This application is the US National Phase under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/JP2007/070457 filed on Oct. 19, 2007, which claims the benefit of Japanese Application No. JP 2006-315690 filed on Nov. 22, 2006, the disclosures of which Applications are incorporated by reference herein.
The invention relates to a waveform equalizer for removing multipath interference in a receiver for digital broadcasting and digital radio communication.
A waveform equalizer for removing multipath interference is mounted on a receiver for digital broadcasting and digital radio communication. Multipath interference is a phenomenon in which a plurality of signals transmitted through different paths reach a receiver and an interference signal (ghost) that interferes with a main signal to be received is observed. The waveform equalizer restores such an interfered main signal.
A pre-ghost and a post-ghost may be generated as an interference signal of multipath interference. A pre-ghost is a transmitted signal that reaches a receiver earlier than a main signal, while a post-ghost is a transmitted signal that reaches a receiver later than a main signal.
A waveform equalizer having an FIR (finite impulse response) filter and an IIR (infinite impulse response) filter is used to equalize a received signal that includes a pre-ghost and a post-ghost. An example of such a waveform equalizer is disclosed in Patent document 1. The waveform equalizer of Patent document 1 implements reduction in power consumption and circuit area by varying convolution operation accuracy according to a calculated operation accuracy control value.
However, such a waveform equalizer may cause wrong convergence of FIR tap coefficients due to a ghost included in an input signal. In other words, wrong convergence of tap coefficients of an FIR filter may occur due to a post-ghost that is suppressed by an IIR Filter, causing degradation in waveform equalizing capability.
It is an object of the invention to prevent tap coefficients of an FIR filter from converging to wrong values in a waveform equalizer having an FIR filter and an IIR filter.
According to the invention, a waveform equalizer for performing waveform equalization of an input signal and outputting a waveform equalization result as an output signal includes: an FIR (finite impulse response) filter for performing a convolution operation between the input signal and a plurality of tap coefficients; an IIR (infinite impulse response) filter for performing a convolution operation between the output signal and a plurality of tap coefficients; an adding section for adding an operation result of the FIR filter and an operation result of the IIR filter and outputting an addition result as the output signal; an error detecting section for detecting an error of the output signal and outputting the detected error; and a tap coefficient updating section for updating respective tap coefficients of the FIR filter and the IIR filter based on the error. The tap coefficient updating section sets a step size for updating the tap coefficients of the FIR filter to a value smaller than a step size for updating the tap coefficients of the IIR filter during a period from start of operation of the waveform equalizer until a predetermined condition is satisfied.
As described above, the step size for updating the tap coefficients of the FIR filter is set to a value smaller than the step size for updating the tap coefficients of the IIR filter during the period from the start of operation of the waveform equalizer until the predetermined condition is satisfied. Therefore, the tap coefficients of the IIR filter can be made to converge earlier than the tap coefficients of the FIR filter, thereby preventing wrong convergence of the tap coefficients of the FIR filter due to a ghost that is suppressed by the IIR filter.
According to the invention, the step size is properly controlled in the operation of updating respective tap coefficients of the FIR filter and the IIR filter. Therefore, the tap coefficients of the FIR filter can be prevented from converging to wrong values. Since a relatively simple circuit is used, waveform equalizing capability of the waveform equalizer can be improved without significantly increasing the circuit area.
10 FIR filter
20 IIR filter
32 adder
34 error detecting section
40 tap coefficient updating section
62, 262, 362 comparator
64 counter
66 differentiator
Hereinafter, embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The FIR filter 10 delays the input signal IS to obtain a plurality of tap values each delayed by a predetermined time. The FIR filter 10 performs a convolution operation between the input signal IS and a plurality of tap coefficients respectively corresponding to the plurality of tap values and outputs the operation result to the adder 32 as a signal FO. The IIR filter 20 delays an output signal ES of the waveform equalizer of
The adder 32 adds the signals FO and IO and outputs the result as an output signal ES. The error detecting section 34 detects an error ER between the output signal ES and a desired signal and outputs the detected error ER to the tap coefficient updating section 40. The tap coefficient updating section 40 updates the respective tap coefficients of the FIR filter 10 and the IIR filter 20 according to the error ER.
The delay devices 12B through 12N are serially connected to each other and an output of each delay device is connected to an input of a delay device of the subsequent stage. Each of the delay devices 12B through 12N delays an input signal by a delay TS and outputs the resultant signal. It is herein assumed that an input of the delay device 12B (an input signal IS) is a tap value FTP1 and outputs of the delay devices 12B through 12N are tap values FTP2, FTP3, . . . , FTPn, respectively. Tap coefficients FC1, FC2, . . . , FCn correspond to the tap values FTP1 through FTPn, respectively. The delay TS is equal to a symbol period of the input signal IS.
The multiplier 14A multiplies the tap value FTP1 by the corresponding tap coefficient FC1 and outputs the multiplication result FR1 to the adder 16. Similarly, each of the multipliers 14B through 14N multiplies a corresponding one of the tap values FTP2 through FTPn by a corresponding one of the tap coefficients FC2 through FCn and outputs a corresponding one of the multiplication results FR2 through FRn to the adder 16. The adder 16 adds all the multiplication results obtained by the multipliers 14A through 14N and outputs the result. By repeating such an operation, the FIR filter 10 performs a convolution operation between the input signal IS and the tap coefficients FC1 through FCn, and outputs the operation result to the adder 32 as a signal FO.
The delay devices 22B through 22M are serially connected to each other and an output of each delay device is connected to an input of a delay device of the subsequent stage. Each of the delay devices 22B through 22M delays an input signal by a delay TS and outputs the resultant signal. It is herein assumed that an input of the delay device 22B (an output signal ES) is a tap value ITP1 and outputs of the delay devices 22B through 22M are tap values ITP2, ITP3, . . . , ITPm, respectively. Tap coefficients IC1, IC1, . . . , ICm correspond to the tap values ITP1 through ITPm, respectively.
Each of the multipliers 24A through 24M multiplies a corresponding one of the tap values ITP1 through ITPm by a corresponding one of the tap coefficients IC1 through ICm and outputs a corresponding one of the multiplication results IR1 through IRm to the adder 26. The adder 26 adds all the multiplication results obtained by the multipliers 24A through 24M and outputs the result. By repeating such an operation, the IIR filter 20 performs a convolution operation between the output signal ES and the tap coefficients IC1 through ICm and outputs the result to the adder 32 as a signal IO.
In
The step size control section 58 outputs an FIR step size SSF for updating the filter coefficients of the FIR filter 10 and an IIR step size SSI for updating the filter coefficients of the IIR filter 20.
An operation of updating tap coefficients FCi and ICi will be described below as an example. The multiplier 51 multiplies an error ER and a tap value FTPi and outputs the multiplication result FTi. The multiplier 52 multiplies the multiplication result FTi and the FIR step size SSF and outputs the multiplication result FMi to the integrator 55. The integrator 55 accumulates the multiplication result FMi and outputs the result to the FIR filter 10 as a new tap coefficient FCi. The multipliers 51 and 52 and the integrator 55 perform such processing for all the tap coefficients FC1 through FCn of the FIR filter 10.
The multiplier 53 multiplies an error ER and a tap value ITPi and outputs the multiplication result ITi. The multiplier 54 multiplies the multiplication result ITi and the IIR step size SSI and outputs the multiplication result IMi to the integrator 56. The integrator 56 accumulates the multiplication result IMi and outputs the result to the IIR filter 20 as a new tap coefficient ICi. The multipliers 53 and 54 and the integrator 56 perform such processing for all the tap coefficients IC1 through ICm of the IIR filter 20.
The counter 64 starts a count operation when operation of the waveform equalizer of
As described above, the FIR step size SSF is smaller than the IIR step size SSI until a predetermined time elapses from the start of the operation. Therefore, the tap coefficients of the IIR filter 20 can be made to converge earlier than the tap coefficients of the FIR filter 10, thereby preventing wrong convergence of the tap coefficients of the FIR filter 10 due to a ghost that is suppressed by the IIR filter 20. As a result, waveform equalizing capability of the waveform equalizer can be improved.
The differentiator 66 receives tap coefficients IC1 through ICm from the IIR filter 20 and obtains an absolute value of a derivative value for each of the tap coefficients IC1 through ICm. The differentiator 66 then obtains a sum ADI of the respective absolute values and outputs the sum ADI to the comparator 262. The comparator 262 compares the sum ADI with a switch threshold value and outputs an FIR step size SSF according to the comparison result.
It is herein assumed that the switch threshold value is set to 0.05 in the comparator 262. When the sum ADI is equal to or larger than 0.05, the comparator 262 outputs 1/32 as an FIR step size SSF and ⅛ as an IIR step size SSI. When the sum ADI becomes smaller than 0.05, the comparator 262 outputs ⅛ as an FIR step size SSF and an IIR step size SSI.
As described above, even when the step size control section 25 of
The counter 64 and the differentiator 66 are the same as those described with reference to
A switch threshold value is set to, for example, 100 ms in the comparator 362. The comparator 362 increases the switch threshold value when the sum ADI is equal to or larger than a predetermined value, and decreases the switch threshold value when the sum ADI is smaller than the predetermined value. The comparator 362 is otherwise the same as the comparator 62.
As described above, even when the step size control section 358 is used instead of the step size control section 58 of
Note that the FIR step size SSF, the IIR step size SSI, and each switch threshold value described in the above embodiments are by way of example only and may have different values from those described above. The FIR step size SSF may be zero.
Industrial Applicability
As has been described above, the invention is capable of preventing tap coefficients of an FIR filter from converging to wrong values. Therefore, the invention is useful for a waveform equalizer and the like.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2007/070457 | Oct 2007 | WO | international |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2007/070457 | 10/19/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/9/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/062622 | 5/29/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5777910 | Lu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5901075 | Offord et al. | May 1999 | A |
6351781 | Gracias et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6426972 | Endres et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449586 | Hoshuyama | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6611555 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6711205 | Beaney | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7050491 | McDonald et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20010011213 | Hindie et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020097794 | Smith et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030223489 | Smee et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050013450 | Kumazawa | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001-267981 | Sep 2001 | JP |
WO 0059168 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100013570 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |