The technical scope of the present invention is that of laying systems for a weapon that ensure its stabilisation.
When a weapon is mounted on a mobile support, that is on a moving vehicle, its laying operations become very difficult to ensure since the weapon is subject to a certain number of disturbances. Firing from such a weapon requires it to be oriented in the direction of the target despite any movement be it linear or angular of the vehicle. One particularity of a vehicle able to move at high speeds (over 50 Km/H) cross country lies in the stresses to which it subjects the weapon and its laying system and which generally correspond to a high frequency level and cover a wide spectrum.
During travelling, these disturbances may come from:
Several methods and devices are known to mitigate the travel effects on the performance of a weapon.
A first method consists in measuring the disturbing angular velocity, for example using gyrometric style means and using it to control the rotational velocity of the motorization system placed between the support and the weapon. It is thus an anticipation control placed in parallel to an automatic control of the position of the weapon on an inertial reference whose efficiency is low so as to attenuate the amplitude of the angular disturbances at mean frequencies. Reference may be made, for example, to patent FR-80.21077.
Another method consists in providing motorization allowing the torque applied to the load to be controlled. This principle is used to improve the efficiency of the reduction in the effects of angular velocity disturbances. This method is suitable for low off-centring values. Reference may be made, for example, to patent U.S. Pat. No. 4,387,624.
When the off-centring between the axial position of the centre of gravity and the rotational axis increases, the performances obtained rapidly deteriorate through a combination of several mechanisms.
First of all, the off-centring of the centre of gravity increases the effect of the vertical acceleration produced (the unbalance effect) when travelling on the angular displacement of the weapon.
The increase in the motorization torque requirement caused by the dynamic torque requirement (in spite of the static equilibrating of the unbalance mass) leads in particular to the increase in inertia of the motor. The sensitivity of the system to mean frequency noises increases as a consequence, with as a corollary the necessity of increasing the filtering of all the sensors. The stabilisation performances are reduced along with the filtering of the sensors.
On certain weapon systems, functional constraints in particular related to the feeding principle of the weapon add to the off-centring of the centre of gravity of the geometric constraints that increase the friction at the trunnions with its effect on the orientation accuracy of the weapon.
Lastly, on other systems, to minimise the necessary volume at the rear and under the axis of orientation of the weapon, the assembly of this weapon requires the axis of orientation to be largely pushed back to the rear of the recoiling mass, this results in a substantial increase in the off-centring with its effect of the orientation accuracy, in particular during travel.
The aim of the present invention is to produce a laying system for a weapon mounted on a mobile carrier allowing pre-stabilising motorization to separate the motorization dimensioning need occasioned by the off-centring of the weapon from that privileging the quality of the orientation control.
The invention thus relates to an elevation laying system for a weapon, characterised in that it comprises first positioning means for the weapon along a wide elevation range with respect to a first axis of rotation offset with respect to the centre of gravity of the weapon, and second positioning means for the weapon connected to the first means along a narrow elevation range with respect to a second axis of rotation passing through the centre of gravity of the weapon.
According to one characteristic, the first axis of rotation is located to the rear of the weapon's centre of gravity.
According to another characteristic, the first positioning means are hinged with respect to a frame onto which the weapon is mounted around the first axis of rotation.
According to another characteristic, the first positioning means comprise a clamp supporting the weapon and connected to the frame and a rotation means, the first axis of rotation being positioned between said clamp and the frame.
According to yet another characteristic, the rotation means ensure the rotation of the clamp with respect to the frame.
According to yet another characteristic, the weapon is mounted able to rotate with respect to the clamp, the second positioning means ensuring the rotation of the weapon with respect to the clamp around the second axis.
According to yet another characteristic, the rotation means are constituted by a jack.
According to yet another characteristic, the second positioning means comprise a motor or back-geared motor integral with the clamp along the second axis of rotation.
According to yet another characteristic, the second positioning means comprise a jack integral with the clamp and whose rod is connected to the weapon.
According to yet another characteristic, the second positioning means comprise a jack integral with the clamp and whose rod is connected to the frame.
According to yet another characteristic, the second positioning means comprise a parallelogram able to deform and connecting the clams to the frame and an actuator integral with one branch of the parallelogram meshed with the second axis of rotation.
A first advantage of the system according to the invention lies in the respect of the organisational needs of the weapon system by displacing the hinge pin so as to respect the functional or global optimisation constraints.
Another advantage lies in the respect of the needs in absolute orientation quality to be imposed on the weapon by adopting a second joint at the centre of gravity.
Another advantage lies in the reduction of parasitic torques between the weapon and the clamp.
Other characteristics, particulars and advantages of the invention will become more apparent following the description given hereafter by way of illustration and in reference to the appended drawings, in which:
As is apparent from the above, the invention consists in providing two motorizations of the weapon with respect to its support. A first motorization, or main motorization, allows the weapon to be roughly oriented in elevation. This motorization allows the weapon to be positioned without any constraints. A second motorization allows the orientation of the weapon to be finely adjusted taking its bearing the main motorization. The advantage of such a system lies in the fact that the range between the weapon and the clamp is limited to stabilisation errors, thereby making it simple to produce. Moreover, since the dimensioning of the second motorization is linked only to the inertia of the weapon to be oriented, efficient torque control is carried out with any specific constraints.
Thus, the laying system according to the invention allows:
It goes without saying that the system according to the invention is integrated into a complex system allowing the weapon to be oriented according to the firing coordinates, its position and deviations with respect to an instruction to be determined, the variations in laying during travelling to be measured and any deviation measured to be corrected.
Given that the second joint is integral with the mobile clamp under the action of the first means, it is thus this first motorization and the automatic control of the axis A1 which will equally withstand the disturbances caused by the friction on the sealing rings and the vertical linear accelerations.
The sealing to be put in place at the bellows 17 is thus relatively small in dimension and the limited range does not require the installation of a friction-based system but simply a system based on flexible bellows. The bearings of this joint are also limited in dimension in that they do not have to integrate heavy functional constraints (feeding of the weapon, for example). Additionally, since the joint is centred, the acceleration disturbances do not have an effect upon the orientation of the weapon.
The range of the weapon 1 with respect to the clamp 2 is subject to two constraints:
In the representation in
Generally speaking, any secondary motorization able to apply a torque to the weapon cradle in a sufficient pass range may be used.
To implement the system according to the invention a set of sensors is used:
All of these sensors allow the operator to know firstly the reference onto which the weapon is required to be oriented and secondly the information concerning the main disturbances acting on the weapon system. Secondary sensors correspond respectively to the angular velocity of rotation of the electric motor of the main motorization and to the differential pressure between the secondary jack's chambers, the latter information corresponding directly to the torque that the secondary motorization applies to the weapon.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
01 06494 | May 2001 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR02/01452 | 4/26/2002 | WO | 00 | 11/17/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/09310 | 11/21/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
946402 | Schneider et al. | Jan 1910 | A |
1353499 | Shearer | Sep 1920 | A |
2712271 | Wabnitz | Jul 1955 | A |
2762265 | Arend | Sep 1956 | A |
3772960 | Johansson | Nov 1973 | A |
4326446 | Magnuson | Apr 1982 | A |
4387624 | Bjurstrom | Jun 1983 | A |
4599933 | Stoner | Jul 1986 | A |
4953443 | Meier | Sep 1990 | A |
5014594 | Muhlhausen et al. | May 1991 | A |
5048392 | Ruttgerodt et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5864085 | Begneu et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6024007 | Searle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6178866 | Searle et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6499382 | Lougheed et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6708597 | Meyers et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
20040159229 | Urvoy | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040200348 | Urvoy | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3241 665 | May 1984 | DE |
0 179 387 | Apr 1986 | EP |
2 421 362 | Oct 1979 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040134339 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |