The present invention pertains to a wear assembly for securing a wear member to excavating equipment, and in particular to a wear assembly that is well suited for attachment and use on a dredge cutterhead.
Dredge cutterheads are used for excavating earthen material that is underwater, such as a riverbed. In general, a dredge cutterhead 1 includes several arms 2 that extend forward from a base ring 3 to a hub 4 (
In use, the cutterhead is rotated about its central axis to excavate the earthen material. A suction pipe is provided near the ring to remove the dredged material. To excavate the desired swath of ground, the cutterhead is moved side-to-side as well as forward. On account of swells and other movement of the water, the cutterhead also tends to move up and down, and periodically impact the bottom surface. Further difficulties are caused by the operator's inability to see the ground that is being excavated underneath the water; i.e., unlike most other excavating operations, the dredge cutterhead cannot be effectively guided along a path to best suit the terrain to be excavated. In view of the heavy loads and severe environment, the point and base interconnection needs to be stable and secure.
The cutterheads are rotated such that the teeth are driven into and through the ground at a rapid rate. Consequently, considerable power is needed to drive the cutterhead, particularly when excavating in rock. In an effort to minimize the power requirements, dredge points are typically provided with elongate, slender bits for easier penetration of the ground. However, as the bit becomes shorter due to wear, the mounting sections of the points will begin to engage the ground in the cutting operation. The mounting section is wider than the bit and is not shaped for reduced drag. On account of the resulting increased drag the mounting sections impose on the cutterhead, the points are usually changed at this time before the bits are fully worn away.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a wear member for excavating equipment is formed with side relief in the working and mounting sections to minimize the drag associated with the digging operation and, in turn, minimize the power needed to drive the equipment. Reduced power consumption, in turn, leads to a more efficient operation and a longer usable life for the wear member.
In accordance with the invention, the wear member has a transverse configuration where the width of the leading side is larger than the width of the corresponding trailing side so that the sidewalls of the wear member follow in the shadow of the leading side to decrease drag. This use of a smaller trailing side is provided not only through the working end but also at least partially into the mounting end. As a result, the drag experienced by a worn wear member of the invention is less than that of a conventional wear member. Less drag translates into less power consumption and a longer use of the wear member before it needs to be replaced. Accordingly, the working ends of the wear member can be further worn away before replacement is needed.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the wear member has a digging profile that is defined by the transverse configuration of that portion of the wear member that penetrates the ground in one digging pass and in the direction of motion through the ground. In one other aspect of the present invention, side relief in the wear member is provided in the digging profile to lessen the drag experienced during a digging operation. In a preferred embodiment, side relief is provided in every digging profile expected through the life of the wear member including those which encompass the mounting section.
In another aspect of the invention, the wear member includes a socket for receiving a nose of a base fixed to the excavating equipment. The socket is formed with a generally trapezoidal transverse shape that generally corresponds to the transverse trapezoidal exterior profile of the wear member. This general matching of the socket to the exterior of the mounting section eases manufacture, maximizes the size of the nose, and enhances the strength to weight ratio.
In a preferred construction, one or more of the top, bottom or side surfaces of a trapezoidal shaped nose and the corresponding walls of the socket are each bowed to fit together. These surfaces and walls have a gradual curvature to ease installation, enhance stability of the wear member, and resist rotation of the wear member about the longitudinal axis during use.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the socket and nose each includes rear stabilizing surfaces that extend substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the wear member and substantially around the perimeter of the socket and nose to resist rearward loads applied in all directions.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the socket and nose are formed with complementary front bearing faces that are substantially hemispherical to lessen stress in the components and to better control the rattle that occurs between the wear member and the base.
In another aspect of the invention, the socket and nose are formed with front curved bearing faces at their front ends, and with generally trapezoidal transverse shapes rearward of the front ends to improve stability, ease manufacture, maximize the size of the nose, reduce drag, stress and wear, and enhance the strength to weight ratio.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the wear assembly includes a base, a wear member that mounts to the base, and an axially oriented lock that in a compressive state holds the wear member to the base in a manner that is secure, easy to use, readily manufactured, and can tighten the fit of the wear member on the base. In one preferred embodiment, the wear assembly includes an adjustable axial lock.
In another aspect of the invention, the wear member includes an opening into which the lock is received, and a hole that is formed in a rear wall of the opening to accommodate passage of a lock to stabilize the lock and facilitate easy tightening of the lock.
In another aspect of the invention, the base interacts with the lock solely through the use of a projecting stop. As a result, there is no need for a hole, recess or passage in the nose such as is typically provided to receive the lock. The nose strength is thus enhanced.
In another aspect of the invention, the locking arrangement for securing the wear member to the base can be adjusted to consistently apply a predetermined tightening force to the wear member irrespective of the amount of wear that may exist in the base and/or wear member.
In another aspect of the invention, the wear member includes a marker that can be used to identify when the lock has been adequately tightened.
In another aspect of the invention, the wear member is installed and secured to the base through an easy to use, novel process involving an axial lock. The wear member fits over a nose of a base fixed to the excavating equipment. The base includes a stop that projects outward from the nose. An axial lock is received into an opening in the wear member and extends between the stop and a bearing surface on the wear member to releasably hold the wear member to the nose.
In another aspect of the invention, the wear member is first slid over a base fixed to the excavating equipment. An axially oriented lock is positioned with one bearing face against a stop on the base and another bearing face against a bearing wall on the wear member such that the lock is in axial compression. The lock is adjusted to move the wear member tightly onto the base.
In another aspect of the invention, a lock to releasably hold a wear member to a base includes a threaded linear shaft, with a bearing end and a tool engaging end, a nut threaded onto the shaft, and a spring including a plurality of alternating annular elastomeric disks and annular spacers fit about the threaded shaft between the bearing end and the nut.
The present invention pertains to a wear assembly 10 for excavating equipment, and is particularly well suited for dredging operations. In this application, the invention is described in terms of a dredge tooth adapted for attachment to a dredge cutterhead. Nevertheless, the different aspects of the invention can be used in conjunction with other kinds of wear assemblies (e.g., shrouds) and for other kinds of excavating equipment (e.g., buckets).
The assembly is at times described in relative terms such as up, down, horizontal, vertical, front and rear; such terms are not considered essential and are provided simply to ease the description. The orientation of a wear member in an excavating operation, and particularly in a dredge operation, can change considerably. These relative terms should be understood with reference to the orientation of wear assembly 10 as illustrated in
Wear assembly 10 includes a base 12 secured to a dredge cutterhead, a wear member 14, and a lock 16 to releasably hold the wear member to base 12 (
Base 12 includes a forwardly projecting nose 18 onto which wear member 14 is mounted, and a mounting end (not shown) that is fixed to an arm of a dredge cutterhead (
In a dredge tooth, wear member 14 is a point provided with a working section 21 in the form of an elongate slender bit and a mounting section 23 that defines a socket 20 to receive nose 18 (
Bit 21 of point 14 preferably has a generally trapezoidal transverse configuration with a leading side 25 that is wider than trailing side 27 (
In use, dredge point 14 penetrates the ground to a certain depth with each digging pass (i.e., with each rotation of the cutterhead). During much of the point's useful life, the bit alone penetrates the ground. As one example, the ground level in one digging cycle extends generally along line 3-3 (
In a preferred construction, sidewalls 29, 31 not only converge toward trailing side 27, but are configured so that the sidewalls lie within the shadow of the leading side 25 in the digging profile. The “digging profile” is used to mean the cross-sectional configuration of the portion of point 14 that penetrates the ground along a plane that is (i) parallel to the direction of travel 34 at the center point of a digging pass through the ground and (ii) laterally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. The digging profile is a better indication of the drag to be imposed on the point during use than a true transverse cross section. The provision of side relief in the digging profile is dependent on the angle at which the sidewalls converge toward the trailing side and the axial slope or expansion of the point surfaces in a rearward direction. The intention is to provide a width that generally narrows from the leading side to the trailing side when considered from the perspective of the digging profile. Side relief in the digging profile preferably extends across the expected cutterhead digging angles, but benefit can still be obtained if such side relief exists in at least one digging angle. As one example only, the cross-sectional configuration illustrated in
As bit 21 wears away, the ground level gradually creeps rearward so that more rearward, thicker portions of the point 14 are pushed through the ground with each digging cycle. More power is therefore required to drive the cutterhead as the points wear. Eventually, enough of the bit wears away such that the mounting section 23 of the point 14 is being driven through the ground with each digging pass. In the present invention, the mounting section 23 continues to include side relief at least at the front end 40 of the mounting section (
In one conventional point 14a, bit 21a has a trapezoidal transverse configuration with a leading side 25a that is wider than trailing side 27a. However, bit 21a does not provide side relief in the digging profile. As seen in
In one other example, bit 21 has worn down to an extent where the portion of mounting section 23 along line 6-6 (
In a preferred construction, the tapering of sidewalls 29, 31 continues from front end 37 to rear end 47 of point 14. As seen in
The use of a point 14 with side relief in bit 21 and mounting end 23 as described above can be used with virtually any nose and socket configuration. Nonetheless, in one preferred construction, front end 58 of nose 18 includes a forward-facing bearing face 60 that is convex and curved about two perpendicular axes (
Preferably, front ends 58, 62 are each generally hemispherical to reduce the rattle between point 14 and base 12 and more effectively resist loads from all directions. Front bearing surface 64 of socket 20 is preferably slightly broader than hemispherical at its ends and center to accommodate reliably mounting of points 14 on different bases (i.e., without binding or bottoming out), but which under common loads or following wear operate as a true hemispherical socket surface on the hemispherical ball surface of base 12. In a conventional tooth 10a (
Nose 18 includes a body 66 rearward of front end 58 (
Also, in a preferred embodiment, at least one of the body surfaces 68-71 and socket walls 78-81 (and preferably all of them) have mutually bowed configurations (
The use of troughs 84 and projections 86, and particularly those that are gradually curved and extending substantially across the entire widths of the surfaces 68-71 and walls 78-81 eases the assembly of point 14 onto nose 18; i.e., the troughs 84 and projections 86 cooperatively direct point 14 into the proper assembled position on nose 18 during assembly. For example, if point 14 is initially installed on nose 18 out of proper alignment with the nose as it is fit onto the nose, the engagement of projections 86 being received into the troughs 84 will tend to rotate the point into proper alignment as the point is fed rearward onto nose 18. This cooperative effect of troughs 84 and projections 86 greatly eases and speeds installation and the setting of corners 67 into corners 77. Some variations could also be used between the shapes of the socket and the nose so long as the socket predominantly matches the shape of the nose.
Nose surfaces 68-71 with troughs 84 are each preferably inclined axially to expand outward as they extend rearward to provide strength to nose 18 until reaching a rear stabilizing surface 85 of nose 18. Likewise, socket walls 78-81 with projections 86 also each expand to conform to surfaces 68-71. Socket walls 78-81 also define rear stabilizing surfaces 95 to bear against stabilizing surfaces 85. Rear stabilizing surfaces 85, 95 are substantially parallel to longitudinal axis 28. In one preferred embodiment, each stabilizing surface 85, 95 diverges axially rearward at an angle to axis 28 of about 7 degrees. The rear stabilizing surfaces 85, 95 also preferably encircle (or at least substantially encircle) nose 18 and socket 20 to better resist non-axial loads. While contact between the various socket surfaces and the nose will likely occur during an excavating operation, contact between the corresponding front bearing surfaces 60, 64 and rear stabilizing surfaces 85, 95 is intended to provide primary resistance to the applied loads on the tooth and thereby provide the desired stability. While stabilizing surfaces 85, 95 are preferably formed with short axial extensions, they could have longer or different constructions. Also, in certain circumstances, e.g., in light duty operations, benefits can be achieved without stabilizing surfaces 85, 95.
Front bearing faces 60, 64 and rear stabilizing surfaces 85, 95 are provided to stabilize the point on the nose and to lessen stress in the components. The generally hemispherical bearing faces 60, 64 at the front ends 58, 62 of the nose 18 and socket 20 are able to stably resist axial and non-axial rearward forces in direct opposition to the loads irrespective of their applied directions. This use of curved, continuous front bearing surfaces reduces rattling of the point on the nose and reduces the stress concentrations that otherwise exist when corners are present. Rear stabilizing surfaces 85, 95 complement the front bearing faces 60, 64 by reducing the rattle at the rear of the point and providing stable resistance to the rear portions of the point, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,709,043 incorporated herein by reference, With stabilizing surfaces 85, 95 extending about the entire perimeter of nose 18 or at least substantially about the entire perimeter (
Main portion 76 of socket 20 preferably has a generally trapezoidal transverse configuration to receive a matingly shaped nose 18 (
A wide variety of different locks can be used to releasably secure wear member 14 to base 12. Nonetheless, in a preferred embodiment, lock 16 is received into an opening 101 in wear member 14, preferably formed in trailing wall 27 though it could be formed elsewhere (
Nose 18 includes a stop 115 that projects outward from upper side 68 of nose 18 to engage lock 16. Stop 115 preferably has a rear face 119 with a concave, curved recess 121 into which a front end 123 of lock 16 is received and retained during use, but other arrangements could be used to cooperate with the lock. In a preferred construction, opening 101 is long enough and trailing wall 27 sufficiently inclined to provide clearance for stop 115 when wear member 14 is installed onto nose 18. Nevertheless, a relief or other forms of clearance could be provided in socket 20 if needed for the passage of stop 115. Further, the projection of stop 115 is preferably limited by the provision of a depression 118 to accommodate a portion of lock 16.
Lock 16 is a linear lock oriented generally axially to hold wear member 14 onto base 12, and to tighten the fit of wear member 14 onto nose 18. The use of a linear lock oriented axially increases the capacity of the lock to tighten the fit of the wear member on the nose; i.e., it provides for a greater length of take up. In a preferred embodiment, lock 16 includes a threaded shaft 130 having a front end 123 and a rear end with head 134, a nut 136 threaded to shaft 130, and a spring 138 (
Shaft 130 extends centrally through spring 138 to engage nut 136. Front end 123 of shaft 130 fits into recess 121 so that the shaft 130 is set against stop 115 for support. Rear end 134 of lock 16 extends through hole 113 in wear member 14 to enable a user to access the lock outside of opening 101. The shaft is preferably set at an angle to axis 28 so that head 134 is more easily accessed. Spring 138 sets between rear wall 105 and nut 136 so that it can apply a biasing force to the wear member when the lock is tightened. Hole 113 is preferably larger than head 134 to permit its passage during installation of lock 16 into assembly 10. Hole 113 could also be formed as an open slot to accommodate insertion of shaft 130 simply from above. Other tool engaging structures could be used in lieu of the illustrated head 134.
In use, wear member 14 is slid over nose 18 so that nose 18 is fit into socket 20 (
In a preferred construction, lock 16 also includes an indicator 146 fit onto shaft 130 in association with nut 136 (
Indicator 146 provides a visual indication of when shaft 130 has been suitably tightened to apply the desired pressure to the wear member without placing undue stress on shaft 130 and/or spring 138. In a preferred construction, indicator 146 cooperates with a marker 152 formed along opening 101, e.g., along rim 111 and/or sidewalls 107, 109. Marker 152 is preferably on rim 111 along one or both sidewalls 107, 109, but could have other constructions. Marker 146 is preferably a ridge or some structure that is more than mere indicia so that it can be used to retighten lock 16 when wear begins to develop as well as at the time of initial tightening.
When shaft 130 is turned and nut 136 drawn rearward, indicator 146 moves rearward (from the position in
The various aspects of the invention are preferably used together for optimal performance and advantage. Nevertheless, the different aspects can be used individually to provide the benefits they each provide.
This application is a continuation of international application PCT/US2008/062724 filed May 6, 2008, which claims the benefit of provisional applications U.S. Patent Application No. 60/928,780 filed May 10, 2007, U.S. Patent Application No. 60/928,821 filed May 10, 2007, and U.S. Patent Application No. 60/930,483 filed May 15, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
784116 | McCaskey | Mar 1905 | A |
1218841 | Dietz | Mar 1917 | A |
1438001 | Van Buskirk et al. | Dec 1922 | A |
2040085 | Fykse et al. | May 1936 | A |
2050014 | Morrison | Aug 1936 | A |
2167425 | Page | Jul 1939 | A |
2689419 | Daniels et al. | Sep 1954 | A |
2738602 | Meeks | Mar 1956 | A |
2874491 | Larsen | Feb 1959 | A |
2904909 | Ratkowski | Sep 1959 | A |
2915290 | Petersen | Dec 1959 | A |
2919506 | Larsen | Jan 1960 | A |
3012346 | Larsen | Dec 1961 | A |
3079710 | Larsen et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3331637 | Krekeler | Jul 1967 | A |
3455040 | Ratkowski | Jul 1969 | A |
3530601 | Steil | Sep 1970 | A |
3623247 | Stepe | Nov 1971 | A |
3774324 | Lafond | Nov 1973 | A |
3897642 | Helton et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3959901 | Klett | Jun 1976 | A |
3982339 | Nilsson | Sep 1976 | A |
4027408 | Ramella et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4317300 | Emrich et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4319415 | Mayerbock et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4335532 | Hahn et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4404760 | Hahn et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
D274434 | Nilsson | Jun 1984 | S |
4470210 | Hahn | Sep 1984 | A |
D275859 | Nilsson | Oct 1984 | S |
4481728 | Mulder et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4510706 | Berchem | Apr 1985 | A |
4577423 | Hahn | Mar 1986 | A |
4611418 | Launder | Sep 1986 | A |
4625439 | Johansson et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4727663 | Hahn | Mar 1988 | A |
4744692 | Olsen et al. | May 1988 | A |
4751785 | Johansson et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
5074062 | Hahn et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5152088 | Hahn | Oct 1992 | A |
5177886 | Klett | Jan 1993 | A |
5350022 | Launder et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
D354291 | Edwards | Jan 1995 | S |
5653048 | Jones et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
D389844 | Moreno | Jan 1998 | S |
D414193 | Launder et al. | Sep 1999 | S |
D417877 | Launder et al. | Dec 1999 | S |
6047487 | Clendenning | Apr 2000 | A |
6240663 | Robinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247255 | Clendenning | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D446224 | Clendenning | Aug 2001 | S |
D447154 | Clendenning | Aug 2001 | S |
6321471 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6393739 | Shamblin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430851 | Clendenning | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439796 | Ruvang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477796 | Cornelius | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6675509 | Bierwith | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6729052 | Ollinger, IV et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735890 | Carpenter et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745503 | Pallas Moreno et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6836983 | Pallas Moreno et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839990 | Leslie et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865828 | Molino et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6976325 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7523572 | Pasqualini | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7730651 | Carpenter | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20010001352 | Fernandez et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20030005606 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024139 | Jones et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030101627 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040093771 | Carpenter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040118021 | Renski | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050050775 | Clendenning et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055853 | Livesay et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050120596 | Kasim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132619 | Robinson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060013648 | Bernstein | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070227051 | Carpenter et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080000114 | Bentley | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61176724 | Aug 1986 | JP |
04306329 | Oct 1992 | JP |
10183698 | Jul 1998 | JP |
WO 8703316 | Jun 1987 | WO |
WO 2004035945 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110232139 A9 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60930483 | May 2007 | US | |
60928780 | May 2007 | US | |
60928821 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2008/062724 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 12613467 | US |