The present application is related to head-mounted displays, and in particular to utilizing a spatial light modulator including a waveguide.
For most head-mounted displays, the system includes a set of optics, through which light is directed to a digital micromirror device (DMD). The optics generally include a prism and one or more lenses to focus the light. The DMD reflects the light through another set of optics. The second set of optics, directing the light from the DMD to the user's eye, may include one or more lenses, and optionally a waveguide.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
A system including a waveguide is described, which may in some embodiments be used in head-mounted devices (HMDs) for displaying augmented and/or virtual reality images to a user. The use of a waveguide to direct light to a DMD is advantageous because it replaces the prism and optics generally used to direct such light. This enables a lighter weight and thinner display system. This is particularly useful in HMDs, where total weight is an important consideration. Additionally, it has advantages in optical efficiency.
The present system may be used for augmented reality, virtual reality, and/or mixed reality displays. Virtual reality (VR) displays virtual objects only, either in an interactive or non-interactive system. Augmented reality (AR) overlays virtual objects over the real-world environment. Mixed reality (MR) overlays virtual objects, and anchors them to objects in the real world. The present system may be used in any of these types of displays.
The waveguide 130, in one embodiment, is a planar waveguide. In one embodiment, the waveguide 130 has a diffractive element for in-coupling and out-coupling. The diffractive element, in one embodiment, is a diffractive grating. In another embodiment, the diffractive element may be a holographic optical element (HOE). In one embodiment, as will be shown below, the diffractive element for in-coupling may be replaced by a non-diffractive in-coupler. In one embodiment, as will be shown below, the diffractive element for out-coupling may be replaced by a non-diffractive out-coupler.
The waveguide 130 directs the light to a spatial light modulator 140. In one embodiment, light from the waveguide impacts the spatial light modulator. In one embodiment, the spatial light modulator is a digital micromirror device (DMD) 140. The light output 150 modulated by the DMD 140 passes through the waveguide 130, in one embodiment. The light output 150 from DMD 140 is not coupled into the waveguide 130 but rather passes through it.
The light output 150 is then optionally directed through optics 160, to the user's eye. In one embodiment, optics 160 may include a second waveguide to redirect the light. This system is particularly useful in head-mounted devices, where the reduced size and weight resulting from the replacement of some of the optics with a waveguide 130 is particularly beneficial.
Although the alignment of the elements shown here may be used, the light may be redirected using mirrors, waveguides, fiber optics, or other optical elements, without departing from the scope of the present application.
In one embodiment, the depth of the surface relief grating (SRG) varies within the diffractive element 230. One method to adjust the uniformity (how much light is coupling out) of an SRG grating is to vary its depth. As light travels down the waveguide and interacts with an SRG, in one embodiment, the SRG starts with low out-coupling efficiency—almost complete total internal reflection (TIR)—and ramps towards high out-coupling efficiency (out-coupling almost all of the light interacting with the grating). The varying of grating depths can tune the uniformity of the light coming out along the grating. The change in the grating depth may be linear or non-linear. In one embodiment, the SRG's out-coupling efficiency changes continuously, between 1% and 99% efficiency. In another embodiment, the SRG's out-coupling efficiency changes stepwise. In one embodiment, the minimum out-coupling efficiency is between 0% and 5%, while the maximum out-coupling efficiency is between 20% and 100%.
In another embodiment the diffractive element 230 is a volume hologram. In one embodiment, the out-coupling efficiency of the volume hologram is varied, starting with a low out-coupling efficiency and ramping toward an almost complete out-coupling efficiency.
The light is in-coupled using the single diffractive element 230, and out-coupled through the length of the diffractive element 230, to the DMD 240. In one embodiment, the size of the waveguide 210 is between 10 mm and 30 mm, and between 50% and 90% of the waveguide is covered by diffractive gratings. In one embodiment, the waveguide is 18 mm, 75% of which is covered by the diffractive element. In one embodiment, the waveguide 210 is larger than the DMD. In one embodiment, the waveguide is 130% of the size of the DMD 240.
The DMD 240 directs the light 250 through the waveguide 210. However, the light from the DMD 240 is not coupled into the waveguide 210 but rather passes through the waveguide. This is due to the fill factor and angle of incidence of the light. The light from the DMD mostly passes through the waveguide because the DMD mirrors change the angle of incidence of the light from less than the TIR condition to close to 90°. At this large angle of incidence, the light mostly passes through the diffractive grating. In one embodiment, a small portion of the light is in-coupled into the waveguide. However, this lost light does not significantly impact the optical results. In one embodiment, the waveguide 210 passes the light from the DMD 240 through to the user's eye (optionally through additional optical elements, not shown).
In this way, the light is out-coupled to the DMD 240 from the waveguide 210 through the length of the DMD.
The second diffractive element 340 does not in-couple or out-couple the light, but rather expands the beam and directs the light toward the third diffractive element 350. The third diffractive element 350 directs the beam to a micromirror display 370 at the correct angle. The DMD 370 reflects the modulated light 380, which passes through the waveguide 310 and to the user's eye, optionally through some additional optics.
The diffractive elements 330, 340, 350 may be surface relief gratings or volume holograms. This configuration enables the spacing out of the inputs for placement of light source, which is physically advantageous. Having the second diffractive element 340 for beam expansion helps with uniformity, as well as reducing the size requirements of the input light source. In one embodiment, the use of the expanding diffractive element enables the use of a smaller input light source. This reduces size and power requirements for the light source. Although the side view shows a height, and height differences, between the diffractive elements, that is done for visual distinctiveness. In a real configuration, a diffractive element may be fabricated on the waveguide 310 and not add significant height.
In one embodiment, all of the configurations shown may have the in-coupling diffractive element(s), expanding diffractive element(s), and out-coupling diffractive element(s) positioned on either side of the waveguide, or on both sides of the waveguide. Though for simplicity the illustration only shows one of these configurations for other embodiments, it should be understood that such variations may be applied to all configurations.
The non-diffractive out-coupler 740, in one embodiment, is a transflective mirror out-coupler 740. In one embodiment, a geometric waveguide 710 with no diffractive elements is used to illuminate the micromirror display 760. The waveguide 710 includes an array of partially mirrored elements 740, which are transflective mirror out-couplers 740. In one embodiment, the mirrored elements 740 are evenly distributed through the out-coupling region of the waveguide 710. When light in the waveguide interacts with these elements 740, some (1-50%) of the light is reflected and exits the waveguide toward the DMD surface. The remainder of the light remains in the waveguide and may interact with additional elements 740 in the array of mirrored elements. In one embodiment, the mirrored elements 740 are polarization sensitive. In one embodiment, for polarization sensitive mirrored elements 740, a quarter wave plate is placed between the waveguide 710 and the DMD 760. This rotates the polarization of the light, so that light passing through the waveguide 710 to the DMD 760 is out-coupled by transflective mirrors 740, while light modulated by the DMD 760 passes through the waveguide without being in-coupled. In another embodiment, the mirrored elements 740 are not polarization sensitive. In one embodiment, the display is an LCOS display not a DMD.
One of skill in the art would understand that these configurations, in which diffractive in-couplers and out-couplers of the waveguide are replaced with non-diffractive in-couplers and/or out-couplers, may be applied to any of the configurations of the waveguide. A waveguide may have any one of the in-coupler and/or out-coupler and extended configurations and the configurations may be mixed and matched. Thus, one or more of the elements may be diffractive, and one or more of the elements may be positioned on either side of the waveguide, etc.
The incoming light is directed by the second diffractive elements 840A, 840B through the waveguide 810. The third diffractive element 850 out-couples the light toward DMD 860. As noted above, the DMD modulates the light, and in one embodiment, reflects it back through the waveguide.
This configuration enables the system to illuminate a part of the DMD. This may be of interest when only a portion of the field of view has images for display. This may be particularly useful in augmented reality configurations, where the overlaid images do not cover the entire display area. In some embodiments, instead of having the display split in two, it may be split into quadrants, or even more portions. In some embodiments, the partial illumination may be split into even parts, or uneven parts.
This configuration, in one embodiment, enables the differential use of light intensity, which may be useful for example to provide a heads-up display. There are many other uses for enabling differential display between portions of a DMD. Although in this example the in-couplers are on the same side of the waveguide, one of skill in the art would understand that they may be on different sides. Although in this example, the proportions between the first and second out-couplers 1140A, 1140B is approximately 1-to-10, the sizes may have any relationship.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional application No. 62/972,633 filed on Feb. 10, 2020, and incorporated in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6222677 | Budd et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6633350 | Sasakura et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6850221 | Dexter | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6922267 | Endo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7206107 | Levola | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7418170 | Mukawa et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7436568 | Kuykendall, Jr. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7710655 | Freeman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7738053 | Kubota | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8310764 | Yasushi | Nov 2012 | B2 |
9664905 | Bohn et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9779512 | Tomlin et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10156896 | Lee et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10302835 | Danziger | May 2019 | B2 |
10732442 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20020167733 | Roest | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030165067 | Imamura et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040184717 | Koontz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060028436 | Armstrong | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060164607 | Morejon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070081123 | Lewis | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070177275 | McGuire, Jr. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20110018903 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120127062 | Bar-Zeev et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120162549 | Gao et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130082922 | Miller | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117377 | Miller | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125027 | Abovitz | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127980 | Haddick et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130208234 | Lewis | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222384 | Futterer | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130242262 | Lewis | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242392 | Amirparviz et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140063054 | Osterhout et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071539 | Gao | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140140654 | Brown et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140177023 | Gao et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140218468 | Gao et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240351 | Scavezze et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140267420 | Schowengerdt et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140293434 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140300966 | Travers et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140306866 | Miller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320755 | Martinez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140347736 | Liu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150002528 | Bohn et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003796 | Bennett | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016777 | Abovitz et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150103306 | Kaji et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150178939 | Bradski et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150205126 | Schowengerdt | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222883 | Welch | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150222884 | Cheng | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150268415 | Schowengerdt et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150293358 | De et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150302652 | Miller et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309263 | Abovitz et al. | Oct 2015 | A2 |
20150326570 | Publicover et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150346490 | Tekolste et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150346495 | Welch et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160011419 | Gao | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026253 | Bradski et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160067087 | Tedford et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160077338 | Robbins et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160334562 | Richards et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170010466 | Klug et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170059879 | Vallius | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170219841 | Popovich et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242249 | Wall et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242264 | Sissom | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170248750 | Curtis et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170255020 | Tam et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170276940 | Popovich et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170299869 | Urey et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170322419 | Tekolste et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180045965 | Schowengerdt | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180074457 | Jolly | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180196271 | Hong | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180341223 | Shestak | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180364486 | Ding et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190041634 | Popovich et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190179149 | Curtis et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190272802 | Haba et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200019000 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200142121 | Vasylyev | May 2020 | A1 |
20200142356 | Gilles et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200159026 | Waldern et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200341281 | Woods | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200409156 | Sissom et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210333629 | Nichol | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220004009 | Myhre et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220283371 | Tekolste et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104614858 | Feb 2017 | CN |
2001-264682 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2019118357 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019178060 | Sep 2019 | WO |
2020112836 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020115735 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020139752 | Jul 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ARToolKit: Hardware, retrieved via Internet: www.hitl.washington.edu/artoolkit/documentation/hardware.htm, retrieved Apr. 25, 2022, 3 pages. |
Azuma, “A Survey of Augmented Reality,” Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, (Aug. 4, 1997), pp. 355-385. https://web.archive.org/web/20010604100006/http://www.cs.unc.edu/-azuma/ARpresence.pdf. |
Azuma, “Predictive Tracking for Augmented Realty,” TR95-007, Department of Computer Science, UNG-Chapel Hill, NC, Feb. 1995. |
Bimber, et al., “Spatial Augmented Reality—Merging Real and Virtual Worlds,” 2005 https://web.media.mit.edu/-raskar/book/BimberRaskarAugmentedRealityBook.pdf. |
Jacob, “Eye Tracking in Advanced Interface Design,” Human-Computer Interaction Lab Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. I paper/ in Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, ed. by W. Barfield and T.A. Furness, pp. 258-288, Oxford University Press, New York (1995). |
Tanriverdi and Jacob, “Interacting With Eye Movements in Virtual Environments,” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA—paper/Proc. ACM CHI 2000 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, pp. 265-272, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press (2000). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62972633 | Feb 2020 | US |