Encryption techniques are often utilized to protect multimedia content signals during their storage or transport from one location to the next. The encrypted content may be securely broadcast over the air, through the Internet, over cable networks, over wireless networks, distributed via storage media, or disseminated through other means with little concern about piracy of the content. The level of security of the encrypted content depends on, among other things, the strength of the encryption algorithm and the encryption key management and safekeeping.
Before describing the details of the present invention it is beneficial to review some common encryption algorithms and techniques. More detailed descriptions may be found in, for example, “Applied Cryptography” by B. Schneier (John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996; ISBN: 0-471-12845-7). One class of encryption algorithms, called Stream Ciphers, converts the unencrypted content into an encrypted ciphertext one bit at a time. In this case, the content (i.e., the plaintext) is treated as a stream of bits, pi, that are XORed with a stream of encryption key bits, ki, to produce the encrypted (i.e., ciphertext) bits, ci. Equation (1) describes this process mathematically:
ci=pi⊕ki Equation (1)
The encryption key bits, ki, are typically generated independently using key stream generators known in the art. At the decryption end, the encrypted stream is XORed with an identical key stream to produce the original content. The decryption operation is mathematically represented by Equation (2).
pi=(pi⊕ki)⊕ki Equation (2)
In another class of encryption algorithms, called Block Ciphers, the content is processed in blocks of fixed size. So for example, a digital content may first be parsed into blocks of 64 bits and then each 64-bit block may be encrypted according to the encryption algorithm. Some of the most widely used encryption algorithms such as DES and AES are block ciphers. Block ciphers may further operate in different modes. In particular, in Electronic Codebook (ECB) and Counter (CTR) modes of operation, each block is encrypted independently from other blocks in the content. In Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode, Output Feedback (OFB) mode and Cipher Feedback (CFB) mode, each encrypted block has a dependency on the neighboring ciphertext and/or plaintext blocks. Cryptographic algorithms may also be classified as symmetric or asymmetric algorithms. In symmetric algorithms the same key is used for encryption and decryption, whereas in asymmetric algorithms different keys, and possibly different algorithmic steps, are used for encryption and decryption of the content.
While access to an encrypted content may be limited to entities with proper authorization and decryption keys, once a content is decrypted, it may be readily copied and disseminated. This is particularly true for multimedia content that must inevitably be converted to audio and/or visual signals (e.g., analog format) in order to reach an audience. Watermarks are particularly well suited to plug this so-called ‘analog hole’. Digital watermarking is typically referred to as the insertion of auxiliary information bits into a host signal without producing perceptible artifacts. Watermark bits embedded into a host signal are designed to be imperceptible, robust to common content transformations, and resistant to intentional attacks that are targeted to remove or alter the watermarks. The detection of watermarks as well as the extraction of information carried in the watermarks may be used to trigger a variety of actions and enable a myriad of applications. Some of these applications include copy control, broadcast monitoring, rights management, authentication and integrity verification, forensic tracking and covert communication. Numerous watermarking algorithms and applications are described in the prior art.
Due to the complimentary roles of digital watermarking and encryption in the safekeeping and management of content, both techniques are often used to protect and manage content of significant value such as audio, video, still images, text, programming data and other information in digital or analog formats. In an example workflow of content preparation and distribution, a content may be first embedded with digital watermarks; then it may optionally be compressed (to save storage space and/or transmission bandwidth) and finally, it may be encrypted prior to being transmitted or stored outside of a secure environment. Note, that in some applications, the insertion of watermarks may alternatively, or additionally, take place after the compression of the content but prior to the encryption. In some applications, however, it may be advantageous to insert digital watermarks directly into an encrypted data stream (without first decrypting the content). For example, in a forensic tracking application, a digital movie, after appropriate post production processing, may be encrypted at the movie studio or post production house, and sent out for distribution to movie theatres, to on-line retailers, or directly to the consumer. In such applications, it is often desired to insert forensic or transactional watermarks into the movie content to identify each entity or node in the distribution channel, including the purchasers of the content, the various distributors of the content, the presentation venue and the time/date/location of each presentation or purchase. Since a multiplicity of purchase/presentation requests may be received at any given time, it is also desired to insert the watermarks expeditiously and efficiently into the content without introducing significant delays in the processing and transmission of the requested content.
One way to achieve this goal would be to, at each desired node of the distribution channel, decrypt and possibly decompress the content, insert the appropriate watermarks and then re-compress and re-encrypt the embedded content. This procedure not only requires the knowledge of the encryption/decryption algorithms as well as the presence of encryption/decryption keys at each distribution node, but is also likely to introduce significant delays in the processing of the content. While it may be possible to securely communicate the encryption/decryption keys to theses nodes and produce a secure environment for the encryption/decryption to take place, this task would require additional system design, network security operations and key management protocols which may affect the operational cost and overall security of the distribution system.
It would be advantageous to provide methods, apparatus, and systems for digital watermarking that overcome various deficiencies of the prior art by providing the capability of watermark insertion into an encrypted content signal. In particular, it would be advantageous to provide methods, apparatus, and systems for the insertion of watermarks into an encrypted digital content that do not require the decryption and subsequent re-encryption of the digital content. It would also be advantageous to allow secure insertion of digital watermarks at any point in the transmission, storage or distribution of an encrypted digital content, without the need to decrypt (and further re-encrypt) the encrypted digital host content signal, and without requiring the knowledge of the encryption/decryption keys. It would be further advantageous if such embedded watermarks were adapted to persist throughout the content after it has undergone decryption. It would be still further advantageous to enable the insertion of digital watermarks into an encrypted host content that is in a compressed format and in such a way that the embedded watermarks persist throughout the content even after decryption and decompression of the host content signal. It would be advantageous if such techniques were applicable to a host content that has been encrypted using a variety of different encryption techniques, including stream ciphers, block cipher, symmetric and asymmetric encryption algorithms.
The methods, apparatus, and systems of the present invention provide the foregoing and other advantages.
The present invention provides methods, apparatus, and systems for the insertion of watermarks into an encrypted digital content that do not require decryption and subsequent re-encryption of the content.
In one example embodiment of the present invention, a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content signal is provided. A first version of a host content signal embedded with a first logical value is encrypted to produce a first encrypted signal. A second version of the host content signal embedded with a second logical value is encrypted to produce a second encrypted signal. A first set of segments from the first encrypted signal is combined with a second set of segments from the second encrypted signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.
The first and second encrypted signals may be in a compressed format. In particular, the two versions of the host content signals embedded with respective first and second logical values may be in a compressed format prior to encryption. Alternatively, they may be compressed after encryption and before transmission to a client device or user location.
The combining of the segments from the encrypted signals may be performed without the use of the encryption or decryption keys.
The embedded auxiliary information may persist throughout the host content after decryption of the composite encrypted host content.
The encrypting of the first and second versions of the host content signal may occur at a pre-processing center and the combining may occur at a user location.
A further example embodiment of the present invention provides a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content signal. A first version of an original host content signal embedded with a first logical value is encrypted to produce a first encrypted signal. A second signal comprising information corresponding to the first logical value and a second logical value embedded in the host content signal is produced. A first set of segments from the first encrypted signal is combined with a second set of segments from the second signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.
The method may further include at least one of compressing, encrypting, and scrambling the second signal.
The host content signal may be in a compressed format. For example, the encrypting may comprise encrypting of the compressed host content signal embedded with a first logical value. Further, the second signal may comprise information corresponding to the first and second logical values embedded in the compressed host content signal.
A further example embodiment of a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in an encrypted host content signal in accordance with the present invention is provided. The host content signal is encrypted to produce an unmarked encrypted host content signal. A first signal is produced which comprises information corresponding to a first logical value embedded in the host content signal. A second signal is produced comprising information corresponding to a second logical value embedded in the host content signal. A first set of segments is selected from the first signal and a second set of segments are selected from the second signal. The first set and the second set of segments are combined with the unmarked encrypted host content in a predefined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.
The method may further include at least one of compressing, encrypting, and scrambling the first or second signal.
The host content signal may be in compressed format. In such an embodiment, the encrypting may comprise encrypting of the compressed host content signal. Similarly, the first and second signals may comprise information corresponding to first and second logical values embedded in the compressed host content signal, respectively.
The first and second signals may be transmitted to a user premises, and combined with the unmarked encrypted host content signal that resides at the user premises.
In a further example embodiment of the present invention, a method for embedding auxiliary information symbols in a compressed and encrypted host content signal is provided. A first version of a compressed host content signal embedded with a first logical value is encrypted to produce a first encrypted signal. A second signal is produced which comprises information corresponding to the first logical value and a second logical value embedded in the compressed host content signal. A first set of segments from the first encrypted signal is combined with a second set of segments from the second signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host content with embedded auxiliary information.
The first encrypted signal and the second signal may comprise a matching signal interval. The combining may occur within the matching signal interval.
The first encrypted signal may comprise a partially encrypted signal.
Additional meta data corresponding to the first encrypted signal and the second signal are produced to facilitate the combining of the segments.
An example embodiment of the present invention also includes a further method for embedding auxiliary information into an encrypted host signal. In this embodiment, a first signal comprising an encrypted first version of a host signal is received, for example at a client device or user location. A second signal comprising information related to a first and a second logical values embedded in a second version of the host signal is also received. At least portions of the second signal are then combined with the first signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host signal with embedded auxiliary information.
An additional method for embedding auxiliary information into an encrypted host signal in accordance with an example embodiment the present invention is also provided. In this embodiment, an information signal corresponding to first and second logical values embedded into a first version of the host signal is received (e.g., at a client device or user location) from a pre-processing center. This information signal may then be combined with an encrypted second version of the host signal in a pre-defined manner to produce a composite encrypted host signal with embedded auxiliary information. This encrypted version of the host signal may already be present at the client device or user location, or received thereat simultaneously with the information signal.
In any of the foregoing example embodiments, the encrypted signal may be encrypted in accordance with at least one of a stream cipher, a block cipher, a symmetric encryption algorithm, an asymmetric encryption algorithm, or the like. Further, the pre-defined manner of the combining of the segments may identify an entity or a transaction. In addition, the host content signal may comprise at least one of audio, video, text, and programming information.
The present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawing figures, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:
The ensuing detailed description provides exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention. Rather, the ensuing detailed description of the exemplary embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing an embodiment of the invention. It should be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Several techniques for the insertion of forensic or transactional watermarks have been previously described in the literature. Some of these techniques take advantage of the fact that computationally expensive operations of the embedding process may be carried out separately, at a pre-processing center, prior to the embedding of watermarks. Once a request for the delivery of a content is received, the pre-processed versions of the content signal may be combined, without requiring computationally expensive operations, to produce a content with embedded watermarks. For example, in accordance with commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,912,315, adding forensic or transactional watermarks may be accomplished by pre-processing an original content with two or more different logical values to produce two or more embedded content signals. The two or more embedded content signals may then be transmitted to the ‘client’ (e.g., to an on-line distribution center or to a user premises), where the appropriate portions of the pre-processed signals are selected and assembled together to form an embedded content with a desired watermark value. Other variations and improvements to this technique are disclosed in commonly owned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/124,465. These improvements produce a versatile watermarking system that requires a smaller bandwidth for the transmission and storage of reduced-scale signals that enable the insertion of forensic marks. The term reduced-scale signal (as opposed to full-scale signal) is used to refer to any signal with a smaller information content than the original content. For example, such signals may have a smaller duration, dynamic range, bandwidth and/or spatial resolution than the original content.
Alternatively, as disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,301, each of two pre-processed versions of the content comprises two separate regions. The first region, called the Matching Signal Interval (MSI), either contains no watermark value or is embedded identically with the same watermark value in both pre-processed versions of the content (this is referred to as the region with ‘common watermark’). The second region, which is time interleaved with the first region, is embedded with a first or a second logical value, in the first or second pre-processed versions of the content, respectively. Transactional watermarking may be implemented by assembling proper portions of the first version of the content with proper portions of the second version of the content to produce an embedded content. The cutting and splicing of the two versions all occur within the MSI regions, where two signals are identical.
The various embodiments of the present invention enable the insertion of watermarks, such as the ones produced by the aforementioned watermarking systems, into an encrypted data stream. The disclosed methods and systems are applicable to systems that utilize stream ciphers, block ciphers, and symmetric or asymmetric encryption algorithms. In accordance with further embodiments of the present invention, such watermarks may be embedded into “compressed-and-encrypted” data signals. This is accomplished without requiring the content to be decrypted or decompressed, and without any knowledge of the encryption or decryption keys. Although most of the example embodiments of the present invention are described by illustrative examples that involve the embedding of binary watermark values, it should be understood that these techniques are readily extended to include the embedding of non-binary data symbols or embedding of multiple layers of watermarks (e.g., such as disclosed in the commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,912,315, and commonly owned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/124,465) that can be embedded and extracted independently from one another.
Stream Ciphers:
The particular methodology used to achieve the various goals of the present invention depends on the type of encryption algorithm and other configuration parameters of the media delivery and preparation system. The following describes the insertion of watermarks in example embodiments of a system that utilizes stream ciphers.
Case 0: This is the default case, where the original content signal, and/or a set of signals containing embedded logical values, is encrypted and transmitted to the target destination in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention. The received signals are then decrypted and appropriately cut-and-spliced, in accordance with any one of the above-described prior art transactional watermarking techniques, to produce a content signal with a desired watermark value. The embedded content may then be optionally re-encrypted and transmitted to the next destination. The re-encryption is typically not necessary if the content watermarking and subsequent transmission are conducted all within a secure environment. This technique is equally applicable to all types of encryption algorithms and different variations of forensic/transactional watermarking since the watermark is applied to the plaintext signal.
Case 1: In this example, illustrated in
Each full-scale version Oi,1, Oi,2 is then encrypted and transmitted to the client. This operation may be better understood by examining the following equations. The first full-scale encrypted stream, which is embedded with a first logical value, may be represented by:
ci,1=Oi,1⊕ki, Equation (3),
where, i represents the bit position within the stream of bits in the first version of the full-scale signal, Oi,1 represents the unencrypted version of the first full-scale signal at position i, and ci,1 represents the encrypted version of the first full-scale signal at position i. The second full-scale encrypted stream, which is embedded with a second logical value, may be similarly represented by:
ci,2=Oi,2⊕ki Equation (4),
where, Oi,2 represents the unencrypted version of the second full-scale signal at position i, and ci,2 represents the encrypted version of the second full-scale signal at position i. The encryption process occurs on a bit-by-bit basis and may comprise XORing each version with key bit stream, ki at XOR operators 106 and 108, respectively, to produce the two full scale encrypted streams Oi,1⊕ki and Oi,2⊕ki. The encryption of the two versions Oi,1, Oi,2 must occur independently from one another, but synchronously with the same encryption key stream ki. The two full scale encrypted streams Oi,1⊕ki and Oi,2⊕ki may then be transmitted over transmission channel 116 to the client side (user location or user device). At the client side, the desired portions of one stream (e.g., stream Oi,1⊕ki,) may be combined (on a bit-by-bit basis) with the desired portions of the other stream (e.g., Oi,2⊕ki) in accordance with a control signal 118 to produce a composite encrypted stream 120 with embedded watermarks.
Since the two versions are encrypted synchronously with the same key bit stream, ki, the bits of one encrypted stream Oi,1⊕ki may replace the corresponding bits of the other stream Oi,2⊕ki to form a composite data stream (watermarked signal 120). The composite signal 120 maintains its encryption and may be fully decrypted using the same encryption key stream, ki.
In
The transmission channel 116 shown in
Case 2A: In the example embodiment shown in
These optional operations at module 204 may be necessary to reduce the transmission bandwidth and to enhance the security of the transmitted signals. The information content of the generated signals, Oi,1⊕Oi and Oi,2⊕Oi, is typically substantially smaller than the original content signal since these signals are produced by XORing two substantially similar signals (recall that XOR operation produces a ‘1’ value only if the two operands are different). Thus the signals generated by XOR operations may comprise many zeroes, a property that makes them a good candidate for the application of lossless compression techniques. In other cases, where the embedded and original signals contain large differences (for example, as a result of applying watermark masking/concealment techniques during the embedding process), such compression techniques may not be as effective.
Upon the reception and appropriate decompression, descrambling or decryption at module 208, appropriate portions of the signals Oi,1⊕Oi and Oi,2⊕Oi may be XORed (e.g., at XOR operator 210) with the original encrypted content, Oi⊕ki, in accordance with the control signal 218A, producing a final composite encrypted watermarked signal 220, portions of which contain the first embedded watermark value (e.g., a logical “1”) and portions of which contain the second embedded watermark value (e.g., a logical “0”).
One of the features of the watermarking technique described in
Case 2B: The example embodiment shown in
One of the embedded content signals (i.e., the signal Oi,2 in the example embodiment of
The example watermarking technique described in connection with
Block Ciphers:
The above described watermark insertion techniques described in the context of stream ciphers may be readily adapted to operate with block encryption algorithms.
The insertion of watermarks into such block encrypted data streams can be done by adjusting a few watermark design parameters. One such adjustment would be to select the watermark bit durations to be an integer multiple of cipher block size. For example, an audio stream with 16-bit sample values and a block cipher size of 128 bits may be used. The watermarking system may be designed to embed a single watermark bit into 440 samples of the audio content (this corresponds to a watermark bit rate of approximately 100 bits per second for a 44.1 KHz audio signal). Thus 440×16=7040 bits of the host signal would be required for the embedding of each watermark bit. If the audio signal were encrypted in blocks of 128 bits, then 740/128=55 cipher blocks would be required to carry each watermark bit. An exemplary procedure would involve the embedding of the host signal with two different logical values to produce two embedded signals, wherein each embedded logical value spans 440 samples of the host signal. Each of the two embedded signals produced this way may then be grouped into 128-bit blocks, encrypted, and transmitted to the desired destination. The encryption must take place synchronously for both versions of the embedded content signal with the same encryption key.
The above technique may be modified to conform to other encryption block sizes, sampling rates or bit depth values. These modifications may produce different watermark bit rates in order to make the duration of each watermark bit an integer multiple of encryption block size. For example, if the bit depth of the incoming audio signal in the above example were to become 32 bits, a watermark bit rate of approximately 200 bits-per-second would be required to produce the same number of blocks per bit (i.e., 55, 128-bit encryption blocks per watermark bit). Alternatively, the number of blocks-per-watermark-bit may be changed from 55 to 110 to maintain the watermark bit rate at ˜100 bits-per-second while accommodating 32-bit audio sample values. Furthermore, the extension of the above described technique to other embedding configurations, such as the ones described in
Asymmetric and Public-Key Algorithms
The methods and systems of the various embodiments of the present invention can also be used in conjunction with asymmetric encryption algorithms. These algorithms use different keys for encryption and decryption of the content and may involve different algorithmic operations for encryption and decryption processes. It is important to note that the previously disclosed analysis did not require any references or knowledge of decryption keys or decryption algorithms. Thus, these systems and methods may be readily adapted to operate with asymmetric algorithms, as well. In addition, some asymmetric algorithms require modular arithmetic operations, including exponentiation; these operations and the necessary modifications to the watermark insertion techniques of the present invention will be discussed below.
RSA is one of the most widely used asymmetric encryption algorithms. RSA uses one key, called the public key, for encryption and another key, called the private key, for decryption of the content. The details of RSA encryption algorithm may be found in a many publications such as, B. Schneier's “Applied Cryptography”, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996; ISBN: 0-471-12845-7. The basic RSA encryption operation can be described by the following equation:
c=Ok[modulo n] Equation (5),
where c is the encrypted data, O is the original, unencrypted data, k is the encryption key, and n is an encryption parameter that is a product of two random prime numbers. In a public-key encryption algorithm, k and n are known public parameters. The decryption is carried out according to the Equation 6:
O=cd[modulo n] Equation (6),
where d is the private key and is only known to authorized parties. The encryption and decryption operations are carried out in modulo-n arithmetic. Modular arithmetic, and various hardware implementations thereof, is well known in the art and is described in many publications such as, David N. Amanor, “Efficient Hardware Architecture for Modular Manipulation”, Master's Thesis, Communications and Media Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Offenburg, Germany, February 2005. In order to encrypt a signal, the signal is typically broken up into smaller numerical blocks. The RSA (or similar asymmetric) encryption algorithm can be better illustrated by considering the following numerical example.
Let's assume O=688232678, n=3337, d=1019 and block size=3 digits. The original signal O may be broken up into blocks of 3 digits, namely:
It is also possible to apply the above techniques to produce systems that are analogous to the ones described in
While the above examples illustrated the application of the present invention to an RSA-like encryption algorithm, the presented techniques are equally applicable to other asymmetric encryption algorithms, including but not limited to, Pohlig-Hellman, Rabin, ElGamal as well as elliptical curve encryption algorithms.
Insertion of Watermarks into Compressed Domain
The above-described techniques for the insertion of forensic watermarks may be adapted to operate with an original content signal that is in a compressed format. For a majority of compression schemes, data signals are divided into blocks that are subsequently compressed using a variety of techniques. Examples of such compression algorithms include MPEG, JPEG, JPEG2000, AAC, AC3, and the like. What is important is for the particular compression technique to operate on blocks of signal content that can be independently compressed and decompressed. In MPEG compression, for example, a Group of Pictures (GOP) may be considered an independent compression block.
As shown in
Similarly, the embodiments shown in
In a block cipher environment, the operations of the forensic embedder may need further adjustments since two different block types are present: compression blocks and encryption blocks. The former often comprises a variable number of bits while the latter typically comprises a fixed number of bits. For example, in DES encryption algorithm, each block always comprises 64 bits of encrypted data, while a GOP block of compressed MPEG image data may contain any number of bits, depending on the particular nature of the motion picture frame sequence and the compression parameters. In such cases, it may not be possible to align the embedded bit boundaries, the compression block boundaries, and the encryption block boundaries all at the same time. In such cases, the general embedding technique may be modified in accordance with the technique described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,301 that was described earlier. Using this technique, embedded logical values may be separated by regions of the original content that are either A) not embedded at all, or B) are embedded with a common watermark in both versions of the embedded content.
Three design guidelines related to the selection of MSI blocks warrant further attention: 1) there must exist at least one splicing opportunity (splicing point 705) within each MSI block 706; 2) MSI boundaries must be aligned with compression block boundaries; and 3) a watermark bit must fit within a single compression block 703. The first design guideline can be guaranteed by creating MSI segments that are at least twice the size of encryption blocks 704. The second guideline requires each MSI to span one or more complete compression blocks 703. Both of these conditions can be easily satisfied since an MSI region may be selected to be the unmarked original content of an arbitrary length. As for the third guideline, in practical situations, each compression block 703 usually comprises several thousands of bits whereas a typical watermark bit only spans a few tens or hundreds of bits. Furthermore, in an unlikely case where a watermark bit can not fit in a single compression block 703, signal cutting and splicing can occur, for example, at every two compression block boundaries. It is however more likely that each watermark bit is embedded in only a portion of each compression block 703. This can occur, for example, in an MPEG-compressed signal where a watermark bit is embedded in an I-frame only, while the compression block 703 is a GOP, comprising several additional P and B frames. In such cases, the unmarked portions of the compression block 703 may simply be considered as extensions of the adjacent MSI regions 706.
Since the cutting and splicing of the two compressed and encrypted data streams must occur at the compression block boundaries, the boundary locations must be known at the client side. In some cases, it may be possible to preserve the format of the compressed data stream subsequent to encryption. For example, in an MPEG compressed video, only the data within each GOP may be encrypted while keeping some meta data and header information in unencrypted format. This way, while the actual image/audio data is encrypted, the compression block boundaries remain easily recognizable. Such partial encryption of the signal content, however, may weaken the security of the system. In systems where the entire signal content is encrypted, additional synchronization and compression block boundary information may need to be delivered to the client. This can be accomplished by transmitting this additional information together with, or separately from, the embedded content signals. Table 1 below shows an example of how such information may be generated for proper identification of compression blocks.
For example, according to Table 1, the first compression block starts at bit location 100 in both encrypted streams and ends at bit locations 5094 and 5090 in streams 1 and 2, respectively. Using the example technique of Table 1, non-data segments of the compressed data streams may be easily identified and avoided when the cut-and-splice watermarking is carried out.
Table 1 provides only an example embodiment of the present invention and it should be appreciated that there are many different ways of conveying the compression block boundaries. For example, boundary locations may be expressed in terms of encryption block numbers (instead of bit numbers) or they may be expressed in terms relative to other compression blocks. It is also possible to separately identify non-data fields (e.g., headers, metadata, etc.) or other fields of interest within a table similar to the one shown in Table 1. Furthermore, the above described methods may be modified to be used in conjunction with other watermarking techniques that insert digital watermarks into a compressed data stream. One such technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,687,191.
While specific examples were used in the foregoing disclosure to illustrate the embodiments of the present invention in association with one or more particular configurations of a watermarking system, it is understood that these techniques can be easily adapted to conform to alternate configurations of these watermarking systems. For example, in various embodiments of the present invention, such as those described in
It should now be appreciated that the present invention provides advantageous methods and apparatus for watermarking encrypted data streams.
Although the invention has been described in connection with various illustrated embodiments, numerous modifications and adaptations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application No. 60/697,515 filed on Jul. 7, 2005, which is incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference for all purposes as if set forth herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3406344 | Hopper | Oct 1968 | A |
3842196 | Loughlin | Oct 1974 | A |
3885217 | Cintron | May 1975 | A |
3894190 | Gassmann | Jul 1975 | A |
3919479 | Moon et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3973206 | Haselwood et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4048562 | Haselwood et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4176379 | Wessler et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4199788 | Tsujimura | Apr 1980 | A |
4225967 | Miwa et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4230990 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4281217 | Dolby | Jul 1981 | A |
4295128 | Hashemian et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4425578 | Haselwood et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4454610 | Sziklai | Jun 1984 | A |
4464656 | Nakamura | Aug 1984 | A |
4497060 | Yang | Jan 1985 | A |
4512013 | Nash et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4547804 | Greenberg | Oct 1985 | A |
4564862 | Cohen | Jan 1986 | A |
4593904 | Graves | Jun 1986 | A |
4639779 | Greenberg | Jan 1987 | A |
4669089 | Gahagan et al. | May 1987 | A |
4677466 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686707 | Iwasaki et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4703476 | Howard | Oct 1987 | A |
4706282 | Knowd | Nov 1987 | A |
4723302 | Fulmer et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729398 | Benson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4739398 | Thomas et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4750173 | Bluthgen | Jun 1988 | A |
4755871 | Morales-Garza et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4755884 | Efron et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4764608 | Masuzawa et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4764808 | Solar | Aug 1988 | A |
4789863 | Bush | Dec 1988 | A |
4805020 | Greenberg | Feb 1989 | A |
4807013 | Manocha | Feb 1989 | A |
4807031 | Broughton et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4840602 | Rose | Jun 1989 | A |
4843562 | Kenyon et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4876617 | Best et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4876736 | Kiewit | Oct 1989 | A |
4930011 | Kiewit | May 1990 | A |
4931871 | Kramer | Jun 1990 | A |
4937807 | Weitz et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939515 | Adelson | Jul 1990 | A |
4943963 | Waechter et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945412 | Kramer | Jul 1990 | A |
4967273 | Greenberg | Oct 1990 | A |
4969041 | O'Grady et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972471 | Gross et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972503 | Zurlinden | Nov 1990 | A |
4979210 | Nagata et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5057915 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1991 | A |
5073925 | Nagata et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080479 | Rosenberg | Jan 1992 | A |
5113437 | Best et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116437 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1992 | A |
5161251 | Mankovitz | Nov 1992 | A |
5191615 | Aldava et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200822 | Bronfin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210820 | Kenyon | May 1993 | A |
5210831 | Emma et al. | May 1993 | A |
5213337 | Sherman | May 1993 | A |
5214792 | Alwadish | May 1993 | A |
5237611 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251041 | Young et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5270480 | Hikawa | Dec 1993 | A |
5294962 | Sato et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294982 | Salomon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5319453 | Copriviza et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319735 | Preuss et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5351304 | Yamamoto | Sep 1994 | A |
5379345 | Greenberg | Jan 1995 | A |
5402488 | Karlock | Mar 1995 | A |
5404160 | Schober et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5404377 | Moses | Apr 1995 | A |
5408258 | Kolessar | Apr 1995 | A |
5414729 | Fenton | May 1995 | A |
5424785 | Orphan | Jun 1995 | A |
5425100 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432799 | Shimpuku et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436653 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5450490 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452901 | Nakada et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5473631 | Moses | Dec 1995 | A |
5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497372 | Nankoh et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502576 | Ramsay et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504518 | Ellis et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508754 | Orphan | Apr 1996 | A |
5519454 | Willis | May 1996 | A |
5523794 | Mankovitz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526427 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537484 | Kobayashi | Jul 1996 | A |
5579124 | Aijala et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581658 | O'Hagan et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5581800 | Fardeau et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592553 | Guski et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5612729 | Ellis et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613004 | Cooperman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636292 | Rhoads | Jun 1997 | A |
5664018 | Leighton | Sep 1997 | A |
5687191 | Lee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687236 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699427 | Chow et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719619 | Hattori et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719937 | Warren et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737329 | Horiguchi | Apr 1998 | A |
5752880 | Gabai et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761606 | Wolzien | Jun 1998 | A |
5764763 | Jensen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778108 | Coleman, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787334 | Fardeau et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805635 | Andrews, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809064 | Fenton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809139 | Girod et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819289 | Sanford, II et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822360 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822432 | Moskowitz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825892 | Braudaway et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828325 | Wolosewicz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832119 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5841978 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5848155 | Cox | Dec 1998 | A |
5850249 | Massetti et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850481 | Rhoads | Dec 1998 | A |
5862260 | Rhoads | Jan 1999 | A |
5870030 | DeLuca et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5887243 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889868 | Moskowitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893067 | Bender et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901178 | Lee et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905800 | Moskowitz et al. | May 1999 | A |
5930369 | Cox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933798 | Linnartz | Aug 1999 | A |
5937000 | Lee et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940124 | Janko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940134 | Wirtz | Aug 1999 | A |
5940135 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940429 | Lam et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943422 | Van Wie et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945932 | Smith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949885 | Leighton | Sep 1999 | A |
5960081 | Vynne et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963909 | Warren et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986692 | Logan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6021432 | Sizer, II et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031914 | Tewfik et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035171 | Takaya et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035177 | Moses et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037984 | Isnardi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044156 | Honsinger et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061793 | Tewfik et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067440 | Diefes | May 2000 | A |
6078664 | Moskowitz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094228 | Ciardullo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101310 | Terada et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128597 | Kolluru et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145081 | Winograd et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154571 | Cox et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160986 | Gabai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173271 | Goodman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175627 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189123 | Anders Nystrom et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209092 | Linnartz | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209094 | Levine et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222932 | Rao et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229572 | Ciardullo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233347 | Chen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246775 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246802 | Fujihara et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249870 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252972 | Linnartz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253113 | Lu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268866 | Shibata | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278792 | Cox et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282299 | Tewfik et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285774 | Schumann et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289108 | Rhoads | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290566 | Gabai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6330335 | Rhoads | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330672 | Shur | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332031 | Rhoads et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332194 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353672 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6353974 | Graf | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363159 | Rhoads | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373974 | Zeng | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374036 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381341 | Rhoads | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385330 | Powell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388712 | Shinohara et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389152 | Nakamura et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6389538 | Gruse et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400826 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404781 | Kawamae et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404898 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411725 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415040 | Linnartz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415041 | Oami et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424726 | Nakano et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6427012 | Petrovic | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430301 | Petrovic | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449367 | Van Wie et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6449496 | Beith et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473560 | Linnartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477431 | Kalker et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487301 | Zhao | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490355 | Epstein | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496591 | Rhoads | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505160 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510233 | Nakano | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510234 | Cox et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512837 | Ahmed | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523113 | Wehrenberg | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529506 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530021 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6550011 | Sims, III | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553127 | Kurowski | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556688 | Ratnakar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557103 | Boncelet, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570996 | Linnartz | May 2003 | B1 |
6571144 | Moses et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574350 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577744 | Braudaway et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584138 | Neubauer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590996 | Reed et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590997 | Rhoads | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591365 | Cookson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592516 | Lee | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598162 | Moskowitz | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614914 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618484 | Van Wie et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625297 | Bradley | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628729 | Sorensen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633653 | Hobson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636615 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636967 | Koyano | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647128 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647129 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654501 | Acharya et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661905 | Chupp et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665419 | Oami | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668068 | Hashimoto | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671376 | Koto et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671388 | Op De Beeck et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674861 | Xu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6674876 | Hannigan et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675146 | Rhoads | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678389 | Sun et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681029 | Rhoads | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683958 | Petrovic | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700990 | Rhoads | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704431 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707926 | Macy et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721439 | Levy et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728390 | Rhoads et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737957 | Petrovic et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738495 | Rhoads et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744906 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748360 | Pitman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751337 | Tewfik et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757908 | Vogel | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768807 | Muratani | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771797 | Ahmed | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785399 | Fujihara | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785401 | Walker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785815 | Serret-Avila et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792542 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798893 | Tanaka | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801999 | Venkatesan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823455 | Macy et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829368 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6829582 | Barsness | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834344 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834345 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850555 | Barclay | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6850626 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856693 | Miller | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871180 | Neuhauser et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880082 | Ohta | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888943 | Lam et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6891958 | Kirovski et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912010 | Baker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912294 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912315 | Wong et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6915002 | Gustafson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6915422 | Nakamura | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6915481 | Tewfik et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928233 | Walker et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931536 | Hollar | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944313 | Donescu | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944771 | Epstein | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947893 | Iwaki et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952774 | Kirovski et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6954541 | Fan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961854 | Serret-Avila et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973195 | Matsui | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993154 | Brunk | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996249 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007166 | Moskowitz et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7020304 | Alattar et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024018 | Petrovic | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043049 | Kuzma | May 2006 | B2 |
7043536 | Philyaw et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7043638 | McGrath et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046808 | Metois et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054461 | Zeller et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054462 | Rhoads et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058809 | White et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058815 | Morin | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068809 | Stach | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072492 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103678 | Asai et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107452 | Serret-Avila et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111169 | Ripley et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113613 | Echizen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7142691 | Levy | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162642 | Schumann et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164778 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167599 | Diehl | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171020 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177429 | Moskowitz et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197368 | Kirovski et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206649 | Kirovski et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224819 | Levy et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231061 | Bradley | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7289643 | Brunk et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298865 | Lubin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7319759 | Peinado et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7321666 | Kunisa | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334247 | Finseth et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7336802 | Kunisa | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346514 | Herre et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369677 | Petrovic et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7389421 | Kirovski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7430670 | Horning et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7450727 | Griesinger | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454019 | Williams | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7562392 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7581103 | Home et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587601 | Levy et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7616776 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617509 | Brunheroto et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630497 | Lotspiech et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644282 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660991 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664332 | Wong et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693297 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698570 | Schumann et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7788684 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788693 | Robbins | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818763 | Sie et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7840006 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7979881 | Wong et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7983922 | Neusinger et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986806 | Rhoads | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991995 | Rabin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8055013 | Levy et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8059815 | Lofgren et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8155463 | Wong et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8189861 | Rucklidge | May 2012 | B1 |
8194803 | Baum et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8249992 | Harkness et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8346532 | Chakra et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8467717 | Croy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8589969 | Falcon | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20010001159 | Ford | May 2001 | A1 |
20010021926 | Schneck et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010022786 | King et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010044899 | Levy | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054146 | Carro et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007403 | Echizen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012443 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020033844 | Levy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044659 | Ohta | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052885 | Levy | May 2002 | A1 |
20020053026 | Hashimoto | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054089 | Nicholas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068987 | Hars | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080964 | Stone et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080976 | Schreer | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082731 | Pitman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095577 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097873 | Petrovic | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120849 | McKinley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120854 | LeVine et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126842 | Hollar | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126872 | Brunk et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138734 | David et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154144 | Lofgren et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168087 | Petrovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178368 | Yin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020199106 | Hayashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009671 | Yacobi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012098 | Sako et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012403 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016825 | Jones | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021439 | Lubin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021441 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028796 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031317 | Epstein | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033321 | Schrempp et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037075 | Hannigan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053655 | Barone et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056213 | McFaddin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061489 | Pelly et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063747 | Petrovic | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072468 | Brunk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076955 | Alve et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078891 | Capitant | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081809 | Fridrich et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112974 | Levy | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112997 | Ahmed | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115504 | Holliman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131350 | Peiffer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152225 | Kunisa | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174862 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177359 | Bradley | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179901 | Tian et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185417 | Alattar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187679 | Odgers et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188166 | Pelly et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190054 | Troyansky et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190055 | Kalker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200438 | Kirovski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030223584 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005076 | Hosaka et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008864 | Watson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009763 | Stone et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010692 | Watson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015400 | Whymark | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025176 | Franklin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028255 | Miller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042635 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042636 | Oh | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073916 | Petrovic et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078575 | Morten et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088556 | Weirauch | May 2004 | A1 |
20040091111 | Levy et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093202 | Fischer et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093523 | Matsuzaki et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098593 | Muratani | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101160 | Kunisa | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103293 | Ryan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111740 | Seok et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133794 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136531 | Asano et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151316 | Petrovic | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169581 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174996 | Tewfik et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202324 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204943 | Kirovski et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216157 | Shain et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040250078 | Stach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258274 | Brundage et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008190 | Levy et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010779 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013462 | Rhoads | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050332 | Serret-Avila et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071669 | Medvinsky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050120220 | Oostveen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144632 | Mears et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154891 | Skipper | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196051 | Wong et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202781 | Steelberg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242568 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251683 | Levy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060005029 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056653 | Kunisa | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062426 | Levy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075424 | Talstra et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104477 | Isogai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060143018 | Densham et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060227968 | Chen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239501 | Petrovic et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070003103 | Lemma et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005500 | Steeves et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033146 | Hollar | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039018 | Saslow et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100483 | Kentish et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143617 | Farber et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150418 | Ben-Menahem et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168673 | Van Der Veen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177761 | Levy | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192261 | Kelkar et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208711 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214049 | Postrel | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223708 | Villemoes et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080002854 | Tehranchi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016360 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031463 | Davis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080209219 | Rhein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228733 | Davis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273861 | Yang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298632 | Reed | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310629 | Van Der Veen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310673 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313741 | Alve et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090031134 | Levy | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033617 | Lindberg et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090158318 | Levy | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172405 | Shiomi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175594 | Ann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177674 | Yoshida | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090262932 | Petrovic | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090319639 | Gao et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326961 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034513 | Nakano et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100115267 | Guo et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121608 | Tian et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100146286 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159425 | Hamlin | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162352 | Haga et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100214307 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226525 | Levy et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228632 | Rodriguez | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228857 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287579 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287609 | Gonzalez et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110016172 | Shah | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110068898 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091066 | Alattar | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103444 | Baum et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110123063 | Delp et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110173210 | Ahn et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202687 | Glitsch et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209191 | Shah | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219229 | Cholas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225427 | Wood et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235908 | Ke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110286625 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293090 | Ayaki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311056 | Winograd | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320627 | Landow et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017091 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026393 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072729 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072730 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072731 | Winograd et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084870 | Petrovic | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130719 | Petrovic et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120203556 | Villette et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265735 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120300977 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130007462 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011006 | Petrovic et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031579 | Klappert | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130073065 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108101 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114847 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114848 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117570 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117571 | Petrovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129303 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132727 | Petrovic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142382 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151855 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151856 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130152210 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130283402 | Petrovic | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130339029 | Petrovic et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2276638 | Jan 2000 | CA |
282734 | Sep 1988 | EP |
372601 | Jun 1990 | EP |
581317 | Feb 1994 | EP |
2166725 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2260246 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2292506 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2363027 | Dec 2001 | GB |
10-150548 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-086435 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-284516 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11284516 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-346302 | Dec 1999 | JP |
11346302 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-069273 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-174628 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000163870 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000174628 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001022366 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-119555 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-188549 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-216763 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-218006 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001245132 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-312570 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001-527660 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-010057 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-024095 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-027223 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002027223 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-091465 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002091712 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002100116 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002125205 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002135557 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-165191 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002176614 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-519916 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-232693 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002319924 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002354232 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-008873 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-039770 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-091927 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003-230095 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-244419 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-283802 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003316556 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-023786 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004023786 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004070606 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-163855 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-193843 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004194233 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-328747 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004328747 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005051733 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-094107 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005094107 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005525600 | Aug 2005 | JP |
20080539669 | Nov 2008 | JP |
20100272920 | Dec 2010 | JP |
5283732 | Jul 2013 | JP |
20100009384 | Jan 2010 | KR |
94-10771 | May 1994 | WO |
95-14289 | May 1995 | WO |
97-09797 | Mar 1997 | WO |
97-33391 | Sep 1997 | WO |
98-53565 | Nov 1998 | WO |
99-03340 | Jan 1999 | WO |
99-39344 | May 1999 | WO |
99-45706 | Oct 1999 | WO |
99-62022 | Dec 1999 | WO |
00-00969 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0013136 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0056059 | Sep 2000 | WO |
01-54035 | Jul 2001 | WO |
01-55889 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0197128 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0197128 | Dec 2001 | WO |
02-23883 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0219589 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03-052598 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005017827 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005-027501 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005027501 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005038778 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2006051043 | May 2006 | WO |
2006116394 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2010073236 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2013067439 | May 2013 | WO |
2013090462 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013090466 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013090467 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Epp et al., “Generalized Scattering Matrices for Unit Cell Characterization of Grid Amplifiers and Device De-Embedding”, IEEE vol. 2, Jun. 1995, pp. 1288-1291. |
Cinea Icc., “Forensic Watermarking”, 2004. [http://www.cinea.com/whitepapers/forensic—watermarking.pdf] (9 pages). |
RSA Laboratory, “Frequently Asked Questions About Today's Cryptography,” Version 4.1, May 2000, pp. 1; 20-33; 54-58; 74-75; 87-88; 101-102; 106-110 and 113-118. |
Jacobsmeyer, Jay, “Introduction to Error-Control Coding,” Pericle Communications Company, 2004 (16 pages). |
Schneier, Bruce. “Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C”, Second Edition, Wiley & Sons, 1995; pp. 189-211. |
Lelewer, D.A. and Hirschberg, D.S., “Data Compression,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 1, Issue 3, Sep. 1987, (59 pages). |
Lu, Chun-Shien et al., “Oblivious Cocktail Watermarking by Sparse Code Shrinkage: A Regional- and Global-Based Scheme”, ICIP, 2000 (vol. III: 13-16). |
Mason, A., et al., “User Requirements for Watermarking in Broadcast Applications”, IEEE Conference Publication, International Broadcasting Convention (IBC 2000), Amsterdam, Sep. 8-12, 2000 (7 pages). |
“Microsoft Response to CfP for Technology Solutions to Screen Digital Audio Content for LCM Acceptance,” Microsoft Corp., May 23, 1999. |
Mintzer, et al., “An Invisible Watermarking Technique for Image Verification,” 1997, pp. 680-683. |
Mintzer et al., “If one watermak is good, are more better?”, Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1999. ICASSP'99., Publication Date Mar. 15-19, 1999, vol. 4, on pp. 2067-2069. |
Mobasseri. B.G .. et al. “Content Authentication and Tamper Detection in Digital Video”. Image Processing. 2000. Proceedings. 2000 International Conference. vol. 1.2000. p. 458-461. |
Moulin, P., et al., “Detection-Theoretic Analysis of Desynchronization Attacks in Watermarking,” Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2002-24, Microsoft Research (Mar. 2002). |
Muranoi, R., et al., “Video Retrieval Method using ShotID for Copyright Protection Systems,” Proc. SPIE vol. 3527: Multimedia Storage and Archiving Systems III, Nov. 1998, pp. 245-252. |
Nikolaidis et al., Watermark Detection: Benchmarking Perspectives, 2002 IEEE Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME 2002). |
Office action dated Jul. 21, 2011 in Japanese Application 2008-508985. |
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 in European Application 03774648.4. |
Park et al, “Robust and Fragile Watermarking Techniques for Documents Using Bidirectional Diagonal Profiles”, Information and Communications Security: Third International Conference, ICICS 2001, Xian, China, Nov. 13-16, 2001, pp. 483-494. |
Perez-Gonzalez, et al., “Approaching the capacity limit in image watermarking a perspective on coding techniques for data hiding applications”, Signal Processing, vol. 81, No. 6, Jun. 2001, pp. 1215-1238 (24). |
Petitcolas, F. A. P.., et al., “Attacks on Copyright Marking Systems” Second Workshop on Informa tion Hiding, vol. 1525 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 218-238, Apr. 1998. |
Philips Research Liquid Audio Fraunhofer Institute, “Digital Audio Screening Technology for Phased Rollout,” v. 1.0, May 23, 1999. |
Pytlak, John P. “Anti-Piracy Coding,” URL: http://www.tele.com/pipermail/tig/2003-November/003842.html; Nov. 13, 2003 (2 pages). |
Shih et al., “Combinational, image watermarking in the spatial and frequency domains”, Pattern Recognition Society 36 pp. 969-975 (2002). |
Solanki et ai, “Robust Image-Adaptive Data Hiding: Modeling, Source Coding, and Channel Coding”, 41st Allerton Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing, Oct. 2003. |
Steinebach, M., et al., “StirMark Benchmark: Audio Watermarking Attacks”, Int. Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC 2001), Apr. 2-4, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 49-54, ISBN 0-7695-1062-0, 2001. |
Tanaka, K. et al. “Secret transmission method of character data in motion picture communication”, SPIE vol. 1605, Visual Communications and Image Processing '91, Visual Communication. pp. 646-649, 1991. |
TASK AC122—Copy Protection for Distribution Services, Jul. 1, 1997, Http://acad.bg/WISE/english/rd/partners/acts/areal/ac122-t.html. |
Tsai, et al., “Wavelet packet and adaptive spatial transformation of watermark for digital image authentication”, IEEE, Image Processing, 2000, Proceedings. 2000 International Conference on, Publication Date: 2000, vol. 1, on pp. 450-453 vol. 1, abstract, p. 452, section 2, pp. 450-452, section 2. |
Verance Corporation, “Confirmedia”, PowerPoint presentation made to National Association of Broadcasters; Apr. 24, 2001 (40 pages). |
Xu, C., et al., “Applications of digital watermarking technology in audio signals”, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 805-812, Oct. 1999. |
Yeung, et al., “An Invisible Watermarking Technique for Image Verification,” 1997, pp. 680-683. |
Zhao, J., “Applying Digital Watermarking Techniques to Online Multimedia Commerce,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Imaging Science, Systems and Applications (CISSA'97), Jun./Jul. 1997, 7 pages. |
Zhao, J., “A WWW Service to Embed and Prove Digital Copyright Watermarks,” Proc. European Conf. on Multimedia Applications, Services and Techniques (ECMAST'96), May 1996, pp. 695-710. |
Adelsbach, A., et al., “Proving Ownership of Digital Content,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, LNCS vol. 1768, Sep./Oct. 1999, pp. 117,133. |
Advanced Access Content System (AACS), Pre-recorded Video Book, Revision 0.951, Sep. 28, 2009, 88 pages total. |
Aggarwal, et al., “Multi-Layer Grid Embeddings,” IEEE, 1985, pp. 186-196. |
“Audio Watermarking System to Screen Digital Audio Content for LCM Acceptance,” Aris Technologies, Inc., May 23, 1999. |
Barreto, et al. “Toward Secure Public-Key Blockwise Fragile Authentication Watermarking”, IEEE Proceedings—Vision, Image, and Signal Processing—Apr. 2002, vol. 149, Issue 2, p. 57-62. |
Boney, L., et al., “Digital Watermarks for Audio Signals,” Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, Mar. 27, 1996. |
Caronni, Germano,“Assuring Ownership Rights for Digital Images”, Proceedings of ‘reliable IT systems’ VIS 95, H.H. Bruggermann and W. Gerhardt-Hackl (Ed.), Vieweg Publishing Company, Germany, 1995. |
Chen, B. and G.W. Wornell, “Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1423-1443, 2001. |
Chou, J. et al., “A Robust Optimization Solution to the Data Hiding Problem using Distributed Source Coding Principles”, Pro. SPIE, vol. 3971, San Jose, CA (Jan. 2000) (10 pages). |
Chou, J., et al., “A Robust Blind Watermarking Scheme based on Distributed Source Coding Principles”, ACM Multimedia 2000 Los Angeles, CA USA. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US98/09587 dated Aug. 14, 1998. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US01/26505 dated Feb. 14, 2002. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US03/31816 dated May 19, 2004. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/31267 dated Aug. 22, 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/015615 dated Jan. 4, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/25090 dated May 13, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/15410 dated May 29, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/16812 dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
M. Costa, “Writing on Dirty Paper” IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, IT-29, No. 3, pp. 439-441 (May 1983) (3 pages). |
Cox, I. J. and J. P. M. G. Linnartz, “Some General Methods for Tampering with Watermarks” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, No. 4, May 1998, pp. 587-593. |
Coxford, A., et al., “Advanced Mathematics: A Preparation for Calculus, Second Edition,” 1978, pp. 35-46. |
Davidson, M.F., “Music File Filter,” Sony Music, New York, May 23, 1999. |
Das, et al., “Distributed Priority Queues on Hybercube Architectures,” IEEE, 1996, pp. 620-627. |
Digimarc® Watermarking Guide, © 1999 Digimarc Corporation, 22 pages. |
Dittmann, J., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for digital images,” Proc. SPIE vol. 3657: Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, Jan. 1999, pp. 171-182. |
Dittmann, J., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for customer copy monitoring”, Proc. IEEE Seminar on Secure Images and Image Authentication, Apr. 2000, pp. 6/1-6/6. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 03774648.4 dated Nov. 10, 2010. |
Furon, T. and P. Duhamel, “An asymmetric watermarking method”, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 51, No. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 981-995. |
Guth, H.J. et al., “Error- and Collusion-Secure Fingerprinting for Digital Data,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, LNCS vol. 1768, Sep./Oct. 1999, pp. 134-145. |
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of MPEG-2 encoded video without decoding and re-coding,” Proc. SPIE vol. 3020: Multimedia Computing and Networking 97, Feb. 1997, pp. 264-274. |
Hartung, F., et al., “Digital Watermarking of MPEG-2 Coded Video in the Bitstream Domain,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Apr. 1997, pp. 2621-2624. |
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of uncompressed and compressed video,” Signal Processing, vol. 66, May 1998, pp. 283-301. |
Heegard, C. et al., “On the Capacity of Computer Memory with Defects”, IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. IT-29, No. 5, pp. 731-739 (Sep. 1983) (9 pages). |
http://www.cryptography.com/technology/spdc/index.html. |
Kalker, T., “A security risk for publicly available watermark detectors”, Proc. Benelux Info. Theory Symp., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 1998. |
Kalker T., “System Issues in Digital Image and Video Watermarking for Copy Protection,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Jun. 1999, pp. 562-567. |
Kang et al, “A DWT-DFT Composite Watermarking Scheme Robust to 80th Affine Transform and JPEG Compression”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 8, Aug. 2003. |
Kim, T.Y., et al. “An Asymmetric Watermarking System With Many Embedding Watermarks Corresponding to One Detection Watermark”, IEEE signal processing letters, vol. 11, No. 3, Mar. 2004. |
Kirovski et al., “Multimedia Content Screening using a Dual Watermarking and Fingerprinting System”, Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference, pp. 372-381, 2002. |
D. Kirovski and F.A.P. Petitcolas, “The blind pattern matching attack on watermark systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, Apr. 2003. |
Kirovski et al., “Randomizing the replacement attack”, ICASSP, 2004, pp. 381-384. |
Kirovski, et al., “Multimedia Content Screening using a Dual Watermarking and Fingerprinting System”, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2001-57, Microsoft Research Jun. 2001). |
Kocher, P. et al., “Self-Protecting Digital Content: A Technical Report from the CRI Content Security Research Initiative,” Cryptography Research, Inc. (CRI), 2002-2003 pp. 1-14. |
Kutter, et al., “The watermark copy attack”, Proc. of the SPIE: Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Content II, vol. 3971, Jan. 2000. |
Kuznetsov, A.V. et al., An Error Correcting Scheme for Defective Memory, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 712-718 (Nov. 1978) (7 pages). |
Lacy, C., et al., “Intellectual Property Protection Systems and Digital Watermarking,” Proceedings: Information Hiding, Second International Workshop, Portland, OR, pp. 158-168, 1998. |
Lin et al., “Detection of image alterations using semi-fragile watermarks”, Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents II, vol. 3971, USA, Jan. 2000 (12 pages). |
Lin, P.L., “Robust transparent image watermarking system with spatial mechanisms,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 50, Feb. 2000, pp. 107-116. |
Lotspeich, J., “The Advanced Access Content System's Use of Digital Watermarking,” MCPS '06, Oct. 28, 2006, pp. 19-21. |
“Advanced Access Content System (AACS), Pre-recorded Video Book,” Revision 0.951, Sep. 2009 (86 pages). |
“Civolution's 2nd screen synchronisation solution wins CSI product of the year 2011 award at IBC,” IBC Press Release, Hall 2—Stand C30, Sep. 2011 (2 pages). |
“Content Protection—Self Protecting Digital Content,” http://www.cryptography.com/technology/spdc/index.html, May 2010 (1 page). |
“Red Bee and Civolution develop companion app for FX UK,” http://www.digitaltveurope.net/19981/red-bee-and-civolution-develop-companion-app-for-fx-uk, Jan. 2012 (2 pages). |
Bangaleea, R., et al., “Performance improvement of spread spectrum spatial-domain watermarking scheme through diversity and attack characterisation,” IEEE Africon, pp. 293-298, 2002. |
Cappellini, V., et al. “Robust Frame-based Watermarking for Digital Video,” Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Sep. 2001 (5 pages). |
European Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 07836262.1 filed Jul. 25, 2007 (12 pages). |
European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 12150742.0, filed Oct. 7, 2003 (5 pages). |
European Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758537.2, filed Apr. 21, 2006 (6 pages). |
European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758577.8, filed Apr. 25, 2006 (6 pages). |
European Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06785709.4, filed Jun. 27, 2006 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069306, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (12 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 25, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069302, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (22 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 24, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051857, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/066138, filed Nov. 20, 2012 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 14, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069308, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051855, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/063431, filed Nov. 2, 2012 (10 pages). |
Kirovski, D., et al., “Robust spread-spectrum audio watermarking,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 3:1345-1348, 2001. |
Maehara, F., et al., “A proposal of multimedial home education terminal system based on flash-squeak OS,” Technical report of the institute of image information and television engineers, 28(43):21-24, Jul. 2004. |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (8 pages). |
Office Action dated May 8, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-522802 (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114667 (8 pages). |
Office Action dated May 1, 2013 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114667 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114666 (8 pages). |
Seok, J., et al., “A novel audio watermarking algorithm for copyright protection of digital audio,” ETRI Journal, 24 (3):181-189, Jun. 2002. |
Spangler, T., “Social Science,” http://www.multichannel.com/content/social-science, Sep. 2011 (5 pages). |
Wang, X., et al., “Robust correlation of encrypted attack traffic through stepping stones by manipulation of interpacket delays,” Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on computer communications security, Oct. 27-30, 2003, Washington D.C., USA. |
Wolfgang, R., et al., “Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(7):1108-1126, Jul. 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070110237 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60697515 | Jul 2005 | US |