into said plurality of segments of said original host content and (b) modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said first logical value with a corresponding segment from said original host content, said corresponding segment being perceptually similar to said particular segment that is embedded with said second logical value but lacking said embedded second logical value;selecting a first set of segments from said first content;selecting a second set of segments from said second content; andcombining said first set and said second set of segments with said unmarked encrypted host content in a predefined manner, without decrypting said unmarked encrypted host content, to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information, wherein said composite encrypted host content is decryptable using said first encryption key or said first set of encryption keys.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein said unmarked encrypted host content is encrypted in accordance with at least one of: a stream cipher,a block cipher,a symmetric encryption algorithm, andan asymmetric encryption algorithm.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, further comprising at least one of compressing, encrypting, or scrambling said first and second content and subsequently performing one of compressing, decrypting or descrambling prior to said combining.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, further comprising: compressing said original host content prior to encrypting said original host content; andcompressing said plurality of segments after embedding with said first logical value and after embedding with said second logical value, wherein:said encrypting comprises encrypting said compressed original host content; andsaid modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said first or second logical values comprises modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said first or second logical values and subsequently compressed with said corresponding segment from said original host content subsequent to compression but prior to encryption of said original host content.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein said first and second contents are transmitted to a user premises, and combined with said unmarked encrypted host content that resides at said user premises.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein said pre-defined manner identifies at least one of an entity and a transaction.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein said host content comprises at least one of audio, video, text, and programming information.
  • 18. A method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in a compressed and encrypted host content, comprising: producing a first compressed-and-encrypted content by encrypting a first version of a compressed host content, said first version of said compressed host content having been produced by (a) obtaining a plurality of segments of an original host content, (b) embedding each of said plurality of segments with a first logical value, and (c) compressing said plurality of segments subsequent to said embedding of said first logical value;producing a second compressed-and-encrypted content by (a) embedding a second logical value into each of said plurality of segments of said original host content, (b) compressing said plurality of segments subsequent to said embedding of said second logical value, (c) encrypting said plurality of segments subsequent to said compressing and (d) modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said second logical value and subsequently compressed and encrypted with a corresponding segment that is embedded with said first logical value and subsequently compressed and encrypted, said corresponding segment being perceptually similar to said particular segment prior to said compressing but for having said first logical value embedded therein instead of said second logical value; andcombining a first set of segments from said first compressed-and-encrypted content with a second set of segments from said second compressed-and-encrypted content in a pre-defined manner, without decrypting or decompressing either the first set of segments or the second set of segments, to produce a composite compressed-and-encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein said first compressed-and-encrypted content and said second compressed-and-content comprise a matching signal interval.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein said combining occurs within said matching signal interval.
  • 21. The method of claim 18, wherein said first compressed-and-encrypted content comprises a partially encrypted content.
  • 22. The method of claim 18, wherein additional meta data corresponding to said first compressed-and-encrypted content and said second compressed-and-encrypted content are produced to facilitate said combining.
  • 23. The method of claim 18, wherein said first encrypted content is encrypted in accordance with at least one of: a stream cipher,a block cipher,a symmetric encryption algorithm, andan asymmetric encryption algorithm.
  • 24. The method of claim 18, wherein said pre-defined manner identifies at least one of an entity and a transaction.
  • 25. The method of claim 18, wherein said host content comprises at least one of audio, video, text, and programming information.
  • 26. A method for embedding auxiliary information into an encrypted host, comprising: receiving a first content that is in encrypted format, the first content comprising a plurality of embedded segments, each of said plurality of embedded segments corresponding to a segment of an original host content having been embedded with a first logical value and subsequently having been encrypted using a first encryption key or set of encryption keys;receiving a second content that is not in encrypted format, the second content having been produced by (a) embedding a second logical value into said plurality of segments of said original host content and (b) modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said second logical value with a corresponding segment that is embedded with said first logical value, said corresponding segment being perceptually similar to said particular segment but for having said first logical value embedded therein instead of said second logical value; andcombining at least portions of said second content with said first content in a pre-defined manner, without decrypting said first encrypted content, to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information, wherein said composite encrypted host content is decryptable using said first encryption key or said first set of encryption keys.
  • 27. A method for embedding auxiliary information into an encrypted host content, comprising: receiving a first content and a second content from a pre-processing center,said first content having been produced by (a) obtaining a plurality of segments of an original host content (b) embedding each of said plurality of segments with a first logical value and (c) modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said first logical value with a corresponding segment from said original host content, said corresponding segment being perceptually similar to said particular segment that is embedded with said first logical value but lacking said embedded first logical value,said second content having been produced by (a) embedding a second logical value into said plurality of segments of said original host content and (b) modifying each particular segment that is embedded with said first logical value with a corresponding segment from said original host content, said corresponding segment being perceptually similar to said particular segment that is embedded with said second logical value but lacking said embedded second logical value; andcombining said particular segments of first and second contents that are in unencrypted format with segments from an encrypted and unmarked version of said original host content in a pre-defined manner, without decrypting said encrypted and unmarked version of said original host content, to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information, said encrypted and unmarked version of said original host content having been produced by encrypting segments of said original host content using a first encryption key or first set of encryption keys, wherein said composite encrypted host content is decryptable using said first encryption key or said first set of encryption keys.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application No. 60/697,515 filed on Jul. 7, 2005, which is incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference for all purposes as if set forth herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (568)
Number Name Date Kind
3406344 Hopper Oct 1968 A
3842196 Loughlin Oct 1974 A
3885217 Cintron May 1975 A
3894190 Gassmann Jul 1975 A
3919479 Moon et al. Nov 1975 A
3973206 Haselwood et al. Aug 1976 A
4048562 Haselwood et al. Sep 1977 A
4176379 Wessler et al. Nov 1979 A
4199788 Tsujimura Apr 1980 A
4225967 Miwa et al. Sep 1980 A
4230990 Lert, Jr. et al. Oct 1980 A
4281217 Dolby Jul 1981 A
4295128 Hashemian et al. Oct 1981 A
4425578 Haselwood et al. Jan 1984 A
4454610 Sziklai Jun 1984 A
4464656 Nakamura Aug 1984 A
4497060 Yang Jan 1985 A
4512013 Nash et al. Apr 1985 A
4547804 Greenberg Oct 1985 A
4564862 Cohen Jan 1986 A
4593904 Graves Jun 1986 A
4639779 Greenberg Jan 1987 A
4669089 Gahagan et al. May 1987 A
4677466 Lert, Jr. et al. Jun 1987 A
4686707 Iwasaki et al. Aug 1987 A
4703476 Howard Oct 1987 A
4706282 Knowd Nov 1987 A
4723302 Fulmer et al. Feb 1988 A
4729398 Benson et al. Mar 1988 A
4739398 Thomas et al. Apr 1988 A
4750173 Bluthgen Jun 1988 A
4755871 Morales-Garza et al. Jul 1988 A
4755884 Efron et al. Jul 1988 A
4764608 Masuzawa et al. Aug 1988 A
4764808 Solar Aug 1988 A
4789863 Bush Dec 1988 A
4805020 Greenberg Feb 1989 A
4807013 Manocha Feb 1989 A
4807031 Broughton et al. Feb 1989 A
4840602 Rose Jun 1989 A
4843562 Kenyon et al. Jun 1989 A
4876617 Best et al. Oct 1989 A
4876736 Kiewit Oct 1989 A
4930011 Kiewit May 1990 A
4931871 Kramer Jun 1990 A
4937807 Weitz et al. Jun 1990 A
4939515 Adelson Jul 1990 A
4943963 Waechter et al. Jul 1990 A
4945412 Kramer Jul 1990 A
4967273 Greenberg Oct 1990 A
4969041 O'Grady et al. Nov 1990 A
4972471 Gross et al. Nov 1990 A
4972503 Zurlinden Nov 1990 A
4979210 Nagata et al. Dec 1990 A
5057915 Von Kohorn Oct 1991 A
5073925 Nagata et al. Dec 1991 A
5080479 Rosenberg Jan 1992 A
5113437 Best et al. May 1992 A
5116437 Yamamoto et al. May 1992 A
5161251 Mankovitz Nov 1992 A
5191615 Aldava et al. Mar 1993 A
5200822 Bronfin et al. Apr 1993 A
5210820 Kenyon May 1993 A
5210831 Emma et al. May 1993 A
5213337 Sherman May 1993 A
5214792 Alwadish May 1993 A
5237611 Rasmussen et al. Aug 1993 A
5251041 Young et al. Oct 1993 A
5270480 Hikawa Dec 1993 A
5294962 Sato et al. Mar 1994 A
5294982 Salomon et al. Mar 1994 A
5319453 Copriviza et al. Jun 1994 A
5319735 Preuss et al. Jun 1994 A
5351304 Yamamoto Sep 1994 A
5379345 Greenberg Jan 1995 A
5402488 Karlock Mar 1995 A
5404160 Schober et al. Apr 1995 A
5404377 Moses Apr 1995 A
5408258 Kolessar Apr 1995 A
5414729 Fenton May 1995 A
5424785 Orphan Jun 1995 A
5425100 Thomas et al. Jun 1995 A
5432799 Shimpuku et al. Jul 1995 A
5436653 Ellis et al. Jul 1995 A
5450490 Jensen et al. Sep 1995 A
5452901 Nakada et al. Sep 1995 A
5473631 Moses Dec 1995 A
5481294 Thomas et al. Jan 1996 A
5497372 Nankoh et al. Mar 1996 A
5502576 Ramsay et al. Mar 1996 A
5504518 Ellis et al. Apr 1996 A
5508754 Orphan Apr 1996 A
5519454 Willis May 1996 A
5523794 Mankovitz et al. Jun 1996 A
5526427 Thomas et al. Jun 1996 A
5537484 Kobayashi Jul 1996 A
5579124 Aijala et al. Nov 1996 A
5581658 O'Hagan et al. Dec 1996 A
5581800 Fardeau et al. Dec 1996 A
5592553 Guski et al. Jan 1997 A
5612729 Ellis et al. Mar 1997 A
5613004 Cooperman et al. Mar 1997 A
5636292 Rhoads Jun 1997 A
5664018 Leighton Sep 1997 A
5687191 Lee et al. Nov 1997 A
5687236 Moskowitz et al. Nov 1997 A
5699427 Chow et al. Dec 1997 A
5719619 Hattori et al. Feb 1998 A
5719937 Warren et al. Feb 1998 A
5737329 Horiguchi Apr 1998 A
5752880 Gabai et al. May 1998 A
5761606 Wolzien Jun 1998 A
5764763 Jensen et al. Jun 1998 A
5778108 Coleman, Jr. Jul 1998 A
5787334 Fardeau et al. Jul 1998 A
5805635 Andrews, Jr. et al. Sep 1998 A
5809064 Fenton et al. Sep 1998 A
5809139 Girod et al. Sep 1998 A
5819289 Sanford, II et al. Oct 1998 A
5822360 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5822432 Moskowitz et al. Oct 1998 A
5825892 Braudaway et al. Oct 1998 A
5828325 Wolosewicz et al. Oct 1998 A
5832119 Rhoads Nov 1998 A
5841978 Rhoads Nov 1998 A
5848155 Cox Dec 1998 A
5850249 Massetti et al. Dec 1998 A
5850481 Rhoads Dec 1998 A
5862260 Rhoads Jan 1999 A
5870030 DeLuca et al. Feb 1999 A
5887243 Harvey et al. Mar 1999 A
5889868 Moskowitz et al. Mar 1999 A
5892900 Ginter et al. Apr 1999 A
5893067 Bender et al. Apr 1999 A
5901178 Lee et al. May 1999 A
5905800 Moskowitz et al. May 1999 A
5930369 Cox et al. Jul 1999 A
5933798 Linnartz Aug 1999 A
5937000 Lee et al. Aug 1999 A
5940124 Janko et al. Aug 1999 A
5940134 Wirtz Aug 1999 A
5940135 Petrovic et al. Aug 1999 A
5940429 Lam et al. Aug 1999 A
5943422 Van Wie et al. Aug 1999 A
5945932 Smith et al. Aug 1999 A
5949885 Leighton Sep 1999 A
5960081 Vynne et al. Sep 1999 A
5963909 Warren et al. Oct 1999 A
5986692 Logan et al. Nov 1999 A
6021432 Sizer, II et al. Feb 2000 A
6031914 Tewfik et al. Feb 2000 A
6035171 Takaya et al. Mar 2000 A
6035177 Moses et al. Mar 2000 A
6037984 Isnardi et al. Mar 2000 A
6044156 Honsinger et al. Mar 2000 A
6061793 Tewfik et al. May 2000 A
6067440 Diefes May 2000 A
6078664 Moskowitz et al. Jun 2000 A
6094228 Ciardullo et al. Jul 2000 A
6101310 Terada et al. Aug 2000 A
6128597 Kolluru et al. Oct 2000 A
6145081 Winograd et al. Nov 2000 A
6154571 Cox et al. Nov 2000 A
6160986 Gabai et al. Dec 2000 A
6173271 Goodman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175627 Petrovic et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189123 Anders Nystrom et al. Feb 2001 B1
6209092 Linnartz Mar 2001 B1
6209094 Levine et al. Mar 2001 B1
6222932 Rao et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229572 Ciardullo et al. May 2001 B1
6233347 Chen et al. May 2001 B1
6246775 Nakamura et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246802 Fujihara et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249870 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252972 Linnartz Jun 2001 B1
6253113 Lu Jun 2001 B1
6253189 Feezell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6268866 Shibata Jul 2001 B1
6278792 Cox et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282299 Tewfik et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285774 Schumann et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289108 Rhoads Sep 2001 B1
6290566 Gabai et al. Sep 2001 B1
6330335 Rhoads Dec 2001 B1
6330672 Shur Dec 2001 B1
6332031 Rhoads et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332194 Bloom et al. Dec 2001 B1
6353672 Rhoads Mar 2002 B1
6353974 Graf Mar 2002 B1
6363159 Rhoads Mar 2002 B1
6373974 Zeng Apr 2002 B2
6374036 Ryan et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381341 Rhoads Apr 2002 B1
6385330 Powell et al. May 2002 B1
6388712 Shinohara et al. May 2002 B1
6389152 Nakamura et al. May 2002 B2
6389538 Gruse et al. May 2002 B1
6400826 Chen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404781 Kawamae et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404898 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6411725 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6415040 Linnartz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6415041 Oami et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424726 Nakano et al. Jul 2002 B2
6427012 Petrovic Jul 2002 B1
6430301 Petrovic Aug 2002 B1
6449367 Van Wie et al. Sep 2002 B2
6449496 Beith et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473560 Linnartz et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477431 Kalker et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487301 Zhao Nov 2002 B1
6490355 Epstein Dec 2002 B1
6496591 Rhoads Dec 2002 B1
6505160 Levy et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510233 Nakano Jan 2003 B1
6510234 Cox et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512837 Ahmed Jan 2003 B1
6523113 Wehrenberg Feb 2003 B1
6529506 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2003 B1
6530021 Epstein et al. Mar 2003 B1
6550011 Sims, III Apr 2003 B1
6553127 Kurowski Apr 2003 B1
6556688 Ratnakar Apr 2003 B1
6557103 Boncelet, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570996 Linnartz May 2003 B1
6571144 Moses et al. May 2003 B1
6574350 Rhoads et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577744 Braudaway et al. Jun 2003 B1
6584138 Neubauer et al. Jun 2003 B1
6590996 Reed et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590997 Rhoads Jul 2003 B2
6591365 Cookson Jul 2003 B1
6592516 Lee Jul 2003 B2
6598162 Moskowitz Jul 2003 B1
6614914 Rhoads et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618484 Van Wie et al. Sep 2003 B1
6625297 Bradley Sep 2003 B1
6628729 Sorensen Sep 2003 B1
6633653 Hobson et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636615 Rhoads et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636967 Koyano Oct 2003 B1
6647128 Rhoads Nov 2003 B1
6647129 Rhoads Nov 2003 B2
6654501 Acharya et al. Nov 2003 B1
6661905 Chupp et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665419 Oami Dec 2003 B1
6668068 Hashimoto Dec 2003 B2
6671376 Koto et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671388 Op De Beeck et al. Dec 2003 B1
6674861 Xu et al. Jan 2004 B1
6674876 Hannigan et al. Jan 2004 B1
6675146 Rhoads Jan 2004 B2
6678389 Sun et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681029 Rhoads Jan 2004 B1
6683958 Petrovic Jan 2004 B2
6697944 Jones et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700990 Rhoads Mar 2004 B1
6704431 Ogawa et al. Mar 2004 B1
6707926 Macy et al. Mar 2004 B1
6721439 Levy et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728390 Rhoads et al. Apr 2004 B2
6737957 Petrovic et al. May 2004 B1
6738495 Rhoads et al. May 2004 B2
6744906 Rhoads et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748360 Pitman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6751337 Tewfik et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757908 Vogel Jun 2004 B1
6768807 Muratani Jul 2004 B1
6771797 Ahmed Aug 2004 B2
6785399 Fujihara Aug 2004 B2
6785401 Walker et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785815 Serret-Avila et al. Aug 2004 B1
6792542 Lee et al. Sep 2004 B1
6798893 Tanaka Sep 2004 B1
6801999 Venkatesan et al. Oct 2004 B1
6823455 Macy et al. Nov 2004 B1
6829368 Meyer et al. Dec 2004 B2
6829582 Barsness Dec 2004 B1
6834344 Aggarwal et al. Dec 2004 B1
6834345 Bloom et al. Dec 2004 B2
6850555 Barclay Feb 2005 B1
6850626 Rhoads et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856693 Miller Feb 2005 B2
6871180 Neuhauser et al. Mar 2005 B1
6880082 Ohta Apr 2005 B2
6888943 Lam et al. May 2005 B1
6891958 Kirovski et al. May 2005 B2
6912010 Baker et al. Jun 2005 B2
6912294 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B2
6912315 Wong et al. Jun 2005 B1
6915002 Gustafson Jul 2005 B2
6915422 Nakamura Jul 2005 B1
6915481 Tewfik et al. Jul 2005 B1
6928233 Walker et al. Aug 2005 B1
6931536 Hollar Aug 2005 B2
6944313 Donescu Sep 2005 B1
6944771 Epstein Sep 2005 B2
6947893 Iwaki et al. Sep 2005 B1
6952774 Kirovski et al. Oct 2005 B1
6954541 Fan et al. Oct 2005 B2
6961854 Serret-Avila et al. Nov 2005 B2
6973195 Matsui Dec 2005 B1
6993154 Brunk Jan 2006 B2
6996249 Miller et al. Feb 2006 B2
7007166 Moskowitz et al. Feb 2006 B1
7020304 Alattar et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024018 Petrovic Apr 2006 B2
7043049 Kuzma May 2006 B2
7043536 Philyaw et al. May 2006 B1
7043638 McGrath et al. May 2006 B2
7046808 Metois et al. May 2006 B1
7054461 Zeller et al. May 2006 B2
7054462 Rhoads et al. May 2006 B2
7058809 White et al. Jun 2006 B2
7058815 Morin Jun 2006 B2
7068809 Stach Jun 2006 B2
7072492 Ogawa et al. Jul 2006 B2
7103678 Asai et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107452 Serret-Avila et al. Sep 2006 B2
7111169 Ripley et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113613 Echizen et al. Sep 2006 B2
7142691 Levy Nov 2006 B2
7162642 Schumann et al. Jan 2007 B2
7164778 Nakamura et al. Jan 2007 B1
7167599 Diehl Jan 2007 B1
7171020 Rhoads et al. Jan 2007 B2
7177429 Moskowitz et al. Feb 2007 B2
7197368 Kirovski et al. Mar 2007 B2
7206649 Kirovski et al. Apr 2007 B2
7224819 Levy et al. May 2007 B2
7231061 Bradley Jun 2007 B2
7289643 Brunk et al. Oct 2007 B2
7298865 Lubin et al. Nov 2007 B2
7319759 Peinado et al. Jan 2008 B1
7321666 Kunisa Jan 2008 B2
7334247 Finseth et al. Feb 2008 B1
7336802 Kunisa Feb 2008 B2
7346514 Herre et al. Mar 2008 B2
7369677 Petrovic et al. May 2008 B2
7389421 Kirovski et al. Jun 2008 B2
7430670 Horning et al. Sep 2008 B1
7450727 Griesinger Nov 2008 B2
7454019 Williams Nov 2008 B2
7562392 Rhoads et al. Jul 2009 B1
7581103 Home et al. Aug 2009 B2
7587601 Levy et al. Sep 2009 B2
7616776 Petrovic et al. Nov 2009 B2
7617509 Brunheroto et al. Nov 2009 B1
7630497 Lotspiech et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644282 Petrovic et al. Jan 2010 B2
7660991 Nakamura et al. Feb 2010 B2
7664332 Wong et al. Feb 2010 B2
7693297 Zhang et al. Apr 2010 B2
7698570 Schumann et al. Apr 2010 B2
7788684 Petrovic et al. Aug 2010 B2
7788693 Robbins Aug 2010 B2
7818763 Sie et al. Oct 2010 B2
7840006 Ogawa et al. Nov 2010 B2
7979881 Wong et al. Jul 2011 B1
7983922 Neusinger et al. Jul 2011 B2
7986806 Rhoads Jul 2011 B2
7991995 Rabin et al. Aug 2011 B2
8055013 Levy et al. Nov 2011 B2
8059815 Lofgren et al. Nov 2011 B2
8155463 Wong et al. Apr 2012 B2
8189861 Rucklidge May 2012 B1
8194803 Baum et al. Jun 2012 B2
8249992 Harkness et al. Aug 2012 B2
8346532 Chakra et al. Jan 2013 B2
8467717 Croy et al. Jun 2013 B2
8589969 Falcon Nov 2013 B2
20010001159 Ford May 2001 A1
20010021926 Schneck et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010022786 King et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010044899 Levy Nov 2001 A1
20010051996 Cooper et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010054146 Carro et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007403 Echizen et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012443 Rhoads et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020033844 Levy et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044659 Ohta Apr 2002 A1
20020052885 Levy May 2002 A1
20020053026 Hashimoto May 2002 A1
20020054089 Nicholas et al. May 2002 A1
20020068987 Hars Jun 2002 A1
20020080964 Stone et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080976 Schreer Jun 2002 A1
20020082731 Pitman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095577 Nakamura et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020097873 Petrovic Jul 2002 A1
20020120849 McKinley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120854 LeVine et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020126842 Hollar Sep 2002 A1
20020126872 Brunk et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138734 David et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020154144 Lofgren et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168087 Petrovic Nov 2002 A1
20020178368 Yin et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020199106 Hayashi Dec 2002 A1
20030009671 Yacobi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030012098 Sako et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030012403 Rhoads et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030016825 Jones Jan 2003 A1
20030021439 Lubin et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021441 Levy et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028796 Roberts et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030031317 Epstein Feb 2003 A1
20030033321 Schrempp et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037075 Hannigan et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030053655 Barone et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056213 McFaddin et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061489 Pelly et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030063747 Petrovic Apr 2003 A1
20030072468 Brunk et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076955 Alve et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078891 Capitant Apr 2003 A1
20030081809 Fridrich et al. May 2003 A1
20030112974 Levy Jun 2003 A1
20030112997 Ahmed Jun 2003 A1
20030115504 Holliman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030131350 Peiffer et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152225 Kunisa Aug 2003 A1
20030174862 Rhoads et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177359 Bradley Sep 2003 A1
20030179901 Tian et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185417 Alattar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187679 Odgers et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030188166 Pelly et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030190054 Troyansky et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030190055 Kalker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200438 Kirovski et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030223584 Bradley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005076 Hosaka et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040008864 Watson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040009763 Stone et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010692 Watson Jan 2004 A1
20040015400 Whymark Jan 2004 A1
20040025176 Franklin et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040028255 Miller Feb 2004 A1
20040042635 Epstein et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040042636 Oh Mar 2004 A1
20040073916 Petrovic et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078575 Morten et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088556 Weirauch May 2004 A1
20040091111 Levy et al. May 2004 A1
20040093202 Fischer et al. May 2004 A1
20040093523 Matsuzaki et al. May 2004 A1
20040098593 Muratani May 2004 A1
20040101160 Kunisa May 2004 A1
20040103293 Ryan May 2004 A1
20040111740 Seok et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133794 Kocher et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040136531 Asano et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151316 Petrovic Aug 2004 A1
20040169581 Petrovic et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174996 Tewfik et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040202324 Yamaguchi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204943 Kirovski et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040216157 Shain et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040250078 Stach et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040258274 Brundage et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050008190 Levy et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010779 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013462 Rhoads Jan 2005 A1
20050050332 Serret-Avila et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071669 Medvinsky et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050120220 Oostveen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144632 Mears et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154891 Skipper Jul 2005 A1
20050196051 Wong et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202781 Steelberg et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050242568 Long et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251683 Levy et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060005029 Petrovic et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060056653 Kunisa Mar 2006 A1
20060062426 Levy et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075424 Talstra et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060104477 Isogai et al. May 2006 A1
20060143018 Densham et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060227968 Chen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239501 Petrovic et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070003103 Lemma et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005500 Steeves et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070033146 Hollar Feb 2007 A1
20070039018 Saslow et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070100483 Kentish et al. May 2007 A1
20070143617 Farber et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150418 Ben-Menahem et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070168673 Van Der Veen et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070177761 Levy Aug 2007 A1
20070192261 Kelkar et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208711 Rhoads et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214049 Postrel Sep 2007 A1
20070223708 Villemoes et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080002854 Tehranchi et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080016360 Rodriguez et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031463 Davis Feb 2008 A1
20080209219 Rhein Aug 2008 A1
20080228733 Davis et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080273861 Yang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298632 Reed Dec 2008 A1
20080310629 Van Der Veen et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080310673 Petrovic et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313741 Alve et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090031134 Levy Jan 2009 A1
20090033617 Lindberg et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090158318 Levy Jun 2009 A1
20090172405 Shiomi et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175594 Ann et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177674 Yoshida Jul 2009 A1
20090262932 Petrovic Oct 2009 A1
20090319639 Gao et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326961 Petrovic et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100034513 Nakano et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100115267 Guo et al. May 2010 A1
20100121608 Tian et al. May 2010 A1
20100146286 Petrovic et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100159425 Hamlin Jun 2010 A1
20100162352 Haga et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100214307 Lee et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100226525 Levy et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228632 Rodriguez Sep 2010 A1
20100228857 Petrovic et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100287579 Petrovic et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287609 Gonzalez et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110016172 Shah Jan 2011 A1
20110068898 Petrovic et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110091066 Alattar Apr 2011 A1
20110103444 Baum et al. May 2011 A1
20110123063 Delp et al. May 2011 A1
20110173210 Ahn et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110202687 Glitsch et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110209191 Shah Aug 2011 A1
20110219229 Cholas et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225427 Wood et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110235908 Ke et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110286625 Petrovic et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110293090 Ayaki et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311056 Winograd Dec 2011 A1
20110320627 Landow et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120017091 Petrovic et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120026393 Petrovic et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120072729 Winograd et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120072730 Winograd et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120072731 Winograd et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120084870 Petrovic Apr 2012 A1
20120130719 Petrovic et al. May 2012 A1
20120203556 Villette et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120265735 McMillan et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120300977 Petrovic et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130007462 Petrovic et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130011006 Petrovic et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130031579 Klappert Jan 2013 A1
20130073065 Chen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130108101 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130114847 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130114848 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130117570 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130117571 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130129303 Lee et al. May 2013 A1
20130132727 Petrovic May 2013 A1
20130142382 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151855 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151856 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130152210 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130283402 Petrovic Oct 2013 A1
20130339029 Petrovic et al. Dec 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (94)
Number Date Country
2276638 Jan 2000 CA
282734 Sep 1988 EP
372601 Jun 1990 EP
581317 Feb 1994 EP
2166725 Mar 2010 EP
2260246 Apr 1993 GB
2292506 Feb 1996 GB
2363027 Dec 2001 GB
10-150548 Jun 1998 JP
11-086435 Mar 1999 JP
11-284516 Oct 1999 JP
11284516 Oct 1999 JP
11-346302 Dec 1999 JP
11346302 Dec 1999 JP
2000-069273 Mar 2000 JP
2000-174628 Jun 2000 JP
2000163870 Jun 2000 JP
2000174628 Jun 2000 JP
2001022366 Jan 2001 JP
2001-119555 Apr 2001 JP
2001-188549 Jul 2001 JP
2001-216763 Aug 2001 JP
2001-218006 Aug 2001 JP
2001245132 Sep 2001 JP
2001-312570 Nov 2001 JP
2001-527660 Dec 2001 JP
2002-010057 Jan 2002 JP
2002-024095 Jan 2002 JP
2002-027223 Jan 2002 JP
2002027223 Jan 2002 JP
2002-091465 Mar 2002 JP
2002091712 Mar 2002 JP
2002100116 Apr 2002 JP
2002125205 Apr 2002 JP
2002135557 May 2002 JP
2002-165191 Jun 2002 JP
2002176614 Jun 2002 JP
2002-519916 Jul 2002 JP
2002-232693 Aug 2002 JP
2002319924 Oct 2002 JP
2002354232 Dec 2002 JP
2003-008873 Jan 2003 JP
2003-039770 Feb 2003 JP
2003-091927 Mar 2003 JP
2003-230095 Aug 2003 JP
2003-244419 Aug 2003 JP
2003-283802 Oct 2003 JP
2003316556 Nov 2003 JP
2004-023786 Jan 2004 JP
2004023786 Jan 2004 JP
2004070606 Mar 2004 JP
2004-163855 Jun 2004 JP
2004-193843 Jul 2004 JP
2004194233 Jul 2004 JP
2004-328747 Nov 2004 JP
2004328747 Nov 2004 JP
2005051733 Feb 2005 JP
2005-094107 Apr 2005 JP
2005094107 Apr 2005 JP
2005525600 Aug 2005 JP
20080539669 Nov 2008 JP
20100272920 Dec 2010 JP
5283732 Jul 2013 JP
20100009384 Jan 2010 KR
94-10771 May 1994 WO
95-14289 May 1995 WO
97-09797 Mar 1997 WO
97-33391 Sep 1997 WO
98-53565 Nov 1998 WO
99-03340 Jan 1999 WO
99-39344 May 1999 WO
99-45706 Oct 1999 WO
99-62022 Dec 1999 WO
00-00969 Jan 2000 WO
0013136 Mar 2000 WO
0056059 Sep 2000 WO
01-54035 Jul 2001 WO
01-55889 Aug 2001 WO
0197128 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197128 Dec 2001 WO
02-23883 Mar 2002 WO
0219589 Mar 2002 WO
03-052598 Jun 2003 WO
2005017827 Feb 2005 WO
2005-027501 Mar 2005 WO
2005027501 Mar 2005 WO
2005038778 Apr 2005 WO
2006051043 May 2006 WO
2006116394 Nov 2006 WO
2010073236 Jul 2010 WO
2013067439 May 2013 WO
2013090462 Jun 2013 WO
2013090466 Jun 2013 WO
2013090467 Jun 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (112)
Entry
Epp et al., “Generalized Scattering Matrices for Unit Cell Characterization of Grid Amplifiers and Device De-Embedding”, IEEE vol. 2, Jun. 1995, pp. 1288-1291.
Cinea Icc., “Forensic Watermarking”, 2004. [http://www.cinea.com/whitepapers/forensic—watermarking.pdf] (9 pages).
RSA Laboratory, “Frequently Asked Questions About Today's Cryptography,” Version 4.1, May 2000, pp. 1; 20-33; 54-58; 74-75; 87-88; 101-102; 106-110 and 113-118.
Jacobsmeyer, Jay, “Introduction to Error-Control Coding,” Pericle Communications Company, 2004 (16 pages).
Schneier, Bruce. “Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C”, Second Edition, Wiley & Sons, 1995; pp. 189-211.
Lelewer, D.A. and Hirschberg, D.S., “Data Compression,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 1, Issue 3, Sep. 1987, (59 pages).
Lu, Chun-Shien et al., “Oblivious Cocktail Watermarking by Sparse Code Shrinkage: A Regional- and Global-Based Scheme”, ICIP, 2000 (vol. III: 13-16).
Mason, A., et al., “User Requirements for Watermarking in Broadcast Applications”, IEEE Conference Publication, International Broadcasting Convention (IBC 2000), Amsterdam, Sep. 8-12, 2000 (7 pages).
“Microsoft Response to CfP for Technology Solutions to Screen Digital Audio Content for LCM Acceptance,” Microsoft Corp., May 23, 1999.
Mintzer, et al., “An Invisible Watermarking Technique for Image Verification,” 1997, pp. 680-683.
Mintzer et al., “If one watermak is good, are more better?”, Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1999. ICASSP'99., Publication Date Mar. 15-19, 1999, vol. 4, on pp. 2067-2069.
Mobasseri. B.G .. et al. “Content Authentication and Tamper Detection in Digital Video”. Image Processing. 2000. Proceedings. 2000 International Conference. vol. 1.2000. p. 458-461.
Moulin, P., et al., “Detection-Theoretic Analysis of Desynchronization Attacks in Watermarking,” Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2002-24, Microsoft Research (Mar. 2002).
Muranoi, R., et al., “Video Retrieval Method using ShotID for Copyright Protection Systems,” Proc. SPIE vol. 3527: Multimedia Storage and Archiving Systems III, Nov. 1998, pp. 245-252.
Nikolaidis et al., Watermark Detection: Benchmarking Perspectives, 2002 IEEE Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME 2002).
Office action dated Jul. 21, 2011 in Japanese Application 2008-508985.
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 in European Application 03774648.4.
Park et al, “Robust and Fragile Watermarking Techniques for Documents Using Bidirectional Diagonal Profiles”, Information and Communications Security: Third International Conference, ICICS 2001, Xian, China, Nov. 13-16, 2001, pp. 483-494.
Perez-Gonzalez, et al., “Approaching the capacity limit in image watermarking a perspective on coding techniques for data hiding applications”, Signal Processing, vol. 81, No. 6, Jun. 2001, pp. 1215-1238 (24).
Petitcolas, F. A. P.., et al., “Attacks on Copyright Marking Systems” Second Workshop on Informa tion Hiding, vol. 1525 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 218-238, Apr. 1998.
Philips Research Liquid Audio Fraunhofer Institute, “Digital Audio Screening Technology for Phased Rollout,” v. 1.0, May 23, 1999.
Pytlak, John P. “Anti-Piracy Coding,” URL: http://www.tele.com/pipermail/tig/2003-November/003842.html; Nov. 13, 2003 (2 pages).
Shih et al., “Combinational, image watermarking in the spatial and frequency domains”, Pattern Recognition Society 36 pp. 969-975 (2002).
Solanki et ai, “Robust Image-Adaptive Data Hiding: Modeling, Source Coding, and Channel Coding”, 41st Allerton Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing, Oct. 2003.
Steinebach, M., et al., “StirMark Benchmark: Audio Watermarking Attacks”, Int. Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC 2001), Apr. 2-4, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 49-54, ISBN 0-7695-1062-0, 2001.
Tanaka, K. et al. “Secret transmission method of character data in motion picture communication”, SPIE vol. 1605, Visual Communications and Image Processing '91, Visual Communication. pp. 646-649, 1991.
TASK AC122—Copy Protection for Distribution Services, Jul. 1, 1997, Http://acad.bg/WISE/english/rd/partners/acts/areal/ac122-t.html.
Tsai, et al., “Wavelet packet and adaptive spatial transformation of watermark for digital image authentication”, IEEE, Image Processing, 2000, Proceedings. 2000 International Conference on, Publication Date: 2000, vol. 1, on pp. 450-453 vol. 1, abstract, p. 452, section 2, pp. 450-452, section 2.
Verance Corporation, “Confirmedia”, PowerPoint presentation made to National Association of Broadcasters; Apr. 24, 2001 (40 pages).
Xu, C., et al., “Applications of digital watermarking technology in audio signals”, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 805-812, Oct. 1999.
Yeung, et al., “An Invisible Watermarking Technique for Image Verification,” 1997, pp. 680-683.
Zhao, J., “Applying Digital Watermarking Techniques to Online Multimedia Commerce,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Imaging Science, Systems and Applications (CISSA'97), Jun./Jul. 1997, 7 pages.
Zhao, J., “A WWW Service to Embed and Prove Digital Copyright Watermarks,” Proc. European Conf. on Multimedia Applications, Services and Techniques (ECMAST'96), May 1996, pp. 695-710.
Adelsbach, A., et al., “Proving Ownership of Digital Content,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, LNCS vol. 1768, Sep./Oct. 1999, pp. 117,133.
Advanced Access Content System (AACS), Pre-recorded Video Book, Revision 0.951, Sep. 28, 2009, 88 pages total.
Aggarwal, et al., “Multi-Layer Grid Embeddings,” IEEE, 1985, pp. 186-196.
“Audio Watermarking System to Screen Digital Audio Content for LCM Acceptance,” Aris Technologies, Inc., May 23, 1999.
Barreto, et al. “Toward Secure Public-Key Blockwise Fragile Authentication Watermarking”, IEEE Proceedings—Vision, Image, and Signal Processing—Apr. 2002, vol. 149, Issue 2, p. 57-62.
Boney, L., et al., “Digital Watermarks for Audio Signals,” Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, Mar. 27, 1996.
Caronni, Germano,“Assuring Ownership Rights for Digital Images”, Proceedings of ‘reliable IT systems’ VIS 95, H.H. Bruggermann and W. Gerhardt-Hackl (Ed.), Vieweg Publishing Company, Germany, 1995.
Chen, B. and G.W. Wornell, “Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1423-1443, 2001.
Chou, J. et al., “A Robust Optimization Solution to the Data Hiding Problem using Distributed Source Coding Principles”, Pro. SPIE, vol. 3971, San Jose, CA (Jan. 2000) (10 pages).
Chou, J., et al., “A Robust Blind Watermarking Scheme based on Distributed Source Coding Principles”, ACM Multimedia 2000 Los Angeles, CA USA.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US98/09587 dated Aug. 14, 1998.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US01/26505 dated Feb. 14, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US03/31816 dated May 19, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/31267 dated Aug. 22, 2007.
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/015615 dated Jan. 4, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/25090 dated May 13, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/15410 dated May 29, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/16812 dated Sep. 26, 2008.
M. Costa, “Writing on Dirty Paper” IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, IT-29, No. 3, pp. 439-441 (May 1983) (3 pages).
Cox, I. J. and J. P. M. G. Linnartz, “Some General Methods for Tampering with Watermarks” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, No. 4, May 1998, pp. 587-593.
Coxford, A., et al., “Advanced Mathematics: A Preparation for Calculus, Second Edition,” 1978, pp. 35-46.
Davidson, M.F., “Music File Filter,” Sony Music, New York, May 23, 1999.
Das, et al., “Distributed Priority Queues on Hybercube Architectures,” IEEE, 1996, pp. 620-627.
Digimarc® Watermarking Guide, © 1999 Digimarc Corporation, 22 pages.
Dittmann, J., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for digital images,” Proc. SPIE vol. 3657: Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, Jan. 1999, pp. 171-182.
Dittmann, J., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for customer copy monitoring”, Proc. IEEE Seminar on Secure Images and Image Authentication, Apr. 2000, pp. 6/1-6/6.
European Search Report for European Application No. 03774648.4 dated Nov. 10, 2010.
Furon, T. and P. Duhamel, “An asymmetric watermarking method”, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 51, No. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 981-995.
Guth, H.J. et al., “Error- and Collusion-Secure Fingerprinting for Digital Data,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, LNCS vol. 1768, Sep./Oct. 1999, pp. 134-145.
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of MPEG-2 encoded video without decoding and re-coding,” Proc. SPIE vol. 3020: Multimedia Computing and Networking 97, Feb. 1997, pp. 264-274.
Hartung, F., et al., “Digital Watermarking of MPEG-2 Coded Video in the Bitstream Domain,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Apr. 1997, pp. 2621-2624.
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of uncompressed and compressed video,” Signal Processing, vol. 66, May 1998, pp. 283-301.
Heegard, C. et al., “On the Capacity of Computer Memory with Defects”, IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. IT-29, No. 5, pp. 731-739 (Sep. 1983) (9 pages).
http://www.cryptography.com/technology/spdc/index.html.
Kalker, T., “A security risk for publicly available watermark detectors”, Proc. Benelux Info. Theory Symp., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 1998.
Kalker T., “System Issues in Digital Image and Video Watermarking for Copy Protection,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Jun. 1999, pp. 562-567.
Kang et al, “A DWT-DFT Composite Watermarking Scheme Robust to 80th Affine Transform and JPEG Compression”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 8, Aug. 2003.
Kim, T.Y., et al. “An Asymmetric Watermarking System With Many Embedding Watermarks Corresponding to One Detection Watermark”, IEEE signal processing letters, vol. 11, No. 3, Mar. 2004.
Kirovski et al., “Multimedia Content Screening using a Dual Watermarking and Fingerprinting System”, Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference, pp. 372-381, 2002.
D. Kirovski and F.A.P. Petitcolas, “The blind pattern matching attack on watermark systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, Apr. 2003.
Kirovski et al., “Randomizing the replacement attack”, ICASSP, 2004, pp. 381-384.
Kirovski, et al., “Multimedia Content Screening using a Dual Watermarking and Fingerprinting System”, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2001-57, Microsoft Research Jun. 2001).
Kocher, P. et al., “Self-Protecting Digital Content: A Technical Report from the CRI Content Security Research Initiative,” Cryptography Research, Inc. (CRI), 2002-2003 pp. 1-14.
Kutter, et al., “The watermark copy attack”, Proc. of the SPIE: Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Content II, vol. 3971, Jan. 2000.
Kuznetsov, A.V. et al., An Error Correcting Scheme for Defective Memory, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 712-718 (Nov. 1978) (7 pages).
Lacy, C., et al., “Intellectual Property Protection Systems and Digital Watermarking,” Proceedings: Information Hiding, Second International Workshop, Portland, OR, pp. 158-168, 1998.
Lin et al., “Detection of image alterations using semi-fragile watermarks”, Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents II, vol. 3971, USA, Jan. 2000 (12 pages).
Lin, P.L., “Robust transparent image watermarking system with spatial mechanisms,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 50, Feb. 2000, pp. 107-116.
Lotspeich, J., “The Advanced Access Content System's Use of Digital Watermarking,” MCPS '06, Oct. 28, 2006, pp. 19-21.
“Advanced Access Content System (AACS), Pre-recorded Video Book,” Revision 0.951, Sep. 2009 (86 pages).
“Civolution's 2nd screen synchronisation solution wins CSI product of the year 2011 award at IBC,” IBC Press Release, Hall 2—Stand C30, Sep. 2011 (2 pages).
“Content Protection—Self Protecting Digital Content,” http://www.cryptography.com/technology/spdc/index.html, May 2010 (1 page).
“Red Bee and Civolution develop companion app for FX UK,” http://www.digitaltveurope.net/19981/red-bee-and-civolution-develop-companion-app-for-fx-uk, Jan. 2012 (2 pages).
Bangaleea, R., et al., “Performance improvement of spread spectrum spatial-domain watermarking scheme through diversity and attack characterisation,” IEEE Africon, pp. 293-298, 2002.
Cappellini, V., et al. “Robust Frame-based Watermarking for Digital Video,” Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Sep. 2001 (5 pages).
European Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 07836262.1 filed Jul. 25, 2007 (12 pages).
European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 12150742.0, filed Oct. 7, 2003 (5 pages).
European Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758537.2, filed Apr. 21, 2006 (6 pages).
European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758577.8, filed Apr. 25, 2006 (6 pages).
European Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06785709.4, filed Jun. 27, 2006 (5 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069306, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (12 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 25, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069302, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (22 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 24, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051857, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/066138, filed Nov. 20, 2012 (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 14, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069308, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051855, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/063431, filed Nov. 2, 2012 (10 pages).
Kirovski, D., et al., “Robust spread-spectrum audio watermarking,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 3:1345-1348, 2001.
Maehara, F., et al., “A proposal of multimedial home education terminal system based on flash-squeak OS,” Technical report of the institute of image information and television engineers, 28(43):21-24, Jul. 2004.
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (6 pages).
Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (8 pages).
Office Action dated May 8, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-522802 (4 pages).
Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114667 (8 pages).
Office Action dated May 1, 2013 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114667 (6 pages).
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114666 (8 pages).
Seok, J., et al., “A novel audio watermarking algorithm for copyright protection of digital audio,” ETRI Journal, 24 (3):181-189, Jun. 2002.
Spangler, T., “Social Science,” http://www.multichannel.com/content/social-science, Sep. 2011 (5 pages).
Wang, X., et al., “Robust correlation of encrypted attack traffic through stepping stones by manipulation of interpacket delays,” Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on computer communications security, Oct. 27-30, 2003, Washington D.C., USA.
Wolfgang, R., et al., “Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(7):1108-1126, Jul. 1999.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070110237 A1 May 2007 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60697515 Jul 2005 US