The present disclosure relates to wave attenuators for reducing or preventing wave action against a floating dock or other structure.
Floating docks typically comprise a platform supported by a plurality of floats. The dock may include a boat house or other structure. Floating docks are typically secured to the shore and are commonly anchored to the bottom surface of a body of water, such as a lake bottom, by one or more large concrete anchors that rest on the lake bottom and are attached to the dock frame by one or more cables and winches. These “deep-water anchors” help to secure a dock in place, but do not completely prevent the dock from moving up and down and side to side as waves move under the dock. Wave action, from wind or watercraft, wears on the dock and can interfere with people's use and enjoyment of the dock. Wave action can also lead to breakaway of the dock, which can lead to further damage as the free-floating dock impacts other objects.
In addition, the deep-water anchors are dangerous and cumbersome, and require ongoing adjustments to work properly. If the anchors are not properly adjusted, structural damage can occur costing thousands of dollars to repair. Also, installation of the anchors is expensive and requires permits and licensed installation personnel, and many permits are denied due to protected habitat. Finally, repairs and periodic maintenance can be expensive because of the need for experienced licensed personnel and specialized equipment.
What is needed is a wave attenuator for floating docks and other structures that is operable to effectively redirect waves away from the dock to prevent the up and down and side to side motion of the dock, that does not require anchoring to the lake bottom, and that is relatively inexpensive compared to currently used dock anchors.
These and other needs and disadvantages may be overcome by the apparatus disclosed herein. Additional improvements and advantages may be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art upon study of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure relates to wave attenuator systems designed to protect a floating dock or other structure from the incoming wake created by wind or vessel. The wave attenuator system, as disclosed herein, may include a substantially rectangular curtain made of a water-impermeable flexible material, the curtain having a top edge and a bottom edge, in various aspects. The curtain top edge is adapted to be secured along the length of at least one of the plurality of sides of the platform, in various aspects. The curtain bottom edge is adapted to be suspended in the body of water a predetermined distance below the water surface, in various aspects. The bottom edge includes a weighted material to maintain the curtain in a substantially vertical orientation, in various aspects. The wave attenuator is operable to redirect waves impacting the curtain downward to reduce wave action against the dock, thereby relieving the dock structures from damaging stresses and reducing the overall uncomfortable motion to the dock, in various aspects.
This summary is presented to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the apparatus disclosed herein as a prelude to the detailed description that follows below. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to identify key elements of the apparatus disclosed herein or to delineate the scope thereof.
The Figures are exemplary only, and the implementations illustrated therein are selected to facilitate explanation. The number, position, relationship and dimensions of the elements shown in the Figures to form the various implementations described herein, as well as dimensions and dimensional proportions to conform to specific force, weight, strength, flow and similar requirements are explained herein or are understandable to a person of ordinary skill in the art upon study of this disclosure. Where used in the various Figures, the same numerals designate the same or similar elements. Furthermore, when the terms “top,” “bottom,” “right,” “left,” “first,” “second,” “inside,” “outside,” and similar terms are used, the terms should be understood in reference to the orientation of the implementations shown in the drawings and are utilized to facilitate description thereof. Use herein of relative terms such as generally, about, approximately, essentially, may be indicative of engineering, manufacturing, or scientific tolerances as would be readily recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art upon study of this disclosure.
The bottom edge 26 of the curtain 21 is weighted to bias the curtain 21 downward to maintain the curtain 21 in a substantially vertical orientation, in various aspects. The bottom edge 26 is preferably a reinforced vinyl webbing that forms an elongated pocket for receiving a weighted material 27, such as a stainless steel rod. Other weighted materials, such as rocks or sand, could be used. The width of the curtain 21 is preferably commensurate with the width of the dock side to which the wave attenuator 20 is affixed. The height of the curtain 21 preferably allows the top edge 22 of the curtain 21 to be affixed to the platform 11 such that the bottom edge 26 is suspended in the water at least 3 feet below the water surface 13, and more preferably from 5 to 10 feet below the water surface 13, and most preferably from 5 to 7 feet below the water surface 13.
In use, the top edge 22 of the wave attenuator 20 is secured to at least one of the sides of the platform 11 based on the location(s) that waves typically impact the dock, in various aspects. The top edge 22 is preferably secured along its entire length to the platform 11. The weighted bottom edge 26 maintains the curtain 21 in a substantially vertical orientation. When incoming waves impact the curtain 21, the wave force W moves along the outer surface of the curtain 21 in a downward direction so that the wave does not materially impact the platform 11, illustrated in
In an alternate implementation shown in
In another alternate implementation shown in
In another alternate implementation shown in
The foregoing discussion along with the Figures discloses and describes various exemplary implementations. These implementations are not meant to limit the scope of coverage, but, instead, to assist in understanding the context of the language used in this specification and in the claims. The Abstract is presented to meet requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 1.72(b) only. Accordingly, the Abstract is not intended to identify key elements of the apparatus, methods, and manufactures disclosed herein or to delineate the scope thereof. Upon study of this disclosure and the exemplary implementations herein, one of ordinary skill in the art may readily recognize that various changes, modifications and variations can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventions as defined in the following claims.
The present application claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/224,243, filed on Jul. 21, 2021, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5242243 | Bachelier | Sep 1993 | A |
5688075 | Gradek | Nov 1997 | A |
6485229 | Gunderson, III | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7140599 | Spink | Nov 2006 | B1 |
8807869 | Lee | Aug 2014 | B1 |
9410300 | Atilano | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9624636 | Andrus | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10724195 | Carney | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20050271470 | Rytand | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070283866 | Veazey | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100196098 | Danskine | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20150152614 | Burt | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202099780 | Jan 2012 | CN |
2910433 | Jun 2008 | FR |
WO-2014013484 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63224243 | Jul 2021 | US |