The present invention pertains to a wear assembly for protecting the front edge of a structure subjected to wear, and is particularly suited for use along the front digging edge of an excavating bucket or the like.
Excavating buckets and other excavating equipment are typically subjected to harsh conditions. A series of wear members are usually provided to protect the digging edges from premature wear. Wear members have been secured to the digging edge in many different ways.
For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,570,365 to Bierwith, the wear members are secured to the lip of the bucket by the use of a wedge and spool lock arrangement that is fit through a hole in the lip spaced from the front edge. In this arrangement, the spool pinches the rear parts of the wear member against the inner and outer faces of the lip as the wedge is driven into the hole. However, under load, the legs of the wear member can shift and cause loosening of the lock and possible loss of the wear member. In addition, the formation of a hole in the lip weakens the lip and its ability to effectively resist the large loads applied as the lip is forced into the ground.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,995,384 to Wood and U.S. Pat. No. 4,748,754 to Schwappach, the hole in the lip is eliminated and replaced with a lateral boss that is welded to the inner face of the lip generally parallel to the front edge. While these constructions avoid weakening the lip with a through-hole, they place very large loads on the lateral boss, and thus, can only be reliably used in low stress environments.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,088,214, the wear member is secured by a boss that is welded to the inner face of the lip so as to extend generally normal to the front edge. The wear member, then, is slipped over the boss via a complementary slot. As can be appreciated, this orientation of the boss greatly reduces the loads on the boss as compared to the lateral bosses. Nevertheless, the wear member is typically secured by a single lock located to one side of the lip. While this is adequate for most applications, this arrangement does orient the lock in an off-center relationship relative to the lip and thus engenders increased vertically oriented stresses on the legs of the wear member as well as the lip. Greater balance in resisting the loads applied to the wear member can be achieved by utilizing a boss and lock for the inner and outer legs (see, e.g., FIG. 5 of the '214 patent). However, this construction requires more steel and twice as many bosses and locks for the attachment of each wear member.
As a result, there is a need for an improved assembly for attaching a wear member to the digging edge of an excavator that avoids the problems of the prior art.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the wear member is secured to the lip of an excavator (e.g., an excavating bucket) in a stable and balanced manner without the formation of a through-hole in the lip. In a preferred construction, the wear assembly includes a boss and a wear member that cooperate to define a passage forward of the front edge face of the lip for receiving the lock. In this way, the lock can be engaged on each side of the central plane of the lip. The lip can be maintained as an imperforate member for greater strength and durability.
In another aspect of the present invention, the lip of the excavator includes an inner face, an outer face and a front edge face. The front edge face includes a plurality of spaced scallops. The scallops cooperate with the wear assembly to permit a through-hole for the lock to be formed forward of the lip without undue forward projection of the boss. The scallops are preferably formed by a concave wall that extends no more than about 180 degrees about an axis that is generally perpendicular to the lip. In this way, the scallop can provide the desired space for the lock without causing significant weakening of the lip.
In one other aspect of the invention, the wear member includes a pair of spaced bearing surfaces to contact the lock generally on opposite sides of the central plane of the lip. In a preferred construction, the wear member is bifurcated to define a pair of rearward legs. One of the legs includes an aperture into which the lock is received. A bearing surface associated with the aperture engages the lock on one side of the central plane of the lip to hold the wear member in place. The other leg includes a rib that extends toward the aperture. The rib includes a bearing surface to engage the lock on an opposite side of the central plane of the lip.
In another aspect of the invention, a boss includes a front part that extends along the front edge face of the lip and a body that extends along the inner or outer face of the lip. The body defines a hole forward of the front edge face of the lip to receive the lock for securing the wear member in place. In the preferred construction, the front part wraps around the lip to define a finger portion that opposes the body. The front part defines an opening that is aligned with the hole in the body to define a passage into which the lock is inserted.
In another aspect of the invention, the boss includes a body that extends along one of the faces of the lip. Rails extend along opposite sides of the boss to cooperate with a complementary structure on the wear member to hold the wear member in place. A brace extends laterally beyond at least part of the body and is fixed to the rails to provide enhanced support to the rails.
In one other aspect of the invention, the boss includes a body that extends along one of the faces of the lip and a brace at a rear end of the body. The brace extends beyond the body in a transverse direction to define a front bearing face against which a rear wall of the wear member can abut. In this way, the applied forces and stresses on the lip can be reduced to thereby lessen the maintenance requirements and lengthen the usable life of the lip.
In another aspect of the invention, the boss is formed with a raised deflector that tends to deflect earthen material away from the wear member when the excavator is reversed. In the preferred construction, the deflector is formed at the rear end of and extends farther from the lip than the forward portions of the boss to be juxtaposed to the rear wall of the wear member. An inclined deflector face is preferably formed to reduce the forces applied to the deflector under reverse loading.
In accordance with the present invention, a wear assembly 10 is provided for attachment along the digging edge of a lip of an excavator. The invention is discussed below in terms of the attachment of a shroud to the lip of a load-haul-dump (LHD) bucket. However, the invention is not limited to the attachment of a shroud or an LHD bucket. The invention could be used to secure other wear members to other excavators, and even to other equipment where the edge is subject to heavy loading and wear as in an excavating environment.
The invention is at times discussed in terms of relative terms, such as up, down, right, left, vertical, horizontal, etc. for the sake of easing the description. These terms are to be considered relative to the orientation of the elements in
Lip 12 forms the front digging edge of an LHD bucket (not shown) to engage and penetrate into the ground for the gathering of earthen material. As seen in
The front edges 14c, 16c of lip sections 14, 16 are defined with spaced scallops or recesses 18, one for each wear assembly 10. In the illustrated example, five uniformly spaced scallops are formed along front edge 14c, and one scallop in each of front edges 16c. The scallops are each preferably formed to have a uniform, continual, arcuate surface 19 with a curvature that extends no more than about 180 degrees about an axis extending generally perpendicular to the lip, and preferably is at about 180 degrees. In this way, lip 12 with scallops 18 can be easily manufactured, provide a robust base to resist the applied loads, and (as discussed below) provide clearance for the lock of wear assembly 10 during use. Nevertheless, the scallops could be formed to have a non-uniform curvature, a discontinuous or angular shape, and/or be formed to have partial closure (i.e., a surface with more than a 180 degree extension such that certain side portions of the scallop are opposed to each other). Each of these variations, though, tends to increase the cost of manufacture, lead to more significant stress concentrations, and/or reduced strength.
As shown in
Boss 20 has a body 22 extending along outer face 14b of lip 12 (
A brace 30 extends laterally across the rear end of body 22. In the preferred construction, the rear ends of rails 24 are integrally fixed to a brace 30 to additionally support the rails when under load. Brace 30 further extends outward beyond the rails to define a stop surface 32 adapted to abut the rear end of shroud 28 and thereby reduce the stress on the boss, which in turn, reduces the stress along front edge 14c, 16c of lip 12. The use of a brace as an abutment and/or to support the rails has applicability in other arrangements for mounting wear members, such as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/216,544, filed concurrently herewith and entitled “Wear Assembly for the Digging Edge of an Excavator” which is in its entirety hereby incorporated by reference.
Brace 30 also preferably has a greater depth than body 22 so that it extends from the lip a greater distance than the body to maximize the surface area able to abut the shroud and to function as a deflector for earthen material when the bucket is reversed to reduce reverse loading of shroud 28. A deflector face 34 inclined forward from outer face 14b, 16b is preferably formed along the rear side of brace 30 to direct the earthen material away from the assembled boss and shroud. Body 22 and brace 30 are formed as an open framework, with openings 36 to reduce the amount of needed steel and to facilitate welding of the boss to the lip.
A front part 38 of boss 20 wraps around front edge 14c, 16c of lip 12 to define a finger portion 39 along inner face 14a, 16a. Inner surface 40 of boss 20 (i.e., the surface that faces lip 12) is shaped to conform to the shape of the particular lip to which it is fixed. In this case, the inner face includes an upright face 42 to set against front edge 14c, 16c and an upper face 44 to set against ramp 46 of inner face 14a. In the preferred construction, the bosses attached to corner sections 16 are the same as those attached to center section 14. However, other attachments are possible. If the front of the lip had a curved or other shape, inner surface 40 would be changed to match the shape of the lip. The front face 48 of boss 20 preferably has a uniform curved shape, but other shapes are possible. Alternatively, front part 38 could be formed to simply be upturned to abut against front edge 14c, 16c and not overlie inner face 14a, 16a. Also, front part 38 could be entirely omitted so that boss 20 only lies along outer face 14b, 16b. In addition, body 22 could be fixed to inner face 14a, 16a instead of outer face 14b, 16b if desired.
A recess 50 is formed in finger portion 39. A hole 52 in body 22 is aligned with recess 60 to collectively define a passage 54 for receiving a lock 56. In the preferred construction, recess 50 has a generally U-shaped configuration; though other shapes are possible. The main wall 57 of recess 50 is preferably aligned with upright face 42 for bearing against the lock . Hole 52 has a main portion 58 that preferably has a laterally elongated, generally rectangular shape; though other shapes are possible. The shapes of recess 50 and hole 52 are largely dependent on the shape of the lock. While hole 52 preferably extends through body 22, it could have a closed lower end (which would result in the elimination of rib 62). A pocket 60 is defined along a medial section of main portion 58 to receive a rib 62 of shroud 28. A groove 64 is formed in front face 48 and through front part 38 to connect with main portion 58 of hole 52. Groove 64 is provided to permit the passage of rib 62 to pocket 60 and is thus aligned with pocket 60. Boss 20 is fixed to lip 12 such that recess 50 and hole 52 are centrally aligned with one of the scallops 18 (
In the preferred construction, shrouds 28 have a front working portion 66 that tapers to a narrowed front edge 68, and a rear mounting portion 70 that is bifurcated to define an inner leg 72 and an outer leg 74 (
Shroud 28 includes an inner surface 85 that includes inner face 80 of outer leg 74, inner face 87 of inner leg 72, and the inner corner surface 89 at the intersection of legs 72, 74 (
When shroud 28 is installed, it is slid over lip 12 such that inner and outer legs 72, 74 straddle the lip (
Once shroud 28 is fully pushed onto boss 20, lock 56 is inserted into aperture 86, recess 50, hole 52 and one of the scallops 18 (
The use of step 112 permits a larger, more robust portion of the lock to be fit within aperture 86 and to include a cavity 116 to contain the elastomeric material (not shown). The narrower portion below step 112 permits the use of a scallop 18 having minimal depth. When assembled, scallop wall 19 is juxtaposed to outer section 108b just below step 112 (
Latch 104 is preferably pivotally mounted within cavity 116 of body 102 (
To facilitate removal of lock 56, shroud 28 includes groove 96 to permit the insertion of a tool (not shown) to push the latch rearward against the bias of the elastomer (
Shrouds 28 are preferably formed of two different constructions along their sides. As seen in FIGS. 1 and 13-16, one kind of shroud 28 includes grooves 142 which receive tongues 144 from the other kind of shroud 28′ (
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/425,605 filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,080,470.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1031138 | McKee et al. | Jul 1912 | A |
1076548 | Butler | Oct 1913 | A |
1485243 | Blake | Feb 1924 | A |
1775984 | Younie | Sep 1930 | A |
1959847 | Buskirk | May 1934 | A |
2113420 | Younie | Apr 1938 | A |
3160967 | Nichols | Dec 1964 | A |
3456370 | Gilbertson | Jul 1969 | A |
3685177 | Hahn et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3736664 | Black et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3841007 | Howarth et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3851413 | Lukavich | Dec 1974 | A |
3864853 | Klett et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3947982 | Mantovani | Apr 1976 | A |
3974579 | Black et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3995384 | Wood | Dec 1976 | A |
4006544 | Stepe | Feb 1977 | A |
D245780 | Dahlberg et al. | Sep 1977 | S |
4074449 | Lanz et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4103442 | Zepf | Aug 1978 | A |
4205469 | Johansson et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4449309 | Hemphill | May 1984 | A |
4457380 | Curry | Jul 1984 | A |
4501079 | Hahn et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4570365 | Bierwith | Feb 1986 | A |
4716667 | Martin | Jan 1988 | A |
4748754 | Schwappach | Jun 1988 | A |
5005304 | Briscoe et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5016365 | Robinson | May 1991 | A |
5052134 | Bierwith | Oct 1991 | A |
5063695 | Briscoe et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5075986 | Smith et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5088214 | Jones | Feb 1992 | A |
5241765 | Jones et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5283965 | Clendenning | Feb 1994 | A |
5396964 | Shellhorn et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5412885 | Cornelius | May 1995 | A |
5438774 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465512 | Livesay et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5553409 | Irving | Sep 1996 | A |
5564508 | Renski | Oct 1996 | A |
5634285 | Renski | Jun 1997 | A |
5653048 | Jones et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5713145 | Ruvang | Feb 1998 | A |
5806216 | Renski | Sep 1998 | A |
5852888 | Cornelius | Dec 1998 | A |
5937549 | Bender et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5992063 | Mack | Nov 1999 | A |
6047487 | Clendenning | Apr 2000 | A |
6145224 | Stickling | Nov 2000 | A |
6151812 | Bierwith | Nov 2000 | A |
6194080 | Stickling | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209238 | Ruvang | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6393739 | Shambling et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6729052 | Ollinger et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0212642 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050284006 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10425605 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 11216697 | US |