The present invention pertains to a system and tool for monitoring the status, health, and performance of wear parts used on various kinds of earth working equipment.
In mining and construction, wear parts (e.g., teeth, shrouds, and lips) are commonly provided along the edges of excavating equipment to protect the underlying equipment from undue wear and, in some cases, also perform other functions such as breaking up the ground ahead of the digging edge. For example, buckets for dragline machines, cable shovels, face shovels, hydraulic excavators, and the like are typically provided with multiple wear components such as excavating teeth and shrouds that are attached to a lip of a bucket. A tooth typically includes an adapter secured to the lip of a bucket and a wear member attached to the adapter to initiate contact with the ground and break up the ground ahead of the digging edge of the bucket.
During use, the wear parts typically encounter heavy loading and highly abrasive conditions that at times cause the wear parts to become disengaged and lost from the excavating machine. For example, as a bucket engages the ground a wear member, also known as a point, occasionally will be lost from the adapter. The operators of the excavating machines are not always able to see when a wear part has been lost. It is well known that a lost wear part may cause damage to downstream excavating equipment. For example, a lost wear member may cause damage that leads to additional downtime for conveyors, screens, pumps, and crushers. If a wear part becomes caught in a crusher, the wear part may be ejected and cause a hazard to workers or it may be jammed and require an operator to dislodge the part, which at times may be a difficult, time-consuming and/or hazardous process. Additionally, continuing to operate the excavating equipment with missing wear parts can lead to a decrease in production and excessive wear on other components on the excavating equipment.
The abrasive environment causes the wear parts to eventually become worn. If the wear parts are not replaced at the appropriate time, an excessively worn wear part can be lost, production may decrease, and other components of the excavating equipment may experience unnecessary wear.
Systems with varying degrees of success have been used to monitor when a wear member has been worn or damaged and needs replacement. For example, the Tooth-Wear Monitoring system and Missing Tooth Detection system sold by Motion Metrics uses an optical camera mounted on a shovel boom of excavating equipment. In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 8,411,930 relates to a system and method for detecting damaged or missing wear members. The system has a vibration resistant video camera that is preferably mounted on a shovel boom. Because the above systems are located on the shovel boom, the systems only have a clear view of the wear members during a portion of the digging and dumping operation. As a result, there is potential for the systems to not immediately register that a wear member has been lost or needs replacement. In addition should the systems incorrectly register that a wear member has been lost, the systems may have to wait until the next digging and dumping cycle to confirm that the wear member is truly lost and that an object was not obstructing the systems view and registering a false alarm.
Other systems with varying degrees of success have been used to monitor if a wear member is secured to the base on an excavating machine. For example, mechanical systems have been fixed between the wear member and the base for detecting the absence and presence of the wear member. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,870,485, the system contains a spring loaded switch between the wear parts. When the wear parts are separated an electrical switch activates a radio transmitter alerting the operator that a wear part has been lost. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,031, the system comprises an indicator attached to the tooth and an actuator secured to the nose. In one example, the actuator actuates, a smoke canister to provide a visual signal that the tooth has fallen off or is about to fall off. These systems do not determine when a wear member has reached the end of life and needs to be replaced and these mechanical systems can be costly and cumbersome to install when a wear member is worn and needs replacement.
The present invention pertains to a system and tool for monitoring wear parts for earth working equipment. The monitoring tool is particularly well suited for monitoring the presence and health (i.e., the current wear profile) of wear parts utilized with buckets used for excavating in mining and construction environments.
In one aspect of the invention, electronic sensors are used in conjunction with programmable logic to determine if wear parts are present on the earth working equipment. If a wear part is not present the programmable logic triggers an alert. The alert notifies the operator when a wear part has been lost from the excavating equipment. This allows the operator to take the necessary actions to ensure that the missing wear part is replaced and that the missing wear part does not damage downstream excavating equipment. As examples, the electronic sensor may be a camera, a laser range finder, an ultrasonic sensor, or another distance measuring sensor. In one preferred construction, the camera is chosen from a group consisting of 2D cameras, 3D cameras, and infrared cameras.
In another aspect of the invention, electronic sensors are used in conjunction with programmable logic to determine the degree a wear part on the earth working equipment has been worn. If the wear part is worn a predetermined amount the programmable logic triggers an alert. The alert notifies the operator when a worn wear part should be replaced. This allows the operator to take the actions needed to replace the worn wear part so that other components of the earth working equipment do not experience unnecessary wear. As examples, the electronic sensor may be a camera, a laser range finder, an ultrasonic sensor, or another distance measuring sensor. In one preferred construction, the camera is chosen from a group consisting of 2D cameras, 3D cameras, and infrared cameras.
In another aspect of the invention, electronic sensors are used in conjunction with programmable logic to determine how full a bucket is loaded during a digging operation. In one preferred construction, the programmable logic may be programmed to communicate the current and past loads for each digging cycle to an operator or wireless device. This allows the operator to adjust the digging operation to optimally fill the bucket to the desired capacity. This system could be a stand-alone system or integrated with another system such as a monitoring system for monitoring the presence and/or health of wear parts installed on the bucket. As examples, the electronic sensor may be a camera, a laser range finder, an ultrasonic sensor, or another distance measuring sensor. In one preferred construction, the camera is chosen from a group consisting of 2D cameras, 3D cameras, and infrared cameras.
In another aspect of the invention, electronic sensors and programmable logic are used to determine a percentage that the bucket has been filled. The percentage may be determined by measuring the current fill of the bucket and comparing the current fill to the rated capacity of the bucket. The electronic sensor may be, for example, a camera, a laser range finder, an ultrasonic sensor, or another distance measuring sensor. In one preferred construction, the camera is chosen from a group consisting of 2D cameras, 3D cameras, and infrared cameras. This system could be a stand-alone system or integrated with another system such as a bucket fill monitoring system.
In another aspect of the invention, electronic sensors are used to determine the digging cycle time. In one preferred construction, programmable logic may be programmed to communicate the current cycle time and past cycle times for each digging cycle of the bucket to an operator or wireless device. This allows the operator to adjust the digging operation for optimal performance. As examples, an accelerometer and/or an inclinometer may be used to determine the beginning of a digging cycle. This system may be a stand-alone system or may be integrated with another system such as a monitoring system for monitoring the presence and/or health of wear parts installed on the bucket.
In another aspect of the invention, electronic sensors are used to determine high impact events on a bucket digging edge (i.e., higher than experienced during the normal digging operation). In one preferred construction, programmable logic may record the time of the high impact event. The programmable logic may be programmed to communicate the high impact events to an operator or wireless device. As an example, an accelerometer may be used to determine when a high impact event occurs. This system may be a stand-alone system but can be integrated with another system such as a monitoring system for monitoring the presence and/or health of wear parts installed on the bucket. This allows an operator or maintenance personnel to better determine what may have caused the current state of the wear parts (e.g., the wear member is present, the wear member is lost, and the wear member is worn).
In another aspect of the invention, a tool is installed on a wear part that engages and moves the earth to be excavated. In one preferred construction the tool is installed on a bucket used for excavating so that the monitoring system has a clear line of sight to a digging edge of the bucket throughout the digging and dumping operation. The tool may be secured to an interior surface of the bucket or the tool may be secured to an exterior surface of the bucket. As examples, the monitoring system may be integrated with the shell of the bucket, integrated between two interior plates of a bucket having a double wall shell, or installed on the bridge or top of the bucket.
In another aspect of the invention, features are incorporated onto the wear part to aid in absence and presence detection. In one preferred construction, the features are incorporated onto an adapter so that if the monitoring system is able to detect the feature the monitoring system is programmed to send an alert that the wear member has been lost. In another preferred construction, the features are incorporated onto the wear member so that if the monitoring system is able to detect the feature the monitoring system is programmed to indicate that the wear member has not been lost from the excavating equipment.
In another aspect of the invention, features are incorporated onto the wear part to aid in determining the degree a wear part on the excavating equipment has been worn. In one preferred construction, a wear part contains multiple features along the length of the expected wear profile so that as the wear part wears the monitoring system is able to detect the number of features remaining on the wear part.
In another aspect of the invention, the monitoring system provides alerts to equipment operators, databases, and remote devises when the wear parts on the excavating equipment need maintenance. In one preferred construction, the monitoring system communicates wirelessly.
In another aspect of the invention, the monitoring system is provided with a device to display or indicate the status, health, and performance of the wear parts. In one preferred construction, the monitoring system is provided with a monitor. In another preferred construction, the monitoring system is integrated with a display system that is a part of the excavating equipment being monitored or a display that is remote to the monitoring system.
In another aspect of the invention, the monitoring system stores the history of the status, health, and performance of the wear parts.
In another aspect of the invention, the monitoring system utilizes lights to illuminate the wear parts to be monitored so that the electronic sensors provide accurate readings regarding the status, health, and performance of the wear parts.
The present invention pertains to a system for monitoring the status, health, and performance of wear parts used on various kinds of earth working equipment including, for example, excavating equipment and ground conveying equipment. Excavating equipment is intended as a general term to refer to any of a variety of excavating machines used in mining, construction and other activities, and which, for example, include dozers, loaders, dragline machines, cable shovels, face shovels, and hydraulic excavators. Excavating equipment also refers to the ground-engaging components of these machines such as the bucket, blade, or the cutter head. Ground conveying equipment is also intended as a general term to refer to a variety of equipment that is used to convey earthen material and which, for example, includes chutes and mining truck beds or bodies. The present invention is suited for monitoring the status, health and performance of wear parts used on excavating equipment in the form of, for example, excavating buckets, blades, lips, teeth, and shrouds. Additionally, certain aspects of the present invention are also suited for monitoring the status and health of a wear surface in the form of, for example, runners and truck beds or bodies. For convenience of discussion, the wear part monitoring process is discussed in terms of a monitoring system that monitors a point on a mining excavator, however, the monitoring process may be used with other wear parts used with many kinds of earth working equipment.
Relative terms such as front, rear, top, bottom and the like are used for convenience of discussion. The terms front or forward are generally used to indicate the usual direction of travel of the earthen material relative to the wear part during use (e.g., while digging), and upper or top are generally used as a reference to the surface over which the material passes when, for example, it is gathered into the bucket. Nevertheless, it is recognized that in the operation of various earth working machines the wear assemblies may be oriented in various ways and move in all kinds of directions during use.
A mining excavator 1 is equipped with a bucket 3 for gathering earthen material while digging (
When a wear member reaches a minimum recommended wear profile (i.e., the wear member is considered fully worn), the wear member is replaced so that production does not decrease and the base, upon which the wear member rests, does not experience unnecessary wear.
Because each type of wear member has a recommended or set minimum wear profile, one of the wear member checks may be to determine the current length of each wear member on the bucket. The monitoring system 25 may use an electronic sensor 27 to determine the current length of each wear member on the bucket (
Because each wear member and each base has a specific geometry, another wear member check may be to determine the features of each wear member and base on the bucket to assist with knowing if the wear member is still attached to the base. As will be disclosed in detail below, unique features and/or patterns may also be included on the wear member or on the base to assist with knowing if the wear member is still attached to the base. If the key features, unique features and/or patterns are incorporated onto the wear member and the monitoring system is able to detect the feature and the results of the other parallel wear member checks are acceptable (e.g., wear profile is acceptable and the number of edges extending from the base match the expected number of edges extending from the base), the monitoring system is programmed that the wear member has not been lost from the excavating equipment. In an alternative embodiment, the unique features and/or patterns are incorporated onto a base such that the unique feature and/or pattern can only be seen if the wear member is missing. If the monitoring system registers the features and/or pattern and the results of the other parallel wear member checks are not acceptable (e.g., wear profile is not acceptable and the number of edges extending from the base does not match the expected number of edges extending from the base), the monitoring system is programmed to produce an alert that the wear member has been lost.
Because each base has a specific number of edges extending from it (i.e., for each base there is one wear part extending from the base), another wear member check may be to determine how many edges are extending from the base attached to the lip of the bucket to assist with knowing if the wear member is still attached to the base. This may be done by counting the number of edges extending from the base or lip (i.e., the number of edges extending from the base or lip in a forward direction parallel to the motion of the bucket in a normal digging operation) and comparing them to the expected number of edges extending from the base or lip. If, for example, the number of edges extending from the base or lip does not match the expected number of edges extending from the base or lip and the results of the other parallel wear member checks are acceptable (e.g., wear profile is acceptable and the wear part is on the base), the programmable logic is programmed to give a precautionary alert (not shown) and/or may be programmed to repeat the monitoring process from the beginning. The monitoring process may be repeated because there may have been an error in the process (e.g., a rock or other item was miss-interpreted as a wear member). In a similar fashion if the wear member is on the base but the number of edges extending from the base does not match the expected number of edges extending from the base and the wear profile of the wear part is not acceptable, the programmable logic is programmed to repeat the monitoring process from the beginning (not shown in
The results and alerts from the process may be sent to a Human Machine Interface (HMI). Details of the HMI will be discussed in further detail below. The bucket health monitoring system may also communicate with other computer systems wirelessly or through a cable the specific wear member(s) needing maintenance either because the wear member is lost or because the wear member is worn past the minimum wear profile. In addition the monitoring system may store all of the results from the process.
In addition to monitoring the status and health of the wear members on the bucket, the monitoring system may monitor the performance of the bucket or other wear members. For example, the monitoring system may determine how full the bucket is loaded during the digging cycle. As the bucket is loaded, the material being excavated has a tendency to fill the bucket with an established profile. Once the bucket 3a has been filled by the operator the electronic sensors 27 measure the distance D1 to the load 91 within the bucket 3a (
The monitoring system may be equipped with electronic sensors that are capable of determining the cycle time of a digging cycle. For example, the monitoring system may be equipped with an accelerometer and an inclinometer (not shown). The inclinometer provides the orientation of the bucket and the accelerometer registers a spike in force when the bucket is at the appropriate digging orientation and thus indicating that the digging cycle has started. Programmable logic may determine the time from the start of one digging cycle to the start of the second digging cycle (i.e., time between peaks when inclinometer indicates that the bucket is at the appropriate digging orientation). The results from the current cycle time and past cycle times may be communicated to the equipment operator or to a wireless device. This allows the operator to adjust the digging operation for optimal performance. It is also possible for the electronic sensors for determining the cycle time to not be incorporated with the monitoring system. Monitoring the fill of a bucket or truck tray and/or cycle time can help mine operators (or the like) to better optimize its operations. In an alternative embodiment, a pressure sensor may be used instead of an accelerometer to determine when the digging cycle has started. The pressure sensor may be a hydraulic pressure sensor integrated with the boom of the earth working equipment. In another preferred embodiment, a strain gauge or load cell is used to determine when the digging cycle has started. The strain gauge or load cell may be located in the bucket or a wear member on the bucket. In an alternative embodiment, GPS may be used to determine the orientation of the bucket.
The monitoring system may be equipped with electronic sensors that are capable of determining high impact events on the bucket digging edge (i.e., higher than experienced during normal digging operation). For example, the monitoring system may utilize an accelerometer, strain gauge, load cell, or pressure sensor to determine peak impacts (not shown). Programmable logic may record the time of the high impact event. The results of the high impact events may be communicated to the equipment operator or to a wireless device. It is also possible for the electronic sensors for determining the high impact event to be separate components from the electronic sensor for determining the digging cycle time or not be incorporated with the monitoring system.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention the monitoring system 25 having at least one electronic sensor is incorporated with the bucket 3 so that the sensor always has a clear line of sight to the digging edge or lip 5 of the bucket 3 regardless of how the operator orients the bucket 3 during the digging and dumping operation (
The electronic sensor(s) 27 may be housed in one or more enclosures 31 in one or more locations on the wear part that engages and moves the ground to be excavated to protect the electronic sensor(s) 27 from the harsh mining environment and to keep the aperture 33 of the housing of the electronic sensor 27 free of fines, dirt, or other material that may negatively impact the electronic sensor 27 (
The enclosure may have at least one cutout 37 on one side so that the aperture 33 of the at least one electronic sensor 27 has a clear line of sight to the lip 5 of the bucket 3 (
The electronic sensor 27 and additional electronic equipment (not shown) may be mounted on vibration dampening devices 53 so that the vibrations of the digging and dumping operation do not negatively affect the electronic sensor 27 and additional electronic equipment (
A unique feature and/or pattern 57 may be added along the length of the expected wear profile of the wear member 15 to aid the monitoring system in determining the current wear profile of the wear member 15 (
Unique features and/or patterns may be incorporated onto the wear member or base to aid in absence and presence detection. The unique feature and/or pattern may be added to the wear member or base at the time of manufacture or after manufacturing. The unique feature and/or pattern 57 may be, for example, grooves 59 and/or ridges cut, cast, or forged into the top exterior surface 61 of the wear member (
At least one HMI 71 may be provided to display the current status and health of the wear members on the bucket (
The various monitoring systems and features can be used together or as a single stand-alone system without the other capabilities. Although the above discussion has discussed the invention in connection with teeth on a bucket, the system can be used to sense the presence and/or health of other wear parts on a bucket such as shrouds, wings, and/or runners. Moreover, systems of the present invention can also be used to monitor the presence and or health of wear parts on other kinds of earth working equipment such as runners on chutes or truck trays, or end bits on blades.
The above disclosure describes specific examples for a bucket wear monitoring system. The system includes different aspects or features of the invention. The features in one embodiment can be used with features of another embodiment. The examples given and the combination of features disclosed are not intended to be limiting in the sense that they must be used together.
This application claims priority benefits to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/908,458 filed Nov. 25, 2013 and entitled “Wear Part Monitoring,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
561758 | Brewer | Jun 1896 | A |
4001798 | Robinson | Jan 1977 | A |
4181360 | Wilson | Jan 1980 | A |
4187626 | Greer et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4368919 | Whittaker et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4407081 | Hanson | Oct 1983 | A |
4499960 | Ehrich | Feb 1985 | A |
4550512 | Felstet | Nov 1985 | A |
4604604 | Mann | Aug 1986 | A |
4655082 | Peterson | Apr 1987 | A |
4700224 | Miyasaka | Oct 1987 | A |
4709265 | Silverman et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4809794 | Blair et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4818990 | Fernandes | Apr 1989 | A |
4845763 | Bandyopadhyay | Jul 1989 | A |
4932145 | Reeves, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
5144762 | Robinson | Sep 1992 | A |
5555652 | Ashby | Sep 1996 | A |
5701179 | Chatterjee | Dec 1997 | A |
5743031 | Launder et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5824965 | Fujii et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5850341 | Fournier et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871391 | Pryor | Feb 1999 | A |
5926558 | Zelt, III et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6032390 | Bierwith | Mar 2000 | A |
6360850 | Odisho et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363173 | Stentz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6497153 | Hoskinson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6518519 | Crane, III et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523586 | Eromaeki et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6868314 | Frink | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870485 | Lujan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6957622 | Boettcher et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6990390 | Groth | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7248154 | Menke | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7574821 | Furem | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579952 | Osterhold | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7677079 | Radziszewski et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7836615 | Winter | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7874085 | Winter et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7908928 | Vik | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930844 | Quarfordt et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941306 | Furem | May 2011 | B2 |
8024874 | McClanahan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8050489 | Eberle et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8087477 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8150105 | Mian et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8240070 | Phillips | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8327563 | Dingwall et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8386196 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8405721 | Bilandi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406963 | Farmer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8411930 | Ridley | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8583313 | Mian | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8738304 | Hall | May 2014 | B2 |
8738342 | Lind et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8775099 | Wagner | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8791997 | Munkelt et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8820845 | Hall | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843279 | Tafazoli Bilandi et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8872818 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9036861 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9145741 | Trinh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9169923 | Knisely | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9234422 | Hall | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9235902 | Jahanshahi et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9243381 | Behmlander et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9310189 | Burgunder et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9311513 | Miller | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20040227645 | Lujan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050261799 | Groth | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060243839 | Barscevicius et al. | Nov 2006 | A9 |
20070286474 | Dralle | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080047170 | Nichols | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100103260 | Williams | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100215212 | Flakes, Jr. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110162241 | Wangsness | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110309935 | Emmett et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313625 | Miller et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317909 | Jeyaraman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120043980 | Davies | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120098654 | Ebert | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120136630 | Murphy et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169876 | Reichert et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120218411 | Wu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120262708 | Connolly | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120300059 | Stege | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035875 | Hall et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049935 | Miller | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130082846 | McKinley et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091745 | Moller | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130145660 | Zamorano | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151170 | Uchida | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130174453 | Cheyne et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140105481 | Hasselbusch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140125804 | Dammers | May 2014 | A1 |
20140168420 | Naderhirn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140212846 | Miller et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150085123 | Tafazoli Bilandi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160178483 | Sidles | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160221618 | Sidles | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2880927 | Feb 2014 | CA |
2913706 | Jun 2007 | CN |
2977681 | Jan 2013 | FR |
132140 | Nov 1959 | SU |
174996 | Sep 1965 | SU |
1254308 | Aug 1986 | SU |
WO 2006128258 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2012112587 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012116408 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Loadrite: On Board Weighing Systems for Escavators, www.loadrites.cales.com, pp. 1-6, (2012). |
“Vision Sensors for the Detection of Rail Wear Zones on Train Cars”, Sickinsight, http://wvvw.sickinsight-online.com/vision-sensors-for-the-detection-of-rail-wear-zones-on-trai. |
Lim et al., “Tooth Guard: A Vision System for Detecting Missing Tooth in Rope Mine Shovel”, https://jvbsoares.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/tooth—guard—wacv—2016.pdf. |
Riegl, “Mobile Laser Scanning”, www.riegl.com, http://www.riegal.com/nc/products/mobile-scanning/, Oct. 2, 2014. |
Stephen Se et al., “Stereo-Vision Based 3D Modeling and Localization for Unmanned Vehicles”, Intl J. of Intelligent Control & Systems, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 47-58, Mar. 2008. |
Trimble, “Applications and Markets”, www.trimble.com, http://uas.trimble.com/applicants-and-markets, Oct. 2, 2014. |
Trimble, “Installation Instructions: Trimble Yield Monitoring System”, www.trimble.com, Version 2.00, Revision A, Westminster, CO., Dec. 2012. |
Trimble, “Trimble Loadrite X2350 Excavator Scales”, www.trimble.com, Westminster, CO., 2013. |
Trimble, “Yield Monitoring”, www.trimble.com, http://www.trimble.com/Agriculture/yield-monitoring.aspx, Nov. 7, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150149049 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61908458 | Nov 2013 | US |