One or more embodiments relate generally to loudspeakers, and in particular, to a waveguide for smooth off-axis frequency response.
A loudspeaker reproduces audio when connected to a receiver (e.g., a stereo receiver, a surround receiver, etc.), a television (TV) set, a radio, a music player, an electronic sound producing device (e.g., a smartphone), video players, etc. A loudspeaker typically distributes low frequency sound waves in all directions, whereas the loudspeaker typically focuses high frequency (e.g., 2 kiloHertz (kHz) to 20 kHz) sound waves to a narrow beam.
One embodiment provides a waveguide for controlling sound directivity of high frequency sound waves generated by a speaker driver. The waveguide is positioned in front of the speaker driver. The waveguide comprises one or more ridge areas, one or more recess areas, and one or more smooth surfaces. Each smooth surface connects a ridge area to a recess area to create a smooth transition between the ridge area and the recess area without any seams or sharp transitions. The waveguide shapes propagation of the sound waves to provide a smooth off-axis frequency response for the sound waves.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the one or more embodiments will become understood with reference to the following description, appended claims and accompanying figures.
The following description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of one or more embodiments and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts claimed herein. Further, particular features described herein can be used in combination with other described features in each of the various possible combinations and permutations. Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms are to be given their broadest possible interpretation including meanings implied from the specification as well as meanings understood by those skilled in the art and/or as defined in dictionaries, treatises, etc.
One or more embodiments relate generally to loudspeakers, and in particular, to a waveguide for smooth off-axis frequency response. One embodiment provides a waveguide for controlling sound directivity of high frequency sound waves generated by a speaker driver. The waveguide is positioned in front of the speaker driver. The waveguide comprises one or more ridge areas, one or more recess areas, and one or more smooth surfaces. Each smooth surface connects a ridge area to a recess area to create a smooth transition between the ridge area and the recess area without any seams or sharp transitions. The waveguide shapes propagation of the sound waves to provide a smooth off-axis frequency response for the sound waves.
For expository purposes, the terms “loudspeaker”, “loudspeaker device”, and “loudspeaker system” may be used interchangeably in this specification.
For expository purposes, the term “listening position” as used in this specification generally refers to a position of a listener relative to a loudspeaker device.
To reproduce audio that sounds good at an intended listening position, a loudspeaker should have a flat frequency response at this position. This may be achieved via digital signal processing (DSP) techniques, such equalization (EQ). A loudspeaker typically focuses high frequency sound waves to a narrow beam in a direction perpendicular to a diaphragm of a speaker driver of the loudspeaker. As a result, it is not possible to achieve a flat frequency response at off-axis points (i.e., listening positions that are not an intended listening position) as sound energy drops with higher frequencies as a listener moves away from a sweet spot. A loudspeaker, however, can still be perceived as a good loudspeaker at these off-axis points if a frequency response at these points drops smoothly and monotonously with increasing frequencies; such a frequency response cannot be attained via DSP, while simultaneously maintaining a flat frequency response at the on-axis position (i.e., the intended listening position).
Sound reproduced from a loudspeaker in a room can reflect off walls, a ceiling, and a floor of the room. For example, if the loudspeaker is in a room with four walls, a flat ceiling, and a flat floor, horizontal and vertical planes contain sound that can reach a listener with just one reflection. Sound reflecting off walls at oblique angles is likely to need more than one reflection to reach a listener, and is therefore less important than sound in horizontal and vertical planes.
A loudspeaker device includes at least one speaker driver for reproducing sound.
The speaker driver 55 is one of a low-frequency speaker driver, a mid-frequency (200 Hertz (Hz) to 2 kiloHertz (kHz)) speaker driver, or a high-frequency (e.g., 2 kHz to 20 kHz) speaker driver.
The diaphragm 65 transfers an electrical signal received from an amplifier (e.g., an applied voltage from a voltage source amplifier) for driving the speaker driver 55 into an acoustic signal. Displacement/excursion of the diaphragm 65 creates sound waves.
The diaphragm 65 may include ridge areas and recess areas to add mechanical stiffness to the diaphragm 65. Such ridge areas and recess areas, however, do not control beamwidth or provide smooth off-axis frequency response as the ridge area and recess areas are typically too small (i.e., has very small dimensions/size) to be able to direct sound spatially (i.e., cannot operate as acoustic waveguides).
A loudspeaker device may include at least one acoustic waveguide for directing sound reproduced by at least one speaker driver of the loudspeaker device spatially.
The waveguide 50 includes a throat 50T positioned at one end of the waveguide 50 and within proximity of the diaphragm 65. The throat 50T defines a bottom portion (i.e., base) of the waveguide 50 that begins/starts at an exit 55E of the speaker driver 55.
The waveguide 50 further includes a mouth 50M positioned at an opposite end of the waveguide 50. The mouth 50M defines a top portion of the waveguide 50 that ends/terminates at a mouth exit/termination 50E defined as a cutout/opening in a top plane/plate/surface 52 where the mouth 50M joins/meets the top plane/plate/surface 52. A shape of the mouth exit/termination 50E may be circular, quadrilateral (e.g., a trapezoid, a square, a rectangle, etc.), elliptical, polygonal, or any other shape.
There is a gradual change in a cross sectional area of the waveguide 50 as the waveguide 50 transitions from the throat 50T to the mouth 50M (i.e., flare). During operation of the loudspeaker device 10, the waveguide 50 shapes propagation of acoustic energy reproduced by the speaker driver 55 to project the acoustic energy out of the mouth exit/termination 50E.
Unlike the diaphragm 65 that produces sound waves, the waveguide 50 does not produce sound waves. Instead, the waveguide 50 directs sound waves in a desired direction.
The top plane/plate/surface 52 can be substantially parallel to a horizontal axis, slanted, or curved.
For expository purposes, the term “hot spots” as used in this specification generally refers to effects of sound waves at particular frequencies at particular listening positions, wherein a listener at such positions either hears too much sound or too little sound at select frequency bands.
Conventionally, acoustic waveguides for loudspeaker devices exhibit seams or sharp elements/transitions (e.g., corners or edges) that result in “hot spots”.
Embodiments of the invention provide an acoustic waveguide for beamwidth control and smooth off-axis frequency response for high frequency sound waves. In one embodiment, the waveguide does not exhibit any seams or sharp elements/transitions. The waveguide provides a frequency response at off-axis listening positions that drops smoothly and monotonously (i.e., smooth and monotonous decay) with sound waves of higher frequencies, resulting in a smooth change of timbre as a listener moves to different listening positions. The waveguide disperses sound to a beam that is kept as wide as possible, creating smoother frequency responses in a wider spatial area of the room (i.e., a wider sweet spot with minimal loss of high frequency soundwaves at off-axis listening positions).
One embodiment provides a waveguide with a clover-like shape to control beamwidth and provide smooth off-axis frequency response for high frequency (e.g., 2 kHz to 20 kHz) sound waves.
The waveguide 100 comprises one or more smooth surfaces 110, one or more ridge areas (“ridges”) 120 extending in a radial direction, and one or more recess areas (“recesses”) 130. Each recess 130 is positioned in between a pair of ridges 120. Each smooth surface 110 connects a ridge 120 with a recess 130. As shown in
A bottom/first portion of the waveguide 100 includes a throat 105T (
A top/final portion of the waveguide 100 includes a mouth 105M that ends/terminates at a mouth exit/termination 105E defined as a cutout/opening in a top plane/plate/surface 106 where the mouth 105M joins/meets the top plane/plate/surface 106. The mouth exit/termination 105E is a portion of the waveguide 100 that transitions between the mouth 105M and the top plane/plate/surface 106.
The top plane/plate/surface 106 has one or more outer edges/sides that together define an outer perimeter 111 of the waveguide 100. In one example embodiment, as shown in
The waveguide 100 disperses sound to a wider beam, creating smoother frequency responses in a wider spatial area of a room. In one embodiment, the recesses 130 are arranged and designed/shaped as smooth clover-like transitions that provide a wide coverage angle (i.e., wide sweet spot). In another embodiment, the recesses 130 have different arrangements and designs/shapes.
Unlike conventional acoustic waveguides that exhibit seams or sharp transitions that result in “hot spots”, the smooth surfaces 110 remove occurrences of such hot spots.
The ridges 120 control sound directivity of high frequency sound waves produced by the speaker driver 55 in the horizontal and vertical planes, providing a smooth off-axis frequency response for the sound waves in both of these planes. In one embodiment, the ridges 120 and the recesses 130 also control how sound is directed at oblique angles.
Acoustic impedance of air at a throat of the waveguide 100 may be high, whereas acoustic impedance of air at a mouth of the waveguide 100 may be low. The waveguide 100 creates a smooth acoustic impedance match. Without the waveguide 100, the impedance transition for air is not smooth, resulting in a frequency response that is not smooth (e.g., EQ required).
For example, the ridges 120 may alter acoustic impedance of air that the speaker driver 55 encounters. To counter this effect, the recesses 130 help balance the acoustic impedance to keep an off-axis frequency response for sound waves produced by the speaker driver 55 as flat as possible.
The waveguide 100 is mountable to a mounting surface (not shown) of the loudspeaker device 10, such as a baffle.
Lines A-A and B-B are shown in
In one embodiment, the mouth 105M of the waveguide 100 smoothly and continually transitions to the top plane/plate/surface 106 at an angle about the mouth exit/termination 105E (i.e., a tangency angle is formed between the mouth 105M and the top plane/plate/surface 106, such that the waveguide 100 ends substantially tangential to the top plane/plate/surface 106).
In one embodiment, a throat of the waveguide 100 smoothly and continually transitions from an exit of the speaker driver 55 at an angle about a throat entrance/start 105S (i.e., a tangency angle is formed between the throat entrance/start 105S and the exit of the speaker driver 55, such that the waveguide 100 starts substantially tangential to the exit of the speaker driver 55).
In another embodiment, the waveguide 100 has a different number of ridges 120 and recesses 130.
In situations where planes other than the horizontal and vertical planes are important for precise sound directivity control, an optimal number of ridges and orientation of the ridges required for a waveguide 100 may be different. For example, in one embodiment, an optimal number of ridges required for a waveguide 100 for a particular loudspeaker device 10 may be one.
In one embodiment, opposing ridges 120 (e.g., left and right ridges, or top and bottom ridges) of a waveguide 100 need not be symmetric. For example, if a loudspeaker device 10 is positioned close to a side wall, it may be beneficial to design a waveguide 100 for the loudspeaker device 100 that produces an asymmetric directivity with respect to the vertical plane.
In one embodiment, the waveguide 100 can be incorporated in high frequency audio systems.
In one embodiment, the waveguide 100 can be used to direct sound produced from a compression driver.
In one embodiment, the waveguide 100 can be incorporated in large loudspeaker systems, such as systems for professional audio or cinema applications.
The waveguide 100 can be manufactured using existing manufacturing techniques, such as molding, machining, casting, etc.
Typically, optimizing a design/shape of a conventional acoustic waveguide involves multiple steps, specifically optimizing horizontal directivity of the waveguide, separately optimizing vertical directivity of the waveguide, and combining the resulting optimizations.
In one embodiment, optimizing a design/shape of the waveguide 100 involves only a single optimization routine that simultaneously optimizes horizontal directivity and vertical directivity of the waveguide 100. Simultaneously optimizing the horizontal directivity and vertical directivity results in good sound quality at any listening position in space (i.e., horizontal planes, vertical planes, and even oblique planes within a spatial area of a room). This ensures a smooth change of timbre when a listener changes listening positions.
In one embodiment, a waveguide 100 is parameterized using different cross sectional profiles.
For expository purposes, the term “throat axis” as used in this specification generally refers to a central longitudinal axis of a waveguide that is substantially perpendicular to a speaker driver that the waveguide is positioned in front of
For expository purposes, the term “throat tangency angle” as used in this specification generally refers to a tangency angle formed between a throat axis and a tangent line of a cross-sectional profile at a throat entrance/start of a waveguide. For expository purposes, the term “mouth tangency angle” as used in this specification generally refers to a tangency angle formed between a top plane/plate/surface and a tangent line of a cross-sectional profile at a mouth exit/termination of a waveguide.
In one embodiment, an inner radius at the throat (alternatively, throat diameter) is fixed. For example, if the throat continues seamlessly with the shape of an exit of the speaker driver 55 (i.e., tangential throat), an inner radius at the throat is given by the exit of the speaker driver 55. In one embodiment, an outer radius at the mouth (i.e., outer diameter) is fixed. For example, outer endpoints of a cross sectional profile are given by a size of the loudspeaker device 10 (e.g., available width and height for the loudspeaker device 10). In one embodiment, a depth of the waveguide 100 is fixed.
In one embodiment, each cross sectional profile 200, 210, and 220 is defined by a corresponding cubic Bezier curve. In another embodiment, each cross sectional profile 200, 210, and 220 is defined using another parameterization method, such as spine curves, piecewise linear, etc.
In one embodiment, the waveguide 100 has a throat tangency angle that is substantially zero degrees. In another embodiment, the waveguide 100 has a throat tangency angle that is non-zero (e.g.,
Based on the cross sectional profiles 200, 210, and 220, a computer-aided design (CAD) program is used to generate a smooth surface that goes through the cross sections represented by the profiles 200, 210, and 220. Based on the resulting smooth surface, sound directivity of the waveguide is predicted via simulations (e.g., using simulation software).
To achieve a particular measure of sound directivity (e.g., wide beamwidths and smooth off-axis frequency response), designing the waveguide 100 further includes defining/setting one or more target off-axis frequency responses at one or more off-axis angles (i.e., directions) relative to an on-axis frequency response to achieve the particular measure of sound directivity.
As shown in
In alternative embodiments, waveguides for the loudspeaker device 10 have non-tangential throats and/or mouths.
Unlike the waveguide 100 in
In alternative embodiments, waveguides for the loudspeaker device 10 include phase plugs.
References in the claims to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more.” All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the above-described exemplary embodiment that are currently known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. section 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or “step for.”
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Though the embodiments have been described with reference to certain versions thereof; however, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/726,814, filed on Sep. 4, 2018, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4157741 | Goldwater | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4381831 | Putnam | May 1983 | A |
| 4580655 | Keele, Jr. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 5600718 | Dent et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5870484 | Greenberger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6028947 | Faraone | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6059926 | Hiroshima | May 2000 | A |
| 6275592 | Vartiainen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 7013011 | Weeks et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7024014 | Noll | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7197443 | Manrique | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7348908 | Slavin | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7359519 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7372966 | Bright | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7467071 | Manrique | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7477751 | Lyon et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7686129 | Delgado, Jr. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7688984 | De Callafon | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 8073149 | Kuze | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086956 | Su et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8130994 | Button et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8146989 | Godiska et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8204210 | van de Laar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8300837 | Shmunk | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8391498 | Potard | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8538040 | Kirn | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8548184 | Werner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8577047 | Gautama | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8712065 | Solgaard et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8855322 | Ryu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8938084 | Arai | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9042561 | Gautama et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9130527 | Potard | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9154101 | Dhuyvetter | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9161126 | Su et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9374634 | Macours et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9432771 | Oyetunji et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9553554 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9578416 | Gautama et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9635454 | Larrien M | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9661428 | Holladay et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9693148 | Lopez et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
| 9813812 | Berthelsen et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9837971 | Luo et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9883305 | Risberg et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9900690 | Risberg et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9924249 | Sprinkle | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9967652 | Baird et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9980068 | Berthelsen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9992571 | Hu | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10219090 | Adams et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10382860 | Spillmann | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10542361 | Lazar et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
| 20020141098 | Schlager | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030076875 | Oates | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076975 | Stead et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040028242 | Kitamura | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050122166 | Premakanthan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060274904 | Lashkari | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070098190 | Song et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080175397 | Holman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20090180636 | Su et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100092004 | Kuze | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20120203526 | Bai et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120288118 | Gautama et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289809 | Kaib et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130094657 | Brammer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20140051483 | Schoerkmaier | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140254827 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140286500 | Iwamoto et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150010168 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150010171 | Pernici et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150208175 | Pinkerton et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150281844 | Stabile | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150319529 | Klippel et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160134982 | Iyer | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160360331 | Yeh | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160366515 | Mendes et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160373858 | Lawrence et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170055067 | Moro et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170188150 | Brunet et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170272045 | Chadha | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170280240 | Hu | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170318388 | Risberg et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170325019 | Bezzola | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170345438 | Thyssen | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180014120 | Lawrence et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180034430 | Ahmed et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180054671 | Voishvillo | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180192192 | Brunet et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180206049 | Wendell et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20190222939 | Brunet et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190281385 | Brunet et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20200083853 | Brunet et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 107872759 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 0548836 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 1799013 | Feb 2010 | EP |
| 2369852 | Sep 2011 | EP |
| 2642769 | Sep 2013 | EP |
| 3079375 | Oct 2016 | EP |
| 3433342 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2004312141 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005129977 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2007060648 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| 2007081815 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| 2015082754 | Apr 2015 | JP |
| 2015084499 | Apr 2015 | JP |
| 6182869 | Aug 2017 | JP |
| 10-20050023841 | Mar 2005 | KR |
| 10-20130001162 | Jan 2013 | KR |
| 10-20140097874 | Aug 2014 | KR |
| 101445186 | Oct 2014 | KR |
| 2013182901 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2014045123 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| 2015143127 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2015191691 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2017088876 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Henwood, “The Boundary-Element Method and Horn Design”, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 41, No. 6, Jun. 1993, pp. 485-496 (Year: 1993). |
| International Search Report dated Jun. 21, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/002741 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-3, Republic of Korea. |
| U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Aug. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Aug. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Sep. 9, 2019. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/057,711 dated Sep. 17, 2019. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 23, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/011591 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-9, Republic of Korea. |
| ProSoundWeb, “Harman Unveils JBL 3 Series Mk II Powered Studio Monitors,” Jan. 2018, pp. 1-4, EH Publishing, United States, downloaded at: https://www.prosoundweb.com/channels/recording/harman-unveils-jbl-3-series-mkii-powered-studio-monitors/. |
| European Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2019 for European Application No. 16882101.5 from European Patent Office, pp. 1-6, Munich, Germany. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2019 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201680076647.X from Chinese Patent Office, pp. 1-21, Beijing, China (English-language translation included pp. 1-14). |
| Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 21, 2019 for European Application No. 18736189.4 from European Patent Office, pp. 1-7, Munich, Germany. |
| Schurer, H. et al., “Theoretical and experimental comparison of three methods for compensation of electrodynamic transducer nonlinearity.”, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Sep. 1, 1998, vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 723-740, The Netherlands. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 23, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/011200 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-12, Republic of Korea. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/391,633 dated Sep. 18, 2019. |
| U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Oct. 1, 2019. |
| U.S. Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Oct. 18, 2019. |
| U.S. Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Nov. 12, 2019. |
| U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/224,604 dated Oct. 22, 2019. |
| U.S. Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/391,633 dated Dec. 12, 2019. |
| Thomsen, S. et. al., “Design and Analysis of a Flatness-Based Control Approach for Speed Control of Drive Systems with Elastic Couplings and Uncertain Loads,” Proceedings of the 2011-14th European Conference (EPE 2011), Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 2011, pp. 1-10, IEEE Press, United States. |
| Fliess, M. et al., “Flatness and Defect of Nonlinear Systems: Introductory Theory and Examples”, International Journal of Control, Jun. 1995, pp. 1327-1361, vol. 61, Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom. |
| Papazoglou, N. et al., “Linearisation par Asservissement d'unhaut-parleur electrodynamique: approche par les Systemes. Hamiltoniens a Ports”, Memoire De Fin D Etude M2R SAR Parcourt ATIAM, pp. 1-52, Aug. 11, 2014 |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 31, 2017 for International Application PCT/KR2016/015435 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-12, Republic of Korea. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 20, 2018 for International Application PCT/KR2018/000016 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-5, Republic of Korea. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 23, 2018 for European Application No. 16882101.5 from European Patent Office, pp. 1-8, Munich, Germany. |
| Hu, Y. et al., “Effects of the Cone and Edge on the Acoustic Characteristics of a Cone Loudspeaker”, Advances in Acoustics and Vibration, May 21, 2017, pp. 1-12, vol. 2017, Hindawi, Japan. |
| Salvatti, A. et al., “Maximizing performance from loudspeaker ports,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Jan./Feb. 2002, pp. 19-45, v. 50, No. 1/2, United States. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 29, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/000702 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-10, Republic of Korea. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 7, 2019 for International Application PCT/KR2019/001090 from Korean Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-13, Republic of Korea. |
| U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/391,081 dated Mar. 31, 2020. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/391,081 dated May 27, 2020. |
| U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/391,633 dated Mar. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Jun. 14, 2018. |
| U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Jan. 10, 2019. |
| U.S. Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Apr. 11, 2019. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated May 6, 2019. |
| U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/835,245 dated Jul. 15, 2019. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,530 dated Jul. 18, 2019. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/057,711 dated Apr. 2, 2019. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/224,604 dated Feb. 13, 2020. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200077180 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62726814 | Sep 2018 | US |