This disclosure relates to waveguides used for physically unclonable functions applicable on fully functional printed circuit boards.
Security is becoming increasingly important as the internet and electronic devices become more pervasive. For example, computers and even mobile telephones are equipped with biometrics to prevent access by unauthorized users.
Encryption is also used to prevent unauthorized access to devices and information. For example, data can be encrypted before being transmitted on the internet. Other techniques, such as security tokens, are also employed to limit access to devices.
In addition, many electronic systems require a unique digital identifier for authentication, key derivation and other purposes. These electronic systems are often manufactured using traditional manufacturing processes. Creating a unique digital identifier in this environment is often difficult and time consuming. Furthermore, to be effective, the unique digital identifier should be extremely different or nearly impossible to determine and copy.
One method of creating this unique digital identifier is through the use of waveguides.
As mentioned above, these waveguides 20 are traditionally constructed using an inner core 21 surrounded by an outer cladding 22. The outer cladding 22 is then covered by a reflective silver layer 24. The inner core 21 may have a higher refractive index (n) than the outer cladding 22. For example, the inner core 21 may have a refractive index of 1.59, while the outer cladding 22 has a refractive index of 1.49. Light is reflected at the boundary between the inner core 21 and the outer cladding 22 or at the boundary between the outer cladding 22 and the silver layer 24.
As shown in
Therefore, the silver layer 24 provides an important function. First, it serves to keep most of the light within the waveguide 20, allowing all of this light to contribute to the light pattern received at the image sensor 12. Specifically, the silver layer 24 reflects light at lower incident angles that would be otherwise lost. Further, invasive techniques to determine the digital identifier cause disturbances to the silver layer 24 and scatter light from the inner core 21 into the outer cladding 22, both of which change the light pattern. For example, an intrusive probe inserted into the waveguide 20 will disturb the silver layer 24, outer cladding 22 and inner core 21 causing the light to be reflected differently. This difference changes the light pattern received at the image sensor 12, causing the electronic identification to fail.
However, the process of applying a silver coating to a waveguide is labor intensive and expensive. For example, the manufacturing of silver reflectors requires special processing using either vacuum evaporation or plating in an aqueous solution. Vacuum evaporation is expensive and can compromise electrical components. Plating increases the possibility of corrosion and can result in low reflectivity films.
Therefore, it would be beneficial if there were a system and method for creating a unique digital identifier which was easier to manufacture. Further, it would be advantageous if this new waveguide contained more of the light than is currently contained by the silver coating.
An improved waveguide is disclosed. The waveguide comprises four or five layers: an inner core; one or two layers of outer cladding, either on one side of the inner core or sandwiching the inner core, and two layers of a dielectric reflector sandwiching the outer cladding. The refractive index of the inner core is greater than that of the outer cladding. Further, the refractive index of the outer cladding is greater than that of the dielectric reflector. Further, the waveguide can be used to create a physically unclonable function. A light source and an image sensor may be disposed on a printed circuit board. The waveguide may be disposed on the printed circuit board so that light emitted from the light source traverses the waveguide before reaching the image sensor.
According to one embodiment, a waveguide is disclosed. The waveguide comprises an inner core, having a first refractive index; an outer cladding, sandwiching the inner core, having a second refractive index less than the first refractive index; and a dielectric reflector, sandwiching the outer cladding, having a third refractive index less than the second refractive index. In certain embodiments, the outer surface of the dielectric reflector is covered with a metallic layer. In certain embodiments, the outer surface of the dielectric reflector is covered with a second dielectric reflector. According to a further embodiment, a physically unclonable function is disclosed, which comprises the waveguide described above, disposed on a printed circuit board, wherein the printed circuit board comprises a light source for emitting a light into the waveguide; and an image sensor for receiving a light pattern created by the light traversing the waveguide. In certain embodiments, the printed circuit board further comprises a processing unit, a memory element containing encrypted code to be executed by the processing unit and a decryption circuit to decrypt the encrypted code stored in the memory element. In certain embodiment, the processing unit and the decryption circuit are disposed beneath the waveguide. In certain embodiments, the memory element is also disposed beneath the waveguide.
According to another embodiment, a waveguide is disclosed. The waveguide comprises an inner core, having a first refractive index, a first surface and a second surface; an outer cladding, covering at least a portion of the first surface of the inner core, having a second refractive index less than the first refractive index; and a dielectric reflector, covering the outer cladding and the second surface of the inner core, having a third refractive index less than the second refractive index. In certain embodiments, the outer surface of the dielectric reflector is covered with a metallic layer. In certain embodiments, the outer surface of the dielectric reflector is covered with a second dielectric reflector. According to a further embodiment, a physically unclonable function is disclosed, which comprises the waveguide described above, disposed on a printed circuit board, wherein the printed circuit board comprises a light source for emitting a light into the waveguide; and an image sensor for receiving a light pattern created by the light traversing the waveguide. In certain embodiments, the printed circuit board further comprises a processing unit, a memory element containing encrypted code to be executed by the processing unit and a decryption circuit to decrypt the encrypted code stored in the memory element, wherein the processing unit and the decryption circuit are disposed beneath the waveguide.
For a better understanding of the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein by reference and in which:
The present disclosure describes a waveguide that may be used with fully fabricated printed circuit boards to create a physically unclonable function. The waveguide utilizes multiple dielectric materials to create the desired reflections within the waveguide. Further, the waveguide achieves increased reflectivity as compared to prior art waveguides.
As described above, traditional waveguides may use a silver coating to help contain the light within the waveguide. In contrast, the present waveguide uses a third polymer.
The inner core 110, the outer cladding 120 and the dielectric reflector 130 may be polymers. The three polymers used in the waveguide 100 each have different refractive indices, with the inner core 110 having the highest index and the dielectric reflector 130 having the lower index. The inner core 110 and the outer cladding 120 meet at an inner interface 115, while the outer cladding 120 and the dielectric reflector 130 meet at an outer interface 125. In other embodiments, one or more of the layers may be a transparent material.
Each of the layers of the waveguide 100 may be planar, where each layer is a thin rectangular prism. Further, the layers are stacked on top of each other.
As described above, light with a high incident angle 140 stays within the inner core 110, while light with a lower incident angle 150 is contained within the outer cladding 120 and the inner core 110.
Dielectric reflectors may be very efficient, especially for S-polarized light and P-polarized light with incident angles between 60° and 70°. Further, the reflectivity of dielectric reflectors at this range of incident angles is better than that of silver. Thus, the waveguide 100 of
In one embodiment, the inner core 110 has a refractive index of 1.59, while the outer cladding 120 has a refractive index of 1.49. The dielectric reflector 130 may have a refractive index of, for example, 1.40. Of course, any value less than that of the outer cladding 120 may be used, but lower refractive indices may be more beneficial.
According to Snell's Law, the light will be completely reflected if the angle of incidence satisfies the equation:
arcsin(θ)>n2/n1,
where n2 is the refractive index of the outer material and the n1 is the refractive index of the inner material.
If the inner core 110 has a refractive index of 1.59, and the outer cladding 120 has a refractive index of 1.49, then all light having an angle of incidence of at least 70° at the inner interface 115 will be completely reflected within the inner core 110.
According to Snell's Law, as light passes from one medium to a second medium having a different refractive index, the angle of incidence changes according to the equation:
n
1 sin θ1=n2 sin θ2,
where n1 is the refractive index and θ1 is the incident angle of the first medium, and n2 is the refractive index and θ2 is the incident angle of the second medium.
Since the outer cladding 120 has a lower refractive index than the inner core 110, light having an angle of incidence of less than 70° at the inner interface 115 will be refracted at a greater angle. For example, light have an incident angle of approximately 60° at the inner interface 115 will be refracted at an angle of 70°.
Similarly, if the dielectric reflector 130 has a refractive index of 1.40, then all light having an angle of incidence of at least 70° at the outer interface 125 will be reflected. Thus, any light having an angle of incidence of at least 60° at the inner interface 115 will be completely contained within waveguide 100. If the dielectric reflector 130 has a refractive index of 1.3, all light having an angle of incidence of at least 55° at the inner interface 115 will be contained within the waveguide 100. Similarly, if the dielectric reflector 130 has a refractive index of 1.2, all light having an angle of incidence of at least 49° at the inner interface 115 will be contained within the waveguide 100.
In one embodiment, the inner core 110 may be an epoxy core, the outer cladding 120 may be a urethane cladding and the dielectric reflector 130 may be polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Further, in certain embodiments, the dielectric reflector 130 is the outermost layer. In other words, there are no other layers on the outer surface of the dielectric reflector 130.
While the dielectric reflector 130 reflects all of the light having an incident angle that is greater than a threshold value, the same is not true for the silver layer. Silver reflects between about 97% and 98% of the light having an angle of incidence between 40° and 80°. In a waveguide, the light is reflected many times as it traverses the waveguide. If the light is reflected r times, the actual percentage of light that is ultimately received at the image sensor is, at best, (0.98)r. If there are 20 reflections, the actual light reflected is less than 66% of the original light.
Line 300 shows the reflected light intensity of a conventional silver layer. At low angles of incidence, the reflected light intensity is very low, as the light is reflected more times than higher incident angle light. Thus, in the range of incident angles between 40° and 60°, the silver layer reflects only up to about 35% of the total light. At incident angles between 60° and 70°, the silver layer reflects between 40% and 75% of the total light. In contrast, the dielectric reflector, shown in line 310, reflects 100% of the light at incident angles greater than 60° and none of the light at lower angles. In other words, the dielectric reflector 130 reflects far more light having an incident angle of 60° or more. At incident angles less than 60°, the silver layer reflects more light; however, the intensity of the light at these lower incident angles is far less than 40%. Therefore, in total, the dielectric reflector 130 reflects more light than the silver layer.
While
In yet another embodiment, shown in
In this way, if one were to attempt to interrogate the printed circuit board 410 to gain access to the decrypted code, one would necessarily have to pierce or remove the waveguide 100. However, any manipulation of the waveguide 100 will affect the way that light is reflected within the waveguide 100, thereby affecting the light pattern received at the image sensor 412. This change in the light pattern modifies the key, and renders the circuit unusable. Thus, the waveguide of
The present disclosure is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein. Indeed, other various embodiments of and modifications to the present disclosure, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings. Thus, such other embodiments and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Furthermore, although the present disclosure has been described herein in the context of a particular implementation in a particular environment for a particular purpose, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that its usefulness is not limited thereto and that the present disclosure may be beneficially implemented in any number of environments for any number of purposes. Accordingly, the claims set forth below should be construed in view of the full breadth and spirit of the present disclosure as described herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/130,090, filed Mar. 9, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0002, awarded by the U.S. Air Force. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/020044 | 2/29/2016 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62130090 | Mar 2015 | US |