Many commercial and military technologies require the use of multiple transmission line types, such as coaxial cables, stripline, microstrip, waveguides, and optical fibers. These transmission lines offer different advantages and disadvantages, so it is desirable to transition between two different transmission line technologies within a module or system. Many of these transmission lines transitions tend to only operate efficiently over a narrow frequency band, which greatly reduces the amount of signal spectrum that can flow through them.
In particular, coaxial and waveguide transmission lines are used in a number of electrical modules and systems. A classic example is a waveguide fed antenna (such as a horn) with the waveguide having a signal input from a coaxial cable. This transition consists of the inner conductor of the coaxial line being probed into the waveguide and launching its signal into the waveguide. This transition and other coaxial to waveguide transmission line transitions are used in many applications. Commercially sold or academically documented coaxial-to-waveguide transitions are efficient (low-loss), but very frequency band limited. A need exists for a coaxial to waveguide transmission line transition that operates over a wider frequency band than currently-available transitions and maintains a high level of efficiency.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular element, feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in some embodiments”, and “in other embodiments” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or the same set of embodiments.
Some embodiments may be described using the expression “coupled” and “connected” along with their derivatives. For example, some embodiments may be described using the term “coupled” to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact. The term “coupled,” however, may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still co-operate or interact with each other. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or.
Additionally, use of the “a” or “an” are employed to describe elements and components of the embodiments herein. This is done merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the invention. This detailed description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obviously meant otherwise.
Further, the terms “around, “about” or “approximately” shall generally mean within 20 percent, preferably within 10 percent, and more preferably within 5 percent of a given value or range. Numerical quantities given herein are approximate, meaning that the term “around”, “about” or “approximately” can be inferred if not expressly stated.
The embodiments disclosed herein involve a means to transition between a waveguide transmission line and coaxial transmission line, or vice versa, using a wideband, efficient transition. The disclosed transition allows for extended frequency operation for high power combination of low power amplifiers using a radial combination method.
Transition 20 includes a first rigid portion 30 comprising an inverted hollow cone, a second rigid portion 40 comprising a hollow tube, and a third rigid portion 50 comprising a hollow cone, as shown in
In some embodiments, the second angle θ2 is less than the first angle θ1. In some embodiments, the second angle θ2 is equal to the first angle θ1. In some embodiments, the second angle θ2 is more than the first angle θ1. As an example, the second angle θ2 is more than 90 degrees and the first angle θ1 is less than 90 degrees. In some embodiments, the first angle θ1 and the second angle θ2 are determined according to the equation
where Zc is the impedance, μ is permeability of a medium, ∈ is permittivity of the medium, such as air, θ1 is the first angle, and θ2 is the second angle.
The dimensions of the components of transition 20 may vary depending upon the particular application and system requirements. The following dimensions are provided as an illustrative example for a particular configuration. It should be recognized that even with the particular configuration, such dimensions may vary slightly from the numbers given without departing from the intended operation. Accordingly, as shown in
Further, as shown in
In some embodiments, system 10 further includes a waveguide comprising a top plate 60 and a bottom plate 70 (see
In some embodiments, transition 20 is a stand-alone unit that is incorporated into system 10. In other embodiments, one or more portions of transition 20 are formed as part of another component within system 10. For example, in the stand-alone embodiments, the first end 32 of first rigid portion 30 is in contact with top plate 60. In the other embodiments, first rigid portion 30 is built within the top plate as is shown in
Top plate 60 has an opening 64 therein configured to receive a pin 84 (see
The design of transition 20 is advantageous in that it increases the frequency bandwidth of commonly used coaxial to waveguide transition by about 28% when compared to a state of the art single top conical taper. Further, it increases the bandwidth of the transition by about 42% when compared to a state of the art single bottom conical taper.
As shown, the electric field lines emanating from coaxial conductor 212 within coaxial cable 210 are essentially parallel with waveguide 220. As the electric field E lines transition into the region defined by inner wall 234, the electric field E lines begin to expand out to fill the region, curving significantly beginning where conductor 212 meets second rigid portion 240, but still contained by inner wall 234. Upon reaching third rigid portion 250, the electric field E lines are no longer contained by inner wall 234 and transition outwardly into waveguide 220 between top plate 222 and bottom plate 224. The electric field E lines curve upward and outward from third rigid portion 250 until the electric field E lines eventually become substantially vertical within waveguide 220, as shown.
The conical tapers of the transition, i.e. first rigid portion 230 and third rigid portion 230, allow the transition from the coaxial conductor 210 to waveguide 220 to be performed efficiently at a wide range of frequencies. This occurs because the spacing between the conductors is not one set length, but rather contains the optimal spacing for many different frequencies between the tapered portions.
The transition disclosed above may be suitable for many applications and in various devices. One embodiment of the type of device that may utilize the transition is the radial combiner shown in
As shown best in
One embodiment of the coaxial to waveguide wideband transition disclosed herein was tested in radial combiner 300 as shown in
The ideal loss for a 4-1 combiner/divider from the N-type threaded input to the rectangular waveguide output arms is 75% loss due to the 1:4 power splitting (6 dB loss). It can be seen from lines 410 and 420 that the transition incorporates nearly zero additional loss over a 2:1 bandwidth (10-20 GHz), which is remarkably wideband. Further, the bandwidth of the two transitions represented by lines 430 and 440 operate over a much narrower frequency range (every 10 units on the y-axis is a factor of 10× loss), indicating the advantages of the embodiments of the transition disclosed herein versus the compared transitions represented by lines 430 and 440.
Many modifications and variations of the Wideband Waveguide to Coaxial Transition are possible in light of the above description. Within the scope of the appended claims, the embodiments of the systems described herein may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. The scope of the claims is not limited to the implementations and the embodiments disclosed herein, but extends to other implementations and embodiments as may be contemplated by those having ordinary skill in the art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/309,392 filed Mar. 16, 2016, entitled “Ultra-Wideband Radial Combiner”, the content of which is fully incorporated by reference herein.
The Wideband Waveguide to Coaxial Transition is assigned to the United States Government and is available for licensing for commercial purposes. Licensing and technical inquiries may be directed to the Office of Research and Technical Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific, Code 72120, San Diego, Calif., 92152; voice (619) 553-5118; email ssc_pac_T2@navy.mil; reference Navy Case Number 103526.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2891225 | Lewis et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
3182272 | Borghetti | May 1965 | A |
3725824 | McDonald | Apr 1973 | A |
3728648 | Lerner | Apr 1973 | A |
3737812 | Gaudio et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3942130 | Harp | Mar 1976 | A |
3993966 | Reindel | Nov 1976 | A |
4188590 | Harp et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4234854 | Schellenberg et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4956614 | Baril | Sep 1990 | A |
5214394 | Wong | May 1993 | A |
5920240 | Alexanian et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
8928429 | Song et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20170271740 | Chieh et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Xiaoyong Shan; Zhongxiang Shen, “A Suspended-Substrate Ku-Band Symmetric Radial Power Combiner,” Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, IEEE , vo1. 21, No. 12, pp. 652,654, Dec. 2011. |
Schellenberg, J.; Watkins, E.; Micovic, M.; Kim, B.; Han, K., “W-band, 5W solid-state power amplifier/combiner,” Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT), 2010 IEEE MTT-S International , vol., No., pp. 1,1, May 23-28, 2010. |
Denoual, J. M.; Peden, A; Della, B.; Fraysse, J.-P., “16-Way Radial Divider/Combiner for Solid State Power Amplifiers in the K Band,” Microwave Conference, 2008. EuMC 2008. 38th European , vol., No., pp. 345,348, Oct. 27-31, 2008. |
http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/6838-spatial-combining-technology-revolutionizing-the-microwave-power-amplifier. |
C. Y. Law and A.-V. Pham, “A high-gain 60 GHz power amplifier with 20 dBm output power in 90 nm CMOS,” IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Dig., pp. 426-427, 2009. |
S. Kaijun, F. Yong, and H. Zongrui, “Broadband radial waveguide spatial combiner,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Comp. Lett., vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 73-75, Feb. 2008. |
D. Yazhou, D. Shi-wei, Z. Zhongbo, and W. Ying, “60 GHz low loss, amplitude and phase balanced radial waveguide power combiner,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Electronics, Commun. Control (ICECC), Sep. 2011, pp. 4070-4073. |
D. IL. De Villiers, P. W. van der Walt, and P. Meyer, “Design of a ten-way conical transmission line power combiner,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 302-308, Feb. 2007. |
P. T. Timbie, J. Grade, D. van der Weide, B. Maffei, and G. Pisano, “Stereolithographed MM-wave corrugated horn antennas,” in Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Infrared, Millim. Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz), Oct. 2011, pp. 1-3. |
J.-C. S. Chieh, B. Dick, S. Loui, and J. D. Rockway, “Development of a Ku-band corrugated conical horn using 3-D print technology,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 13, No. , pp. 201-204, 2014. |
C. R. Garcia, R. C. Rumpf, H. H. Tsang, and J. H. Barton, “Effects of extreme surface roughness on 3D printed horn antenna,” Electron. Lett., vol. 49, No. 12, pp. 734-736, Jun. 2013. |
Yazhou Dong; Shi-wei Dong; Ying Wang, “A 60 GHz solid-state power combining system,” Microwave Workshop Series on Millimeter Wave Wireless Technology and Applications (IMWS), 2012 IEEE MTT-S International, vol., No., pp. 1,4, Sep. 18-20, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170271737 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62309392 | Mar 2016 | US |