Patent Application
20110247939
This invention relates to aluminum or aluminum alloy parts and their use in applications requiring wear resistance and more particularly relates to ceramic coated aluminum oxide articles having improved wear resistance and to their method of manufacture.
Because of weight reduction and corrosion resistance, the use of aluminum and its alloys in numerous applications is desirable. Unfortunately aluminum and its alloys are not suitable in such applications where high wear resistance is needed.
Aluminum products have been known that have oxidized surfaces that increase corrosion resistance, and to some extent wear resistance, through a process known as anodization. In such a process aluminum or its alloys are immersed in an acidic electrolyte and subjected to a DC current as an anode to form a corrosion inhibiting aluminum oxide layer. Such anodized layers may also somewhat increase wear resistance, especially in the case of “hardcoat” anodizing that can provide oxide thicknesses of as much as about 0.01 inch (250 μm). The increased wear resistance is believed to be at least partly due to the increased thickness but the wear resistance is still not nearly as good as needed or desired in machine parts.
More recently, e.g. as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,720,866 and 6,365,028, incorporated herein by reference as background art, a process has been described that uses alternating current, instead of a direct current and an alkaline electrolyte, instead of an acidic electrolyte to obtain a coating on aluminum and its alloys. The described process is complex generally requiring an at least three component electrolyte containing a relatively large amount of a pyrophosphate and requiring a high starting current density.
Using the process described in this patent, articles can be obtained that have greatly improved wear resistance as compared with anodized products. Such products have been made by Keronite International, Ltd. of the United Kingdom. Wear resistance increases of as much as twenty times that of aluminum or aluminum alloy alone have been reported, e.g. in “Motorsport Applications” on the “Keronite” web site at www.keronite.com/motorsport.asp. It is not known or admitted that this disclosure constitutes citable art since the date of posting on the web site is unknown.
In any case a wear resistance increase of twenty times over untreated aluminum alloy is significant but still not as good as desired.
The invention includes a ceramic coated aluminum or aluminum alloy article having wear resistance of at least thirty times that of a comparable uncoated aluminum or aluminum alloy article under the same wear conditions. The invention further includes a method for making such articles.
More particularly, the invention includes a method for forming a wear resistant ceramic coating on an aluminum alloy article. The alloy preferably contains from about 85 to about 92 percent aluminum with a plurality of other oxidizable metals selected from copper, magnesium, zinc, and chromium. Less that about 2 percent total of other elements is usually present. In accordance with the invention, the alloy preferably contains less than 0.5 percent each of manganese, iron and silicon. An example of such an alloy is 7075 aluminum alloy.
The method includes the steps of:
a) immersing the article in an aqueous electrolyte containing from about 1.5 to about 2.5 grams per liter of alkali metal hydroxide and from about 6.5 to about 9.5 grams per liter of alkali metal silicate. In general no more than 1 g per liter of alkali metal pyrophosphate is present and no more than about 0.05 percent of hydrogen peroxide is present, and
b) applying an alternating current through the electrolyte using the article as one electrode where a second electrode includes at least one of an electrically conductive container or an immersed separate electrode, where applied EMF is selected to provide a current density of from about 15 to about 25 A/dm2, for a sufficient time to obtain a wear resistant ceramic coating having a thickness of from about 125 to about 150 μm, as measured on a flat face of the article.
It is to be understood that parts and percentages are by weight.
In accordance with the invention, it has been surprisingly discovered that a ceramic coated aluminum or aluminum alloy article, having superior wear resistance in excess of thirty and as much as forty times the wear resistance of raw aluminum or raw aluminum alloy, can be obtained by simplifying the above described prior method where a wear resistance of only up to about twenty times raw aluminum or aluminum alloy can be obtained.
In particular, in accordance with the present invention, and contrary to teachings of the above discussed prior art, the electrolyte used in the present invention contains less than 0.05 percent hydrogen peroxide and preferably no hydrogen peroxide and contains less one gram per liter of pyrophosphate and preferably no pyrophosphate. In general, other additives and modifiers, described in the above prior art as being needed or desired, are not present in the electrolyte used in accordance with the invention. The electrolyte preferably contains no components (other than water) that form gases upon electrolysis. The electrolyte preferably is an aqueous solution of from about 1.5 to about 2.5 grams per liter of potassium hydroxide and from about 6.5 to about 9.5 grams per liter of sodium silicate
Further, in accordance with the present invention, initial high current densities are not used, contrary to the teachings of the above prior art where high initial current densities are described as being needed or desired. The current used in the method is an alternating current preferably having a frequency of from about 30 to about 2000 cycles per second (cps) and most commonly from about 50 to about 60 cps.
Ceramic coating, as used herein, means a crystalline or microcrystalline high temperature resistant chemical compound that at a minimum contains aluminum and oxygen. Although the ceramic structure is complex, it may be conveniently represented as containing a major portion of an aluminum oxide or modified aluminum oxide. Again, even though the ceramic material is complex including physically and chemically intertwined oxides, it may conveniently be represented as also containing lesser amounts of oxides of copper, magnesium, zinc, chromium, manganese, iron and silicon.
The time for employing the method of the invention can vary but must be neither too fast, which tends to create porous and or weak coatings or too slow which lends inefficiency to the process. In general, the desired time is from about 100 to about 160 minutes with about 120 minutes being preferred. In general, current density should not be above 25 Amperes per square decimeter (25 A/dm2).
Articles needing excellent wear resistance, desirably made by the method of the invention, for example, include a wear resistant sprocket, gear, cylinder face, cylinder wall, bearing face, clutch face, disc brake face, brake pad face, or brake drum face. The method of the invention is especially suitable for the preparation of wear resistant timing sprockets including variable cam timing sprockets and proportional cam timing sprockets.
The following example illustrates the method of the invention and an article made thereby.
Essentially identical sprockets having an area of 2.56 dm2 were machined from 7075 aluminum alloy. One of the sprockets was subjected to the method of the invention to provide a ceramic coating on its surface.
More particularly, the sprocket was immersed in an electrolyte bath having a composition of 2 grams per liter of potassium hydroxide and 8 grams per liter of sodium silicate. No significant amounts of other components were present. The sprocket was surrounded by a stainless steel cage where the cage acted as one electrode and the sprocket acted as another electrode. Upon startup, sufficient EMF was provided to obtain a current flow of from about 51 Amperes (A) and 52 A. Based upon the surface area of 2.56 dm2, that amounted to an initial current density of about 20 A/dm2 relative to the sprocket. This current density dropped over a time period of about 60 minutes to about 15.6 A/dm2 at a total current flow of about 40 A resulting in a dense ceramic coating on the sprocket face having a thickness of about 70 μm to about 80 μm. The current flow of 40 A was then essentially maintained for 30 minutes, dropping to about 39 A at the end of the thirty minutes to obtain a dense ceramic coating having a total thickness of about 95 to about 110 μm. The current density was then maintained for an additional thirty minutes to obtain an end dense coating thickness of from about 125 to about 150 μm.
The sprocket was polished and tested for wear in a testing device having a sprocket mounting shaft within a container having a consistently maintained clean oil level. An electric drive was provided and a drive chain connected the motor with the sprocket to drive the sprocket. The sprocket was then driven for about 1200 hours at incrementally increasing speeds of 500, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400 and 2800 rpm with about 75 percent of the time at 2800 rpm. An equivalent “miles driven” calculation was made using the formula: D=(60R/2000)T where D=distance, R=rpm, and T=time. Based upon the above formula, the total miles driven was in excess of 85,000 miles with essentially no wear. A raw 7075 sprocket, as described above was subjected to essentially the same test. Initial signs of wear (polishing) occurred at only about 21 hours running initially for 50 minutes at 500 rpm and the balance minutes time at 800 rpm. Visible wear occurred on tooth sides at only about 48 hours. Wear became ever more apparent as the test proceeded.
No wear on the coated sprocket was apparent at the end of the test 1200 hours; whereas, initial signs of wear (polishing) occurred at only 21 hours and visible signs of tooth wear at tooth sides occurred at only about 44 hours. The coated sprocket therefore had a wear ratio to the raw aluminum alloy sprocket at initial signs of wear of the aluminum alloy of greater than 55 (1200/21) and the coated sprocket had a wear ratio to the raw aluminum alloy sprocket at clearly visible signs of wear of the aluminum alloy of greater than 27 (1200/44). This ratio is actually larger than 27 since the uncoated sprocket was not stopped and observed between 21 and 44 hours.
Photographs of sprocket teeth from a side view are shown in
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11724979 | Mar 2007 | US |
| Child | 13165130 | US |
